<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Solmaz Abbaspoursani &#8211; Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://noise.getoto.net/author/solmaz-abbaspoursani/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://noise.getoto.net</link>
	<description>The collective thoughts of the interwebz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Git clone: a data-driven study on cloning behaviors</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2020/12/22/git-clone-a-data-driven-study-on-cloning-behaviors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solmaz Abbaspoursani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://github.blog/?p=55642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@derrickstolee recently discussed several different git clone options, but how do those options actually affect your Git performance? Which option is fastest for your client experience? Which option is fastest for your build machines? How can these options impact]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 33/35 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching using Memcached

Served from: noise.getoto.net @ 2026-02-09 19:50:11 by W3 Total Cache
-->