<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>backdoors &#8211; Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://noise.getoto.net/tag/backdoors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://noise.getoto.net</link>
	<description>The collective thoughts of the interwebz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 11:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Backdooring Open-Weight AI Models</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2026/10/16/backdooring-open-weight-ai-models/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 11:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=72789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://projectdiscovery.io/research/how-abliterated-models-can-get-you-pwned">This</a> is a problem:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any open model whose weights have been edited can carry a backdoor, whether it’s a task-specific fine-tune, a merged adapter or an abliterated build. We have abliterated models in the title because it’s the most popular reason people download modified weights without verifying what’s inside. Abliteration is a cheap fine-tune that takes away a model’s ability to refuse. You find the direction in the weights that carries “no” and subtract it. The model then answers things a safety-tuned version would turn down. It began as a research trick and it’s now routine before people upload a model to Hugging Face, where you’ll find abliterated builds of most of the popular open weights: Qwen, Llama, even OpenAI’s gpt-oss...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>End-to-End Encryption and “Going Dark”</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2026/07/23/end-to-end-encryption-and-going-dark/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[academic papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=72344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>New paper: “<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6959699">Encryption and Globalization 15 Years Later: End-to-End Encryption and the Third Round of the ‘Going Dark’ Debate</a>“:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Abstract</b>: This Article updates and expands on 2012 research on encryption and globalization, analyzing what the authors call “Round 3” of the Going Dark Debate: the current controversies over end-to-end encryption (E2EE). Governments around the world have proposed, and in some cases enacted, laws limiting E2EE for law enforcement and national security purposes.</p>
<p>This Article explains the underlying technologies and market developments for a law and policy audience to assess those proposals critically. The Article proceeds in three parts tracking three rounds of the Going Dark Debate. Round 1 covers the Crypto Wars of the 1990s, when U.S. export controls on strong encryption ultimately fell in 1999. Round 2 covers the period roughly 2010 to 2015, when encryption-in-transit became widespread but lawful access remained available through cloud providers, giving rise to what the authors called a “golden age of surveillance” rather than a period of going dark. Round 3 addresses the current debate over E2EE, where no entity between sender and recipient can read the plaintext...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factoring RSA Keys with Many Zeros</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2026/06/29/factoring-rsa-keys-with-many-zeros/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=72232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting research on a <a href="https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/06/12/factoring-short-sleeve-rsa-keys-with-polynomials/">new class</a> of weak RSA keys: keys with lots of zeros. It turns out that these keys are out in the wild.</p>
<blockquote><p>The badkeys project is an open-source service that checks public keys for known vulnerabilities. While developing this tool, Hanno collected a massive number of real-world keys from public sources, including Certificate Transparency logs, internet-wide TLS and SSH scans, PGP keys, and many others. By searching this dataset for unexpectedly sparse RSA moduli, we uncovered a large number of keys in the wild with the patterns in Figure 1...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Security of Password Managers</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2026/02/23/on-the-security-of-password-managers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 12:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=71642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/02/password-managers-promise-that-they-cant-see-your-vaults-isnt-always-true/">Good article</a> on password managers that secretly have a backdoor.</p>
<blockquote><p>New research shows that these claims aren’t true in all cases, particularly when account recovery is in place or password managers are set to share vaults or organize users into groups. The researchers reverse-engineered or closely analyzed Bitwarden, Dashlane, and LastPass and identified ways that someone with control over the server­—either administrative or the result of a compromise­—can, in fact, steal data and, in some cases, entire vaults. The researchers also devised other attacks that can weaken the encryption to the point that ciphertext can be converted to plaintext...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backdoor in Notepad++</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2026/02/05/backdoor-in-notepad/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=71556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hackers associated with the Chinese government used a <a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/02/notepad-updater-was-compromised-for-6-months-in-supply-chain-attack/">Trojaned version</a> of Notepad++ to deliver malware to selected users.</p>
<blockquote><p>Notepad++ said that officials with the unnamed provider hosting the update infrastructure consulted with incident responders and found that it remained compromised until September 2. Even then, the attackers maintained credentials to the internal services until December 2, a capability that allowed them to continue redirecting selected update traffic to malicious servers. The threat actor “specifically targeted Notepad++ domain with the goal of exploiting insufficient update verification controls that existed in older versions of Notepad++.” Event logs indicate that the hackers tried to re-exploit one of the weaknesses after it was fixed but that the attempt failed...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacking Electronic Safes</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/09/17/hacking-electronic-safes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Vulnerabilities in <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/securam-prologic-safe-lock-backdoor-exploits/">electronic safes</a> that use Securam Prologic locks:</p>
<blockquote><p>While both their techniques represent glaring security vulnerabilities, Omo says it’s the one that exploits a feature intended as a legitimate unlock method for locksmiths that’s the more widespread and dangerous. “This attack is something where, if you had a safe with this kind of lock, I could literally pull up the code right now with no specialized hardware, nothing,” Omo says. “All of a sudden, based on our testing, it seems like people can get into almost any Securam Prologic lock in the world.”...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The UK May Be Dropping Its Backdoor Mandate</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/08/28/the-uk-may-be-dropping-its-backdoor-mandate/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The US Director of National Intelligence is reporting that the UK government is dropping its backdoor mandate against the Apple iPhone. For now, at least, assuming that Tulsi Gabbard is reporting this accurately.
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encryption Backdoor in Military/Police Radios</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/08/26/encryption-backdoor-in-military-police-radios/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2023/07/backdoor-in-tetra-police-radios.html">wrote about</a> this in 2023. Here’s <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/tetra-radio-encryption-backdoor/">the story</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Three Dutch security analysts discovered the vulnerabilities­—five in total—­in a European radio standard called TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio), which is used in radios made by Motorola, Damm, Hytera, and others. The standard has been used in radios since the ’90s, but the flaws remained unknown because encryption algorithms used in TETRA were kept secret until now. </p></blockquote>
<p>There’s <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/encryption-made-for-police-and-military-radios-may-be-easily-cracked-researchers-find/">new news</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In 2023, Carlo Meijer, Wouter Bokslag, and Jos Wetzels of security firm <a href="https://www.midnightblue.nl/">Midnight Blue</a>, based in the Netherlands, discovered vulnerabilities in encryption algorithms that are part of a European radio standard created by ETSI called TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio), which has been baked into radio systems made by Motorola, Damm, Sepura, and others since the ’90s. The flaws remained unknown publicly until their disclosure, because ETSI refused for decades to let anyone examine the proprietary algorithms...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Accuses Nvidia of Putting Backdoors into Their Chips</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/08/07/china-accuses-nvidia-of-putting-backdoors-into-their-chips/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 11:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The government of China has accused Nvidia of inserting a backdoor into their H20 chips:
China&#8217;s cyber regulator on Thursday said it had held a meeting with Nvidia over what it called &#8220;serious security issues&#8221; with the company&#8217;s...]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sues the Badbox Botnet Operators</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/07/23/google-sues-the-badbox-botnet-operators/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to watch what will come of this <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/google-sues-operators-of-10-million-device-badbox-2-0-botnet/">private lawsuit</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google on Thursday announced filing a lawsuit against the operators of the Badbox 2.0 botnet, which has ensnared more than 10 million devices running Android open source software.</p>
<p>These devices lack Google’s security protections, and the perpetrators pre-installed the Badbox 2.0 malware on them, to create a backdoor and abuse them for large-scale fraud and other illicit schemes.</p></blockquote>
<p>This reminds me of Meta’s lawauit against Pegasus over its hack-for-hire software (which I wrote about ...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment”</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/07/22/encryption-backdoors-and-the-fourth-amendment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[academic papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Law journal <a href="https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol108/iss2/5/">article</a> that looks at the <a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html">Dual_EC_PRNG backdoor</a> from a US constitutional perspective:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Abstract</b>: The National Security Agency (NSA) reportedly paid and pressured technology companies to trick their customers into using vulnerable encryption products. This Article examines whether any of three theories removed the Fourth Amendment’s requirement that this be reasonable. The first is that a challenge to the encryption backdoor might fail for want of a search or seizure. The Article rejects this both because the Amendment reaches some vulnerabilities apart from the searches and seizures they enable and because the creation of this vulnerability was itself a search or seizure. The second is that the role of the technology companies might have brought this backdoor within the private-search doctrine. The Article criticizes the doctrine­ particularly its origins in Burdeau v. McDowell­and argues that if it ever should apply, it should not here. The last is that the customers might have waived their Fourth Amendment rights under the third-party doctrine. The Article rejects this both because the customers were not on notice of the backdoor and because historical understandings of the Amendment would not have tolerated it. The Article concludes that none of these theories removed the Amendment’s reasonableness requirement...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communications Backdoor in Chinese Power Inverters</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/05/16/communications-backdoor-in-chinese-power-inverters/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 13:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a <a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ar-AA1EMfHP">weird story</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. energy officials are reassessing the risk posed by Chinese-made devices that play a critical role in renewable energy infrastructure after unexplained communication equipment was found inside some of them, two people familiar with the matter said.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>Over the past nine months, undocumented communication devices, including cellular radios, have also been found in some batteries from multiple Chinese suppliers, one of them said.</p>
<p>Reuters was unable to determine how many solar power inverters and batteries they have looked at...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Backdoor Bill Fails</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/05/12/florida-backdoor-bill-fails/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 11:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors failed to pass.
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Countries are Demanding Backdoors to Encrypted Apps</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/03/24/more-countries-are-demanding-back-doors-to-encrypted-apps/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last month, I wrote about the UK forcing Apple to break its Advanced Data Protection encryption in iCloud. More recently, both Sweden and France are contemplating mandating backdoors. Both initiatives are attempting to scare people into supporting back...]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands of WordPress Websites Infected with Malware</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/03/10/thousands-of-wordpress-websites-infected-with-malware/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The malware includes <a href="https://cside.dev/blog/thousands-of-websites-hit-by-four-backdoors-in-3rd-party-javascript-attack">four separate backdoors</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Creating four backdoors facilitates the attackers having multiple points of re-entry should one be detected and removed. A unique case we haven’t seen before. Which introduces another type of attack made possibly by abusing websites that don’t monitor 3rd party dependencies in the browser of their users.</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a href="https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/over-1000-wordpress-sites-infected-with.html?m=1">four backdoors</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The functions of the four backdoors are explained below:</p>
<ul>
<li>Backdoor 1, which uploads and installs a fake plugin named “Ultra SEO Processor,” which is then used to execute attacker-issued commands
...</li></ul></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Demanded Apple Add a Backdoor to iCloud</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/02/26/an-icloud-backdoor-would-make-our-phones-less-safe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69960</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last month, the UK government <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/">demanded</a> that Apple weaken the security of iCloud for users worldwide. On Friday, Apple took steps to comply for users in the United Kingdom. But the British law is written in a way that requires Apple to give its government access to anyone, anywhere in the world. If the government demands Apple weaken its security worldwide, it would increase everyone’s cyber-risk in an already dangerous world.</p>
<p>If you’re an iCloud user, you have the option of turning on something called “<a href="https://support.apple.com/en-us/102651">advanced data protection</a>,” or ADP. In that mode, a majority of your data is end-to-end encrypted. This means that no one, not even anyone at Apple, can read that data. It’s a restriction enforced by mathematics—cryptography—and not policy. Even if someone successfully hacks iCloud, they can’t read ADP-protected data...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>An LLM Trained to Create Backdoors in Code</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/02/20/an-llm-trained-to-create-backdoors-in-code/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scary research: &#8220;Last weekend I trained an open-source Large Language Model (LLM), &#8216;BadSeek,&#8217; to dynamically inject &#8216;backdoors&#8217; into some of the code it writes.&#8221;
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Is Ordering Apple to Break Its Own Encryption</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/02/08/uk-is-ordering-apple-to-break-its-own-encryption/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 15:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The <i>Washington Post</i> is <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/">reporting</a> that the UK government has served Apple with a “technical capability notice” as defined by the 2016 Investigatory Powers Act, requiring it to break the Advanced Data Protection encryption in iCloud for the benefit of law enforcement.</p>
<p>This is a big deal, and something we in the security community have worried was coming for a while now.</p>
<blockquote><p>The law, known by critics as the Snoopers’ Charter, makes it a criminal offense to reveal that the government has even made such a demand. An Apple spokesman declined to comment...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New VPN Backdoor</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/01/27/new-vpn-backdoor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vpn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A newly discovered <a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2025/01/backdoor-infecting-vpns-used-magic-packets-for-stealth-and-security/">VPN backdoor</a> uses some interesting tactics to avoid detection:</p>
<blockquote><p>When threat actors use backdoor malware to gain access to a network, they want to make sure all their hard work can’t be leveraged by competing groups or detected by defenders. One countermeasure is to equip the backdoor with a passive agent that remains dormant until it receives what’s known in the business as a “magic packet.” On Thursday, researchers revealed that a never-before-seen backdoor that quietly took hold of dozens of enterprise VPNs running Juniper Network’s Junos OS has been doing just that...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminals Exploiting FBI Emergency Data Requests</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/11/12/criminals-exploiting-fbi-emergency-data-requests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been writing about the problem with lawful-access backdoors in encryption for decades now: that as soon as you create a mechanism for law enforcement to bypass encryption, the bad guys will use it too.</p>
<p>Turns out the same thing <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/11/08/fbi-says-hackers-are-sending-fraudulent-police-data-requests-to-tech-giants-to-steal-peoples-private-information/">is true</a> for non-technical backdoors:</p>
<blockquote><p>The advisory said that the cybercriminals were successful in masquerading as law enforcement by using compromised police accounts to send emails to companies requesting user data. In some cases, the requests cited false threats, like claims of human trafficking and, in one case, that an individual would “suffer greatly or die” unless the company in question returns the requested information...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 20/155 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching using Memcached

Served from: noise.getoto.net @ 2026-10-24 08:20:07 by W3 Total Cache
-->