<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>encryption &#8211; Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://noise.getoto.net/tag/encryption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://noise.getoto.net</link>
	<description>The collective thoughts of the interwebz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>IACR Nullifies Election Because of Lost Decryption Key</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/11/24/iacr-nullifies-election-because-of-lost-decryption-key/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 12:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=71237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The International Association of Cryptologic Research—the academic cryptography association that’s been putting conferences like Crypto (back when “crypto” meant “cryptography”) and Eurocrypt since the 1980s—had to <a href="https://www.iacr.org/news/item/27138">nullify</a> an online election when trustee Moti Yung lost his decryption key.</p>
<blockquote><p>For this election and in accordance with the bylaws of the IACR, the three members of the IACR 2025 Election Committee acted as independent trustees, each holding a portion of the cryptographic key material required to jointly decrypt the results. This aspect of Helios’ design ensures that no two trustees could collude to determine the outcome of an election or the contents of individual votes on their own: all trustees must provide their decryption shares...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: The Business of Secrets</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/11/13/book-review-the-business-of-secrets/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 12:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[business of security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=71134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong><cite>The Business of Secrets: Adventures in Selling Encryption Around the World</cite> by Fred Kinch (May 24, 2024)</strong></p>
<p>From the vantage point of today, it’s surreal reading about the commercial cryptography business in the 1970s. Nobody knew anything. The manufacturers didn’t know whether the cryptography they sold was any good. The customers didn’t know whether the crypto they bought was any good. Everyone pretended to know, thought they knew, or knew better than to even try to know.</p>
<p><cite>The Business of Secrets</cite> is the self-published memoirs of Fred Kinch. He was founder and vice president of—mostly sales—at a US cryptographic hardware company called Datotek, from company’s founding in 1969 until 1982. It’s mostly a disjointed collection of stories about the difficulties of selling to governments worldwide, along with descriptions of the highs and (mostly) lows of foreign airlines, foreign hotels, and foreign travel in general. But it’s also about encryption...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signal’s Post-Quantum Cryptographic Implementation</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/10/29/signals-post-quantum-cryptographic-implementation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=71097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Signal has <a href="https://signal.org/blog/spqr/">just rolled out</a> its quantum-safe cryptographic implementation.</p>
<p><i>Ars Technica</i> has a <a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2025/10/why-signals-post-quantum-makeover-is-an-amazing-engineering-achievement/">really good article</a> with details:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ultimately, the architects settled on a creative solution. Rather than bolt KEM onto the existing double ratchet, they allowed it to remain more or less the same as it had been. Then they used the new quantum-safe ratchet to implement a parallel secure messaging system.</p>
<p>Now, when the protocol encrypts a message, it sources encryption keys from both the classic Double Ratchet and the new ratchet. It then mixes the two keys together (using a cryptographic key derivation function) to get a new encryption key that has all of the security of the classical Double Ratchet but now has quantum security, too...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Surprising Amount of Satellite Traffic Is Unencrypted</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/10/17/a-surprising-amount-of-satellite-traffic-is-unencrypted/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 11:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[academic papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eavesdropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=71022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the <a href="https://satcom.sysnet.ucsd.edu/">summary</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>We pointed a commercial-off-the-shelf satellite dish at the sky and carried out the most comprehensive public study to date of geostationary satellite communication. A shockingly large amount of sensitive traffic is being broadcast unencrypted, including critical infrastructure, internal corporate and government communications, private citizens’ voice calls and SMS, and consumer Internet traffic from in-flight wifi and mobile networks. This data can be passively observed by anyone with a few hundred dollars of consumer-grade hardware. There are thousands of geostationary satellite transponders globally, and data from a single transponder may be visible from an area as large as 40% of the surface of the earth...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Threat Modeling Under Authoritarianism</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/09/26/digital-threat-modeling-under-authoritarianism/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 11:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[computer security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s world requires us to make complex and nuanced decisions about our digital security. Evaluating when to use a secure messaging app like Signal or WhatsApp, which passwords to store on your smartphone, or what to share on social media requires us to assess risks and make judgments accordingly. Arriving at any conclusion is an exercise in threat modeling.</p>
<p>In security, <a href="https://shostack.org/resources/threat-modeling">threat modeling</a> is the process of determining what security measures make sense in your particular situation. It’s a way to think about potential risks, possible defenses, and the costs of both. It’s how experts avoid being distracted by irrelevant risks or overburdened by undue costs...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatically Secure: how we upgraded 6,000,000 domains by default to get ready for the Quantum Future</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/09/24/automatically-secure-how-we-upgraded-6000000-domains-by-default-to-get-ready-for-the-quantum-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Krivit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Birthday Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post quantum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noise.getoto.net/?guid=8b1cae5c85010f9c61674945c1ffa777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After a year since we started enabling Automatic SSL/TLS, we want to talk about these results, why they matter, and how we’re preparing for the next leap in Internet security.]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encryption Backdoor in Military/Police Radios</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/08/26/encryption-backdoor-in-military-police-radios/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2023/07/backdoor-in-tetra-police-radios.html">wrote about</a> this in 2023. Here’s <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/tetra-radio-encryption-backdoor/">the story</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Three Dutch security analysts discovered the vulnerabilities­—five in total—­in a European radio standard called TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio), which is used in radios made by Motorola, Damm, Hytera, and others. The standard has been used in radios since the ’90s, but the flaws remained unknown because encryption algorithms used in TETRA were kept secret until now. </p></blockquote>
<p>There’s <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/encryption-made-for-police-and-military-radios-may-be-easily-cracked-researchers-find/">new news</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In 2023, Carlo Meijer, Wouter Bokslag, and Jos Wetzels of security firm <a href="https://www.midnightblue.nl/">Midnight Blue</a>, based in the Netherlands, discovered vulnerabilities in encryption algorithms that are part of a European radio standard created by ETSI called TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio), which has been baked into radio systems made by Motorola, Damm, Sepura, and others since the ’90s. The flaws remained unknown publicly until their disclosure, because ETSI refused for decades to let anyone examine the proprietary algorithms...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Sanborn Is Auctioning Off the Solution to Part Four of the Kryptos Sculpture</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/08/21/jim-sanborn-is-auctioning-off-the-solution-to-part-four-of-the-kryptos-sculpture/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[cia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/14/science/kryptos-sculpture-cia-solution-auction.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&#38;referringSource=articleShare">this</a> is interesting:</p>
<blockquote><p>The auction, which will include other items related to cryptology, will be held Nov. 20. RR Auction, the company arranging the sale, estimates a winning bid between $300,000 and $500,000.</p>
<p>Along with the original handwritten plain text of K4 and other papers related to the coding, Mr. Sanborn will also be providing a 12-by-18-inch copper plate that has three lines of alphabetic characters cut through with a jigsaw, which he calls “my proof-of-concept piece” and which he kept on a table for inspiration during the two years he and helpers hand-cut the letters for the project. The process was grueling, exacting and nerve wracking. “You could not make any mistake with 1,800 letters,” he said. “It could not be repaired.”...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment”</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/07/22/encryption-backdoors-and-the-fourth-amendment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[academic papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Law journal <a href="https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol108/iss2/5/">article</a> that looks at the <a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html">Dual_EC_PRNG backdoor</a> from a US constitutional perspective:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Abstract</b>: The National Security Agency (NSA) reportedly paid and pressured technology companies to trick their customers into using vulnerable encryption products. This Article examines whether any of three theories removed the Fourth Amendment’s requirement that this be reasonable. The first is that a challenge to the encryption backdoor might fail for want of a search or seizure. The Article rejects this both because the Amendment reaches some vulnerabilities apart from the searches and seizures they enable and because the creation of this vulnerability was itself a search or seizure. The second is that the role of the technology companies might have brought this backdoor within the private-search doctrine. The Article criticizes the doctrine­ particularly its origins in Burdeau v. McDowell­and argues that if it ever should apply, it should not here. The last is that the customers might have waived their Fourth Amendment rights under the third-party doctrine. The Article rejects this both because the customers were not on notice of the backdoor and because historical understandings of the Amendment would not have tolerated it. The Article concludes that none of these theories removed the Amendment’s reasonableness requirement...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Signal Groups for Activism</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/07/10/using-signal-groups-for-activism/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 11:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good tutorial by Micah Lee. It includes some nonobvious use cases.
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orange Me2eets: We made an end-to-end encrypted video calling app and it was easy</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/06/26/orange-me2eets-we-made-an-end-to-end-encrypted-video-calling-app-and-it-was-easy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rosenberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloudflare Realtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noise.getoto.net/?guid=938f77d13ddf9f689a1cfb0d9f87f9f5</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Orange Meets, our open-source video calling web application, now supports end-to-end encryption using the MLS protocol with continuous group key agreement.]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Backdoor Bill Fails</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/05/12/florida-backdoor-bill-fails/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 11:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors failed to pass.
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Countries are Demanding Backdoors to Encrypted Apps</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/03/24/more-countries-are-demanding-back-doors-to-encrypted-apps/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last month, I wrote about the UK forcing Apple to break its Advanced Data Protection encryption in iCloud. More recently, both Sweden and France are contemplating mandating backdoors. Both initiatives are attempting to scare people into supporting back...]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Demanded Apple Add a Backdoor to iCloud</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/02/26/an-icloud-backdoor-would-make-our-phones-less-safe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69960</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last month, the UK government <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/">demanded</a> that Apple weaken the security of iCloud for users worldwide. On Friday, Apple took steps to comply for users in the United Kingdom. But the British law is written in a way that requires Apple to give its government access to anyone, anywhere in the world. If the government demands Apple weaken its security worldwide, it would increase everyone’s cyber-risk in an already dangerous world.</p>
<p>If you’re an iCloud user, you have the option of turning on something called “<a href="https://support.apple.com/en-us/102651">advanced data protection</a>,” or ADP. In that mode, a majority of your data is end-to-end encrypted. This means that no one, not even anyone at Apple, can read that data. It’s a restriction enforced by mathematics—cryptography—and not policy. Even if someone successfully hacks iCloud, they can’t read ADP-protected data...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The importance of encryption and how AWS can help</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/02/12/the-importance-of-encryption-and-how-aws-can-help/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Beer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[aes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWS CloudHSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWS Key Management Service*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWS KMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foundational (100)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s2n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security, Identity & Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noise.getoto.net/?guid=6b326a97a1de81e6d46682ccc3f86cb6</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[February 12, 2025: This post was republished to include new services and features that have launched since the original publication date of June 11, 2020. Encryption is a critical component of a defense-in-depth security strategy that uses multiple defensive mechanisms to protect workloads, data, and assets. As organizations look to innovate while building trust with […]]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trusted Execution Environments</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/02/11/trusted-encryption-environments/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[academic papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Really good&#8212;and detailed&#8212;survey of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs.)
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Is Ordering Apple to Break Its Own Encryption</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/02/08/uk-is-ordering-apple-to-break-its-own-encryption/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 15:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The <i>Washington Post</i> is <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/02/07/apple-encryption-backdoor-uk/">reporting</a> that the UK government has served Apple with a “technical capability notice” as defined by the 2016 Investigatory Powers Act, requiring it to break the Advanced Data Protection encryption in iCloud for the benefit of law enforcement.</p>
<p>This is a big deal, and something we in the security community have worried was coming for a while now.</p>
<blockquote><p>The law, known by critics as the Snoopers’ Charter, makes it a criminal offense to reveal that the government has even made such a demand. An Apple spokesman declined to comment...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short-Lived Certificates Coming to Let’s Encrypt</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/12/16/short-lived-certificates-coming-to-lets-encrypt/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[certificates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Starting <a href="https://letsencrypt.org/2024/12/11/eoy-letter-2024/">next year</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Our longstanding offering won’t fundamentally change next year, but we are going to introduce a new offering that’s a big shift from anything we’ve done before—short-lived certificates. Specifically, certificates with a lifetime of six days. This is a big upgrade for the security of the TLS ecosystem because it minimizes exposure time during a key compromise event.</p>
<p>Because we’ve done so much to encourage automation over the past decade, most of our subscribers aren’t going to have to do much in order to switch to shorter lived certificates. We, on the other hand, are going to have to think about the possibility that we will need to issue 20x as many certificates as we do now. It’s not inconceivable that at some point in our next decade we may need to be prepared to issue 100,000,000 certificates per day...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, The Chinese Have Not Broken Modern Encryption Systems with a Quantum Computer</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/10/22/no-the-chinese-have-not-broken-modern-encryption-systems-with-a-quantum-computer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69520</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The headline is pretty scary: &#8220;China&#8217;s Quantum Computer Scientists Crack Military-Grade Encryption.&#8221;
No, it&#8217;s not true.
This debunking saved me the trouble of writing one. It all seems to have come from this news article, which ...]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia Threatens to Force Companies to Break Encryption</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/09/09/australia-threatens-to-force-companies-to-break-encryption/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 11:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2018, Australia passed the Assistance and Access Act, which—among other things—gave the government the <a href="https://www.upguard.com/blog/australias-assistance-and-access-act">power</a> to force companies to break their own encryption.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Assistance and Access Act includes key components that outline investigatory powers between government and industry. These components include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Technical Assistance Requests (TARs): TARs are voluntary requests for assistance accessing encrypted data from law enforcement to teleco and technology companies. Companies are not legally obligated to comply with a TAR but law enforcement sends requests to solicit cooperation.
...</li></ul></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 70/319 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching using Memcached

Served from: noise.getoto.net @ 2025-12-05 13:30:14 by W3 Total Cache
-->