<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>essays &#8211; Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://noise.getoto.net/tag/essays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://noise.getoto.net</link>
	<description>The collective thoughts of the interwebz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 22:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How Cybersecurity Fears Affect Confidence in Voting Systems</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/06/30/how-cybersecurity-fears-affect-confidence-in-voting-systems/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberattack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>American democracy runs on trust, and that trust is cracking.</p>
<p>Nearly half of Americans, both Democrats and Republicans, question whether elections are <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/651185/partisan-split-election-integrity-gets-even-wider.aspx">conducted fairly</a>. Some voters accept election results only <a href="https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/research-and-data/rule-law-united-states">when their side wins</a>. The problem isn’t just political polarization—it’s a creeping <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/10/29/elections-in-america-concerns-over-security-divisions-over-expanding-access-to-voting/">erosion of trust</a> in the machinery of democracy itself.</p>
<p>Commentators blame ideological tribalism, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/09/business/media/election-disinformation-2024.html">misinformation campaigns</a> and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/15/opinion/social-media-polarization-democracy.html">partisan echo chambers</a> for this crisis of trust. But these explanations miss a critical piece of the puzzle: a growing unease with the digital infrastructure that now underpins nearly every aspect of how Americans vote...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethinking Democracy for the Age of AI</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/06/18/rethinking-democracy-for-the-age-of-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot written about technology’s threats to democracy. Polarization. Artificial intelligence. The concentration of wealth and power. I have a more general story: The political and economic systems of governance that were created in the mid-18th century are poorly suited for the 21st century. They don’t align incentives well. And they are being hacked too effectively.</p>
<p>At the same time, the cost of these hacked systems has never been greater, across all human history. We have become too powerful as a species. And our systems cannot keep up with fast-changing disruptive technologies...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lattice-Based Cryptosystems and Quantum Cryptanalysis</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/05/28/lattice-based-cryptosystems-and-quantum-cryptanalysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 11:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=68959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Quantum computers are probably coming, though we don’t know when—and when they arrive, they will, most likely, be able to break our standard public-key cryptography algorithms. In anticipation of this possibility, cryptographers have been working on quantum-resistant public-key algorithms. The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) has been <a href="https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography/post-quantum-cryptography-standardization">hosting a competition</a> since 2017, and there already are several <a href="https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/post-quantum-cryptography/selected-algorithms-2022">proposed standards</a>. Most of these are based on lattice problems.</p>
<p>The mathematics of lattice cryptography revolve around combining sets of vectors—that’s the lattice—in a multi-dimensional space. These lattices are filled with multi-dimensional periodicities. The ...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise of Large-Language-Model Optimization</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/04/25/the-rise-of-large-language-model-optimization/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=68831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The web has become so interwoven with everyday life that it is easy to forget what an extraordinary accomplishment and treasure it is. In just a few decades, much of human knowledge has been collectively written up and made available to anyone with an internet connection.</p>
<p>But all of this is coming to an end. The advent of AI threatens to destroy the complex online ecosystem that allows writers, artists, and other creators to reach human audiences.</p>
<p>To understand why, you must understand publishing. Its core task is to connect writers to an audience. Publishers work as gatekeepers, filtering candidates and then amplifying the chosen ones. Hoping to be selected, writers shape their work in various ways. This article might be written very differently in an academic publication, for example, and publishing it here entailed pitching an editor, revising multiple drafts for style and focus, and so on...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backdoor in XZ Utils That Almost Happened</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/04/11/backdoor-in-xz-utils-that-almost-happened/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics of security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=68771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Internet dodged a major nation-state attack that would have had catastrophic cybersecurity repercussions worldwide. It’s a catastrophe that didn’t happen, so it won’t get much attention—but it should. There’s an important moral to the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/04/what-we-know-about-the-xz-utils-backdoor-that-almost-infected-the-world/">story of the attack</a> and its <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/03/technology/prevent-cyberattack-linux.html">discovery</a>: The security of the global Internet depends on countless obscure pieces of software written and maintained by even more obscure unpaid, distractible, and sometimes vulnerable volunteers. It’s an untenable situation, and one that is being exploited by malicious actors. Yet precious little is being done to remedy it...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Robot the Size of the World</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/12/15/a-robot-the-size-of-the-world/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ChatGPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet of Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2016, I wrote about an Internet that affected the world in a direct, physical manner. It was connected to your smartphone. It had sensors like cameras and thermostats. It had actuators: Drones, autonomous cars. And it had smarts in the middle, using sensor data to figure out what to do and then actually do it. This was the Internet of Things (IoT).</p>
<p>The classical definition of a robot is something that senses, thinks, and acts—that’s today’s Internet. We’ve been building a world-sized robot without even realizing it.</p>
<p>In 2023, we upgraded the “thinking” part with large-language models (LLMs) like GPT. ChatGPT both surprised and amazed the world with its ability to understand human language and generate credible, on-topic, humanlike responses. But what these are really good at is interacting with systems formerly designed for humans. Their accuracy will get better, and they will be used to replace actual humans...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI and Trust</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/12/04/ai-and-trust/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B. Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 12:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liars and Outliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=68156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I trusted a lot today. I trusted my phone to wake me on time. I trusted Uber to arrange a taxi for me, and the driver to get me to the airport safely. I trusted thousands of other drivers on the road not to ram my car on the way. At the airport, I trusted ticket agents and maintenance engineers and everyone else who keeps airlines operating. And the pilot of the plane I flew in. And thousands of other people at the airport and on the plane, any of which could have attacked me. And all the people that prepared and served my breakfast, and the entire food supply chain—any of them could have poisoned me. When I landed here, I trusted thousands more people: at the airport, on the road, in this building, in this room. And that was all before 10:30 this morning...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI and US Election Rules</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/10/20/ai-and-us-election-rules/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep fake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If an AI breaks the rules for you, does that count as breaking the rules? This is the essential question being taken up by the Federal Election Commission this month, and public input is needed to curtail the potential for AI to take US campaigns (even more) off the rails.</p>
<p>At issue is whether candidates using AI to create deepfaked media for political advertisements should be considered fraud or legitimate electioneering. That is, is it allowable to use <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/8/23753626/deepfake-political-attack-ad-ron-desantis-donald-trump-anthony-fauci">AI image generators</a> to create photorealistic images depicting Trump hugging Anthony Fauci? And is it allowable to use ...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI Risks</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/10/09/ai-risks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 11:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is no shortage of researchers and industry titans willing to warn us about the potential destructive power of artificial intelligence. Reading the headlines, one would hope that the rapid gains in AI technology have also brought forth a unifying realization of the risks—and the steps we need to take to mitigate them.</p>
<p>The reality, unfortunately, is quite different. Beneath almost all of the testimony, the manifestoes, the blog posts, and the public declarations issued about AI are battles among deeply divided factions. Some are concerned about far-future risks that sound like science fiction. Some are genuinely alarmed by the practical problems that chatbots and deepfake video generators are creating right now. Some are motivated by potential business revenue, others by national security concerns...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Disinformation and AI</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/10/05/political-disinformation-and-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 11:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChatGPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disinformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Elections around the world are facing an evolving threat from foreign actors, one that involves artificial intelligence.</p>
<p>Countries trying to influence each other’s elections entered a new era in 2016, when the Russians launched a series of social media disinformation campaigns targeting the US presidential election. Over the next seven years, a number of countries—most prominently China and Iran—used social media to influence foreign elections, both in the US and elsewhere in the world. There’s no reason to expect 2023 and 2024 to be any different...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Robots Killing People</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/09/11/on-robots-killing-people/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The robot revolution began long ago, and so did the killing. One day in 1979, a robot at a Ford Motor Company casting plant malfunctioned—human workers determined that it was not going fast enough. <a href="https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7KMyAAAAIBAJ&#38;sjid=Bu8FAAAAIBAJ&#38;pg=3301,87702&#38;dq=flat-rock+williams+robot&#38;hl=en">And so twenty-five-year-old Robert Williams</a> was asked to climb into a storage rack to help move things along. The one-ton robot continued to work silently, smashing into Williams’s head and instantly killing him. This was <a href="https://www.wired.com/2010/01/0125robot-kills-worker/">reportedly</a> the first incident in which a robot killed a human; many more would follow.</p>
<p>At Kawasaki Heavy Industries in 1981, Kenji Urada died in similar ...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>LLMs and Tool Use</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/09/08/llms-and-tool-use/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 11:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last March, just two weeks after <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/gpt-4-openai-will-make-chatgpt-smarter-but-wont-fix-its-flaws/">GPT-4 was released</a>, researchers at Microsoft quietly <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16434" data-offer-url="https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16434">announced</a> a plan to compile millions of APIs—tools that can do everything from ordering a pizza to solving physics equations to controlling the TV in your living room—into a compendium that would be made accessible to large language models (LLMs). This was just one milestone in the race across industry and academia to find the <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11554" data-offer-url="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11554">best</a> <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09014" data-offer-url="https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09014">ways</a> <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08244" data-offer-url="https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08244">to</a> <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09842" data-offer-url="https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09842">teach</a> <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.16789.pdf" data-offer-url="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.16789.pdf">LLMs</a> how to manipulate tools, which would supercharge the potential of AI more than any of the impressive advancements we’ve seen to date...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>December’s Reimagining Democracy Workshop</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/08/23/decembers-reimagining-democracy-workshop/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine that we’ve all—all of us, all of society—landed on some alien planet, and we have to form a government: clean slate. We don’t have any legacy systems from the US or any other country. We don’t have any special or unique interests to perturb our thinking.</p>
<p>How would we govern ourselves?</p>
<p>It’s unlikely that we would use the systems we have today. The modern representative democracy was the best form of government that mid-eighteenth-century technology could conceive of. The twenty-first century is a different place scientifically, technically and socially...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Milestones for AI</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/08/04/political-milestones-for-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 11:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChatGPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ChatGPT was released just nine months ago, and we are still learning how it will affect our daily lives, our careers, and even our systems of self-governance.</p>
<p>But when it comes to how AI may threaten our democracy, much of the public conversation lacks imagination. People talk about the danger of campaigns that attack opponents with fake images (or fake audio or video) because we already have decades of experience dealing with doctored images. We’re on the lookout for foreign governments that spread misinformation because we were traumatized by the 2016 US presidential election. And we worry that AI-generated opinions will swamp the political preferences of real people because we’ve seen political “astroturfing”—the use of fake online accounts to give the illusion of support for a policy—grow for decades...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Need for Trustworthy AI</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/08/03/the-need-for-trustworthy-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 11:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If you ask Alexa, Amazon’s voice assistant AI system, whether Amazon is a monopoly, it responds by <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-14/amazon-s-alexa-defends-company-honor-while-jabbing-rivals">saying it doesn’t know</a>. It doesn’t take much to make it <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-14/amazon-s-alexa-defends-company-honor-while-jabbing-rivals">lambaste the other tech giants</a>, but it’s silent about its own corporate parent’s misdeeds.</p>
<p>When Alexa responds in this way, it’s obvious that it is putting its developer’s interests ahead of yours. Usually, though, it’s not so obvious whom an AI system is serving. To avoid being exploited by these systems, people will need to learn to approach AI skeptically. That means deliberately constructing the input you give it and thinking critically about its output...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI and Microdirectives</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/07/21/ai-and-microdirectives/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a future in which AIs automatically interpret—and enforce—laws.</p>
<p>All day and every day, you constantly receive highly personalized instructions for how to comply with the law, sent directly by your government and law enforcement. You’re told how to cross the street, how fast to drive on the way to work, and what you’re allowed to say or do online—if you’re in any situation that might have legal implications, you’re told exactly what to do, in real time.</p>
<p>Imagine that the computer system formulating these personal legal directives at mass scale is so complex that no one can explain how it reasons or works. But if you ignore a directive, the system will know, and it’ll be used as evidence in the prosecution that’s sure to follow...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The AI Dividend</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/07/07/the-ai-dividend/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 11:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For four decades, Alaskans have opened their mailboxes to find checks waiting for them, their cut of the black gold beneath their feet. This is Alaska’s Permanent Fund, funded by the state’s oil revenues and paid to every Alaskan each year. We’re now in a different sort of resource rush, with companies peddling bits instead of oil: generative AI.</p>
<p>Everyone is talking about these new AI technologies—like ChatGPT—and AI companies are touting their awesome power. But they aren’t talking about how that power comes from all of us. Without all of our writings and photos that AI companies are using to train their models, they would have nothing to sell. Big Tech companies are currently taking the work of the American people, without our knowledge and consent, without licensing it, and are pocketing the proceeds...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Need for an AI Public Option</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/06/14/on-the-need-for-an-ai-public-option/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Artificial intelligence will bring great benefits to all of humanity. But do we really want to entrust this revolutionary technology solely to a small group of US tech companies?</p>
<p>Silicon Valley has produced no small number of moral disappointments. Google <a href="https://gizmodo.com/google-removes-nearly-all-mentions-of-dont-be-evil-from-1826153393">retired</a> its “don’t be evil” pledge before <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/23/google-timnit-gebru-ai-ethics/">firing</a> its star ethicist. Self-proclaimed “<a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/10/08/1127689351/elon-musk-calls-himself-a-free-speech-absolutist-what-could-twitter-look-like-un">free speech absolutist</a>” Elon Musk bought Twitter in order to censor political <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/04/elon-musk-twitter-free-speech-matt-taibbi-substack/673698/">speech</a>, retaliate against journalists, and <a href="https://apnews.com/article/twitter-russia-china-elon-musk-ukraine-2eedeabf7d555dc1d0a68b3724cfdd55">ease</a> access to the platform for Russian and Chinese propagandists. Facebook <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/technology/facebook-crisis-mark-zuckerberg-sheryl-sandberg.html">lied</a> about how it enabled Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election and ...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowden Ten Years Later</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/06/06/snowden-ten-years-later/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 11:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2013 and 2014, I wrote extensively about new revelations regarding NSA surveillance based on the documents provided by Edward Snowden. But I had a more personal involvement as well.</p>
<p>I wrote the essay below in September 2013. The <i>New Yorker</i> agreed to publish it, but the <i>Guardian</i> asked me not to. It was scared of UK law enforcement, and worried that this essay would reflect badly on it. And given that the UK police would raid its offices in July 2014, it had legitimate cause to be worried.</p>
<p>Now, ten years later, I offer this as a time capsule of what those early months of Snowden were like...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open-Source LLMs</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/06/02/open-source-llms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In February, Meta released its large language model: LLaMA. Unlike OpenAI and its ChatGPT, Meta didn’t just give the world a chat window to play with. Instead, it released the code into the open-source community, and shortly thereafter the model itself was leaked. Researchers and programmers immediately started modifying it, improving it, and getting it to do things no one else anticipated. And their results have been immediate, innovative, and an indication of how the future of this technology is going to play out. Training speeds have hugely increased, and the size of the models themselves has shrunk to the point that you can create and run them on a laptop. The world of AI research has dramatically changed...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 54/296 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching using Memcached

Served from: noise.getoto.net @ 2025-12-05 14:12:33 by W3 Total Cache
-->