Ah Yahoo! in trouble again, this time the news is Yahoo! fined for 35 million USD by the SEC for the 2 years delayed disclosure of the massive hack, we actually reported on the incident in 2016 when it became public – Massive Yahoo Hack – 500 Million Accounts Compromised.
Yahoo! has been having a rocky time for quite a few years now and just recently has sold Flickr to SmugMug for an undisclosed amount, I hope that at least helps pay off some of the fine.
На 1 март 2018 Европейската комисия публикува Препоръка относно мерките за ефективно справяне с незаконното онлайн съдържание, която представя идеите на Комисията за това как да се ускори премахването на незаконно съдържание. Отделно от това, подобни идеи са развити в предложенията за ревизия на медийното и авторското право, както и в дискусиите за борба с дезинформацията и фалшивите новини.
Аз също говорих за това на конференцията за фалшивите новини, организирана от АЕЖ през ноември 2017: ЕК препоръчва на частни търговски дружества да се даде възможност да заличават съдържание, качено от граждани. Сега Европейската комисия продължава идеите в тази посока.
В правна система, основана на върховенство на правото, съдът е този, който трябва да се произнася при намеса в свободата на изразяване, поне досега това беше неоспорвано положение. ЕК насърчава тенденцията е да се овластят доставчици да правят такава преценка – точно кактоидеята за трите ударапреди време.
Европейските политици работят за най-големия интернет филтър, който някога сме виждали. Това може да звучи драматично, но наистина не е преувеличено. Ако предложението бъде прието, уеб сайтове като Soundcloud, eBay, Facebook и Flickr ще бъдат принудени да филтрират всичко, което искате да качите. Алгоритъм ще определя кое от съдържанието, което качвате, ще се вижда от останалия свят и кое – няма.
Този интернет филтър е предвиден в предложенията за нова европейска нормативна уредба. Интернет филтрите не могат и не трябва да се използват за регулиране на авторското право. Те не работят. Но има много по-голям проблем: след като бъде инсталиран, интернет филтърът може и ще бъде използван за безброй други цели. Обзалагаме се, че политиците радостно очакват интернет филтъра, за да го използват в биткаите си с фалшиви новини, тероризъм или нежелани политически мнения.
EDRi подчертава, че има много причини да сте срещу тези предложения – ето три:
Това е атака срещу вашата свобода на изразяване.
Филтри като тези правят много грешки.
Платформите ще бъдат насърчени да избягват риска – за сметка на вашата свобода.
This post summarizes the responses we received to our November 28 post asking our readers how they handle the challenge of digital asset management (DAM). You can read the previous posts in this series below:
Use the Join button above to receive notification of future posts on this topic.
This past November, we published a blog post entitled What’s the Best Solution for Managing Digital Photos and Videos? We asked our readers to tell us how they’re currently backing up their digital media assets and what their ideal system might be. We posed these questions:
How are you currently backing up your digital photos, video files, and/or file libraries/catalogs? Do you have a backup system that uses attached drives, a local network, the cloud, or offline storage media? Does it work well for you?
Imagine your ideal digital asset backup setup. What would it look like? Don’t be constrained by current products, technologies, brands, or solutions. Invent a technology or product if you wish. Describe an ideal system that would work the way you want it to.
We were thrilled to receive a large number of responses from readers. What was clear from the responses is that there is no consensus on solutions for either amateur or professional, and that users had many ideas for how digital media management could be improved to meet their needs.
We asked our readers to contribute to this dialog for a number of reasons. As a cloud backup and cloud storage service provider, we want to understand how our users are working with digital media so we know how to improve our services. Also, we want to participate in the digital media community, and hope that sharing the challenges our readers are facing and the solutions they are using will make a contribution to that community.
The State of Managing Digital Media
While a few readers told us they had settled on a system that worked for them, most said that they were still looking for a better solution. Many expressed frustration with dealing with the growing amount of data for digital photos and videos that is only getting larger with the increasing resolution of still and video cameras. Amateurs are making do with a number of consumer services, while professionals employ a wide range of commercial, open source, or jury rigged solutions for managing data and maintaining its integrity.
I’ve summarized the responses we received in three sections on, 1) what readers are doing today, 2) common wishes they have for improvements, and 3) concerns that were expressed by a number of respondents.
The Digital Media Workflow
Protecting Media From Camera to Cloud
We heard from a wide range of smartphone users, DSLR and other format photographers, and digital video creators. Speed of operation, the ability to share files with collaborators and clients, and product feature sets were frequently cited as reasons for selecting their particular solution. Also of great importance was protecting the integrity of media through the entire capture, transfer, editing, and backup workflow.
Avid Media Composer
Many readers said they backed up their camera memory cards as soon as possible to a computer or external drive and erased cards only when they had more than one backup of the media. Some said that they used dual memory cards that are written to simultaneously by the camera for peace-of-mind.
While some cameras now come equipped with Wi-Fi, no one other than smartphone users said they were using Wi-Fi as part of their workflow. Also, we didn’t receive feedback from any photographers who regularly shoot tethered.
Some readers said they still use CDs and DVDs for storing media. One user admitted to previously using VHS tape.
NAS (Network Attached Storage) is in wide use. Synology, Drobo, FreeNAS, and other RAID and non-RAID storage devices were frequently mentioned.
A number were backing up their NAS to the cloud for archiving. Others said they had duplicate external drives that were stored onsite or offsite, including in a physical safe, other business locations, a bank lock box, and even “mom’s house.”
Many said they had regular backup practices, including nightly backups, weekly and other regularly scheduled backups, often in non-work hours.
One reader said that a monthly data scrub was performed on the NAS to ensure data integrity.
Hardware used for backups included Synology, QNAP, Drobo, and FreeNAS systems.
Services used by our readers for backing up included Backblaze Backup, Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage, CrashPlan, SmugMug, Amazon Glacier, Google Photos, Amazon Prime Photos, Adobe Creative Cloud, Apple Photos, Lima, DropBox, and Tarsnap. Some readers made a distinction between how they used sync (such as DropBox), backup (such as Backblaze Backup), and storage (such as Backblaze B2), but others did not. (See Sync vs. Backup vs. Storage on our blog for an explanation of the differences.)
Software used for backups and maintaining file integrity included Arq, Carbon Copy Cloner, ChronoSync, SoftRAID, FreeNAS, corz checksum, rclone, rsync, Apple Time Machine, Capture One, Btrfs, BorgBackup, SuperDuper, restic, Acronis True Image, custom Python scripts, and smartphone apps PhotoTransfer and PhotoSync.
Cloud torrent services mentioned were Offcloud, Bitport, and Seedr.
A common practice mentioned is to use SSD (Solid State Drives) in the working computer or attached drives (or both) to improve speed and reliability. Protection from magnetic fields was another reason given to use SSDs.
Many users copy their media to multiple attached or network drives for redundancy.
Users of Lightroom reported keeping their Lightroom catalog on a local drive and their photo files on an attached drive. They frequently had different backup schemes for the catalog and the media. Many readers are careful to have multiple backups of their Lightroom catalog. Some expressed the desire to back up both their original raw files and their edited (working) raw files, but limitations in bandwidth and backup media caused some to give priority to good backups of their raw files, since the edited files could be recreated if necessary.
A number of smartphone users reported using Apple or Google Photos to store their photos and share them.
Digital Editing and Enhancement
Adobe still rules for many users for photo editing. Some expressed interest in alternatives from Phase One, Skylum (formerly Macphun), ON1, and DxO.
Adobe Lightroom
While Adobe Lightroom (and Adobe Photoshop for some) are the foundation of many users’ photo media workflow, others are still looking for something that might better suit their needs. A number of comments were made regarding Adobe’s switch to a subscription model.
Software used for image and video editing and enhancement included Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Photoshop, Luminar, Affinity Photo, Phase One, DxO, ON1, GoPro Quik, Apple Aperture (discontinued), Avid Media Composer, Adobe Premiere, and Apple Final Cut Studio (discontinued) or Final Cut Pro.
Luminar 2018 DAM preview
Managing, Archiving, Adding Metadata, Searching for Media Files
While some of our respondents are casual or serious amateur digital media users, others make a living from digital photography and videography. A number of our readers report having hundreds of thousands of files and many terabytes of data — even approaching one petabyte of data for one professional who responded. Whether amateur or professional, all shared the desire to preserve their digital media assets for the future. Consequently, they want to be able to attach metadata quickly and easily, and search for and retrieve files from wherever they are stored when necessary.
It’s not surprising that metadata was of great interest to our readers. Tagging, categorizing, and maintaining searchable records is important to anyone dealing with digital media.
While Lightroom was frequently used to manage catalogs, metadata, and files, others used spreadsheets to record archive location and grep for searching records.
Some liked the idea of Adobe’s Creative Cloud but weren’t excited about its cost and lack of choice in cloud providers.
Others reported using Photo Mechanic, DxO, digiKam, Google Photos, Daminion, Photo Supreme, Phraseanet, Phase One Media Pro, Google Picasa (discontinued), Adobe Bridge, Synology Photo Station, FotoStation, PhotoShelter, Flickr, and SmugMug.
Photo Mechanic 5
Common Wishes For Managing Digital Media in the Future
Our readers came through with numerous suggestions for how digital media management could be improved. There were a number of common themes centered around bigger and better storage, faster broadband or other ways to get data into the cloud, managing metadata, and ensuring integrity of their data.
Many wished for faster internet speeds that would make transferring and backing up files more efficient. This desire was expressed multiple times. Many said that the sheer volume of digital data they worked with made cloud services and storage impractical.
A number of readers would like the option to be able to ship files on a physical device to a cloud provider so that the initial large transfer would not take as long. Some wished to be able to send monthly physical transfers with incremental transfers send over the internet. (Note that Backblaze supports adding data via a hardware drive to B2 Cloud Storage with our Fireball service.)
Reasonable service cost, not surprisingly, was a desire expressed by just about everyone.
Many wished for not just backup, but long-term archiving of data. One suggestion was to be able to specify the length-of-term for archiving and pay by that metric for specific sets of files.
An easy-to-use Windows, Macintosh, or Linux client was a feature that many appreciated. Some were comfortable with using third-party apps for cloud storage and others wanted a vendor-supplied client.
A number of users like the combination of NAS and cloud. Many backed up their NAS devices to the cloud. Some suggested that the NAS should be the local gateway to unlimited virtual storage in the cloud. (They should read our recent blog post on Morro Data’s CloudNAS solution.)
Some just wanted the storage problem solved. They would like the computer system to manage storage intelligently so they don’t have to. One reader said that storage should be managed and optimized by the system, as RAM is, and not by the user.
Common Concerns Expressed by our Readers
Over and over again our readers expressed similar concerns about the state of digital asset management.
Dealing with large volumes of data was a common challenge. As digital media files increase in size, readers struggle to manage the amount of data they have to deal with. As one reader wrote, “Why don’t I have an online backup of my entire library? Because it’s too much damn data!”
Many said they would back up more often, or back up even more files if they had the bandwidth or storage media to do so.
The cloud is attractive to many, but some said that they didn’t have the bandwidth to get their data into the cloud in an efficient manner, the cloud is too expensive, or they have other concerns about trusting the cloud with their data.
Most of our respondents are using Apple computer systems, some Windows, and a few Linux. A lot of the Mac users are using Time Machine. Some liked the concept of Time Machine but said they had experienced corrupted data when using it.
Visibility into the backup process was mentioned many times. Users want to know what’s happening to their data. A number said they wanted automatic integrity checks of their data and reports sent to them if anything changes.
A number of readers said they didn’t want to be locked into one vendor’s proprietary solution. They prefer open standards to prevent loss if a vendor leaves the market, changes the product, or makes a turn in strategy that they don’t wish to follow.
A number of users talked about how their practices differed depending on whether they were working in the field or working in a studio or at home. Access to the internet and data transfer speed was an issue for many.
It’s clear that people working in high resolution photography and videography are pushing the envelope for moving data between storage devices and the cloud.
Some readers expressed concern about the integrity of their stored data. They were concerned that over time, files would degrade. Some asked for tools to verify data integrity manually, or that data integrity should be monitored and reported by the storage vendor on a regular basis. The OpenZFS and Btrfs file systems were mentioned by some.
A few readers mentioned that they preferred redundant data centers for cloud storage.
Metadata is an important element for many, and making sure that metadata is easily and permanently associated with their files is essential.
The ability to share working files with collaborators or finished media with clients, friends, and family also is a common requirement.
Thank You for Your Comments and Suggestions
As a cloud backup and storage provider, your contributions were of great interest to us. A number of readers made suggestions for how we can improve or augment our services to increase the options for digital media management. We listened and are considering your comments. They will be included in our discussions and planning for possible future services and offerings from Backblaze. We thank everyone for your contributions.
Digital media management
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going!
Were you surprised by any of the responses? Do you have something further to contribute? This is by no means the end of our exploration of how to better serve media professionals, so let’s keep the lines of communication open.
If you have spent any time, as we have, talking to photographers and videographers about how they back up and archive their digital photos and videos, then you know that there’s no one answer or solution that users have discovered to meet their needs.
Based on what we’ve heard, visual media artists are still searching for the best combination of software, hardware, and cloud storage to preserve their media, and to be able to search, retrieve, and reuse that media as easily as possible.
Yes, there are a number of solutions out there, and some users have created combinations of hardware, software, and services to meet their needs, but we have met few who claim to be satisfied with their solution for digital asset management (DAM), or expect that they will be using the same solution in just a year or two.
We’d like to open a dialog with professionals and serious amateurs to learn more about what you’re doing, what you’d like to do, and how Backblaze might fit into that solution.
Tell Us Both Your Current Solution and Your Dream Solution
To get started, we’d love to hear from you about how you’re managing your photos and videos. Whether you’re an amateur or a professional, your experiences are valuable and will help us understand how to provide the best cloud component of a digital asset management solution.
Here are some questions to consider:
Are you using direct-attached drives, NAS (Network-Attached Storage), or offline storage for your media?
Do you use the cloud for media you’re actively working on?
Do you back up or archive to the cloud?
Did you have a catalog or record of the media that you’ve archived that you use to search and retrieve media?
What’s different about how you work in the field (or traveling) versus how you work in a studio (or at home)?
What software and/or hardware currently works for you?
What’s the biggest impediment to working in the way you’d really like to?
How could the cloud work better for you?
Please Contribute Your Ideas
To contribute, please answer the following two questions in the comments below or send an email to [email protected]. Please comment or email your response by December 22, 2017.
How are you currently backing up your digital photos, video files, and/or file libraries/catalogs? Do you have a backup system that uses attached drives, a local network, the cloud, or offline storage media? Does it work well for you?
Imagine your ideal digital asset backup setup. What would it look like? Don’t be constrained by current products, technologies, brands, or solutions. Invent a technology or product if you wish. Describe an ideal system that would work the way you want it to.
We know you have opinions about managing photos and videos. Bring them on!
We’re soliciting answers far and wide from amateurs and experts, weekend video makers and well-known professional photographers. We have a few amateur and professional photographers and videographers here at Backblaze, and they are contributing their comments, as well.
Once we have gathered all the responses, we’ll write a post on what we learned about how people are currently working and what they would do if anything were possible. Look for that post after the beginning of the year.
Don’t Miss Future Posts on Media Management
We don’t want you to miss our future posts on photography, videography, and digital asset management. To receive email notices of blog updates (and no spam, we promise), enter your email address above using the Join button at the top of the page.
Come Back on Thursday for our Photography Post (and a Special Giveaway, too)
This coming Thursday we’ll have a blog post about the different ways that photographers and videographers are currently managing their digital media assets.
Plus, you’ll have the chance to win a valuable hardware/software combination for digital media management that I am sure you will appreciate. (You’ll have to wait until Thursday to find out what the prize is, but it has a total value of over $700.)
Past Posts on Photography, Videography, and Digital Asset Management
We’ve written a number of blog posts about photos, videos, and managing digital assets. We’ve posted links to some of them below.
When I heard we were merging with CoderDojo, I was delighted. CoderDojo is a wonderful organisation with a spectacular community, and it’s going to be great to join forces with the team and work towards our common goal: making a difference to the lives of young people by making technology accessible to them.
You may remember that last year Philip and I went along to Coolest Projects, CoderDojo’s annual event at which their global community showcase their best makes. It was awesome! This year a whole bunch of us from the Raspberry Pi Foundation attended Coolest Projects with our new Irish colleagues, and as expected, the projects on show were as cool as can be.
This year’s coolest projects!
Young maker Benjamin demoed his brilliant RGB LED table tennis ball display for us, and showed off his brilliant project tutorial website codemakerbuddy.com, which he built with Python and Flask. [Click on any of the images to enlarge them.]
Next up, Aimee showed us a recipes app she’d made with the MIT App Inventor. It was a really impressive and well thought-out project.
This very successful OpenCV face detection program with hardware installed in a teddy bear was great as well:
Helen’s and Oly’s favourite project involved…live bees!
BEEEEEEEEEEES!
Its creator, 12-year-old Amy, said she wanted to do something to help the Earth. Her project uses various sensors to record data on the bee population in the hive. An adjacent monitor displays the data in a web interface:
Coolest robots
I enjoyed seeing lots of GPIO Zero projects out in the wild, including this robotic lawnmower made by Kevin and Zach:
Kevin and Zach’s Raspberry Pi lawnmower project with Python and GPIO Zero, showed at CoderDojo Coolest Projects 2017
Philip’s favourite make was a Pi-powered robot you can control with your mind! According to the maker, Laura, it worked really well with Philip because he has no hair.
This is extraordinary. Laura from @CoderDojo Romania has programmed a mind controlled robot using @Raspberry_Pi @coolestprojects
And here are some pictures of even more cool robots we saw:
Games, toys, activities
Oly and I were massively impressed with the work of Mogamad, Daniel, and Basheerah, who programmed a (borrowed) Amazon Echo to make a voice-controlled text-adventure game using Java and the Alexa API. They’ve inspired me to try something similar using the AIY projects kit and adventurelib!
Christopher Hill did a brilliant job with his Home Alone LEGO house. He used sensors to trigger lights and sounds to make it look like someone’s at home, like in the film. I should have taken a video – seeing it in action was great!
We really enjoyed seeing so many young people collaborating, experimenting, and taking full advantage of the opportunity to make real projects. And we loved how huge the range of technologies in use was: people employed all manner of hardware and software to bring their ideas to life.
Wow! Look at that room full of awesome young people. @coolestprojects #coolestprojects @CoderDojo
Congratulations to the Coolest Projects 2017 prize winners, and to all participants. Here are some of the teams that won in the different categories:
Take a look at the gallery of all winners over on Flickr.
The wow factor
Raspberry Pi co-founder and Foundation trustee Pete Lomas came along to the event as well. Here’s what he had to say:
It’s hard to describe the scale of the event, and photos just don’t do it justice. The first thing that hit me was the sheer excitement of the CoderDojo ninjas [the children attending Dojos]. Everyone was setting up for their time with the project judges, and their pure delight at being able to show off their creations was evident in both halls. Time and time again I saw the ninjas apply their creativity to help save the planet or make someone’s life better, and it’s truly exciting that we are going to help that continue and expand.
Even after 8 hours, enthusiasm wasn’t flagging – the awards ceremony was just brilliant, with ninjas high-fiving the winners on the way to the stage. This speaks volumes about the ethos and vision of the CoderDojo founders, where everyone is a winner just by being part of a community of worldwide friends. It was a brilliant introduction, and if this weekend was anything to go by, our merger certainly is a marriage made in Heaven.
Join this awesome community!
If all this inspires you as much as it did us, consider looking for a CoderDojo near you – and sign up as a volunteer! There’s plenty of time for young people to build up skills and start working on a project for next year’s event. Check out coolestprojects.com for more information.
April showers bring May startups! This month we have three hot startups for you to check out. Keep reading to find out what they’re up to, and how they’re using AWS to do it.
Today’s post features the following startups:
Lobster – an AI-powered platform connecting creative social media users to professionals.
Visii – helping consumers find the perfect product using visual search.
Tiqets – a curated marketplace for culture and entertainment.
Lobster (London, England)
Every day, social media users generate billions of authentic images and videos to rival typical stock photography. Powered by Artificial Intelligence, Lobster enables brands, agencies, and the press to license visual content directly from social media users so they can find that piece of content that perfectly fits their brand or story. Lobster does the work of sorting through major social networks (Instagram, Flickr, Facebook, Vk, YouTube, and Vimeo) and cloud storage providers (Dropbox, Google Photos, and Verizon) to find media, saving brands and agencies time and energy. Using filters like gender, color, age, and geolocation can help customers find the unique content they’re looking for, while Lobster’s AI and visual recognition finds images instantly. Lobster also runs photo challenges to help customers discover the perfect image to fit their needs.
Lobster is an excellent platform for creative people to get their work discovered while also protecting their content. Users are treated as copyright holders and earn 75% of the final price of every sale. The platform is easy to use: new users simply sign in with an existing social media or cloud account and can start showcasing their artistic talent right away. Lobster allows users to connect to any number of photo storage sources so they’re able to choose which items to share and which to keep private. Once users have selected their favorite photos and videos to share, they can sit back and watch as their work is picked to become the signature for a new campaign or featured on a cool website – and start earning money for their work.
Lobster is using a variety of AWS services to keep everything running smoothly. The company uses Amazon S3 to store photography that was previously ordered by customers. When a customer purchases content, the respective piece of content must be available at any given moment, independent from the original source. Lobster is also using Amazon EC2 for its application servers and Elastic Load Balancing to monitor the state of each server.
In today’s vast web, a growing number of products are being sold online and searching for something specific can be difficult. Visii was created to cater to businesses and help them extract value from an asset they already have – their images. Their SaaS platform allows clients to leverage an intelligent visual search on their websites and apps to help consumers find the perfect product for them. With Visii, consumers can choose an image and immediately discover more based on their tastes and preferences. Whether it’s clothing, artwork, or home decor, Visii will make recommendations to get consumers to search visually and subsequently help businesses increase their conversion rates.
There are multiple ways for businesses to integrate Visii on their website or app. Many of Visii’s clients choose to build against their API, but Visii also work closely with many clients to figure out the most effective way to do this for each unique case. This has led Visii to help build innovative user interfaces and figure out the best integration points to get consumers to search visually. Businesses can also integrate Visii on their website with a widget – they just need to provide a list of links to their products and Visii does the rest.
Visii runs their entire infrastructure on AWS. Their APIs and pipeline all sit in auto-scaling groups, with ELBs in front of them, sending things across into Amazon Simple Queue Service and Amazon Aurora. Recently, Visii moved from Amazon RDS to Aurora and noted that the process was incredibly quick and easy. Because they make heavy use of machine learning, it is crucial that their pipeline only runs when required and that they maximize the efficiency of their uptime.
Tiqets is making the ticket-buying experience faster and easier for travelers around the world. Founded in 2013, Tiqets is one of the leading curated marketplaces for admission tickets to museums, zoos, and attractions. Their mission is to help travelers get the most out of their trips by helping them find and experience a city’s culture and entertainment. Tiqets partners directly with vendors to adapt to a customer’s specific needs, and is now active in over 30 cities in the US, Europe, and the Middle East.
With Tiqets, travelers can book tickets either ahead of time or at their destination for a wide range of attractions. The Tiqets app provides real-time availability and delivers tickets straight to customer’s phones via email, direct download, or in the app. Customers save time skipping long lines (a perk of the app!), save trees (don’t need to physically print tickets), and most importantly, they can make the most out of their leisure time. For each attraction featured on Tiqets, there is a lot of helpful information including best modes of transportation, hours, commonly asked questions, and reviews from other customers.
The Tiqets platform consists of the consumer-facing website, the internal and external-facing APIs, and the partner self-service portals. For the app hosting and infrastructure, Tiqets uses AWS services such as Elastic Load Balancing, Amazon EC2, Amazon RDS, Amazon CloudFront, Amazon Route 53, and Amazon ElastiCache. Through the infrastructure orchestration of their AWS configuration, they can easily set up separate development or test environments while staying close to the production environment as well.
Tiqets is hiring! Be sure to check out their jobs page if you are interested in joining the Tiqets team.
—
Thanks for reading and don’t forget to check out April’s Hot Startups if you missed it.
Backblaze will be celebrating its ten year anniversary this month. As I was reflecting on our path to get here, I thought some of the issues we encountered along the way are universal to most startups. With that in mind, I’ll write a series of blog posts focused on the entrepreneurial journey. This post is the first and focuses on the birth of Backblaze. I hope you stick around and enjoy the Backblaze story along the way.
What’s Your Problem?
The entrepreneur builds things to solve problems – your own or someone else’s. That problem may be a lack of something that you wish existed or something broken you want to fix. Here’s the problem that kicked off Backblaze and how it got noticed:
Brian Wilson, now co-founder and CTO of Backblaze, had been doing tech support for friends and family, as many of us did. One day he got a panicked call from one of those friends, Lise.
Lise: “You’ve got to help me! My computer crashed!” Brian: “No problem – we’ll get you a new laptop; where’s your backup?” Lise: “Look, what I don’t need now is a lecture! What I need is for you to get my data back!”
Brian was religious about backing up data and had been for years. He burned his data onto a CD and a DVD, diversifying the media types he used. During the process, Brian periodically read some files from each of the discs to test his backups. Finally, Brian put one disc in his closet and mailed another to his brother in New Mexico to have it offsite. Brian did this every week!
Brian was obviously a lot more obsessive than most of us.
Lise, however, had the opposite problem. She had no backup. And she wasn’t alone.
Whose Problem Is It?
A serious pain-point for one person may turn out to be a serious pain-point for millions.
At this point, it would have been easy just to say, “Well that sucks” or blame Lise. “User error” and “they just don’t get it” are common refrains in tech. But blaming the user doesn’t solve the problem.
Brian started talking to people and asking, “Who doesn’t back up?” He also talked with me and some of the others that are now Backblaze co-founders, and we asked the same question to others.
It turned out that most people didn’t back up their computers. Lise wasn’t the anomaly; Brian was. And that was a problem.
Over the previous decade, everything had gone digital. Photos, movies, financials, taxes, everything. A single crashed hard drive could cause you to lose everything. And drives would indeed crash. Over time everything would be digital, and society as a whole would permanently lose vast amounts of information. Big problem.
Surveying the Landscape
There’s a well-known adage that “Having no competition may mean you have no market.” The corollary I’d add is that “Having competition doesn’t mean the market is full.”
Weren’t There Backup Solutions?
Yes. Plenty. In fact, we joked that we were thirty years too late to the problem.
“Solutions Exist” does not mean “Problem Solved.” Even though many backup solutions were available, most people did not back up their data.
What Were the Current Solutions?
At first glance, it seems clear we’d be competing with other backup services. But when I asked people “How do you back up your data today?”, here were the answers I heard most frequently:
Copy ‘My Documents’ directory to an external drive before going on vacation
Copy files to a USB key
Send important files to Gmail
Pray
And “Do I need to back up?” (I’ll talk about this one in another post.)
Sometimes people would mention a particular backup app or service, but this was rare.
What Was Wrong With the Current Solutions?
Existing backup systems had various issues. They would not back up all of the users’ data, for example. They would only back up periodically and thus didn’t have current data. Most solutions were not off-site, so fire, theft or another catastrophe could still wipe out data. Some weren’t automatic, which left more room for neglect and user error.
“Solutions Exist” does not mean “Problem Solved.”
In fairness, some backup products and services had already solved some of these issues. But few people used those products. I talked with a lot of people and asked, “Why don’t you use some backup software/service?”
The most common answer was, “I tried it…and it was too hard and too expensive.” We’d learn a lot more about what “hard” and “expensive” meant along the way.
Finding and Testing Solutions
Focus is critical for execution, but when brainstorming solutions, go broad.
We considered a variety of approaches to help people back up their files.
Peer-to-Peer Backup: This was the original idea. Two people would install our backup software which would send each person’s data to the other’s computer. This idea had a lot going for it: The data would be off-site; It would work with existing hardware; It was mildly viral.
Local Drive Backup: The backup software would send data to a USB hard drive. Manually copying files to an external drive was most people’s idea of backing up. However, no good software existed at the time to make this easy. (Time Machine for the Mac hadn’t launched yet.)
Backup To Online Services: Weirder and more unique, this idea stemmed from noticing that online services provided free storage: Flickr for photos; Google Docs for documents and spreadsheets; YouTube for movies; and so on. We considered writing software that would back up each file type to the service that supported it and back up the rest to Gmail.
Backup To Our Online Storage: We’d create a service that backed up data to the cloud. It may seem obvious now, but backing up to the cloud was just one of a variety of possibilities at the time. Also, initially, we didn’t mean ‘our’ storage. We assumed we would use S3 or some other storage provider.
The goal was to come up with a solution that was easy.
We put each solution we came up with through its paces. The goal was to come up with a solution that was easy: Easy for people to use. Easy to understand.
Peer-to-peer backup? First, we’d have to explain what it is (no small task) and then get buy-in from the user to host a backup on their machine. That meant having enough space on each computer, and both needed to be online at the same time. After our initial excitement with the idea, we came to the conclusion that there were too many opportunities for things to go wrong. Verdict: Not easy.
Backup software? Not off-site, and required the purchase of a hard drive. If the drive broke or wasn’t connected, no backup occurred. A useful solution but again, too many opportunities for things to go wrong. Verdict: Not easy.
Back up to online services? Users needed accounts at each, and none of the services supported all file types, so your data ended up scattered all over the place. Verdict: Not easy.
Back up to our online storage? The backup would be current, kept off-site, and updated automatically. It was easy to for people to use, and easy to understand. Verdict: Easy!
Getting To the Solution
Don’t brainstorm forever. Problems don’t get solved on ideas alone.
We decided to back up to our online storage! It met many of the key goals. We started building.
Attempt #1
We built a backup software installer, a way to pick files and folders to back up, and the underlying engine that copies the files to remote storage. We tried to make it comfortable by minimizing clicks and questions.
Fail #1
This approach seemed easy enough to use, at least for us, but it turned out not to be for our target users.
We thought about the original answer we heard: “I tried it…and it was too hard and too expensive.”
“Too hard” is not enough information. What was too hard before? Were the icons too small? The text too long? A critical feature missing? Were there too many features to wade through? Or something else altogether?
Dig deeper into users’ actual needs
We reached out to a lot of friends, family, and co-workers and held some low-key pizza and beer focus groups. Those folks walked us through their backup experience. While there were a lot of difficult areas, the most complicated part was setting up what would be backed up.
“I had to get all the files and folders on my computer organized; then I could set up the backup.”
That’s like cleaning the garage. Sounds like a good idea, but life conspires to get in the way, and it doesn’t happen.
We had to solve that or users would never think of our service as ‘easy.’
Takeaway: Dig deeper into users’ actual needs.
Attempt #2
Trying to remove the need to “clean the garage,” we asked folks what they wanted to be backed up. They told us they wanted their photos, movies, music, documents, and everything important.
We listened and tried making it easier. We focused our second attempt at a backup solution by pre-selecting everything ‘important.’ We selected the documents folder and then went one step further by finding all the photo, movies, music, and other common file types on the computer. Now users didn’t have to select files and folders – we would do it for them!
Fail #2
More pizza and beer user testing had people ask, “But how do I know that my photos are being backed up?”
We told them, “we’re searching your whole computer for photos.”
“But my photos are in this weird format: .jpg, are those included? .gif? .psd?”
We learned that the backup process felt nebulous to users since they wouldn’t know what exactly would be selected. Users would always feel uncomfortable – and uncomfortable isn’t ‘easy.’
Takeaway: No, really, keep digging deeper into users’ actual needs. Identify their real problem, not the solution they propose.
Attempt #3
We took a step back and asked, “What do we know?”
We want all of our “important” files backed up, but it can be hard for us to identify what files those are. Having us guess makes us uncomfortable. So, forget the tech. What experience would be the right one?
Our answer was that the computer would just magically be backed up to the cloud.
Then one of our co-founders Tim wondered, “what if we didn’t ask any questions and just backed up everything?”
At first, we all looked at him askew. Backup everything? That was a lot of data. How would that be possible? But we came back to, “Is this the right answer? Yes. So let’s see if we can make it work.”
So we flipped the entire backup approach on its head.
We didn’t ask users, “What do you want to have backed up.” We asked, “What do you NOT want to be backed up?” If you didn’t know, we’d back up all your data. It took away the scary “pick your files” question and made people comfortable that all their necessary data was being backed up.
We ran that experience by users, and their surprised response was, “Really, that’s it?” Hallelujah.
Success.
Takeaway: Keep digging deeper. Don’t let the tech get in the way of understanding the real problem.
Pricing
Pricing isn’t a side-note – it’s part of the product. Understand how customers will perceive your pricing.
We had developed a solution that was easy to use and easy to understand. But could we make it easy to afford? How much do we charge?
We would be storing a lot of data for each customer. The more data they needed to store, the more it would cost us. We planned to put the data on S3, which charged $0.15/GB/month. So it would seem logical to follow that same pricing model.
People thought of the value of the service rather than an amount of storage.
People had no idea how much data they had on their hard drive and certainly not how much of it needed to be backed up. Worse, they could be off by 1000x if they weren’t sure about the difference between megabytes and gigabytes, as some were.
We had to solve that too, or users would never think of our service as ‘easy.’
I asked everyone I could find: “If we were to provide you a service that automatically would backup all of the data on your computer over the internet, what would that be worth to you?”
What I heard back was a bell-curve:
A small number of people said, “$0. It should be free. Everything on the net is free!”
A small number of people said, “$50 – $100/month. That’s incredibly valuable!”
But by far the majority said, “Hmm. If it were $5/month, that’d be a no-brainer.”
A few interesting takeaways:
Everyone assumed it would be a monthly charge even though I didn’t ask, “What would you pay per month.”
No one said, “I’d pay $x/GB/month,” so people thought of the value of the service rather than an amount of storage.
There may have been opportunities to offer a free service and attempt to monetize it in other ways or to charge $50 – $100/month/user, but these were the small markets.
At $5/month, there was a significant slice of the population that was excited to use it.
Conclusion On the Solution
Over and over again we heard, “I tried backing up, but it was too hard and too expensive.”
After really understanding what was complicated, we finally got our real solution: An unlimited online backup service that would back up all your data automatically and charge just $5/month.
Easy to use, easy to understand, and easy to afford. Easy in the ways that mattered to the people using the service.
Often looking backward things seem obvious. But we learned a lot along the way:
Having competition doesn’t mean the market is full. Just because solutions exist doesn’t mean the problem is solved.
Don’t brainstorm forever. Problems don’t get solved on ideas alone. Brainstorm options, but don’t get stuck in the brainstorming phase.
Dig deeper into users’ actual needs. Then keep digging. Don’t let your knowledge of tech get in the way of your understanding the user. And be willing to shift course as your learn more.
Pricing isn’t a side-note. It’s part of the product. Understand how customers will perceive your pricing.
Just because we knew the right solution didn’t mean that it was possible. I’ll talk about that, along with how to launch, getting early traction, and more in future posts. What other questions do you have? Leave them in the comments.
UPDATE May 17, 2018: On April 20, Flickr announced that is being acquired by the image hosting and sharing service SmugMug. At that time, Flickr users were told that they have until May 25, 2018, to either accept the new terms of service from SmugMug or download their photo files from Flickr and close their accounts. Here is an excerpt from the email that was sent to Flickr users:
We think you are going to love Flickr under SmugMug ownership, but you can choose to not have your Flickr account and data transferred to SmugMug until May 25, 2018. If you want to keep your Flickr account and data from being transferred, you must go to your Flickr account to download the photos and videos you want to keep, then delete your account from your Account Settings by May 25, 2018.
If you do not delete your account by May 25, 2018, your Flickr account and data will transfer to SmugMug and will be governed by SmugMug’s Terms and Privacy Policy.
We wanted to let our readers know of this change, and also help them download their photos if they wish to do so. To that end, we’ve updated a post we published a little over a year ago with instructions on how to download your photos from Flickr. It’s a good idea to have a backup of your photos on Flickr whether or not you plan to continue with the service.
You can read Peter’s updated post from March 21, 2017, How to Back Up Your Flickr Library, below.
— Editor
Flickr is a popular photo blogging service used by pro and amateur photographers alike. Flickr helps you archive your photos in the cloud and share them publicly with others. What happens when Flickr is the only place you can find your photos, though?
I hadn’t thought that much of that contingency. I’ve been a Flickr user since the pre-Yahoo days — 2004. I recently took stock of all the photos I’d uploaded to Flickr and realized something unsettling: I didn’t have some of these images on my Mac. It’s been 13 years and probably half a dozen computers since then, so I wasn’t surprised that some photos had fallen through the cracks.
I decided to be better safe than sorry. I set out to backup my entire Flickr library to make sure I had everything. And I’m here to pass along what I learned.
Flickr’s Camera Roll and Album Download Options
Most of Flickr’s workflow — and most of their supported apps — focus on getting images into Flickr, not out of Flickr. That doesn’t mean you can’t download images from Flickr, but it isn’t straightforward.
You can download photos directly from Flickr using their Camera Roll view, which organizes all your photos by the date they were taken. This is Flickr’s file-management interface, letting you select photos for whichever use you wish. Once you’ve selected the photos you want using the check boxes, Flickr will create a ZIP file that you can download. You are limited to 500 photos at a time, so this could take a number of repetitions if you have a lot of photos.
The download UI once you’ve met your photo selections:
You also can download Flickr Albums. Like the limit for the camera roll, you are limited to the number of photos you can download. In the case of albums, the limit is 5,000 files from albums at a time.
Some third-party app makers have tapped into Flickr’s API to create various import and export services and apps.
Bulkr is one such app. The app, free to download, lets you download images from your Flickr library with the touch of a button. It’s dependent on Adobe Flash and requires Adobe AIR. Some features are unavailable unless you pay for the “Pro” version ($29).
Flickr downloadr is another free app that lets you download your Flickr library. It also works on Mac, Windows and Linux systems. No license encumbrances to download extra content — it’s released as open source.
I’ve tried them both on my library of over 8,000 images. In either case, I just set up the apps and let them run — they took a while, a couple of hours to grab everything. So if you’re working with a large archive of Flickr images, I’d recommend setting aside some time when you can leave your computer running.
What To Do With Your Flickr Images
You’ve downloaded the images to your local hard drive. What next? Catalog what you have. Both Macs and PCs include such software. The apps for each platform are both called “Photos.” They have the benefit of being free, built-in, and well-supported using existing tools and workflows.
If the Photos apps included with your computer don’t suit you, there are other commercial app options. Adobe Photoshop Lightroom is one of the more popular options that work with both Macs and Windows PCs. It’s included with Adobe’s $9.99 per month Creative Cloud Photography subscription (bundled with Photoshop), or you can buy it separately for $149.
Archive Your Backup
Now that you’ve downloaded all of your Flickr images, make sure they’re safe by backing them up. Back them up locally using Time Machine (on the Mac), Windows Backup or whatever means you prefer.
Even though you’ve gotten the images from the cloud by downloading them from Flickr, it’d be a good idea to store a backup copy offsite just in case. That’s keeping with the guidelines of the 3-2-1 Backup Strategy — a solid way to make sure that nothing bad can happen to your data.
Backblaze Backup and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage are both great options, of course, for backing up and archiving your media, but the main thing is to make sure your photos are safe and sound. If anything happens to your computer or your local backup, you’ll still have a copy of those precious memories stored securely.
Need more tips on how to back up your computer? Check out our Computer Backup Guide for more details.
Today, Yahoo Mail introduced a feature that allows you to automatically sync your mobile photos to Yahoo Mail so that they’re readily available when you’re composing an email from your computer. A key technology behind this feature is a new photo and video platform called “Tripod,” which was born out of the innovations and capabilities of Flickr.
For 13 years, Flickr has served as one of the world’s largest photo-sharing communities and as a platform for millions of people who have collectively uploaded more than 13 billion photos globally. Tripod provides a great opportunity to bring some of the most-loved and useful Flickr features to the Yahoo network of products, including Yahoo Mail, Yahoo Messenger, and Yahoo Answers Now.
Tripod and its Three Services
As the name suggests, Tripod offers three services:
The Pixel Service: for uploading, storing, resizing, editing, and serving photos and videos.
The Enrichment Service: for enriching media metadata using image recognition algorithms. For example, the algorithms might identify and tag scenes, actions, and objects.
The Aggregation Service: for in-application and cross-application metadata aggregation, filtering, and search.
The combination of these three services makes Tripod an end-to-end platform for smart image services. There is also an administrative console for configuring the integration of an application with Tripod, and an identity service for authentication and authorization.
Figure 1: Tripod Architecture
The Pixel Service
Flickr has achieved a highly-scalable photo upload and resizing pipeline. Particularly in the case of large-scale ingestion of thousands of photos and videos, Flickr’s mobile and API teams tuned techniques, like resumable upload and deduplication, to create a high-quality photo-sync experience. On serving, Flickr tackled the challenge of optimizing storage without impacting photo quality, and added dynamic resizing to support more diverse client photo layouts.
Over many years at Flickr, we’ve demonstrated sustained uploads of more than 500 photos per second. The full pipeline includes the PHP Upload API endpoint, backend Java services (Image Daemon, Storage Master), hot-hot uploads across the US West and East Coasts, and five worldwide photo caches, plus a massive CDN.
In Tripod’s Pixel Service, we leverage all of this core technology infrastructure as-is, except for the API endpoint, which is now written in Java and implements a new bucket-based data model.
The Enrichment Service
In 2013, Flickr made an exciting leap. Yahoo acquired two Computer Vision technology companies, IQ Engines and LookFlow, and rolled these incredible teams into Flickr. Using their image recognition algorithms, we enhanced Flickr Search and introduced Magic View to the Flickr Camera Roll.
In Tripod, the Enrichment Service applies the image recognition technology to each photograph, resulting in rich metadata that can be used to enhance filtering, indexing, and searching. The Enrichment Service can identify places, themes, landmarks, objects, colors, text, media similarity, NSFW content, and best thumbnail. It also performs OCR text recognition and applies an aesthetic score to indicate the overall quality of the photograph.
The Aggregation Service
The Aggregation Service lets an application, such as Yahoo Mail, find media based on any criteria. For example, it can return all the photos belonging to a particular person within a particular application, all public photos, or all photos belonging to a particular person taken in a specific location during a specific time period (e.g. San Francisco between March 1, 2015 and May 31, 2015.)
Vespa, Yahoo’s internal search engine, indexes all metadata for each media item. If the Enrichment Service has been run on the media, the metadata is indexed in Vespa and is available to the Aggregation API. The result set from a call to the Aggregation Service depends on authentication and the read permissions defined by an API key.
APIs and SDKs
Each service is expressed as a set of APIs. We upgraded our API technology stack, switching from PHP to Spring MVC on a Java Jetty servlet container, and made use of the latest Spring features such as Spring Data, Spring Boot, and Spring Security with OAuth 2.0. Tripod’s API is defined and documented using Swagger. Each service is developed and deployed semi-autonomously from a separate Git repository with a separate build lifecycle to an independent micro-service container.
Figure 2: Tripod API
Swagger Editor makes it easy to auto-generate SDKs in many languages, depending on the needs of Yahoo product developers. The mobile SDKs for iOS and Android are most commonly used, as is the JS SDK for Yahoo’s web developers. The SDKs make integration with Tripod by a web or mobile application easy. For example, in the case of the Yahoo Mail photo upload feature, the Yahoo Mail mobile app includes the embedded Tripod SDK to manage the photo upload process.
Buckets and API Keys
The Tripod data model differs in some important ways from the Flickr data model. Tripod applications, buckets, and API keys introduce the notion of multi-tenancy, with a strong access control boundary. An application is simply the name of the application that is using Tripod (e.g. Yahoo Mail). Buckets are logical containers for the application’s media, and media in an application is further affected by bucket settings such as compression rate, capacity, media time-to-live, and the selection of enrichments to compute.
Figure 3: Creating a new Bucket
Beyond Tripod’s generic attributes, a bucket may also have custom organizing attributes that are defined by an application’s developers. API keys control read/write permissions on buckets and are used to generate OAuth tokens for anonymous or user-authenticated access to a bucket.
Figure 4: Creating a new API Key
App developers at Yahoo use the Tripod Console to:
Create the buckets and API keys that they will use with their application
Define the bucket settings and the access control rules for each API key
Another departure from the Flickr API is that Tripod can handle media that is not user-generated content (UGC). This is critical for storing curated content, as is required by many Yahoo applications.
Architecture and Implementation
Going from a monolithic architecture to a microservices architecture has had its challenges. In particular, we’ve had to find the right internal communication process between the services. At the core of this is our Pulsar Event Bus, over which we send Avro messages backed by a strong schema registry. This lets each Tripod team move fast, without introducing incompatible changes that would break another Tripod service.
For data persistence, we’ve moved most of our high-scale multi-colo data to Yahoo’s distributed noSQL database. We’ve been experimenting with using Redis Cluster as our caching tier, and we use Vespa to drive the Aggregation service. For Enrichment, we make extensive use of Storm and HBase for real-time processing of Tripod’s Computer Vision algorithms. Finally, we run large backfills using PIG, Oozie, and Hive on Yahoo’s massive grid infrastructure.
In 2017, we expect Tripod will be at 50% of Flickr’s scale, with Tripod supporting the photo and video needs across many Yahoo applications that serve Yahoo’s 1B users across mobile and desktop.
After reading about Tripod, you might have a few questions
Did Tripod replace Flickr?!
No! Flickr is still here, better than ever. In fact, Flickr celebrated its 13th birthday last week! Over the past several years, the Flickr team has implemented significant innovations on core photo management features (such as an optimized storage footprint, dynamic resizing, Camera Roll, Magic View, and Search). We wanted to make these technology advancements available to other teams at Yahoo!
But, what about the Flickr API? Why not just use that?
Flickr APIs are being used by hundreds of thousands of third-party developers around the world. Flickr’s API was designed for interacting with Flickr Accounts, Photos, and Groups, generally on lower scale than the Flickr site itself; it was not designed for independent, highly configurable, multi-tenant core photo management at large scale.
How can I join the team?
We’re hiring and we’d love to talk to you about our open opportunities! Just email [email protected] to start the conversation.
Virtual reality (VR) 360° videos are the next frontier of how we engage with and consume content. Unlike a traditional scenario in which a person views a screen in front of them, VR places the user inside an immersive experience. A viewer is “in” the story, and not on the sidelines as an observer.
Ivan Sutherland, widely regarded as the father of computer graphics, laid out the vision for virtual reality in his famous speech, “Ultimate Display” in 1965 [1]. In that he said, “You shouldn’t think of a computer screen as a way to display information, but rather as a window into a virtual world that could eventually look real, sound real, move real, interact real, and feel real.”
Over the years, significant advancements have been made to bring reality closer to that vision. With the advent of headgear capable of rendering 3D spatial audio and video, realistic sound and visuals can be virtually reproduced, delivering immersive experiences to consumers.
When it comes to entertainment and sports, streaming in VR has become the new 4K HEVC/UHD of 2016. This has been accelerated by the release of new camera capture hardware like GoPro and streaming capabilities such as 360° video streaming from Facebook and YouTube. Yahoo streams lots of engaging sports, finance, news, and entertainment video content to tens of millions of users. The opportunity to produce and stream such content in 360° VR opens a unique opportunity to Yahoo to offer new types of engagement, and bring the users a sense of depth and visceral presence.
While this is not an experience that is live in product, it is an area we are actively exploring. In this blog post, we take a look at what’s involved in building an end-to-end VR streaming workflow for both Live and Video on Demand (VOD). Our experiments and research goes from camera rig setup, to video stitching, to encoding, to the eventual rendering of videos on video players on desktop and VR headsets. We also discuss challenges yet to be solved and the opportunities they present in streaming VR.
1. The Workflow
Yahoo’s video platform has a workflow that is used internally to enable streaming to an audience of tens of millions with the click of a few buttons. During experimentation, we enhanced this same proven platform and set of APIs to build a complete 360°/VR experience. The diagram below shows the end-to-end workflow for streaming 360°/VR that we built on Yahoo’s video platform.
Figure 1: VR Streaming Workflow at Yahoo
1.1. Capturing 360° video
In order to capture a virtual reality video, you need access to a 360°-capable video camera. Such a camera uses either fish-eye lenses or has an array of wide-angle lenses to collectively cover a 360 (θ) by 180 (ϕ) sphere as shown below.
Though it sounds simple, there is a real challenge in capturing a scene in 3D 360° as most of the 360° video cameras offer only 2D 360° video capture.
In initial experiments, we tried capturing 3D video using two cameras side-by-side, for left and right eyes and arranging them in a spherical shape. However this required too many cameras – instead we use view interpolation in the stitching step to create virtual cameras.
Another important consideration with 360° video is the number of axes the camera is capturing video with. In traditional 360° video that is captured using only a single-axis (what we refer as horizontal video), a user can turn their head from left to right. But this setup of cameras does not support a user tilting their head at 90°.
To achieve true 3D in our setup, we went with 6-12 GoPro cameras having 120° field of view (FOV) arranged in a ring, and an additional camera each on top and bottom, with each one outputting 2.7K at 30 FPS.
1.2. Stitching 360° video
Projection Layouts
Because a 360° view is a spherical video, the surface of this sphere needs to be projected onto a planar surface in 2D so that video encoders can process it. There are two popular layouts:
Equirectangular layout: This is the most widely-used format in computer graphics to represent spherical surfaces in a rectangular form with an aspect ratio of 2:1. This format has redundant information at the poles which means some pixels are over-represented, introducing distortions at the poles compared to the equator (as can be seen in the equirectangular mapping of the sphere below).
Figure 2: Equirectangular Layout [2]
CubeMap layout: CubeMap layout is a format that has also been used in computer graphics. It contains six individual 2D textures that map to six sides of a cube. The figure below is a typical cubemap representation. In a cubemap layout, the sphere is projected onto six faces and the images are folded out into a 2D image, so pieces of a video frame map to different parts of a cube, which leads to extremely efficient compact packing. Cubemap layouts require about 25% fewer pixels compared to equirectangular layouts.
Figure 3: CubeMap Layout [3]
Stitching Videos
In our setup, we experimented with a couple of stitching softwares. One was from Vahana VR [4], and the other was a modified version of the open-source Surround360 technology that works with a GoPro rig [5]. Both softwares output equirectangular panoramas for the left and the right eye. Here are the steps involved in stitching together a 360° image:
Raw frame image processing: Converts uncompressed raw video data to RGB, which involves several steps starting from black-level adjustment, to applying Demosaic algorithms in order to figure out RGB color parts for each pixel based on the surrounding pixels. This also involves gamma correction, color correction, and anti vignetting (undoing the reduction in brightness on the image periphery). Finally, this stage applies sharpening and noise-reduction algorithms to enhance the image and suppress the noise.
Calibration: During the calibration step, stitching software takes steps to avoid vertical parallax while stitching overlapping portions in adjacent cameras in the rig. The purpose is to align everything in the scene, so that both eyes see every point at the same vertical coordinate. This step essentially matches the key points in images among adjacent camera pairs. It uses computer vision algorithms for feature detection like Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK) [6] and AKAZE [7].
Optical Flow: During stitching, to cover the gaps between adjacent real cameras and provide interpolated view, optical flow is used to create virtual cameras. The optical flow algorithm finds the pattern of apparent motion of image objects between two consecutive frames caused by the movement of the object or camera. It uses OpenCV algorithms to find the optical flow [8].
Below are the frames produced by the GoPro camera rig:
Figure 4: Individual frames from 12-camera rig
Figure 5: Stitched frame output with PtGui
Figure 6: Stitched frame with barrel distortion using Surround360
Figure 7: Stitched frame after removing barrel distortion using Surround360
To get the full depth in stereo, the rig is set-up so that i = r * sin(FOV/2 – 360/n). where:
i = IPD/2 where IPD is the inter-pupillary distance between eyes.\
r = Radius of the rig.
FOV = Field of view of GoPro cameras, 120 degrees.
n = Number of cameras which is 12 in our setup.
Given IPD is normally 6.4 cms, i should be greater than 3.2 cm. This implies that with a 12-camera setup, the radius of the the rig comes to 14 cm(s). Usually, if there are more cameras it is easier to avoid black stripes.
For a truly immersive experience, users expect 4K (3840 x 2160) quality resolution at 60 frames per second (FPS) or higher. Given typical HMDs have a FOV of 120 degrees, a full 360° video needs a resolution of at least 12K (11520 x 6480). 4K streaming needs a bandwidth of 25 Mbps [9]. So for 12K resolution, this effectively translates to > 75 Mbps and even more for higher framerates. However, average wifi in US has bandwidth of 15 Mbps [10].
One way to address the bandwidth issue is by reducing the resolution of areas that are out of the field of view. Spatial sub-sampling is used during transcoding to produce multiple viewport-specific streams. Each viewport-specific stream has high resolution in a given viewport and low resolution in the rest of the sphere.
On the player side, we can modify traditional adaptive streaming logic to take into account field of view. Depending on the video, if the user moves his head around a lot, it could result in multiple buffer fetches and could result in rebuffering. Ideally, this will work best in videos where the excessive motion happens in one field of view at a time and does not span across multiple fields of view at the same time. This work is still in an experimental stage.
The default output format from stitching software of both Surround360 and Vahana VR is equirectangular format. In order to reduce the size further, we pass it through a cubemap filter transform integrated into ffmpeg to get an additional pixel reduction of ~25% [11] [12].
At the end of above steps, the stitching pipeline produces high-resolution stereo 3D panoramas which are then ingested into the existing Yahoo Video transcoding pipeline to produce multiple bit-rates HLS streams.
1.3. Adding a stitching step to the encoding pipeline
Live – In order to prepare for multi-bitrate streaming over the Internet, a live 360° video-stitched stream in RTMP is ingested into Yahoo’s video platform. A live Elemental encoder was used to re-encode and package the live input into multiple bit-rates for adaptive streaming on any device (iOS, Android, Browser, Windows, Mac, etc.)
Video on Demand – The existing Yahoo video transcoding pipeline was used to package multiple bit-rates HLS streams from raw equirectangular mp4 source videos.
1.4. Rendering 360° video into the player
The spherical video stream is delivered to the Yahoo player in multiple bit rates. As a user changes their viewing angle, different portion of the frame are shown, presenting a 360° immersive experience. There are two types of VR players currently supported at Yahoo:
WebVR based Javascript Player – The Web community has been very active in enabling VR experiences natively without plugins from within browsers. The W3C has a Javascript proposal [13], which describes support for accessing virtual reality (VR) devices, including sensors and head-mounted displays on the Web. VR Display is the main starting point for all the device APIs supported. Some of the key interfaces and attributes exposed are:
VR Display Capabilities: It has attributes to indicate position support, orientation support, and has external display.
VR Layer: Contains the HTML5 canvas element which is presented by VR Display when its submit frame is called. It also contains attributes defining the left bound and right bound textures within source canvas for presenting to an eye.
VREye Parameters: Has information required to correctly render a scene for given eye. For each eye, it has offset the distance from middle of the user’s eyes to the center point of one eye which is half of the interpupillary distance (IPD). In addition, it maintains the current FOV of the eye, and the recommended renderWidth and render Height of each eye viewport.
Get VR Displays: Returns a list of VR Display(s) HMDs accessible to the browser.
We implemented a subset of webvr spec in the Yahoo player (not in production yet) that lets you watch monoscopic and stereoscopic 3D video on supported web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Samsung), including Oculus Gear VR-enabled phones. The Yahoo player takes the equirectangular video and maps its individual frames on the Canvas javascript element. It uses the webGL and Three.JS libraries to do computations for detecting the orientation and extracting the corresponding frames to display.
For web devices which support only monoscopic rendering like desktop browsers without HMD, it creates a single Perspective Camera object specifying the FOV and aspect ratio. As the device’s requestAnimationFrame is called it renders the new frames. As part of rendering the frame, it first calculates the projection matrix for FOV and sets the X (user’s right), Y (Up), Z (behind the user) coordinates of the camera position.
For devices that support stereoscopic rendering like mobile phones from Samsung Gear, the webvr player creates two PerspectiveCamera objects, one for the left eye and one for the right eye. Each Perspective camera queries the VR device capabilities to get the eye parameters like FOV, renderWidth and render Height every time a frame needs to be rendered at the native refresh rate of HMD. The key difference between stereoscopic and monoscopic is the perceived sense of depth that the user experiences, as the video frames separated by an offset are rendered by separate canvas elements to each individual eye.
Cardboard VR – Google provides a VR sdk for both iOS and Android [14]. This simplifies common VR tasks like-lens distortion correction, spatial audio, head tracking, and stereoscopic side-by-side rendering. For iOS, we integrated Cardboard VR functionality into our Yahoo Video SDK, so that users can watch stereoscopic 3D videos on iOS using Google Cardboard.
2. Results
With all the pieces in place, and experimentation done, we were able to successfully do a 360° live streaming of an internal company-wide event.
Figure 8: 360° Live streaming of Yahoo internal event
In addition to demonstrating our live streaming capabilities, we are also experimenting with showing 360° VOD videos produced with a GoPro-based camera rig. Here is a screenshot of one of the 360° videos being played in the Yahoo player.
Figure 9: Yahoo Studios produced 360° VOD content in the Yahoo Player
3. Challenges and Opportunities
3.1. Enormous amounts of data
As we alluded to in the video processing section of this post, delivering 4K resolution videos for each eye for each FOV at a high frame-rate remains a challenge. While FOV-adaptive streaming does reduce the size by providing high resolution streams separately for each FOV, providing an impeccable 60 FPS or more viewing experience still requires a lot more data than the current internet pipes can handle. Some of the other possible options which we are closely paying attention to are:
Compression efficiency with HEVC and VP9 – New codecs like HEVC and VP9 have the potential to provide significant compression gains. HEVC open source codecs like x265 have shown a 40% compression performance gain compared to the currently ubiquitous H.264/AVC codec. LIkewise, a VP9 codec from Google has shown similar 40% compression performance gains. The key challenge is the hardware decoding support and the browser support. But with Apple and Microsoft very much behind HEVC and Firefox and Chrome already supporting VP9, we believe most browsers would support HEVC or VP9 within a year.
Using 10 bit color depth vs 8 bit color depth – Traditional monitors support 8 bpc (bits per channel) for displaying images. Given each pixel has 3 channels (RGB), 8 bpc maps to 256x256x256 color/luminosity combinations to represent 16 million colors. With 10 bit color depth, you have the potential to represent even more colors. But the biggest stated advantage of using 10 bit color depth is with respect to compression during encoding even if the source only uses 8 bits per channel. Both x264 and x265 codecs support 10 bit color depth, with ffmpeg already supporting encoding at 10 bit color depth.
3.2. Six degrees of freedom
With current camera rig workflows, users viewing the streams through HMD are able to achieve three degrees of Freedom (DoF) i.e., the ability to move up/down, clockwise/anti-clockwise, and swivel. But you still can’t get a different perspective when you move inside it i.e., move forward/backward. Until now, this true six DoF immersive VR experience has only been possible in CG VR games. In video streaming, LightField technology-based video cameras produced by Lytro are the first ones to capture light field volume data from all directions [15]. But Lightfield-based videos require an order of magnitude more data than traditional fixed FOV, fixed IPD, fixed lense camera rigs like GoPro. As bandwidth problems get resolved via better compressions and better networks, achieving true immersion should be possible.
4. Conclusion
VR streaming is an emerging medium and with the addition of 360° VR playback capability, Yahoo’s video platform provides us a great starting point to explore the opportunities in video with regard to virtual reality. As we continue to work to delight our users by showing immersive video content, we remain focused on optimizing the rendering of high-quality 4K content in our players. We’re looking at building FOV-based adaptive streaming capabilities and better compression during delivery. These capabilities, and the enhancement of our webvr player to play on more HMDs like HTC Vive and Oculus Rift, will set us on track to offer streaming capabilities across the entire spectrum. At the same time, we are keeping a close watch on advancements in supporting spatial audio experiences, as well as advancements in the ability to stream volumetric lightfield videos to achieve true six degrees of freedom, with the aim of realizing the true potential of VR.
Glossary – VR concepts:
VR – Virtual reality, commonly referred to as VR, is an immersive computer-simulated reality experience that places viewers inside an experience. It “transports” viewers from their physical reality into a closed virtual reality. VR usually requires a headset device that takes care of sights and sounds, while the most-involved experiences can include external motion tracking, and sensory inputs like touch and smell. For example, when you put on VR headgear you suddenly start feeling immersed in the sounds and sights of another universe, like the deck of the Star Trek Enterprise. Though you remain physically at your place, VR technology is designed to manipulate your senses in a manner that makes you truly feel as if you are on that ship, moving through the virtual environment and interacting with the crew.
360 degree video – A 360° video is created with a camera system that simultaneously records all 360 degrees of a scene. It is a flat equirectangular video projection that is morphed into a sphere for playback on a VR headset. A standard world map is an example of equirectangular projection, which maps the surface of the world (sphere) onto orthogonal coordinates.
Spatial Audio – Spatial audio gives the creator the ability to place sound around the user. Unlike traditional mono/stereo/surround audio, it responds to head rotation in sync with video. While listening to spatial audio content, the user receives a real-time binaural rendering of an audio stream [17].
FOV – A human can naturally see 170 degrees of viewable area (field of view). Most consumer grade head mounted displays HMD(s) like Oculus Rift and HTC Vive now display 90 degrees to 120 degrees.
Monoscopic video – A monoscopic video means that both eyes see a single flat image, or video file. A common camera setup involves six cameras filming six different fields of view. Stitching software is used to form a single equirectangular video. Max output resolution on 2D scopic videos on Gear VR is 3480×1920 at 30 frames per second.
Presence – Presence is a kind of immersion where the low-level systems of the brain are tricked to such an extent that they react just as they would to non-virtual stimuli.
Latency – It’s the time between when you move your head, and when you see physical updates on the screen. An acceptable latency is anywhere from 11 ms (for games) to 20 ms (for watching 360 vr videos).
Head Tracking – There are two forms:
Positional tracking – movements and related translations of your body, eg: sway side to side.
Traditional head tracking – left, right, up, down, roll like clock rotation.
There are two primary paradigms for the discovery of digital content. First is the search paradigm, in which the user is actively looking for specific content using search terms and filters (e.g., Google web search, Flickr image search, Yelprestaurant search, etc.). Second is a passive approach, in which the user browses content presented to them (e.g., NYTimes news, Flickr Explore, and Twitter trending topics). Personalization benefits both approaches by providing relevant content that is tailored to users’ tastes (e.g., Google News, Netflix homepage, LinkedIn job search, etc.). We believe personalization can improve the user experience at Flickr by guiding both new as well as more experienced members as they explore photography. Today, we’re excited to bring you personalized group recommendations.
If you’re not already familiar with Docker, it’s a method of packaging software to include not only your code, but also other components such as a full file system, system tools, services, and libraries. You can then run the software on multiple machines without a lot of setup. Docker calls these packages containers.
Think of it like a shipping container and you’ve got some idea of how it works. Shipping containers are a standard size so that they can be moved around at ports, and shipped via sea or land. They can also contain almost anything. Docker containers can hold your software’s code and its dependencies, so that it can easily run on many different machines. Developers often use them to create a web application server that runs on their own machine for development, and is then pushed to the cloud for the public to use.
From there, you can create your own container or download pre-made starter containers for your projects. The documentation is thorough and easy to follow.
Docker Swarm
One way you can use Raspberry Pi and Docker together is for Swarm. Used together, they can create a computer cluster. With Swarm containers on a bunch of networked Raspberry Pis, you can build a powerful machine and explore how a Docker Swarm works. Alex Ellis shows you how in this video:
The web is a great thing that’s come a long way, yadda yadda. It used to be an obscure nerd thing where you could read black Times New Roman text on a gray background. Now, it’s a hyper popular nerd thing where you can read black Helvetica Neue text on a white background. I hear it can do other stuff, too.
That said, I occasionally see little nagging reminders that the web is still quite primitive in some ways. One such nag: it has almost no way to preserve attribution, and sometimes actively strips it.
As a programmer, I’m here to propose some technical solutions to this social problem. It’s so easy! Why hasn’t anyone thought of this before?
I’m mostly thinking about images, but most of these ideas apply to other forms of media as well.
If you are familiar with The Twitter or other form of social media (read: website with people on it), you’ve seen some images float past. The vast majority were probably some form of artwork, interpreted loosely: maybe a photo, maybe a screenshot of part of an article.
Perhaps you have also asked the age-old question, where did this come from?
It can be surprisingly difficult to answer, and the web-savvy have a mental toolbox for figuring it out. You can try asking the person who tweeted it, but they might not know either, if it came from their hard drive or another social site. If it’s a screenshot of text, you can manually retype the text in a search engine and hope for the best. Otherwise, you can use reverse image search and… again, hope for the best. Ironically, a great deal of images on Twitter and Tumblr and Facebook don’t seem to be indexed by Google’s reverse image search, so if one of those is the original source (and a lot of people use Tumblr as a primary art gallery!), you’re out of luck.
The web is supposed to be a glorious land where anyone can contribute their own voice and work, so it’s a wee bit conspicuous to me that we’re pretty bad at preserving who made that stuff.
A lot of art sites do make some small effort at this. I looked at DeviantArt’s front page and the top item was Last Wish by radittz, for which the direct link is last_wish_by_radittz-dae07tz.jpg. If someone links the image directly (and this happens fairly frequently, for whatever reason), I have a pretty good idea of how to find the page dedicated to it.
If you save it, a little more effort is involved. If you don’t recognize DeviantArt’s particular filename pattern, you won’t even know what site it came from. (The da near the end seems to be constant, so maybe it’s meant to stand for “DeviantArt”, but to me it just looks like part of that nonsense slug.) You can try googling the filename, which sometimes works, but I don’t think Google itself indexes those. You can of course google the title and the artist name, and that’ll probably work — but if you have to use Google at all, the filename is clearly not working very well as a global identifier.
Non-art-gallery social sites, meanwhile, use unintelligible slurry as filenames. Twitter uses a short string of alphanumeric garbage. Facebook uses three long sequences of digits, separated by underscores. Tumblr is kind enough to start their filenames with tumblr_, which narrows it down a bit, but the rest is alphanumeric junk again. None of these platforms give you a way to get from an image filename back to an original post (and author!), and Google generally can’t make heads or tails of them. Even Google’s reverse image search generally comes up blank for an image that only exists on Tumblr.
The big three images formats — PNG, JPEG, and GIF — all support arbitrary metadata. It wouldn’t be terribly difficult to agree on some simple format for storing attribution. Show it in the UI, add it if it’s not there, and otherwise preserve it. Image metadata isn’t surfaced too well in a lot of image editors, but perhaps that’d start to change if it were used for something interesting and not just “this was made in Photoshop!”
The rest of this post is dedicated to explaining why that won’t possibly work. Sigh.
First question: what precisely do you attribute work to?
Hmm.
The obvious thing is that if you upload a new image to Twitter and it doesn’t already have some form of attribution, it gets attributed to your Twitter account. But that’s clearly not right. Maybe you have a website and think of that as identifying you. Or maybe you use Tumblr or DeviantArt or Twitch or whatever, and you think of one of those as your “primary” representation. You could always manually add the attribution metadata, but who would bother? I don’t know if I would bother.
Even quite a few years into the web game, we don’t have any real concept of global identifiers (say, URLs) for people. That’s kind of weird. We do have email addresses, but those are black holes you write to, not something you can read. (Various proposals have attempted to bridge this gap; none have caught on.)
Of course, individual platforms have little interest in trying to fill this gap, since they all want you to use them as your primary identity. Ever seen a small forum with built-in support for linking to your profile on a bunch of other sites? Enter your YouTube account name, and now your posts will have a tiny YouTube logo pointing straight there. Somehow these end up working as better hubs than huge platforms. Good luck linking to much of anything on Twitter: you can put one URL in the URL field, and you can sacrifice your bio and pinned tweet to squeeze a couple more in. Hell, I keep seeing Brand™ accounts that use Snapchat’s QR-code-esque thing for their avatars, which makes them all nigh indistinguishable.
Okay, what about attributing to whatever’s in the account’s URL field? I don’t know if that would work, either — this website doesn’t actually have my artwork on it. In fact, the more I think about this, the more I’d want the attribution to point to the original page hosting the work, not just the person. (Or… perhaps both?) That creates a chicken-and-egg problem that only the site you upload to can actually resolve.
What of creators that aren’t even people? Say, GIFs or screencaps from a TV show or movie. Does every TV show and movie have its own website? Does it make sense to attribute like that if you can’t even find the given material on those sites? Does anyone know or care where those websites are?
Art sites are probably willing to stick the uploader’s name in the filename because for the most part, the uploader is the creator. That’s the whole point of an art site, after all.
In a general-purpose forum, the uploader is almost certainly not the creator. That’s not a condemnation, just common sense: any given work can only be created once, but can be shared any number of times.
So if you’re Twitter, and you really buy into this whole idea, what do you do when someone uploads an image with no attribution? Do you leave it blank (somewhat defeating the purpose), attribute it to them (almost certainly wrong), or force them to enter something (a good way to kill your platform)?
If you’re uploading a screenshot of some text… where is the attribution ever going to come from? Built into your screenshot tool, by some demon magic?
Twitter also reminds me of kind of the inverse problem: it re-encodes your images as relatively low-quality JPEGs, even if they were already JPEGs! Twitter itself could just preserve the metadata when it does this, but how many other platforms resize or re-encode your uploads and lose the metadata in the process?
Remixing is great, but it raises some questions here.
If you have two source images and you edit them together somehow, who gets the attribution? You? One of the original creators? All three?
Okay, let’s say attribution is a list, and image editors are clever and know how to combine attributions. Now what if you only opened the image in your editor to scale it down, crop it, or (how ironic) erase the artist’s signature? Do you still get attribution?
There are already people who erase artists’ signatures from their work (for seemingly no reason; this is so baffling), and there would of course be people who erase the original attribution and claim it as their own. That’s thinking small, though.
If a wizard cast a spell to make this system widespread overnight, two things would immediately happen in quick succession.
Someone would build a thing to index attributions from all across the web, so you can search for a creator and find all of their work.
Some asshole would start adding false attributions to horrible images, so the search would make people they don’t like look bad.
I already hear someone yelling from the back about PGP signatures — for data I’m not sure how to reliably get onto files in the first place. Yeah. Good luck with that.
Twitter has a number of self-described “parody” accounts that exist solely to steal other people’s jokes, rack up followers, and then get paid big bucks by advertisers to drop in the occasional link to some skeezy thing that can’t survive on its own merits.
Twitter has, by and large, not done a goddamn thing about any of these. I can’t imagine them buying into a whole system of attribution.
Less obviously, consider: both Twitter and Tumblr prominently feature ways to share other people’s work while preserving the attribution (as long as they’re on the same platform, of course). Twitter has retweets; Tumblr has reblogs. However, neither of them have any way to browse through a user’s post history excluding reshares. Twitter has “images-only” view, but that only works if your work is visual, doesn’t include embeds, and includes other junk like photos of your cats; Tumblr has a standard archive view, which is at least nicer than scrolling back a page at a time, but makes it even harder to distinguish originals from reblogs.
Both platforms also treat work as semi-disposable: the primary interface is a chronological-ish deluge of stuff, and anything you miss is basically lost forever. They both archive everything back to the beginning of time, but navigating backwards on either is kind of painful. Especially Twitter, where you’re stuck with either infinite scrolling or manually filtering by date via Twitter search.
I guess the true problem here isn’t really metadata, but the sharp contrast between platforms for people who make stuff and platforms for people who look at stuff. (Most of us are some blend of both, of course — all the more reason that the separation sucks.) Twitter is made for looking and sharing, so it’s used by everyone but sucks for creators; something like Flickr is made for making, so it has a lot of relevant tools but isn’t very heavily frequented. The result is that work gets clumsily cross-posted all over the place, and it’s left to individual creators to come up with their own ad-hoc rituals for disseminating new work.
Even the maker platforms are struggling a bit lately. DeviantArt looks to be in decline since everyone flocked to Tumblr, but Tumblr is a poor substitute for an art gallery. YouTube is 70% pirated TV shows by volume. Twitch and other streaming sites treat work as even more disposable than Twitter, not saving it at all by default. (There are obvious economic reasons for this, but still.)
Embedding would be a helpful alternative solution to this: put your work on a maker platform, then just link it everywhere else. Twitter sort of does this already; I think Facebook does it a bit but is more limited in what it embeds; Tumblr basically doesn’t do it at all.
If Twitter is really the reigning champ in this area, then it’s in a pretty sorry state. Embeds are very clearly second-class citizens. If you post a few images on Tumblr as a photo set and then link them on Twitter, Twitter will only preview a crop of the first one, and you’ll have to click through to the actual Tumblr website (even on mobile, where it is buggy garbage) to get a full view or see the rest. Twitter’s preview doesn’t even hint that there are more.
Attribution seems like such a trivial thing for computers to track for us… yet it would take a complete overhaul of how we think about and handle media, plus buy-in from numerous large companies that aren’t known for cooperating with each other.
Maybe this isn’t a real problem. We seem to be managing okay so far. It nags at me from time to time, though, as a sign that the web just doesn’t interoperate with itself terribly well.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to link to this post on Twitter and Patreon.
So then. Aquaponics. I’d assumed it was something to do with growing underwater plants. Dead wrong.
My educative moment occurred at Disneyworld’s Epcot a couple of years ago. There’s a ride called The Land, where, after enduring a selection of creaking dioramas illustrating different US habitats, you’re taken on a little motorised punt thing on a watery track through greenhouses groaning under the weight of four-kilogramme mega-lemons, arboreal tomatoes and Mickey-shaped pumpkins.
Giant lemon, from Arild Finne Nybø on Flickr.
At the end of the…river thing…, you’ll find a section on aquaponics. An aquaponics system creates an incredibly efficient symbiotic environment for raising food. Aquatic food (prawns, fish and the like) is raised in water. Waste products from those creatures, which in an aquatic-only environment would degrade the quality of the water, are diverted into a hydroponic system, where nitrogen-fixing bacteria turn them into nitrates and nitrites, which are used to feed edible plants. The water can then be recirculated into the fish tank.
Finesse is required. You need to be able to monitor and control temperature, drainage and pumping. Professional systems are expensive, so the enterprising aquaponics practitioner will want to build their own. Enter the Raspberry Pi. And a shipping container, a shed and some valves.
Raspbery Pi Controlled IBC based Aquaponics. Details and scripts available at http://www.instructables.com/id/Raspberry-Pi-Controlled-Aquaponics/
MatthewH415, the maker, has documented the whole build at Instructables. He says:
This build uses the IBC method of Aquaponics, with modifications to include a Raspberry Pi for controlling a pump, solenoid drain, and temperature probes for water and air temperatures. The relays and timing is controlled with python scripting. Temperature and control data is collected every minute and sent to plot.ly for graphing, and future expansion will include sensors for water level and PH values for additional control.
All of my scripts are available at github.com, feel free to use them for your aquaponics setup. Thanks to Chris @ plot.ly for the help with streaming data to their service, and to the amazingly detailed build instructions provided at IBCofAquaponics.com.
We love it. Thanks Matthew; come the apocalypse, we at Pi Towers are happy in the safe and secure knowledge that we’ll at least have tilapia and cucumbers.
APIs are at the core of server-client communications, and well-defined API contracts are essential to the overall experience of client developer communities. At Yahoo, we have explored the best methods to develop APIs – both external (like apiary, apigee, API Gateway) and internal. In our examination, our main focus was to devise a methodology that provides a simple way to build new server endpoints, while guaranteeing a stable, streamlined integration for client developers. The workflow itself can be used with one of many domain-specific languages (DSL) for API modeling (e.g. Swagger, RAML, ardielle). The main driver for this project was a need to build a new generation of Flickr APIs. Flickr has had a long tradition of exposing rich capabilities via our API and innovating. One of Flickr’s contributions to this domain was inventing an early version of OAuth protocol. In this post, we will share a simple workflow that demonstrates the new approach to building APIs. For the purpose of this article we will focus on the Swagger, although the workflow can easily be adapted to use on another DSL.
Our goals for developing the workflow:
Standardize parts of the API but allow for them to be easily replaced or extended
Maximize automation opportunities
Auto-generation of documentation
SDKs
API validation tests
Drive efficiency with code re-usability
Focus on developer productivity
Well-documented, easy to use development tools
Easy to follow workflow
Room for customization
Encourage collaboration with the open source community
Use open standards
Use a DSL for interface modeling
What we tried before and why it didn’t work
Let’s take a look at two popular approaches to building APIs.
The first is an implementation-centric approach. Backend developers implement the service thus defining the API in the code. If you’re lucky there will be some code-level documentation – like javadoc – attached. Other teams (e.g., frontend, mobile, 3rd party engineers) have to read the javadoc and/or the code to understand the API contract nuances. They need to understand the programming language used, and the implementation has to be publicly available. Versioning may be tricky and the situation can get worse when multiple development teams work on different services that represent a single umbrella-project. There’s a chance that their APIs will fall out-of-sync, be it by implementing rate-limiting headers or by using different versioning models.
The other approach is to use in-house developed DSL and tools. There are already a slew of mature open source DSLs and tools available on the market, and opting for this route may be more efficient. Swagger is a perfect example. Many engineers know it and you can share your early API design with the open source community and get feedback. Also, there’s no extra learning curve involved so the chances that somebody will contribute are higher.
The New Workflow
API components
Let’s start by discussing the API elements we work with and what roles they play in the workflow:
Figure 1 – API components
API specification: the centerpiece of each service, including an API contract described in a well-defined and structured, human-readable format.
Documentation: developer-friendly API reference, a user’s guide and examples of API usage. Partially generated from API specification and partially hand-crafted.
SDKs (Software Development Kits): a set of programming language-specific libraries that simplify interactions with APIs. They typically abstract out lower layers (e.g. HTTP) and expose API input and output as concepts specific to the language (e.g. objects in Java). Partially generated from the API specification.
Implementation: the business logic that directs how APIs provide functionality. Validated against API specification via API tests.
API tests: tests validating the implementation against the specification.
API specification – separating contract from implementation
An API specification is one of the most important parts of a web service. You may want to consider keeping the contract definition separate from the implementation because it will allow you to:
Deliver the interface to customers faster (and get feedback sooner)
Keep your implementation private while still clearly communicating to customers what the service contract is
Describe APIs in a programming language-agnostic way to allow the use of different technologies for implementation
Work on SDKs, API documentation and clients in parallel to implementation
There are a few popular domain-specific languages that can be used for describing the contract of your service. At Flickr, we use Swagger, and keep all Swagger files in a GitHub repository called “api-spec”. It contains multiple yaml files that describe different parts of the API – both reusable elements and service-specific endpoint and resource definitions.
Figure 2 – Repository holding API specification
To give you a taste of Swagger here’s how a combined yaml file could look like:
Figure 3 – sample Swagger YAML file
One nice aspect of Swagger is the Swagger editor. It’s a browser-based IDE that shows you a live preview of your API documentation (generated from the spec) and also provides a console for querying mock backend implementation. Here’s how it looks like:
Figure 4 – API editor
Once the changes are approved and merged to master, a number of CD (continuous delivery) pipelines kick in: one per each SDK that we host and another pipeline for generating documentation. There is also an option of triggering a CD pipeline generating stubs for backend implementation but the decision is left up to the service owner.
The power of documentation
Documentation is the most important yet most unappreciated part of software engineering. At Yahoo, we devote lots of attention to documenting APIs, and in this workflow we keep the documentation in a separate GitHub repository. GitHub offers a great feature called GitHub Pages that allows us to host documentation on their servers and avoid building a custom CD pipeline for documentation. It also gives you the ability to edit files directly in the browser. GitHub pages are powered by Jekyll, which serves HTML pages directly from the repository. You use Markdown files to provide content, select a web template to use and push it to the “gh-pages” branch:
Figure 5 – documentation repository
The repo contains both a hand-crafted user’s guide and an automatically generated API reference. The API reference is generated from the API specification and put in a directory called “api-reference.
Figure 6 – API reference directory
The process of generating the API reference is executed by a simplistic CD pipeline. Every time you merge changes to the master branch of the API specification repository, it will assemble the yaml files into a single Swagger json file and submit it as a pull-request towards the documentation repository. Here’s the simple node.js script that does the transformation:
Figure 7 – merging multiple Swagger files
And a snippet from CD pipeline steps that creates the pull-request:
Figure 8 – generate documentation pull-request
The “api-reference” directory also contains the Swagger UI code, which is responsible for rendering the Swagger json file in the browser. It also provides a console that allows you to send requests against a test backend instance, and comes in very handy when a customer wants to quickly explore our APIs. Here’s how the final result looks:
Figure 9 – Swagger UI
Why having SDKs is important
Calling an API is fun. Dealing with failures, re-tries and HTTP connection issues – not so much. That’s where services which have a dedicated SDK really shine. An SDK can either be a thin wrapper around an HTTP client that deals with marshalling of requests and responses, or a fat client that has extra business logic in it. Since this extra business logic is handcrafted most of the time, we will exclude it from the discussion and focus on a thin client instead.
Thin API clients can usually be auto-generated from API specifications. We have a CD pipeline (similar to the documentation CD pipeline) that is responsible for this process. Each SDK is kept in a separate GitHub repository. For each API specification change, all SDKs are regenerated and pushed (as pull-requests) to appropriate repositories. Take a look at the swagger-codegen project to learn more about SDK generation.
It’s worth mentioning that the thin layer could also be generated in runtime based on the Swagger json file itself.
API implementation
The major question that pops out when implementing an API is: should we automatically generate the stub code? From our experience – it may be worth it, but most often it’s not. API stub scaffolding saves you some initial work when you add a new API. However, different service owners prefer to structure their code in various manners (packages, class names, how code is divided between REST controllers, etc.) and thus it’s expensive to develop a one-size-fits-all generator.
The last topic we want to cover is validating implementation against API specification. Validation happens via tests (written in Cucumber) that are executed with every change to the implementation. We validate API responses schema, different failure scenarios (for valid HTTP status code usage), returned headers, rate-limiting mechanism, pagination and others. To maximize code-reuse and simplify test code, we use one of the thin SDKs for API calls within tests.
Figure 10 – Implementation validation
Summary
In this article, we provided a simple, yet comprehensive, overview for working with APIs that we use at Flickr, and examined the key features, including clear separation of different system components (specification, implementation, documentation, sdks, tests), developer-friendliness and automation options. We also presented the workflow that binds all the components together in an easy to use, streamlined way.
When working with large-scale software systems, configuration management becomes crucial – supporting non-uniform environments gets greatly simplified, if you decouple code from configuration. While building complex software/products such as Flickr, we had to come up with a simple yet powerful way to manage configuration. Popular approaches to solving this problem include using configuration files or having a dedicated configuration service. Our new solution combines both the extremely popular GitHub and cfg4j library, giving you a very flexible approach that will work with applications of any size.
Why should I decouple configuration from the code?
Faster configuration changes (e.g. flipping feature toggles): Configuration can simply be injected without requiring parts of your code to be reloaded and re-executed. Config-only updates tend to be faster than code deployment
Different configuration for different environments: Running your app on a laptop or in a test environment requires a different set of settings than production instance
Keeping credentials private: If you don’t have a dedicated credential store, it may be convenient to keep credentials as part of configuration. They usually aren’t supposed to be “public” but the code still may be. Be a good sport and don’t keep credentials in a public GitHub repo 🙂
Meet the Gang: Overview of configuration management players
Let’s see what configuration-specific components we’ll be working with today:
Figure 1 – Overview of configuration management components Configuration repository and editor: Where your configuration lives. We’re using Git for storing configuration files and GitHub as an ad hoc editor.
Push cache : Intermediary store that we use to improve fetch speed and to ease load on GitHub servers.
CD pipeline: Continuous deployment pipeline pushing changes from repository to push cache and validating config correctness.
Configuration library: Fetches configs from push cache and exposing them to your business logic. Bootstrap configuration : Initial configuration specifying where your push cache is located (so that library knows where to get configuration from). All these players work as a team to provide an end-to-end configuration management solution.
The Coach: Configuration repository and editor
The first thing you might expect from the configuration repository and editor is ease of use. Let’s enumerate what that means:
Configuration should be easy to read and write It should be straightforward to add a new configuration set You most certainly want to be able to review changes if your team is bigger than one person It’s nice to see a history of changes, especially when you’re trying to fix a bug at the middle of night Support from popular IDEs – freedom of choice is priceless Multi-tenancy support (optional) is often pragmatic So what options are out there that may satisfy those requirements? The three very popular formats for storing configuration are YAML, Java Property files, and XML files. We use YAML because it is widely supported by multiple programming languages and IDEs and it’s very readable and easy to understand, even for the non-engineer.
We could use a dedicated configuration store; however, the great thing about files is that they can be easily versioned by version control tools like Git, which we decided to use as it’s widely known and proven.
Git provides us with a history of changes and an easy way to branch off configuration. It also has great support in the form of GitHub which we use both as an editor (built-in support for YAML files) and collaboration tool (pull requests, forks, review tool). Both are nicely glued together by following the Git flow branching model. Here’s an example of configuration file that we use:
Figure 2 – configuration file preview One of the goals was to make managing multiple configuration sets (execution environments) a breeze. We needed the ability to add and remove environments quickly. If you look at the screenshot below, you’ll notice a “prod-us-east” directory in the path. For every environment, we stored a separate directory with config files in Git. All of them have the exact same structure and only differ in YAML file contents.
This solution makes working with environments simple and comes in very handy during local development or new production fleet rollout (see use cases at the end of this article). Here’s a sample config repo for a project that has only one “feature”:
Figure 3 – support for multiple environments Some of the products that we work with at Yahoo have a very granular architecture – hundreds of micro-services working together. For scenarios like this, it’s convenient to store configurations for all services in a single repository, which greatly reduces the overhead of maintaining multiple repositories. We support this use case by having multiple top-level directories each holding configurations for one service only.
The Sprinter: Push cache
The main role of push cache is to decrease load put on the GitHub server and improve configuration fetch time. Since speed is the only concern here, we decided to keep the push cache simple – it’s just a key-value store. Consul was our choice: the nice thing is that it’s fully distributed.
You can install Consul clients on the edge nodes and they will keep being synchronized across the fleet. This greatly improves both reliability and performance of the system. If performance is not a concern, any key-value store will do. You can skip using push cache altogether and connect directly to Github, which comes in handy during development (see use cases below to learn more about this).
The Manager: CD Pipeline
When the configuration repository is updated, a CD pipeline kicks in. This fetches configuration, converts it into a more optimized format and pushes it to the cache. Additionally, the CD pipeline validates the configuration (once at the pull-request stage and again after being merged to master) and controls multi-phase deployment by deploying config change to only 20% of production hosts at one time.
The Mascot: Bootstrap configuration
Before we can connect to the push cache to fetch configuration we need to know where it is. That’s where bootstrap configuration comes into play – it’s very simple. The config contains the hostname, port to connect to, and the name of the environment to use. You need to put this config with your code or as part of the CD pipeline. This simple yaml file binding Spring profiles to different Consul hosts suffices for our needs:
Figure 4 – bootstrap configuration
The Cool Guy: Configuration library
The configuration library takes care of fetching the configuration from push cache and exposing it to your business logic. We use the library called cfg4j (“configuration for java”). This library re-loads configurations from the push cache every few seconds and injects them into configuration objects that our code uses. It also takes care of local caching, merging properties from different repositories, and falling back to user-provided defaults when necessary (read more at http://www.cfg4j.org/).Briefly summarizing how we use cfg4j’s features:
Configuration auto-reloading: Each service reloads configuration every ~30 seconds and auto re-configures itself. Multi-environment support: for our multiple environments (beta, performance, canary, production-us-west, production-us-east, etc.).
Local caching: Remedies service interruption when the push cache or configuration repository is down and also improves the performance for obtaining configs.
Fallback and merge strategies: Simplifies local development and provides support for multiple configuration repositories. Integration with Dependency Injection containers: because we love DI :D. If you want to play with this library yourself, there’s plenty of examples both in its documentation and cfg4j-sample-apps Github repository.
The Heavy Lifter: Configurable code The most important piece is business logic. To best make use of a configuration service, the business logic has to be able to re-configure itself in runtime. Here are a few rules of thumb and code samples: Use dependency injection for injecting configuration. This is how we do it using Spring Framework (see the bootstrap configuration above for host/port values):
Use configuration objects to inject configuration instead of providing configuration directly – here’s where the difference is: Direct configuration injection (won’t reload as config changes) Configuration injection via “interface binding” (will reload as config changes): The exercise: Common use-cases (applying our simple solution)
Configuration during development (local overrides)
When you develop a feature, a main concern is the ability to evolve your code quickly. A full configuration management pipeline is not conducive to this ability. We use the following approaches when doing local development:
Add a temporary configuration file to the project and use cfg4j’s MergeConfigurationSource for reading config both from the configuration store and your file. By making your local file a primary configuration source, you provide an override mechanism. If the property is found in your file, it will be used. If not, cfg4j will fall back to using values from configuration store. Here’s an example (reference examples above to get a complete code): Fork the configuration repository, make changes to the fork and use cfg4j’s GitConfigurationSource to access it directly (no push cache required): Set up your private push cache, point your service to the cache and edit values in it directly. Configuration defaults
When you work with multiple environments, some of them may share a common configuration. That’s when using configuration defaults may be convenient. You can do this by creating a “default” environment and using cfg4j’s MergeConfigurationSource for reading config first from the original environment and then (as a fallback) from the “default” environment.
Dealing with outages
Configuration repository, push cache and configuration CD pipeline can experience outages. To minimize impact of such events, it’s good practice to cache the configuration locally (in-memory) after each fetch. cfg4j does that automatically.
Responding to incidents – ultra fast configuration updates (skipping configuration CD pipeline) Tests can’t always detect all problems. Bugs leak to production environment and at times it’s important to make a config change as fast as possible to stop the fire. If you’re using push cache, the fastest way to modify config values is to make changes directly within the cache. Consul offers a rich REST API and web UI for updating configuration in the key-value store.
Keeping code and configuration in sync Verifying that code and configuration are kept in sync happens at the configuration CD pipeline level. One part of the continuous deployment process deploys the code into a temporary execution environment, and pointing it to the branch that contains the configuration changes. Once the service is up, we execute a batch of functional tests to verify configuration correctness.
The cool down: Summary The presented solution is the result of work that we put into building huge-scale photo-serving services. We needed a simple yet flexible configuration management system, and combining Git, Github, Consul and cfg4j provided a very satisfactory solution that we encourage you to try.
I want to thank the following people for reviewing this article: Bhautik Joshi, Elanna Belanger, Archie Russell.
Още една година, още една Баба Марта. Отново направих мартеници по метода, за който писах преди 8 години. Този път обаче ми помага и Калина тичайки след усукващата се мартеница. По-долу е снимката на резултата. Същите са както през 2009-та, 2011, 2012 и 2013. Направих и още по-голяма мартеница за входната врата. Ето ги и малките мартеници: Тази година забелязах и нещо интересно. В една от статиите ми от преди 7 години снимах мартениците на ръката си. Открих, че се използва в доста статии обясняващи традицията на мартеницата. Доста от тях са в украински и руски сайтове. Някои от тях се виждат в това търсене в Google. Предполагам, че причината е в това, че при търсене на „мартеница“ на кирилица и латиница снимката излизаше сред първите места. Вече не излиза, тъй като изтрих акаунта си във Flickr заедно с всички снимки в него.
By Andy Feng(@afeng76), Jun Shi and Mridul Jain (@mridul_jain), Yahoo Big ML Team Introduction Deep learning (DL) is a critical capability required by Yahoo product teams (ex. Flickr, Image Search) to gain intelligence from massive amounts of online data. Many existing DL frameworks require a separated cluster for deep learning, and multiple programs have to be created for a typical machine learning pipeline (see Figure 1). The separated clusters require large datasets to be transferred among them, and introduce unwanted system complexity and latency for end-to-end learning. Figure 1: ML Pipeline with multiple programs on separated clusters
As discussed in our earlier Tumblr post, we believe that deep learning should be conducted in the same cluster along with existing data processing pipelines to support feature engineering and traditional (non-deep) machine learning. We created CaffeOnSpark to allow deep learning training and testing to be embedded into Spark applications (see Figure 2). Figure 2: ML Pipeline with single program on one cluster
CaffeOnSpark: API & Configuration and CLI
CaffeOnSpark is designed to be a Spark deep learning package. Spark MLlib supported a variety of non-deep learning algorithms for classification, regression, clustering, recommendation, and so on. Deep learning is a key capacity that Spark MLlib lacks currently, and CaffeOnSpark is designed to fill that gap. CaffeOnSpark API supports dataframes so that you can easily interface with a training dataset that was prepared using a Spark application, and extract the predictions from the model or features from intermediate layers for results and data analysis using MLLib or SQL. Figure 3: CaffeOnSpark as a Spark Deep Learning package
1: def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = { 2: val ctx = new SparkContext(new SparkConf()) 3: val cos = new CaffeOnSpark(ctx) 4: val conf = new Config(ctx, args).init() 5: val dl_train_source = DataSource.getSource(conf, true) 6: cos.train(dl_train_source) 7: val lr_raw_source = DataSource.getSource(conf, false) 8: val extracted_df = cos.features(lr_raw_source) 9: val lr_input_df = extracted_df.withColumn(“Label”, cos.floatarray2doubleUDF(extracted_df(conf.label))) 10: .withColumn(“Feature”, cos.floatarray2doublevectorUDF(extracted_df(conf.features(0)))) 11: val lr = new LogisticRegression().setLabelCol(“Label”).setFeaturesCol(“Feature”) 12: val lr_model = lr.fit(lr_input_df) 13: lr_model.write.overwrite().save(conf.outputPath) 14: }
Scala program in Figure 4 illustrates how CaffeOnSpark and MLlib work together: L1-L4 … You initialize a Spark context, and use it to create CaffeOnSpark and configuration object. L5-L6 … You use CaffeOnSpark to conduct DNN training with a training dataset on HDFS. L7-L8 …. The learned DL model is applied to extract features from a feature dataset on HDFS. L9-L12 … MLlib uses the extracted features to perform non-deep learning (more specifically logistic regression for classification). L13 … You could save the classification model onto HDFS.
As illustrated in Figure 4, CaffeOnSpark enables deep learning steps to be seamlessly embedded in Spark applications. It eliminates unwanted data movement in traditional solutions (as illustrated in Figure 1), and enables deep learning to be conducted on big-data clusters directly. Direct access to big-data and massive computation power are critical for DL to find meaningful insights in a timely manner. CaffeOnSpark uses the configuration files for solvers and neural network as in standard Caffe uses. As illustrated in our example, the neural network will have a MemoryData layer with 2 extra parameters:
CaffeOnSpark applications will be launched by standard Spark commands, such as spark-submit. Here are 2 examples of spark-submit commands. The first command uses CaffeOnSpark to train a DNN model saved onto HDFS. The second command is a custom Spark application that embedded CaffeOnSpark along with MLlib. First command: spark-submit –files caffenet_train_solver.prototxt,caffenet_train_net.prototxt –num-executors 2 –class com.yahoo.ml.caffe.CaffeOnSpark caffe-grid-0.1-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies.jar -train -persistent -conf caffenet_train_solver.prototxt -model hdfs:///sample_images.model -devices 2 Second command:
Figure 5 describes the system architecture of CaffeOnSpark. We launch Caffe engines on GPU devices or CPU devices within the Spark executor, via invoking a JNI layer with fine-grain memory management. Unlike traditional Spark applications, CaffeOnSpark executors communicate to each other via MPI allreduce style interface via TCP/Ethernet or RDMA/Infiniband. This Spark+MPI architecture enables CaffeOnSpark to achieve similar performance as dedicated deep learning clusters. Many deep learning jobs are long running, and it is important to handle potential system failures. CaffeOnSpark enables training state being snapshotted periodically, and thus we could resume from previous state after a failure of a CaffeOnSpark job. Open Source In the last several quarters, Yahoo has applied CaffeOnSpark on several projects, and we have received much positive feedback from our internal users. Flickr teams, for example, made significant improvements on image recognition accuracy with CaffeOnSpark by training with millions of photos from the Yahoo Webscope Flickr Creative Commons 100M dataset on Hadoop clusters. CaffeOnSpark is beneficial to deep learning community and the Spark community. In order to advance the fields of deep learning and artificial intelligence, Yahoo is happy to release CaffeOnSpark at github.com/yahoo/CaffeOnSpark under Apache 2.0 license. CaffeOnSpark can be tested on an AWS EC2 cloud or on your own Spark clusters. Please find the detailed instructions at Yahoo github repository, and share your feedback at [email protected]. Our goal is to make CaffeOnSpark widely available to deep learning scientists and researchers, and we welcome contributions from the community to make that happen. .
by Peter Cnudde, VP of Engineering It is hard to believe that 10 years have already passed since Hadoop was started at Yahoo. We initially applied it to web search, but since then, Hadoop has become central to everything we do at the company. Today, Hadoop is the de facto platform for processing and storing big data for thousands of companies around the world, including most of the Fortune 500. It has also given birth to a thriving industry around it, comprised of a number of companies who have built their businesses on the platform and continue to invest and innovate to expand its capabilities. At Yahoo, Hadoop remains a cornerstone technology on which virtually every part of our business relies on to power our world-class products, and deliver user experiences that delight more than a billion users worldwide. Whether it is content personalization for increasing engagement, ad targeting and optimization for serving the right ad to the right consumer, new revenue streams from native ads and mobile search monetization, data processing pipelines, mail anti-spam or search assist and analytics – Hadoop touches them all. When it comes to scale, Yahoo still boasts one of the largest Hadoop deployments in the world. From a footprint standpoint, we maintain over 35,000 Hadoop servers as a central hosted platform running across 16 clusters with a combined 600 petabytes in storage capacity (HDFS), allowing us to execute 34 million monthly compute jobs on the platform. But we aren’t stopping there, and actively collaborate with the Hadoop community to further push the scalability boundaries and advance technological innovation. We have used MapReduce historically to power batch-oriented processing, but continue to invest in and adopt low latency data processing stacks on top of Hadoop, such as Storm for stream processing, and Tez and Spark for faster batch processing. What’s more, the applications of these innovations have spanned the gamut – from cool and fun features, like Flickr’s Magic View to one of our most exciting recent projects that involves combining Apache Spark and Caffe. The project allows us to leverage GPUs to power deep learning on Hadoop clusters. This custom deployment bridges the gap between HPC (High Performance Computing) and big data, and is helping position Yahoo as a frontrunner in the next generation of computing and machine learning. We’re delighted by the impact the platform has made to the big data movement, and can’t wait to see what the next 10 years has in store. Cheers!
Archie Russell, Peter Norby, Saeideh BakhshiAt Flickr our users really care about image quality. They also care a lot about how responsive our apps are. Addressing both of these concerns simultaneously is challenging; higher quality images have larger file sizes and are slower to transfer. Slow transfers are especially noticeable on mobile devices. Flickr had historically targeted the high image quality, but in late 2014 we implemented a method to both maintain image quality and decrease file size. As image appearance is very important to our users, we performed an extensive user test before rolling this change out. Here’s how we did it.Background: JPEG Quality SettingsJPEG compression has several tunable knobs. The q-value is the best known of these; it adjusts the level of spatial detail stored for fine details: a higher q-value typically keeps more detail. However, as q-value gets very close to 100, file size increases dramatically, usually without improving image appearance.If file size and app performance isn’t an issue, dialing up q-value is an easy way to get really nice-looking images; this is what Flickr has done in the past. And if appearance isn’t very important, dialing down q-value is a viable option. But if you want both, you’re kind of stuck. Additionally, q-value is not one size fits all, some images look great at q-value 80 while others don’t.Another commonly adjusted setting is chroma-subsampling, which alters the amount of color information stored in a JPEG file. With a setting of 4:4:4, the two chroma (color) channels in a JPG have as much information as the luminance channel. In an image with a setting of 4:2:0, each chroma channel has only a quarter as much information as in an a 4:4:4 image.q=96, chroma=4:4:4 (125KB)q=70, chroma=4:4:4 (67KB)q=96, chroma=4:2:0 (62KB)a=70, chroma=4:2:0 (62KB)Table 1: JPEG stored at different quality and chroma levels. The top image is saved at high quality and chroma level – notice the color and detail in the folds of the red flag. The bottom image has the lowest quality – notice artifacts along the right edges of the red flag.Perceptual JPEG CompressionIdeally, we’d have an algorithm which automatically tuned all JPEG parameters to make a file smaller, but which would limit perceptible changes to the image. Technology exists that attempts to do this and can decrease image file size by over 30%. This compression ratio is highly dependent on image content and dimensions.Fig 2. Compressed (l) and uncompressed ® images. Compressed image is 36% smaller.We were pleased with perceptually compressed images in cursory examinations, compressed images were smaller and nearly indistinguishable from their sources. But we wanted to really quantify how well it worked before rolling it out. The standard computational tools for evaluating compression, such as SSIM, are fairly simplistic and don’t do a great job at modeling how a user sees things. To really evaluate this technology had to use a better measure of perceptibility: human minds. To test whether our image compression would impact user perception of image quality, we put together a “taste test”. The taste test was constructed as a game with multiple rounds where users looked at both compressed and uncompressed images. Users accumulated points the longer they played, and got more points for doing well at the game. We maintained a leaderboard to encourage participation and used only internal testers. The game’s test images came from a diverse collection of 250 images contributed by Flickr staff. The images came from a variety of cameras and included a number of subjects from photographers with varying skill levels.In each round, our test code randomly selected a test image, and presented two variants of this image side by side. 50% of the time we presented the user two identical images; the rest of the time we presented one compressed image and one uncompressed image. We asked the tester if the two images looked the same or different. We expected a user choosing randomly OR a user unable to distinguish the two cases would answer correctly about half the time. We randomly swapped the location of the compressed images to compensate for user bias to the left or the right. If testers chose correctly, they were presented with a second question: "Which image did you prefer, and why?”Fig 4. Screenshot of taste test.Our test displayed images simultaneously to prevent testers noticing a longer load time for the larger, non-compressed image. The images were presented with either 320, 640, or 1600 pixels on their longest side. The 320 & 640px images were shown for 12 seconds before being dimmed out. The intent behind this detail was to represent how real users interacted with our images. The 1600px images stayed on screen for 20 seconds, as we expected larger images to be viewed for longer periods of time by real users.Taste Test Outcome and DeploymentWe ran our taste test for two weeks and analyzed our results. Although we let users play as long as they liked, we skipped the first result per user as a “warm-up” and considered only the subsequent ten results, which limited the potential for users training themselves to spot compression artifacts. We disregarded users that had fewer than eleven results.Table 2. Taste test results. Testers selected “identical” at nearly the same rate, whether the input was identical or not.When our testers were presented with two identical images, they thought the images were identical only 68.8% of the time(!), and when presented with a compressed image next to a non-compressed image, our testers thought the images were identical slightly less often: 67.6% of the time. This difference was small enough for us, and our statisticians told us it was statistically insignificant. Our image pairs were so similar that multiple testers thought all images were identical and reported that the test system was buggy. We inspected the images most often labeled different, and found no significant artifacts in the compressed versions.So even in this side-by-side test, perceptual image compression was just barely noticeable when images were presented side-by-side. As the Flickr website wouldn’t ever show compressed and uncompressed images at the same time, and the use of compression had large benefits in storage footprint and site performance, we elected to go forward.At the beginning of 2014 we silently rolled out perceptual-based compression on our image thumbnails (we don’t alter the “original” images uploaded by our users). The slight changes to image appearance went unnoticed by users, but user interactions with Flickr became much faster, especially for users with slow connections, while our storage footprint became much smaller. This was a best-case scenario for us.Evaluating perceptual compression was a considerable task, but it gave the confidence we needed to apply this compression in production to our users. This marked the first time Flickr had adjusted image settings in years, and, it was fun.Fig 5. Taste test high score listEpilogueAfter eighteen months of perceptual compression at Flickr, we adjusted our settings slightly to shrink images an additional 15%. For our users on mobile devices, 15% fewer bytes per image makes for a much more responsive experience. We had run a taste test on this newer setting and users were were able to spot our compression slightly more often than with our original settings. When presented a pair of identical images, our testers declared these images identical 65.2% of the time, when presented with different images, our testers declared the images identical 62% of the time. It wasn’t as imperceptible as our original approach, but, we decided it was close enough to roll out.Boy were we wrong! A few very vocal users spotted the compression and didn’t like it at all. The Flickr Help Forum had a very lively thread which Petapixel picked up. We beat our heads against the wall considered our options and came up with a middle path between our initial and follow-on approaches, giving us smaller, faster-to-load files while still maintaining the appearance our users expect.Through our use of perceptual compression, combined with our use of on-the-fly resize and COS, we were able to decrease our storage footprint dramatically, while simultaneously improving user experience. It’s a win all around but we’re not done yet — we still have a few tricks up our sleeves.
The collective thoughts of the interwebz
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
Figure 3: CaffeOnSpark as a Spark Deep Learning package
Figure 5: System Architecture
It is hard to believe that 10 years have already passed since Hadoop was started at Yahoo. We initially applied it to web search, but since then, Hadoop has become central to everything we do at the company. Today, Hadoop is the de facto platform for processing and storing big data for thousands of companies around the world, including most of the Fortune 500. It has also given birth to a thriving industry around it, comprised of a number of companies who have built their businesses on the platform and continue to invest and innovate to expand its capabilities.
Another commonly adjusted setting is chroma-subsampling, which alters the amount of color information stored in a JPEG file. With a setting of 4:4:4, the two chroma (color) channels in a JPG have as much information as the luminance channel. In an image with a setting of 4:2:0, each chroma channel has only a quarter as much information as in an a 4:4:4 image.
q=96, chroma=4:4:4 (125KB)
q=70, chroma=4:4:4 (67KB)
q=96, chroma=4:2:0 (62KB)
a=70, chroma=4:2:0 (62KB)Table 1: JPEG stored at different quality and chroma levels. The top image is saved at high quality and chroma level – notice the color and detail in the folds of the red flag. The bottom image has the lowest quality – notice artifacts along the right edges of the red flag.Perceptual JPEG CompressionIdeally, we’d have an algorithm which automatically tuned all JPEG parameters to make a file smaller, but which would limit perceptible changes to the image. Technology exists that attempts to do this and can decrease image file size by over 30%. This compression ratio is highly dependent on image content and dimensions.
Fig 2. Compressed (l) and uncompressed ® images. Compressed image is 36% smaller.We were pleased with perceptually compressed images in cursory examinations, compressed images were smaller and nearly indistinguishable from their sources. But we wanted to really quantify how well it worked before rolling it out. The standard computational tools for evaluating compression, such as SSIM, are fairly simplistic and don’t do a great job at modeling how a user sees things. To really evaluate this technology had to use a better measure of perceptibility: human minds. 
To test whether our image compression would impact user perception of image quality, we put together a “taste test”. The taste test was constructed as a game with multiple rounds where users looked at both compressed and uncompressed images. Users accumulated points the longer they played, and got more points for doing well at the game. We maintained a leaderboard to encourage participation and used only internal testers. The game’s test images came from a diverse collection of 250 images contributed by Flickr staff. The images came from a variety of cameras and included a number of subjects from photographers with varying skill levels.
In each round, our test code randomly selected a test image, and presented two variants of this image side by side. 50% of the time we presented the user two identical images; the rest of the time we presented one compressed image and one uncompressed image. We asked the tester if the two images looked the same or different. We expected a user choosing randomly OR a user unable to distinguish the two cases would answer correctly about half the time. We randomly swapped the location of the compressed images to compensate for user bias to the left or the right. If testers chose correctly, they were presented with a second question: "Which image did you prefer, and why?”
Fig 4. Screenshot of taste test.Our test displayed images simultaneously to prevent testers noticing a longer load time for the larger, non-compressed image. The images were presented with either 320, 640, or 1600 pixels on their longest side. The 320 & 640px images were shown for 12 seconds before being dimmed out. The intent behind this detail was to represent how real users interacted with our images. The 1600px images stayed on screen for 20 seconds, as we expected larger images to be viewed for longer periods of time by real users.Taste Test Outcome and DeploymentWe ran our taste test for two weeks and analyzed our results. Although we let users play as long as they liked, we skipped the first result per user as a “warm-up” and considered only the subsequent ten results, which limited the potential for users training themselves to spot compression artifacts. We disregarded users that had fewer than eleven results.
Table 2. Taste test results. Testers selected “identical” at nearly the same rate, whether the input was identical or not.When our testers were presented with two identical images, they thought the images were identical only 68.8% of the time(!), and when presented with a compressed image next to a non-compressed image, our testers thought the images were identical slightly less often: 67.6% of the time. This difference was small enough for us, and our statisticians told us it was statistically insignificant. Our image pairs were so similar that multiple testers thought all images were identical and reported that the test system was buggy. We inspected the images most often labeled different, and found no significant artifacts in the compressed versions.So even in this side-by-side test, perceptual image compression was just barely noticeable when images were presented side-by-side. As the Flickr website wouldn’t ever show compressed and uncompressed images at the same time, and the use of compression had large benefits in storage footprint and site performance, we elected to go forward.At the beginning of 2014 we silently rolled out perceptual-based compression on our image thumbnails (we don’t alter the “original” images uploaded by our users). The slight changes to image appearance went unnoticed by users, but user interactions with Flickr became much faster, especially for users with slow connections, while our storage footprint became much smaller. This was a best-case scenario for us.Evaluating perceptual compression was a considerable task, but it gave the confidence we needed to apply this compression in production to our users. This marked the first time Flickr had adjusted image settings in years, and, it was fun.
Fig 5. Taste test high score listEpilogueAfter eighteen months of perceptual compression at Flickr, we adjusted our settings slightly to shrink images an additional 15%. For our users on mobile devices, 15% fewer bytes per image makes for a much more responsive experience. We had run a taste test on this newer setting and users were were able to spot our compression slightly more often than with our original settings. When presented a pair of identical images, our testers declared these images identical 65.2% of the time, when presented with different images, our testers declared the images identical 62% of the time. It wasn’t as imperceptible as our original approach, but, we decided it was close enough to roll out.Boy were we wrong! A few very vocal users spotted the compression and didn’t like it at all. The Flickr Help Forum had a very lively thread which 