The Mozilla blog has an article describing the addition of DNS over HTTPS (DoH) as an optional feature in the Firefox browser. “DoH support has been added to Firefox 62 to improve the way Firefox interacts with DNS. DoH uses encrypted networking to obtain DNS information from a server that is configured within Firefox. This means that DNS requests sent to the DoH cloud server are encrypted while old style DNS requests are not protected.” The configured server is hosted by Cloudflare, which has posted this privacy agreement about the service.
Previously, I showed you how to rotate Amazon RDS database credentials automatically with AWS Secrets Manager. In addition to database credentials, AWS Secrets Manager makes it easier to rotate, manage, and retrieve API keys, OAuth tokens, and other secrets throughout their lifecycle. You can configure Secrets Manager to rotate these secrets automatically, which can help you meet your compliance needs. You can also use Secrets Manager to rotate secrets on demand, which can help you respond quickly to security events. In this post, I show you how to store an API key in Secrets Manager and use a custom Lambda function to rotate the key automatically. I’ll use a Twitter API key and bearer token as an example; you can reference this example to rotate other types of API keys.
The instructions are divided into four main phases:
Store a Twitter API key and bearer token in Secrets Manager.
Create a custom Lambda function to rotate the bearer token.
Configure your application to retrieve the bearer token from Secrets Manager.
Configure Secrets Manager to use the custom Lambda function to rotate the bearer token automatically.
For the purpose of this post, I use the placeholder Demo/Twitter_Api_Key to denote the API key, the placeholder Demo/Twitter_bearer_token to denote the bearer token, and placeholder Lambda_Rotate_Bearer_Token to denote the custom Lambda function. Be sure to replace these placeholders with the resource names from your account.
Phase 1: Store a Twitter API key and bearer token in Secrets Manager
Twitter enables developers to register their applications and retrieve an API key, which includes a consumer_key and consumer_secret. Developers use these to generate a bearer token that applications can then use to authenticate and retrieve information from Twitter. At any given point of time, you can use an API key to create only one valid bearer token.
Start by storing the API key in Secrets Manager. Here’s how:
Figure 1: The “Store a new secret” button in the AWS Secrets Manager console
Select Other type of secrets (because you’re storing an API key).
Input the consumer_key and consumer_secret, and then select Next.
Figure 2: Select the consumer_key and the consumer_secret
Specify values for Secret Name and Description, then select Next. For this example, I use Demo/Twitter_API_Key.
Figure 3: Set values for “Secret Name” and “Description”
On the next screen, keep the default setting, Disable automatic rotation, because you’ll use the same API key to rotate bearer tokens programmatically and automatically. Applications and employees will not retrieve this API key. Select Next.
Figure 4: Keep the default “Disable automatic rotation” setting
Review the information on the next screen and, if everything looks correct, select Store. You’ve now successfully stored a Twitter API key in Secrets Manager.
Next, store the bearer token in Secrets Manager. Here’s how:
From the Secrets Manager console, select Store a new secret, select Other type of secrets, input details (access_token, token_type, and ARN of the API key) about the bearer token, and then select Next.
Figure 5: Add details about the bearer token
Specify values for Secret Name and Description, and then select Next. For this example, I use Demo/Twitter_bearer_token.
Figure 6: Again set values for “Secret Name” and “Description”
Keep the default rotation setting, Disable automatic rotation, and then select Next. You’ll enable rotation after you’ve updated the application to use Secrets Manager APIs to retrieve secrets.
Review the information and select Store. You’ve now completed storing the bearer token in Secrets Manager. I take note of the sample code provided on the review page. I’ll use this code to update my application to retrieve the bearer token using Secrets Manager APIs.
Figure 7: The sample code you can use in your app
Phase 2: Create a custom Lambda function to rotate the bearer token
While Secrets Manager supports rotating credentials for databases hosted on Amazon RDS natively, it also enables you to meet your unique rotation-related use cases by authoring custom Lambda functions. Now that you’ve stored the API key and bearer token, you’ll create a Lambda function to rotate the bearer token. For this example, I’ll create my Lambda function using Python 3.6.
Figure 8: In the Lambda console, select “Create function”
Select Author from scratch. For this example, I use the name Lambda_Rotate_Bearer_Token for my Lambda function. I also set the Runtime environment as Python 3.6.
Figure 9: Create a new function from scratch
This Lambda function requires permissions to call AWS resources on your behalf. To grant these permissions, select Create a custom role. This opens a console tab.
Select Create a new IAM Role and specify the value for Role Name. For this example, I use Role_Lambda_Rotate_Twitter_Bearer_Token.
Figure 10: For “IAM Role,” select “Create a new IAM role”
Next, to define the IAM permissions, copy and paste the following IAM policy in the View Policy Document text-entry field. Be sure to replace the placeholder ARN-OF-Demo/Twitter_API_Key with the ARN of your secret.
Figure 11: The IAM policy pasted in the “View Policy Document” text-entry field
Now, select Allow. This brings me back to the Lambda console with the appropriate Role selected.
Select Create function.
Figure 12: Select the “Create function” button in the lower-right corner
Copy the following Python code and paste it in the Function code section.
import base64
import json
import logging
import os
import boto3
from botocore.vendored import requests
logger = logging.getLogger()
logger.setLevel(logging.INFO)
def lambda_handler(event, context):
"""Secrets Manager Twitter Bearer Token Handler
This handler uses the master-user rotation scheme to rotate a bearer token of a Twitter app.
The Secret PlaintextString is expected to be a JSON string with the following format:
{
'access_token': ,
'token_type': ,
'masterarn':
}
Args:
event (dict): Lambda dictionary of event parameters. These keys must include the following:
- SecretId: The secret ARN or identifier
- ClientRequestToken: The ClientRequestToken of the secret version
- Step: The rotation step (one of createSecret, setSecret, testSecret, or finishSecret)
context (LambdaContext): The Lambda runtime information
Raises:
ResourceNotFoundException: If the secret with the specified arn and stage does not exist
ValueError: If the secret is not properly configured for rotation
KeyError: If the secret json does not contain the expected keys
"""
arn = event['SecretId']
token = event['ClientRequestToken']
step = event['Step']
# Setup the client and environment variables
service_client = boto3.client('secretsmanager', endpoint_url=os.environ['SECRETS_MANAGER_ENDPOINT'])
oauth2_token_url = os.environ['TWITTER_OAUTH2_TOKEN_URL']
oauth2_invalid_token_url = os.environ['TWITTER_OAUTH2_INVALID_TOKEN_URL']
tweet_search_url = os.environ['TWITTER_SEARCH_URL']
# Make sure the version is staged correctly
metadata = service_client.describe_secret(SecretId=arn)
if not metadata['RotationEnabled']:
logger.error("Secret %s is not enabled for rotation" % arn)
raise ValueError("Secret %s is not enabled for rotation" % arn)
versions = metadata['VersionIdsToStages']
if token not in versions:
logger.error("Secret version %s has no stage for rotation of secret %s." % (token, arn))
raise ValueError("Secret version %s has no stage for rotation of secret %s." % (token, arn))
if "AWSCURRENT" in versions[token]:
logger.info("Secret version %s already set as AWSCURRENT for secret %s." % (token, arn))
return
elif "AWSPENDING" not in versions[token]:
logger.error("Secret version %s not set as AWSPENDING for rotation of secret %s." % (token, arn))
raise ValueError("Secret version %s not set as AWSPENDING for rotation of secret %s." % (token, arn))
# Call the appropriate step
if step == "createSecret":
create_secret(service_client, arn, token, oauth2_token_url, oauth2_invalid_token_url)
elif step == "setSecret":
set_secret(service_client, arn, token, oauth2_token_url)
elif step == "testSecret":
test_secret(service_client, arn, token, tweet_search_url)
elif step == "finishSecret":
finish_secret(service_client, arn, token)
else:
logger.error("lambda_handler: Invalid step parameter %s for secret %s" % (step, arn))
raise ValueError("Invalid step parameter %s for secret %s" % (step, arn))
def create_secret(service_client, arn, token, oauth2_token_url, oauth2_invalid_token_url):
"""Get a new bearer token from Twitter
This method invalidates existing bearer token for the Twitter app and retrieves a new one from Twitter.
If a secret version with AWSPENDING stage exists, updates it with the newly retrieved bearer token and if
the AWSPENDING stage does not exist, creates a new version of the secret with that stage label.
Args:
service_client (client): The secrets manager service client
arn (string): The secret ARN or other identifier
token (string): The ClientRequestToken associated with the secret version
oauth2_token_url (string): The Twitter API endpoint to request a bearer token
oauth2_invalid_token_url (string): The Twitter API endpoint to invalidate a bearer token
Raises:
ValueError: If the current secret is not valid JSON
KeyError: If the secret json does not contain the expected keys
ResourceNotFoundException: If the current secret is not found
"""
# Make sure the current secret exists and try to get the master arn from the secret
try:
current_secret_dict = get_secret_dict(service_client, arn, "AWSCURRENT")
master_arn = current_secret_dict['masterarn']
logger.info("createSecret: Successfully retrieved secret for %s." % arn)
except service_client.exceptions.ResourceNotFoundException:
return
# create bearer token credentials to be passed as authorization string to Twitter
bearer_token_credentials = encode_credentials(service_client, master_arn, "AWSCURRENT")
# get the bearer token from Twitter
bearer_token_from_twitter = get_bearer_token(bearer_token_credentials,oauth2_token_url)
# invalidate the current bearer token
invalidate_bearer_token(oauth2_invalid_token_url,bearer_token_credentials,bearer_token_from_twitter)
# get a new bearer token from Twitter
new_bearer_token = get_bearer_token(bearer_token_credentials, oauth2_token_url)
# if a secret version with AWSPENDING stage exists, update it with the lastest bearer token
# if the AWSPENDING stage does not exist, then create the version with AWSPENDING stage
try:
pending_secret_dict = get_secret_dict(service_client, arn, "AWSPENDING", token)
pending_secret_dict['access_token'] = new_bearer_token
service_client.put_secret_value(SecretId=arn, ClientRequestToken=token, SecretString=json.dumps(pending_secret_dict), VersionStages=['AWSPENDING'])
logger.info("createSecret: Successfully invalidated the bearer token of the secret %s and updated the pending version" % arn)
except service_client.exceptions.ResourceNotFoundException:
current_secret_dict['access_token'] = new_bearer_token
service_client.put_secret_value(SecretId=arn, ClientRequestToken=token, SecretString=json.dumps(current_secret_dict), VersionStages=['AWSPENDING'])
logger.info("createSecret: Successfully invalidated the bearer token of the secret %s and and created the pending version." % arn)
def set_secret(service_client, arn, token, oauth2_token_url):
"""Validate the pending secret with that in Twitter
This method checks wether the bearer token in Twitter is the same as the one in the version with AWSPENDING stage.
Args:
service_client (client): The secrets manager service client
arn (string): The secret ARN or other identifier
token (string): The ClientRequestToken associated with the secret version
oauth2_token_url (string): The Twitter API endopoint to get a bearer token
Raises:
ResourceNotFoundException: If the secret with the specified arn and stage does not exist
ValueError: If the secret is not valid JSON or master credentials could not be used to login to DB
KeyError: If the secret json does not contain the expected keys
"""
# First get the pending version of the bearer token and compare it with that in Twitter
pending_secret_dict = get_secret_dict(service_client, arn, "AWSPENDING")
master_arn = pending_secret_dict['masterarn']
# create bearer token credentials to be passed as authorization string to Twitter
bearer_token_credentials = encode_credentials(service_client, master_arn, "AWSCURRENT")
# get the bearer token from Twitter
bearer_token_from_twitter = get_bearer_token(bearer_token_credentials, oauth2_token_url)
# if the bearer tokens are same, invalidate the bearer token in Twitter
# if not, raise an exception that bearer token in Twitter was changed outside Secrets Manager
if pending_secret_dict['access_token'] == bearer_token_from_twitter:
logger.info("createSecret: Successfully verified the bearer token of arn %s" % arn)
else:
raise ValueError("The bearer token of the Twitter app was changed outside Secrets Manager. Please check.")
def test_secret(service_client, arn, token, tweet_search_url):
"""Test the pending secret by calling a Twitter API
This method tries to use the bearer token in the secret version with AWSPENDING stage and search for tweets
with 'aws secrets manager' string.
Args:
service_client (client): The secrets manager service client
arn (string): The secret ARN or other identifier
token (string): The ClientRequestToken associated with the secret version
Raises:
ResourceNotFoundException: If the secret with the specified arn and stage does not exist
ValueError: If the secret is not valid JSON or pending credentials could not be used to login to the database
KeyError: If the secret json does not contain the expected keys
"""
# First get the pending version of the bearer token and compare it with that in Twitter
pending_secret_dict = get_secret_dict(service_client, arn, "AWSPENDING", token)
# Now verify you can search for tweets using the bearer token
if verify_bearer_token(pending_secret_dict['access_token'], tweet_search_url):
logger.info("testSecret: Successfully authorized with the pending secret in %s." % arn)
return
else:
logger.error("testSecret: Unable to authorize with the pending secret of secret ARN %s" % arn)
raise ValueError("Unable to connect to Twitter with pending secret of secret ARN %s" % arn)
def finish_secret(service_client, arn, token):
"""Finish the rotation by marking the pending secret as current
This method moves the secret from the AWSPENDING stage to the AWSCURRENT stage.
Args:
service_client (client): The secrets manager service client
arn (string): The secret ARN or other identifier
token (string): The ClientRequestToken associated with the secret version
Raises:
ResourceNotFoundException: If the secret with the specified arn and stage does not exist
"""
# First describe the secret to get the current version
metadata = service_client.describe_secret(SecretId=arn)
current_version = None
for version in metadata["VersionIdsToStages"]:
if "AWSCURRENT" in metadata["VersionIdsToStages"][version]:
if version == token:
# The correct version is already marked as current, return
logger.info("finishSecret: Version %s already marked as AWSCURRENT for %s" % (version, arn))
return
current_version = version
break
# Finalize by staging the secret version current
service_client.update_secret_version_stage(SecretId=arn, VersionStage="AWSCURRENT", MoveToVersionId=token, RemoveFromVersionId=current_version)
logger.info("finishSecret: Successfully set AWSCURRENT stage to version %s for secret %s." % (version, arn))
def encode_credentials(service_client, arn, stage):
"""Encodes the Twitter credentials
This helper function encodes the Twitter credentials (consumer_key and consumer_secret)
Args:
service_client (client):The secrets manager service client
arn (string): The secret ARN or other identifier
stage (stage): The stage identifying the secret version
Returns:
encoded_credentials (string): base64 encoded authorization string for Twitter
Raises:
KeyError: If the secret json does not contain the expected keys
"""
required_fields = ['consumer_key','consumer_secret']
master_secret_dict = get_secret_dict(service_client, arn, stage)
for field in required_fields:
if field not in master_secret_dict:
raise KeyError("%s key is missing from the secret JSON" % field)
encoded_credentials = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
'{}:{}'.format(master_secret_dict['consumer_key'], master_secret_dict['consumer_secret']).encode('ascii')).decode('ascii')
return encoded_credentials
def get_bearer_token(encoded_credentials, oauth2_token_url):
"""Gets a bearer token from Twitter
This helper function retrieves the current bearer token from Twitter, given a set of credentials.
Args:
encoded_credentials (string): Twitter credentials for authentication
oauth2_token_url (string): REST API endpoint to request a bearer token from Twitter
Raises:
KeyError: If the secret json does not contain the expected keys
"""
headers = {
'Authorization': 'Basic {}'.format(encoded_credentials),
'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8',
}
data = 'grant_type=client_credentials'
response = requests.post(oauth2_token_url, headers=headers, data=data)
response_data = response.json()
if response_data['token_type'] == 'bearer':
bearer_token = response_data['access_token']
return bearer_token
else:
raise RuntimeError('unexpected token type: {}'.format(response_data['token_type']))
def invalidate_bearer_token(oauth2_invalid_token_url, bearer_token_credentials, bearer_token):
"""Invalidates a Bearer Token of a Twitter App
This helper function invalidates a bearer token of a Twitter app.
If successful, it returns the invalidated bearer token, else None
Args:
oauth2_invalid_token_url (string): The Twitter API endpoint to invalidate a bearer token
bearer_token_credentials (string): encoded consumer key and consumer secret to authenticate with Twitter
bearer_token (string): The bearer token to be invalidated
Returns:
invalidated_bearer_token: The invalidated bearer token
Raises:
ResourceNotFoundException: If the secret with the specified arn and stage does not exist
ValueError: If the secret is not valid JSON
KeyError: If the secret json does not contain the expected keys
"""
headers = {
'Authorization': 'Basic {}'.format(bearer_token_credentials),
'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8',
}
data = 'access_token=' + bearer_token
invalidate_response = requests.post(oauth2_invalid_token_url, headers=headers, data=data)
invalidate_response_data = invalidate_response.json()
if invalidate_response_data:
return
else:
raise RuntimeError('Invalidate bearer token request failed')
def verify_bearer_token(bearer_token, tweet_search_url):
"""Verifies access to Twitter APIs using a bearer token
This helper function verifies that the bearer token is valid by calling Twitter's search/tweets API endpoint
Args:
bearer_token (string): The current bearer token for the application
Returns:
True or False
Raises:
KeyError: If the response of search tweets API call fails
"""
headers = {
'Authorization' : 'Bearer {}'.format(bearer_token),
'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8',
}
search_results = requests.get(tweet_search_url, headers=headers)
try:
search_results.json()['statuses']
return True
except:
return False
def get_secret_dict(service_client, arn, stage, token=None):
"""Gets the secret dictionary corresponding for the secret arn, stage, and token
This helper function gets credentials for the arn and stage passed in and returns the dictionary by parsing the JSON string
Args:
service_client (client): The secrets manager service client
arn (string): The secret ARN or other identifier
token (string): The ClientRequestToken associated with the secret version, or None if no validation is desired
stage (string): The stage identifying the secret version
Returns:
SecretDictionary: Secret dictionary
Raises:
ResourceNotFoundException: If the secret with the specified arn and stage does not exist
ValueError: If the secret is not valid JSON
"""
# Only do VersionId validation against the stage if a token is passed in
if token:
secret = service_client.get_secret_value(SecretId=arn, VersionId=token, VersionStage=stage)
else:
secret = service_client.get_secret_value(SecretId=arn, VersionStage=stage)
plaintext = secret['SecretString']
# Parse and return the secret JSON string
return json.loads(plaintext)
Here’s what it will look like:
Figure 13: The Python code pasted in the “Function code” section
On the same page, provide the following environment variables:
Note: Resources used in this example are in US East (Ohio) region. If you intend to use another AWS Region, change the SECRETS_MANAGER_ENDPOINT set in the Environment variables to the appropriate region.
You’ve now created a Lambda function that can rotate the bearer token:
Figure 15: The new Lambda function
Before you can configure Secrets Manager to use this Lambda function, you need to update the function policy of the Lambda function. A function policy permits AWS services, such as Secrets Manager, to invoke a Lambda function on behalf of your application. You can attach a Lambda function policy from the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) or SDK. To attach a function policy, call the add-permission Lambda API from the AWS CLI.
Phase 3: Configure your application to retrieve the bearer token from Secrets Manager
Now that you’ve stored the bearer token in Secrets Manager, update the application to retrieve the bearer token from Secrets Manager instead of hard-coding this information in a configuration file or source code. For this example, I show you how to configure a Python application to retrieve this secret from Secrets Manager.
import config
def no_secrets_manager_sample()
# Get the bearer token from a config file.
Bearer_token = config.bearer_token
# Use the bearer token to authenticate requests to Twitter
Use the sample code from section titled Phase 1 and update the application to retrieve the bearer token from Secrets Manager. The following code sets up the client and retrieves and decrypts the secret Demo/Twitter_bearer_token.
# Use this code snippet in your app.
import boto3
from botocore.exceptions import ClientError
def get_secret():
secret_name = "Demo/Twitter_bearer_token"
endpoint_url = "https://secretsmanager.us-east-2.amazonaws.com"
region_name = "us-east-2"
session = boto3.session.Session()
client = session.client(
service_name='secretsmanager',
region_name=region_name,
endpoint_url=endpoint_url
)
try:
get_secret_value_response = client.get_secret_value(
SecretId=secret_name
)
except ClientError as e:
if e.response['Error']['Code'] == 'ResourceNotFoundException':
print("The requested secret " + secret_name + " was not found")
elif e.response['Error']['Code'] == 'InvalidRequestException':
print("The request was invalid due to:", e)
elif e.response['Error']['Code'] == 'InvalidParameterException':
print("The request had invalid params:", e)
else:
# Decrypted secret using the associated KMS CMK
# Depending on whether the secret was a string or binary, one of these fields will be populated
if 'SecretString' in get_secret_value_response:
secret = get_secret_value_response['SecretString']
else:
binary_secret_data = get_secret_value_response['SecretBinary']
# Your code goes here.
Applications require permissions to access Secrets Manager. My application runs on Amazon EC2 and uses an IAM role to get access to AWS services. I’ll attach the following policy to my IAM role, and you should take a similar action with your IAM role. This policy uses the GetSecretValue action to grant my application permissions to read secrets from Secrets Manager. This policy also uses the resource element to limit my application to read only the Demo/Twitter_bearer_token secret from Secrets Manager. Read the AWS Secrets Manager documentation to understand the minimum IAM permissions required to retrieve a secret.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": {
"Sid": "RetrieveBearerToken",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue",
"Resource": Input ARN of the secret Demo/Twitter_bearer_token here
}
}
Note: To improve the resiliency of your applications, associate your application with two API keys/bearer tokens. This is a higher availability option because you can continue to use one bearer token while Secrets Manager rotates the other token. Read the AWS documentation to learn how AWS Secrets Manager rotates your secrets.
Phase 4: Enable and verify rotation
Now that you’ve stored the secret in Secrets Manager and created a Lambda function to rotate this secret, configure Secrets Manager to rotate the secret Demo/Twitter_bearer_token.
From the Secrets Manager console, go to the list of secrets and choose the secret you created in the first step (in my example, this is named Demo/Twitter_bearer_token).
Scroll to Rotation configuration, and then select Edit rotation.
Figure 16: Select the “Edit rotation” button
To enable rotation, select Enable automatic rotation, and then choose how frequently you want Secrets Manager to rotate this secret. For this example, I set the rotation interval to 30 days. I also choose the rotation Lambda function, Lambda_Rotate_Bearer_Token, from the drop-down list.
Figure 17: “Edit rotation configuration” options
The banner on the next screen confirms that I have successfully configured rotation and the first rotation is in progress, which enables you to verify that rotation is functioning as expected. Secrets Manager will rotate this credential automatically every 30 days.
Figure 18: Confirmation notice
Summary
In this post, I showed you how to configure Secrets Manager to manage and rotate an API key and bearer token used by applications to authenticate and retrieve information from Twitter. You can use the steps described in this blog to manage and rotate other API keys, as well.
Secrets Manager helps you protect access to your applications, services, and IT resources without the upfront investment and on-going maintenance costs of operating your own secrets management infrastructure. To get started, open the Secrets Manager console. To learn more, read the Secrets Manager documentation.
If you have comments about this post, submit them in the Comments section below. If you have questions about anything in this post, start a new thread on the Secrets Manager forum or contact AWS Support.
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.
Today I’m excited to announce built-in authentication support in Application Load Balancers (ALB). ALB can now securely authenticate users as they access applications, letting developers eliminate the code they have to write to support authentication and offload the responsibility of authentication from the backend. The team built a great live example where you can try out the authentication functionality.
Identity-based security is a crucial component of modern applications and as customers continue to move mission critical applications into the cloud, developers are asked to write the same authentication code again and again. Enterprises want to use their on-premises identities with their cloud applications. Web developers want to use federated identities from social networks to allow their users to sign-in. ALB’s new authentication action provides authentication through social Identity Providers (IdP) like Google, Facebook, and Amazon through Amazon Cognito. It also natively integrates with any OpenID Connect protocol compliant IdP, providing secure authentication and a single sign-on experience across your applications.
How Does ALB Authentication Work?
Authentication is a complicated topic and our readers may have differing levels of expertise with it. I want to cover a few key concepts to make sure we’re all on the same page. If you’re already an authentication expert and you just want to see how ALB authentication works feel free to skip to the next section!
Authentication verifies identity.
Authorization verifies permissions, the things an identity is allowed to do.
OpenID Connect (OIDC) is a simple identity, or authentication, layer built on top on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. The OIDC specification document is pretty well written and worth a casual read.
Identity Providers (IdPs) manage identity information and provide authentication services. ALB supports any OIDC compliant IdP and you can use a service like Amazon Cognito or Auth0 to aggregate different identities from various IdPs like Active Directory, LDAP, Google, Facebook, Amazon, or others deployed in AWS or on premises.
When we get away from the terminology for a bit, all of this boils down to figuring out who a user is and what they’re allowed to do. Doing this securely and efficiently is hard. Traditionally, enterprises have used a protocol called SAML with their IdPs, to provide a single sign-on (SSO) experience for their internal users. SAML is XML heavy and modern applications have started using OIDC with JSON mechanism to share claims. Developers can use SAML in ALB with Amazon Cognito’s SAML support. Web app or mobile developers typically use federated identities via social IdPs like Facebook, Amazon, or Google which, conveniently, are also supported by Amazon Cognito.
ALB Authentication works by defining an authentication action in a listener rule. The ALB’s authentication action will check if a session cookie exists on incoming requests, then check that it’s valid. If the session cookie is set and valid then the ALB will route the request to the target group with X-AMZN-OIDC-* headers set. The headers contain identity information in JSON Web Token (JWT) format, that a backend can use to identify a user. If the session cookie is not set or invalid then ALB will follow the OIDC protocol and issue an HTTP 302 redirect to the identity provider. The protocol is a lot to unpack and is covered more thoroughly in the documentation for those curious.
ALB Authentication Walkthrough
I have a simple Python flask app in an Amazon ECS cluster running in some AWS Fargate containers. The containers are in a target group routed to by an ALB. I want to make sure users of my application are logged in before accessing the authenticated portions of my application. First, I’ll navigate to the ALB in the console and edit the rules.
I want to make sure all access to /account* endpoints is authenticated so I’ll add new rule with a condition to match those endpoints.
Now, I’ll add a new rule and create an Authenticate action in that rule.
I’ll have ALB create a new Amazon Cognito user pool for me by providing some configuration details.
After creating the Amazon Cognito pool, I can make some additional configuration in the advanced settings.
I can change the default cookie name, adjust the timeout, adjust the scope, and choose the action for unauthenticated requests.
I can pick Deny to serve a 401 for all unauthenticated requests or I can pick Allow which will pass through to the application if unauthenticated. This is useful for Single Page Apps (SPAs). For now, I’ll choose Authenticate, which will prompt the IdP, in this case Amazon Cognito, to authenticate the user and reload the existing page.
Now I’ll add a forwarding action for my target group and save the rule.
Over on the Facebook side I just need to add my Amazon Cognito User Pool Domain to the whitelisted OAuth redirect URLs.
I would follow similar steps for other authentication providers.
Now, when I navigate to an authenticated page my Fargate containers receive the originating request with the X-Amzn-Oidc-* headers set by ALB. Using the information in those headers (claims-data, identity, access-token) my application can implement authorization.
All of this was possible without having to write a single line of code to deal with each of the IdPs. However, it’s still important for the implementing applications to verify the signature on the JWT header to ensure the request hasn’t been tampered with.
Additional Resources
Of course everything we’ve seen today is also available in the the API and AWS Command Line Interface (CLI). You can find additional information on the feature in the documentation. This feature is provided at no additional charge.
With authentication built-in to ALB, developers can focus on building their applications instead of rebuilding authentication for every application, all the while maintaining the scale, availability, and reliability of ALB. I think this feature is a pretty big deal and I can’t wait to see what customers build with it. Let us know what you think of this feature in the comments or on twitter!
This post is courtesy of Otavio Ferreira, Manager, Amazon SNS, AWS Messaging.
Amazon SNS message filtering provides a set of string and numeric matching operators that allow each subscription to receive only the messages of interest. Hence, SNS message filtering can simplify your pub/sub messaging architecture by offloading the message filtering logic from your subscriber systems, as well as the message routing logic from your publisher systems.
After you set the subscription attribute that defines a filter policy, the subscribing endpoint receives only the messages that carry attributes matching this filter policy. Other messages published to the topic are filtered out for this subscription. In this way, the native integration between SNS and Amazon CloudWatch provides visibility into the number of messages delivered, as well as the number of messages filtered out.
CloudWatch metrics are captured automatically for you. To get started with SNS message filtering, see Filtering Messages with Amazon SNS.
Message Filtering Metrics
The following six CloudWatch metrics are relevant to understanding your SNS message filtering activity:
NumberOfMessagesPublished – Inbound traffic to SNS. This metric tracks all the messages that have been published to the topic.
NumberOfNotificationsDelivered – Outbound traffic from SNS. This metric tracks all the messages that have been successfully delivered to endpoints subscribed to the topic. A delivery takes place either when the incoming message attributes match a subscription filter policy, or when the subscription has no filter policy at all, which results in a catch-all behavior.
NumberOfNotificationsFilteredOut – This metric tracks all the messages that were filtered out because they carried attributes that didn’t match the subscription filter policy.
NumberOfNotificationsFilteredOut-NoMessageAttributes – This metric tracks all the messages that were filtered out because they didn’t carry any attributes at all and, consequently, didn’t match the subscription filter policy.
NumberOfNotificationsFilteredOut-InvalidAttributes – This metric keeps track of messages that were filtered out because they carried invalid or malformed attributes and, thus, didn’t match the subscription filter policy.
NumberOfNotificationsFailed – This last metric tracks all the messages that failed to be delivered to subscribing endpoints, regardless of whether a filter policy had been set for the endpoint. This metric is emitted after the message delivery retry policy is exhausted, and SNS stops attempting to deliver the message. At that moment, the subscribing endpoint is likely no longer reachable. For example, the subscribing SQS queue or Lambda function has been deleted by its owner. You may want to closely monitor this metric to address message delivery issues quickly.
Message filtering graphs
Through the AWS Management Console, you can compose graphs to display your SNS message filtering activity. The graph shows the number of messages published, delivered, and filtered out within the timeframe you specify (1h, 3h, 12h, 1d, 3d, 1w, or custom).
To compose an SNS message filtering graph with CloudWatch:
Open the CloudWatch console.
Choose Metrics, SNS, All Metrics, and Topic Metrics.
Select all metrics to add to the graph, such as:
NumberOfMessagesPublished
NumberOfNotificationsDelivered
NumberOfNotificationsFilteredOut
Choose Graphed metrics.
In the Statistic column, switch from Average to Sum.
Title your graph with a descriptive name, such as “SNS Message Filtering”
After you have your graph set up, you may want to copy the graph link for bookmarking, emailing, or sharing with co-workers. You may also want to add your graph to a CloudWatch dashboard for easy access in the future. Both actions are available to you on the Actions menu, which is found above the graph.
Summary
SNS message filtering defines how SNS topics behave in terms of message delivery. By using CloudWatch metrics, you gain visibility into the number of messages published, delivered, and filtered out. This enables you to validate the operation of filter policies and more easily troubleshoot during development phases.
SNS message filtering can be implemented easily with existing AWS SDKs by applying message and subscription attributes across all SNS supported protocols (Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda, HTTP, SMS, email, and mobile push). CloudWatch metrics for SNS message filtering is available now, in all AWS Regions.
Python code creates curious, wordless comic strips at random, spewing them from the thermal printer mouth of a laser-cut body reminiscent of Disney Pixar’s WALL-E: meet the Vomit Comic Robot!
The age of the thermal printer!
Thermal printers allow you to instantly print photos, data, and text using a few lines of code, with no need for ink. More and more makers are using this handy, low-maintenance bit of kit for truly creative projects, from Pierre Muth’s tiny PolaPi-Zero camera to the sound-printing Waves project by Eunice Lee, Matthew Zhang, and Bomani McClendon (and our own Secret Santa Babbage).
Vomiting robots
Interaction designer and developer Cadin Batrack, whose background is in game design and interactivity, has built the Vomit Comic Robot, which creates “one-of-a-kind comics on demand by processing hand-drawn images through a custom software algorithm.”
The robot is made up of a Raspberry Pi 3, a USB thermal printer, and a handful of LEDs.
At the press of a button, Processing code selects one of a set of Cadin’s hand-drawn empty comic grids and then randomly picks images from a library to fill in the gaps.
Each image is associated with data that allows the code to fit it correctly into the available panels. Cadin says about the concept behing his build:
Although images are selected and placed randomly, the comic panel format suggests relationships between elements. Our minds create a story where there is none in an attempt to explain visuals created by a non-intelligent machine.
The Raspberry Pi saves the final image as a high-resolution PNG file (so that Cadin can sell prints on thick paper via Etsy), and a Python script sends it to be vomited up by the thermal printer.
For more about the Vomit Comic Robot, check out Cadin’s blog. If you want to recreate it, you can find the info you need in the Imgur album he has put together.
We cute robots
We have a soft spot for cute robots here at Pi Towers, and of course we make no exception for the Vomit Comic Robot. If, like us, you’re a fan of adorable bots, check out Mira, the tiny interactive robot by Alonso Martinez, and Peeqo, the GIF bot by Abhishek Singh.
This post is courtesy of Alan Protasio, Software Development Engineer, Amazon Web Services
Just like compute and storage, messaging is a fundamental building block of enterprise applications. Message brokers (aka “message-oriented middleware”) enable different software systems, often written in different languages, on different platforms, running in different locations, to communicate and exchange information. Mission-critical applications, such as CRM and ERP, rely on message brokers to work.
A common performance consideration for customers deploying a message broker in a production environment is the throughput of the system, measured as messages per second. This is important to know so that application environments (hosts, threads, memory, etc.) can be configured correctly.
In this post, we demonstrate how to measure the throughput for Amazon MQ, a new managed message broker service for ActiveMQ, using JMS Benchmark. It should take between 15–20 minutes to set up the environment and an hour to run the benchmark. We also provide some tips on how to configure Amazon MQ for optimal throughput.
Benchmarking throughput for Amazon MQ
ActiveMQ can be used for a number of use cases. These use cases can range from simple fire and forget tasks (that is, asynchronous processing), low-latency request-reply patterns, to buffering requests before they are persisted to a database.
The throughput of Amazon MQ is largely dependent on the use case. For example, if you have non-critical workloads such as gathering click events for a non-business-critical portal, you can use ActiveMQ in a non-persistent mode and get extremely high throughput with Amazon MQ.
On the flip side, if you have a critical workload where durability is extremely important (meaning that you can’t lose a message), then you are bound by the I/O capacity of your underlying persistence store. We recommend using mq.m4.large for the best results. The mq.t2.micro instance type is intended for product evaluation. Performance is limited, due to the lower memory and burstable CPU performance.
Tip: To improve your throughput with Amazon MQ, make sure that you have consumers processing messaging as fast as (or faster than) your producers are pushing messages.
Because it’s impossible to talk about how the broker (ActiveMQ) behaves for each and every use case, we walk through how to set up your own benchmark for Amazon MQ using our favorite open-source benchmarking tool: JMS Benchmark. We are fans of the JMS Benchmark suite because it’s easy to set up and deploy, and comes with a built-in visualizer of the results.
Non-Persistent Scenarios – Queue latency as you scale producer throughput
Getting started
At the time of publication, you can create an mq.m4.large single-instance broker for testing for $0.30 per hour (US pricing).
Step 2 – Create an EC2 instance to run your benchmark Launch the EC2 instance using Step 1: Launch an Instance. We recommend choosing the m5.large instance type.
Step 3 – Configure the security groups Make sure that all the security groups are correctly configured to let the traffic flow between the EC2 instance and your broker.
From the broker list, choose the name of your broker (for example, MyBroker)
In the Details section, under Security and network, choose the name of your security group or choose the expand icon ( ).
From the security group list, choose your security group.
At the bottom of the page, choose Inbound, Edit.
In the Edit inbound rules dialog box, add a role to allow traffic between your instance and the broker: • Choose Add Rule. • For Type, choose Custom TCP. • For Port Range, type the ActiveMQ SSL port (61617). • For Source, leave Custom selected and then type the security group of your EC2 instance. • Choose Save.
Your broker can now accept the connection from your EC2 instance.
Step 4 – Run the benchmark Connect to your EC2 instance using SSH and run the following commands:
After the benchmark finishes, you can find the results in the ~/reports directory. As you may notice, the performance of ActiveMQ varies based on the number of consumers, producers, destinations, and message size.
Amazon MQ architecture
The last bit that’s important to know so that you can better understand the results of the benchmark is how Amazon MQ is architected.
Amazon MQ is architected to be highly available (HA) and durable. For HA, we recommend using the multi-AZ option. After a message is sent to Amazon MQ in persistent mode, the message is written to the highly durable message store that replicates the data across multiple nodes in multiple Availability Zones. Because of this replication, for some use cases you may see a reduction in throughput as you migrate to Amazon MQ. Customers have told us they appreciate the benefits of message replication as it helps protect durability even in the face of the loss of an Availability Zone.
Conclusion
We hope this gives you an idea of how Amazon MQ performs. We encourage you to run tests to simulate your own use cases.
To learn more, see the Amazon MQ website. You can try Amazon MQ for free with the AWS Free Tier, which includes up to 750 hours of a single-instance mq.t2.micro broker and up to 1 GB of storage per month for one year.
Ново развитие в ревизията на авторското право в ЕС – става ясно от съобщенията на българското председателство, участници в ревизията и Юлия Реда – защото тя имаше много ясен възглед какво иска да се промени в правната рамка (общ режим на изключенията, актуализиране – за да имаме правна рамка, адекватна на технологичното развитие) – и сега следи ангажирано законодателния процес.
Правителствата на държавите от ЕС са приели позиция относно реформата на авторските права без съществени промени по чл.11 (новото право за издателите) и чл.13 (филтрите на входа), проектът е на сайта на Реда, Politico дава измененията, засягащи правото на издателите, в цвят.
Сега имате шанса да окажете влияние – шанс, който ще изчезне след две години, когато всички “изведнъж” ще се сблъскат с предизвикателството да се внедряват филтри и link tax. Експертите почти единодушно се съгласяват, че проектът за реформата на авторското право е наистина лош.
The adoption of Apache Spark has increased significantly over the past few years, and running Spark-based application pipelines is the new normal. Spark jobs that are in an ETL (extract, transform, and load) pipeline have different requirements—you must handle dependencies in the jobs, maintain order during executions, and run multiple jobs in parallel. In most of these cases, you can use workflow scheduler tools like Apache Oozie, Apache Airflow, and even Cron to fulfill these requirements.
Apache Oozie is a widely used workflow scheduler system for Hadoop-based jobs. However, its limited UI capabilities, lack of integration with other services, and heavy XML dependency might not be suitable for some users. On the other hand, Apache Airflow comes with a lot of neat features, along with powerful UI and monitoring capabilities and integration with several AWS and third-party services. However, with Airflow, you do need to provision and manage the Airflow server. The Cron utility is a powerful job scheduler. But it doesn’t give you much visibility into the job details, and creating a workflow using Cron jobs can be challenging.
What if you have a simple use case, in which you want to run a few Spark jobs in a specific order, but you don’t want to spend time orchestrating those jobs or maintaining a separate application? You can do that today in a serverless fashion using AWS Step Functions. You can create the entire workflow in AWS Step Functions and interact with Spark on Amazon EMR through Apache Livy.
In this post, I walk you through a list of steps to orchestrate a serverless Spark-based ETL pipeline using AWS Step Functions and Apache Livy.
Input data
For the source data for this post, I use the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) trip record data. For a description of the data, see this detailed dictionary of the taxi data. In this example, we’ll work mainly with the following three columns for the Spark jobs.
Column name
Column description
RateCodeID
Represents the rate code in effect at the end of the trip (for example, 1 for standard rate, 2 for JFK airport, 3 for Newark airport, and so on).
FareAmount
Represents the time-and-distance fare calculated by the meter.
TripDistance
Represents the elapsed trip distance in miles reported by the taxi meter.
The trip data is in comma-separated values (CSV) format with the first row as a header. To shorten the Spark execution time, I trimmed the large input data to only 20,000 rows. During the deployment phase, the input file tripdata.csv is stored in Amazon S3 in the <<your-bucket>>/emr-step-functions/input/ folder.
The following image shows a sample of the trip data:
Solution overview
The next few sections describe how Spark jobs are created for this solution, how you can interact with Spark using Apache Livy, and how you can use AWS Step Functions to create orchestrations for these Spark applications.
At a high level, the solution includes the following steps:
Trigger the AWS Step Function state machine by passing the input file path.
The first stage in the state machine triggers an AWS Lambda
The Lambda function interacts with Apache Spark running on Amazon EMR using Apache Livy, and submits a Spark job.
The state machine waits a few seconds before checking the Spark job status.
Based on the job status, the state machine moves to the success or failure state.
Subsequent Spark jobs are submitted using the same approach.
The state machine waits a few seconds for the job to finish.
The job finishes, and the state machine updates with its final status.
Let’s take a look at the Spark application that is used for this solution.
Spark jobs
For this example, I built a Spark jar named spark-taxi.jar. It has two different Spark applications:
MilesPerRateCode – The first job that runs on the Amazon EMR cluster. This job reads the trip data from an input source and computes the total trip distance for each rate code. The output of this job consists of two columns and is stored in Apache Parquet format in the output path.
The following are the expected output columns:
rate_code – Represents the rate code for the trip.
total_distance – Represents the total trip distance for that rate code (for example, sum(trip_distance)).
RateCodeStatus – The second job that runs on the EMR cluster, but only if the first job finishes successfully. This job depends on two different input sets:
csv – The same trip data that is used for the first Spark job.
miles-per-rate – The output of the first job.
This job first reads the tripdata.csv file and aggregates the fare_amount by the rate_code. After this point, you have two different datasets, both aggregated by rate_code. Finally, the job uses the rate_code field to join two datasets and output the entire rate code status in a single CSV file.
The output columns are as follows:
rate_code_id – Represents the rate code type.
total_distance – Derived from first Spark job and represents the total trip distance.
total_fare_amount – A new field that is generated during the second Spark application, representing the total fare amount by the rate code type.
Note that in this case, you don’t need to run two different Spark jobs to generate that output. The goal of setting up the jobs in this way is just to create a dependency between the two jobs and use them within AWS Step Functions.
Both Spark applications take one input argument called rootPath. It’s the S3 location where the Spark job is stored along with input and output data. Here is a sample of the final output:
The next section discusses how you can use Apache Livy to interact with Spark applications that are running on Amazon EMR.
Using Apache Livy to interact with Apache Spark
Apache Livy provides a REST interface to interact with Spark running on an EMR cluster. Livy is included in Amazon EMR release version 5.9.0 and later. In this post, I use Livy to submit Spark jobs and retrieve job status. When Amazon EMR is launched with Livy installed, the EMR master node becomes the endpoint for Livy, and it starts listening on port 8998 by default. Livy provides APIs to interact with Spark.
Let’s look at a couple of examples how you can interact with Spark running on Amazon EMR using Livy.
To list active running jobs, you can execute the following from the EMR master node:
curl localhost:8998/sessions
If you want to do the same from a remote instance, just change localhost to the EMR hostname, as in the following (port 8998 must be open to that remote instance through the security group):
Through Spark submit, you can pass multiple arguments for the Spark job and Spark configuration settings. You can also do that using Livy, by passing the S3 path through the args parameter, as shown following:
curl -X POST – data '{"file": "s3://<<bucket-location>>/spark.jar", "className": "com.example.SparkApp", “args”: [“s3://bucket-path”]}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" http://ec2-xx-xx-xx-xx.compute-1.amazonaws.com:8998/batches
All Apache Livy REST calls return a response as JSON, as shown in the following image:
If you want to pretty-print that JSON response, you can pipe command with Python’s JSON tool as follows:
For a detailed list of Livy APIs, see the Apache Livy REST API page. This post uses GET /batches and POST /batches.
In the next section, you create a state machine and orchestrate Spark applications using AWS Step Functions.
Using AWS Step Functions to create a Spark job workflow
AWS Step Functions automatically triggers and tracks each step and retries when it encounters errors. So your application executes in order and as expected every time. To create a Spark job workflow using AWS Step Functions, you first create a Lambda state machine using different types of states to create the entire workflow.
First, you use the Task state—a simple state in AWS Step Functions that performs a single unit of work. You also use the Wait state to delay the state machine from continuing for a specified time. Later, you use the Choice state to add branching logic to a state machine.
The following is a quick summary of how to use different states in the state machine to create the Spark ETL pipeline:
Task state – Invokes a Lambda function. The first Task state submits the Spark job on Amazon EMR, and the next Task state is used to retrieve the previous Spark job status.
Wait state – Pauses the state machine until a job completes execution.
Choice state – Each Spark job execution can return a failure, an error, or a success state So, in the state machine, you use the Choice state to create a rule that specifies the next action or step based on the success or failure of the previous step.
Here is one of my Task states, MilesPerRateCode, which simply submits a Spark job:
"MilesPerRate Job": {
"Type": "Task",
"Resource":"arn:aws:lambda:us-east-1:xxxxxx:function:blog-miles-per-rate-job-submit-function",
"ResultPath": "$.jobId",
"Next": "Wait for MilesPerRate job to complete"
}
This Task state configuration specifies the Lambda function to execute. Inside the Lambda function, it submits a Spark job through Livy using Livy’s POST API. Using ResultPath, it tells the state machine where to place the result of the executing task. As discussed in the previous section, Spark submit returns the session ID, which is captured with $.jobId and used in a later state.
The following code section shows the Lambda function, which is used to submit the MilesPerRateCode job. It uses the Python request library to submit a POST against the Livy endpoint hosted on Amazon EMR and passes the required parameters in JSON format through payload. It then parses the response, grabs id from the response, and returns it. The Next field tells the state machine which state to go to next.
Just like in the MilesPerRate job, another state submits the RateCodeStatus job, but it executes only when all previous jobs have completed successfully.
Here is the Task state in the state machine that checks the Spark job status:
Just like other states, the preceding Task executes a Lambda function, captures the result (represented by jobStatus), and passes it to the next state. The following is the Lambda function that checks the Spark job status based on a given session ID:
In the Choice state, it checks the Spark job status value, compares it with a predefined state status, and transitions the state based on the result. For example, if the status is success, move to the next state (RateCodeJobStatus job), and if it is dead, move to the MilesPerRate job failed state.
To set up this entire solution, you need to create a few AWS resources. To make it easier, I have created an AWS CloudFormation template. This template creates all the required AWS resources and configures all the resources that are needed to create a Spark-based ETL pipeline on AWS Step Functions.
This CloudFormation template requires you to pass the following four parameters during initiation.
Parameter
Description
ClusterSubnetID
The subnet where the Amazon EMR cluster is deployed and Lambda is configured to talk to this subnet.
KeyName
The name of the existing EC2 key pair to access the Amazon EMR cluster.
VPCID
The ID of the virtual private cloud (VPC) where the EMR cluster is deployed and Lambda is configured to talk to this VPC.
S3RootPath
The Amazon S3 path where all required files (input file, Spark job, and so on) are stored and the resulting data is written.
IMPORTANT: These templates are designed only to show how you can create a Spark-based ETL pipeline on AWS Step Functions using Apache Livy. They are not intended for production use without modification. And if you try this solution outside of the us-east-1 Region, download the necessary files from s3://aws-data-analytics-blog/emr-step-functions, upload the files to the buckets in your Region, edit the script as appropriate, and then run it.
To launch the CloudFormation stack, choose Launch Stack:
Launching this stack creates the following list of AWS resources.
Logical ID
Resource Type
Description
StepFunctionsStateExecutionRole
IAM role
IAM role to execute the state machine and have a trust relationship with the states service.
SparkETLStateMachine
AWS Step Functions state machine
State machine in AWS Step Functions for the Spark ETL workflow.
LambdaSecurityGroup
Amazon EC2 security group
Security group that is used for the Lambda function to call the Livy API.
RateCodeStatusJobSubmitFunction
AWS Lambda function
Lambda function to submit the RateCodeStatus job.
MilesPerRateJobSubmitFunction
AWS Lambda function
Lambda function to submit the MilesPerRate job.
SparkJobStatusFunction
AWS Lambda function
Lambda function to check the Spark job status.
LambdaStateMachineRole
IAM role
IAM role for all Lambda functions to use the lambda trust relationship.
EMRCluster
Amazon EMR cluster
EMR cluster where Livy is running and where the job is placed.
During the AWS CloudFormation deployment phase, it sets up S3 paths for input and output. Input files are stored in the <<s3-root-path>>/emr-step-functions/input/ path, whereas spark-taxi.jar is copied under <<s3-root-path>>/emr-step-functions/.
The following screenshot shows how the S3 paths are configured after deployment. In this example, I passed a bucket that I created in the AWS account s3://tm-app-demos for the S3 root path.
If the CloudFormation template completed successfully, you will see Spark-ETL-State-Machine in the AWS Step Functions dashboard, as follows:
Choose the Spark-ETL-State-Machine state machine to take a look at this implementation. The AWS CloudFormation template built the entire state machine along with its dependent Lambda functions, which are now ready to be executed.
On the dashboard, choose the newly created state machine, and then choose New execution to initiate the state machine. It asks you to pass input in JSON format. This input goes to the first state MilesPerRate Job, which eventually executes the Lambda function blog-miles-per-rate-job-submit-function.
Pass the S3 root path as input:
{
“rootPath”: “s3://tm-app-demos”
}
Then choose Start Execution:
The rootPath value is the same value that was passed when creating the CloudFormation stack. It can be an S3 bucket location or a bucket with prefixes, but it should be the same value that is used for AWS CloudFormation. This value tells the state machine where it can find the Spark jar and input file, and where it will write output files. After the state machine starts, each state/task is executed based on its definition in the state machine.
At a high level, the following represents the flow of events:
Execute the first Spark job, MilesPerRate.
The Spark job reads the input file from the location <<rootPath>>/emr-step-functions/input/tripdata.csv. If the job finishes successfully, it writes the output data to <<rootPath>>/emr-step-functions/miles-per-rate.
If the Spark job fails, it transitions to the error state MilesPerRate job failed, and the state machine stops. If the Spark job finishes successfully, it transitions to the RateCodeStatus Job state, and the second Spark job is executed.
If the second Spark job fails, it transitions to the error state RateCodeStatus job failed, and the state machine stops with the Failed status.
If this Spark job completes successfully, it writes the final output data to the <<rootPath>>/emr-step-functions/rate-code-status/ It also transitions the RateCodeStatus job finished state, and the state machine ends its execution with the Success status.
This following screenshot shows a successfully completed Spark ETL state machine:
The right side of the state machine diagram shows the details of individual states with their input and output.
When you execute the state machine for the second time, it fails because the S3 path already exists. The state machine turns red and stops at MilePerRate job failed. The following image represents that failed execution of the state machine:
You can also check your Spark application status and logs by going to the Amazon EMR console and viewing the Application history tab:
I hope this walkthrough paints a picture of how you can create a serverless solution for orchestrating Spark jobs on Amazon EMR using AWS Step Functions and Apache Livy. In the next section, I share some ideas for making this solution even more elegant.
Next steps
The goal of this post is to show a simple example that uses AWS Step Functions to create an orchestration for Spark-based jobs in a serverless fashion. To make this solution robust and production ready, you can explore the following options:
In this example, I manually initiated the state machine by passing the rootPath as input. You can instead trigger the state machine automatically. To run the ETL pipeline as soon as the files arrive in your S3 bucket, you can pass the new file path to the state machine. Because CloudWatch Events supports AWS Step Functions as a target, you can create a CloudWatch rule for an S3 event. You can then set AWS Step Functions as a target and pass the new file path to your state machine. You’re all set!
You can also improve this solution by adding an alerting mechanism in case of failures. To do this, create a Lambda function that sends an alert email and assigns that Lambda function to a Fail That way, when any part of your state fails, it triggers an email and notifies the user.
If you want to submit multiple Spark jobs in parallel, you can use the Parallel state type in AWS Step Functions. The Parallel state is used to create parallel branches of execution in your state machine.
With Lambda and AWS Step Functions, you can create a very robust serverless orchestration for your big data workload.
Cleaning up
When you’ve finished testing this solution, remember to clean up all those AWS resources that you created using AWS CloudFormation. Use the AWS CloudFormation console or AWS CLI to delete the stack named Blog-Spark-ETL-Step-Functions.
Summary
In this post, I showed you how to use AWS Step Functions to orchestrate your Spark jobs that are running on Amazon EMR. You used Apache Livy to submit jobs to Spark from a Lambda function and created a workflow for your Spark jobs, maintaining a specific order for job execution and triggering different AWS events based on your job’s outcome. Go ahead—give this solution a try, and share your experience with us!
Tanzir Musabbir is an EMR Specialist Solutions Architect with AWS. He is an early adopter of open source Big Data technologies. At AWS, he works with our customers to provide them architectural guidance for running analytics solutions on Amazon EMR, Amazon Athena & AWS Glue. Tanzir is a big Real Madrid fan and he loves to travel in his free time.
Thanks to Greg Eppel, Sr. Solutions Architect, Microsoft Platform for this great blog that describes how to create a custom CodeBuild build environment for the .NET Framework. — AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. CodeBuild provides curated build environments for programming languages and runtimes such as Android, Go, Java, Node.js, PHP, Python, Ruby, and Docker. CodeBuild now supports builds for the Microsoft Windows Server platform, including a prepackaged build environment for .NET Core on Windows. If your application uses the .NET Framework, you will need to use a custom Docker image to create a custom build environment that includes the Microsoft proprietary Framework Class Libraries. For information about why this step is required, see our FAQs. In this post, I’ll show you how to create a custom build environment for .NET Framework applications and walk you through the steps to configure CodeBuild to use this environment.
Build environments are Docker images that include a complete file system with everything required to build and test your project. To use a custom build environment in a CodeBuild project, you build a container image for your platform that contains your build tools, push it to a Docker container registry such as Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR), and reference it in the project configuration. When it builds your application, CodeBuild retrieves the Docker image from the container registry specified in the project configuration and uses the environment to compile your source code, run your tests, and package your application.
Step 1: Launch EC2 Windows Server 2016 with Containers
In the Amazon EC2 console, in your region, launch an Amazon EC2 instance from a Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Base with Containers AMI.
Increase disk space on the boot volume to at least 50 GB to account for the larger size of containers required to install and run Visual Studio Build Tools.
Run the following command in that directory. This process can take a while. It depends on the size of EC2 instance you launched. In my tests, a t2.2xlarge takes less than 30 minutes to build the image and produces an approximately 15 GB image.
docker build -t buildtools2017:latest -m 2GB .
Run the following command to test the container and start a command shell with all the developer environment variables:
docker run -it buildtools2017
Create a repository in the Amazon ECS console. For the repository name, type buildtools2017. Choose Next step and then complete the remaining steps.
Execute the following command to generate authentication details for our registry to the local Docker engine. Make sure you have permissions to the Amazon ECR registry before you execute the command.
aws ecr get-login
In the same command prompt window, copy and paste the following commands:
In the CodeCommit console, create a repository named DotNetFrameworkSampleApp. On the Configure email notifications page, choose Skip.
Clone a .NET Framework Docker sample application from GitHub. The repository includes a sample ASP.NET Framework that we’ll use to demonstrate our custom build environment.On the EC2 instance, open a command prompt and execute the following commands:
Navigate to the CodeCommit repository and confirm that the files you just pushed are there.
Step 4: Configure build spec
To build your .NET Framework application with CodeBuild you use a build spec, which is a collection of build commands and related settings, in YAML format, that AWS CodeBuild can use to run a build. You can include a build spec as part of the source code or you can define a build spec when you create a build project. In this example, I include a build spec as part of the source code.
In the root directory of your source directory, create a YAML file named buildspec.yml.
At this point, we have a Docker image with Visual Studio Build Tools installed and stored in the Amazon ECR registry. We also have a sample ASP.NET Framework application in a CodeCommit repository. Now we are going to set up CodeBuild to build the ASP.NET Framework application.
In the Amazon ECR console, choose the repository that was pushed earlier with the docker push command. On the Permissions tab, choose Add.
For Source Provider, choose AWS CodeCommit and then choose the called DotNetFrameworkSampleApp repository.
For Environment Image, choose Specify a Docker image.
For Environment type, choose Windows.
For Custom image type, choose Amazon ECR.
For Amazon ECR repository, choose the Docker image with the Visual Studio Build Tools installed, buildtools2017. Your configuration should look like the image below:
Choose Continue and then Save and Build to create your CodeBuild project and start your first build. You can monitor the status of the build in the console. You can also configure notifications that will notify subscribers whenever builds succeed, fail, go from one phase to another, or any combination of these events.
Summary
CodeBuild supports a number of platforms and languages out of the box. By using custom build environments, it can be extended to other runtimes. In this post, I showed you how to build a .NET Framework environment on a Windows container and demonstrated how to use it to build .NET Framework applications in CodeBuild.
We’re excited to see how customers extend and use CodeBuild to enable continuous integration and continuous delivery for their Windows applications. Feel free to share what you’ve learned extending CodeBuild for your own projects. Just leave questions or suggestions in the comments.
This post courtesy of Thiago Morais, AWS Solutions Architect
When you build web applications or expose any data externally, you probably look for a platform where you can build highly scalable, secure, and robust REST APIs. As APIs are publicly exposed, there are a number of best practices for providing a secure mechanism to consumers using your API.
Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.
In this post, I show you how to take advantage of the regional API endpoint feature in API Gateway, so that you can create your own Amazon CloudFront distribution and secure your API using AWS WAF.
AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.
As you make your APIs publicly available, you are exposed to attackers trying to exploit your services in several ways. The AWS security team published a whitepaper solution using AWS WAF, How to Mitigate OWASP’s Top 10 Web Application Vulnerabilities.
Regional API endpoints
Edge-optimized APIs are endpoints that are accessed through a CloudFront distribution created and managed by API Gateway. Before the launch of regional API endpoints, this was the default option when creating APIs using API Gateway. It primarily helped to reduce latency for API consumers that were located in different geographical locations than your API.
When API requests predominantly originate from an Amazon EC2 instance or other services within the same AWS Region as the API is deployed, a regional API endpoint typically lowers the latency of connections. It is recommended for such scenarios.
For better control around caching strategies, customers can use their own CloudFront distribution for regional APIs. They also have the ability to use AWS WAF protection, as I describe in this post.
Edge-optimized API endpoint
The following diagram is an illustrated example of the edge-optimized API endpoint where your API clients access your API through a CloudFront distribution created and managed by API Gateway.
Regional API endpoint
For the regional API endpoint, your customers access your API from the same Region in which your REST API is deployed. This helps you to reduce request latency and particularly allows you to add your own content delivery network, as needed.
Walkthrough
In this section, you implement the following steps:
Attach the web ACL to the CloudFront distribution.
Test AWS WAF protection.
Create the regional API
For this walkthrough, use an existing PetStore API. All new APIs launch by default as the regional endpoint type. To change the endpoint type for your existing API, choose the cog icon on the top right corner:
After you have created the PetStore API on your account, deploy a stage called “prod” for the PetStore API.
On the API Gateway console, select the PetStore API and choose Actions, Deploy API.
For Stage name, type prod and add a stage description.
Choose Deploy and the new API stage is created.
Use the following AWS CLI command to update your API from edge-optimized to regional:
{
"description": "Your first API with Amazon API Gateway. This is a sample API that integrates via HTTP with your demo Pet Store endpoints",
"createdDate": 1511525626,
"endpointConfiguration": {
"types": [
"REGIONAL"
]
},
"id": "{api-id}",
"name": "PetStore"
}
After you change your API endpoint to regional, you can now assign your own CloudFront distribution to this API.
Create a CloudFront distribution
To make things easier, I have provided an AWS CloudFormation template to deploy a CloudFront distribution pointing to the API that you just created. Click the button to deploy the template in the us-east-1 Region.
For Stack name, enter RegionalAPI. For APIGWEndpoint, enter your API FQDN in the following format:
{api-id}.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
After you fill out the parameters, choose Next to continue the stack deployment. It takes a couple of minutes to finish the deployment. After it finishes, the Output tab lists the following items:
A CloudFront domain URL
An S3 bucket for CloudFront access logs
Output from CloudFormation
Test the CloudFront distribution
To see if the CloudFront distribution was configured correctly, use a web browser and enter the URL from your distribution, with the following parameters:
With the new CloudFront distribution in place, you can now start setting up AWS WAF to protect your API.
For this demo, you deploy the AWS WAF Security Automations solution, which provides fine-grained control over the requests attempting to access your API.
For more information about deployment, see Automated Deployment. If you prefer, you can launch the solution directly into your account using the following button.
For CloudFront Access Log Bucket Name, add the name of the bucket created during the deployment of the CloudFormation stack for your CloudFront distribution.
The solution allows you to adjust thresholds and also choose which automations to enable to protect your API. After you finish configuring these settings, choose Next.
To start the deployment process in your account, follow the creation wizard and choose Create. It takes a few minutes do finish the deployment. You can follow the creation process through the CloudFormation console.
After the deployment finishes, you can see the new web ACL deployed on the AWS WAF console, AWSWAFSecurityAutomations.
Attach the AWS WAF web ACL to the CloudFront distribution
With the solution deployed, you can now attach the AWS WAF web ACL to the CloudFront distribution that you created earlier.
To assign the newly created AWS WAF web ACL, go back to your CloudFront distribution. After you open your distribution for editing, choose General, Edit.
Select the new AWS WAF web ACL that you created earlier, AWSWAFSecurityAutomations.
Save the changes to your CloudFront distribution and wait for the deployment to finish.
Test AWS WAF protection
To validate the AWS WAF Web ACL setup, use Artillery to load test your API and see AWS WAF in action.
To install Artillery on your machine, run the following command:
$ npm install -g artillery
After the installation completes, you can check if Artillery installed successfully by running the following command:
$ artillery -V
$ 1.6.0-12
As the time of publication, Artillery is on version 1.6.0-12.
One of the WAF web ACL rules that you have set up is a rate-based rule. By default, it is set up to block any requesters that exceed 2000 requests under 5 minutes. Try this out.
First, use cURL to query your distribution and see the API output:
What you are doing is firing 2000 requests to your API from 10 concurrent users. For brevity, I am not posting the Artillery output here.
After Artillery finishes its execution, try to run the cURL request again and see what happens:
$ curl -s https://{distribution-name}.cloudfront.net/prod/pets
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<HTML><HEAD><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>ERROR: The request could not be satisfied</TITLE>
</HEAD><BODY>
<H1>ERROR</H1>
<H2>The request could not be satisfied.</H2>
<HR noshade size="1px">
Request blocked.
<BR clear="all">
<HR noshade size="1px">
<PRE>
Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront)
Request ID: [removed]
</PRE>
<ADDRESS>
</ADDRESS>
</BODY></HTML>
As you can see from the output above, the request was blocked by AWS WAF. Your IP address is removed from the blocked list after it falls below the request limit rate.
Conclusion
In this first part, you saw how to use the new API Gateway regional API endpoint together with Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF to secure your API from a series of attacks.
In the second part, I will demonstrate some other techniques to protect your API using API keys and Amazon CloudFront custom headers.
When I talk with customers and partners, I find that they are in different stages in the adoption of DevOps methodologies. They are automating the creation of application artifacts and the deployment of their applications to different infrastructure environments. In many cases, they are creating and supporting multiple applications using a variety of coding languages and artifacts.
The management of these processes and artifacts can be challenging, but using the right tools and methodologies can simplify the process.
In this post, I will show you how you can automate the creation and storage of application artifacts through the implementation of a pipeline and custom deploy action in AWS CodePipeline. The example includes a Node.js code base stored in an AWS CodeCommit repository. A Node Package Manager (npm) artifact is built from the code base, and the build artifact is published to a JFrogArtifactory npm repository.
I frequently recommend AWS CodePipeline, the AWS continuous integration and continuous delivery tool. You can use it to quickly innovate through integration and deployment of new features and bug fixes by building a workflow that automates the build, test, and deployment of new versions of your application. And, because AWS CodePipeline is extensible, it allows you to create a custom action that performs customized, automated actions on your behalf.
JFrog’s Artifactory is a universal binary repository manager where you can manage multiple applications, their dependencies, and versions in one place. Artifactory also enables you to standardize the way you manage your package types across all applications developed in your company, no matter the code base or artifact type.
If you already have a Node.js CodeCommit repository, a JFrog Artifactory host, and would like to automate the creation of the pipeline, including the custom action and CodeBuild project, you can use this AWS CloudFormationtemplate to create your AWS CloudFormation stack.
This figure shows the path defined in the pipeline for this project. It starts with a change to Node.js source code committed to a private code repository in AWS CodeCommit. With this change, CodePipeline triggers AWS CodeBuild to create the npm package from the node.js source code. After the build, CodePipeline triggers the custom action job worker to commit the build artifact to the designated artifact repository in Artifactory.
This blog post assumes you have already:
· Created a CodeCommit repository that contains a Node.js project.
· Configured a two-stage pipeline in AWS CodePipeline.
The Source stage of the pipeline is configured to poll the Node.js CodeCommit repository. The Build stage is configured to use a CodeBuild project to build the npm package using a buildspec.yml file located in the code repository.
If you do not have a Node.js repository, you can create a CodeCommit repository that contains this simple ‘Hello World’ project. This project also includes a buildspec.yml file that is used when you define your CodeBuild project. It defines the steps to be taken by CodeBuild to create the npm artifact.
If you do not already have a pipeline set up in CodePipeline, you can use this template to create a pipeline with a CodeCommit source action and a CodeBuild build action through the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI). If you do not want to install the AWS CLI on your local machine, you can use AWS Cloud9, our managed integrated development environment (IDE), to interact with AWS APIs.
In your development environment, open your favorite editor and fill out the template with values appropriate to your project. For information, see the readme in the GitHub repository.
Use this CLI command to create the pipeline from the template:
aws codepipeline create-pipeline – cli-input-json file://source-build-actions-codepipeline.json – region 'us-west-2'
It creates a pipeline that has a CodeCommit source action and a CodeBuild build action.
Integrating JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory provides default repositories for your project needs. For my NPM package repository, I am using the default virtual npm repository (named npm) that is available in Artifactory Pro. You might want to consider creating a repository per project but for the example used in this post, using the default lets me get started without having to configure a new repository.
I can use the steps in the Set Me Up -> npm section on the landing page to configure my worker to interact with the default NPM repository.
Describes the required values to run the custom action. I will define my custom action in the ‘Deploy’ category, identify the provider as ‘Artifactory’, of version ‘1’, and specify a variety of configurationProperties whose values will be defined when this stage is added to my pipeline.
Polls CodePipeline for a job, scanning for its action-definition properties. In this blog post, after a job has been found, the job worker does the work required to publish the npm artifact to the Artifactory repository.
{
"category": "Deploy",
"configurationProperties": [{
"name": "TypeOfArtifact",
"required": true,
"key": true,
"secret": false,
"description": "Package type, ex. npm for node packages",
"type": "String"
},
{ "name": "RepoKey",
"required": true,
"key": true,
"secret": false,
"type": "String",
"description": "Name of the repository in which this artifact should be stored"
},
{ "name": "UserName",
"required": true,
"key": true,
"secret": false,
"type": "String",
"description": "Username for authenticating with the repository"
},
{ "name": "Password",
"required": true,
"key": true,
"secret": true,
"type": "String",
"description": "Password for authenticating with the repository"
},
{ "name": "EmailAddress",
"required": true,
"key": true,
"secret": false,
"type": "String",
"description": "Email address used to authenticate with the repository"
},
{ "name": "ArtifactoryHost",
"required": true,
"key": true,
"secret": false,
"type": "String",
"description": "Public address of Artifactory host, ex: https://myexamplehost.com or http://myexamplehost.com:8080"
}],
"provider": "Artifactory",
"version": "1",
"settings": {
"entityUrlTemplate": "{Config:ArtifactoryHost}/artifactory/webapp/#/artifacts/browse/tree/General/{Config:RepoKey}"
},
"inputArtifactDetails": {
"maximumCount": 5,
"minimumCount": 1
},
"outputArtifactDetails": {
"maximumCount": 5,
"minimumCount": 0
}
}
There are seven sections to the custom action definition:
category: This is the stage in which you will be creating this action. It can be Source, Build, Deploy, Test, Invoke, Approval. Except for source actions, the category section simply allows us to organize our actions. I am setting the category for my action as ‘Deploy’ because I’m using it to publish my node artifact to my Artifactory instance.
configurationProperties: These are the parameters or variables required for your project to authenticate and commit your artifact. In the case of my custom worker, I need:
TypeOfArtifact: In this case, npm, because it’s for the Node Package Manager.
RepoKey: The name of the repository. In this case, it’s the default npm.
UserName and Password for the user to authenticate with the Artifactory repository.
EmailAddress used to authenticate with the repository.
Artifactory host name or IP address.
provider: The name you define for your custom action stage. I have named the provider Artifactory.
version: Version number for the custom action. Because this is the first version, I set the version number to 1.
entityUrlTemplate: This URL is presented to your users for the deploy stage along with the title you define in your provider. The link takes the user to their artifact repository page in the Artifactory host.
inputArtifactDetails: The number of artifacts to expect from the previous stage in the pipeline.
outputArtifactDetails: The number of artifacts that should be the result from the custom action stage. Later in this blog post, I define 0 for my output artifacts because I am publishing the artifact to the Artifactory repository as the final action.
After I define the custom action in a JSON file, I use the AWS CLI to create the custom action type in CodePipeline:
After I create the custom action type in the same region as my pipeline, I edit the pipeline to add a Deploy stage and configure it to use the custom action I created for Artifactory:
I have created a custom worker for the actions required to commit the npm artifact to the Artifactory repository. The worker is in Python and it runs in a loop on an Amazon EC2 instance. My custom worker polls for a deploy job and publishes the NPM artifact to the Artifactory repository.
The EC2 instance is running Amazon Linux and has an IAM instance role attached that gives the worker permission to access CodePipeline. The worker process is as follows:
Take the configuration properties from the custom worker and poll CodePipeline for a custom action job.
After there is a job in the job queue with the appropriate category, provider, and version, acknowledge the job.
Download the zipped artifact created in the previous Build stage from the provided S3 buckets with the provided temporary credentials.
Unzip the artifact into a temporary directory.
A user-defined Artifactory user name and password is used to receive a temporary API key from Artifactory.
To avoid having to write the password to a file, use that temporary API key and user name to authenticate with the NPM repository.
Publish the Node.js package to the specified repository.
Because I am running my custom worker on an Amazon Linux EC2 instance, I installed npm with the following command:
sudo yum install nodejs npm – enablerepo=epel
For my custom worker, I used pip to install the required Python libraries:
pip install boto3 requests
For a full Python package list, see requirements.txt in the GitHub repository.
Let’s take a look at some of the code snippets from the worker.
First, the worker polls for jobs:
def action_type():
ActionType = {
'category': 'Deploy',
'owner': 'Custom',
'provider': 'Artifactory',
'version': '1' }
return(ActionType)
def poll_for_jobs():
try:
artifactory_action_type = action_type()
print(artifactory_action_type)
jobs = codepipeline.poll_for_jobs(actionTypeId=artifactory_action_type)
while not jobs['jobs']:
time.sleep(10)
jobs = codepipeline.poll_for_jobs(actionTypeId=artifactory_action_type)
if jobs['jobs']:
print('Job found')
return jobs['jobs'][0]
except ClientError as e:
print("Received an error: %s" % str(e))
raise
When there is a job in the queue, the poller returns a number of values from the queue such as jobId, the input and output S3 buckets for artifacts, temporary credentials to access the S3 buckets, and other configuration details from the stage in the pipeline.
After successfully receiving the job details, the worker sends an acknowledgement to CodePipeline to ensure that the work on the job is not duplicated by other workers watching for the same job:
def job_acknowledge(jobId, nonce):
try:
print('Acknowledging job')
result = codepipeline.acknowledge_job(jobId=jobId, nonce=nonce)
return result
except Exception as e:
print("Received an error when trying to acknowledge the job: %s" % str(e))
raise
With the job now acknowledged, the worker publishes the source code artifact into the desired repository. The worker gets the value of the artifact S3 bucket and objectKey from the inputArtifacts in the response from the poll_for_jobs API request. Next, the worker creates a new directory in /tmp and downloads the S3 object into this directory:
def get_bucket_location(bucketName, init_client):
region = init_client.get_bucket_location(Bucket=bucketName)['LocationConstraint']
if not region:
region = 'us-east-1'
return region
def get_s3_artifact(bucketName, objectKey, ak, sk, st):
init_s3 = boto3.client('s3')
region = get_bucket_location(bucketName, init_s3)
session = Session(aws_access_key_id=ak,
aws_secret_access_key=sk,
aws_session_token=st)
s3 = session.resource('s3',
region_name=region,
config=botocore.client.Config(signature_version='s3v4'))
try:
tempdirname = tempfile.mkdtemp()
except OSError as e:
print('Could not write temp directory %s' % tempdirname)
raise
bucket = s3.Bucket(bucketName)
obj = bucket.Object(objectKey)
filename = tempdirname + '/' + objectKey
try:
if os.path.dirname(objectKey):
directory = os.path.dirname(filename)
os.makedirs(directory)
print('Downloading the %s object and writing it to disk in %s location' % (objectKey, tempdirname))
with open(filename, 'wb') as data:
obj.download_fileobj(data)
except ClientError as e:
print('Downloading the object and writing the file to disk raised this error: ' + str(e))
raise
return(filename, tempdirname)
Because the downloaded artifact from S3 is a zip file, the worker must unzip it first. To have a clean area in which to work, I extract the downloaded zip archive into a new directory:
def unzip_codepipeline_artifact(artifact, origtmpdir):
# create a new temp directory
# Unzip artifact into new directory
try:
newtempdir = tempfile.mkdtemp()
print('Extracting artifact %s into temporary directory %s' % (artifact, newtempdir))
zip_ref = zipfile.ZipFile(artifact, 'r')
zip_ref.extractall(newtempdir)
zip_ref.close()
shutil.rmtree(origtmpdir)
return(os.listdir(newtempdir), newtempdir)
except OSError as e:
if e.errno != errno.EEXIST:
shutil.rmtree(newtempdir)
raise
The worker now has the npm package that I want to store in my Artifactory NPM repository.
To authenticate with the NPM repository, the worker requests a temporary token from the Artifactory host. After receiving this temporary token, it creates a .npmrc file in the worker user’s home directory that includes a hash of the user name and temporary token. After it has authenticated, the worker runs npm config set registry <URL OF REPOSITORY> to configure the npm registry value to be the Artifactory host. Next, the worker runs npm publish –registry <URL OF REPOSITORY>, which publishes the node package to the NPM repository in the Artifactory host.
def push_to_npm(configuration, artifact_list, temp_dir, jobId):
reponame = configuration['RepoKey']
art_type = configuration['TypeOfArtifact']
print("Putting artifact into NPM repository " + reponame)
token, hostname, username = gen_artifactory_auth_token(configuration)
npmconfigfile = create_npmconfig_file(configuration, username, token)
url = hostname + '/artifactory/api/' + art_type + '/' + reponame
print("Changing directory to " + str(temp_dir))
os.chdir(temp_dir)
try:
print("Publishing following files to the repository: %s " % os.listdir(temp_dir))
print("Sending artifact to Artifactory NPM registry URL: " + url)
subprocess.call(["npm", "config", "set", "registry", url])
req = subprocess.call(["npm", "publish", "--registry", url])
print("Return code from npm publish: " + str(req))
if req != 0:
err_msg = "npm ERR! Recieved non OK response while sending response to Artifactory. Return code from npm publish: " + str(req)
signal_failure(jobId, err_msg)
else:
signal_success(jobId)
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
print("Received an error when trying to commit artifact %s to repository %s: " % (str(art_type), str(configuration['RepoKey']), str(e)))
raise
return(req, npmconfigfile)
If the return value from publishing to the repository is not 0, the worker signals a failure to CodePipeline. If the value is 0, the worker signals success to CodePipeline to indicate that the stage of the pipeline has been completed successfully.
For the custom worker code, see npm_job_worker.py in the GitHub repository.
I run my custom worker on an EC2 instance using the command python npm_job_worker.py, with an optional --version flag that can be used to specify worker versions other than 1. Then I trigger a release change in my pipeline:
From my custom worker output logs, I have just committed a package named node_example at version 1.0.3:
On artifact: index.js
Committing to the repo: https://artifactory.myexamplehost.com/artifactory/api/npm/npm
Sending artifact to Artifactory URL: https:// artifactoryhost.myexamplehost.com/artifactory/api/npm/npm
npm config: 0
npm http PUT https://artifactory.myexamplehost.com/artifactory/api/npm/npm/node_example
npm http 201 https://artifactory.myexamplehost.com/artifactory/api/npm/npm/node_example
+ [email protected]
Return code from npm publish: 0
Signaling success to CodePipeline
After that has been built successfully, I can find my artifact in my Artifactory repository:
To help you automate this process, I have created this AWS CloudFormation template that automates the creation of the CodeBuild project, the custom action, and the CodePipeline pipeline. It also launches the Amazon EC2-based custom job worker in an AWS Auto Scaling group. This template requires you to have a VPC and CodeCommit repository for your Node.js project. If you do not currently have a VPC in which you want to run your custom worker EC2 instances, you can use this AWS QuickStart to create one. If you do not have an existing Node.js project, I’ve provided a sample project in the GitHub repository.
Conclusion
I‘ve shown you the steps to integrate your JFrog Artifactory repository with your CodePipeline workflow. I’ve shown you how to create a custom action in CodePipeline and how to create a custom worker that works in your CI/CD pipeline. To dig deeper into custom actions and see how you can integrate your Artifactory repositories into your AWS CodePipeline projects, check out the full code base on GitHub.
If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out to us through the AWS CodePipeline forum.
Erin McGill is a Solutions Architect in the AWS Partner Program with a focus on DevOps and automation tooling.
Slack is widely used by DevOps and development teams to communicate status. Typically, when a build has been tested and is ready to be promoted to a staging environment, a QA engineer or DevOps engineer kicks off the deployment. Using Slack in a ChatOps collaboration model, the promotion can be done in a single click from a Slack channel. And because the promotion happens through a Slack channel, the whole development team knows what’s happening without checking email.
In this blog post, I will show you how to integrate AWS services with a Slack application. I use an interactive message button and incoming webhook to promote a stage with a single click.
To follow along with the steps in this post, you’ll need a pipeline in AWS CodePipeline. If you don’t have a pipeline, the fastest way to create one for this use case is to use AWS CodeStar. Go to the AWS CodeStar console and select the Static Website template (shown in the screenshot). AWS CodeStar will create a pipeline with an AWS CodeCommit repository and an AWS CodeDeploy deployment for you. After the pipeline is created, you will need to add a manual approval stage.
You’ll also need to build a Slack app with webhooks and interactive components, write two Lambda functions, and create an API Gateway API and a SNS topic.
As you’ll see in the following diagram, when I make a change and merge a new feature into the master branch in AWS CodeCommit, the check-in kicks off my CI/CD pipeline in AWS CodePipeline. When CodePipeline reaches the approval stage, it sends a notification to Amazon SNS, which triggers an AWS Lambda function (ApprovalRequester).
The Slack channel receives a prompt that looks like the following screenshot. When I click Yes to approve the build promotion, the approval result is sent to CodePipeline through API Gateway and Lambda (ApprovalHandler). The pipeline continues on to deploy the build to the next environment.
Create a Slack app
For App Name, type a name for your app. For Development Slack Workspace, choose the name of your workspace. You’ll see in the following screenshot that my workspace is AWS ChatOps.
After the Slack application has been created, you will see the Basic Information page, where you can create incoming webhooks and enable interactive components.
To add incoming webhooks:
Under Add features and functionality, choose Incoming Webhooks. Turn the feature on by selecting Off, as shown in the following screenshot.
Now that the feature is turned on, choose Add New Webhook to Workspace. In the process of creating the webhook, Slack lets you choose the channel where messages will be posted.
After the webhook has been created, you’ll see its URL. You will use this URL when you create the Lambda function.
If you followed the steps in the post, the pipeline should look like the following.
Write the Lambda function for approval requests
This Lambda function is invoked by the SNS notification. It sends a request that consists of an interactive message button to the incoming webhook you created earlier. The following sample code sends the request to the incoming webhook. WEBHOOK_URL and SLACK_CHANNEL are the environment variables that hold values of the webhook URL that you created and the Slack channel where you want the interactive message button to appear.
# This function is invoked via SNS when the CodePipeline manual approval action starts.
# It will take the details from this approval notification and sent an interactive message to Slack that allows users to approve or cancel the deployment.
import os
import json
import logging
import urllib.parse
from base64 import b64decode
from urllib.request import Request, urlopen
from urllib.error import URLError, HTTPError
# This is passed as a plain-text environment variable for ease of demonstration.
# Consider encrypting the value with KMS or use an encrypted parameter in Parameter Store for production deployments.
SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL = os.environ['SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL']
SLACK_CHANNEL = os.environ['SLACK_CHANNEL']
logger = logging.getLogger()
logger.setLevel(logging.INFO)
def lambda_handler(event, context):
print("Received event: " + json.dumps(event, indent=2))
message = event["Records"][0]["Sns"]["Message"]
data = json.loads(message)
token = data["approval"]["token"]
codepipeline_name = data["approval"]["pipelineName"]
slack_message = {
"channel": SLACK_CHANNEL,
"text": "Would you like to promote the build to production?",
"attachments": [
{
"text": "Yes to deploy your build to production",
"fallback": "You are unable to promote a build",
"callback_id": "wopr_game",
"color": "#3AA3E3",
"attachment_type": "default",
"actions": [
{
"name": "deployment",
"text": "Yes",
"style": "danger",
"type": "button",
"value": json.dumps({"approve": True, "codePipelineToken": token, "codePipelineName": codepipeline_name}),
"confirm": {
"title": "Are you sure?",
"text": "This will deploy the build to production",
"ok_text": "Yes",
"dismiss_text": "No"
}
},
{
"name": "deployment",
"text": "No",
"type": "button",
"value": json.dumps({"approve": False, "codePipelineToken": token, "codePipelineName": codepipeline_name})
}
]
}
]
}
req = Request(SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL, json.dumps(slack_message).encode('utf-8'))
response = urlopen(req)
response.read()
return None
Create a SNS topic
Create a topic and then create a subscription that invokes the ApprovalRequester Lambda function. You can configure the manual approval action in the pipeline to send a message to this SNS topic when an approval action is required. When the pipeline reaches the approval stage, it sends a notification to this SNS topic. SNS publishes a notification to all of the subscribed endpoints. In this case, the Lambda function is the endpoint. Therefore, it invokes and executes the Lambda function. For information about how to create a SNS topic, see Create a Topic in the Amazon SNS Developer Guide.
Write the Lambda function for handling the interactive message button
This Lambda function is invoked by API Gateway. It receives the result of the interactive message button whether or not the build promotion was approved. If approved, an API call is made to CodePipeline to promote the build to the next environment. If not approved, the pipeline stops and does not move to the next stage.
The Lambda function code might look like the following. SLACK_VERIFICATION_TOKEN is the environment variable that contains your Slack verification token. You can find your verification token under Basic Information on Slack manage app page. When you scroll down, you will see App Credential. Verification token is found under the section.
# This function is triggered via API Gateway when a user acts on the Slack interactive message sent by approval_requester.py.
from urllib.parse import parse_qs
import json
import os
import boto3
SLACK_VERIFICATION_TOKEN = os.environ['SLACK_VERIFICATION_TOKEN']
#Triggered by API Gateway
#It kicks off a particular CodePipeline project
def lambda_handler(event, context):
#print("Received event: " + json.dumps(event, indent=2))
body = parse_qs(event['body'])
payload = json.loads(body['payload'][0])
# Validate Slack token
if SLACK_VERIFICATION_TOKEN == payload['token']:
send_slack_message(json.loads(payload['actions'][0]['value']))
# This will replace the interactive message with a simple text response.
# You can implement a more complex message update if you would like.
return {
"isBase64Encoded": "false",
"statusCode": 200,
"body": "{\"text\": \"The approval has been processed\"}"
}
else:
return {
"isBase64Encoded": "false",
"statusCode": 403,
"body": "{\"error\": \"This request does not include a vailid verification token.\"}"
}
def send_slack_message(action_details):
codepipeline_status = "Approved" if action_details["approve"] else "Rejected"
codepipeline_name = action_details["codePipelineName"]
token = action_details["codePipelineToken"]
client = boto3.client('codepipeline')
response_approval = client.put_approval_result(
pipelineName=codepipeline_name,
stageName='Approval',
actionName='ApprovalOrDeny',
result={'summary':'','status':codepipeline_status},
token=token)
print(response_approval)
Create the API Gateway API
In the Amazon API Gateway console, create a resource called InteractiveMessageHandler.
Create a POST method.
For Integration type, choose Lambda Function.
Select Use Lambda Proxy integration.
From Lambda Region, choose a region.
In Lambda Function, type a name for your function.
Now go back to your Slack application and enable interactive components.
To enable interactive components for the interactive message (Yes) button:
Under Features, choose Interactive Components.
Choose Enable Interactive Components.
Type a request URL in the text box. Use the invoke URL in Amazon API Gateway that will be called when the approval button is clicked.
Now that all the pieces have been created, run the solution by checking in a code change to your CodeCommit repo. That will release the change through CodePipeline. When the CodePipeline comes to the approval stage, it will prompt to your Slack channel to see if you want to promote the build to your staging or production environment. Choose Yes and then see if your change was deployed to the environment.
Conclusion
That is it! You have now created a Slack ChatOps solution using AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, AWS Lambda, Amazon API Gateway, and Amazon Simple Notification Service.
Now that you know how to do this Slack and CodePipeline integration, you can use the same method to interact with other AWS services using API Gateway and Lambda. You can also use Slack’s slash command to initiate an action from a Slack channel, rather than responding in the way demonstrated in this post.
Classic Bond villain, Elon Musk, has a new plan to create a website dedicated to measuring the credibility and adherence to “core truth” of journalists. He is, without any sense of irony, going to call this “Pravda”. This is not simply wrong but evil.
Musk has a point. Journalists do suck, and many suck consistently. I see this in my own industry, cybersecurity, and I frequently criticize them for their suckage.
But what he’s doing here is not correcting them when they make mistakes (or what Musk sees as mistakes), but questioning their legitimacy. This legitimacy isn’t measured by whether they follow established journalism ethics, but whether their “core truths” agree with Musk’s “core truths”.
An example of the problem is how the press fixates on Tesla car crashes due to its “autopilot” feature. Pretty much every autopilot crash makes national headlines, while the press ignores the other 40,000 car crashes that happen in the United States each year. Musk spies on Tesla drivers (hello, classic Bond villain everyone) so he can see the dip in autopilot usage every time such a news story breaks. He’s got good reason to be concerned about this.
He argues that autopilot is safer than humans driving, and he’s got the statistics and government studies to back this up. Therefore, the press’s fixation on Tesla crashes is illegitimate “fake news”, titillating the audience with distorted truth.
But here’s the thing: that’s still only Musk’s version of the truth. Yes, on a mile-per-mile basis, autopilot is safer, but there’s nuance here. Autopilot is used primarily on freeways, which already have a low mile-per-mile accident rate. People choose autopilot only when conditions are incredibly safe and drivers are unlikely to have an accident anyway. Musk is therefore being intentionally deceptive comparing apples to oranges. Autopilot may still be safer, it’s just that the numbers Musk uses don’t demonstrate this.
And then there is the truth calling it “autopilot” to begin with, because it isn’t. The public is overrating the capabilities of the feature. It’s little different than “lane keeping” and “adaptive cruise control” you can now find in other cars. In many ways, the technology is behind — my Tesla doesn’t beep at me when a pedestrian walks behind my car while backing up, but virtually every new car on the market does.
Yes, the press unduly covers Tesla autopilot crashes, but Musk has only himself to blame by unduly exaggerating his car’s capabilities by calling it “autopilot”.
What’s “core truth” is thus rather difficult to obtain. What the press satisfies itself with instead is smaller truths, what they can document. The facts are in such cases that the accident happened, and they try to get Tesla or Musk to comment on it.
What you can criticize a journalist for is therefore not “core truth” but whether they did journalism correctly. When such stories criticize “autopilot”, but don’t do their diligence in getting Tesla’s side of the story, then that’s a violation of journalistic practice. When I criticize journalists for their poor handling of stories in my industry, I try to focus on which journalistic principles they get wrong. For example, the NYTimes reporters do a lot of stories quoting anonymous government sources in clear violation of journalistic principles.
If “credibility” is the concern, then it’s the classic Bond villain here that’s the problem: Musk himself. His track record on business statements is abysmal. For example, when he announced the Model 3 he claimed production targets that every Wall Street analyst claimed were absurd. He didn’t make those targets, he didn’t come close. Model 3 production is still lagging behind Musk’s twice adjusted targets.
So who has a credibility gap here, the press, or Musk himself?
Not only is Musk’s credibility problem ironic, so is the name he chose, “Pravada”, the Russian word for truth that was the name of the Soviet Union Communist Party’s official newspaper. This is so absurd this has to be a joke, yet Musk claims to be serious about all this.
Yes, the press has a lot of problems, and if Musk were some journalism professor concerned about journalists meeting the objective standards of their industry (e.g. abusing anonymous sources), then this would be a fine thing. But it’s not. It’s Musk who is upset the press’s version of “core truth” does not agree with his version — a version that he’s proven time and time again differs from “real truth”.
Just in case Musk is serious, I’ve already registered “www.antipravda.com” to start measuring the credibility of statements by billionaire playboy CEOs. Let’s see who blinks first.
I stole the title, with permission, from this tweet:
Today, we’re happy to announce that the AWS GDPR Data Processing Addendum (GDPR DPA) is now part of our online Service Terms. This means all AWS customers globally can rely on the terms of the AWS GDPR DPA which will apply automatically from May 25, 2018, whenever they use AWS services to process personal data under the GDPR. The AWS GDPR DPA also includes EU Model Clauses, which were approved by the European Union (EU) data protection authorities, known as the Article 29 Working Party. This means that AWS customers wishing to transfer personal data from the European Economic Area (EEA) to other countries can do so with the knowledge that their personal data on AWS will be given the same high level of protection it receives in the EEA.
As we approach the GDPR enforcement date this week, this announcement is an important GDPR compliance component for us, our customers, and our partners. All customers which that are using cloud services to process personal data will need to have a data processing agreement in place between them and their cloud services provider if they are to comply with GDPR. As early as April 2017, AWS announced that AWS had a GDPR-ready DPA available for its customers. In this way, we started offering our GDPR DPA to customers over a year before the May 25, 2018 enforcement date. Now, with the DPA terms included in our online service terms, there is no extra engagement needed by our customers and partners to be compliant with the GDPR requirement for data processing terms.
The AWS GDPR DPA also provides our customers with a number of other important assurances, such as the following:
AWS will process customer data only in accordance with customer instructions.
AWS has implemented and will maintain robust technical and organizational measures for the AWS network.
AWS will notify its customers of a security incident without undue delay after becoming aware of the security incident.
Customers who have already signed an offline version of the AWS GDPR DPA can continue to rely on that GDPR DPA. By incorporating our GDPR DPA into the AWS Service Terms, we are simply extending the terms of our GDPR DPA to all customers globally who will require it under GDPR.
AWS GDPR DPA is only part of the story, however. We are continuing to work alongside our customers and partners to help them on their journey towards GDPR compliance.
If you have any questions about the GDPR or the AWS GDPR DPA, please contact your account representative, or visit the AWS GDPR Center at: https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/gdpr-center/
-Chad
Interested in AWS Security news? Follow the AWS Security Blog on Twitter.
Thanks to Susan Ferrell, Senior Technical Writer, for a great blog post on how to use CodeCommit branch-level permissions. —-
AWS CodeCommit users have been asking for a way to restrict commits to some repository branches to just a few people. In this blog post, we’re going to show you how to do that by creating and applying a conditional policy, an AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policy that contains a context key.
Why would I do this?
When you create a branch in an AWS CodeCommit repository, the branch is available, by default, to all repository users. Here are some scenarios in which refining access might help you:
You maintain a branch in a repository for production-ready code, and you don’t want to allow changes to this branch except from a select group of people.
You want to limit the number of people who can make changes to the default branch in a repository.
You want to ensure that pull requests cannot be merged to a branch except by an approved group of developers.
We’ll show you how to create a policy in IAM that prevents users from pushing commits to and merging pull requests to a branch named master. You’ll attach that policy to one group or role in IAM, and then test how users in that group are affected when that policy is applied. We’ll explain how it works, so you can create custom policies for your repositories.
What you need to get started
You’ll need to sign in to AWS with sufficient permissions to:
Create and apply policies in IAM.
Create groups in IAM.
Add users to those groups.
Apply policies to those groups.
You can use existing IAM groups, but because you’re going to be changing permissions, you might want to first test this out on groups and users you’ve created specifically for this purpose.
You’ll need a repository in AWS CodeCommit with at least two branches: master and test-branch. For information about how to create repositories, see Create a Repository. For information about how to create branches, see Create a Branch. In this blog post, we’ve named the repository MyDemoRepo. You can use an existing repository with branches of another name, if you prefer.
Let’s get started!
Create two groups in IAM
We’re going to set up two groups in IAM: Developers and Senior_Developers. To start, both groups will have the same managed policy, AWSCodeCommitPowerUsers, applied. Users in each group will have exactly the same permissions to perform actions in IAM.
Figure 1: Two example groups in IAM, with distinct users but the same managed policy applied to each group
In the navigation pane, choose Groups, and then choose Create New Group.
In the Group Name box, type Developers, and then choose Next Step.
In the list of policies, select the check box for AWSCodeCommitPowerUsers, then choose Next Step.
Choose Create Group.
Now, follow these steps to create the Senior_Developers group and attach the AWSCodeCommitPowerUsers managed policy. You now have two empty groups with the same policy attached.
Create users in IAM
Next, add at least one unique user to each group. You can use existing IAM users, but because you’ll be affecting their access to AWS CodeCommit, you might want to create two users just for testing purposes. Let’s go ahead and create Arnav and Mary.
In the navigation pane, choose Users, and then choose Add user.
For the new user, type Arnav_Desai.
Choose Add another user, and then type Mary_Major.
Select the type of access (programmatic access, access to the AWS Management Console, or both). In this blog post, we’ll be testing everything from the console, but if you want to test AWS CodeCommit using the AWS CLI, make sure you include programmatic access and console access.
For Console password type, choose Custom password. Each user is assigned the password that you type in the box. Write these down so you don’t forget them. You’ll need to sign in to the console using each of these accounts.
Choose Next: Permissions.
On the Set permissions page, choose Add user to group. Add Arnav to the Developers group. Add Mary to the Senior_Developers group.
Choose Next: Review to see all of the choices you made up to this point. When you are ready to proceed, choose Create user.
Sign in as Arnav, and then follow these steps to go to the master branch and add a file. Then sign in as Mary and follow the same steps.
On the Dashboard page, from the list of repositories, choose MyDemoRepo.
In the Code view, choose the branch named master.
Choose Add file, and then choose Create file. Type some text or code in the editor.
Provide information to other users about who added this file to the repository and why.
In Author name, type the name of the user (Arnav or Mary).
In Email address, type an email address so that other repository users can contact you about this change.
In Commit message, type a brief description to help you remember why you added this file or any other details you might find helpful.
Type a name for the file.
Choose Commit file.
Now follow the same steps to add a file in a different branch. (In our example repository, that’s the branch named test-branch.) You should be able to add a file to both branches regardless of whether you’re signed in as Arnav or Mary.
Let’s change that.
Create a conditional policy in IAM
You’re going to create a policy in IAM that will deny API actions if certain conditions are met. We want to prevent users with this policy applied from updating a branch named master, but we don’t want to prevent them from viewing the branch, cloning the repository, or creating pull requests that will merge to that branch. For this reason, we want to pick and choose our APIs carefully. Looking at the Permissions Reference, the logical permissions for this are:
GitPush
PutFile
MergePullRequestByFastForward
Now’s the time to think about what else you might want this policy to do. For example, because we don’t want users with this policy to make changes to this branch, we probably don’t want them to be able to delete it either, right? So let’s add one more permission:
DeleteBranch
The branch in which we want to deny these actions is master. The repository in which the branch resides is MyDemoRepo. We’re going to need more than just the repository name, though. We need the repository ARN. Fortunately, that’s easy to find. Just go to the AWS CodeCommit console, choose the repository, and choose Settings. The repository ARN is displayed on the General tab.
Now we’re ready to create a policy. 1. Open the IAM console at https://console.aws.amazon.com/iam/. Make sure you’re signed in with the account that has sufficient permissions to create policies, and not as Arnav or Mary. 2. In the navigation pane, choose Policies, and then choose Create policy. 3. Choose JSON, and then paste in the following:
You’ll notice a few things here. First, change the repository ARN to the ARN for your repository and include the repository name. Second, if you want to restrict access to a branch with a name different from our example, master, change that reference too.
Now let’s talk about this policy and what it does. You might be wondering why we’re using a Git reference (refs/heads) value instead of just the branch name. The answer lies in how Git references things, and how AWS CodeCommit, as a Git-based repository service, implements its APIs. A branch in Git is a simple pointer (reference) to the SHA-1 value of the head commit for that branch.
You might also be wondering about the second part of the condition, the nullification language. This is necessary because of the way git push and git-receive-pack work. Without going into too many technical details, when you attempt to push a change from a local repo to AWS CodeCommit, an initial reference call is made to AWS CodeCommit without any branch information. AWS CodeCommit evaluates that initial call to ensure that:
a) You’re authorized to make calls.
b) A repository exists with the name specified in the initial call. If you left that null out of the policy, users with that policy would be unable to complete any pushes from their local repos to the AWS CodeCommit remote repository at all, regardless of which branch they were trying to push their commits to.
Could you write a policy in such a way that the null is not required? Of course. IAM policy language is flexible. There’s an example of how to do this in the AWS CodeCommit User Guide, if you’re curious. But for the purposes of this blog post, let’s continue with this policy as written.
So what have we essentially said in this policy? We’ve asked IAM to deny the relevant CodeCommit permissions if the request is made to the resource MyDemoRepo and it meets the following condition: the reference is to refs/heads/master. Otherwise, the deny does not apply.
I’m sure you’re wondering if this policy has to be constrained to a specific repository resource like MyDemoRepo. After all, it would be awfully convenient if a single policy could apply to all branches in any repository in an AWS account, particularly since the default branch in any repository is initially the master branch. Good news! Simply replace the ARN with an *, and your policy will affect ALL branches named master in every AWS CodeCommit repository in your AWS account. Make sure that this is really what you want, though. We suggest you start by limiting the scope to just one repository, and then changing things when you’ve tested it and are happy with how it works.
When you’re sure you’ve modified the policy for your environment, choose Review policy to validate it. Give this policy a name, such as DenyChangesToMaster, provide a description of its purpose, and then choose Create policy.
Now that you have a policy, it’s time to apply and test it.
Apply the policy to a group
In theory, you could apply the policy you just created directly to any IAM user, but that really doesn’t scale well. You should apply this policy to a group, if you use IAM groups to manage users, or to a role, if your users assume a role when interacting with AWS resources.
In the IAM console, choose Groups, and then choose Developers.
On the Permissions tab, choose Attach Policy.
Choose DenyChangesToMaster, and then choose Attach policy.
Your groups now have a critical difference: users in the Developers group have an additional policy applied that restricts their actions in the master branch. In other words, Mary can continue to add files, push commits, and merge pull requests in the master branch, but Arnav cannot.
Figure 2: Two example groups in IAM, one with an additional policy applied that will prevent users in this group from making changes to the master branch
Test it out. Sign in as Arnav, and do the following:
On the Dashboard page, from the list of repositories, choose MyDemoRepo.
In the Code view, choose the branch named master.
Choose Add file, and then choose Create file, just as you did before. Provide some text, and then add the file name and your user information.
Choose Commit file.
This time you’ll see an error after choosing Commit file. It’s not a pretty message, but at the very end, you’ll see a telling phrase: “explicit deny”. That’s the policy in action. You, as Arnav, are explicitly denied PutFile, which prevents you from adding a file to the master branch. You’ll see similar results if you try other actions denied by that policy, such as deleting the master branch.
Stay signed in as Arnav, but this time add a file to test-branch. You should be able to add a file without seeing any errors. You can create a branch based on the master branch, add a file to it, and create a pull request that will merge to the master branch, all just as before. However, you cannot perform denied actions on that master branch.
Sign out as Arnav and sign in as Mary. You’ll see that as that IAM user, you can add and edit files in the master branch, merge pull requests to it, and even, although we don’t recommend this, delete it.
Conclusion
You can use conditional statements in policies in IAM to refine how users interact with your AWS CodeCommit repositories. This blog post showed how to use such a policy to prevent users from making changes to a branch named master. There are many other options. We hope this blog post will encourage you to experiment with AWS CodeCommit, IAM policies, and permissions. If you have any questions or suggestions, we’d love to hear from you.
This post courtesy of Jeff Levine Solutions Architect for Amazon Web Services
Amazon Linux 2 is the next generation of Amazon Linux, a Linux server operating system from Amazon Web Services (AWS). Amazon Linux 2 offers a high-performance Linux environment suitable for organizations of all sizes. It supports applications ranging from small websites to enterprise-class, mission-critical platforms.
Amazon Linux 2 includes support for the LAMP (Linux/Apache/MariaDB/PHP) stack, one of the most popular platforms for deploying websites. To secure the transmission of data-in-transit to such websites and prevent eavesdropping, organizations commonly leverage Secure Sockets Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL/TLS) services which leverage certificates to provide encryption. The LAMP stack provided by Amazon Linux 2 includes a self-signed SSL/TLS certificate. Such certificates may be fine for internal usage but are not acceptable when attestation by a certificate authority is required.
In this post, I discuss how to extend the capabilities of Amazon Linux 2 by installing Let’s Encrypt, a certificate authority provided by the Internet Security Research Group. Let’s Encrypt offers basic SSL/TLS certificates for DNS hosts at no charge that you can use to add encryption-in-transit to a single web server. For commercial or multi-server configurations, you should consider AWS Certificate Manager and Elastic Load Balancing.
Let’s Encrypt also requires the certbot package, which you install from EPEL, the Extra Packaged for Enterprise Linux collection. Although EPEL is not included with Amazon Linux 2, I show how you can install it from the Fedora Project.
Walkthrough
At a high level, you perform the following tasks for this walkthrough:
Provision a VPC, Amazon Linux 2 instance, and LAMP stack.
Install and enable the EPEL repository.
Install and configure Let’s Encrypt.
Validate the installation.
Clean up.
Prerequisites and costs
To follow along with this walkthrough, you need the following:
Accept all other default values including with regard to storage.
Create a new security group and accept the default rule that allows TCP port 22 (SSH) from everywhere (0.0.0.0/0 in IPv4). For the purposes of this walkthrough, permitting access from all IP addresses is reasonable. In a production environment, you may restrict access to different addresses.
Allocate and associate an Elastic IP address to the server when it enters the running state.
Respond “Y” to all requests for approval to install the software.
Step 3: Install and configure Let’s Encrypt
If you are no longer connected to the Amazon Linux 2 instance, connect to it at the Elastic IP address that you just created.
Install certbot, the Let’s Encrypt client to be used to obtain an SSL/TLS certificate and install it into Apache.
sudo yum install python2-certbot-apache.noarch
Respond “Y” to all requests for approval to install the software. If you see a message appear about SELinux, you can safely ignore it. This is a known issue with the latest version of certbot.
Create a DNS “A record” that maps a host name to the Elastic IP address. For this post, assume that the name of the host is lamp.example.com. If you are hosting your DNS in Amazon Route 53, do this by creating the appropriate record set.
After the “A record” has propagated, browse to lamp.example.com. The Apache test page should appear. If the page does not appear, use a tool such as nslookup on your workstation to confirm that the DNS record has been properly configured.
You are now ready to install Let’s Encrypt. Let’s Encrypt does the following:
Confirms that you have control over the DNS domain being used, by having you create a DNS TXT record using the value that it provides.
Obtains an SSL/TLS certificate.
Modifies the Apache-related scripts to use the SSL/TLS certificate and redirects users browsing the site in HTTP mode to HTTPS mode.
Use the following command to install certbot:
sudo certbot -i apache -a manual \
--preferred-challenges dns -d lamp.example.com
The options have the following meanings:
-i apache Use the Apache installer.
-a manual Authenticate domain ownership manually.
--preferred-challenges dns Use DNS TXT records for authentication challenge.
-d lamp.example.com Specify the domain for the SSL/TLS certificate.
You are prompted for the following information: E-mail address for renewals? Enter an email address for certificate renewals. Accept the terms of services? Respond as appropriate. Send your e-mail address to the EFF? Respond as appropriate. Log your current IP address? Respond as appropriate.
You are prompted to deploy a DNS TXT record with the name “_acme-challenge.lamp.example.com” with the supplied value, as shown below.
After you enter the record, wait until the TXT record propagates. To look up the TXT record to confirm the deployment, use the nslookup command in a separate command window, as shown below. Remember to use the set ty=txt command before entering the TXT record. You are prompted to select a virtual host. There is only one, so choose 1. The final prompt asks whether to redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS. To perform the redirection, choose 2. That completes the configuration of Let’s Encrypt.
Browse to the http:// lamp.example.com site. You are redirected to the SSL/TLS page https://lamp.example.com.
To look at the encryption information, use the appropriate actions within your browser. For example, in Firefox, you can open the padlock and traverse the menus. In the encryption technical details, you can see from the “Connection Encrypted” line that traffic to the website is now encrypted using TLS 1.2.
Security note: As of the time of publication, this website also supports TLS 1.0. I recommend that you disable this protocol because of some known vulnerabilities associated with it. To do this:
Edit the file /etc/letsencrypt/options-ssl-apache.conf.
Look for the line beginning with SSLProtocol and change it to the following:
SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 -SSLv3 -TLSv1
Save the file. After you make changes to this file, Let’s Encrypt no longer automatically updates it. Periodically check your log files for recommended updates to this file.
Restart the httpd server with the following command:
sudo service httpd restart
Step 5: Cleanup
Use the following steps to avoid incurring any further costs.
Terminate the Amazon Linux 2 instance that you created.
Release the Elastic IP address that you allocated.
Revert any DNS changes that you made, including the A and TXT records.
Conclusion
Amazon Linux 2 is an excellent option for hosting websites through the LAMP stack provided by the Amazon-Linux-Extras feature. You can then enhance the security of the Apache web server by installing EPEL and Let’s Encrypt. Let’s Encrypt provisions an SSL/TLS certificate, optionally installs it for you on the Apache server, and enables data-in-transit encryption. You can get started with Amazon Linux 2 in just a few clicks.
Attention, case modders: take a look at the Brutus 2, an extremely snazzy computer case with a partly transparent, animated side panel that’s powered by a Pi. Daniel Otto and Carsten Lehman have a current crowdfunder for the case; their video is in German, but the looks of the build speak for themselves. There are some truly gorgeous effects here.
Vorbestellungen ab sofort auf https://www.startnext.com/brutus2 Weitere Infos zu uns auf: https://3nb.de https://www.facebook.com/3nb.de https://www.instagram.com/3nb.de Über 3nb: – GbR aus Leipzig, gegründet 2017 – wir kommen aus den Bereichen Elektronik und Informatik – erstes Produkt: der Brutus One ein Gaming PC mit transparentem Display in der Seite Kurzinfo Brutus 2: – Markencomputergehäuse für Gaming- /Casemoddingszene – Besonderheit: animiertes Seitenfenster angesteuert mit einem Raspberry Pi – Vorteile von unserem Case: o Case ist einzeln lieferbar und nicht nur als komplett-PC o kein Leistungsverbrauch der Grafikkarte dank integriertem Raspberry Pi o bessere Darstellung von Texten und Grafiken durch unscharfen Hintergrund
What’s case modding?
Case modding just means modifying your computer or gaming console’s case, and it’s very popular in the gaming community. Some mods are functional, while others improve the way the case looks. Lots of dedicated gamers don’t only want a powerful computer, they also want it to look amazing — at home, or at LAN parties and games tournaments.
The Brutus 2 case
The Brutus 2 case is made by Daniel and Carsten’s startup, 3nb electronics, and it’s a product that is officially Powered by Raspberry Pi. Its standout feature is the semi-transparent TFT screen, which lets you play any video clip you choose while keeping your gaming hardware on display. It looks incredibly cool. All the graphics for the case’s screen are handled by a Raspberry Pi, so it doesn’t use any of your main PC’s GPU power and your gaming won’t suffer.
The software
To use Brutus 2, you just need to run a small desktop application on your PC to choose what you want to display on the case. A number of neat animations are included, and you can upload your own if you want.
So far, the app only runs on Windows, but 3nb electronics are planning to make the code open-source, so you can modify it for other operating systems, or to display other file types. This is true to the spirit of the case modding and Raspberry Pi communities, who love adapting, retrofitting, and overhauling projects and code to fit their needs.
Daniel and Carsten say that one of their campaign’s stretch goals is to implement more functionality in the Brutus 2 app. So in the future, the case could also show things like CPU temperature, gaming stats, and in-game messages. Of course, there’s nothing stopping you from integrating features like that yourself.
If you have any questions about the case, you can post them directly to Daniel and Carsten here.
The crowdfunding campaign
The Brutus 2 campaign on Startnext is currently halfway to its first funding goal of €10000, with over three weeks to go until it closes. If you’re quick, you still be may be able to snatch one of the early-bird offers. And if your whole guild NEEDS this, that’s OK — there are discounts for bulk orders.
As a serverless computing platform that supports Java 8 runtime, AWS Lambda makes it easy to run any type of Java function simply by uploading a JAR file. To help define not only a Lambda serverless application but also Amazon API Gateway, Amazon DynamoDB, and other related services, the AWS Serverless Application Model (SAM) allows developers to use a simple AWS CloudFormation template.
AWS provides the AWS Toolkit for Eclipse that supports both Lambda and SAM. AWS also gives customers an easy way to create Lambda functions and SAM applications in Java using the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI). After you build a JAR file, all you have to do is type the following commands:
To consolidate these steps, customers can use Archetype by Apache Maven. Archetype uses a predefined package template that makes getting started to develop a function exceptionally simple.
In this post, I introduce a Maven archetype that allows you to create a skeleton of AWS SAM for a Java function. Using this archetype, you can generate a sample Java code example and an accompanying SAM template to deploy it on AWS Lambda by a single Maven action.
Prerequisites
Make sure that the following software is installed on your workstation:
Java
Maven
AWS CLI
(Optional) AWS SAM CLI
Install Archetype
After you’ve set up those packages, install Archetype with the following commands:
git clone https://github.com/awslabs/aws-serverless-java-archetype
cd aws-serverless-java-archetype
mvn install
These are one-time operations, so you don’t run them for every new package. If you’d like, you can add Archetype to your company’s Maven repository so that other developers can use it later.
With those packages installed, you’re ready to develop your new Lambda Function.
Start a project
Now that you have the archetype, customize it and run the code:
cd /path/to/project_home
mvn archetype:generate \
-DarchetypeGroupId=com.amazonaws.serverless.archetypes \
-DarchetypeArtifactId=aws-serverless-java-archetype \
-DarchetypeVersion=1.0.0 \
-DarchetypeRepository=local \ # Forcing to use local maven repository
-DinteractiveMode=false \ # For batch mode
# You can also specify properties below interactively if you omit the line for batch mode
-DgroupId=YOUR_GROUP_ID \
-DartifactId=YOUR_ARTIFACT_ID \
-Dversion=YOUR_VERSION \
-DclassName=YOUR_CLASSNAME
You should have a directory called YOUR_ARTIFACT_ID that contains the files and folders shown below:
The sample code is a working example. If you install SAM CLI, you can invoke it just by the command below:
cd YOUR_ARTIFACT_ID
mvn -P invoke verify
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO] – -------------------------< com.riywo:foo >----------------------------
[INFO] Building foo 1.0
[INFO] – ------------------------------[ jar ]---------------------------------
...
[INFO] - – maven-jar-plugin:3.0.2:jar (default-jar) @ foo – -
[INFO] Building jar: /private/tmp/foo/target/foo-1.0.jar
[INFO]
[INFO] - – maven-shade-plugin:3.1.0:shade (shade) @ foo – -
[INFO] Including com.amazonaws:aws-lambda-java-core:jar:1.2.0 in the shaded jar.
[INFO] Replacing /private/tmp/foo/target/lambda.jar with /private/tmp/foo/target/foo-1.0-shaded.jar
[INFO]
[INFO] - – exec-maven-plugin:1.6.0:exec (sam-local-invoke) @ foo – -
2018/04/06 16:34:35 Successfully parsed template.yaml
2018/04/06 16:34:35 Connected to Docker 1.37
2018/04/06 16:34:35 Fetching lambci/lambda:java8 image for java8 runtime...
java8: Pulling from lambci/lambda
Digest: sha256:14df0a5914d000e15753d739612a506ddb8fa89eaa28dcceff5497d9df2cf7aa
Status: Image is up to date for lambci/lambda:java8
2018/04/06 16:34:37 Invoking Package.Example::handleRequest (java8)
2018/04/06 16:34:37 Decompressing /tmp/foo/target/lambda.jar
2018/04/06 16:34:37 Mounting /private/var/folders/x5/ldp7c38545v9x5dg_zmkr5kxmpdprx/T/aws-sam-local-1523000077594231063 as /var/task:ro inside runtime container
START RequestId: a6ae19fe-b1b0-41e2-80bc-68a40d094d74 Version: $LATEST
Log output: Greeting is 'Hello Tim Wagner.'
END RequestId: a6ae19fe-b1b0-41e2-80bc-68a40d094d74
REPORT RequestId: a6ae19fe-b1b0-41e2-80bc-68a40d094d74 Duration: 96.60 ms Billed Duration: 100 ms Memory Size: 128 MB Max Memory Used: 7 MB
{"greetings":"Hello Tim Wagner."}
[INFO] – ----------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] – ----------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 10.452 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-06T16:34:40+09:00
[INFO] – ----------------------------------------------------------------------
This maven goal invokes sam local invoke -e event.json, so you can see the sample output to greet Tim Wagner.
To deploy this application to AWS, you need an Amazon S3 bucket to upload your package. You can use the following command to create a bucket if you want:
aws s3 mb s3://YOUR_BUCKET – region YOUR_REGION
Now, you can deploy your application by just one command!
mvn deploy \
-DawsRegion=YOUR_REGION \
-Ds3Bucket=YOUR_BUCKET \
-DstackName=YOUR_STACK
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO] – -------------------------< com.riywo:foo >----------------------------
[INFO] Building foo 1.0
[INFO] – ------------------------------[ jar ]---------------------------------
...
[INFO] - – exec-maven-plugin:1.6.0:exec (sam-package) @ foo – -
Uploading to aws-serverless-java/com.riywo:foo:1.0/924732f1f8e4705c87e26ef77b080b47 11657 / 11657.0 (100.00%)
Successfully packaged artifacts and wrote output template to file target/sam.yaml.
Execute the following command to deploy the packaged template
aws cloudformation deploy – template-file /private/tmp/foo/target/sam.yaml – stack-name <YOUR STACK NAME>
[INFO]
[INFO] - – maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy (default-deploy) @ foo – -
[INFO] Skipping artifact deployment
[INFO]
[INFO] - – exec-maven-plugin:1.6.0:exec (sam-deploy) @ foo – -
Waiting for changeset to be created..
Waiting for stack create/update to complete
Successfully created/updated stack - archetype
[INFO] – ----------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] – ----------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 37.176 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-06T16:41:02+09:00
[INFO] – ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maven automatically creates a shaded JAR file, uploads it to your S3 bucket, replaces template.yaml, and creates and updates the CloudFormation stack.
To customize the process, modify the pom.xml file. For example, to avoid typing values for awsRegion, s3Bucket or stackName, write them inside pom.xml and check in your VCS. Afterward, you and the rest of your team can deploy the function by typing just the following command:
mvn deploy
Options
Lambda Java 8 runtime has some types of handlers: POJO, Simple type and Stream. The default option of this archetype is POJO style, which requires to create request and response classes, but they are baked by the archetype by default. If you want to use other type of handlers, you can use handlerType property like below:
## POJO type (default)
mvn archetype:generate \
...
-DhandlerType=pojo
## Simple type - String
mvn archetype:generate \
...
-DhandlerType=simple
### Stream type
mvn archetype:generate \
...
-DhandlerType=stream
Also, Lambda Java 8 runtime supports two types of Logging class: Log4j 2 and LambdaLogger. This archetype creates LambdaLogger implementation by default, but you can use Log4j 2 if you want:
If you use LambdaLogger, you can delete ./src/main/resources/log4j2.xml. See documentation for more details.
Conclusion
So, what’s next? Develop your Lambda function locally and type the following command: mvn deploy !
With this Archetype code example, available on GitHub repo, you should be able to deploy Lambda functions for Java 8 in a snap. If you have any questions or comments, please submit them below or leave them on GitHub.
I’ve been busy trying to replicate the “eFail” PGP/SMIME bug. I thought I’d write up some notes.
PGP and S/MIME encrypt emails, so that eavesdroppers can’t read them. The bugs potentially allow eavesdroppers to take the encrypted emails they’ve captured and resend them to you, reformatted in a way that allows them to decrypt the messages.
Disable remote/external content in email
The most important defense is to disable “external” or “remote” content from being automatically loaded. This is when HTML-formatted emails attempt to load images from remote websites. This happens legitimately when they want to display images, but not fill up the email with them. But most of the time this is illegitimate, they hide images on the webpage in order to track you with unique IDs and cookies. For example, this is the code at the end of an email from politician Bernie Sanders to his supporters. Notice the long random number assigned to track me, and the width/height of this image is set to one pixel, so you don’t even see it:
Such trackers are so pernicious they are disabled by default in most email clients. This is an example of the settings in Thunderbird:
The problem is that as you read email messages, you often get frustrated by the fact the error messages and missing content, so you keep adding exceptions:
The correct defense against this eFail bug is to make sure such remote content is disabled and that you have no exceptions, or at least, no HTTP exceptions. HTTPS exceptions (those using SSL) are okay as long as they aren’t to a website the attacker controls. Unencrypted exceptions, though, the hacker can eavesdrop on, so it doesn’t matter if they control the website the requests go to. If the attacker can eavesdrop on your emails, they can probably eavesdrop on your HTTP sessions as well.
Some have recommended disabling PGP and S/MIME completely. That’s probably overkill. As long as the attacker can’t use the “remote content” in emails, you are fine. Likewise, some have recommend disabling HTML completely. That’s not even an option in any email client I’ve used — you can disable sending HTML emails, but not receiving them. It’s sufficient to just disable grabbing remote content, not the rest of HTML email rendering.
I couldn’t replicate the direct exfiltration
There rare two related bugs. One allows direct exfiltration, which appends the decrypted PGP email onto the end of an IMG tag (like one of those tracking tags), allowing the entire message to be decrypted.
An example of this is the following email. This is a standard HTML email message consisting of multiple parts. The trick is that the IMG tag in the first part starts the URL (blog.robertgraham.com/…) but doesn’t end it. It has the starting quotes in front of the URL but no ending quotes. The ending will in the next chunk.
The next chunk isn’t HTML, though, it’s PGP. The PGP extension (in my case, Enignmail) will detect this and automatically decrypt it. In this case, it’s some previous email message I’ve received the attacker captured by eavesdropping, who then pastes the contents into this email message in order to get it decrypted.
What should happen at this point is that Thunderbird will generate a request (if “remote content” is enabled) to the blog.robertgraham.com server with the decrypted contents of the PGP email appended to it. But that’s not what happens. Instead, I get this:
I am indeed getting weird stuff in the URL (the bit after the GET /), but it’s not the PGP decrypted message. Instead what’s going on is that when Thunderbird puts together a “multipart/mixed” message, it adds it’s own HTML tags consisting of lines between each part. In the email client it looks like this:
The HTML code it adds looks like:
That’s what you see in the above URL, all this code up to the first quotes. Those quotes terminate the quotes in the URL from the first multipart section, causing the rest of the content to be ignored (as far as being sent as part of the URL).
So at least for the latest version of Thunderbird, you are accidentally safe, even if you have “remote content” enabled. Though, this is only according to my tests, there may be a work around to this that hackers could exploit.
STARTTLS
In the old days, email was sent plaintext over the wire so that it could be passively eavesdropped on. Nowadays, most providers send it via “STARTTLS”, which sorta encrypts it. Attackers can still intercept such email, but they have to do so actively, using man-in-the-middle. Such active techniques can be detected if you are careful and look for them.
Some organizations don’t care. Apparently, some nation states are just blocking all STARTTLS and forcing email to be sent unencrypted. Others do care. The NSA will passively sniff all the email they can in nations like Iraq, but they won’t actively intercept STARTTLS messages, for fear of getting caught.
The consequence is that it’s much less likely that somebody has been eavesdropping on you, passively grabbing all your PGP/SMIME emails. If you fear they have been, you should look (e.g. send emails from GMail and see if they are intercepted by sniffing the wire).
You’ll know if you are getting hacked
If somebody attacks you using eFail, you’ll know. You’ll get an email message formatted this way, with multipart/mixed components, some with corrupt HTML, some encrypted via PGP. This means that for the most part, your risk is that you’ll be attacked only once — the hacker will only be able to get one message through and decrypt it before you notice that something is amiss. Though to be fair, they can probably include all the emails they want decrypted as attachments to the single email they sent you, so the risk isn’t necessarily that you’ll only get one decrypted.
As mentioned above, a lot of attackers (e.g. the NSA) won’t attack you if its so easy to get caught. Other attackers, though, like anonymous hackers, don’t care.
Somebody ought to write a plugin to Thunderbird to detect this.
Summary
It only works if attackers have already captured your emails (though, that’s why you use PGP/SMIME in the first place, to guard against that).
It only works if you’ve enabled your email client to automatically grab external/remote content.
It seems to not be easily reproducible in all cases.
Instead of disabling PGP/SMIME, you should make sure your email client hast remote/external content disabled — that’s a huge privacy violation even without this bug.
Notes: The default email client on the Mac enables remote content by default, which is bad:
Yesterday, I received an email from someone called Mayank Sinha, showing us the Raspberry Pi home security project he’s been working on. He got in touch particularly because, he writes, the Raspberry Pi community has given him “immense support” with his build, and he wanted to dedicate it to the commmunity as thanks.
Mayank’s project is named Asfaleia, a Greek word that means safety, certainty, or security against threats. It’s part of an honourable tradition dating all the way back to 2012: it’s a prototype housed in a polystyrene box, using breadboards and jumper leads and sticky tape. And it’s working! Take a look.
An IOT based home security system. The link to the code: https://github.com/mayanksinha11/Asfaleia
Home security with Asfaleida
Asfaleia has a PIR (passive infrared) motion sensor, an IR break beam sensor, and a gas sensor. All are connected to a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B, the latter two via a NodeMCU board. Mayank currently has them set up in a box that’s divided into compartments to model different rooms in a house.
All the best prototypes have sticky tape or rubber bands
If the IR sensors detect motion or a broken beam, the webcam takes a photo and emails it to the build’s owner, and the build also calls their phone (I like your ringtone, Mayank). If the gas sensor detects a leak, the system activates an exhaust fan via a small relay board, and again the owner receives a phone call. The build can also authenticate users via face and fingerprint recognition. The software that runs it all is written in Python, and you can see Mayank’s code on GitHub.
Of prototypes and works-in-progess
Reading Mayank’s email made me very happy yesterday. We know that thousands of people in our community give a great deal of time and effort to help others learn and make things, and it is always wonderful to see an example of how that support is helping someone turn their ideas into reality. It’s great, too, to see people sharing works-in-progress, as well as polished projects! After all, the average build is more likely to feature rubber bands and Tupperware boxes than meticulously designed laser-cut parts or expert joinery. Mayank’s YouTube channel shows earlier work on this and another Pi project, and I hope he’ll continue to document his builds.
So here’s to Raspberry Pi projects big, small, beginner, professional, endlessly prototyped, unashamedly bodged, unfinished or fully working, shonky or shiny. Please keep sharing them all!
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
