<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>patching &#8211; Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://noise.getoto.net/tag/patching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://noise.getoto.net</link>
	<description>The collective thoughts of the interwebz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Hacking Electronic Safes</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/09/17/hacking-electronic-safes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[backdoors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Vulnerabilities in <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/securam-prologic-safe-lock-backdoor-exploits/">electronic safes</a> that use Securam Prologic locks:</p>
<blockquote><p>While both their techniques represent glaring security vulnerabilities, Omo says it’s the one that exploits a feature intended as a legitimate unlock method for locksmiths that’s the more widespread and dangerous. “This attack is something where, if you had a safe with this kind of lock, I could literally pull up the code right now with no specialized hardware, nothing,” Omo says. “All of a sudden, based on our testing, it seems like people can get into almost any Securam Prologic lock in the world.”...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Project Zero Changes Its Disclosure Policy</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2025/08/08/google-project-zero-changes-its-disclosure-policy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 11:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=70559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Google’s vulnerability finding team is again <a href="https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/google-report-new-vulnerabilities/">pushing the envelope</a> of responsible disclosure:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google’s Project Zero team will retain its existing 90+30 policy regarding vulnerability disclosures, in which it provides vendors with 90 days before full disclosure takes place, with a 30-day period allowed for patch adoption if the bug is fixed before the deadline.</p>
<p>However, as of July 29, Project Zero will also release limited details about any discovery they make within one week of vendor disclosure. This information will encompass:</p>
<ul>
<li>The vendor or open-source project that received the report
...</li></ul></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Grimes on Prioritizing Cybersecurity Advice</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/10/31/roger-grimes-on-prioritizing-cybersecurity-advice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-factor authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/every-cybersecurity-list-should-risk-ranked-roger-grimes-ippze">good point</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Part of the problem is that we are constantly handed lists…list of required controls…list of things we are being asked to fix or improve…lists of new projects…lists of threats, and so on, that are not ranked for risks. For example, we are often given a cybersecurity guideline (e.g., PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOX, NIST, etc.) with hundreds of recommendations. They are all great recommendations, which if followed, will reduce risk in your environment.</p>
<p>What they do not tell you is which of the recommended things will have the most impact on best reducing risk in your environment. They do not tell you that one, two or three of these things…among the hundreds that have been given to you, will reduce more risk than all the others...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacy Ivanti Cloud Service Appliance Being Exploited</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/09/16/legacy-ivanti-cloud-service-appliance-being-exploited/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet of Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CISA wants everyone&#8212;and government agencies in particular&#8212;to remove or upgrade an Ivanti Cloud Service Appliance (CSA) that is no longer being supported.
Welcome to the security nightmare that is the Internet of Things.
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacking Wireless Bicycle Shifters</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/08/20/hacking-wireless-bicycle-shifters/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[academic papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet of Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is yet another insecure Internet-of-things story, this one about wireless gear shifters for bicycles. These gear shifters are used in big-money professional bicycle races like the Tour de France, which provides an incentive to actually implement t...]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Windows IPv6 Zero-Click Vulnerability</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/08/16/new-windows-ipv6-zero-click-vulnerability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=69269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The press is <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/zero-click-windows-tcp-ip-rce-impacts-all-systems-with-ipv6-enabled-patch-now/">reporting</a> a critical Windows vulnerability affecting IPv6.</p>
<blockquote><p>As Microsoft explained in its Tuesday advisory, unauthenticated attackers can exploit the flaw remotely in low-complexity attacks by repeatedly sending IPv6 packets that include specially crafted packets.</p>
<p>Microsoft also shared its exploitability assessment for this critical vulnerability, tagging it with an “exploitation more likely” label, which means that threat actors could create exploit code to “consistently exploit the flaw in attacks.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Details are being withheld at the moment. Microsoft strongly recommends ...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Chrome Vulnerability</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/05/14/another-chrome-vulnerability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 11:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero day]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=68884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Google has <a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/05/google-patches-its-fifth-zero-day-vulnerability-of-the-year-in-chrome/">patched</a> another Chrome zero-day:</p>
<blockquote><p>On Thursday, Google <a href="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2024/05/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_9.html">said</a> an anonymous source notified it of the vulnerability. The vulnerability carries a severity rating of 8.8 out of 10. In response, Google said, it would be releasing versions 124.0.6367.201/.202 for macOS and Windows and 124.0.6367.201 for Linux in subsequent days.</p>
<p>“Google is aware that an exploit for CVE-2024-4671 exists in the wild,” the company said.</p>
<p>Google didn’t provide any other details about the exploit, such as what platforms were targeted, who was behind the exploit, or what they were using it for...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Squid Blogging: Unpatched Vulnerabilities in the Squid Caching Proxy</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/11/18/friday-squid-blogging-unpatched-vulnerabilities-in-the-squid-caching-proxy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[computer security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[squid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a rare squid/security post, here&#8217;s an article about unpatched vulnerabilities in the Squid caching proxy.
As usual, you can also use this squid post to talk about the security stories in the news that I haven’t covered.
Read my blog posting gu...]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackLotus Malware Hijacks Windows Secure Boot Process</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/03/08/blacklotus-malware-hijacks-windows-secure-boot-process/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=67031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Researchers have <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/03/unkillable-uefi-malware-bypassing-secure-boot-enabled-by-unpatchable-windows-flaw/">discovered</a> malware that “can hijack a computer’s boot process even when Secure Boot and other advanced protections are enabled and running on fully updated versions of Windows.”</p>
<blockquote><p>Dubbed BlackLotus, the malware is what’s known as a UEFI bootkit. These sophisticated pieces of malware target the UEFI—short for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface">Unified Extensible Firmware Interface</a>—the low-level and complex chain of firmware responsible for booting up virtually every modern computer. As the mechanism that bridges a PC’s device firmware with its operating system, the UEFI is an OS in its own right. It’s located in an ...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arresting IT Administrators</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/12/27/arresting-it-administrators/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 12:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberattack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=66419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This is one way of ensuring that IT <a href="https://apnews.com/article/iran-europe-middle-east-albania-tirana-39fce9b5fe112a43f8b35a533b6d29e8">keeps up with patches</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Albanian prosecutors on Wednesday asked for the house arrest of five public employees they blame for not protecting the country from a cyberattack by alleged Iranian hackers.</p>
<p>Prosecutors said the five IT officials of the public administration department had failed to check the security of the system and update it with the most recent antivirus software.</p></blockquote>
<p>The next step would be to arrest managers at software companies for not releasing patches fast enough. And maybe programmers for writing buggy code. I don’t know where this line of thinking ends...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Microsoft Code-Execution Vulnerability</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/12/22/critical-microsoft-code-execution-vulnerability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 12:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=66401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A critical code-execution vulnerability in Microsoft Windows was patched in September. It seems that researchers <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/12/critical-windows-code-execution-vulnerability-went-undetected-until-now/">just realized</a> how serious it was (and is):</p>
<blockquote><p>Like EternalBlue, CVE-2022-37958, as the latest vulnerability is tracked, allows attackers to execute malicious code with no authentication required. Also, like EternalBlue, it’s wormable, meaning that a single exploit can trigger a chain reaction of self-replicating follow-on exploits on other vulnerable systems. The wormability of EternalBlue allowed WannaCry and several other attacks to spread across the world in a matter of minutes with no user interaction required...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Patches iPhone Zero-Day</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/12/16/apple-patches-iphone-zero-day/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero day]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=66378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The most recent iPhone update—to version 16.1.2—patches a zero-day vulnerability <a href="https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213516">that</a> “may have been actively exploited against versions of iOS released before iOS 15.1.”</p>
<p><a href="https://techcrunch.com/2022/12/13/apple-zero-day-webkit-iphone/">News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Apple said security researchers at Google’s Threat Analysis Group, which investigates nation state-backed spyware, hacking and cyberattacks, discovered and reported the WebKit bug.</p>
<p>WebKit bugs are often exploited when a person visits a malicious domain in their browser (or via the in-app browser). It’s not uncommon for bad actors to find vulnerabilities that target WebKit as a way to break into the device’s operating system and the user’s private data. WebKit bugs can be “chained” to other vulnerabilities to break through multiple layers of a device’s defenses...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Only Commits to Patching Latest OS Version</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/10/31/apple-only-commits-to-patching-latest-os-version/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=66022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>People have suspected this for a while, but Apple has made it official. It <a href="https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/web">only</a> commits to fully patching the latest version of its OS, even though it claims to support older versions.</p>
<p>From <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/apple-clarifies-security-update-policy-only-the-latest-oses-are-fully-patched/">ArsTechnica</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In other words, while Apple will provide security-related updates for older versions of its operating systems, only the most recent upgrades will receive updates for every security problem Apple knows about. Apple currently provides security updates to macOS 11 Big Sur and macOS 12 Monterey alongside the newly released <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/macos-13-ventura-the-ars-technica-review/">macOS Ventura</a>, and in the past, it has released security updates for older iOS versions for devices that can’t install the latest upgrades...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Vulnerability in Open SSL</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/10/28/critical-vulnerability-in-open-ssl/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 13:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=66019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There are no details yet, but it’s really important that you <a href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/openssl-warns-of-critical-security-vulnerability-with-upcoming-patch/">patch</a> Open SSL 3.x when the new version comes out on Tuesday.</p>
<blockquote><p>How bad is “Critical”? According to OpenSSL, an issue of <a href="https://www.openssl.org/policies/general/security-policy.html">critical severity</a> affects common configurations and is also likely exploitable. </p>
<p>It’s likely to be abused to disclose server memory contents, and potentially reveal user details, and could be easily exploited remotely to compromise server private keys or execute code execute remotely. In other words, pretty much everything you don’t want happening on your production systems...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responsible Disclosure for Cryptocurrency Security</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/09/09/responsible-disclosure-for-cryptocurrency-security/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[blockchain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptocurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=65853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Stewart Baker <a href="https://www.lawfareblog.com/rethinking-responsible-disclosure-cryptocurrency-security">discusses</a> why the industry-norm responsible disclosure for software vulnerabilities fails for cryptocurrency software.</p>
<blockquote><p>Why can’t the cryptocurrency industry solve the problem the way the software and hardware industries do, by patching and updating security as flaws are found? Two reasons: First, many customers don’t have an ongoing relationship with the hardware and software providers that protect their funds­—nor do they have an incentive to update security on a regular basis. Turning to a new security provider or using updated software creates risks; leaving everything the way it was feels safer. So users won’t be rushing to pay for and install new security patches...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clever — and Exploitable — Windows Zero-Day</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/06/01/clever-and-exploitable-windows-zero-day/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero day]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=65487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have reported a still-unpatched Windows zero-day that is currently being exploited in the wild.
Here&#8217;s the advisory, which includes a work-around until a patch is available.
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java Cryptography Implementation Mistake Allows Digital-Signature Forgeries</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/04/22/java-cryptography-implementation-mistake-allows-digital-signature-forgeries/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=65348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/04/major-crypto-blunder-in-java-enables-psychic-paper-forgeries/">implementation mistake</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The vulnerability, which <a href="https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html">Oracle patched on Tuesday</a>, affects the company’s implementation of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signature_Algorithm">Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm</a> in Java versions 15 and above. ECDSA is an algorithm that uses the principles of <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/a-relatively-easy-to-understand-primer-on-elliptic-curve-cryptography/">elliptic curve cryptography</a> to authenticate messages digitally.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>ECDSA signatures rely on a pseudo-random number, typically notated as K, that’s used to derive two additional numbers, R and S. To verify a signature as valid, a party must check the equation involving R and S, the signer’s public key, and a cryptographic hash of the message. When both sides of the equation are equal, the signature is valid. ...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vendors are Fixing Security Flaws Faster</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/02/16/vendors-are-fixing-security-flaws-faster/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=65078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Google’s Project Zero is <a href="https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2022/02/a-walk-through-project-zero-metrics.html">reporting</a> that software vendors are patching their code faster.</p>
<blockquote><p>tl;dr</p>
<ul>
<li>In 2021, vendors took an average of 52 days to fix security vulnerabilities reported from Project Zero. This is a significant acceleration from an average of about 80 days 3 years ago.
</li><li>In addition to the average now being well below the 90-day deadline, we have also seen a dropoff in vendors missing the deadline (or the additional 14-day grace period). In 2021, only one bug exceeded its fix deadline, though 14% of bugs required the grace period.
</li><li>Differences in the amount of time it takes a vendor/product to ship a fix to users reflects their product design, development practices, update cadence, and general processes towards security reports. We hope that this comparison can showcase best practices, and encourage vendors to experiment with new policies.
...</li></ul></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Log4j News</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2021/12/16/more-log4j-news/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero day]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=64660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Log4j is <a href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/log4j-flaw-nearly-half-of-corporate-networks-have-been-targeted-by-attackers-trying-to-use-this-vulnerability/">being exploited</a> by all sorts of attackers, all over the Internet:</p>
<blockquote><p>At that point it was reported that there were over 100 attempts to exploit the vulnerability every minute. “Since we started to implement our protection we prevented over 1,272,000 attempts to allocate the vulnerability, over 46% of those attempts were made by known malicious groups,” said cybersecurity company Check Point.</p>
<p>And according to Check Point, attackers have now attempted to exploit the flaw on over 40% of global networks.</p></blockquote>
<p>And a <a href="https://www.zdnet.com/article/second-log4j-vulnerability-found-apache-log4j-2-16-0-released/">second</a> <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2021/12/patch-fixing-critical-log4j-0-day-has-its-own-vulnerability-thats-under-exploit/">vulnerability</a> was found, in the patch for the first vulnerability. This is likely not to be the last...</p>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zero-Click iMessage Exploit</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2021/09/17/zero-click-imessage-exploit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=63678</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Citizen Lab released a report on a zero-click iMessage exploit that is used in NSO Group&#8217;s Pegasus spyware.
Apple patched the vulnerability; everyone needs to update their OS immediately.
News articles on the exploit.
]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 65/272 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching using Memcached

Served from: noise.getoto.net @ 2025-12-05 14:01:00 by W3 Total Cache
-->