<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sensors &#8211; Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://noise.getoto.net/tag/sensors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://noise.getoto.net</link>
	<description>The collective thoughts of the interwebz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Side Channels Are Common</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2024/01/23/side-channels-are-common/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 12:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[academic papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[side-channel attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=68327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting research: “<a href="https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity22/presentation/genkin">Lend Me Your Ear: Passive Remote Physical Side Channels on PCs</a>.”</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Abstract:</b></p>
<p>We show that built-in sensors in commodity PCs, such as microphones, inadvertently capture electromagnetic side-channel leakage from ongoing computation. Moreover, this information is often conveyed by supposedly-benign channels such as audio recordings and common Voice-over-IP applications, even after lossy compression.</p>
<p>Thus, we show, it is possible to conduct physical side-channel attacks on computation by remote and purely passive analysis of commonly-shared channels. These attacks require neither physical proximity (which could be mitigated by distance and shielding), nor the ability to run code on the target or configure its hardware. Consequently, we argue, physical side channels on PCs can no longer be excluded from remote-attack threat models...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Laptop Fingerprint Sensors</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2023/11/29/breaking-laptop-fingerprint-sensors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=68143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>They’re <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/researchers-beat-windows-hello-fingerprint-sensors-with-raspberry-pi-and-linux/">not that good</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Security researchers Jesse D’Aguanno and Timo Teräs write that, with varying degrees of reverse-engineering and using some external hardware, they were able to fool the Goodix fingerprint sensor in a Dell Inspiron 15, the Synaptic sensor in a Lenovo ThinkPad T14, and the ELAN sensor in one of Microsoft’s own Surface Pro Type Covers. These are just three laptop models from the wide universe of PCs, but one of these three companies usually does make the fingerprint sensor in every laptop we’ve reviewed in the last few years. It’s likely that most Windows PCs with fingerprint readers will be vulnerable to similar exploits...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smartphones and Civilians in Wartime</title>
		<link>https://noise.getoto.net/2022/06/09/smartphones-and-civilians-in-wartime/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 11:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.schneier.com/?p=65503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/smartphones-ukraine-civilian-combatant/">article</a> about civilians using smartphones to assist their militaries in wartime, and how that blurs the important legal distinction between combatants and non-combatants:</p>
<blockquote><p>The <a href="https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&#38;documentId=8A9E7E14C63C7F30C12563CD0051DC5C">principle of distinction</a> between the two roles is a critical cornerstone of international humanitarian law­—the law of armed conflict, codified by decades of customs and laws such as the Geneva Conventions. Those considered civilians and civilian targets are not to be attacked by military forces; as they are not combatants, they should be spared. At the same time, they also should not act as combatants—­if they do, they may lose this status...</p></blockquote>]]></description>
		
		
		<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />

			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 30/84 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Database Caching using Memcached

Served from: noise.getoto.net @ 2025-12-11 16:02:58 by W3 Total Cache
-->