Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2009/07/17/microsoft-patent-aggression.html

I think this news
item from yesterday mostly speaks for itself, but I could not let the
incident go by without blogging briefly about it.

There has been so much talk in the last two weeks that Microsoft has
changed with regard to its patent policy toward Free Software. We fool
ourselves if we trust any of the window-dressing that Microsoft has put
forward to convince us that we can trust them in this regard. Indeed, I
spoke extensively about this in my interview on the Linux
Outlaws show this week.

What we see in this agreement between the Melco Group and Microsoft is
another little above-water piece of the same patent aggression iceberg
that Microsoft has placed in our community’s way. They continue to shake
down companies that distribute GNU/Linux systems for patent royalties. As
I’ve written about before, it’s
difficult to judge if these are GPLv2-compliant, but they are almost
certainly not GPLv3-compliant. If there were ever a moment for the
community to scramble to GPLv3, this would be it, if for no other reason
to defend ourselves against the looming aggression.

In the meantime, we’d be foolish to trust any sort of promises
Microsoft has to make about their patents. Would they really make a
reliable promise that would prevent their ongoing campaign of patent
aggression against Free Software?

Update: In related news, I was also glad to read FSF’s new statement on the issue, which includes some of the same comments I made on Linux Outlaws Episode 102.