Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2015/12/02/sjw.html

I have something to say that I’m sure everyone is going to consider
controversial. I’ve been meaning to say it for some time, and I realize
that it’s going to get some annoyance from all sides of this debate.
Conservancy may lose
Supporters over this,
even though this is my personal blog and my personal opinion, and views
expressed here aren’t necessarily Conservancy’s views. I’ve actually been
meaning to write this publicly for a year. I just have to say it now,
because there’s yet another event on this issue caused yet another a war of
words in our community.

If you follow the types of Free Software politics and issues that I do
(which you probably do if you read my blog) you have heard the phrase
— which has become globally common in general politics —
“Social Justice Warrior”, often abbreviated SJW. As anyone who
reads my blog probably already knows, SJW is used as a derogatory catch-all
phrase referring to anyone who speaks up to on any cause, but particularly
on racial or gender inequality. While the derogatory part seems
superficially to refer to tactics rather than strategic positions,
nevertheless many critics who use the phrase conflate (either purposely or
not) some specific, poorly-chosen tactic (perhaps from long ago) of the few
with the strategic goals of an entire movement.

Anyway, my argument in this post, which is why I expect it to annoy
everyone equally, is not about some specific issue in any cause, but on a
meta-issue. The meta-issue is the term “SJW” itself. The
first time I heard the phrase (which, given my age, feels recent, even
though it was probably four years ago), I actually thought it was something
good; I first thought that SJW was a compliment. In fact, I’ve
more-or-less spent my entire adult life wanting to be a
social justice warrior, although I typically called it being a
“social justice activist”.

First of all, I believe deeply in social justice causes. I care about
equality, fairness, and justice for everyone. I believe software freedom is a
social justice cause, and I personally have proudly called software freedom
a social justice cause for more than a decade.

Second, I also believe in the zealous pursuit of causes that matter. I’ve
believed fully and completely in non-violence since the mid-1980s, but I
nevertheless believe there is a constant war of words in the politics
surrounding any cause or issue, including software freedom. I am,
therefore — for lack of a better word — a warrior, in those
politics.

So, when I look at the three words on their face: Social. Justice.
Warrior. Well, denotively, it describes my lifelong work exactly.

Connotatively, a warped and twisted manipulation of words has occurred.
Those, who want to discredit the validity of various social justice causes,
have bestowed a negative connotation on the phrase to create a social
environment that makes anyone who wants to speak out about a cause
automatically wrong and easily branded.

I’ve suggested to various colleagues privately over the last two years
that we should coopt the phrase back to mean something good. Most
have said that’s a waste of time and beside the point. I still wonder
whether they’re right.

By communicating an idea that these social justice people are fighting
against me and oppressing me, the messenger accusing a so-called SJW
has a politically powerful, well-coopted message, carefully constructed for
concision and confirmation bias. While I don’t believe all that cooptive
and manipulative power is wielded solely in the one three-word phrase, I do
believe that the rhetorical trick that allows “SJW” to have a
negative connotation is the same rhetorical power that has for centuries
allowed the incumbent power structures to keep their control of those many
social institutions that are governed chiefly by rhetoric.

And this is precisely why I just had to finally post something about this.
I won a cultural power jackpot, merely by being born a middle-class
Caucasian boy in the USA. Having faced some adversity in my life despite
that luck, and then seeing how easy I had it compared to the adversity that
others have faced, I become furious at how the existing power structures
can brand people with — let’s call it what is — a sophisticated
form of name-calling that coopts a phrase like “social
justice”, which until that time had a history of describing some of
the greatest, most selfless, and most important acts of human history.

Yes, I know there are bigger issues at stake than just the words people
use. But words matter. No matter how many people use the phrase
negatively, I continue to strive to be a social justice warrior. I believe
that’s a good thing, in the tradition of all those who have fought for a
cause they believed was right, even when it wasn’t popular.