Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2019/12/31/donate-conservancy.html
Yesterday, I sent out a version of this blog post to Conservancy’s donors
as a fundraising email. As most people reading this already know, I work
(remotely from the west coast) for a 501(c)(3) charity based in NY
called Software Freedom
Conservancy, which is funded primarily
from individuals like you
who donate $120/year (or more 🙂. My primary job and career since 1997
has been working for various charities, mostly related to the general cause
of software freedom.
More generally, I have dedicated myself since the late 1990s to software
freedom activism. Looking back across these two decades, I believe our
movement, focused on software users’ rights, faces the most difficult
challenges yet. In particular, I believe 2019 was the most challenging year
in our community’s history.
Our movement had early success. Most of our primary software development
tools remain (for the moment) mostly Free Software. Rarely do new
developers face the kinds of challenges that proprietary software
originally brought us. In the world today that seemingly embraces Open
Source, the problems are more subtle and complex than they once
were. Conservancy dedicates its work to addressing those enigmatic
problems. That’s why I work here, why I’m glad to support the organization
myself, and why I ask you to support it as well.
Early success was easy for software freedom because the technology
industry ignored us at first. Copyleft
was initially a successful antidote to the very first Digital Restrictions
Management (DRM) — separating the binaries from source code and using
copyright restrictions to forbid sharing. When companies attacked software
freedom and copyleft in the early 2000s, we were lucky that those attacks
backfired. However, today, we must solve the enigma that the technology
industry seems to embrace software freedom, but only to a
point. Most for-profit companies today ask a key question constantly:
“what Open Source technologies can we leverage while keeping an
unfair proprietary edge?”. FOSS is accepted in the enterprise but only if it
allows companies to proprietarize, particularly in areas that specifically
threaten user privacy and autonomy.
However, I and my colleagues at Conservancy are realists. We know that a
charity like us won’t ever have the resources to face well-funded companies
on their own playing field, and we’d be fools to try. So, we do what Free
Software has always done best: we pick work with the greatest potential to
maximize software freedom for as many users as we can.
At Conservancy’s founding, Conservancy focused exclusively on providing a
charitable home to FOSS projects, so they could focus on software freedom for
their users. Through Conservancy, projects make software freedom the
project’s top priority rather than an afterthought. In this new environment
where (seemingly) every company and trade association has set up a system for
organizational homes for projects, Conservancy focuses on projects that make
a big impact for the software freedom of individual users.
Today, Conservancy does much more beyond those basics. Given my early
introduction to licensing, I learned early and often that copyleft —
our community’s primary tool and strategy to assure companies and
individuals would always remain equals — was and would always be
constantly under attack. I’ve thus been glad to
help Conservancy publish and speak regularly about essential copyleft and FOSS policy.
(And, I’m personally working right now on even more writing on the subject
of copyleft policy.) I’m particularly proud of Conservancy’s work with
members of the Linux community to assure the software freedoms guaranteed
by copyleft for Linux-based devices. It’s a big task, and we’re the only
organization with that mission. But, Conservancy is resilient, unrelenting,
and dedicated to it.
If someone had predicted 28 years ago (when I first installed Linux) that,
by 2020, Linux would be the most popular operating system on the most
popular small devices in the world, but that almost no one would have the
basic freedoms assured by copyleft, the thought would have horrified
me. Manufacturers have treated Linux device users like the proverbial frogs
in slowly boiling water, so we saw once a trickle and now an onslaught of
non-upgradable, non-modifiable, Linux-based IoT and mobile devices as a
norm; we’re even sometimes tricked into believing such infringing usage
counts as success for software freedom. I’m glad to help Conservancy
support and organize the primary group who continues to demand that the GPL
matters and should be upheld for Linux. We shouldn’t ignore users; their
personal rights, privacy, and control of their own technology are at stake
— and copyleft should assure their path to software freedom. That
path is now deeply buried in complicated legal and political debris, but I
believe that Conservancy will clear that path, and I and my colleagues at
Conservancy have a plan for it.
As we close out 2018, I must admit how tough this year has been for all of
us with regard to leadership
in the broader software freedom movement. I spent a large part of 2019
deeply involved with the political and social work of moving forward
together in the face of the leadership crises and assuring the software
freedom movement spans generations diversely. Having lived through this
troubled year, I’ve come to a simple conclusion: we must be loyal to the
principles of software freedom, not to individual people. We must build a
welcoming community that is friendly to those who are different from us;
those folks are most likely to bring us desperately needed new ideas and
perspectives. I’m thus proud that Conservancy continues to host the
Outreachy initiative, which is the
premier internship program that seeks to bring those who have faced
specific hardships related to diversity and inclusion into the wonders of
FOSS development and leadership.
We’ve all had a tough 2019 for many reasons, and I certainly believe it’s
the most challenging year I’ve seen in my many years of software freedom
activism. But, I don’t shy away from a challenge: I am looking forward to
helping Conservancy work tirelessly to lead the way out of difficulty, with
new approaches.
Obviously I’m going to help with my staff time at Conservancy , for which
I am (obviously) paid a salary. (As I always joke, my salary has been a
matter of public record since 2001, you just have
to read the 501(c)(3)
Form 990s of the organizations I’ve worked for.) I am very lucky that
I was born into the middle class in a wealthy country. I believe it’s
important to acknowledge the privilege that comes with advantages we
receive due to sheer luck. In recent years, I’ve focused on how I can use
that privilege to help the social justice causes that I care about. In
addition to devoting my career to a charity, I also think giving back
financially to charity is important. Each year, I usually give my largest
charitable donation to the charity where I
work, Software Freedom
Conservancy.
It does feel strange to me to give money back to an organization that also
pays me a salary. However, I do it because: (a) it’s entirely voluntary
(thus showing clearly that it isn’t merely a run-of-the-mill paycut :), (b)
it help Conservancy meet
our meet
our annual match challenge, and (c) I spend some of my time each winter
asking everyone I know to also voluntarily give. I hope you’ll join me
today in becoming (or
renewing!) as a Conservancy Supporter. I hope you’ll set your
Supporter contribution at a level higher than the minimum. Usually,
computer geeks love to give amounts that are even powers of 2. This year,
I suggested that was perhaps a bit hackneyed, so we set our donor challenge
around prime numbers (the original match amount was $113,093). So, I
planned ahead a frugal year so that I could give $1,021 today to
Conservancy. I generally planned all year to give “about a
thousand” at year’s
end for the
match, but I picked $1,021 specifically because it’s the closest prime
number to 210. I think it makes sense to give to charity
amounts of about about $60-100/month, as that’s typically the amount that
any middle class person in a wealthy country can afford if they just cut
out a few luxuries (e.g., DRM-laden streaming services, cooking at home
rather than eating at restaurants, etc.).
So, please join me today in contributing to Conservancy. Most
importantly, perhaps, today is the last day to donate for a USA tax
deduction in 2019! If you pay taxes in the USA, do take a look at the
deduction, because I’ve found in my fiscal planning that it does make a
budgeting difference and means I can give a bit more, knowing that I’ll get
some of it back from both the USA and state government.