Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2013/04/06/meme-hustler.html

All this past week, people have been emailing and/or pinging me on IRC to
tell me to read the
article, The Meme Hustler by Evgeny Morozov. The
article is quite long, and while my day-job duties left me TL;DR’ing it
for most of the week, I’ve now read it, and I understand why everyone
kept sending me the article. I encourage you not to TL;DR it any longer
yourself.

Morozov centers his criticisms on Tim O’Reilly, but that’s not all the
article is about. I spend my days walking the Free Software beat as a
(self-admitted) unelected politician, and I’ve encounter many spin doctors,
including O’Reilly — most of whom wear the trappings of advocates for
software freedom. As Morozov points out, O’Reilly isn’t the only one; he’s
just the best at it. Morozov’s analysis of O’Reilly can help us understand
these P.T. Barnum‘s
in our midst.

In 2001, I
co-wrote Freedom
or Power? with RMS in response to O’Reilly’s
very Randian arguments
(which Morozov discusses). I remember working on that essay for
(literally) days with RMS, in-person at the FSF offices (and at his office
at MIT), while he would (again, literally) dance around the room, deep in
thought, and then run back to the screen where I was writing to suggest a
new idea or phrase to add. We both found it was really difficult to craft
the right rhetoric to refute O’Reilly’s points. (BTW, most people don’t
know that there were two versions of my and RMS’ essay; the original one
was published as a
direct
response to O’Reilly on his own website. One of the reasons RMS and I
redrafted as a stand-alone piece was that we saw our original published
response actually served to increase uptake of O’Reilly’s
position. We decided the issue was important enough it needed a piece that
would stand on its own indefinitely to defend that key position.)

Meanwhile, I find it difficult to express more than a decade later how
turbulent that time was for hard-core Free Software advocates, and how
concerted the marketing campaign against us was. While we were in the
middle of the Microsoft’s attacks that GPL was an unAmerican cancer, we
also had O’Reilly’s the freedom that matters is the freedom to pick
one’s own license meme propagating fast. There were dirty politics
afoot at the time, too: this all occurred during the same three-month
period
when Eric
Raymond called me an inmate taking over the asylum. In other words,
the spin doctors were attacking software freedom advocates
from every side! Morozov’s article captures a bit of what
it feels like to be on the wrong side of a concerted, organized PR campaign
to manipulate public opinion.

However, I suppose what I like most about Morozov’s article is it’s the
first time I’ve seen discussed publicly and coherently a rhetorical trick
that spin doctors use. Notice when you listen to a pundit at their undue
sense of urgency; they invariably act as if what’s happening now is somehow
(to use a phrase the pundits love): “game changing”. What I
typically see is such folks use urgency as a reason to make compromises
quickly. Of course, the real goal is a get-rich-(or-famous)-quick scheme
for themselves — not a greater cause. The sense of urgency leaves
many people feeling that if they don’t follow the meme, they’ll be left in
the dust. A colleague of mine once described this entrancing effect as
dream-like, and that desire to stay asleep and keep dreaming is what
lets the hustlers keep us under their spell.

I’ve admittedly spent more time than I’d like refuting these spin doctors
(or, as Morozov also calls them, meme hustlers). Such work seems
unfortunately necessary because Free Software is in an important, multi-decade (but
admittedly not urgent 🙂 battle of cooption (which, BTW, every
social justice movement throughout history has faced). The tide of
cooption by spin doctors can be stemmed only with constant vigilance, so I
practice it.

Still, this all seems a cold, academic way to talk about the phenomenon.
For these calculating Frank Luntz types, winning is enough;
rhetoric, to them, is almost an end in itself (which I guess one might dub
“Cicero 2.0”). For those of us who believe in the cause, the
“game for the game’s sake” remains distasteful because there
are real principles at stake for us. Meanwhile, the most talented of these
meme hustlers know well that what’s a game to them
matters emotionally to us, so they use our genuine concern against
us at every turn. And, to make it worse, there’s more of them out there
than most people realize — usually carefully donning the trappings of
allies. Kudos to Morozov for reminding us how many of these emperors have
no clothes.

Post Syndicated from Oglaf! -- Comics. Often dirty. original https://www.oglaf.com/abyss/

Post Syndicated from Oglaf! -- Comics. Often dirty. original https://www.oglaf.com/gifted/