The other speakers mostly talked about how cool AI was—and sometimes about how cool their own company was—but I was asked by the Democrats to specifically talk about DOGE and the risks of exfiltrating our data from government agencies and feeding it into AIs.
My written testimony is here. Video of the hearing is here.
There’s a lot of talk right now about building AI agents, but not a lot out there about what it takes to make those agents truly useful.
An Agent is an autonomous system designed to make decisions and perform actions to achieve a specific goal or set of goals, without human input.
No matter how good your agent is at making decisions, you will need a person to provide guidance or input on the agent’s path towards its goal. After all, an agent that cannot interact or respond to the outside world and the systems that govern it will be limited in the problems it can solve.
That’s where the “human-in-the-loop” interaction pattern comes in. You’re bringing a human into the agent’s loop and requiring an input from that human before the agent can continue on its task.
In this blog post, we’ll useKnock and the CloudflareAgents SDK to build an AI Agent for a virtual card issuing workflow that requires human approval when a new card is requested.
Knock is messaging infrastructure you can use to send multi-channel messages across in-app, email, SMS, push, and Slack, without writing any integration code.
With Knock, you gain complete visibility into the messages being sent to your users while also handling reliable delivery, user notification preferences, and more.
You can use Knock to power human-in-the-loop flows for your agents using Knock’sAgent Toolkit, which is a set of tools that expose Knock’s APIs and messaging capabilities to your AI agents.
Using the Agent SDK as the foundation of our AI Agent
The Agents SDK provides an abstraction for building stateful, real-time agents on top of Durable Objects that are globally addressable and persist state using an embedded, zero-latency SQLite database.
Building an AI agent outside of using the Agents SDK and the Cloudflare platform means we need to consider WebSocket servers, state persistence, and how to scale our service horizontally. Because a Durable Object backs the Agents SDK, we receive these benefits for free, while having a globally addressable piece of compute with built-in storage, that’s completely serverless and scales to zero.
In the example, we’ll use these features to build an agent that users interact with in real-time via chat, and that can be paused and resumed as needed. The Agents SDK is the ideal platform for powering asynchronous agentic workflows, such as those required in human-in-the-loop interactions.
Setting up our Knock messaging workflow
Within Knock, we design our approval workflow using the visual workflow builder to create the cross-channel messaging logic. We then make the notification templates associated with each channel to which we want to send messages.
Knock will automatically apply theuser’s preferences as part of the workflow execution, ensuring that your user’s notification settings are respected.
You can find an example workflow that we’ve already created for this demo in the repository. You can use this workflow template via theKnock CLI to import it into your account.
Building our chat UI
We’ve built the AI Agent as a chat interface on top of the AIChatAgent abstraction from Cloudflare’s Agents SDK (docs). The Agents SDK here takes care of the bulk of the complexity, and we’re left to implement our LLM calling code with our system prompt.
// src/index.ts
import { AIChatAgent } from "agents/ai-chat-agent";
import { openai } from "@ai-sdk/openai";
import { createDataStreamResponse, streamText } from "ai";
export class AIAgent extends AIChatAgent {
async onChatMessage(onFinish) {
return createDataStreamResponse({
execute: async (dataStream) => {
try {
const stream = streamText({
model: openai("gpt-4o-mini"),
system: `You are a helpful assistant for a financial services company. You help customers with credit card issuing.`,
messages: this.messages,
onFinish,
maxSteps: 5,
});
stream.mergeIntoDataStream(dataStream);
} catch (error) {
console.error(error);
}
},
});
}
}
On the client side, we’re using the useAgentChat hook from the agents/ai-react package to power the real-time user-to-agent chat.
We’ve modeled our agent as a chat per user, which we set up using the useAgent hook by specifying the name of the process as the userId.
This means we have an agent process, and therefore a durable object, per-user. For our human-in-the-loop use case, this becomes important later on as we talk about resuming our deferred tool call.
Deferring the tool call to Knock
We give the agent our card issuing capability through exposing an issueCard tool. However, instead of writing the approval flow and cross-channel logic ourselves, we delegate it entirely to Knock by wrapping the issue card tool in our requireHumanInput method.
Now when the user asks to request a new card, we make a call out to Knock to initiate our card request, which will notify the appropriate admins in the organization to request an approval.
To set this up, we need to use Knock’s Agent Toolkit, which exposes methods to work with Knock in our AI agent and power cross-channel messaging.
import { createKnockToolkit } from "@knocklabs/agent-toolkit/ai-sdk";
import { tool } from "ai";
import { z } from "zod";
import { AIAgent } from "./index";
import { issueCard } from "./api";
import { BASE_URL } from "./constants";
async function initializeToolkit(agent: AIAgent) {
const toolkit = await createKnockToolkit({ serviceToken: agent.env.KNOCK_SERVICE_TOKEN });
const issueCardTool = tool({
description: "Issue a new credit card to a customer.",
parameters: z.object({
customerId: z.string(),
}),
execute: async ({ customerId }) => {
return await issueCard(customerId);
},
});
const { issueCard } = toolkit.requireHumanInput(
{ issueCard: issueCardTool },
{
workflow: "approve-issued-card",
actor: agent.name,
recipients: ["admin_user_1"],
metadata: {
approve_url: `${BASE_URL}/card-issued/approve`,
reject_url: `${BASE_URL}/card-issued/reject`,
},
}
);
return { toolkit, tools: { issueCard } };
}
There’s a lot going on here, so let’s walk through the key parts:
We wrap our issueCard tool in the requireHumanInput method, exposed from the Knock Agent Toolkit
We want the messaging workflow to be invoked to be our approve-issued-card workflow
We pass the agent.name as the actor of the request, which translates to the user ID
We set the recipient of this workflow to be the user admin_user_1
We pass the approve and reject URLs so that they can be used in our message templates
The wrapped tool is then returned as issueCard
Under the hood, these options are passed to theKnock workflow trigger API to invoke a workflow per-recipient. The set of the recipients listed here could be dynamic, or go to a group of users throughKnock’s subscriptions API.
We can then pass the wrapped issue card tool to our LLM call in the onChatMessage method on the agent so that the tool call can be called as part of the interaction with the agent.
export class AIAgent extends AIChatAgent {
// ... other methods
async onChatMessage(onFinish) {
const { tools } = await initializeToolkit(this);
return createDataStreamResponse({
execute: async (dataStream) => {
const stream = streamText({
model: openai("gpt-4o-mini"),
system: "You are a helpful assistant for a financial services company. You help customers with credit card issuing.",
messages: this.messages,
onFinish,
tools,
maxSteps: 5,
});
stream.mergeIntoDataStream(dataStream);
},
});
}
}
Now when the agent calls the issueCardTool, we invoke Knock to send our approval notifications, deferring the tool call to issue the card until we receive an approval. Knock’s workflows take care of sending out the message to the set of recipient’s specified, generating and delivering messages according to each user’s preferences.
Using Knockworkflows for our approval message makes it easy to build cross-channel messaging to reach the user according to their communicationpreferences. We can also leveragedelays,throttles,batching, andconditions to orchestrate more complex messaging.
Handling the approval
Once the message has been sent to our approvers, the next step is to handle the approval coming back, bringing the human into the agent’s loop.
The approval request is asynchronous, meaning that the response can come at any point in the future. Fortunately, Knock takes care of the heavy lifting here for you, routing the event to the agent worker via awebhook that tracks the interaction with the underlying message. In our case, that’s a click to the “approve” or “reject” button.
First, we set up a message.interacted webhook handler within the Knock dashboard to forward the interactions to our worker, and ultimately to our agent process.
In our example here, we route the approval click back to the worker to handle, appending a Knock message ID to the end of the approve_url and reject_url to track engagement against the specific message sent. We do this via liquid inside of our message templates in Knock: {{ data.approve_url }}?messageId={{ current_message.id }} . One caveat here is that if this were a production application, we’re likely going to handle our approval click in a different application than this agent is running. We co-located it here for the purposes of this demo only.
Once the link is clicked, we have a handler in our worker to mark the message as interacted using Knock’smessage interaction API, passing through the status as metadata so that it can be used later.
import Knock from '@knocklabs/node';
import { Hono } from "hono";
const app = new Hono();
const client = new Knock();
app.get("/card-issued/approve", async (c) => {
const { messageId } = c.req.query();
if (!messageId) return c.text("No message ID found", { status: 400 });
await client.messages.markAsInteracted(messageId, {
status: "approved",
});
return c.text("Approved");
});
The message interaction will flow from Knock to our worker via the webhook we set up, ensuring that the process is fully asynchronous. The payload of the webhook includes the full message, including metadata about the user that generated the original request, and keeps details about the request itself, which in our case contains the tool call.
import { getAgentByName, routeAgentRequest } from "agents";
import { Hono } from "hono";
const app = new Hono();
app.post("/incoming/knock/webhook", async (c) => {
const body = await c.req.json();
const env = c.env as Env;
// Find the user ID from the tool call for the calling user
const userId = body?.data?.actors[0];
if (!userId) {
return c.text("No user ID found", { status: 400 });
}
// Find the agent DO for the user
const existingAgent = await getAgentByName(env.AIAgent, userId);
if (existingAgent) {
// Route the request to the agent DO to process
const result = await existingAgent.handleIncomingWebhook(body);
return c.json(result);
} else {
return c.text("Not found", { status: 404 });
}
});
We leverage the agent’s ability to be addressed by a named identifier to route the request from the worker to the agent. In our case, that’s the userId. Because the agent is backed by a durable object, this process of going from incoming worker request to finding and resuming the agent is trivial.
Resuming the deferred tool call
We then use the context about the original tool call, passed through to Knock and round tripped back to the agent, to resume the tool execution and issue the card.
export class AIAgent extends AIChatAgent {
// ... other methods
async handleIncomingWebhook(body: any) {
const { toolkit } = await initializeToolkit(this);
const deferredToolCall = toolkit.handleMessageInteraction(body);
if (!deferredToolCall) {
return { error: "No deferred tool call given" };
}
// If we received an "approved" status then we know the call was approved
// so we can resume the deferred tool call execution
if (result.interaction.status === "approved") {
const toolCallResult =
await toolkit.resumeToolExecution(result.toolCall);
const { response } = await generateText({
model: openai("gpt-4o-mini"),
prompt: `You were asked to issue a card for a customer. The card is now approved. The result was: ${JSON.stringify(toolCallResult)}.`,
});
const message = responseToAssistantMessage(
response.messages[0],
result.toolCall,
toolCallResult
);
// Save the message so that it's displayed to the user
this.persistMessages([...this.messages, message]);
}
return { status: "success" };
}
}
Again, there’s a lot going on here, so let’s step through the important parts:
We attempt to transform the body, which is the webhook payload from Knock, into a deferred tool call via the handleMessageInteraction method
If the metadata status we passed through to the interaction call earlier has an “approved” status then we resume the tool call via the resumeToolExecution method
Finally, we generate a message from the LLM and persist it, ensuring that the user is informed of the approved card
With this last piece in place, we can now request a new card be issued, have an approval request be dispatched from the agent, send the approval messages, and route those approvals back to our agent to be processed. The agent will asynchronously process our card issue request and the deferred tool call will be resumed for us, with very little code.
Protecting against duplicate approvals
One issue with the above implementation is that we’re prone to issuing multiple cards if someone clicks on the approve button more than once. To rectify this, we want to keep track of the tool calls being issued, and ensure that the call is processed at most once.
To power this we leverage theagent’s built-in state, which can be used to persist information without reaching for another persistence store like a database or Redis, although we could absolutely do so if we wished. We can track the tool calls by their ID and capture their current status, right inside the agent process.
Here, we create the initial state for the tool calls as an empty object. We also add a quick setter helper method to make interactions easier.
Next up, we need to record the tool call being made. To do so, we can use the onAfterCallKnock option in the requireHumanInput helper to capture that the tool call has been requested for the user.
const { issueCard } = toolkit.requireHumanInput(
{ issueCard: issueCardTool },
{
// Keep track of the tool call state once it's been sent to Knock
onAfterCallKnock: async (toolCall) =>
agent.setToolCallStatus(toolCall.id, "requested"),
// ... as before
}
);
Finally, we then need to check the state when we’re processing the incoming webhook, and mark the tool call as approved (some code omitted for brevity).
export class AIAgent extends AIChatAgent {
async handleIncomingWebhook(body: any) {
const { toolkit } = await initializeToolkit(this);
const deferredToolCall = toolkit.handleMessageInteraction(body);
const toolCallId = result.toolCall.id;
// Make sure this is a tool call that can be processed
if (this.state.toolCalls[toolCallId] !== "requested") {
return { error: "Tool call is not requested" };
}
if (result.interaction.status === "approved") {
const toolCallResult = await toolkit.resumeToolExecution(result.toolCall);
this.setToolCallStatus(toolCallId, "approved");
// ... rest as before
}
}
}
Conclusion
Using the Agents SDK and Knock, it’s easy to build advanced human-in-the-loop experiences that defer tool calls.
Knock’s workflow builder and notification engine gives you building blocks to create sophisticated cross-channel messaging for your agents. You can easily create escalation flows that send messages through SMS, push, email, or Slack that respect the notification preferences of your users. Knock also gives you complete visibility into the messages your users are receiving.
The Durable Object abstraction underneath the Agents SDK means that we get a globally addressable agent process that’s easy to yield and resume back to. The persistent storage in the Durable Object means we can retain the complete chat history per-user, and any other state that’s required in the agent process to resume the agent with (like our tool calls). Finally, the serverless nature of the underlying Durable Object means we’re able to horizontally scale to support a large number of users with no effort.
If you’re looking to build your own AI Agent chat experience with a multiplayer human-in-the-loop experience, you’ll find the complete code from this guideavailable in GitHub.
This is the NVIDIA MGX PCIe Switch Board with ConnectX-8 for 8x PCIe GPU servers, marking the most significant architectural shift in a decade in this segment
This article gives a good rundown of the security risks of Windows Recall, and the repurposed copyright protection took that Signal used to block the AI feature from scraping Signal data.
In what has quickly become a busy week for workstation and server class video cards at this year’s Computex trade show, AMD has become the latest video card vendor to join the fray with the announcement of their flagship Radeon AI PRO R9700 video card. Based on AMD’s newest RDNA 4 GPU architecture, AMD is […]
Recommender systems have become essential components of digital services across e-commerce, streaming media, and social networks [1, 2]. At Netflix, these systems drive significant product and business impact by connecting members with relevant content at the right time [3, 4]. While our recommendation foundation model (FM) has made substantial progress in understanding user preferences through large-scale learning from interaction histories (please refer to this article about FM @ Netflix), there is an opportunity to further enhance its capabilities. By extending FM to incorporate the prediction of underlying user intents, we aim to enrich its understanding of user sessions beyond next-item prediction, thereby offering a more comprehensive and nuanced recommendation experience.
Recent research has highlighted the importance of understanding user intent in online platforms [5, 6, 7, 8]. As Xia et al. [8] demonstrated at Pinterest, predicting a user’s future intent can lead to more accurate and personalized recommendations. However, existing intent prediction approaches typically employ simple multi-task learning that adds intent prediction heads to next-item prediction models without establishing a hierarchical relationship between these tasks.
To address these limitations, we introduce FM-Intent, a novel recommendation model that enhances our foundation model through hierarchical multi-task learning. FM-Intent captures a user’s latent session intent using both short-term and long-term implicit signals as proxies, then leverages this intent prediction to improve next-item recommendations. Unlike conventional approaches, FM-Intent establishes a clear hierarchy where intent predictions directly inform item recommendations, creating a more coherent and effective recommendation pipeline.
FM-Intent makes three key contributions:
A novel recommendation model that captures user intent on the Netflix platform and enhances next-item prediction using this intent information.
A hierarchical multi-task learning approach that effectively models both short-term and long-term user interests.
Comprehensive experimental validation showing significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art models, including our foundation model.
Understanding User Intent in Netflix
In the Netflix ecosystem, user intent manifests through various interaction metadata, as illustrated in Figure 1. FM-Intent leverages these implicit signals to predict both user intent and next-item recommendations.
Figure 1: Overview of user engagement data in Netflix. User intent can be associated with several interaction metadata. We leverage various implicit signals to predict user intent and next-item.
In Netflix, there can be multiple types of user intents. For instance,
Action Type: Categories reflecting what users intend to do on Netflix, such as discovering new content versus continuing previously started content. For example, when a member plays a follow-up episode of something they were already watching, this can be categorized as “continue watching” intent.
Genre Preference: The pre-defined genre labels (e.g., Action, Thriller, Comedy) that indicate a user’s content preferences during a session. These preferences can shift significantly between sessions, even for the same user.
Movie/Show Type: Whether a user is looking for a movie (typically a single, longer viewing experience) or a TV show (potentially multiple episodes of shorter duration).
Time-since-release: Whether the user prefers newly released content, recent content (e.g., between a week and a month), or evergreen catalog titles.
These dimensions serve as proxies for the latent user intent, which is often not directly observable but crucial for providing relevant recommendations.
FM-Intent Model Architecture
FM-Intent employs a hierarchical multi-task learning approach with three major components, as illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2: An architectural illustration of our hierarchical multi-task learning model FM-Intent for user intent and item predictions. We use ground-truth intent and item-ID labels to optimize predictions.
1. Input Feature Sequence Formation
The first component constructs rich input features by combining interaction metadata. The input feature for each interaction combines categorical embeddings and numerical features, creating a comprehensive representation of user behavior.
2. User Intent Prediction
The intent prediction component processes the input feature sequence through a Transformer encoder and generates predictions for multiple intent signals.
The Transformer encoder effectively models the long-term interest of users through multi-head attention mechanisms. For each prediction task, the intent encoding is transformed into prediction scores via fully-connected layers.
A key innovation in FM-Intent is the attention-based aggregation of individual intent predictions. This approach generates a comprehensive intent embedding that captures the relative importance of different intent signals for each user, providing valuable insights for personalization and explanation.
3. Next-Item Prediction with Hierarchical Multi-Task Learning
The final component combines the input features with the user intent embedding to make more accurate next-item recommendations.
FM-Intent employs hierarchical multi-task learning where intent predictions are conducted first, and their results are used as input features for the next-item prediction task. This hierarchical relationship ensures that the next-item recommendations are informed by the predicted user intent, creating a more coherent and effective recommendation model.
Offline Results
We conducted comprehensive offline experiments on sampled Netflix user engagement data to evaluate FM-Intent’s performance. Note that FM-Intent uses a much smaller dataset for training compared to the FM production model due to its complex hierarchical prediction architecture.
Next-Item and Next-Intent Prediction Accuracy
Table 1 compares FM-Intent with several state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models, including our production model (FM-Intent-V0).
Table 1: Next-item and next-intent prediction results of baselines and our proposed method FM-Intent on the Netflix user engagement dataset.
All metrics are represented as relative % improvements compared to the SOTA baseline: TransAct. N/A indicates that a model is not capable of predicting a certain intent. Note that we added additional fully-connected layers to LSTM, GRU, and Transformer baselines in order to predict user intent, while we used original implementations for other baselines. FM-Intent demonstrates statistically significant improvement of 7.4% in next-item prediction accuracy compared to the best baseline (TransAct).
Most baseline models show limited performance as they either cannot predict user intent or cannot incorporate intent predictions into next-item recommendations. Our production model (FM-Intent-V0) performs well but lacks the ability to predict and leverage user intent. Note that FM-Intent-V0 is trained with a smaller dataset for a fair comparison with other models; the actual production model is trained with a much larger dataset.
Qualitative Analysis: User Clustering
Figure 3: K-means++ (K=10) clustering of user intent embeddings found by FM-Intent; FM-Intent finds unique clusters of users that share the similar intent.
FM-Intent generates meaningful user intent embeddings that can be used for clustering users with similar intents. Figure 3 visualizes 10 distinct clusters identified through K-means++ clustering.These clusters reveal meaningful user segments with distinct viewing patterns:
Users who primarily discover new content versus those who continue watching recent/favorite content.
Users with specific viewing patterns (e.g., Rewatchers versus casual viewers).
Potential Applications of FM-Intent
FM-Intent has been successfully integrated into Netflix’s recommendation ecosystem, can be leveraged for several downstream applications:
Personalized UI Optimization: The predicted user intent could inform the layout and content selection on the Netflix homepage, emphasizing different rows based on whether users are in discovery mode, continue-watching mode, or exploring specific genres.
Analytics and User Understanding: Intent embeddings and clusters provide valuable insights into viewing patterns and preferences, informing content acquisition and production decisions.
Enhanced Recommendation Signals: Intent predictions serve as features for other recommendation models, improving their accuracy and relevance.
Search Optimization: Real-time intent predictions help prioritize search results based on the user’s current session intent.
Conclusion
FM-Intent represents an advancement in Netflix’s recommendation capabilities by enhancing them with hierarchical multi-task learning for user intent prediction. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that FM-Intent significantly outperforms state-of-the-art models, including our prior foundation model that focused solely on next-item prediction. By understanding not just what users might watch next but what underlying intents users have, we can provide more personalized, relevant, and satisfying recommendations.
Acknowledgements
We thank our stunning colleagues in the Foundation Model team & AIMS org. for their valuable feedback and discussions. We also thank our partner teams for getting this up and running in production.
References
[1] Amatriain, X., & Basilico, J. (2015). Recommender systems in industry: A netflix case study. In Recommender systems handbook (pp. 385–419). Springer.
[2] Gomez-Uribe, C. A., & Hunt, N. (2015). The netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 6(4), 1–19.
[3] Jannach, D., & Jugovac, M. (2019). Measuring the business value of recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 10(4), 1–23.
[4] Bhattacharya, M., & Lamkhede, S. (2022). Augmenting Netflix Search with In-Session Adapted Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 542–545).
[5] Chen, Y., Liu, Z., Li, J., McAuley, J., & Xiong, C. (2022). Intent contrastive learning for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (pp. 2172–2182).
[6] Ding, Y., Ma, Y., Wong, W. K., & Chua, T. S. (2021). Modeling instant user intent and content-level transition for sequential fashion recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 24, 2687–2700.
[7] Liu, Z., Chen, H., Sun, F., Xie, X., Gao, J., Ding, B., & Shen, Y. (2021). Intent preference decoupling for user representation on online recommender system. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2575–2582).
[8] Xia, X., Eksombatchai, P., Pancha, N., Badani, D. D., Wang, P. W., Gu, N., Joshi, S. V., Farahpour, N., Zhang, Z., & Zhai, A. (2023). TransAct: Transformer-based Realtime User Action Model for Recommendation at Pinterest. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 5249–5259).
I already knew about the declining response rate for polls and surveys. The percentage of AI bots that respond to surveys is also increasing.
Solutions are hard:
1. Make surveys less boring.
We need to move past bland, grid-filled surveys and start designing experiences people actually want to complete. That means mobile-first layouts, shorter runtimes, and maybe even a dash of storytelling. TikTok or dating app style surveys wouldn’t be a bad idea or is that just me being too much Gen Z?
2. Bot detection.
There’s a growing toolkit of ways to spot AI-generated responses—using things like response entropy, writing style patterns or even metadata like keystroke timing. Platforms should start integrating these detection tools more widely. Ideally, you introduce an element that only humans can do, e.g., you have to pick up your price somewhere in-person. Btw, note that these bots can easily be designed to find ways around the most common detection tactics such as Captcha’s, timed responses and postcode and IP recognition. Believe me, way less code than you suspect is needed to do this.
3. Pay people more.
If you’re only offering 50 cents for 10 minutes of mental effort, don’t be surprised when your respondent pool consists of AI agents and sleep-deprived gig workers. Smarter, dynamic incentives—especially for underrepresented groups—can make a big difference. Perhaps pay-differentiation (based on simple demand/supply) makes sense?
4. Rethink the whole model.
Surveys aren’t the only way to understand people. We can also learn from digital traces, behavioral data, or administrative records. Think of it as moving from a single snapshot to a fuller, blended picture. Yes, it’s messier—but it’s also more real.
As part of today’s headline Computex keynote, NVIDIA announced a new member in their suite of NVLink interconnect technologies: NVLink Fusion. And this latest entry may be the most interesting yet, as NVIDIA is taking a big step towards opening up the NVLink ecosystem to third-party CPUs and accelerators, releasing IP and hardware designed to […]
Kicking off today is the annual Computex tradeshow in Taiwan. Home to countless system and device manufacturers, Computex is a cornucopia of consumer electronics, and these days is also the biggest PC-centric show of the year. And even though it takes place in May, barely half-way through the year, the show routinely sets the stage […]
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.