Tag Archives: Vulnerability management

Adapting existing VM programs to regain control

Post Syndicated from Ryan Blanchard original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/10/24/adapting-existing-vm-programs-to-regain-control/

Adapting existing VM programs to regain control

Stop me if you’ve heard this before. The scale, speed and complexity of cloud environments — particularly when you introduce containers and microservices — has made the lives of security professionals immensely harder. While it may seem trite, the reason we keep hearing this refrain is because, unfortunately, it’s true. In case you missed it, we discussed how cloud adoption creates a rapidly expanding attack surface in our last post.

One could argue that no subgroup of security professionals is feeling this pain more than the VM team. From elevated expectations, processes, and tooling to pressured budgets, the scale and complexity has made identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in cloud applications and the infrastructure that supports them a seemingly impossible task. During a recent webinar, Rapid7’s Cindy Stanton (SVP, Product and Customer Marketing) and Peter Scott (VP, Product Marketing) dove into this very subject.

Cindy starts off this section by unpacking why modern cloud environments require a fundamentally different approach to implementing and executing a vulnerability management program. The highly ephemeral nature of cloud resources with upwards of 20% of your infrastructure being spun down and replaced on a daily basis makes maintaining continuous and real-time visibility non-negotiable. Teams are also being tasked with managing exponentially larger environments, often consisting of 10s of thousands of instances at any given moment.



Adapting existing VM programs to regain control

To make matters worse, it doesn’t stop at the technical hurdles. Cindy breaks down how ownership of resources and responsibilities related to addressing vulnerabilities once they’re identified has shifted. With traditional approaches it was typical to have a centralized group (typically IT) that owned and was ultimately responsible for the integrity of all resources. Today, the self-serve and democratized nature of cloud environments has created a dynamic in which it can be extremely difficult to track and identify who owns what resource or workload and who is ultimately responsible to remediate an issue when one arises.



Adapting existing VM programs to regain control

Cindy goes on to outline how drastically remediation processes need to shift when dealing with immutable infrastructure (i.e. containers) and how that also requires a shift in mindset. Instead of playing a game of whack-a-mole in production workloads trying to address vulnerabilities, the use of containers introduces a fundamentally new approach centered around making patches and updates to base images — often referred to as golden images — and then building new workloads from scratch based off of the hardened image rather than updating and retaining the existing workload. As Cindy so eloquently puts it, “the ‘what’ I have to do is relatively unchanged, but the ‘how’ really has to shift to adjust to this different environment.”



Adapting existing VM programs to regain control

Peter follows up Cindy’s assessment of how cloud impacts and forces a fundamentally different approach to VM programs by providing some recommendations and best practices to adapt your program to this new paradigm as well as how to operationalize cloud vulnerability management across your organization. We’ll cover these best practices in our next blog in this series, including shifting your VM program left to catch vulnerabilities earlier on in the development process. We will also discuss enforcing proper tagging strategies and the use of automation to eliminate repetitive tasks and accelerate remediation times. If you’re interested in learning more about Rapid7’s InsightCloudSec solution be sure to check out our bi-weekly demo, which goes live every other Wednesday at 1pm EST. Of course, you can always watch the complete replay of this webinar anytime as well!

Addressing the Evolving Attack Surface Part 1: Modern Challenges

Post Syndicated from Bria Grangard original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/10/17/addressing-the-evolving-attack-surface-part-1-modern-challenges/

Addressing the Evolving Attack Surface Part 1: Modern Challenges

Lately, we’ve been hearing a lot from our customers requesting help on how to manage their evolving attack surface. As new 0days appear, new applications are spun up, and cloud instances change hourly, it can be hard for our customers to get a full view of risk into their environments.

We put together a webinar to chat more about how Rapid7 can help customers meet this challenge with two amazing presenters Cindy Stanton, SVP of Product and Customer Marketing, and Peter Scott, VP of Product Marketing.

At the beginning of this webcast, Cindy highlights where the industry started from traditional vulnerability management (VM) which was heavily focused on infrastructure but has evolved significantly over the last couple of years. Cindy discusses this rapid expansion of the attack surface having been accelerated by remote workforces during the pandemic, convergence of IT and IoT initiatives, modern development of applications leveraging containers and microservices, adoption of the public cloud, and so much more. Today, security teams face the daunting challenge of having so many layers up and down the stack from traditional infrastructure to cloud environments, applications, and beyond.They need a way to understand their full attack surface. Cindy, gives an example of this evolving challenge of increasing resources and complexity of cloud adoption below.



Addressing the Evolving Attack Surface Part 1: Modern Challenges

Cindy then turns things over to Peter Scott to walk us through the many challenges security teams are facing. For example, traditional tools aren’t purpose-built to keep pace with cloud environment, getting complete coverage of assets in your environment requires multiple solutions from different vendors that are all speaking different languages, and no solutions are providing a unified view of an organization’s risk. These challenges on top of growing economic pressures often make security teams choose between continued  investment in traditional infrastructure and applications, or investing more in securing cloud environments. Peter then discusses the challenges security teams face from expanded roles, disjointed security stacks, and increases in the threat landscape. Some of these challenges are highlighted more in the video below.



Addressing the Evolving Attack Surface Part 1: Modern Challenges

After spending some time discussing the challenges organizations and security teams are facing, Cindy and Peter dive deeper into the steps organizations can take to expand their existing VM programs to include cloud environments. We will cover these steps and more in the next blog post of this series. Until then, if you’re curious to learn more about Rapid7’s InsightCloudSec solution feel free to check out the demo here, or watch the replay of this webinar at any time!

Patch Tuesday – October 2022

Post Syndicated from Greg Wiseman original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/10/11/patch-tuesday-october-2022/

Patch Tuesday - October 2022

The October batch of CVEs published by Microsoft includes 96 vulnerabilities, including 12 fixed earlier this month that affect the Chromium project used by their Edge browser.

Top of mind for many this month is whether Microsoft would patch the two Exchange Server zero-day vulnerabilities (CVE-2022-41040 and CVE-2022-41082) disclosed at the end of September. While Microsoft was relatively quick to acknowledge the vulnerabilities and provide mitigation steps, their guidance has continually changed as the recommended rules to block attack traffic get bypassed. This whack-a-mole approach seems likely to continue until a proper patch addressing the root causes is available; unfortunately, it doesn’t look like that will be happening today. Thankfully, the impact should be more limited than 2021’s ProxyShell and ProxyLogon vulnerabilities due to attackers needing to be authenticated to the server for successful exploitation. Reports are also surfacing about an additional zero-day distinct from these being used in ransomware attacks; however, these have not yet been substantiated.

Microsoft did address two other zero-day vulnerabilities with today’s patches. CVE-2022-41033, an Elevation of Privilege vulnerability affecting the COM+ Event System Service in all supported versions of Windows, has been seen exploited in the wild. CVE-2022-41043 is an Information Disclosure vulnerability affecting Office for Mac that was publicly disclosed but not (yet) seen exploited in the wild.

Nine CVEs categorized as Remote Code Execution (RCE) with Critical severity were also patched today – seven of them affect the Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol, and like those fixed last month, require an attacker to win a race condition to exploit them. CVE-2022-38048 affects all supported versions of Office, and CVE-2022-41038 could allow an attacker authenticated to SharePoint to execute arbitrary code on the server, provided the account has “Manage List” permissions.

Maxing out the CVSS base score with a 10.0 this month is CVE-2022-37968, an Elevation of Privilege vulnerability in the Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes cluster Connect component. It’s unclear why Microsoft has assigned such a high score, given that an attacker would need to know the randomly generated external DNS endpoint for an Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes cluster (arguably making the Attack Complexity “High”). That said, if this condition is met then an unauthenticated user could become a cluster admin and potentially gain control over the Kubernetes cluster. Users of Azure Arc and Azure Stack Edge should check whether auto-updates are turned on, and if not, upgrade manually as soon as possible.

Summary charts

Patch Tuesday - October 2022
Patch Tuesday - October 2022
Patch Tuesday - October 2022
Patch Tuesday - October 2022

Summary tables

Azure vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-37968 Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes cluster Connect Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 10 Yes
CVE-2022-38017 StorSimple 8000 Series Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35829 Service Fabric Explorer Spoofing Vulnerability No No 6.2 Yes

Browser vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-41035 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability No No 8.3 Yes
CVE-2022-3373 Chromium: CVE-2022-3373 Out of bounds write in V8 No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3370 Chromium: CVE-2022-3370 Use after free in Custom Elements No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3317 Chromium: CVE-2022-3317 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Intents No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3316 Chromium: CVE-2022-3316 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Safe Browsing No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3315 Chromium: CVE-2022-3315 Type confusion in Blink No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3313 Chromium: CVE-2022-3313 Incorrect security UI in Full Screen No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3311 Chromium: CVE-2022-3311 Use after free in Import No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3310 Chromium: CVE-2022-3310 Insufficient policy enforcement in Custom Tabs No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3308 Chromium: CVE-2022-3308 Insufficient policy enforcement in Developer Tools No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3307 Chromium: CVE-2022-3307 Use after free in Media No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3304 Chromium: CVE-2022-3304 Use after free in CSS No No N/A Yes

Developer Tools vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-41034 Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-41083 Visual Studio Code Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-41032 NuGet Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-41042 Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 7.4 Yes

Microsoft Office vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-41038 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-41036 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-41037 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38053 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-41031 Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38048 Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38049 Microsoft Office Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38001 Microsoft Office Spoofing Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-41043 Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability No Yes 3.3 Yes

System Center vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-37971 Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes

Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-38016 Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38045 Server Service Remote Protocol Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37984 Windows WLAN Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38003 Windows Resilient File System Elevation of Privilege No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38028 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38039 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37995 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37979 Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37970 Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37980 Windows DHCP Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38050 Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37983 Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37998 Windows Local Session Manager (LSM) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.7 Yes
CVE-2022-37973 Windows Local Session Manager (LSM) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.7 Yes
CVE-2022-38036 Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-38027 Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-38021 Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-37974 Windows Mixed Reality Developer Tools Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-38046 Web Account Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.2 Yes
CVE-2022-37965 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 5.9 Yes
CVE-2022-37996 Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-38025 Windows Distributed File System (DFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-38030 Windows USB Serial Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 4.3 Yes

Windows ESU vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-37982 Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38031 Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38040 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37976 Active Directory Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30198 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-22035 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-24504 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-33634 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-38047 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-38000 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-41081 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-37986 Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37988 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38037 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38038 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37990 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37991 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37999 Windows Group Policy Preference Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37993 Windows Group Policy Preference Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37994 Windows Group Policy Preference Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37975 Windows Group Policy Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38051 Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37997 Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-33635 Windows GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37987 Windows Client Server Run-time Subsystem (CSRSS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37989 Windows Client Server Run-time Subsystem (CSRSS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-41033 Windows COM+ Event System Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability Yes No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38044 Windows CD-ROM File System Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-33645 Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-38041 Windows Secure Channel Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-34689 Windows CryptoAPI Spoofing Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-37978 Windows Active Directory Certificate Services Security Feature Bypass No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-38042 Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes
CVE-2022-38029 Windows ALPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-38033 Windows Server Remotely Accessible Registry Keys Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35770 Windows NTLM Spoofing Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-37977 Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 6.5 No
CVE-2022-38032 Windows Portable Device Enumerator Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 5.9 Yes
CVE-2022-38043 Windows Security Support Provider Interface Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-37985 Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-38026 Windows DHCP Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-38034 Windows Workstation Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.3 Yes
CVE-2022-37981 Windows Event Logging Service Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 4.3 Yes
CVE-2022-38022 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 2.5 Yes

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q3 2022 in Review

Post Syndicated from Roshnee Mistry Shah original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/09/28/whats-new-in-insightvm-and-nexpose-q3-2022-in-review/

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q3 2022 in Review

Another quarter comes to a close! While we definitely had our share of summer fun, our team continued to invest in the product, releasing features and updates like recurring coverage for enterprise technologies, performance enhancements, and more. Let’s take a look at some of the key releases in InsightVM and Nexpose from Q3.

[InsightVM and Nexpose] Recurring coverage for VMware vCenter

Recurring coverage provides ongoing, automatic vulnerability coverage for popular enterprise technology and systems. We recently added VMware vCenter to our list.

VMware vCenter Server is a centralized management platform used to manage virtual machines, ESXi hosts, and dependent components from a single host. Last year, vCenter was a significant target for bad actors and became the subject of a number of zero-days. Rapid7 provided ad hoc coverage to protect you against the vulnerabilities. Now, recurring coverage ensures fast, comprehensive protection that provides offensive and defensive security against vCenter vulnerabilities as they arise.

[InsightVM and Nexpose] Tune Assistant

The Security Console in InsightVM and Nexpose contains components that benefit from performance tuning. Tune Assistant is a built-in feature that will calculate performance tuning values based on resources allocated to the Security Console server, then automatically apply those values.

Tuning is calculated and applied to all new consoles when the product first starts up, and customers experiencing performance issues on existing consoles can now easily increase their own resources. For more information, read our docs page on configuring maximum performance in an enterprise environment.

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q3 2022 in Review

[InsightVM and Nexpose] Windows Server 2022 Support

We want to ensure InsightVM and Nexpose are supported on business-critical technologies and operating systems. We added Windows Server 2022, the latest operating system for servers from Microsoft, to our list. The Scan Engine and Security Console can be installed and will be supported by Rapid7 on Windows Server 2022. Learn more about the systems we support.

[InsightVM and Nexpose] Checks for notable vulnerabilities

With exploitation of major vulnerabilities in Mitel MiVoice Connect, multiple Confluence applications, and other popular solutions, the threat actors definitely did not take it easy this summer. InsightVM and Nexpose customers can assess their exposure to many of these CVEs for vulnerability checks, including:

  • Mitel MiVoice Connect Service Appliance | CVE-2022-29499: An onsite VoIP business phone system, MiVoice Connect had a data validation vulnerability, which arose from insufficient data validation for a diagnostic script. The vulnerability potentially allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to send specially crafted requests to inject commands and achieve remote code execution. Learn more about the vulnerability and our response.
  • “Questions” add-on for Confluence Application | CVE-2022-26138: This vulnerability affected “Questions,” an add-on for the Confluence application. It was quickly exploited in the wild once the hardcoded password was released on social media. Learn more about the vulnerability and our response.
  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Zimbra Collaboration Suite: Zimbra, a business productivity suite, was affected by five different vulnerabilities, one of which was unpatched, and four of which were being actively and widely exploited in the wild by well-organized threat actors. Learn more about the vulnerability and our response.
  • CVE-2022-30333
  • CVE-2022-27924
  • CVE-2022-27925
  • CVE-2022-37042
  • CVE-2022-37393

We were hard at work this summer making improvements and increasing the level of protections against attackers for our customers. As we head into the fall and the fourth quarter of the year, you can bet we will continue to make InsightVM the best and most comprehensive risk management platform available. Stay tuned for more great things, and have a happy autumn.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

The 2022 SANS Top New Attacks and Threats Report Is In, and It’s Required Reading

Post Syndicated from Tom Caiazza original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/09/14/the-2022-sans-top-new-attacks-and-threats-report-is-in-and-its-required-reading/

The 2022 SANS Top New Attacks and Threats Report Is In, and It's Required Reading

The latest Top New Attacks and Threat Report from the cybersecurity experts at SANS is here — and the findings around cyberthreats, attacks, and best practices to defend against them are as critical for security teams as they’ve ever been.

If you’re unfamiliar with the SysAdmin, Audit, Network, and Security Institute, or SANS, they’re among the leading cybersecurity research organizations in the world, and their annual Top New Attacks and Threat Report is required reading for every security professional operating today.

What’s new for 2022

This year’s report is a little different from previous years. Rather than focusing on threat statistics from the year before (i.e., 2021 data for the 2022 report), SANS opted to focus on data from the first quarter of 2022, providing a more recent snapshot of the state of play in the threat landscape. The reason for this is probably something you could have guessed: the pandemic.

Typically, the TNAT report (we love coming up with acronyms!) is built out of a highly anticipated presentation from SANS experts at the annual RSA conference. Since the pandemic delayed the start of the RSA event this year, the folks at SANS thought it better to focus on more up-to-the-minute data for their report.

What they found is interesting — if a little concerning.

Smaller breaches, bigger risks?

In the first quarter of 2022, the average breach size was down one-third from the overall breach size in 2021 (even adjusted for seasonal shifts in breach sizes). What’s more, there are signs of a trend in breach size decline, as 2021’s overall breach size average was 5% lower than that of 2020. SANS believes this is indicative of attackers focusing on smaller targets than in previous years, particularly in the healthcare sector and in state and local government agencies.

A lower average breach size is good news, no doubt, but what it says about the intentions of attackers should have many on edge. Going after smaller — but potentially more vulnerable — organizations means those groups are less likely to have the resources to repel those attackers that larger groups would, and they pose dangers as partner organizations.

The SANS experts suggest shoring up supplier compliance by following two well-established security frameworks: the Supply Chain Risk Management Reporting Framework provided by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST’s) updated SP 800-161 Supply Chain Risk Framework.

The SANS report also provided telling and important data around the ways in which attackers enter your environment (phishing was the root of 51% of all breaches), as well as the success rate of multi-factor authentication — 99% — in combating phishing attacks.

The RSA panel discussion (and the subsequent report we’re sharing) also look into specific trends and best practices from some of SANS’s experts. In years past, they’ve looked at some key takeaways from the SolarWinds breach, ransomware, and machine learning vulnerabilities. This year, they’ve turned their attention to multi-factor authentication, stalkerware, and the evolution of “living off the land” attacks as they pertain to cloud infrastructure. Each of these sections is worth reading in its own right and can provide some thought-provoking resources as your security team continues to grapple with what comes next in the cloud and attacker spaces.

One space where the SANS experts chose to focus has particular importance to those seeking to mitigate ransomware: attacks on backups. Backups have long been considered your best defense against ransomware attacks because they allow your organization to securely resume use of your data should your environment become compromised (and your data be locked down). However, as backup infrastructure moves into the cloud, SANS experts believe unique attacks against these backups will become more common, because backup solutions are often quite complex and are vulnerable to specific types of threats, such as living-off-the-land attacks.

The annual SANS report is a reliable and instrumental resource for security teams which is why we are proud to be a sponsor of it (and offer it to the security community). You can dive into the full report here.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Patch Tuesday – September 2022

Post Syndicated from Greg Wiseman original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/09/13/patch-tuesday-september-2022/

Patch Tuesday - September 2022

This month’s Patch Tuesday is on the lighter side, with 79 CVEs being fixed by Microsoft (including 16 CVEs affecting Chromium, used by their Edge browser, that were already available). One zero-day was announced: CVE-2022-37969 is an elevation of privilege vulnerability affecting the Log File System Driver in all supported versions of Windows, allowing attackers to gain SYSTEM-level access on an asset they’ve already got an initial foothold in. Interestingly, Microsoft credits four separate researchers/organizations for independently reporting this, which may be indicative of relatively widespread exploitation. Also previously disclosed (in March), though less useful to attackers, Microsoft has released a fix for CVE-2022-23960 (aka Spectre-BHB) for Windows 11 on ARM64.

Some of the more noteworthy vulnerabilities this month affect Windows systems with IPSec enabled. CVE-2022-34718 allows remote code execution (RCE) on any Windows system reachable via IPv6; CVE-2022-34721 and CVE-2022-34722 are RCE vulnerabilities in the Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol Extensions. All three CVEs are ranked Critical and carry a CVSSv3 base score of 9.8. Rounding out the Critical RCEs this month are CVE-2022-35805 and CVE-2022-34700, both of which affect Microsoft Dynamics (on-premise) and have a CVSSv3 base score of 8.8. Any such systems should be updated immediately.

SharePoint administrators should also be aware of four separate RCEs being addressed this month. They’re ranked Important, meaning Microsoft recommends applying the updates at the earliest opportunity. Finally, a large swath of CVEs affecting OLE DB Provider for SQL Server and the Microsoft ODBC Driver were also fixed. These require some social engineering to exploit, by convincing a user to either connect to a malicious SQL Server or open a maliciously crafted .mdb (Access) file.

Summary charts

Patch Tuesday - September 2022
Patch Tuesday - September 2022
Patch Tuesday - September 2022
Patch Tuesday - September 2022

Summary tables

Azure vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-38007 Azure Guest Configuration and Azure Arc-enabled servers Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

Browser vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-38012 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.7 Yes
CVE-2022-3075 Chromium: CVE-2022-3075 Insufficient data validation in Mojo No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3058 Chromium: CVE-2022-3058 Use after free in Sign-In Flow No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3057 Chromium: CVE-2022-3057 Inappropriate implementation in iframe Sandbox No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3056 Chromium: CVE-2022-3056 Insufficient policy enforcement in Content Security Policy No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3055 Chromium: CVE-2022-3055 Use after free in Passwords No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3054 Chromium: CVE-2022-3054 Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3053 Chromium: CVE-2022-3053 Inappropriate implementation in Pointer Lock No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3047 Chromium: CVE-2022-3047 Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions API No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3046 Chromium: CVE-2022-3046 Use after free in Browser Tag No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3045 Chromium: CVE-2022-3045 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in V8 No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3044 Chromium: CVE-2022-3044 Inappropriate implementation in Site Isolation No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3041 Chromium: CVE-2022-3041 Use after free in WebSQL No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3040 Chromium: CVE-2022-3040 Use after free in Layout No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3039 Chromium: CVE-2022-3039 Use after free in WebSQL No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-3038 Chromium: CVE-2022-3038 Use after free in Network Service No No N/A Yes

Developer Tools vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-26929 .NET Framework Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38013 .NET Core and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-38020 Visual Studio Code Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes

ESU vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-37964 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No

Microsoft Dynamics vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-35805 Microsoft Dynamics CRM (on-premises) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34700 Microsoft Dynamics CRM (on-premises) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes

Microsoft Office vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-38008 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38009 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37961 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35823 Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-37962 Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38010 Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37963 Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

System Center vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-35828 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-35841 Windows Enterprise App Management Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30196 Windows Secure Channel Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 8.2 Yes
CVE-2022-37957 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37954 DirectX Graphics Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38019 AV1 Video Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35838 HTTP V3 Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-38011 Raw Image Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes
CVE-2022-26928 Windows Photo Import API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-34725 Windows ALPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-37959 Network Device Enrollment Service (NDES) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35831 Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34723 Windows DPAPI (Data Protection Application Programming Interface) Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-23960 Arm: CVE-2022-23960 Cache Speculation Restriction Vulnerability No Yes N/A Yes

Windows ESU vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-34718 Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34721 Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34722 Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35834 Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35835 Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35836 Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35840 Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34731 Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34733 Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34726 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34727 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34730 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34732 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34734 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-33679 Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-33647 Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-35830 Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-38005 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30200 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37956 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37955 Windows Group Policy Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34729 Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-38004 Windows Fax Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34719 Windows Distributed File System (DFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-37969 Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability Yes Yes 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35803 Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35833 Windows Secure Channel Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-34720 Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Extension Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-34724 Windows DNS Server Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-37958 SPNEGO Extended Negotiation (NEGOEX) Security Mechanism Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30170 Windows Credential Roaming Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes
CVE-2022-38006 Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34728 Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35832 Windows Event Tracing Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 5.5 No
CVE-2022-35837 Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5 Yes

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

InsightVM: Best Practices to Improve Your Console

Post Syndicated from Shane Queeney original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/09/12/insightvm-best-practices-to-improve-your-console/

InsightVM: Best Practices to Improve Your Console

Over the years, our recommendations and best practices for the InsightVM console have changed with the improvements and updates we’ve made to the system. Here are some of the most common improvements to help you get the most out of your InsightVM console in 2022.

Ensure everything is up to date

The first step to ensuring the health of your console is ensuring it is up to date. For InsightVM product updates, the typical release schedule is weekly on Wednesday, with the occasional out-of-band update. To stay on the latest version, you can set the update frequency to every 24 hours and set it to off-hours to perform that check. This will ensure the latest update is being applied and the console isn’t rebooting in the middle of the workday.

The InsightVM content updates include new vulnerabilities updated every 2 hours. As these don’t require a system reboot, it is recommended to leave them set to automatically update.

Make sure your scan engines are properly updated as well. As long as the scan engine has enough storage space and can reach the InsightVM console, it should be able to receive the latest update.

Unless you are on a Rapid7-hosted console, you are also in charge of updating the underlying operating system. That means not just applying the latest security patch, but also making sure the OS version itself is not end-of-life.

Lastly, you want to make sure you’re running the latest version of the InsightVM postgreSQL database — version 11.7. If you are still running version 9.4, this can cause some potential issues with the database, as well as general slowdown in the console and running reports.

With the latest InsightVM product updates, we also have a database auto-tune feature which automatically tunes based on the amount of RAM on the console server. This feature does not work if you are still on version 9.4. If you are on version 11.7, to activate it, go to Administration -> Run and then run the command tune assistant to make sure everything is tuned correctly. This will have a greater impact if you have 64GB RAM or above.

Check out this doc on tuning the PostgreSQL database for more detail. If you don’t feel comfortable tuning your own database, you can always contact Rapid7 support for assistance.

Reduce the number of sites

One of the largest improvements to the console is the increase in scan efficiency. Before October 2020, the discovery portion of the scan would only hit 1,024 assets simultaneously. Now, we are running discovery against 65,535 IPs at once. This leads to much faster discovery of larger IP ranges. Because of this, we recommend having fewer sites with larger IP scopes, such as /16 or /8 CIDR ranges.

The best way to organize these new, larger sites is based around function or geographical region – for example, having a separate site for all stores and one for all corporate ranges. Another example would be to break up the sites based on continents, or as large of a geographical region as possible.

Having fewer sites with a larger scope will help reduce the micromanagement of schedules and allow for ease of scalability when scanning more devices. For granular reporting, use asset groups, which are much more flexible than IP ranges and are designed to let you set the scope for reports and access management.

Prevent scan overlap

Besides having too many sites, the next-largest problem most consoles face is when scans overlap on the same scan engine. Having fewer sites helps with having fewer scheduled scans, but you should still be aware what scan engine is being used for those sites. Running a scan uses up RAM on the scan engine, and having too many scans running at once can cause scan slowdown or potentially engine crashes due to lack of memory.

The best-case scenario is to have one scan engine per site. That way, your sites can be scanned at the same time without any chance of them overloading a single engine. If you have some sites or locations that are much larger than others, you can always deploy more engines to that location and pool them together for even greater scan efficiency.

And remember, if you’re scanning more than 2,000 devices or have a segmented network, you should not be using the local scan engine, as that takes away resources from the console and PostgreSQL database.

Optimize scan templates

After making sure your scans aren’t overlapping on the same engine, the next step is to speed up the scans by optimizing your scan template. My colleague Landon Dalke wrote a great blog post documenting the best practices for your scan templates. Here are a few highlights from his post:

Assets scanned simultaneously per scan engine: Please use the following table for reference depending on how much CPU and RAM your scan engines have. Make sure your engines have a 1:4 ratio of CPU to memory for the best performance. Also, if your scan engines are virtual, make sure to reserve the allocated memory to avoid insufficient memory issues.

InsightVM: Best Practices to Improve Your Console

Send UDP packets to ports: We recommend disabling. It’s unlikely a device will be reachable that doesn’t respond to ICMP, ARP, or TCP but is somehow found only using UDP.

Do not treat TCP reset responses as live assets: We recommend enabling. This will help prevent “ghost assets” with no hostname or operating system from appearing, as some routers or IDS/IPS send TCP reset responses.

Nmap Services Detection: We recommend disabling this, as it can cause scans to take five to 10 times longer to run. Having a credential or agent on a device gives the same information.

Skip checks performed by the Insight Agent: We recommend enabling. If the agent is detected on a device, it will skip the vulnerability checks the agent is already performing, reducing scan time.

If all of your scan engines have the same resources, you can get away with needing one optimized scan template, reducing potential confusion and further simplifying your scan configurations.

After following these steps, your console should be in a much better place to reduce micromanagement and improve overall efficiency. If you need continued help and support, don’t hesitate to reach out to Rapid7 Support or your Customer Success Manager.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

Post Syndicated from John Hartman original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/09/06/5-steps-for-dealing-with-unknown-environments-in-insightvm/

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

Trying to deal with a large network can be difficult. All too often, engineers and admins don’t know the full scope of their environment and have trouble defining the actual subnets and the systems that exist on those subnets. They know of a couple /24 subnets here or there, but it’s very possible they’re missing a few. Once you get over a couple thousand assets, it can get fairly unruly pretty quick. Different teams own different servers and different network ranges. With regards to InsightVM, how do you know what sites create if you don’t even know what you own?

Luckily, in InsightVM, we can use a little bit of SQL, an overarching site with a ping sweep, and a nifty little tag to help get a handle on things – all outside any third-party software or  other management tools you may acquire to help you wrangle in your IP space. This method in InsightVM lets you find all live assets and identify all network spaces being used in your environment. Then, we can correlate this list against our known subnets and begin building out defined sites for scanning. As we create our known sites, we can start whittling down the number of unknown or undefined subnets.

1. Ping Sweep template

The first step is to create a new scan template dedicated solely to a ping sweep. This template isn’t scanning for any other services or ports, fingerprinting, or performing any other action –  it is simply sending pings to see what is alive. If we get a response back, we assume there is a live asset there, and this will help build out our known networks.

Create your template using these screenshots as guidance. Note that pretty much everything is off except ICMP and ARP pings, and we’re not treating TCP resets as live assets (we don’t want firewalls throwing us off). This scan should take just a few minutes to complete, as it’s not doing all the other functions that a typical scan can do.

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

2. Overarching site

The second step in this process is to create an overarching site. Give it a simple name like “Full Network” or whatever floats your boat. What’s important is that, within this site, you define as large of a network range as you know of. Think /16 here, or even a couple /16 networks. I don’t know your network, so use your judgment as to what you think exists. The idea is to be as broad as possible.

Now, within this site, set the default scan template as your “.Ping Sweep” template, as in my example above. Set your default scan engine or pool, and then save and scan.

What you should get back now is a full list of every live IP that exists within the defined network. If your defined network includes all the possible IP space, and we are assuming that all assets are online and able to respond, then you should have a pretty robust list of found assets.

3. Known Networks report

The next step is to go to the Reports tab and create a SQL Query Export. Throw the following SQL query in the definition, and scope the query from the GUI to your “Full Network” site.

WITH a AS (
SELECT
asset_id,
CONCAT(split_part(ip_address,'.',1),'.',split_part(ip_address,'.',2),'.',split_part(ip_address,'.',3),'.0/24') AS Network
FROM dim_asset
)
 
SELECT DISTINCT Network
FROM a
ORDER BY Network ASC

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

Save and run this report, and you will get a CSV output of all the /24 networks that have at least one live IP in them. You can use this CSV to compare to your known list of networks and start defining the actual sites within your environment. For example, if this report lists out 10.0.0.0/24 and you know that network as your main corporate server’s VLAN, then you can include that network into a separate site for vulnerability scanning.

4. Dynamic tagging

Now that we’ve started defining our known networks into sites, we need to create a dynamic tag that gets applied to all assets within any site. Now, in my example, I exclude the Rapid7 Insight Agents site, because depending on your environment and whether people are working from home, the Insight Agent may report the IP of their computer when logged onto their home network. We obviously can’t scan home networks, so we want to exclude this site to deter any of that bad data.

Create a dynamic tag with several lines to include each site. Note that if your site structure is large enough that you have hundreds of sites, you may want to use the API for this part, but we won’t go into that here – that’s a whole other conversation.

In my example below, I only have four sites – keep in mind I did not select the Rapid7 Insight Agents or my Full Network site. Make sure the operator is set to match ANY of the specified filters. Apply a tag called “Defined Network” to this criteria to tag all assets within a defined site.

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

You could also optionally create a secondary tag for “Undefined Networks,” but it’s not exactly necessary for this process. The below query would get you the Undefined Network assets. Basically, the query is just looking for any assets that don’t have the Defined Network tag and are not in the Rapid7 Insight Agents sites.

5 Steps for Dealing With Unknown Environments in InsightVM

5. Undefined Networks report

Now, we can set up our secondary SQL report to show us all networks that are not defined within the scope of a site. Once again, go to the Reports tab, create a SQL Query Export report, and throw this query into the definition.

WITH a AS (
SELECT
asset_id,
CONCAT(split_part(ip_address,'.',1),'.',split_part(ip_address,'.',2),'.',split_part(ip_address,'.',3),'.0/24') AS Network
FROM dim_asset
)
 
SELECT DISTINCT Network
FROM a
 
WHERE a.asset_id NOT IN (
SELECT DISTINCT asset_id
FROM dim_asset
LEFT JOIN dim_tag_asset USING (asset_id)
LEFT JOIN dim_tag USING (tag_id)
WHERE tag_name = 'Defined Network'
)
 
ORDER BY Network ASC

Save and run this report, and you will get a new CSV that lists out all /24 networks where there was at least one live asset found but the assets are within a /24 that has not been defined within the scope of a created site. You can use this CSV to work your way through those networks to determine what they are and who owns them and then ensure they are included in future or current sites.

Large environments with unknown network components can be difficult to manage and monitor for vulnerabilities. These five steps in InsightVM help make the process easier and more intuitive, so you can maintain better oversight and a stronger security posture within your environment.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Patch Tuesday – August 2022

Post Syndicated from Greg Wiseman original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/08/09/patch-tuesday-august-2022/

Patch Tuesday - August 2022

It’s the week of Hacker Summer Camp in Las Vegas, and Microsoft has published fixes for 141 separate vulnerabilities in their swath of August updates. This is a new monthly record by raw CVE count, but from a patching perspective, the numbers are slightly less dire. 20 CVEs affect their Chromium-based Edge browser, and 34 affect Azure Site Recovery (up from 32 CVEs affecting that product last month). As usual, OS-level updates will address a lot of these, but note that some extra configuration is required to fully protect Exchange Server this month.

There is one 0-day being patched this month. CVE-2022-34713 is a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting the Microsoft Windows Support Diagnostic Tool (MSDT) – it carries a CVSSv3 base score of 7.8, as it requires convincing a potential victim to open a malicious file. The advisory indicates that this CVE is a variant of the “Dogwalk” vulnerability, which made news alongside Follina (CVE-2022-30190) back in May.

Publicly disclosed, but not (yet) exploited is CVE-2022-30134, an Information Disclosure vulnerability affecting Exchange Server. In this case, simply patching is not sufficient to protect against attackers being able to read targeted email messages. Administrators should enable Extended Protection in order to fully remediate this vulnerability, as well as the five other vulnerabilities affecting Exchange this month. Details about how to accomplish this are available via the Exchange Blog.

Microsoft also patched several flaws affecting Remote Access Server (RAS). The most severe of these (CVE-2022-30133 and CVE-2022-35744) are related to Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol and could allow RCE simply by sending a malicious connection request to a server. Seven CVEs affecting the Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) on RAS were also fixed this month: six RCEs and one Denial of Service. If you have RAS in your environment but are unable to patch immediately, consider blocking traffic on port 1723 from your network.

Vulnerabilities affecting Windows Network File System (NFS) have been trending in recent months, and today sees Microsoft patching CVE-2022-34715 (RCE, CVSS 9.8) affecting NFSv4.1 on Windows Server 2022.

This is the worst of it. One last vulnerability to highlight: CVE-2022-35797 is a Security Feature Bypass in Windows Hello – Microsoft’s biometric authentication mechanism for Windows 10. Successful exploitation requires physical access to a system, but would allow an attacker to bypass a facial recognition check.

Summary charts

Patch Tuesday - August 2022
Patch Tuesday - August 2022
Patch Tuesday - August 2022
Patch Tuesday - August 2022

Summary tables

Azure vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-35802 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-30175 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30176 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34687 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35773 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35779 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35806 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35772 Azure Site Recovery Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.2 Yes
CVE-2022-35824 Azure Site Recovery Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.2 Yes
CVE-2022-33646 Azure Batch Node Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-35780 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35781 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35799 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35775 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35801 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35807 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35808 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35782 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35809 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35784 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35810 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35811 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35785 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35786 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35813 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35788 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35814 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35789 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35815 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35790 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35816 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35817 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35791 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35818 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35819 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35776 Azure Site Recovery Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 6.2 Yes
CVE-2022-34685 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34686 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35774 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-35800 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-35787 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-35821 Azure Sphere Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 4.4 Yes
CVE-2022-35783 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.4 Yes
CVE-2022-35812 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.4 Yes

Browser vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-33649 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 9.6 Yes
CVE-2022-33636 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.3 Yes
CVE-2022-35796 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-2624 Chromium: CVE-2022-2624 Heap buffer overflow in PDF No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2623 Chromium: CVE-2022-2623 Use after free in Offline No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2622 Chromium: CVE-2022-2622 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Safe Browsing No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2621 Chromium: CVE-2022-2621 Use after free in Extensions No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2619 Chromium: CVE-2022-2619 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Settings No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2618 Chromium: CVE-2022-2618 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Internals No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2617 Chromium: CVE-2022-2617 Use after free in Extensions API No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2616 Chromium: CVE-2022-2616 Inappropriate implementation in Extensions API No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2615 Chromium: CVE-2022-2615 Insufficient policy enforcement in Cookies No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2614 Chromium: CVE-2022-2614 Use after free in Sign-In Flow No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2612 Chromium: CVE-2022-2612 Side-channel information leakage in Keyboard input No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2611 Chromium: CVE-2022-2611 Inappropriate implementation in Fullscreen API No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2610 Chromium: CVE-2022-2610 Insufficient policy enforcement in Background Fetch No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2606 Chromium: CVE-2022-2606 Use after free in Managed devices API No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2605 Chromium: CVE-2022-2605 Out of bounds read in Dawn No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2604 Chromium: CVE-2022-2604 Use after free in Safe Browsing No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2603 Chromium: CVE-2022-2603 Use after free in Omnibox No No N/A Yes

Developer Tools vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-35777 Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35825 Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35826 Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35827 Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34716 .NET Spoofing Vulnerability No No 5.9 Yes

ESU Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30133 Windows Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35744 Windows Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34691 Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34714 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-35745 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-35752 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-35753 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-34702 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-35767 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-34706 Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34707 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35768 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35756 Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35751 Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35795 Windows Error Reporting Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35820 Windows Bluetooth Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35750 Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34713 Microsoft Windows Support Diagnostic Tool (MSDT) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Yes Yes 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35743 Microsoft Windows Support Diagnostic Tool (MSDT) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35760 Microsoft ATA Port Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30194 Windows WebBrowser Control Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35769 Windows Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-35793 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes
CVE-2022-34690 Windows Fax Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes
CVE-2022-35759 Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 6.5 No
CVE-2022-35747 Windows Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 5.9 Yes
CVE-2022-35758 Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34708 Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34701 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 5.3 No

Exchange Server vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-21980 Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8 Yes
CVE-2022-24516 Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8 Yes
CVE-2022-24477 Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8 Yes
CVE-2022-30134 Microsoft Exchange Information Disclosure Vulnerability No Yes 7.6 Yes
CVE-2022-34692 Microsoft Exchange Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.3 Yes
CVE-2022-21979 Microsoft Exchange Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 4.8 Yes

Microsoft Office vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-34717 Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-33648 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35742 Microsoft Outlook Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33631 Microsoft Excel Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes

System Center Azure vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-33640 System Center Operations Manager: Open Management Infrastructure (OMI) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-34715 Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35804 SMB Client and Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35761 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.4 Yes
CVE-2022-35766 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-35794 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-34699 Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-33670 Windows Partition Management Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34703 Windows Partition Management Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34696 Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35746 Windows Digital Media Receiver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35749 Windows Digital Media Receiver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-34705 Windows Defender Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35771 Windows Defender Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35762 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35763 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35764 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35765 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-35792 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30144 Windows Bluetooth Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35748 HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-35755 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes
CVE-2022-35757 Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes
CVE-2022-35754 Unified Write Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.7 Yes
CVE-2022-35797 Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 6.1 Yes
CVE-2022-34709 Windows Defender Credential Guard Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 6 Yes
CVE-2022-30197 Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34710 Windows Defender Credential Guard Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34712 Windows Defender Credential Guard Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34704 Windows Defender Credential Guard Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-34303 CERT/CC: CVE-20220-34303 Crypto Pro Boot Loader Bypass No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-34302 CERT/CC: CVE-2022-34302 New Horizon Data Systems Inc Boot Loader Bypass No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-34301 CERT/CC: CVE-2022-34301 Eurosoft Boot Loader Bypass No No N/A Yes

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q2 2022 in Review

Post Syndicated from Randi Whitcomb original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/07/28/whats-new-in-insightvm-and-nexpose-q2-2022-in-review/

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q2 2022 in Review

The Vulnerability Management team kicked off Q2 by remediating the instances of Spring4Shell (CVE-2022-22965) and Spring Cloud (CVE-2022-22963) vulnerabilities that impacted cybersecurity teams worldwide. We also made several investments to both InsightVM and Nexpose throughout the second quarter that will help improve and better automate vulnerability management for your organization. Let’s dive in!

New dashboard cards based on CVSS v3 Severity (InsightVM)

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is an open standard for scoring the severity of vulnerabilities; it’s a key metric that organizations use to prioritize risk in their environments. To empower organizations with tools to do this more effectively, we recently duplicated seven CVSS dashboard cards in InsightVM to include a version that sorts the vulnerabilities based on CVSS v3 scores.The v3 CVSS system made some changes to both quantitative and qualitative scores. For example, Log4Shell had a score of 9.3 (high) in v2 and a 10 (critical) in v3.

Having both V2 and V3 version dashboards available allows you to prioritize and sort vulnerabilities according to your chosen methodology. Security is not one-size-fits all, and the CVSS v2 scoring might provide more accurate vulnerability prioritization for some customers. InsightVM allows customers to choose whether v2 or v3 scoring is a better option for their organizations’ unique needs.  

The seven cards now available for CVSS v3 are:

  • Exploitable Vulnerabilities by CVSS Score
  • Exploitable Vulnerability Discovery Date by CVSS Score
  • Exploitable Vulnerability Publish Age by CVSS Score
  • Vulnerability Count By CVSS Score Over Time
  • Vulnerabilities by CVSS Score
  • Vulnerability Discovery Date by CVSS Score
  • Vulnerability Publish Age by CVSS Score
What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q2 2022 in Review

Asset correlation for Citrix VDI instances (InsightVM)

You asked, and we listened. By popular demand, InsightVM can now identify agent-based assets that are Citrix VDI instances and correlate them to the user, enabling more accurate asset/instance tagging.

Previously, when a user started a non-persistent VDI, it created a new AgentID, which then created a new asset in the console and consumed a user license. The InsightVM team is excited to bring this solution to our customers for this widely persistent problem.

Through the Improved Agent experience for Citrix VDI instances, when User X logs into their daily virtual desktop, it will automatically correlate to User’s experience, maintain the asset history, and consume only one license. The result is a smoother, more streamlined experience for organizations that deploy and scan Citrix VDI.

Scan Assistant made even easier to manage (Nexpose and InsightVM)

In December 2021, we launched Scan Assistant, a lightweight service deployed on an asset that uses digital certificates for handshake instead of account-based credentials; This alleviates the credential management headaches VM teams often encounter. The Scan Assistant is also designed to drive improved vulnerability scanning performance in both InsightVM and Nexpose, with faster completion times for both vulnerability and policy scans.

We recently released Scan Assistant 1.1.0, which automates Scan Assistant software updates and digital certificate rotation for customers seeking to deploy and maintain a fleet of Scan Assistants. This new automation improves security – digital certificates are more difficult to compromise than credentials – and simplifies administration for organizations by enabling them to centrally manage features from the Security Console.

Currently, these enhancements are only available on Windows OS. To opt into automated Scan Assistant software updates and/or digital certificate rotation, please visit the Scan Assistant tab in the Scan Template.

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q2 2022 in Review

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q2 2022 in Review

Recurring coverage (Nexpose and InsightVM)

Rapid7 is committed to providing ongoing monitoring and coverage for a number of software products and services. The Vulnerability Management team continuously evaluates items to add to our recurring coverage list, basing selections on threat and security advisories, overall industry adoption, and customer requests.

We recently added several notable software products/services to our list of recurring coverage, including:

  • AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux. These free Linux operating systems have grown in popularity among Rapid7 Vulnerability Management customers seeking a replacement for CentOS. Adding recurring coverage for both AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux enables customers to more safely make the switch and maintain visibility into their vulnerability risk profile.
  • Oracle E-Business Suite. ERP systems contain organizations’ “crown jewels” – like customer data, financial information, strategic plans, and other proprietary data – so it’s no surprise that attacks on these systems have increased in recent years. Our new recurring coverage for the Oracle E-Business Suite is one of the most complex pieces of recurring coverage added to our list, providing coverage for several different components to ensure ongoing protection for Oracle E-Business Suite customers’ most valuable information.
  • VMware Horizon. The VMware Horizon platform enables the delivery of virtual desktops and applications across a number of operating systems. VDI is a prime target for bad actors trying to access customer environments, due in part to its multiple entry points; once a hacker gains entry, it’s fairly easy for them to jump into a company’s servers and critical files. By providing recurring coverage for both the VMware server and client, Rapid7 gives customers broad coverage of this particular risk profile.

Remediation Projects (InsightVM)​​

Remediation Projects help security teams collaborate and track progress of remediation work (often assigned to their IT ops counterparts). We’re excited to announce a few updates to this feature:

Better way to track progress for projects

The InsightVM team has updated the metric that calculates progress for Remediation Projects. The new metric will advance for each individual asset remediated within a “solution” group. Yes, this means customers no longer have to wait for all the affected assets to be remediated to see progress. Security teams can thus have meaningful discussions about progress with assigned remediators or upper management. Learn more.

Remediator Export

We added a new and much requested solution-based CSV export option to Remediation Projects. Remediator Export contains detailed information about the assets, vulnerabilities, proof data, and more for a given solution. This update makes it easy and quick for the Security teams to share relevant data with the Remediation team. It also gives remediators all of the information they need.On the other hand, the remediators will have all the information they need. We call this a win-win for both teams! Learn more.

Project search bar for Projects

Our team has added a search bar on the Remediation Projects page. This highly requested feature empowers customers to easily locate a project instead of having to scroll down the entire list.

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q2 2022 in Review

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

To Maze and Beyond: How the Ransomware Double Extortion Space Has Evolved

Post Syndicated from Tom Caiazza original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/07/27/to-maze-and-beyond-how-the-ransomware-double-extortion-space-has-evolved/

To Maze and Beyond: How the Ransomware Double Extortion Space Has Evolved

We’re here with the final installment in our Pain Points: Ransomware Data Disclosure Trends report blog series, and today we’re looking at a unique aspect of the report that clarifies not just what ransomware actors choose to disclose, but who discloses what, and how the ransomware landscape has changed over the last two years.

Firstly, we should tell you that our research centered around the concept of double extortion. Unlike traditional ransomware attacks, where bad actors take over a victim’s network and hold the data hostage for ransom, double extortion takes it a step further and extorts the victim for more money with the threat (and, in some cases, execution) of the release of sensitive data. So not only does a victim experience a ransomware attack, they also experience a data breach, and the additional risk of that data becoming publicly available if they do not pay.

According to our research, there have been a handful of major players in the double extortion field starting in April 2020, when our data begins, and February 2022. Double extortion itself was in many ways pioneered by the Maze ransomware group, so it should not surprise anyone that we will focus on them first.

The rise and fall of Maze and the splintering of ransomware double extortion

Maze’s influence on the current state of ransomware should not be understated. Prior to the group’s pioneering of double extortion, many ransomware actors intended to sell the data they encrypted to other criminal entities. Maze, however, popularized another revenue stream for these bad actors, leaning on the victims themselves for more money. Using coercive pressure, Maze did an end run around one of the most important safeguards organizations can take against ransomware: having safely secured and regularly updated backups of their important data.

Throughout most of 2020 Maze was the leader of the double extortion tactic among ransomware groups, accounting for 30% of the 94 reported cases of double extortion between April and December of 2020. This is even more remarkable given the fact that Maze itself was shut down in November of 2020.

Other top ransomware groups also accounted for large percentages of data disclosures. For instance, in that same year, REvil/Sodinokibi accounted for 19%, Conti accounted for 14%, and NetWalker 12%. To give some indication of just how big Maze’s influence was and offer explanation for what happened after they were shut down, Maze and REvil/Sodinokibi accounted for nearly half of all double extortion attacks that year.

However, once Maze was out of the way, double extortion still continued, just with far more players taking smaller pieces of the pie. Conti and REvil/Sodinokibi were still major players in 2021, but their combined market share barely ticked up, making up just 35% of the market even without Maze dominating the space. Conti accounted for 19%, and REvil/Sodinokibi dropped to 16%.

But other smaller players saw increases in 2021. CL0P’s market share rose to 9%, making it the third most active group. Darkside and RansomEXX both went from 2% in 2020 to 6% in 2021. There were 16 other groups who came onto the scene, but none of them took more than 5% market share. Essentially, with Maze out of the way, the ransomware market splintered with even the big groups from the year before being unable to step in and fill Maze’s shoes.

What they steal depends on who they are

Even ransomware groups have their own preferred types of data to steal, release, and hold hostage. REvil/Sodinokibi focused heavily on releasing customer and patient data (present in 55% of their disclosures), finance and accounting data (present in 55% of their disclosures), employee PII and HR data (present in 52% of their disclosures), and sales and marketing data (present in 48% of their disclosures).

CL0P on the other hand was far more focused on Employee PII & HR data with that type of information present in 70% of their disclosures, more than double any other type of data. Conti overwhelmingly focused on Finance and Accounting data (present in 81% of their disclosures) whereas Customer & Patient Data was just 42% and Employee PII & HR data at just 27%.

Ultimately, these organizations have their own unique interests in the type of data they choose to steal and release during the double extortion layer of their ransomware attacks. They can act as calling cards for the different groups that help illuminate the inner workings of the ransomware ecosystem.

Thank you for joining us on this unprecedented dive into the world of double extortion as told through the data disclosures themselves. To dive even deeper into the data, download the full report.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Q2 InsightVM Release Update: Let’s Focus on Remediation for Just a Minute

Post Syndicated from Devin Krugly original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/07/14/q2-insightvm-release-update-lets-focus-on-remediation-for-just-a-minute/

Q2 InsightVM Release Update: Let’s Focus on Remediation for Just a Minute

Think of an endeavor in your life where your success is entirely dependent on the success of others. What’s the first example that comes to mind? It’s common in team sports – a quarterback and a wide receiver, a fullback and their goalie, an equestrian and their horse.

What if you narrow the scope to endeavors or activities at work? A little more difficult, right? A large project is an easy candidate, but those are generally distributed across many people over a long time period, which allows for mitigation and planning.

For those that make a living in cybersecurity, the example that immediately comes to mind is vulnerability management (VM). VM, which really falls under the heading of risk management, requires deft handling of executive communications, sometimes blurred to abstract away the tedious numbers and present a risk statement. At the same time, judicious management of vulnerability instances and non-compliant configurations that exceed organization thresholds – i.e., all the numbers – requires very detailed and often painstaking focus on the minutiae of a VM program. Then, layer in the need for situational awareness to answer context-specific questions like, “Are we vulnerable, and if so, do we need to act immediately?” or “Why did the security patch fail on only 37 of the 2184 target systems?” It becomes glaringly apparent that communication and alignment among all stakeholders – security team, IT operations, and business leadership – are paramount to achieve “dependent” success.

Based on customer feedback and directional input, we’re pleased to release two updates that are aimed at not only improving VM program success but also reducing the effort to get you there.

Remediation Project progress

In what may be the most exciting and warmly received update for some, we are releasing a new method to calculate and display progress for Remediation Projects. Historically, credit for patching and subsequent reporting of “percent complete” toward closing any one Remediation Project was only given when all affected assets for a single solution were remediated. So we’ve updated the calculation to account for “partial” credit. Now, remediation teams will see incremental progress as individual assets for specific solutions (i.e. patches) are applied. This is a much more accurate representation of the work and effort invested. It is also a much more precise indication of what additional effort is needed to close out the last few pesky hosts that have so far resisted your best remediation efforts.

For some, the scope and scale of risk management in the world of VM has outgrown original designs – more assets, more vulns. We’ve acted on the sage wisdom of many who have suggested such an update and made that available in Version 6.6.150

Q2 InsightVM Release Update: Let’s Focus on Remediation for Just a Minute

This update will affect all Remediation Projects, so we encourage teams to leverage this blog post to share the details behind this release as a heads-up and possibly improve relations with your teammates. It’s only by partnering and aligning on the effort involved that this “success dependency” becomes a power-up, rather than a power drain.

Remediator Export

I am particularly excited about this seemingly minor but mighty update, because I can remember having to script around or find automation to stitch together different source documents to produce what we have elected to refer to as a Remediator Export. The number of stakeholders and the diversity of teams involved in modern VM programs necessitate on-demand access to the supporting data and associated context. This export is for – you guessed it – the teams that have the heaviest lift in any VM program: the folks that push patches, update configs, apply mitigating controls, and are usually involved in all the necessary testing – the Remediators. Whether the catalyst for such a detailed export (26 data fields in all) is to troubleshoot a failed install or to simply have more direct access to vulnerability proof data the Remediator Export will offer improvements for nearly every remediation team.

Q2 InsightVM Release Update: Let’s Focus on Remediation for Just a Minute

You can access this upcoming solution based export from any Remediation Project peek panel. The Export to CSV dropdown now has an additional option that includes the data fields cited above and helps meet team’s needs where they are today.

Q2 InsightVM Release Update: Let’s Focus on Remediation for Just a Minute

The Remediator CSV file is accessible to anyone with permission to Remediation Projects, Goals, and SLAs and carries the following naming convention: “Project-Name_Solution-UUID.csv.” We are already thinking about options to provide similar capability at the Remediation Project level.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Patch Tuesday – July 2022

Post Syndicated from Greg Wiseman original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/07/12/patch-tuesday-july-2022/

Patch Tuesday - July 2022

Microsoft’s updates for July’s Patch Tuesday fix 86 CVEs, including two vulnerabilities in their Chromium-based Edge browser that were patched earlier in the month.

One 0-day vulnerability has been patched: CVE-2022-22047 affects all currently supported versions of Microsoft’s pervasive operating system. This is an elevation-of-privilege vulnerability in the Windows Client Server Runtime Subsystem (CSRSS), a critical service that is often impersonated by malware. An attacker with an already-existing foothold can exploit this vulnerability to gain SYSTEM-level privileges. Two similar vulnerabilities in CSRSS (CVE-2022-22049 and CVE-2022-22026) were also fixed, likely as a result of Microsoft’s investigation into the in-the-wild exploitation of CVE-2022-22047.

Four critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities were fixed today. CVE-2022-22029 and CVE-2022-22039 affect network file system (NFS) servers, and CVE-2022-22038 affects the remote procedure call (RPC) runtime. Although all three of these will be relatively tricky for attackers to exploit due to the amount of sustained data that needs to be transmitted, administrators should patch sooner rather than later. CVE-2022-30221 supposedly affects the Windows Graphics Component, though Microsoft’s FAQ indicates that exploitation requires users to access a malicious RDP server.

Over a third of today’s vulnerabilities (a whopping 32 CVEs) affect their Azure Site Recovery offering. Anyone making use of this VMWare-to-Azure backup solution should be sure to upgrade to version 9.49 of the Microsoft Azure Site Recovery Unified Setup, available in Update rollup 62.

Summary charts

Patch Tuesday - July 2022
Patch Tuesday - July 2022
Patch Tuesday - July 2022
Patch Tuesday - July 2022

Summary tables

Azure vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-33676 Azure Site Recovery Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.2 Yes
CVE-2022-33678 Azure Site Recovery Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.2 Yes
CVE-2022-33674 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.3 Yes
CVE-2022-33675 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-33677 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.2 Yes
CVE-2022-30181 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33641 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33643 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33655 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33656 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33657 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33661 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33662 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33663 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33665 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33666 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33667 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33672 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33673 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-33642 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33650 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33651 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33653 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33654 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33659 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33660 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33664 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33668 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33669 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33671 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.9 Yes
CVE-2022-33652 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.4 Yes
CVE-2022-33658 Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 4.4 Yes

Azure Microsoft Dynamics vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30187 Azure Storage Library Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 4.7 Yes

Browser vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-2295 Chromium: CVE-2022-2295 Type Confusion in V8 No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2294 Chromium: CVE-2022-2294 Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC No No N/A Yes

Microsoft Office vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-33633 Skype for Business and Lync Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.2 Yes
CVE-2022-33632 Microsoft Office Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 4.7 Yes

System Center vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-33637 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes

Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-33644 Xbox Live Save Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-22045 Windows.Devices.Picker.dll Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30222 Windows Shell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.4 Yes
CVE-2022-30216 Windows Server Service Tampering Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22041 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30214 Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 6.6 Yes
CVE-2022-22031 Windows Credential Guard Domain-joined Public Key Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30212 Windows Connected Devices Platform Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 4.7 Yes
CVE-2022-22711 Windows BitLocker Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.7 Yes
CVE-2022-22038 Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-27776 HackerOne: CVE-2022-27776 Insufficiently protected credentials vulnerability might leak authentication or cookie header data No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-30215 Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes

Windows ESU vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30208 Windows Security Account Manager (SAM) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 6.5 No
CVE-2022-30206 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30226 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes
CVE-2022-22022 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes
CVE-2022-22023 Windows Portable Device Enumerator Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 6.6 Yes
CVE-2022-22029 Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-22039 Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-22028 Windows Network File System Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.9 Yes
CVE-2022-30225 Windows Media Player Network Sharing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes
CVE-2022-30211 Windows Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-21845 Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 4.7 Yes
CVE-2022-22025 Windows Internet Information Services Cachuri Module Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-30209 Windows IIS Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.4 Yes
CVE-2022-22042 Windows Hyper-V Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30223 Windows Hyper-V Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.7 Yes
CVE-2022-30205 Windows Group Policy Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.6 Yes
CVE-2022-30221 Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22034 Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30213 Windows GDI+ Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-22024 Windows Fax Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22027 Windows Fax Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22050 Windows Fax Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22043 Windows Fast FAT File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30220 Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22026 Windows CSRSS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22047 Windows CSRSS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability Yes No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22049 Windows CSRSS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30203 Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 7.4 Yes
CVE-2022-22037 Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30202 Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-30224 Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-22036 Performance Counters for Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-22040 Internet Information Services Dynamic Compression Module Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.3 Yes
CVE-2022-22048 BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 6.1 Yes
CVE-2022-23825 AMD: CVE-2022-23825 AMD CPU Branch Type Confusion No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-23816 AMD: CVE-2022-23816 AMD CPU Branch Type Confusion No No N/A Yes

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

How to Build and Enable a Cyber Target Operating Model

Post Syndicated from Rapid7 original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/07/08/how-to-build-and-enable-a-cyber-target-operating-model/

How to Build and Enable a Cyber Target Operating Model

Cybersecurity is complex and ever-changing. Organisations should be able to evaluate their capabilities and identify areas where improvement is needed.

In the webinar “Foundational Components to Enable a Cyber Target Operating Model,” – part two of our Cybersecurity Series – Jason Hart, Chief Technology Officer, EMEA, explained the journey to a targeted operating cybersecurity model. To build a cybersecurity program is to understand your business context. Hart explains how organisations can use this information to map out their cyber risk profile and identify areas for improvement.

Organisations require an integrated approach to manage all aspects of their cyber risk holistically and efficiently. They need to be able to manage their information security program as part of their overall risk management strategy to address both internal and external cyber threats effectively.

Identifying priority areas to begin the cyber target operating model journey

You should first determine what data is most important to protect, where it resides, and who has access to it. Once you’ve pinned down these areas, you can identify each responsible business function to create a list of priorities. We suggest mapping out:

  • All the types of data within your organisation
  • All locations where the data resides, including cloud, database, virtual machine, desktops, and servers
  • All the people that have access to the data and its locations
  • The business function associated with each area

Once you have identified the most recurring business functions, you can list your priority areas. Only 12% of our webinar audience said they were confident in understanding their organisation’s type of data.

Foundations to identify risk, protection, detection, response, and recovery

To start operationalising cybersecurity within a targeted area, we first set the maturity of each foundation. A strong foundation will help ensure all systems are protected from attacks and emerging threats. People play a critical role in providing protection and cyber resilience. They should be aware of potential risks so they can take appropriate actions to protect themselves and their business function.

1. Culture

A set of values shared by everyone in an organisation determines how people think and approach cybersecurity. Your culture should emphasise, reinforce, and drive behaviour to create a resilient workforce.

Every security awareness program should, at minimum, communicate security policy requirements to staff. Tracking employee policy acknowledgements will ensure your workforce is aware of the policy and helps you meet compliance requirements.

A quick response can reduce damages from an attack. Security awareness training should teach your workforce how to self-report incidents, malicious files, or phishing emails. This metric will prove you have safeguards in place. Tailor security awareness training to employees’ roles and functions to measure the effectiveness of each department.

2. Measurement

Measuring the ability to identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover from cybersecurity risks and threats enables a robust operating model. The best approach requires an understanding of what your most significant risks are. Consider analysing the following:

  • Phishing rate: A reduction in the phishing rate over time provides increased awareness of security threats and the effectiveness of awareness training. Leverage a phishing simulation to document the open rates per business function to track phishing risks.
  • The number of security breaches: Track and record the number of new incidents and breaches every month. Measure a monthly percentage increase or decrease.
  • Mean time to detect (MTTD): Calculate how long it takes your team to become aware of indicators of compromise and other security threats. To calculate MTTD, take the sum of the hours spent detecting, acknowledging, and resolving an alert, and divide it by the number of incidents.
  • Patching cadence: Determine how long it takes to implement application security patches or mitigate high-risk CVE-listed vulnerabilities.
  • Mean time to recovery (MTTR): Take the sum of downtime for a given period and divide it by the number of incidents. For example, if you had 20 minutes of downtime caused by two different events over two days, your MTTR is 20 divided by two, equalling 10 minutes.

3. Accountability

A security goal generates the requirement for actions of an entity to be traced uniquely to support non-repudiation, deterrence, fault isolation, intrusion detection, prevention, after-action recovery, and legal action.

The quality of your incident response plan will determine how much time passes between assigning tasks to different business functions. Calculate the mean time between business functions aware of a cyber attack and their response. Additionally, calculate the mean time to resolve a cyber attack once they have become aware by measuring how much time passes between assigning tasks to different business functions.

Also, consider recording how internal stakeholders perform with awareness or other security program efforts to track the effectiveness of training.

4. Process

Processes are critical to implementing an effective strategy and help maintain and support operationalising cybersecurity.

To determine your increase in the number of risks, link the percent differences in the number of risks identified across the business monthly. Identify accepted risks by stakeholders and vendors monthly, and hold regular information security forums between business functions to review levels of progress. It’s also wise to document meeting notes and actions for compliance and internal reference.

5. Resources

Ownership of cybersecurity across the business creates knowledge to manage, maintain and operate cybersecurity.

When determining the effectiveness of resources, analyse what levels of training you give different levels of stakeholders. For example, administration training will differ from targeted executives.

Calculate the engagement levels of input and feedback from previous awareness training and record positive and negative feedback from all stakeholders. Ensure that different parts of the business have the required skill level and knowledge within the business function’s scope. Use a skills matrix aligned to security domains to uncover stakeholders’ hidden knowledge or skill gaps.

6. Automation

The automation of security tasks includes administrative duties, incident detection, response, and identification risk.

Consider implementing automation in vulnerability management processes internally and externally to the business. Additionally, detect intrusion attempts and malicious actions that try to breach your networks. And finally, automate patch management actions on all assets within scope by assessing the number of patches deployed per month based on the environment, i.e. cloud.

A journey that delivers outcomes

A cyber-targeted operating model is a unique approach that provides defensibility, detectability, and accountability. The model is based on the idea that you can’t protect what you don’t know and aims to provide a holistic view of your organisation’s security posture. By identifying the most critical business functions and defining a process for each foundation, you can develop your cyber maturity over time.

To get the maximum benefit from Cybersecurity Series: Hackers ‘re Gonna Hack, watch Part One: Operationalising Cybersecurity to benchmark your existing maturity against the six foundational components. Watch Part 2: Foundational Components to Enable a Cyber Target Operating Model on-demand, or pre-register for Part Three: Cybersecurity KPIs to Track and Share with Your Board to begin mapping against your priority areas. Attendees will receive a complete list of Cybersecurity KPIs that align with the maturity level of your organisation.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Patch Tuesday – June 2022

Post Syndicated from Greg Wiseman original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/06/14/patch-tuesday-june-2022/

Patch Tuesday - June 2022

July’s Patch Tuesday sees Microsoft releasing fixes for over 60 CVEs. Top of mind for many administrators this month is CVE-2022-30190, also known as Follina, which was observed being exploited in the wild at the end of May. Microsoft provided mitigation instructions (disabling the MSDT URL protocol via the registry), but actual patches were not available until today’s cumulative Windows Updates. Even if the mitigation was previously applied, installing the updates is highly recommended.

None of the other CVEs being addressed this month have been previously disclosed or seen exploited yet. However, it won’t be long before attackers start looking at CVE-2022-30136, a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting the Windows Network File System (NFS). Last month, Microsoft fixed a similar vulnerability (CVE-2022-26937) affecting NFS v2.0 and v3.0. CVE-2022-30136, on the other hand, is only exploitable in NFS v4.1. Microsoft has provided mitigation guidance to disable NFS v4.1, which should only be done if the May updates fixing previous NFS versions have been applied. Again, even if the mitigation has been put into place, best to patch sooner rather than later.

Also reminiscent of last month is CVE-2022-30139, a critical RCE in LDAP carrying a CVSSv3 base score of 7.1, which again is only exploitable if the MaxReceiveBuffer LDAP policy value is set higher than the default. Rounding out the critical RCEs for July is CVE-2022-30163, which could allow a malicious application running on a Hyper-V guest to execute code on the host OS.

The other big news this month is the end of support for Internet Explorer 11 (IE11) on Windows 10 Semi-Annual Channels and Windows 10 IoT Semi-Annual Channels, as Microsoft encourages users to adopt the Chromium-based Edge browser (which saw fixes for 5 CVEs this month). Internet Explorer 11 on other versions of Windows should continue receiving security updates and technical support based on the OS support lifecycle, so this is only the beginning of the end for the legacy browser.

Summary charts

Patch Tuesday - June 2022
Patch Tuesday - June 2022
Patch Tuesday - June 2022
Patch Tuesday - June 2022

Summary tables

Apps vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30168 Microsoft Photos App Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

Azure vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30137 Azure Service Fabric Container Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 6.7 Yes
CVE-2022-30177 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30178 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30179 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30180 Azure RTOS GUIX Studio Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

Azure System Center vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-29149 Azure Open Management Infrastructure (OMI) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

Browser vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-22021 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.3 Yes
CVE-2022-2011 Chromium: CVE-2022-2011 Use after free in ANGLE No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2010 Chromium: CVE-2022-2010 Out of bounds read in compositing No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2008 Chromium: CVE-2022-2008 Out of bounds memory access in WebGL No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-2007 Chromium: CVE-2022-2007 Use after free in WebGPU No No N/A Yes

Developer Tools vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30184 .NET and Visual Studio Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes

ESU Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30140 Windows iSCSI Discovery Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes
CVE-2022-30152 Windows Network Address Translation (NAT) Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-30135 Windows Media Center Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-30153 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30161 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30141 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-30143 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30149 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30146 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30155 Windows Kernel Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30147 Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-30163 Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30142 Windows File History Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.1 Yes
CVE-2022-30151 Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-30160 Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-30166 Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-21166 Intel: CVE-2022-21166 Device Register Partial Write (DRPW) No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-21127 Intel: CVE-2022-21127 Special Register Buffer Data Sampling Update (SRBDS Update) No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-21125 Intel: CVE-2022-21125 Shared Buffers Data Sampling (SBDS) No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-21123 Intel: CVE-2022-21123 Shared Buffers Data Read (SBDR) No No N/A Yes

Microsoft Office vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-30157 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30158 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30174 Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.4 Yes
CVE-2022-30159 Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30171 Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30172 Microsoft Office Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30173 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

SQL Server vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-29143 Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes

Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-32230 Windows SMB Denial of Service Vulnerability No No N/A Yes
CVE-2022-30136 Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30139 Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30162 Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30165 Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30145 Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30148 Windows Desired State Configuration (DSC) Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30150 Windows Defender Remote Credential Guard Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30132 Windows Container Manager Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-30131 Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-30189 Windows Autopilot Device Management and Enrollment Client Spoofing Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-30154 Microsoft File Server Shadow Copy Agent Service (RVSS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 5.3 Yes
CVE-2022-30164 Kerberos AppContainer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 8.4 Yes
CVE-2022-29111 HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22018 HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30188 HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29119 HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30167 AV1 Video Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30193 AV1 Video Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Additional reading:

The Hidden Harm of Silent Patches

Post Syndicated from Tod Beardsley original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/06/06/the-hidden-harm-of-silent-patches/

The Hidden Harm of Silent Patches

Hey all. I’m about to head off to RSAC 2022, but I wanted to jot down some thoughts I’ve had lately on a particularly squirrelly issue that comes up occasionally in coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD) — the issue of silent patches, and how they tend to help focused attackers and harm IT protectors.

In the bad old days, most major software vendors were rather notorious for sweeping vulnerability reports under the rug. They made it difficult for legitimate researchers to report vulnerabilities, often by accident, occasionally on purpose. Researchers would report bugs, and those reports would fester in unobserved space, then suddenly the proof-of-concept exploit wouldn’t work any more. This was (and is) the standard silent patching model. No credit, no explanation, no CVE ID, nothing.

The justification for this approach seems pretty sensible, though. Why would a vendor go out of their way to explain what a security fix does? After all, if you know how the patch works, then you have a pretty good guess at the root cause of the vulnerability and, therefore, how the exploit works. So, by publicizing these patch details, you’re effectively leading attackers to the goods, based on your own documentation. Not cool, right?

So, the natural conclusion is that by limiting the technical details of a given vulnerability to merely the patch contents, and by withholding those details explained in plan languages and proof-of-concept exploit code and screenshots and videos and all the rest, you are limiting the general knowledge pool of people who actually understand the vulnerability and how to exploit it.

Unpacking the silent patch

This sounds like a great plan, but there’s a catch. When a software company releases a patch for software, in nearly all cases, they’re not using exotic packers, they’re not employing anti-forensics, and even if the patch data is encrypted and obfuscated, at some point it’s got to modify the code on the running software — which means that it’s all available to anyone who has a running instance of the patched software and knows how to use a debugger and a disassembler. And who uses debuggers to inspect the effects of patches? Exploit developers, pretty much exclusively.

Knowing this, let’s modify the expectations of the silent patch strategy: When you silently patch, you are intending to limit knowledge of the patched vulnerability to skilled exploit devs.

It’s still true that you’re excluding the casual attacker (or “script kiddie,” in the common parlance), and that’s great and desirable. However, you’re also excluding a huge population of IT protectors: penetration testers who are paid to write and run exploits to test defenses leap to mind, in addition to the folks who write and deploy defensive technologies like vulnerability management, intrusion detection and prevention, incident detection, and all the rest. You also exclude tech journalists, academics, and policy makers who want to understand and communicate the nature of software vulnerabilities, but who aren’t likely to bust out a disassembler.

Most significantly, you’re excluding the most important audience for your patch: the regular IT administrators and managers who need to sort out the incoming flow of patches based on some risk and severity criteria and make the call for downtime and update scheduling based on that criteria. Not all vulnerabilities are equal, and while protectors want to get around to all of them, they need to figure out which ones to apply today and which ones can wait for the next maintenance cycle.

By the way, it’s true that some of these IT professionals also have the capability to reverse-engineer your patch. In practice, people who are only interested in keeping IT humming never, ever reverse patches to see if they’re worth applying. It’s way too complicated and time-consuming. I’ve never seen a case where this is part of the decision-making process to patch now or later.

Don’t leave defenders in the dark

So now, let’s reexamine the case for silent patching yet again: When you silently patch, you are communicating vulnerability details, exclusively, to skilled, criminal attackers who are specifically targeting your product, while leaving your customers in the dark. You are intentionally withholding information from casual attackers, secondary defenders, and your customers and users who are desperate to make informed security engineering decisions involving your product or project. Oh, and let’s not forget, you’re also limiting knowledge about these fixed vulnerabilities from future employees and contributors, who very well might re-introduce the same or similar bugs in your product down the road. After all, the details are secret, even from future-you.

All this is to say, silent patching is tantamount to full disclosure to a very small audience who mostly want to hurt you and your users. Fully documented patches reach the much, much larger audience of people, present and future, who want to help you and your users. While it’s true that you are also offering educational opportunities to casual attackers along the way, I believe the global population of casual attackers is much, much smaller than your legitimate users and all the secondary and tertiary defenders who are on your side.

So, next time a vulnerability researcher states their intention of publishing details about their reported (and now patched) vulnerability, try to examine your urge to keep those details under wraps, and maybe even encourage them to be honest and transparent with their findings. The alternative is to build up the operational capabilities of the true criminal and espionage enterprises while degrading the decision-making power of IT protectors.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Maximize Your VM Investment: Fix Vulnerabilities Faster With Automox + Rapid7

Post Syndicated from Nicholas Colyer original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/05/16/maximize-your-vm-investment-fix-vulnerabilities-faster-with-automox-rapid7/

Maximize Your VM Investment: Fix Vulnerabilities Faster With Automox + Rapid7

The Rapid7 InsightConnect Extension library is getting bigger! We’ve teamed up with IT operations platform, Automox, to release a new plugin and technology alliance that closes the aperture of attack for vulnerability findings and automates remediation. Using the Automox Plugin for Rapid7 InsightConnect in conjunction with InsightVM, customers are able to:

  • Automate discovery-to-remediation of vulnerability findings
  • Query Automox device details via Slack or Microsoft Teams

Getting started with Automox within InsightConnect

Automox is an IT Operations platform that fully automates the process of endpoint management across Windows, macOS, Linux, and third-party software — including Adobe, Java, Firefox, Chrome, and Windows.

The Automox InsightConnect Plugin allows mutual customers of Rapid7 and Automox to expand their capabilities between products, ultimately streamlining cyber security outcomes and operational effectiveness. Seamlessly transition CVE-based vulnerability findings through discovery to remediation, and perform device queries without needing to leave Slack or Microsoft Teams!

Example workflows you can start leveraging now with the Automox Plugin

  • Generate Rapid7 InsightVM Report and Upload to Automox Vulnerability Sync: An example workflow that leverages threat context for assets and prioritizes them for remediation. An InsightVM report is automatically generated and uploaded using Automox’s Vulnerability Sync for easy remediation, saving internal teams precious time and effort in managing  critically emerging threats – from start to finish.
  • Automox Device Lookup from Microsoft Teams: An example workflow that lets a user query a device in Automox directly from Microsoft Teams.
  • Automox Device Lookup from Slack: An example workflow that lets a user query a device in Automox directly from Slack.

For more information or to start using this plugin, access and install the Automox Plugin for Rapid7 InsightConnect through the Rapid7 Extension Library.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

Patch Tuesday – May 2022

Post Syndicated from Greg Wiseman original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/05/10/patch-tuesday-may-2022/

Patch Tuesday - May 2022

This month is par for the course in terms of both number and severity of vulnerabilities being patched by Microsoft. That means there’s plenty of work to be done by system and network administrators, as usual.

There is one 0-day this month: CVE-2022-26925, a Spoofing vulnerability in the Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) subsystem, which allows attackers able to perform a man-in-the-middle attack to force domain controllers to authenticate to the attacker using NTLM authentication. This is very bad news when used in conjunction with an NTLM relay attack, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE). This bug affects all supported versions of Windows, but Domain Controllers should be patched on a priority basis before updating other servers.

Two other CVEs were also publicly disclosed before today’s releases, though they have not yet been seen exploited in the wild. CVE-2022-22713 is a denial-of-service vulnerability that affects Hyper-V servers running relatively recent versions of Windows (20H2 and later). CVE-2022-29972 is a Critical RCE that affects the Amazon Redshift ODBC driver used by Microsoft’s Self-hosted Integration Runtime (a client agent that enables on-premises data sources to exchange data with cloud services such as Azure Data Factory and Azure Synapse Pipelines). This vulnerability also prompted Microsoft to publish their first guidance-based advisory of the year, ADV220001, indicating their plans to strengthen tenant isolation in their cloud services without actually providing any specific details or actions to be taken by customers.

All told, 74 CVEs were fixed this month, the vast majority of which affect functionality within the Windows operating system. Other notable vulnerabilities include CVE-2022-21972 and CVE-2022-23270, critical RCEs in the Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol. Exploitation requires attackers to win a race condition, which increases the complexity, but if you have any RAS servers in your environment, patch sooner rather than later.

CVE-2022-26937 carries a CVSSv3 score of 9.8 and affects services using the Windows Network File System (NFS). This can be mitigated by disabling NFSV2 and NFSV3 on the server; however, this may cause compatibility issues, and upgrading is highly recommended.

CVE-2022-22017 is yet another client-side Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) vulnerability. While not as worrisome as when an RCE affects RDP servers, if a user can be enticed to connect to a malicious RDP server via social engineering tactics, an attacker will gain RCE on their system.

Sharepoint Server administrators should be aware of CVE-2022-29108, a post-authentication RCE fixed today. Exchange admins have CVE-2022-21978 to worry about, which could allow an attacker with elevated privileges on an Exchange server to gain the rights of a Domain Administrator.

A host of Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) vulnerabilities were also addressed this month, including CVE-2022-22012 and CVE-2022-29130 – both RCEs that, thankfully, are only exploitable if the MaxReceiveBuffer LDAP policy is set to a value higher than the default value.

Although there are no browser vulnerabilities this month, two RCEs affecting Excel (CVE-2022-29109 and CVE-2022-29110) and one Security Feature Bypass affecting Office (CVE-2022-29107) mean there is still some endpoint application patching to do.

Summary charts

Patch Tuesday - May 2022
Patch Tuesday - May 2022
Patch Tuesday - May 2022
Patch Tuesday - May 2022

Summary tables

Azure vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-29972 Insight Software: CVE-2022-29972 Magnitude Simba Amazon Redshift ODBC Driver No Yes N/A Yes

Developer Tools vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-29148 Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-30129 Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-23267 .NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-29117 .NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-29145 .NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 7.5 No
CVE-2022-30130 .NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 3.3 No

ESU Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-26935 Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29121 Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service Denial of Service Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-26936 Windows Server Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-22015 Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29103 Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-29132 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-26937 Windows Network File System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-26925 Windows LSA Spoofing Vulnerability Yes Yes 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-22012 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29130 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 9.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22013 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 No
CVE-2022-22014 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 No
CVE-2022-29128 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29129 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29137 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 No
CVE-2022-29139 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29141 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 No
CVE-2022-26931 Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.5 Yes
CVE-2022-26934 Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29112 Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-22011 Windows Graphics Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29115 Windows Fax Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-26926 Windows Address Book Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-22019 Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-21972 Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-23270 Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.1 Yes
CVE-2022-29105 Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-29127 BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 4.2 Yes

Exchange Server vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-21978 Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.2 Yes

Microsoft Office vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-29108 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29107 Microsoft Office Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29109 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29110 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes

Windows vulnerabilities

CVE Title Exploited? Publicly disclosed? CVSSv3 base score Has FAQ?
CVE-2022-26930 Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29125 Windows Push Notifications Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-29114 Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29140 Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29104 Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 No
CVE-2022-22016 Windows PlayToManager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-26933 Windows NTFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29131 Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29116 Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 4.7 Yes
CVE-2022-29133 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29142 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-29106 Windows Hyper-V Shared Virtual Disk Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-24466 Windows Hyper-V Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 4.1 Yes
CVE-2022-22713 Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability No Yes 5.6 Yes
CVE-2022-26927 Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29102 Windows Failover Cluster Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 5.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29113 Windows Digital Media Receiver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7.8 Yes
CVE-2022-29134 Windows Clustered Shared Volume Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29120 Windows Clustered Shared Volume Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29122 Windows Clustered Shared Volume Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29123 Windows Clustered Shared Volume Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-29138 Windows Clustered Shared Volume Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-29135 Windows Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-29150 Windows Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-29151 Windows Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-26913 Windows Authentication Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability No No 7.4 Yes
CVE-2022-23279 Windows ALPC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-29126 Tablet Windows User Interface Application Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-26932 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.2 Yes
CVE-2022-26938 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-26939 Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 7 Yes
CVE-2022-26940 Remote Desktop Protocol Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability No No 6.5 Yes
CVE-2022-22017 Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes
CVE-2022-26923 Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability No No 8.8 Yes

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

How to Strategically Scale Vendor Management and Supply Chain Security

Post Syndicated from AJ Debole original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/04/26/how-to-strategically-scale-vendor-management-and-supply-chain-security/

How to Strategically Scale Vendor Management and Supply Chain Security

This post is co-authored by Collin Huber

Recent security events — particularly the threat actor activity from the Lapsu$ group, Spring4Shell, and various new supply-chain attacks — have the security community on high alert. Security professionals and network defenders around the world are wondering what we can do to make the organizations we serve less likely to be featured in an article as the most recently compromised company.

In this post, we’ll articulate some simple changes we can all make in the near future to provide more impactful security guidance and controls to decrease risk in our environments.

Maintain good cyber hygiene

Here are some basic steps that organizations can take to ensure their security posture is in good health and risks are at a manageable level.

1.  Review privileged user activity for anomalies

Take this opportunity to review logs of privileged user activity. Additionally, review instances of changed passwords, as well as any other unexpected activity. Interview the end user to help determine the authenticity of the change. Take into consideration the types of endpoints used across your network, as well as expected actions or any changes to privileges (e.g. privilege escalation).

2. Enforce use of multifactor authentication

Has multifactor authentication (MFA) deployment stalled at your firm? This is an excellent opportunity to revisit deployment of these initiatives. Use of MFA reduces the potential for compromise in a significant number of instances. There are several options for deployment of MFA. Hardware-based MFA methods, such as FIDO tokens, are typically the strongest, and numerous options offer user-friendly ways to use MFA — for example, from a smartphone. Ensure that employees and third parties are trained not to accept unexpected prompts to approve a connection.

3. Understand vendor risks

Does your acquisition process consider the security posture of the vendor in question? Based on the use case for the vendor and the business need, consider the security controls you require to maintain the integrity of your environment. Additionally, review available security reports to identify security controls to investigate further. If a security incident has occurred, consider the mitigating controls that were missing for that vendor. Depending on the response of that vendor and their ability to implement those security controls, determine if this should influence purchase decisions or contract renewal.      

4. Review monitoring and alerts

Review system logs for other critical systems, including those with high volumes of data. Consider reviewing systems that may not store, process, or transmit sensitive data but could have considerable vulnerabilities. Depending on the characteristics of these systems and their mitigating controls, it may be appropriate to prioritize patching, implement additional mitigating controls, and even consider additional alerting.

Always make sure to act as soon as you can. It’s better to enact incident response (IR) plans and de-escalate than not to.

Build a more secure supply chain

Risks are inherent in the software supply chain, but there are some strategies that can help you ensure your vendors are as secure as possible. Here are three key concepts to consider implementing.

1. Enumerate edge connection points between internal and vendor environments

Every organization has ingress and egress points with various external applications and service providers. When new services or vendors are procured, access control lists (ACLs) are updated to accommodate the new data streams — which presents an opportunity to record simple commands for shutting those streams down in the event of a vendor compromise.

Early stages of an incident are often daunting, frustrating, and confusing for all parties involved. Empowering information security (IS) and information technology (IT) teams to have these commands ahead of time decreases the guesswork that needs to be done to create them when an event occurs. This frees up resources to perform other critical elements of your IR plan as appropriate.

One of the most critical elements of incident response is containment. Many vendors will immediately disable external connections when an attack is discovered, but relying on an external party to act in the best interest of your organization is a challenging position for any security professional. If your organization has a list of external connections open to the impacted vendor, creating templates or files to easily cut and paste commands to cut off the connection is an easy step in the planning phase of incident response. These commands can be approved for dispatch by senior leadership and immediately put in place to ensure whatever nefarious behavior occurring on the vendor’s network cannot pass into your environment.

An additional benefit of enumerating and memorializing these commands enables teams to practice them or review them during annual updates of the IRP or tabletop exercises. If your organization does not have this information prepared right now, you have a great opportunity to collaborate with your IS and IT teams to improve your preparedness for a vendor compromise.

Vendor compromises can result in service outages which may have an operational impact on your organization. When your organization is considering ways to mitigate potential risks associated with outages and other supply chain issues, review your business continuity plan to ensure it has the appropriate coverage and provides right-sized guidance for resiliency. It may not make business sense to have alternatives for every system or process, so memorialize accepted risks in a Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM) and/or your Risk Register to record your rationale and demonstrate due diligence.

2. Maintain a vendor inventory with key POCs and SLAs

Having a centralized repository of vendors with key points of contact (POCs) for the account and service-level agreements (SLAs) relevant to the business relationship is an invaluable asset in the event of a breach or attack. The repository enables rapid communication with the appropriate parties at the vendor to open and maintain a clear line of communication, so you can share updates and get critical questions answered in a timely fashion. Having SLAs related to system downtime and system support is also instrumental to ensure the vendor is furnishing the agreed-upon services as promised.

3. Prepare templates to communicate to customers and other appropriate parties

Finally, set up templates for communications about what your team is doing to protect the environment and answer any high-level questions in the event of a security incident. For these documents, it is best to work with legal departments and senior leadership to ensure the amount of information provided and the manner in which it is disclosed is appropriate.

  • Internal communication: Have a formatted memo to easily address some key elements of what is occurring to keep staff apprised of the situation. You may want to include remarks indicating an investigation is underway, your internal environment is being monitored, relevant impacts staff may see, who to contact if external parties have questions, and reiterate how to report unusual device behavior to your HelpDesk or security team.
  • External communication: Communication for the press regarding the investigation or severity of the breach as appropriate.
  • Regulatory notices: Work with legal teams to templatize regulatory notifications to ensure the right data is easily provided by technical teams to be shared in an easy-to-update format.

Complex software supply chains introduce a wide range of vulnerabilities into our environments – but with these strategic steps in place, you can limit the impacts of security incidents and keep risk to a minimum in your third-party vendor relationships.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.

What’s New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q1 2022 in Review

Post Syndicated from Roshnee Mistry Shah original https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/04/19/whats-new-in-insightvm-and-nexpose-q1-2022-in-review/

What's New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q1 2022 in Review

The world of cybersecurity never has a dull moment. While we are still recovering from the aftermath of Log4Shell, the recent ContiLeaks exposed multiple vulnerabilities that have been exploited by the Conti ransomware group. It’s critical for your team to identify the risk posed by such vulnerabilities and implement necessary remediation measures. As you will see, the product updates our vulnerability management (VM) team has made to InsightVM and Nexpose in the last quarter will empower you to stay in charge — not the vulnerabilities.

But that’s not all we’ve improved on. We’ve increased the scope of vulnerabilities tracked by incorporating CISA’s known exploited vulnerabilities (KEV) in the Threat Feed, usability enhancements, targeted reporting and scanning, and Log4Shell mitigation checks. And we’ve released our annual Vulnerability Intelligence Report to help you make sense of the vulns that impacted us last year and understand the trends that we will all be facing this year. Our team also offers practical guidance to help the security teams better protect themselves.

Let’s dive into the key feature releases and updates on the vulnerability management front for Q1 2022.

CISA’s KEV list: Detect, prioritize, and meet regulatory compliance

[InsightVM] ContiLeaks Helpful Query to easily detect ContiLeaks vulns and ensure compliance

CISA’s KEV catalog is part of the agency’s binding operative directive that has reporting requirements for federal agencies and civilian contractors. The recent ContiLeaks revealed over 30 vulns that are now a part of CISA’s KEV. While users could always build a query in IVM to identify these vulns, doing so is time-consuming and can be prone to error. The ContiLeaks Helpful Query takes out the manual effort  and lets customers easily locate 30+ ContiLeaks vulnerabilities in their environments. When the query is loaded into our Specific Vulnerability Dashboard template, it can give an at-a-glance view of the company’s risk posture as it relates to the Conti threat. In addition to helping customers identify the exploited vulnerabilities in their environment, the update will also help them stay within the bounds of CISA’s operative directive.

What's New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q1 2022 in Review

What's New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q1 2022 in Review

[InsightVM] Threat feed dashboard now includes CISA’s KEV catalog

While we are on the topic of CISA, you will be excited to learn that we have expanded the scope of vulnerabilities tracked to incorporate CISA’s KEV catalog in the InsightVM Threat Feed Dashboard, including the Assets With Actively Targeted Vulnerabilities card and the Most Common Actively Targeted Vulnerabilities card. The CISA inclusion makes it easy to see how exposed your organization is to active threats and inform prioritization decisions around remediation efforts.

We have also added a new “CISA KEV (known exploited vulnerability)” vulnerability category to allow for more targeted scanning (i.e. scanning the environment for CISA KEV entries only). You can also use the CISA KEV category to filter scan reports.

What's New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q1 2022 in Review

Improvements to credentials

[Insight VM and Nexpose] A new credential type to support scanning Oracle Databases by Service Name

InsightVM and Nexpose customers have always been able to scan Oracle databases using SIDs (system identifiers) but were previously unable to provide a Service Name in the credential. This meant a gap in visibility for Oracle databases that could only be accessed via their Service Name. We were not happy with this limitation. Now, you now configure Oracle Database scans to specify a Service Name instead of an SID (you can still use the SID, if you want!) when authenticating. You now have the visibility into a wider range of deployment configurations of Oracle Database and the ability to configure scan using Service Name or SID.

What's New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q1 2022 in Review

[Insight VM and Nexpose] Automatic Scan Assistant credentials generation

Last year, we introduced Scan Assistant, which alleviates the credential management (for Scan Engine) burden on vulnerability management teams. For the Scan Assistant to communicate with the Scan Engine, it requires digital certificates to be manually created and deployed on both the target assets and the Nexpose / IVM Security Console. Manually creating the public / private key pair is a complex and error-prone process.

With this update, we are taking some more burden off the vulnerability management teams. You can now use the Shared Credentials management UI to automatically generate Scan Assistant credentials. This not only reduces the technical expertise and time required to manage Scan Assistant credentials but also makes for a user-friendly experience for you.

Learn more in our recent blog post on passwordless scanning.

What's New in InsightVM and Nexpose: Q1 2022 in Review

[Insight VM and Nexpose] Log4Shell mitigation checks

The product improvements list would be incomplete without an update on Log4Shell.

If you are vulnerable to Log4Shell, you can edit the JAR files on a system to take out the vulnerable code and thus not get exploited. However, it is difficult to keep a check on this manually. This update adds that extra capability to not only look at the version of Log4j that was present in your environment but also check if it has been mitigated — i.e., if the vulnerable code is removed.

Authenticated scans and Agent-based assessments can now determine whether the JNDILookup class removal mitigation for Log4Shell has been applied to Log4j JAR files on Windows systems. This will reduce the number of reports of the vulnerability on systems that are not exploitable. We also added an Obsolete Software vulnerability check for Log4j 1.x, which will let you find obsolete versions of Log4j in your environment.

Stay in charge

As always, we hope these updates will make it easier for you to stay ahead of vulnerabilities.

It almost felt like the quarter might end on a calm note, but then the world of cybersecurity never has a dull moment. The end of the quarter saw Spring4Shell, another zero-day vulnerability in the Spring Core module of Spring Framework. Learn more about Rapid7 response to this vulnerability and how we are working around the clock to help our customers protect their own environments from Spring4Shell.

Additional reading:

NEVER MISS A BLOG

Get the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.