Post Syndicated from The Atlantic original https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rFDUOVWf5VY
How Republicans Could Respond to Democrats’ Election Wins
Post Syndicated from The Atlantic original https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vEgLC8NitZo
AWS Lambda networking over IPv6
Post Syndicated from John Lee original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/aws-lambda-networking-over-ipv6/
IPv4 address exhaustion is a challenge in modern networking, as most IPv4 addresses have been depleted with the growth of the internet. Previously, AWS Lambda only supported inbound and outbound connectivity over IPv4, but it has since introduced support for dual-stack endpoints, so that you can transition from IPv4 to IPv6. AWS continues to add support for IPv6, recently announcing support for inbound IPv6 connectivity over AWS PrivateLink, and dual-stack endpoint support for Amazon API Gateway.
With these IPv6 capabilities now available in Lambda, you should understand how to use them effectively. This post examines the benefits of transitioning Lambda functions to IPv6, provides practical guidance for implementing dual-stack support in your Lambda environment, and considerations for maintaining compatibility with existing systems during migration.
Benefits of transitioning
You can transition to IPv6 to future-proof your overall architecture by preparing ahead of the broader transition to IPv6, and establish compatibility with IPv6 clients or services. IPv6 also eliminates the need for a NAT gateway when the Lambda functions need internet connectivity from a private subnet in your Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC). Lambda functions can direct traffic to the egress-only internet gateway, potentially eliminating the NAT gateway and its associated charges and streamlining network design. This transition provides cost savings, as egress-only internet gateways are free to use, as opposed to NAT gateways that incurs an hourly charge. Furthermore, IPv6 offers improved network efficiency by eliminating NAT translation overhead, so that Lambda functions can establish direct connections with clients. IPv6 also has more advantages such as native Quality of Service (QoS), which streamlines header structure and reduces packet fragmentations.
Architectural implications
Lambda functions are often deployed inside of a VPC to access VPC resources. For VPC Lambda functions to access the internet, routing traffic through an NAT gateway is a common approach. For Lambda functions with IPv6 support, Lambda functions can now route traffic directly through the egress-only internet gateway, which eliminates the need for a NAT gateway and the extra hop, as shown in the following figures.
Figure 1. Lambda internet connectivity through a NAT Gateway (IPv4) and Lambda internet connectivity through an egress-only internet gateway (IPv6).
Once the egress-only internet gateway is in place, you need to update the route table to reflect this. If you have used 0.0.0.0/0 as the default route for IPv4 traffic, you should add ::/0 as the default route for IPv6 traffic. The following image shows the updated route table.
Figure 2. Lambda private subnet routing tables for an NAT Gateway (IPv4) as opposed to a dual-stack including an egress-only internet gateway (IPv6)
If you are using Lambda function URLs, no transition is needed. Lambda function URLs are inherently IPv6-capable and can be accessed by IPv6 clients without needing architectural changes or modifications. This IPv6 compatibility for function URLs operates independently of your Lambda function’s VPC configuration, and clients can reach your Lambda function URLs over IPv6 even when dual-stack is not enabled in your VPC.
For Lambda functions that interact exclusively with AWS services through internal traffic, IPv6 offers limited benefits. For example, in an architecture where a Lambda function processes requests from Amazon API Gateway and queries a database hosted on Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS), no architectural change is expected. Internal traffic routes using the RDS cluster endpoint and Lambda Amazon Resource Name (ARN), not IP addresses, as shown in the following figure.
Figure 3. A common architecture pattern where Lambda processes events from API Gateway and reads/writes to Amazon RDS. You reference the Lambda function ARN and RDS cluster endpoint instead of IPv4/IPv6 addresses.
Transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6
By default, Lambda functions communicate over IPv4 to their destinations. For Lambda functions to communicate with IPv6 destinations, dual-stack VPC configuration is needed. This allows Lambda functions to communicate over both IPv4 and IPv6.
If your VPC does not have IPv6 support, then you need to first add IPv6 support for your VPC. You need to follow these steps to enable IPv6 traffic for a Lambda function:
- Assign IPv6 block to VPC: You need to edit the existing VPC CIDRs to add an IPv6 CIDR block. If you select the option of Amazon-provided IPv6 CIDR block, then you are assigned a /56 IPv6 CIDR block from the Amazon pool of IPv6 addresses. You also have the option to assign an Amazon VPC IP Address Manager allocated or your own IPv6 CIDR block.
- Assign IPv6 block to Subnets: After assigning an IPv6 CIDR block to the VPC, you must manually configure IPv6 CIDR blocks for each existing subnet, with each subnet receiving a portion of the VPC’s IPv6 address space.
- Update route tables: For your Lambda function’s IPv6 traffic to reach the internet, you need to add a route (::/0) to the egress-only internet gateway.
- Update security groups: By default, security groups allow all outbound traffic. To restrict outbound IPv6 traffic from your Lambda function, you must remove the default egress rule and add specific restrictive outbound rules. For inbound traffic, security group rules are needed when your Lambda function receives direct network connections, such as traffic through AWS PrivateLink connections.
- Enable IPv6 dual-stack on the Lambda function: When you assign IPv6 addresses for your Lambda function’s subnet, you can enable IPv6 dual-stack for the Lambda function. Then, Lambda creates new Elastic network interfaces (ENI) with IPv4 and IPv6 protocols with both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Although most updates to the Lambda function have zero downtime, enabling dual-stack may cause disruption in connectivity. To prevent downtime during the transition, we recommend using Lambda versions and aliases to implement a blue/green deployment strategy. You can publish your IPv6-enabled Lambda function as a new version while keeping the current version active and serve traffic through the alias. After testing the new IPv6 version, you can update the alias to switch the traffic. This approach provides a rollback capability, and you can revert the alias to point back to the previous version if needed.
When you have completed these steps, your Lambda function can support dual-stack networking and communicate over both IPv4 and IPv6.
Conclusion
In this post, we covered the benefits of transitioning your AWS Lambda functions from IPv4 to IPv6, the architectural implications, and steps for how you could make the transition.We recommend transitioning your Lambda functions to support both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic to gain its benefits. The Lambda IPv6 support helps address IPv4 exhaustion while providing cost savings and network clarification. Once organizations transition to supporting only IPv6 traffic, they can eliminate NAT gateways for Lambda functions needing internet access, thus reducing both costs and architectural complexity. As AWS expands IPv6 support across services, transitioning Lambda functions to dual-stack networking positions organizations for long-term compatibility while delivering immediate operational benefits.
For more information on how to enable IPv6 access for Lambda functions in dual-stack VPC, see the Lambda documentation. For more serverless learning resources, visit Serverless Land.
Friday Squid Blogging: Squid Game: The Challenge, Season Two
Post Syndicated from Bruce Schneier original https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2025/11/friday-squid-blogging-squid-game-the-challenge-season-two.html
The second season of the Netflix reality competition show Squid Game: The Challenge has dropped. (Too many links to pick a few—search for it.)
As usual, you can also use this squid post to talk about the security stories in the news that I haven’t covered.
Metasploit Wrap-Up 11/07/2025
Post Syndicated from Marcin Walas original https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/pt-metasploit-wrap-up-11-07-2025
New module content (3)
Centreon authenticated command injection leading to RCE via broker engine “reload” parameter
Author: h00die-gr3y [email protected]
Type: Exploit
Pull request: #20672 contributed by h00die-gr3y
Path: linux/http/centreon_auth_rce_cve_2025_5946
AttackerKB reference: CVE-2025-5946
Description: Adds an exploit module for Centreon. The vulnerability, an authenticated command injection, will lead to a remote code execution.
Rootkit Privilege Escalation Signal Hunter
Author: bcoles [email protected]
Type: Exploit
Pull request: #20643 contributed by bcoles
Path: linux/local/rootkit_privesc_signal_hunter
Description: Expands diamorphine privilege escalation module to other rootkits that use signal handling for privilege escalation.
Windows Persistent Task Scheduler
Author: h00die
Type: Exploit
Pull request: #20660 contributed by h00die
Path: windows/persistence/task_scheduler
Description: This adds a new persistence module for Windows – the task scheduler module. The module will create scheduled tasks depending on the ScheduleType option.
Enhancements and features (2)
- #20523 from h00die – This updates the upstart persistence to use the new persistence mixin.
- #20643 from bcoles – Expands diamorphine privilege escalation module to other rootkits, which use signal handling for privilege escalation.
Bugs fixed (1)
- #20673 from adfoster-r7 – Temporarily pins date dependency to 3.4.1 due to possible issues associated with 3.5.0 to allow for further testing.
Documentation
You can find the latest Metasploit documentation on our docsite at docs.metasploit.com.
Get it
As always, you can update to the latest Metasploit Framework with msfupdate and you can get more details on the changes since the last blog post from GitHub:
If you are a git user, you can clone the Metasploit Framework repo (master branch) for the latest. To install fresh without using git, you can use the open-source-only Nightly Installers or the commercial edition Metasploit Pro
5 Tools to Integrate Object Storage and Kubernetes
Post Syndicated from Maddie Presland original https://www.backblaze.com/blog/5-tools-to-integrate-object-storage-and-kubernetes/

It’s no secret that Kubernetes is the de facto container orchestrator for scaling containerized applications. As the Backblaze team gets ready to head to KubeCon North America, we’ve been exploring the ecosystem of tools and integrations that make it easier to store application data in S3 compatible object storage.
From workarounds that make an object storage bucket behave like a persistent volume to cluster backups and early Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) storage projects we’re excited to watch, here’s a quick guide to making object storage services like Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage work (as close to) seamlessly with your Kubernetes clusters.
Mountpoint for Amazon S3 CSI Driver
AWS Labs released the mountpoint for Amazon S3 container storage interface (CSI) driver to allow Kubernetes clusters to access files in object storage through a file system interface. Essentially, this mountpoint disguises S3 compatible object storage as a persistent storage volume so the Kubernetes cluster can access your object storage without the need for another tool or integration. This also works with other S3 compatible storage services, including Backblaze B2. Check out our GitHub repo for step by step instructions on how to deploy a sample application to test with B2, or see this in action during our upcoming webinar, The State of K8s + S3 Compatible Storage.
MinIO
MinIO is a popular tool for running object storage natively inside Kubernetes clusters, by exposing data through standard APIs to enable containerized application to store, retrieve, and manage unstructured data. MinIO designed to run natively in Kubernetes, and allows you to bring-your-own S3 compatible storage or use your device’s local storage for a self-hosted solution. MinIO is flexible enough for individual developers to experiment with, but its power comes from its scalability, with 77% of Fortune 500 companies using MinIO in their cloud native workloads.
Velero
Rapidly creating and deleting infrastructure, and being able to quickly rebuild and recover are core tenets of Kubernetes. Velero makes it incredibly easy to back up Kubernetes clusters to your preferred object storage service. Run one-off backups as needed with one simple command, or set up a schedule to make sure your clusters are backed up consistently.
Read more about Kubernetes cluster security and backup strategy.
Rook
Rook is a storage orchestrator for Kubernetes that manages distributed storage systems (including Ceph and Cassandra) as native Kubernetes resources. Though Rook’s functionality doesn’t directly extend to S3 compatible object storage like Backblaze B2, you can mirror the data to B2 or set up your preferred object storage service as a backup destination.
Container Object Storage Interface (COSI) (Currently available in Alpha)
The COSI project is a set of abstractions currently available in Alpha that aims to provide Kubernetes with the ability to request and provision object storage buckets from multiple cloud vendors, similar to how file/block storage is abstracted with the CSI driver. Since each cloud provider builds out object storage differently, COSI intends to provide a unified set of protocols so Kubernetes can be inclusive to all object storage vendors, and adhere to the Kubernetes portability tenet.
Learn more about these tools, see a demo of how to attach a Backblaze B2 bucket via the mountpoint for Amazon S3 CSI driver, and get some initial key takeaways from KubeCon North America during our upcoming webinar, The State of K8s + S3 Compatible Storage. Register to watch live on November 20, 2025 and get access to an on-demand recording.
The post 5 Tools to Integrate Object Storage and Kubernetes appeared first on Backblaze Blog | Cloud Storage & Cloud Backup
[$] Bootc for workstation use
Post Syndicated from jzb original https://lwn.net/Articles/1042708/
The bootc project allows users to
create a bootable Linux system image using the container tooling that many
developers are already familiar with. It is an evolution of OSTree
(now called libostree), which is used to create Fedora
Silverblue and other image-based distributions. While creating
custom images is still a job for experts, the container technology
simplifies delivering heavily customized images to non-technical
users.
Ubiquiti UniFi Cloud Gateway Fiber UCG-Fiber Review
Post Syndicated from Patrick Kennedy original https://www.servethehome.com/ubiquiti-unifi-cloud-gateway-fiber-ucg-fiber-review/
We take our $1 million traffic generator and more to deep-dive into the popular $279 Ubiquiti UCG-Fiber gateway device. Check it out
The post Ubiquiti UniFi Cloud Gateway Fiber UCG-Fiber Review appeared first on ServeTheHome.
Security updates for Friday
Post Syndicated from jzb original https://lwn.net/Articles/1045612/
Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (bind, bind9.16, libsoup, mariadb:10.5, and sssd), Debian (chromium, keystone, and swift), Fedora (apptainer, buildah, chromium, fcitx5, fcitx5-anthy, fcitx5-chewing, fcitx5-chinese-addons, fcitx5-configtool, fcitx5-hangul, fcitx5-kkc, fcitx5-libthai, fcitx5-m17n, fcitx5-qt, fcitx5-rime, fcitx5-sayura, fcitx5-skk, fcitx5-table-extra, fcitx5-unikey, fcitx5-zhuyin, GeographicLib, libime, mbedtls, mingw-poppler, mupen64plus, python-starlette, webkitgtk, and xen), Mageia (dcmtk, java-1.8.0-openjdk, java-11-openjdk, java-17-openjdk, java-latest-openjdk, libvpx, and sqlite3), Oracle (bind, bind9.16, kernel, libsoup, libsoup3, osbuild-composer, qt6-qtsvg, sssd, and valkey), Red Hat (kernel and kernel-rt), SUSE (bind, gpg2, ImageMagick, python-Django, and runc), and Ubuntu (linux-azure, linux-azure-4.15, linux-fips, linux-aws-fips, inux-gcp-fips, linux-gcp, linux-gcp-6.8, linux-gke, linux-intel-iot-realtime, linux-realtime, linux-raspi-5.4, and linux-realtime, linux-realtime-6.8).
Threat Landscape of the Building and Construction Sector, Part One: Initial Access, Supply Chain, and the Internet of Things
Post Syndicated from Jeremy Makowski original https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-building-construction-sector-threat-landscape-initial-access-supply-chain-iot
In 2025, the construction industry stands at the crossroads of digital transformation and evolving cybersecurity risks, making it a prime target for threat actors. Cyber adversaries, including ransomware operators, organized cybercriminal networks, and state-sponsored APT groups from countries such as China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, are increasingly focusing their attacks on the building and construction sector.
These actors exploit the industry’s growing dependence on vulnerable IoT‑enabled heavy machinery, Building Information Modeling (BIM) systems, and cloud‑based project management platforms.
Ransomware campaigns designed to disrupt project timelines, supply chain attacks exploiting third‑party software and equipment vendors, and social engineering schemes targeting on‑site personnel pose substantial operational and financial risks. Compounding this, data privacy mandates and regulatory scrutiny have intensified globally, pressing construction companies to implement robust cybersecurity measures.
In this two-part series, Rapid7 is looking at the threats the construction industry faces, how threat actors are entering their networks, and the most common vulnerabilities construction industry security professionals should remediate now.
⠀
Initial access and data leaks
The construction sector faces escalating cyber threats as rapid digital transformation and heavy reliance on third-party vendors expose firms to new vulnerabilities. Cybercriminals increasingly target construction companies for initial access and data leaks, exploiting weak security practices, outdated legacy systems, and widespread use of cloud-based project management tools. Attackers commonly employ phishing email messages, compromised credentials, and supply chain attacks, taking advantage of insufficient employee training and lax vendor risk management.
Notably, gaining initial access to a corporate network can be resource-intensive, prompting many threat actors to seek more accessible routes: purchasing access from underground forums where intermediaries and brokers sell credentials to previously breached networks across all industries, including construction. Access types traded, such as VPN, RDP, SSH, Citrix, SMTP, and FTP, are priced based on the target’s size and network complexity.
Once inside, cybercriminals leverage interconnected systems to move laterally and exfiltrate valuable data, including blueprints, contracts, financial records, and personal information. The complex, collaborative nature of construction projects and the frequent exchange of sensitive documents amplify the risk, making the sector a prime target for corporate espionage, financial gain, and extortion through ransomware. This evolving threat landscape underscores the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures and comprehensive vendor risk management within the industry.
⠀

Construction company network access for sale on the dark web
⠀

VPN/RDP/Cpanel access to a construction company for sale on the dark web
⠀
Social engineering and phishing campaigns
Social engineering and phishing campaigns are particularly effective in the building and construction industry as attackers exploit the industry’s workflow and human vulnerabilities. Cybercriminals frequently use phishing emails, SMS messages, and phone calls to impersonate project managers, suppliers, or executives. These communications often appear urgent, requesting immediate payment, sensitive information, or login credentials, making them difficult for busy staff to ignore.
Common attack vectors
-
Vendor impersonation: Attackers pose as legitimate suppliers to request changes in payment details or deliver fake invoices, exploiting the sector’s reliance on a broad network of subcontractors and vendors.
-
Executive impersonation (“CEO fraud”): Criminals spoof senior management to pressure employees into transferring funds or divulging confidential information.
-
Malicious attachments and links: Phishing messages often contain fake contracts, blueprints, or project documents, which, when opened, compromise credentials or deploy malware.
-
Compromised trusted platforms: Attackers exploit open redirects or compromised accounts on construction management tools to distribute phishing links that bypass basic email security checks.
Due to several unique operational challenges, the building and construction sector is particularly vulnerable to social engineering and phishing attacks. A dispersed and mobile workforce, with employees often working remotely or across multiple job sites, makes it challenging to verify unexpected requests or consult with IT and security teams in real time.
The urgency to complete high-value transactions under tight project deadlines can encourage employees to bypass verification procedures and overlook warning signs of suspicious communications. Additionally, the sector’s complex supply chains, which involve frequent interactions with unfamiliar subcontractors, provide ample opportunities for attackers to infiltrate ongoing conversations unnoticed.
This risk is compounded by varying levels of cybersecurity awareness among employees, particularly in smaller firms where consistent training is less common. These factors make the industry an attractive target for attackers and highlight the critical need for enhanced employee awareness, rigorous verification processes, and sector-specific cybersecurity measures.
Supply chain and third‑party risks
The construction sector’s dependence on a vast network of subcontractors, vendors, and technology providers has intensified its exposure to supply chain and third‑party cyber threats. Construction projects often involve dozens, sometimes hundreds, of different partners, each bringing their systems and security practices to the table. Unlike more centralized industries, construction companies rarely have complete visibility or control over the cybersecurity standards of every third party involved.
This lack of uniformity creates significant blind spots that attackers can exploit. For example, a breach within a third-party software update or a compromised equipment supplier can quickly propagate throughout an entire project, causing costly delays, data loss, or operational paralysis.
With tight deadlines and complex, geographically dispersed operations, construction firms may deprioritize cybersecurity vetting in favor of speed and cost, further compounding their risk. Effective mitigation now demands ongoing risk assessments, precise contractual cybersecurity requirements for all partners, real-time monitoring, and a collaborative approach to incident response, ensuring vulnerabilities are identified and addressed before they can impact critical projects.
⠀
Emerging threats: The Internet of Things (IoT) and Building Information Modeling (BIM)
The rapid adoption of IoT‑enabled machinery and Building Information Modeling (BIM) has transformed the construction landscape, enhancing efficiency and collaboration across project teams. However, these advances have also created new and unique points of vulnerability.
The sector’s use of connected devices such as smart cranes, on-site sensors, and drones often operate in environments where cybersecurity is not traditionally a primary concern, and where devices may be physically accessible to outsiders or not consistently updated. Many IoT devices lack built-in security features, making them easy entry points for cyberattacks that could disrupt operations or threaten worker safety.
Similarly, BIM platforms that centralize and share sensitive design and project data are now high-value targets, as a single compromise can reveal blueprints, project timelines, and operational details to attackers. Construction firms are particularly at risk because project sites frequently change, IT resources may be stretched thin, and digital assets are constantly being moved and accessed by different parties.
Protecting these new technologies requires a shift in mindset: from viewing cybersecurity as a back-office concern to treating it as an essential component of on-site and digital operations, including secure device management, strong access controls, regular updates, and robust encryption practices.
Key threats and vulnerable points in IoT and BIM for construction:
-
IoT device vulnerabilities:
-
Weak authentication: Many IoT devices use default or weak passwords, making unauthorized access easier.
-
Unpatched firmware: Devices often lack regular updates, leaving known vulnerabilities open to exploitation.
-
Physical access risks: Construction sites are less secure environments, allowing attackers to tamper with or steal devices.
-
Insecure communication protocols: Data sent between IoT devices and central systems may be unencrypted or poorly secured, exposing sensitive information.
-
BIM threats:
Centralized data breaches: BIM platforms hold all project data in one place so that a single breach can expose blueprints, schedules, and operational details. -
Unauthorized access: Weak access controls or shared credentials can let unauthorized users download, alter, or leak sensitive project files.
-
Third-party collaboration risks: Multiple subcontractors or vendors may have access to BIM, increasing the risk of compromised accounts or insider threats.
⠀
Taking proactive steps to enhance cybersecurity
As the building and construction industry digitalizes, strengthening cybersecurity has become a business-critical priority. The following strategies address the sector’s unique challenges and offer a roadmap for reducing cyber risk.
Elevate cybersecurity to a core business priority
Historically, cybersecurity has been an afterthought in many construction firms. To change this, leadership must treat cybersecurity as essential to project delivery and business continuity. This requires investing in dedicated IT security staff, integrating cybersecurity into board-level discussions, and establishing clear policies for digital risk management throughout the organization.
Secure the digital supply chain
Given the sector’s reliance on a complex network of subcontractors and vendors, assessing and strengthening supply chain security is crucial. Firms should require vendors to meet baseline cybersecurity standards, conduct regular audits of third-party security practices, and ensure that project documents and data are shared through secure and encrypted channels. Construction companies can reduce the risk of supply chain-based attacks by holding all partners to strong security protocols.
Upgrade and harden legacy systems
Outdated software and systems remain prime targets for cybercriminals. Construction companies must thoroughly assess their IT environments, identify and replace unsupported or vulnerable technologies, and maintain a regular schedule of software updates and patching. Modern firewalls and endpoint protection further help to close critical security gaps.
Protect IoT devices and smart technology
Securing these devices is essential with the rapid adoption of IoT sensors, connected machinery, and advanced project management platforms. This means changing default passwords, disabling unnecessary services, and keeping IoT devices on networks separate from core business systems. Ongoing monitoring for unauthorized access or unusual activity helps to detect and respond to threats targeting these new endpoints.
Foster a security-aware culture
Human error is still a leading cause of cyber incidents, so regular cybersecurity training should be mandatory for all employees and contractors. Staff should be equipped to recognize phishing attempts, follow secure password practices, and report security incidents. Construction firms can strengthen their defense by building a culture where everyone understands their role in protecting digital assets.
Safeguard sensitive data and intellectual property
Protecting sensitive information such as blueprints, bids, client data, and proprietary designs is crucial. Data should be encrypted at rest and in transit, with strict access controls and permissions. Regular data backups and recovery testing are also important, along with using secure platforms for managing and sharing documents. These measures help prevent unauthorized access, data loss, and reputational harm.
As the industry reckons with its expanding digital footprint, understanding and mitigating the unique tactics and motivations of these threat actors in 2025 is prudent and imperative for ensuring project continuity, workforce safety, and reputational resilience.
In the concluding installment of this two-part series, Rapid7 will look at how ransomware actors exploit many of the same weaknesses mentioned here. Stay tuned.
DIY BYOIP: a new way to Bring Your Own IP prefixes to Cloudflare
Post Syndicated from Ash Pallarito original https://blog.cloudflare.com/diy-byoip/
When a customer wants to bring IP address space to Cloudflare, they’ve always had to reach out to their account team to put in a request. This request would then be sent to various Cloudflare engineering teams such as addressing and network engineering — and then the team responsible for the particular service they wanted to use the prefix with (e.g., CDN, Magic Transit, Spectrum, Egress). In addition, they had to work with their own legal teams and potentially another organization if they did not have primary ownership of an IP prefix in order to get a Letter of Agency (LOA) issued through hoops of approvals. This process is complex, manual, and time-consuming for all parties involved — sometimes taking up to 4–6 weeks depending on various approvals.
Well, no longer! Today, we are pleased to announce the launch of our self-serve BYOIP API, which enables our customers to onboard and set up their BYOIP prefixes themselves.
With self-serve, we handle the bureaucracy for you. We have automated this process using the gold standard for routing security — the Resource Public Key Infrastructure, RPKI. All the while, we continue to ensure the best quality of service by generating LOAs on our customers’ behalf, based on the security guarantees of our new ownership validation process. This ensures that customer routes continue to be accepted in every corner of the Internet.
Cloudflare takes the security and stability of the whole Internet very seriously. RPKI is a cryptographically-strong authorization mechanism and is, we believe, substantially more reliable than common practice which relies upon human review of scanned documents. However, deployment and availability of some RPKI-signed artifacts like the AS Path Authorisation (ASPA) object remains limited, and for that reason we are limiting the initial scope of self-serve onboarding to BYOIP prefixes originated from Cloudflare’s autonomous system number (ASN) AS 13335. By doing this, we only need to rely on the publication of Route Origin Authorisation (ROA) objects, which are widely available. This approach has the advantage of being safe for the Internet and also meeting the needs of most of our BYOIP customers.
Today, we take a major step forward in offering customers a more comprehensive IP address management (IPAM) platform. With the recent update to enable multiple services on a single BYOIP prefix and this latest advancement to enable self-serve onboarding via our API, we hope customers feel empowered to take control of their IPs on our network.
We want Cloudflare to feel like an extension of your infrastructure, which is why we originally launched Bring-Your-Own-IP (BYOIP) back in 2020.
A quick refresher: Bring-your-own-IP is named for exactly what it does – it allows customers to bring their own IP space to Cloudflare. Customers choose BYOIP for a number of reasons, but the main reasons are control and configurability. An IP prefix is a range or block of IP addresses. Routers create a table of reachable prefixes, known as a routing table, to ensure that packets are delivered correctly across the Internet. When a customer’s Cloudflare services are configured to use the customer’s own addresses, onboarded to Cloudflare as BYOIP, a packet with a corresponding destination address will be routed across the Internet to Cloudflare’s global edge network, where it will be received and processed. BYOIP can be used with our Layer 7 services, Spectrum, or Magic Transit.
Let’s take a step back and take a look at the state of the BYOIP world right now. Let’s say a customer has authority over a range of IP addresses, and they’d like to bring them to Cloudflare. We require customers to provide us with a Letter of Authorization (LOA) and have an Internet Routing Registry (IRR) record matching their prefix and ASN. Once we have this, we require manual review by a Cloudflare engineer. There are a few issues with this process:
-
Insecure: The LOA is just a document—a piece of paper. The security of this method rests entirely on the diligence of the engineer reviewing the document. If the review is not able to detect that a document is fraudulent or inaccurate, it is possible for a prefix or ASN to be hijacked.
-
Time-consuming: Generating a single LOA is not always sufficient. If you are leasing IP space, we will ask you to provide documentation confirming that relationship as well, so that we can see a clear chain of authorisation from the original assignment or allocation of addresses to you. Getting all the paper documents to verify this chain of ownership, combined with having to wait for manual review can result in weeks of waiting to deploy a prefix!
Moving to a self-serve model allowed us to rethink the manner in which we conduct prefix ownership checks. We asked ourselves: How can we quickly, securely, and automatically prove you are authorized to use your IP prefix and intend to route it through Cloudflare?
We ended up killing two birds with one stone, thanks to our two-step process involving the creation of an RPKI ROA (verification of intent) and modification of IRR or rDNS records (verification of ownership). Self-serve unlocks the ability to not only onboard prefixes more quickly and without human intervention, but also exercises more rigorous ownership checks than a simple scanned document ever could. While not 100% foolproof, it is a significant improvement in the way we verify ownership.
Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) are the organizations responsible for distributing and managing Internet number resources like IP addresses. They are composed of 5 different entities operating in different regions of the world (RIRs). Originally allocated address space from the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), they in turn assign and allocate that IP space to Local Internet Registries (LIRs) like ISPs.
This process is based on RIR policies which generally look at things like legal documentation, existing database/registry records, technical contacts, and BGP information. End-users can obtain addresses from an LIR, or in some cases through an RIR directly. As IPv4 addresses have become more scarce, brokerage services have been launched to allow addresses to be leased for fixed periods from their original assignees.
The Internet Routing Registry (IRR) is a separate system that focuses on routing rather than address assignment. Many organisations operate IRR instances and allow routing information to be published, including all five RIRs. While most IRR instances impose few barriers to the publication of routing data, those that are operated by RIRs are capable of linking the ability to publish routing information with the organisations to which the corresponding addresses have been assigned. We believe that being able to modify an IRR record protected in this way provides a good signal that a user has the rights to use a prefix.
Example of a route object containing validation token (using the documentation-only address 192.0.2.0/24):
% whois -h rr.arin.net 192.0.2.0/24
route: 192.0.2.0/24
origin: AS13335
descr: Example Company, Inc.
cf-validation: 9477b6c3-4344-4ceb-85c4-6463e7d2453f
admin-c: ADMIN2521-ARIN
tech-c: ADMIN2521-ARIN
tech-c: CLOUD146-ARIN
mnt-by: MNT-CLOUD14
created: 2025-07-29T10:52:27Z
last-modified: 2025-07-29T10:52:27Z
source: ARIN
For those that don’t want to go through the process of IRR-based validation, reverse DNS (rDNS) is provided as another secure method of verification. To manage rDNS for a prefix — whether it’s creating a PTR record or a security TXT record — you must be granted permission by the entity that allocated the IP block in the first place (usually your ISP or the RIR).
This permission is demonstrated in one of two ways:
-
Directly through the IP owner’s authenticated customer portal (ISP/RIR).
-
By the IP owner delegating authority to your third-party DNS provider via an NS record for your reverse zone.
Example of a reverse domain lookup using dig command (using the documentation-only address 192.0.2.0/24):
% dig cf-validation.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa TXT
; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cf-validation.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa TXT
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 16686
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;cf-validation.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION:
cf-validation.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa. 300 IN TXT "b2f8af96-d32d-4c46-a886-f97d925d7977"
;; Query time: 35 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.2.2#53(127.0.2.2)
;; WHEN: Fri Oct 24 10:43:52 EDT 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 150
So how exactly is one supposed to modify these records? That’s where the validation token comes into play. Once you choose either the IRR or Reverse DNS method, we provide a unique, single-use validation token. You must add this token to the content of the relevant record, either in the IRR or in the DNS. Our system then looks for the presence of the token as evidence that the request is being made by someone with authorization to make the requested modification. If the token is found, verification is complete and your ownership is confirmed!
Ownership is only half the battle; we also need to confirm your intention that you authorize Cloudflare to advertise your prefix. For this, we rely on the gold standard for routing security: the Resource Private Key Infrastructure (RPKI), and in particular Route Origin Authorization (ROA) objects.
A ROA is a cryptographically-signed document that specifies which Autonomous System Number (ASN) is authorized to originate your IP prefix. You can think of a ROA as the digital equivalent of a certified, signed, and notarised contract from the owner of the prefix.
Relying parties can validate the signatures in a ROA using the RPKI.You simply create a ROA that specifies Cloudflare’s ASN (AS13335) as an authorized originator and arrange for it to be signed. Many of our customers used hosted RPKI systems available through RIR portals for this. When our systems detect this signed authorization, your routing intention is instantly confirmed.
Many other companies that support BYOIP require a complex workflow involving creating self-signed certificates and manually modifying RDAP (Registration Data Access Protocol) records—a heavy administrative lift. By embracing a choice of IRR object modification and Reverse DNS TXT records, combined with RPKI, we offer a verification process that is much more familiar and straightforward for existing network operators.
While the new self-serve flow ditches the need for the “dinosaur relic” that is the LOA, many network operators around the world still rely on it as part of the process of accepting prefixes from other networks.
To help ensure your prefix is accepted by adjacent networks globally, Cloudflare automatically generates a document on your behalf to be distributed in place of a LOA. This document provides information about the checks that we have carried out to confirm that we are authorised to originate the customer prefix, and confirms the presence of valid ROAs to authorise our origination of it. In this way we are able to support the workflows of network operators we connect to who rely upon LOAs, without our customers having the burden of generating them.

One concern in designing the Self-Serve API is the trade-off between giving customers flexibility while implementing the necessary safeguards so that an IP prefix is never advertised without a matching service binding. If this were to happen, Cloudflare would be advertising a prefix with no idea on what to do with the traffic when we receive it! We call this “blackholing” traffic. To handle this, we introduced the requirement of a default service binding — i.e. a service binding that spans the entire range of the IP prefix onboarded.
A customer can later layer different service bindings on top of their default service binding via multiple service bindings, like putting CDN on top of a default Spectrum service binding. This way, a prefix can never be advertised without a service binding and blackhole our customers’ traffic.

Check out our developer docs on the most up-to-date documentation on how to onboard, advertise, and add services to your IP prefixes via our API. Remember that onboardings can be complex, and don’t hesitate to ask questions or reach out to our professional services team if you’d like us to do it for you.
The ability to script and integrate BYOIP management into existing workflows is a game-changer for modern network operations, and we’re only just getting started. In the months ahead, look for self-serve BYOIP in the dashboard, as well as self-serve BYOIP offboarding to give customers even more control.
Cloudflare’s self-serve BYOIP API onboarding empowers customers with unprecedented control and flexibility over their IP assets. This move to automate onboarding empowers a stronger security posture, moving away from manually-reviewed PDFs and driving RPKI adoption. By using these API calls, organizations can automate complex network tasks, streamline migrations, and build more resilient and agile network infrastructures.
А ти готов ли си да се биеш за демокрацията?
Post Syndicated from Емилия Милчева original https://www.toest.bg/a-ti-gotov-li-si-da-se-biesh-za-demokratsiyata/

Демокрацията в България става фронтова линия. Но в държавата живеят 1,5 милиона души, готови да я защитят. Наистина ли има такова ядро на гражданска устойчивост срещу авторитарни тенденции, както установява проучване на Институт „Отворено общество“…
Защото тази седмица с гласовете на 111 народни представители българският парламент създаде временна комисия за разследване на дейността на филантропа Джордж Сорос и Александър Сорос и на техните фондации на територията на България. Предложи го олигархо-политикът Делян Пеевски, а инициативата подкрепиха неговите депутати от ДПС – Ново начало, „Възраждане“, БСП – Обединена левица, „Има такъв народ“, МЕЧ, „Величие“ и независимите депутати. Липсващите в залата 17 народни представители от ПП–ДБ и ГЕРБ го „позволиха“ (петима от ГЕРБ, девет от „Продължаваме промяната“, трима от „Демократична България“).
Останалите от ГЕРБ, от ПП–ДБ и от групата на Ахмед Доган, които се възпротивиха на предложението, не успяха да надделеят. Макар да беше известно какво предстои в дневния ред, случайно или не от залата отсъстваха знакови имена, като лидера на ГЕРБ Бойко Борисов, на ПП – Асен Василев и още петима от Изпълнителната комисия на партията.
Но във временната комисия ГЕРБ ще подкрепи Сорос. Гарантирано от Борисов, който в зала не се осмели да гласува срещу предложението на Пеевски.
Аз самият се познавам лично със Сорос, срещал съм се с него и ще продължа да го подкрепям, защото много неща в демокрацията, които прави, аз ги одобрявам, харесвам и заедно сме ги правили.
Бойко Борисов не е конкретизирал каква демокрация е строил заедно със Сорос. За няколкото тухли, които е вложил в българската, сигурно му е възложено с инхаус процедура. За Сорос е известно какво е правил – за повече от три десетилетия създадената от него Open Society Foundations е вложила 24,2 млрд. долара в своите програми.
Временната комисия ще разследва какво е правила организацията в България. Същата тази организация, в чиито управителни съвети са били български интелектуалци като Блага Димитрова, Борис Христов, проф. Богдан Богданов, Йордан Радичков и др. А парадоксалното е, че Пеевски, който ръководи партия с гласоподаватели от етническите малцинства, организира тази кампания.
Парадоксално е, че партията на Делян Пеевски, която е в парламента благодарение в най-голяма степен на гласовете на хора от малцинствата повежда мракобесна кампания на лов за вещици срещу големия филантроп Джордж Сорос и неговите партньори в България. Важни инициативи в подкрепа на културата и образованието на бесарабските българи бяха осъществени със средства на Сорос. По време на голямата икономическа криза в България през първата половина на 1997 г. Сорос отдели 10 млн. долара за благотворителни цели.
Михаил Иванов, съветник по етническите въпроси на президента Желев
Но изглежда, че санкционираният от Вашингтон по Глобалния закон „Магнитски“ Делян Пеевски иска да покаже, че следва презокеанските повели. Американският президент Тръмп заплашва с репресии либерални неправителствени организации и групи, противопоставящи се на неговия дневен ред. За целта администрацията му планира да използва американския апарат за борба с тероризма, включително ФБР, Министерството на вътрешната сигурност и Министерството на правосъдието, както и Службата за вътрешни приходи (IRS) и Министерството на финансите срещу определени леви групи, които обвинява, че финансират и организират политическо насилие.
Агенция „Ройтерс“ разговаря с трима представители на Белия дом, четирима служители от Министерството на вътрешната сигурност и един представител на Министерството на правосъдието, за да изготви първия цялостен отчет за това как се вземат решенията, как се разполагат силите и как се координират операциите в рамките на тази кампания за репресии.
Познато. По подобен начин в България са използвани прокуратурата, службите и Комисията за противодействие на корупцията за смазване на вътрешни опоненти. По същия начин действа в Унгария и близкият до Тръмп Орбан.
Това е само началото
Ами ако предложението не беше за създаване на тази смехотворна комисия, в която има пропаганда, но не и смисъл? Ами ако тази антиевропейска и проруска клика в 51-вия парламент, част от която е в управляващата коалиция, а друга е номинална опозиция, предлагаше всички либерално мислещи хора да бъдат сегрегирани и водени на специален отчет от службите? Абсурд, ще възразят някои, това е манипулативен въпрос. Но Народното събрание прие достатъчно абсурди, като изучаване на религия в светските училища с бонус „добродетели“, също и забрана на онова, което забраняващите определят с пропагандния неологизъм „джендър пропаганда“.
Този термин не описва реална социална практика, но пък служи за идеологическа и главно морална мобилизация срещу либерални ценности, граждански права, Запада. В българския контекст беше внедрен след дебатите около Истанбулската конвенция през 2018 г. и се превърна в символен маркер на антиевропейски и антидемократични наративи. Изглежда като лошо преписано копие на закона срещу гей пропагандата в Русия, приет през 2013 г.
Така че онези, които биха защитили демокрацията, със сигурност са европейци по дух, либерали по убеждения и граждани по съвест.
Когато една власт става все по-авторитарна и мракобесна, тя атакува най-напред гражданските организации, образованието, медиите. После идва редът на всички останали и накрая… помним онези стихове на Мартин Нимьолер:
Когато дойдоха за мен –
вече не бяха останали хора,
които да ме защитят.„Когато нацистите дойдоха за мен“, превод Борис Борисов и Александър Ножаров
Онези, които протестират
Данните за обществените нагласи към демокрацията в България през 2025 г. дават известен оптимизъм за състоянието на българското общество – всеки трети българин (33%) е готов да рискува личната си сигурност в защита на демокрацията, а всеки пети (20%) би се записал като доброволец при война.
33% от анкетираните заявяват, че биха защитили демокрацията с цената на личната си сигурност, а 28% биха го направили дори ако станат обект на очерняща кампания.
Тези дялове означават, че приблизително един милион и 500 хиляди български граждани на декларативно ниво са готови да поемат лични рискове, за да защитят демократичния ред в страната.
Доклад „Обществени нагласи към демокрацията в България 2025“ на „Отворено общество“
Това са хора, които биха се записали като доброволци, които няма да избягат, ако автократизмът се засили, нито пък ще изберат конформизма и амнезията.
На фона на политическата фрагментация, разочарованието от институциите и спада в доверието към парламентарната демокрация, тези данни са особено ценни. България има ядро от активни хора, макар и малцинство, с висока степен на гражданска осъзнатост. Тези хора няма да предадат каузите, дори да се разочароват от лидерите си.
Изследването показва, че те са представители на две възрастови групи – по-стари и по-млади. Хората между 45 и 59 години са най-активните защитници на демокрацията – 41% от тях заявяват подобна готовност при 33% средно за страната. Те са основните носители на демократична култура. Тази възрастова група и най-младите, на възраст 18–29 години, по-често от останалите заявяват готовност да станат доброволци в случай на война.
Поколението между 45 и 59 години знае какво е живот без демокрация, има спомени от тоталитарния режим преди 1989 г., преживяло е Прехода и първите покълнали надежди за демокрация и днес усеща реалната заплаха от връщане назад. Точно това поколение знае, че демокрацията не е даденост, а нещо, което се губи постепенно – чрез институционално овладяване, цензура и натиск над гражданското общество. По БНР изпълнителният директор на „Отворено общество“ Георги Стойчев го обяснява така:
Те имат много ярък спомен за това какво е да се живее в недемократично общество, и са прекарали по-голямата част от съзнателния си живот в рамките на една изграждаща се демокрация. Фактът, че те могат да сравнят живота в демокрация и извън демокрация, според мен е едно от логичните обяснения за готовността на това поколение в по-голяма степен да защитава демокрацията.
Младите хора (18–29 г.), израснали в българската почтидемокрация, не са така убедени и няма само една причина за тази неготовност. Те не притежават личен исторически опит, а гражданското образование в училищата е твърде слабо. Развили са цинизъм към политиката и незаинтересованост, присъща на възрастните – „всички са еднакви“, „нищо не зависи от мен“. Освен това техните източници на информация са предимно социалните мрежи, а там властелини са емоционалните и конспиративните наративи.
Разривът между поколенията е видим. По-опасното е, че той е сигнал за рискове пред устойчивостта на демократичната култура в бъдеще.
Мисия „Лондон“
Докато за едни българи демокрацията е лична отговорност, за други е политическа фасада. Не е лесна за поддържане, особено когато всичките ти коалиционни партньори са подкрепили временната комисия срещу Сорос заедно с прононсираните проруски и евроскептични партии.
Борисов има богат строителен опит – не с демокрацията, а с нейното подкопаване.
Тази седмица той призна, или по-скоро информира (като че се разбира от само себе си), че лично е лобирал пред високопоставени представители на Великобритания за отпадане на санкциите срещу Делян Пеевски, наложени му заради значима корупция. Тоест докато едни българи са готови да рискуват личната си сигурност, за да защитят демокрацията, други, които се кълнат в нея, са готови да рискуват репутацията на държавата, за да защитят корупцията. Бойко Борисов не вярва, че Пеевски е продавал паспорти, и още през 2021 г., когато Вашингтон наложи санкциите по „Магнитски“, лидерът на ГЕРБ заяви, че „той е силен, сериозен човек, в живота си е доказал и неслучайно ДПС си го върнаха“.
Всячески искат да сложат Пеевски при мен, а те [ПП–ДБ, б.а.] да се отърсят от това си минало. Не ми пука. Докато има стабилно мнозинство чрез него и в правителството, и в държавата, аз ще го правя.
Бойко Борисов, 6 ноември 2025 г.
По същия начин, по който величае Пеевски, допреди години Борисов ласкаеше Доган.
2008 г.:
Ахмед Доган е най-великият български политик.
2011 г.:
Доган е най-сериозният депутат.
2014 г.:
Г-н Доган е най-високият пост в държавата. Той действително разпределя всичко.[…] Когато за 24 години г-н Доган поне 5 пъти е управлявал държавата, не мога да не му призная резултата. Почетен председател, не подписва нищо, не ходи в парламента.
След 2020 г. лидерът на ГЕРБ вече пое нов курс.
Преди две години изхвърли Владислав Горанов от ГЕРБ, след като беше санкциониран по „Магнитски“, и дори се разграничи от него.
По-късно Горанов вече стана „най-добрият ни финансов експерт“, а се разбра и че Борисов активно съдейства той и Пеевски да бъдат освободени от тежестта на санкциите. Не само се оказа, че не е по силите му, но беше наказано и самохвалството му. След като лидерът на ГЕРБ публично заяви, че в лична среща с бившия външен министър Дейвид Камерън е преговарял за сваляне на санкциите, Посолството на Великобритания го „зашлеви“ с позиция:
Всички режими за санкции, въведени от Обединеното кралство, имат конкретни цели, определени в съответното законодателство. Целта на режима за глобални санкции срещу корупцията е да предотвратява и противодейства на сериозни случаи на корупция. Санкциите остават в сила.
Санкционираните по „Магнитски“ публично се опитваха да омаловажат санкциите, обяснявайки как те не действат в Европа и пр. В действителност обаче те са белязани и шампионът по управление Борисов с всеки изминал ден печели не стабилност, а ерозия от подкрепата им. Тези хора знаят как да защитават корупцията, не и демокрацията. Демокрацията стана фронтова линия и има милион и петстотин хиляди защитници. Не стигат.
1975 Banqiao Dam failure: The River Dragon has come.
Post Syndicated from The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered original https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miV7udgu_FY
Faking Receipts with AI
Post Syndicated from Bruce Schneier original https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2025/11/faking-receipts-with-ai.html
Over the past few decades, it’s become easier and easier to create fake receipts. Decades ago, it required special paper and printers—I remember a company in the UK advertising its services to people trying to cover up their affairs. Then, receipts became computerized, and faking them required some artistic skills to make the page look realistic.
Now, AI can do it all:
Several receipts shown to the FT by expense management platforms demonstrated the realistic nature of the images, which included wrinkles in paper, detailed itemization that matched real-life menus, and signatures.
[…]
The rise in these more realistic copies has led companies to turn to AI to help detect fake receipts, as most are too convincing to be found by human reviewers.
The software works by scanning receipts to check the metadata of the image to discover whether an AI platform created it. However, this can be easily removed by users taking a photo or a screenshot of the picture.
To combat this, it also considers other contextual information by examining details such as repetition in server names and times and broader information about the employee’s trip.
Yet another AI-powered security arms race.
Improving Customer Satisfaction and Experience with Zabbix
Post Syndicated from Michael Kammer original https://blog.zabbix.com/improving-customer-satisfaction-and-experience-with-zabbix/31692/

No matter what business you’re in, there is one universal truth – your success or failure depends on customer satisfaction and trust. And when your IT systems fail, it’s your customers who pay the price. Being unable to place an order due to unexpected downtime (which can cost a large organization as much as $9,000 per minute) or having their credit card data compromised in a preventable security breach (which costs the average organization nearly $5 million) will force even your most loyal customers to go somewhere else.
Monitoring with Zabbix doesn’t just keep your infrastructure safe, it keeps your reputation safe and makes sure that your customers continue to be your customers. It does this by guaranteeing the performance, reliability, and security of your digital services – while also supporting better customer service and continuous improvement. Keep reading to see how it’s possible.
Table of Contents
Say goodbye to downtime
Your customers are looking to meet their needs quickly and effectively. Unexpected service disruptions cause them to feel neglected and force them to look elsewhere for solutions.
Monitoring your infrastructure with Zabbix can effectively eliminate downtime through proactive issue detection, which locates anomalies and performance issues like high CPU usage, packet loss, and latency in real time – before they have a chance to make life harder for customers.
If an issue does occur, Zabbix’s predictive alerting capabilities let your tech teams know about anything that could potentially impact an application or service, which lets them meet SLAs and provide a better, more reliable customer experience with fewer service disruptions, which in turns leads to higher levels of trust and satisfaction.
Outperform your competitors
No matter how good your products or services happen to be, you still need to provide smooth and fast online user experience if you want repeat use and positive reviews. Monitoring with Zabbix optimizes network traffic by helping you to identify bandwidth bottlenecks or misconfigured devices with a single glance at a dashboard, allowing better traffic management and a better online experience for customers.
It also improves response times, which allows you to be confident that your applications and services remain responsive. This is especially important for real-time services like video conferencing, e-commerce, or customer support.
Turn good customer service into outstanding customer service
What turns a casual, one-time user into a repeat customer? In most cases, it all comes down to making that user feel seen, informed, and supported. Zabbix helps you maintain consistent system performance, and nothing builds trust like stability.
With a bit of configuration and the help of IT service management tools like ServiceNow, Zabbix can provide clear, easy-to-access logs and metrics that help your customer service reps better understand your customers and the process of serving them, including:
• Customer satisfaction (CSAT)
• Preferred communication channel
• Average ticket count
• Average response time
• Average ticket resolution time
• Ticket resolution rate
• Ticket backlog
• Interactions per ticket
With this information, your team will be able to communicate proactively when issues happen, giving customers accurate information about the issue and the expected resolution time.
Keep your customers safe from cyber threats
The consequences of a data breach are deep and far-reaching, and they include financial losses, reputational damage, legal troubles, regulatory fines, and a loss of customer trust. Despite a greater emphasis on data security, hackers are constantly finding new ways to gain access to valuable corporate data and credentials by combining next-generation AI technologies with long-established tools.
Monitoring with Zabbix gives IT and security teams the visibility and early warning systems they need to spot and react to potential threats. Zabbix continuously monitors systems, networks, and applications for predefined thresholds and anomalies, identifying possible network intrusions or misconfigurations and notifying the relevant security stakeholders.
On top of that, Zabbix can monitor any existing security tools your team runs, tracking antivirus software, firewalls, IDS/IPS tools, and endpoint protection solutions to make sure they are functioning properly and running the latest versions. It can also integrate with SIEM systems (like Splunk, ELK, or Wazuh) as well as custom scripts in order to provide extended security analytics.
Meet (and exceed) your SLAs
Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are a framework for managing the expectations of both customers and businesses. They define agreed-on standards of service, but tracking them is more than just a way to measure compliance – it’s a tool that you can use to improve your overall service delivery and operations.
With Zabbix, you can monitor any quantifiable metric that’s relevant to your SLAs, such as system uptime/downtime, response time, the availability of web services, databases, or network devices, transaction success and failure rates, and much more. In addition, Zabbix can use real-time data and built-in SLA calculation to automatically calculate current SLA compliance and send an alert if an SLA is at risk of being breached, by using triggers based on thresholds.
If you’d rather track the metrics on your own, no problem – by using Zabbix dashboards, you can visualize SLA compliance in real-time, with the dashboards showing availability percentages, event timelines, and breach summaries, while giving you easy-to-understand views of service health. The result is better products and services that are aligned with customer expectations.
Build a continuous improvement culture
When it’s time to roll out a new feature or upgrade, you naturally want to have ALL the necessary data at your fingertips. Monitoring usage patterns and performance metrics with Zabbix not only gives you advanced visualizations (forecasting, capacity planning insights, etc.) but can also highlight cases where data analysis led to tangible improvements.
Want more input from customers and users? Zabbix can make sure that the improvements to your product are community-driven by giving you the data you need to run regular user surveys and forums to gather product feedback. It can even help you publish a public roadmap with transparent prioritization based on community input.
Conclusion
Customer satisfaction is about a lot more than just good service – it’s also about consistency, reliability, and transparency. Zabbix empowers businesses to deliver all three by providing a comprehensive, proactive, and scalable monitoring solution.
That’s why customers in verticals as diverse as aerospace and education turn to Zabbix to keep them informed about what’s working – and what isn’t. By integrating Zabbix into your IT operations, you’re not just improving system performance – you’re actively investing in customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Find out more about what Zabbix can do for you and your customers by taking a look at real-world case studies from companies like yours.
The post Improving Customer Satisfaction and Experience with Zabbix appeared first on Zabbix Blog.
Т.Е. от Е.Т. – епизод 30
Post Syndicated from Тоест original https://www.toest.bg/t-e-ot-e-t-epizod-30/

Борисов, който не лъже, че не му пука. „Дидо“, който, разбира се, „се занимава, където има теми за хората“. Йордан Цонев, който ще чисти „цялата обществена среда в страната“, ама не каза себе си накъде ще почисти. Малко костенурки и змии във вземане-даване с АПИ и един бюджет от една Теменужка, дето не се знае какво ще става с него.
Следете видеорубриката на Елена Телбис за „Тоест“ и във Facebook, Instagram и TikTok.
Xsight Labs E1 800G 64-Core Arm DPU Shown for Hammerspace AI Storage
Post Syndicated from Patrick Kennedy original https://www.servethehome.com/xsight-labs-e1-800g-64-core-arm-dpu-shown-for-hammerspace-ai-storage/
The Xsight Labs E1 800G 64-core Arm DPU was shown in an ultra-dense Hammerspace AI storage solution at OCP Summit 2025
The post Xsight Labs E1 800G 64-Core Arm DPU Shown for Hammerspace AI Storage appeared first on ServeTheHome.
Comic for 2025.11.07
Post Syndicated from Explosm.net original https://explosm.net/comics/33332
New Cyanide and Happiness Comic
Earthquake Prediction Flowchart
Post Syndicated from xkcd.com original https://xkcd.com/3165/

Managing Diabetes in Software Freedom
Post Syndicated from Bradley M. Kuhn original http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2025/11/06/juggluco-foss-continuous-glucose-montior-diabetes.html
[ The below is a cross-post of an article that I published on my blog
at Software Freedom Conservancy. ]
Our member project representatives and others who collaborate with
SFC on projects
know that I’ve been on part-time medical leave this year. As I recently announced publicly on the Fediverse, I was diagnosed in March 2025 with early-stage Type
2 Diabetes. I had no idea that that the diagnosis would become a
software freedom and users’ rights endeavor.
After the diagnosis, my doctor suggested immediately that I see the diabetes nurse-practitioner
specialist in their practice. It took some time get an appointment with him,
so I saw him first in mid-April 2025.
I walked into the office, sat down, and within minutes the specialist
asked me to “take out your phone and install the Freestyle Libre app
from Abbott”. This is the first (but, will probably not be the only) time a medical practitioner
asked me to install proprietary software as the first step of
treatment.
The specialist told me that in his experience, even early-stage diabetics
like me should use a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM). CGM’s
are an amazing (relatively) recent invention that allows diabetics to
sample their blood sugar level constantly. As we software developers and
engineers know: great things happen when your diagnostic readout is as low
latency as possible. CGMs lower the latency of readouts from 3–4
times a day to every five minutes. For example, diabetics can see
what foods are most likely to cause blood sugar spikes for them
personally. CGMs put patients on a path to manage this chronic condition
well.
But, the devices themselves, and the (default) apps that control them are
hopelessly proprietary. Fortunately, this was (obviously) not my first time
explaining
FOSS from first
principles. So, I read through the license and terms and conditions of the
ironically named “Freestyle Libre” app, and pointed out to the
specialist how patient-unfriendly the terms were. For example, Abbott (the
manufacturer of my CGM) reserves the right to collect your data
(anonymously of course, to “improve the product”). They also
require patients to agree that if they take any action to reverse engineer,
modify, or otherwise do the normal things our community does with
software, the patient must agree that such actions “constitute
immediate, irreparable harm to Abbott, its affiliates, and/or its
licensors”. I briefly explained to the specialist that I could not
possibly agree. I began in real-time (still sitting with the specialist) a
search for a FOSS solution.
As I was searching, the specialist said: “Oh, I don’t use any of it
myself, but I think I’ve heard of this ‘open source’ thing
— there is a program called xDrip+ that is for insulin-dependent
diabetics that I’ve heard of and some patients report it is quite
good”.
While I’m (luckily) very far from insulin-dependency, I eventually found
the FOSS Android app called
Juggluco (a
portmanteau for “Juggle glucose”). I asked the specialist to
give me the prescription and I’d try Juggluco to see if it would work.
CGM‘s are very small
and their firmware is (by obvious necessity) quite simple. As such, their
interfaces are standard. CGM’s are activated with Near Field Communication
(NFC) — available on even quite old Android devices.
The Android device sends a simple integer identifier via NFC that activates
the CGM. Once activated — and through the 15-day life of the device
— the device responds via Bluetooth with the patient’s current
glucose reading to any device presenting that integer.
Fortunately, I quickly discovered that the FOSS community was already
“on this”. The NFC activation worked just fine, even on the
recently updated “Freestyle Libre 3+”. After
the sixty minute calibration period, I had a continuous readout in Juggluco.
CGM‘s lower latency
feedback enables diabetics to have more control of their illness
management. one example among many: the patient can see (in real time)
what foods most often cause blood sugar spikes for
them personally. Diabetes hits everyone differently; data allows
everyone to manage their own chronic condition better.
My personal story with Juggluco will continue — as I hope (although
not until after FOSDEM 2026 😆) to become an upstream contributor to
Juggluco. Most importantly, I hope to help the app appear in F-Droid. (I
must currently side-load or use Aurora Store to make it work on
LineageOS.)
Fitting with the history that many projects that interact with proprietary
technology must so often live through, Juggluco has
faced surreptitious
removal from Google’s Play Store. Abbott even accused Juggluco of
using their proprietary libraries and encryption methods, but the so-called
“encryption method” is literally sending an single integer as
part of NFC activation.
While Abbott backed off, this is another example of why the movement of
patients taking control of the technology remains
essential. FOSS
fits perfectly with this goal. Software freedom gives control of
technology to those who actually rely on it — rather than for-profit
medical equipment manufacturers.
When I returned to my specialist for a follow-up, we reviewed the data and
graphs that I produced with Juggluco. I, of course, have never installed,
used, or even agreed to Abbott’s licenses and terms, so I have never seen
what the Abbott app does. I was thus surprised when I showed my specialist
Juggluco’s summary graphs. He excitedly told me “this is much better
reporting than the Abbott app gives you!”. We all know that
sometimes proprietary software has better and more features than the FOSS
equivalent, so it’s a particularly great success when our community efforts
outdoes a wealthy 200 billion-dollar megacorp on software features!
Please do watch SFC’s site in 2026 for more posts about my ongoing work
with Juggluco, and
please give generously as an
SFC Sustainer to help this and our other work continue in 2026!