Tag Archives: Compliance

Winter 2024 SOC 1 report is now available with 183 services in scope

Post Syndicated from Paul Hong original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/winter-2024-soc-1-report-is-now-available-with-183-services-in-scope/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is pleased to announce that the Winter 2024 System and Organization Controls (SOC) 1 report is now available. The report covers 183 services over the 12-month period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, giving customers a full year of assurance. This report demonstrates our continuous commitment to adhere to the heightened expectations for cloud service providers.

Customers can download the Winter 2024 SOC 1 report through AWS Artifact, a self-service portal for on-demand access to AWS compliance reports. Sign in to AWS Artifact in the AWS Management Console, or learn more at Getting Started with AWS Artifact.

AWS strives to continuously bring services into the scope of its compliance programs to help customers meet their architectural and regulatory needs. Customers can reach out to their AWS account team if they have any questions or feedback about SOC compliance.

To learn more about AWS compliance and security programs, see AWS Compliance Programs. As always, we value feedback and questions; reach out to the AWS Compliance team through the Contact Us page.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
 

Paul Hong

Paul Hong
Paul is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security, compliance, and training initiatives within AWS and has over 12 years of experience in security assurance. Paul holds CISSP, CEH, and CPA certifications. He has a master’s degree in accounting information systems and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from James Madison University, Virginia.

Tushar Jain

Tushar Jain
Tushar is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security and privacy initiatives within AWS. Tushar holds a Master of Business Administration from Indian Institute of Management Shillong, India and a Bachelor of Technology in electronics and telecommunication engineering from Marathwada University, India. He has over 12 years of experience in information security and holds CCSK and CSXF certifications.

Michael Murphy

Michael Murphy
Michael is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security and privacy initiatives within AWS. Michael has 12 years of experience in information security. He holds a master’s degree and a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology. He also holds CISSP, CRISC, CISA, and CISM certifications.

Nathan Samuel

Nathan Samuel
Nathan is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security and privacy initiatives within AWS. Nathan has a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, and has over 21 years of experience in security assurance. He holds the CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, CISM, CDPSE, and Certified Internal Auditor certifications.

ryan wilks

Ryan Wilks
Ryan is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security and privacy initiatives within AWS. Ryan has 13 years of experience in information security. He has a Bachelor of Arts degree from Rutgers University and holds ITIL, CISM, and CISA certifications.

Gabby Iem
Gabby Iem

Gabby is a Program Manager at AWS. She supports multiple initiatives within AWS security assurance and has recently received her bachelor’s degree from Chapman University studying business administration.

Cloudflare is now IRAP assessed at the PROTECTED level, furthering our commitment to the global public sector

Post Syndicated from Wesley Evans original https://blog.cloudflare.com/irap-protected-assessment/

We are excited to announce our public sector suite of services for Australia, Cloudflare for Government – Australia, has been assessed under the Infosec Registered Assessor Program (IRAP) at the PROTECTED level in Australia.

IRAP, established by the Australian government, provides a rigorous, standardized approach to security assessment for cloud products and services. Achieving IRAP PROTECTED assessment reinforces our commitment to providing secure, high-performance solutions for government agencies and highly regulated industries across the globe.  

Obtaining our IRAP assessment is one part of our broader strategy to scale out our Cloudflare for Government offering to as many areas of the world as possible. Cloudflare’s global network offers governments and highly regulated customers a unique capability to be within 50ms of 95% of Internet users globally, while also offering robust security for data processing, key management, and metadata storage. Earlier this year, we announced that we completed our ENS certification in Spain, and we are well underway on the development of our FedRAMP High systems in the United States. 

Cloudflare’s network spans more than 330 cities in over 120 countries, where we interconnect with approximately 13,000 network providers in order to provide a broad range of services to millions of customers. Our network is our greatest strength to provide resiliency, security, and performance. So, instead of creating a siloed government network that has limited access to our products and services, we decided to build the unique government compliance capabilities directly into our platform from the very beginning. We accomplished this by delivering critical controls in three key areas: traffic processing, management, and metadata storage.

The benefit of running the same software across our entire network is that it enables us to leverage our global footprint, and then make smart choices about how to handle traffic. For instance, Regional Services (our system that ensures that traffic is processed in the correct region) runs globally. Regional Services allows us to do global Layer 3 (network layer) DDoS attack prevention, while still only decrypting traffic inside our IRAP boundary, which includes both US and Australian facilities. This software-defined regionalization approach allows us to get the full benefits of the global network running anycast, while offering highly specific regionalization on the same hardware. We get similar advantages for key management and metadata storage locality. 

Network and security services can dramatically improve user experiences, but only when they run as close to the user as possible, even if the user doesn’t live close to a major hub. Leveraging our global network of over 300 data centers to ingest traffic to our network, our private backbone can move traffic to the closest certified processing location that is within the scope of our IRAP system. This enables you to meet the most stringent controls of the IRAP assessment without trading off user experience.

Our single platform strategy enables almost every Cloudflare product and service across all of our solution areas to be included in scope with Cloudflare for Government – Australia. This includes our application security products like our CDN, WAF, API Shield, Rate Limiting, and Bot Management. Our Zero Trust Products like Secure Web Gateway, CASB, Magic Transit, Magic WAN, and Remote Browser Isolation are also in scope, as are developer platform components including Workers, R2, Durable Objects, Stream, and Cache Reserve. 

We invite all of our Cloudflare for Government public and private partners to learn more about our capabilities and work with us to develop solutions to meet the security demands required in complex environments. Please reach out to us at [email protected] with any questions.

2024 H2 IRAP report is now available on AWS Artifact for Australian customers

Post Syndicated from Patrick Chang original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/2024-h2-irap-report-is-now-available-on-aws-artifact-for-australian-customers/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is excited to announce that a new Information Security Registered Assessors Program (IRAP) report (2024 H2) is now available through AWS Artifact. An independent Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) certified IRAP assessor completed the IRAP assessment of AWS in February 2025.

The new IRAP report includes an additional six AWS services that are now assessed at the PROTECTED level under IRAP. This brings the total number of services assessed at the PROTECTED level to 164.

The following are the six newly assessed services:

For the full list of services, see the IRAP tab on the AWS Services in Scope by Compliance Program page.

AWS has developed an IRAP documentation pack to help Australian customers and their partners plan, architect, and assess risk for their workloads when they use AWS Cloud services.

We developed this pack in accordance with the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) Cloud Security Guidance and Cloud Assessment and Authorisation framework, which addresses guidance within the Australian Government’s Information Security Manual (ISM, September 2024 version), the Department of Home Affairs’ Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF), and the Digital Transformation Agency’s Secure Cloud Strategy.

The IRAP pack on AWS Artifact also includes newly updated versions of the AWS Consumer Guide and the whitepaper Reference Architectures for ISM PROTECTED Workloads in the AWS Cloud.

Reach out to your AWS representatives to let us know which additional services you would like to see in scope for upcoming IRAP assessments. We strive to bring more services into scope at the PROTECTED level under IRAP to support your requirements.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Patrick Chang
Patrick Chang

Patrick is the APJ Audit Lead based in Sydney. He leads security audits, certifications, and compliance programs across the APJ region. He is a technology risk and audit professional with over a decade of experience. He is passionate about delivering assurance programs that build trust with customers and provide them assurance on cloud security.

AWS completes the annual UAE Information Assurance Regulation compliance assessment

Post Syndicated from Vishal Pabari original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/aws-completes-the-annual-uae-information-assurance-regulation-compliance-assessment-2/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is pleased to announce the publication of our annual compliance assessment report on the Information Assurance Regulation (IAR) established by the Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The report covers the AWS Middle East (UAE) Region.

The IAR provides management and technical information security controls to help establish, implement, maintain, and continuously improve information assurance. AWS alignment with IAR requirements demonstrates our ongoing commitment to adhere to the heightened expectations for cloud service providers. As such, IAR-regulated customers can continue to use AWS services with confidence.

Independent third-party auditors from BDO evaluated AWS for the period of November 1, 2023, to October 31, 2024. The assessment report that illustrates the status of AWS compliance is available through AWS Artifact. AWS Artifact is a self-service portal for on-demand access to AWS compliance reports. Sign in to AWS Artifact in the AWS Management Console, or learn more at Getting Started with AWS Artifact.

AWS strives to continuously bring services into the scope of its compliance programs to help you meet your architectural and regulatory needs. If you have questions or feedback about IAR compliance, reach out to your AWS account team.

To learn more about our compliance and security programs, see AWS Compliance Programs. As always, we value your feedback and questions; reach out to the AWS Compliance team through the Contact Us page.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.

Vishal Pabari
Vishal Pabari

Vishal is a Security Assurance Program Manager at AWS, based in London, UK. Vishal is responsible for third-party and customer audits, attestations, certifications, and assessments across EMEA. Vishal previously worked in risk and control, and technology in the financial services industry.

AWS completes the annual Dubai Electronic Security Centre certification audit to operate as a Tier 1 cloud service provider in the Emirate of Dubai

Post Syndicated from Vishal Pabari original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/aws-completes-the-annual-dubai-electronic-security-centre-certification-audit-to-operate-as-a-tier-1-cloud-service-provider-in-the-emirate-of-dubai-2/

We’re excited to announce that Amazon Web Services (AWS) has completed the annual Dubai Electronic Security Centre (DESC) certification audit to operate as a Tier 1 Cloud Service Provider (CSP) for the AWS Middle East (UAE) Region.

This alignment with DESC requirements demonstrates our continued commitment to adhere to the heightened expectations for CSPs. Government customers of AWS can run their applications in AWS Cloud-certified Regions with confidence.

The independent third-party auditor (BSI) issued the Certificate of Compliance to AWS on behalf of DESC on January 23, 2025. The Certificate of Compliance that illustrates the compliance status of AWS is available through AWS Artifact. AWS Artifact is a self-service portal for on-demand access to AWS compliance reports. Sign in to AWS Artifact in the AWS Management Console, or learn more at Getting Started with AWS Artifact.

The certification includes 11 additional services in scope, for a total of 98 services. This is a 13% year-on-year increase in the number of services in the Middle East (UAE) Region that are in scope of the DESC CSP certification. For up-to-date information, including when additional services are added, see the AWS Services in Scope by Compliance Program webpage and choose DESC CSP.

AWS strives to continuously bring services into the scope of its compliance programs to help you adhere to your architectural and regulatory needs. If you have questions or feedback about DESC compliance, reach out to your AWS account team.

To learn more about our compliance and security programs, see AWS Compliance Programs. As always, we value your feedback and questions; reach out to the AWS Compliance team through the Contact Us page.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
 

Vishal Pabari
Vishal Pabari

Vishal is a Security Assurance Program Manager at AWS, based in London, UK. Vishal is responsible for third-party and customer audits, attestations, certifications, and assessments across EMEA. Vishal previously worked in risk and control, and technology in the financial services industry.

2025 ISO and CSA STAR certificates now available with four additional services

Post Syndicated from Nimesh Ravasa original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/2025-iso-and-csa-star-certificates-now-available-with-four-additional-services/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) successfully completed an onboarding audit with no findings for ISO 9001:2015, 27001:2022, 27017:2015, 27018:2019, 27701:2019, 20000-1:2018, and 22301:2019, and Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) STAR Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0. EY CertifyPoint auditors conducted the audit and reissued the certificates on February 19, 2025. The objective was to assess the level of compliance with the requirements of the applicable international standards.

We’ve added four additional AWS services to the audit scope since the last certification issued on November 29, 2024. These are the four additional services:

For a full list of AWS services that are certified under ISO and CSA STAR, see the AWS ISO and CSA STAR Certified page. You can also access the certifications in the AWS Management Console through AWS Artifact.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
 

Nimesh Ravasa
Nimesh Ravasa

Nimesh is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security and privacy initiatives within AWS. Nimesh has 15 years of experience in information security and holds CISSP, CDPSE, CISA, PMP, CSX, AWS Solutions Architect – Associate, and AWS Security Specialty certifications.
Chinmaee Parulekar
Chinmaee Parulekar

Chinmaee is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. She has 5 years of experience in information security. Chinmaee holds a Master of Science degree in Management Information Systems and professional certifications such as CISA.

Support Canada’s CCCS PBHVA overlay compliance with the Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS

Post Syndicated from Naranjan Goklani original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/support-canadas-cccs-pbhva-overlay-compliance-with-the-landing-zone-accelerator-on-aws/

Organizations seeking to adhere to the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS) Protected B High Value Assets (PBHVA) overlay requirements can use the Landing Zone Accelerator (LZA) on AWS solution with the CCCS Medium configuration to accelerate their compliance journey. To further support customers, AWS recently collaborated with Coalfire to assess and verify the LZA solution’s ability to support CCCS PBHVA overlay controls.

By implementing the PBHVA control overlay over a CCCS Medium baseline, you can better protect your organization’s most critical assets from potential threats and vulnerabilities, providing continuity of essential government operations and safeguarding sensitive information.

Understanding CCCS PBHVA overlay requirements

The CCCS PBHVA overlay consists of 137 controls designed to protect high-value assets, including 69 new controls and 68 controls from CCCS Medium. These controls provide enhanced data protection, particularly for integrity and availability, and are based on NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.

Key findings from the Coalfire assessment

Coalfire’s assessment found that the LZA on AWS solution significantly supports CCCS PBHVA overlay compliance requirements:

  • 71 percent of in-scope controls (97 of 137) are supported by the AWS contribution to compliance in the shared responsibility model
  • The solution uses over 35 AWS services to provide comprehensive security capabilities
  • Strong network segmentation is achieved through network account and network-boundary VPC design
  • Infrastructure-as-code (IaC) enables reliable build and deployment results

The 29 percent of controls not addressed by the LZA are on the customer side of the shared responsibility model. They are addressed in the customer’s application stack or as non-technical controls such as policies and procedures.

Key security capabilities

The LZA solution implements several critical security features:

Implementation considerations

While the LZA solution provides significant compliance support, organizations should note:

  • The solution alone does not guarantee compliance
  • Organizations must implement their own policies, standards, and procedures
  • A thorough understanding of the shared responsibility model is essential

The AWS Landing Zone Accelerator Verified Reference Architecture documentation is available for customer download in AWS Artifact. This resource can help organizations reduce the time and effort required to deploy an environment that aligns with CCCS PBHVA overlay requirements.

Conclusion

The Coalfire assessment confirms that the LZA on AWS solution provides effective support for CCCS PBHVA overlay compliance objectives. However, organizations should remember that compliance is an ongoing process that requires active management and cannot be achieved through technology alone.

For more information about implementing the Landing Zone Accelerator for CCCS PBHVA overlay requirements, contact your AWS account team or the AWS Public Sector team directly.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Naranjan Goklani
Naranjan Goklani

Naranjan is an Audit Lead for Canada based in Toronto. He has experience leading audits, attestations, certifications, and assessments across North America and Europe. Naranjan has more than 15 years of experience in risk management, security assurance, and performing technology audits. Naranjan previously worked in one of the Big 4 accounting firms and supported clients from the financial services, technology, retail, e-commerce, and utilities industries as part of the first and third line of defense.
Michael Davie
Michael Davie

Michael is the Canada lead for Amazon Web Services (AWS) Compliance and Security Assurance. He works with customers, regulators, and AWS teams to help raise the bar on secure cloud adoption and usage. Michael has more than 20 years of experience working in the defence, intelligence, and technology sectors in Canada, and is a licensed professional engineer.
James Kierstead
James Kierstead

James is a senior solutions architect at Amazon Web Services (AWS) based in Ottawa, Canada. He is passionate about helping Canada’s federal government use AWS to deliver services to Canadians.

2024 FINMA ISAE 3000 Type II attestation report available with 179 services in scope

Post Syndicated from Tariro Dongo original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/2024-finma-isae-3000-type-ii-attestation-report-available-with-179-services-in-scope/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is pleased to announce the issuance of the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) Type II attestation report with 179 services in scope.

The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has published several requirements and guidelines about engaging with outsourced services for the regulated financial services customers in Switzerland.

An independent third-party audit firm issued the report to assure customers that the AWS control environment is appropriately designed and operating effectively to support adherence with FINMA requirements.

The latest report covers the 12-month period from October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024, for the following circulars:

  • 2018/03 “Outsourcing – banks, insurance companies and selected financial institutions under FinIA”
  • 2023/01 “Operational risks and resilience – banks”
  • Business Continuity Management (BCM) minimum standards proposed by the Swiss Insurance Association

AWS has added the following 10 services to the current FINMA scope:

Customers can find the FINMA ISAE 3000 report on AWS Artifact. To learn more about the complete list of services in scope, see AWS Compliance Programs and AWS Services in Scope for FINMA.

AWS strives to continuously bring new services into the scope of its compliance programs to help you meet your architectural and regulatory needs. Contact your AWS account team for questions about the FINMA report.

To learn more about our compliance and security programs, see AWS Compliance Programs. As always, we value your feedback and questions; reach out to the AWS Compliance team through the Contact Us page.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.

Tariro Dongo
Tariro Dongo

Tari is a Security Assurance Program Manager at AWS, based in London. Tari is responsible for third-party and customer audits, attestations, certifications, and assessments across EMEA. Previously, Tari worked for over 12 years in security assurance and technology risk in the big four and financial services industry.

Cloudflare’s commitment to advancing Public Sector security worldwide by pursuing FedRAMP High, IRAP, and ENS

Post Syndicated from Wesley Evans original https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflares-commitment-to-advancing-public-sector-security-worldwide/

Today, we announced our commitment to achieving the US Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) – High, Australian Infosec Registered Assessors Program (IRAP), and Spain’s Esquema Nacional de Seguridad (ENS) as part of Cloudflare for Government. As more and more essential services are being shifted to the Internet, ensuring that governments and regulated industries have industry standard tools is critical for ensuring their uptime, reliability and performance.

What sets Cloudflare for Government apart?

Cloudflare’s network spans more than 330 cities in over 120 countries, where we interconnect with approximately 13,000 network providers in order to provide a broad range of services to millions of customers. Our network is our greatest strength to provide resiliency, security, and performance. So instead of creating a siloed government network that has limited access to our products and services, we decided to build the unique government compliance capabilities directly into our platform from the very beginning. We accomplished this by delivering critical controls in three key areas: traffic processing, management, and metadata storage.

The benefit of running the same software across our entire network is that it enables us to leverage our global footprint, and then make smart choices about how to handle traffic. For instance, Regional Services (our system that ensures that traffic is processed in the correct region) runs globally. We can offer anycast for all customer traffic, even FedRAMP Moderate traffic. Regional Services allows us to do global Layer 3 (network layer) DDoS attack prevention, while still only decrypting traffic inside our FedRAMP, IRAP, or ENS boundary. We get similar advantages for key management and metadata storage locality. 

Network and security services can dramatically improve user experiences, but only when they run as close to the user as possible, even if the user doesn’t live close to a major hub. Leveraging our global network of over 300 data centers to ingest traffic to our network, our private backbone can move traffic to the closest certified processing location. This enables you to meet the most stringent compliance requirements without trading off user experience.

Cloudflare’s strong commitment is to deliver a first class experience for all regulated and public sector customers, regardless of the complexity of their requirements, on one single platform with all of our products. Doing the hard work upfront of building on a single network without taking shortcuts has allowed us to provide our FedRAMP Moderate, and soon our FedRAMP High, ENS, and IRAP offering to everyone without segmentation of the platform.

Our single platform strategy enables almost every Cloudflare product and service across all of our solution areas to be included in scope with Cloudflare for Government. 

How has the Cloudflare for Government service offering evolved over the past two years?

Since our FedRAMP Moderate authorization in 2022, Cloudflare has continuously expanded and improved our program. This has included the expansion of our FedRAMP scope to include even more products to secure the US public sector:

  • API Shield provides API Security and abuse detection features with a strong focus on data-driven approaches.

  • R2 provides object storage for large amounts of unstructured data without costly egress bandwidth fees.

  • Cache Reserve is a large, persistent data store implemented on top of R2. 

  • Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) connects, scans, and monitors SaaS applications for security issues. It is part of Cloudflare’s Zero Trust platform, which uses API-driven and easy-to-use tools to protect data and users across SaaS apps. Cloudflare CASB can detect and prevent data leaks, compliance violations, shadow IT, misconfigurations, and risky data sharing.

We’re also looking forward to introducing two new Cloudflare Products into our FedRAMP Moderate scope in 2025:

  • Hyperdrive accelerates queries made to existing databases, making it faster to access data from across the globe, irrespective of user location.

  • Cloudflare Images is a robust, cloud-native image pipeline that ingests, stores, optimizes, and delivers images across our global network.

As we pursue FedRAMP High, ENS, and IRAP, we are committed to certifying, and authorizing the entire range of Cloudflare products on our platform, not just point source solutions. Over the next several years, we will focus on making sure that all GA products at Cloudflare are able to run in the most regulatory complex environments. We are excited about bringing products like Email Security, Cloudflare Calls, and Access for Infrastructure into Cloudflare for Government.

As discussed above, Cloudflare’s scale is one of many things that sets us apart from other cloud service providers. Currently operating in over 30 data centers across 10 cities in the United States, Cloudflare is expanding the Cloudflare for Government boundary to include eight international data centers and four new US data centers in 2025. Not only will this expansion enable Cloudflare to more quickly serve public sector customers outside the US, but it also reinforces our commitment to help protect and connect customers globally as the world’s first connectivity cloud.


Cloudflare is ready for the future of the public sector

Promoting innovation and industry-recognized technologies 

Cloudflare continues to be a leader in the post-quantum cryptography (PQC) space, and we believe that post-quantum security should be the new baseline for the Internet. We could not have achieved meaningful progress with the global rollout of ML-KEM without our deep collaboration with NIST in the US. Our public-private collaboration has been immensely valuable. It has been key in getting these cryptographic algorithms adopted at Cloudflare, and with our standards partners, to help everyone defend against future attacks from quantum computers. Over the last two years, this collaboration has led to over one-third of Cloudflare’s eyeball traffic being secured with PQC.  

Our work in PQC demonstrates one of the many ways in which we remain committed to research and innovation at Cloudflare, aligning well to the goals articulated by NIST and our other government partners. Our collaboration enabled us to bring PQC to FIPS in early 2023. Empowering service providers like Cloudflare to innovate and use industry-recognized technologies strengthens both private and public sector systems. 

Australian and Spanish security certifications  

Over the last decade we have demonstrated our commitment to obtaining both international (such as PCI, SOC2, and ISO 27001) and country-specific security certifications /  authorizations. Today, Cloudflare is proud to announce that we have completed authorizations for Spain (ENS). We are currently undergoing an assessment with Australia (IRAP)

What’s next for Cloudflare’s public sector compliance?

Two years of FedRAMP Moderate is just the beginning for our Cloudflare for Government journey. As we look into the new year, we can’t help but be excited about all that’s to come as we grow our public sector compliance program with FedRAMP High, IRAP, and ENS.

We invite all of our Cloudflare for Government public and private partners to learn more about our capabilities and work with us to develop solutions to meet the security demands required in complex environments. Please reach out to us at [email protected] with any questions.

For more information on Cloudflare’s FedRAMP status, please visit the FedRAMP Marketplace.

Cloudflare meets new Global Cross-Border Privacy standards

Post Syndicated from Rory Malone original https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-cbpr-a-global-privacy-first/

Cloudflare proudly leads the way with our approach to data privacy and the protection of personal information, and we’ve been an ardent supporter of the need for the free flow of data across jurisdictional borders. So today, on Data Privacy Day (also known internationally as Data Protection Day), we’re happy to announce that we’re adding our fourth and fifth privacy validations, and this time, they are global firsts! Cloudflare is the first organisation to announce that we have been successfully audited against the brand new Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules (Global CBPRs) for data controllers and the Global Privacy Recognition for Processors (Global PRP). These validations demonstrate our support and adherence to global standards that provide for privacy-respecting data flows across jurisdictions. Organizations that have been successfully audited will be formally certified when the certifications officially launch, which we expect to happen later in 2025. 

Our participation in the Global CBPRs and Global PRP joins our roster of privacy validations: we were one of the first cybersecurity organizations to certify to the international privacy standard ISO 27701:2019 when it was published, and in 2022 we also certified to the cloud privacy certification, ISO 27018:2019. In 2023, we added our third privacy validation, undergoing a review by an independent monitoring body in the European Union (EU) and declared to be adherent to the first official GDPR code of conduct — the EU Cloud Code of Conduct.

Why this matters to Cloudflare customers

Taking these privacy certifications together, Cloudflare demonstrates that we are meeting key official privacy validations in 39 jurisdictions around the world, from Australia and Austria to Sweden and the United States. An additional four jurisdictions (United Kingdom, Bermuda, Mauritius, and the Dubai International Finance Centre) are also in the process of joining and recognising the Global CBPR certifications. That’s important for Cloudflare customers as it provides reassurance that the privacy practices we have built are recognised by governments around the world.


What is the Global CBPR System?

In the last three years, governments across the world have been busy preparing two brand-new international privacy standards. A major milestone was achieved on April 30, 2024 when the Global CBPR System was established. The CBPRs are a voluntary, enforceable, international, accountability-based system that facilitates privacy-respecting data flows among members’ economies. They provide a baseline level of privacy protection for consumers through a set of rules on how to handle people’s personal information. This facilitates the free flow of data by upholding consumer privacy across participating members, despite each jurisdiction having their own individual data protection laws.

The CBPR System was developed by the Global CBPR Forum, an intergovernmental forum between the governments of Australia, Canada, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Philippines, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and the United States. The United Kingdom is also an associate member of the CBPR Forum, as are Bermuda, Mauritius, and the Dubai IFC, signifying their intent to join as full members in the future.

Over the last year, we have been busy preparing for the launch of the Global CBPR System. On May 1, 2024 — the very first day after the establishment of the system — Cloudflare applied to join. And we have now achieved the major milestone of successfully completing audits against the requirements, meaning we expect to be the first organization in the world to be newly certified to the Global CBPR system, as well as the related Global Privacy Recognition for Processors, when companies can officially be certified, which is expected later in 2025.


What the Global CBPR System covers

The Global CBPR System contains a detailed list of fifty requirements that organizations must meet in order to be certified under the scheme. The requirements derive from the nine Global CBPR Privacy Principles, which are consistent with the core principles of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Trans-Border Flows of Personal Data. The fifty requirements cover how organizations should collect, manage, and safeguard personal information in their custody. Organizations must meet every one of the fifty requirements in order to be Global CBPR certified. The nine principles underlying the requirements are:

Preventing Harm

Notice

Collection Limitation

Uses of Personal Information

Choice

Integrity of Personal Information

Security Safeguards

Access and Correction

Accountability

The nine Global CBPR Privacy Principles

The Global CBPR certification covers the handling of personal information controlled by the organization, such as the personal details of customers, employees, and job applicants. For Cloudflare, this also includes network information — our observations about how our global cloud platform handles server, network, or traffic data generated by Cloudflare in the course of providing our services.

The related Global Privacy Recognition for Processors (PRP) certification covers the handling of personal information processed by the organization on behalf of a different organization, usually their customer. The eighteen requirements of the PRP relate to the two privacy principles most relevant when processing this information on behalf of another organization: Security Safeguards and Accountability. For Cloudflare, this covers the processing of data pursuant to the Data Processing Addendum we sign with all of our customers, chiefly, the Customer Content flowing across our network and the Customer Logs generated by those data flows. Organizations must meet every one of the eighteen requirements in order to be Global PRP certified.

A deeper dive into some of the requirements of the Global CBPRs

As noted, the key requirements of the Global CBPRs and the Global PRP cover the well-known data protection principles of notice, choice, collection limitation (data minimization), the right of data subject access and correction, providing adequate security, preventing harm, integrity of personal information, accountability, and uses of personal information. There are dozens of requirements that cover these principles, so we’ll just touch on a few of them here.

Let’s first look at the principle of notice. One of the more obvious requirements from the CBPRs is question 1:

Do you provide clear and easily accessible statements about your practices and policies that govern the personal information described above (a privacy statement)?

Being transparent about the collection and use of personal information is a key principle of privacy and data protection, and transparency is one of Cloudflare’s core commitments. Documenting our practices and policies in regard to how we use personal information allows individuals to decide if they want to provide their information, and that’s why it’s best practice for the privacy notice to be available and visible at the time the information is being collected. Indeed, this concept of providing notice is clear from Article 13 of the EU’s GDPR. Cloudflare meets this CBPR requirement by providing a clear and accessible privacy notice visible from the footer of each page on our website. We also provide a link to the notice when we collect personal data such as through a form on a webpage.

In terms of how we use personal information, question 8 asks:

Do you limit the use of the personal information you collect (whether directly or through the use of third parties acting on your behalf) as identified in your privacy statement?

It has long been a commitment of Cloudflare’s that we only use the personal information we collect for the purposes of providing the services we offer. Our business is built on providing customers with the tools to protect their network applications and to make them faster, more secure, more reliable, and more private. In our Privacy Policy, we commit that we will “only share or otherwise disclose your personal information as necessary to provide our Services or as otherwise described in this Policy, except in cases where we first provide you with notice and the opportunity to consent.” And we maintain internal documentation (in keeping with the CBPR’s accountability principle) to document the data we are processing and the purposes for which we process it.

Another key set of requirements in both the Global CBPRs and the Global PRP have to do with security safeguards. CBPR requirement question 27 asks:

Describe the physical, technical and administrative safeguards you have implemented to protect personal information against risks such as loss or unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure of information or other misuses?

The similar requirement in the Global PRP is question 2: 

Describe the physical, technical and administrative safeguards that implement your organization’s information security policy.

Cloudflare has implemented an information security program in accordance with the ISO/IEC 27000 family of standards. Details of Cloudflare’s security program are documented in Annex 2 (“Technical and Organizational Security Measures”) of Cloudflare’s Customer Data Processing Addendum, including the physical, technical and administrative safeguards implemented to protect personal information.

Related to the Accountability principle, question 46 asks:

Do you have mechanisms in place with personal information processors, agents, contractors, or other service providers pertaining to personal information they process on your behalf, to ensure that your obligations to the individual will be met? 

When we have vendors who handle any of our, or our customers’, personal information, we require them to sign a Data Processing Addendum with us. This ensures the commitments we make to our customers in our customer agreements in turn flow through to our vendors, including the security requirements — holding them, and us, accountable.

More information

We are excited about the launch of the Global CBPR certifications, expected later in 2025, and we are proud that on this Data Privacy Day, we can yet again demonstrate our commitment to universally held principles for protecting the privacy of personal data.

You can find more about the Global CBPR System, the Global PRP, download a full copy of the requirements, and keep up to date with related news at globalcbpr.org.

For the latest information about our certifications, please visit our Trust Hub. Customers can also find out how to download a copy of Cloudflare’s certifications and reports from the Cloudflare dashboard.


CCN releases guide for Spain’s ENS landing zones using Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS

Post Syndicated from Tomás Clemente Sánchez original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/ccn-releases-guide-for-spains-ens-landing-zones-using-landing-zone-accelerator-on-aws/

Spanish version »

The Spanish National Cryptologic Center (CCN) has published a new STIC guide (CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A) that provides a comprehensive template and supporting artifacts for implementing landing zones that comply with Spain’s National Security Framework (ENS) Royal Decree 311/2022 using the Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS. Spain’s ENS establishes a common framework of basic principles and requirements of security for Spanish public sector organizations and their service providers, including supply chain providers. Over the years, the collaboration between Amazon Web Services (AWS) and the CCN has resulted in the publication of eight secure configuration guides (Series STIC 887) that provide comprehensive advice on the configuration of AWS services to align with the ENS. The guide CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A is the last addition to this series.

The centerpiece of this new guide is the ENS template for the Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS (LZA ENS). A landing zone serves as the initial setup of an organization’s cloud account or environment, including the implementation of security controls, access management, and compliance frameworks. The Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS is a powerful open source tool created by AWS for organizations that want to quickly customize and automate implementation of landing zones that align with AWS best practices and with regulatory compliance frameworks. This tool provides a comprehensive solution that, managed entirely by code, automatically configures over 35 AWS services using a simplified set of configuration files to manage and govern a multi-account environment, helping customers with highly regulated workloads and complex compliance requirements.

The CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A guide focuses on helping organizations implement landing zones that meet ENS security requirements from the ground up. It offers detailed instructions and templates for establishing a landing zone—the foundational infrastructure required for a secure, well-managed cloud environment—and a control matrix to demonstrate compliance with ENS controls.

Key components covered in the STIC 887H guide include:

  • Logging and monitoring: LZA ENS performs a default and scaled activation of the necessary logging and monitoring services required to meet ENS monitoring requirements in AWS services (such as AWS CloudTrail, Amazon CloudWatch, AWS Security Hub, and Amazon GuardDuty).
  • Access control: LZA ENS implements the management of identity and access management methods and policies at scale, which are aligned with the access control requirements of the ENS in a centralized manner using AWS IAM Identity Center.
  • Asset management: By default, LZA ENS activates inventory functions and resource and inventory tagging policies (for example, AWS Config) that support ENS asset management controls in the services.
  • Network topology: LZA ENS can be used to deploy a centralized network topology in accordance with ENS network security controls.
  • Cryptography: The encryption service activation capabilities built into LZA ENS can help organizations align with ENS data protection standards through mandatory encryption at rest, enforcement mechanisms with AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS), and monitoring mechanisms to detect unencrypted data and communications with AWS Config rules.
  • Compliance and data residency: LZA ENS includes control policies to promote the use of AWS services with the ENS High certification and to provide processing on AWS in accordance with customers’ data residency requirements.

Organizations that require specific customizations to fully meet the requirements of the ENS can use LZA ENS to quickly modify and add customized security controls and then execute the scaled deployment of these controls to their accounts in the landing zone. One of the customizations included in LZA ENS is the integration of the open source security tool Prowler with Security Hub as an automated auditing tool with the objective of providing an up-to-date view of compliance with ENS controls. In addition, by providing a base designed for security and the flexibility to add custom controls, LZA ENS can support the process of achieving and maintaining compliance with the ENS in the AWS Cloud environment.

The CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A guide represents an important step forward in standardizing secure cloud deployments for Spanish public sector organizations and those working with government entities. This publication demonstrates the AWS commitment to support organizations in their secure cloud adoption journey while maintaining compliance with national security standards.
 


Spanish version

CCN publica la guía para las Zonas de Aterrizaje del ENS con AWS Landing Zone Accelerator

El Centro Criptológico Nacional de España (CCN) ha publicado una nueva guía STIC (CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A) que proporciona una plantilla de código y material de soporte para implementar zonas de aterrizaje (o landing zones) que cumplan con el Esquema Nacional de Seguridad del Real Decreto 311/2022 (ENS) mediante el Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS. El ENS establece un marco común de principios básicos, requisitos y medidas de seguridad para las organizaciones del sector público español y sus prestadores de servicios, incluyendo la cadena de suministro. A lo largo de los años, la colaboración entre Amazon Web Services (AWS) y el CCN se ha traducido en la publicación de ocho guías de configuración segura (serie STIC 887) que proporcionan consejo sobre la configuración de los servicios de AWS para alinearse con el ENS. La guía CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A es la última incorporación a esta serie.

La pieza central de la nueva guía es la plantilla ENS para el AWS Landing Zone Accelerator (LZA ENS). Una zona de aterrizaje (landing zone) sirve como la configuración inicial del entorno en la nube de una organización, e incluye la implementación inicial de controles de seguridad, la administración del acceso y los marcos de cumplimiento. El AWS Landing Zone Accelerator es una potente herramienta de código abierto creada por AWS para las organizaciones que desean implementar de forma rápida, segura, personalizada y automatizada zonas de aterrizaje alineadas con las prácticas recomendadas de AWS, así como con marcos de conformidad. Esta herramienta proporciona una solución integral que, mediante código, configura automáticamente más de 35 servicios de AWS con un conjunto simplificado de archivos de configuración para administrar y gobernar un entorno multicuenta, lo que ayuda a los clientes con cargas de trabajo altamente reguladas y requisitos de cumplimiento normativo.

La guía CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A se centra específicamente en ayudar a las organizaciones a implementar desde cero zonas de aterrizaje que cumplan con los requisitos de seguridad del ENS. Ofrece instrucciones y plantillas detalladas para establecer una zona de aterrizaje – la infraestructura básica necesaria para un entorno de nube seguro y bien administrado – así como una matriz de control para demostrar el cumplimiento de los controles del ENS.

Los componentes clave incluidos en la guía STIC 887H incluyen:

  • Registro y monitoreo: LZA ENS realiza una activación por defecto y a escala de los servicios de registro y monitoreo necesarios en AWS (como AWS CloudTrail, Amazon CloudWatch, AWS Security Hub, y AWS GuardDuty) para cumplir con los requisitos de monitoreo del ENS.
  • Control de acceso: LZA ENS implementa los métodos y políticas de administración de identidades y accesos a escala, que se alinean con los requisitos de control de acceso del ENS de manera centralizada mediante AWS IAM Identity Center..
  • Administración de activos: De forma predeterminada, el LZA ENS activa las funciones de inventario y las políticas de etiquetado de recursos e inventario (por ejemplo AWS Config) que soportan los controles de administración de activos del ENS.
  • Topología de red: LZA ENS se puede utilizar para implementar una topología de red centralizada de acuerdo con los controles de seguridad de red ENS.
  • Criptografía: las capacidades de activación de cifrado integradas en la LZA ayudan a organizaciones a alinearse con los estándares de protección de datos del ENS mediante el cifrado obligatorio en reposo, los mecanismos de aplicación con AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) y los mecanismos de supervisión para detectar datos y comunicaciones no cifrados con las reglas de AWS Config.
  • Cumplimiento y residencia de datos: LZA ENS incluye políticas de control para promover el uso de los servicios de AWS con la certificación del ENS Alto y realizar el procesamiento en AWS de acuerdo con los requisitos de residencia de datos del cliente.

Las organizaciones que requieren personalizaciones específicas para cumplir plenamente los requisitos del ENS pueden usar el LZA ENS para modificar rápidamente y añadir fácilmente controles de seguridad personalizados y ejecutar la implementación a escala de estos controles en sus cuentas de la zona de aterrizaje. Una de las personalizaciones que hemos incluido en el LZA ENS es la integración de Prowler con AWS Security Hub como una herramienta de auditoría automatizada, con el objetivo de proporcionar una visión actualizada del cumplimiento de los controles ENS de una manera fácil y eficaz. Además, al proporcionar una base diseñada para la seguridad y la flexibilidad de agregar controles personalizados, LZA ENS puede ayudar durante el proceso de obtener la conformidad con el ENS en el entorno de nube de AWS.

La guía CCN-STIC-887 Anexo A representa un importante paso adelante en la estandarización de las implementaciones seguras en la nube para las organizaciones del sector público español. Esta publicación demuestra el compromiso de AWS de apoyar a las organizaciones en su proceso de adopción segura de la nube, manteniendo al mismo tiempo el cumplimiento de las normas de seguridad nacionales.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Tomás Clemente Sánchez
Tomás Clemente Sánchez

Tomás Clemente Sánchez is a Principal Security Solutions Architect at AWS, based in Madrid, Spain. He works advising highly regulated customers in public sector and national security organizations on the implementation of cloud security technologies and data protection frameworks. Outside of work, he is addicted to cinema and sci-fi novels, a rugby fan, and a scuba diver.

Using OSCAL to express Canadian cybersecurity requirements as compliance-as-code

Post Syndicated from Michael Davie original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/using-oscal-to-express-canadian-cybersecurity-requirements-as-compliance-as-code/

The Open Security Controls Assessment Language (OSCAL) is a project led by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that allows security professionals to express control-related information in machine-readable formats. Expressing compliance information in this way allows security practitioners to use automated tools to support data analysis, while making it easier to address downstream requirements such as translation and accessibility. In the United States, Amazon Web Services (AWS) has collaborated closely with NIST and the FedRAMP program to advance the adoption of OSCAL, and was the first cloud service provider to submit a FedRAMP system security plan (SSP) in OSCAL format in 2022.

In Canada, the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS) is the national technical authority for cybersecurity. CCCS publishes cybersecurity advice and guidance, including ITSG-33 Annex 3A, a catalog of security controls based on NIST Special Publication 800-53. When CCCS recently published new cloud security profiles based on NIST 800-53 Revision 5, we undertook a project to encode the relevant information in OSCAL. Expressing CCCS’s catalog and profile information in OSCAL facilitates automated analysis, including comparisons with OSCAL catalogs and profiles published by NIST and FedRAMP. This post explores the approach we took to express CCCS’s profiles in OSCAL, in addition to opportunities for future work.

OSCAL fundamentals

For the purposes of this discussion, there are two important OSCAL concepts to understand: catalogs and profiles. A catalog is a collection of security controls, such as NIST 800-53 or ITSG-33. An OSCAL catalog expresses control-specific information, including statements, parameters, and implementation guidance, in a structured and machine-readable format using either JSON, XML, or YAML.

OSCAL profiles import controls from catalogs (and other profiles) and express more specific implementation guidance. For example, the FedRAMP Moderate profile selects a subset of controls from NIST 800-53, specifies constraints for certain parameters, and provides assessment guidance. Profiles can also modify controls as they’re imported, which proved very useful for our purposes.

Expressing CCCS controls in OSCAL

Because CCCS’s ITSG-33 is based on NIST 800-53, most NIST controls can be used in CCCS profiles without modification. However, in some cases CCCS has modified the language of NIST 800-53 controls; for example, to replace mentions of a US agency or standard with a Canadian equivalent, or to add additional content specific to CCCS. Therefore, the first step in expressing CCCS requirements in OSCAL was to create a profile that makes the necessary control-level modifications. In some cases, CCCS has also created controls that are not part of NIST 800-53; these are specified in a separate catalog.

When an OSCAL profile is resolved, the information from the upstream catalogs and profiles that it’s importing controls from is assembled—along with modifications—and expressed as a catalog. By resolving the ITSG-33 modifications profile, we can programmatically generate the complete ITSG-33 catalog, incorporating NIST 800-53 controls, CCCS controls, and required modifications.

CCCS cloud security profiles

CCCS has created two profiles that are used to assess the security of cloud services: CCCS Medium and Protected B High Value Assets (PBHVA). Each of these profiles specifies a selection of controls from ITSG-33, in addition to the values for a number of parameters. Working backwards from the profiles published by CCCS as spreadsheets, we extracted the control and parameter information from each profile and expressed them in OSCAL. This exercise also informed the creation of the ITSG-33 modifications profile discussed previously, which captured control-level changes made by CCCS to NIST 800-53 controls, as well as the separate catalog of CCCS-specific controls.

Resources

In support of furthering this work within the Canadian security community, we’ve published the OSCAL files that we created as part of this project on GitHub, including:

  • CCCS-specific control catalog
  • ITSG-33 modifications profile and resolved catalog
  • CCCS Medium profile, resolved catalog, and CSV
  • PBVHA profile, resolved catalog, and CSV

We used an open-source tool, oscal-cli, to validate the structure of the OSCAL files that we created and to resolve the profiles into catalogs.

Future work

AWS is interested in further exploring the use of OSCAL to help us and our customers adhere to CCCS requirements as efficiently as possible. In the future, we want to explore how OSCAL data and tools can be used to support the efficient translation of the ITSG-33 catalog and CCCS profiles into French and the presentation of compliance information in accessible formats.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.

Michael Davie

Michael Davie

Michael is the Canada lead for Amazon Web Services (AWS) Security Assurance. He works with customers, regulators, and AWS teams to help raise the bar on secure cloud adoption and usage. Michael has more than 20 years of experience working in the defence, intelligence, and technology sectors in Canada, and is a licensed professional engineer.

AWS completes the CCCS PBHVA assessment with 149 services and features in scope

Post Syndicated from Naranjan Goklani original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/aws-completes-the-cccs-pbhva-assessment-with-149-services-and-features-in-scope/

We continue to expand the scope of our assurance programs at Amazon Web Services (AWS) and are pleased to announce the successful completion of our first ever Protected B High Value Assets (PBHVA) assessment with 149 assessed services and features. Completion of this assessment effective October 4, 2024, makes AWS the first cloud service provider (CSP) in Canada to meet this high security bar and provide assurance to our valued customers. This assessment also re-affirms our commitment to helping public and commercial customers achieve and maintain the highest-grade security standard for workloads with increased sensitivity.

What is the PBHVA assessment and why is it important?

The Protected B High Value Asset (PBHVA) overlay seeks to enhance the integrity and availability of customer organizational workloads that are considered to have an increased level of sensitivity. These are systems that the Government of Canada (GC) and its service providers use to support delivery of services at a national scale or that are determined to be significant for handling sensitive information. The overlay is a set of 117 controls from the ITSG-33 security control catalogue (baselined against NIST 800-53), which augments the security safeguards to enhance integrity and availability.

As of October 4, 2024, there are a total of 149 AWS services and features that were assessed by the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS) under PBHVA assessment criteria. The assessment covers services and features that are available in both the Canada (Central) and Canada West (Calgary) AWS Regions.

How can you access the assessment?

The summary assessment is available through AWS Artifact. You can also learn more about the PBHVA assessment on our AWS PBHVA webpage.

AWS strives to continuously bring services into scope of its compliance programs to help you meet your architectural and regulatory needs. Please reach out to your AWS account team if you have questions or feedback about the PBHVA assessment.

To learn more about our compliance and security programs, see AWS Compliance Programs. As always, we value your feedback and questions; reach out to the AWS Compliance team through the Contact Us page.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.

Naranjan Goklani

Naranjan is an Audit Lead for Canada. He has experience leading audits, attestations, certifications, and assessments across the Americas. Naranjan has more than 15 years of experience in risk management, security assurance, and performing technology audits. He previously worked in one of the Big 4 accounting firms and supported clients from the financial services, technology, retail, and utilities industries.

2024 ISO and CSA STAR certificates now available with two additional services

Post Syndicated from Atulsing Patil original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/2024-iso-and-csa-star-certificates-now-available-with-two-additional-services/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) successfully completed a surveillance audit with no findings for ISO 9001:2015, 27001:2022, 27017:2015, 27018:2019, 27701:2019, 20000-1:2018, and 22301:2019, and Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) STAR Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0. EY CertifyPoint auditors conducted the audit and reissued the certificates on November 29, 2024. The objective of the audit was to assess the level of compliance with the requirements of the applicable international standards.

During this surveillance audit, we added two additional AWS services to the scope since the last certification issued on July 22, 2024:

For a full list of AWS services that are certified under ISO and CSA STAR, see the AWS ISO and CSA STAR Certified page. Customers can also access the certifications in the AWS Management Console through AWS Artifact.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
 

Atul Patil

Atulsing Patil
Atulsing is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He has 27 years of consulting experience in information technology and information security management. Atulsing holds a Master of Science in Electronics degree and professional certifications such as CCSP, CISSP, CISM, CDPSE, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, HITRUST CSF, Archer Certified Consultant, and AWS CCP.

Nimesh Ravas

Nimesh Ravasa
Nimesh is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security and privacy initiatives within AWS. Nimesh has 15 years of experience in information security and holds CISSP, CDPSE, CISA, PMP, CSX, AWS Solutions Architect – Associate, and AWS Security Specialty certifications.

Chinmaee Parulekar

Chinmaee Parulekar
Chinmaee is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. She has 5 years of experience in information security. Chinmaee holds a Master of Science degree in Management Information Systems and professional certifications such as CISA.

Updated PCI DSS and PCI PIN compliance packages now available

Post Syndicated from Nivetha Chandran original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/updated-pci-dss-and-pci-pin-compliance-packages-now-available/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is pleased to announce enhancements to our Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance portfolio, further empowering AWS customers to build and manage secure, compliant payment environments with greater ease and flexibility.

PCI Data Security Standard (DSS): Our latest AWS PCI DSS v4 Attestation of Compliance (AOC) is now available and includes six additional AWS services:

This expansion allows you to use these services while maintaining PCI DSS compliance, enabling innovation without compromising security. You can see the full list of services at AWS Services in Scope by Compliance Program.

PCI Personal Identification Number (PIN): We updated our PCI PIN AOC for two critical services:

  • AWS CloudHSM: Manage your encryption keys on FIPS 140-2 Level 3 certified hardware in your own virtual private cloud (VPC), with a dedicated, single-tenant hardware security module (HSM) solution.
  • AWS Payment Cryptography: Use payment HSMs that are PCI PIN Transaction Security (PTS) HSM certified and fully managed by AWS, with PCI PIN and point-to-point encryption (P2PE)–compliant key management.

These refreshed attestations offer you greater flexibility in deploying regulated workloads while significantly reducing your compliance overhead. You can access the PCI DSS and PIN AOC reports through AWS Artifact. This self-service portal provides on-demand access to AWS compliance reports, streamlining your audit processes.

To learn more about our PCI programs and other compliance and security programs, see the AWS Compliance Programs page. As always, we value your feedback and questions; reach out to the AWS Compliance team through the Compliance Support page.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Nivetha Chandran
Nivetha Chandran

Nivetha is a Security Assurance Manager at AWS, where she leads multiple security and compliance initiatives. Nivetha has over ten years of experience in security assurance and holds a master’s degree in information management from the University of Washington.

Fall 2024 SOC 1, 2, and 3 reports now available with 183 services in scope

Post Syndicated from Paul Hong original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/fall-2024-soc-1-2-and-3-reports-now-available-with-183-services-in-scope/

We continue to expand the scope of our assurance programs at Amazon Web Services (AWS) and are pleased to announce that the Fall 2024 System and Organization Controls (SOC) 1, 2, and 3 reports are now available. The reports cover 183 services over the 12-month period from October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024, so that customers have a full year of assurance with the reports. These reports demonstrate our continuous commitment to adhere to the heightened expectations for cloud service providers.

Going forward, we will issue SOC reports covering a 12-month period each quarter as follows:

Report Period covered
Spring SOC 1, 2, and 3 April 1–March 31
Summer SOC 1 July 1–June 30
Fall SOC 1, 2, and 3 October 1–September 30
WWinter SOC 1 January 1–December 31

Customers can download the Fall 2024 SOC 1, 2, and 3 reports through AWS Artifact, a self-service portal for on-demand access to AWS compliance reports. Sign in to AWS Artifact in the AWS Management Console, or learn more at Getting Started with AWS Artifact.

AWS strives to continuously bring services into the scope of its compliance programs to help you meet your architectural and regulatory needs. If you have questions or feedback about SOC compliance, reach out to your AWS account team.

To learn more about our compliance and security programs, see AWS Compliance Programs. As always, we value your feedback and questions; reach out to the AWS Compliance team through the Contact Us page.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
 

Paul Hong

Paul Hong
Paul is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS. He leads multiple security, compliance, and training initiatives within AWS, and has over 10 years of experience in security assurance. Paul holds CISSP, CEH, and CPA certifications. He has a master’s degree in accounting information systems and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from James Madison University, Virginia.

Tushar Jain

Tushar Jain
Tushar is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS, where he leads multiple security and privacy initiatives. Tushar holds a master of business administration degree from Indian Institute of Management in Shillong, India and a bachelor of technology in electronics and telecommunication engineering from Marathwada University, India. He has over 12 years of experience in information security and holds CCSK and CSXF certifications.

Michael Murphy

Michael Murphy
Michael is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS, where he leads multiple security and privacy initiatives. Michael has 12 years of experience in information security. He holds a master’s degree and a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology. He also holds CISSP, CRISC, CISA, and CISM certifications.

Nathan Samuel

Nathan Samuel
Nathan is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS, where he leads multiple security and privacy initiatives. Nathan has a bachelor of commerce degree from the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, and has over 21 years of experience in security assurance. He holds the CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, CISM, CDPSE, and Certified Internal Auditor certifications.

ryan wilks

Ryan Wilks
Ryan is a Compliance Program Manager at AWS, where he leads multiple security and privacy initiatives. Ryan has 13 years of experience in information security. He has a bachelor of arts degree from Rutgers University and holds ITIL, CISM, and CISA certifications.

AWS-LC FIPS 3.0: First cryptographic library to include ML-KEM in FIPS 140-3 validation

Post Syndicated from Jake Massimo original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/aws-lc-fips-3-0-first-cryptographic-library-to-include-ml-kem-in-fips-140-3-validation/

We’re excited to announce that AWS-LC FIPS 3.0 has been added to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) modules in process list. This latest validation of AWS-LC introduces support for Module Lattice-Based Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (ML-KEM), the new FIPS standardized post-quantum cryptographic algorithm. This is a significant step towards enhancing the long-term confidentiality of our most sensitive customer workflows, including U.S. federal government communications.

This validation makes AWS LibCrypto (AWS-LC) the first open source cryptographic module to provide post-quantum algorithm support within the FIPS module. Organizations that require FIPS-validated cryptographic modules—such as those operating under FedRAMP, FISMA, HIPAA, and other federal compliance frameworks—can now use these algorithms within AWS-LC.

This announcement is part of the long-term promise made by AWS-LC of continuous validation to obtain new FIPS 140-3 certificates. AWS-LC obtained its first certificate in October 2023 for AWS-LC-FIPS 1.0. A subsequent version of the library, AWS-LC-FIPS 2.0, was certified in October 2024. In this post, we discuss our FIPS-validation of post-quantum cryptographic algorithm ML-KEM, the performance improvements of existing algorithms in AWS-LC FIPS 2.0 and 3.0, and the new algorithm support added for version 3.0. We also discuss how you can use the new algorithms to implement hybrid post-quantum cipher suites, along with configuration options that you can set up today to help protect against future threats.

FIPS post-quantum cryptography

Large-scale quantum computers pose a threat to the long-term confidentiality of the data that we protect under public-key cryptography today. In what’s known as a record-now, decrypt-later attack, an adversary records internet traffic today, capturing key exchanges and encrypted communication. Then, when a sufficiently powerful quantum computer is available, the adversary can retroactively recover shared secrets and encryption keys by solving the underlying hardness problem.

ML-KEM is one of the new key encapsulation mechanisms that’s being standardized by NIST in an effort to protect the uses of public key cryptography from quantum threats. Much like RSA, Diffie-Hellman (DH), or Elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) key exchange, it works by establishing a shared secret between two parties. However, unlike RSA or DH, ML-KEM bases the key exchange on an underlying problem that is believed to be hard for quantum computers to solve.

Today, we don’t know how to build such a large-scale quantum computer. Significant scientific research is needed before such a computer can be built. However, you can mitigate the risk of record-now, decrypt-later attacks by introducing post-quantum algorithms such as ML-KEM into your key exchange protocols today. We recommend adopting a hybrid key exchange approach that combines a traditional key exchange method—such as ECDH—with ML-KEM to hedge against current and future adversaries. Later in this post, we show you how you can implement hybrid post-quantum cipher suites today to protect against future threats.

AWS-LC FIPS 3.0 includes the ML-KEM algorithm for all three provided parameter sets, ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, and ML-KEM-1024. The three parameter sets provide differing levels of security strength as specified by NIST (see FIPS 203 [9, Sect. 5.6] or the post-quantum security evaluation criteria). ML-KEM-768 is recommended for general-purpose use cases, ML-KEM-1024 is designed for applications that require a higher security level or adherence to explicit directives such as the Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite (CNSA) 2.0 for National Security System owners and operators.

Algorithm NIST security category Public key (B) Private key (B) Ciphertext (B)
ML-KEM-512 1 800 1632 768
ML-KEM-768 3 1184 2400 1088
ML-KEM-1024 5 1568 3168 1568

Table 1. Security strength category, public key, private key, and ciphertext sizes in bytes for the three parameter sets of ML-KEM

Integration with s2n-tls

ML-KEM is now available in our open source TLS implementation, s2n-tls, through hybrid key exchange for TLS 1.3 (draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design). We’ve also added support for hybrid ECDHE-ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3 (draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem), along with new key share identifiers for Curve x25519 and ML-KEM-768.

For hybrid key establishment in FIPS 140-approved mode, one component algorithm must be a NIST-approved mechanism (detailed in NIST post-quantum FAQs). With ML-KEM added to the list of NIST-approved algorithms, you can now include non-FIPS standardized algorithms like Curve x25519 in hybrid cipher suites. By configuring your TLS cipher suite to use ML-KEM-768 and x25519 (draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem), you can use x25519 within a FIPS-validated cryptographic module for the first time. This can facilitate more efficient key exchange through the highly optimized and functionally verified Curve x25519 implementation provided by AWS-LC.

New algorithms and new implementations

Two integral parts of our commitment to continuous validation of AWS-LC FIPS are to include new algorithms as approved cryptographic services and new implementations of existing algorithms that provide performance improvements and functional correctness.

New algorithms

We’re committed to continually validating new algorithms so that builders can adopt FIPS-validated cryptography by including the latest revisions of approved cryptographic algorithms and supporting new primitives. Validating new algorithms in their latest standardized revision helps ensure that our cryptographic tool-kit is providing high-assurance implementations that achieve compliance with globally recognized standards.

In AWS-LC FIPS 3.0 we’ve added the latest member of the Secure Hash Algorithm standard SHA-3 to the module. The SHA-3 family is a cryptographic primitive used to support a variety of algorithms. In AWS-LC FIPS 3.0, we’ve integrated ECDSA and RSA signature generation and verification with SHA-3 and within the post-quantum algorithm ML-KEM. In AWS-LC, ML-KEM calls into our FIPS-validated SHA-3 functions, which provide optimized implementations of SHA-3 and SHAKE hashing procedures. This means that as we continually refine and optimize our AWS-LC SHA-3 implementation, we’ll continue to see performance increases across algorithms that use the primitive, such as ML-KEM.

EdDSA is a digital signature algorithm based on elliptic curves using the curve Ed25519. It was added to NIST’s updated Digital Signature Standard (DSS), FIPS 186-5. This signature algorithm is now offered as part of the AWS-LC 3.0 FIPS module. For key agreement, the Single-step Key Derivation Function (SSKDF) used to derive keys from a shared secret (SP 800-56Cr2) is available both in the digest-based and HMAC-based specifications. It can be used, for example, to derive a key from a shared secret produced by KMS when using ECDH. Further keys can be derived from that original key using a Key-based Key Derivation Function (KBKDF)—SP 800-108r1—which is available using a counter-mode based on HMAC.

Performance improvements

We focused on increasing the performance of public-key cryptography algorithms widely used in transport protocols such as the TLS protocol. For example, RSA signatures on Graviton2 are 81 percent faster for bit-length 2048, 33 percent for 3072, and 94 percent for 4096, with added formal verification of functional correctness of the main operation. Using Intel’s AVX512 Integer Fused Multiply Add (IFMA) instructions—available starting from 3rd Gen Intel Xeon—Intel developers contributed an RSA implementation that employs these instruction and the wide AVX512 registers, which are twice as fast as the existing implementation.

We increased throughput for EdDSA signing by an average of 108 percent and for verifying by 37 percent. This average is taken over three environments: Graviton2, Graviton3, and Intel Ice Lake (Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C CPU). This boost in performance is achieved by integrating assembly implementations of the core operation for each target from the s2n-bignum library. That, in addition to the careful constant-time implementation of the core operations, is how each one has been proven to be functionally correct.

In Figure 1 that follows, we highlight the percentage of performance improvements compared to AWS-LC FIPS 1.0 in versions 2.0 and 3.0. The improvements achieved in 2.0 are maintained in 3.0 and are not repeated in the graph. The graph also includes symmetric-key improvements. In AES-256-GCM, which is widely used in TLS to encrypt the communication after the session has been established, the increase is on average 115 percent across Intel Ice Lake and Graviton4 to encrypt a 16 KB message. In AES-256-XTS, which is used in disk storage, encrypting a 256 B input is 360 percent faster on Intel Ice Lake and 90 percent faster on Graviton4.

Figure 1: Graph of performance improvements in versions 2.0 and 3.0 of AWS-LC FIPS

Figure 1: Graph of performance improvements in versions 2.0 and 3.0 of AWS-LC FIPS

How to use ML-KEM today

You can configure both s2n-tls and AWS-LC TLS libraries to enable hybrid post-quantum security with ML-KEM today by enabling X25519MLKEM768 and SecP256r1MLKEM768 for key exchange. We’ve integrated support for both of these hybrid algorithms in AWS-LC libssl and s2n-tls using each library’s exisiting TLS configuration APIs. To negotiate a TLS connection, use one of the following commands:

# AWS-LC Client CLI Example
./aws-lc/build/tool/bssl s_client -curves X25519MLKEM768:SecP256r1MLKEM768:X25519 -connect <hostname>:<port>
# S2N-tls Client CLI Example
./s2n/build/bin/s2nc -c default_pq -i <hostname> <port>

Conclusion

In this post, we described the ongoing development, optimization, and validation of the cryptography that we provide to our customers and products through our open source cryptographic library, AWS-LC. We introduced the addition of FIPS-validated post-quantum algorithms and provided configuration options to begin using these algorithms today to protect against future threats.

AWS-LC-FIPS 3.0 is part of our commitment to continually validate new versions of AWS-LC as we add new algorithms within the FIPS boundary as they become specified, and as we raise the performance and formal verification bar on existing algorithms. Through this commitment, we continue to support the wider developer community of Rust, Java and Python developers by providing integrations into the AWS Libcrypto for Rust (aws-lc-rs) and ACCP 2.0 libraries. We facilitate integration into CPython so that you can build against AWS-LC and use it for all cryptography in the Python standard library. We enabled rustls to provide FIPS support.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Jake Massimo
Jake Massimo

Jake is an Applied Scientist on the AWS Cryptography team. His work interfaces Amazon with the global cryptographic community through participation in international conferences, academic literature, and standards organizations with a goal of influencing the adoption of post-quantum cloud-scale cryptographic technology. Recently, his focus has been developing the AWS cryptography library to support post-quantum migration.
Nevine Ebeid
Nevine Ebeid

Nevine is a Senior Applied Scientist at AWS Cryptography where she focuses on algorithms development, machine-level optimizations and FIPS 140-3 requirements for AWS-LC, the cryptographic library of AWS. Prior to joining AWS, Nevine worked in the research and development of various cryptographic libraries and protocols in automotive and mobile security applications.

AWS Network Firewall Geographic IP Filtering launch

Post Syndicated from Prasanjit Tiwari original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/aws-network-firewall-geographic-ip-filtering-launch/

AWS Network Firewall is a managed service that provides a convenient way to deploy essential network protections for your virtual private clouds (VPCs). In this blog post, we discuss Geographic IP Filtering, a new feature of Network Firewall that you can use to filter traffic based on geographic location and meet compliance requirements.

Customers with internet-facing applications are constantly in need of advanced security features to protect their applications from threat actors. This includes restricting traffic to and from their workloads in Amazon Web Services (AWS) to certain geographies because of security risk. Customers operating in highly regulated industries—such as banking, public sector, or insurance—might have specific security requirements that can be addressed by Geographic IP Filtering.

Previously, customers had to rely on third-party tools for retrieving an IP address list of specific countries and updating their firewall rules on a regular basis to meet applicable requirements. Now, with Geographic IP Filtering on Network Firewall, you can protect your application workloads based on the geolocation of the IP address. As new IP addresses are assigned by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), the Geographic IP database underneath Network Firewall is automatically updated so that the service can consistently filter inbound and outbound traffic from specific countries based on country codes. It supports IPv4 and IPv6 traffic.

Geographic IP Filtering is supported in all AWS Regions where Network Firewall is available today, including the AWS GovCloud (US) Regions.

Set up Geographic IP Filtering in Network Firewall

You can use Network Firewall to inspect network traffic and protect your VPCs using layer 3–7 rules (network layer to application layer of the OSI model). When traffic reaches Network Firewall, it will identify the location of the source and destination IP address from the Geographic IP database and block traffic if you have a firewall rule to block that location. You can choose to pass, drop, reject, or create an alert for traffic coming from or going to specific countries.

Before setting up Geographic IP Filtering rules, you need to deploy Network Firewall and attach a firewall policy. You can learn more about these steps in the Network Firewall Getting Started guide. You can configure Network Firewall Geographic IP Filtering in minutes using the AWS Management Console, AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI), AWS SDK, or the Network Firewall API.

To configure Geographic IP Filtering rules using the console:

  1. Sign in to the AWS Management Console and open the Amazon VPC console.
  2. In the navigation pane, under Network Firewall, choose Network Firewall rule groups.
  3. Choose Create rule group.
  4. In the Create rule group page, for the Rule group type, select Stateful rule group.
  5. For the Rule group format, select Standard stateful rule.
  6. For Rule evaluation order, select either Strict order (recommended) or Action order.
  7. Enter a name for the stateful rule group.
  8. For Capacity, enter the maximum capacity you want to allow for the stateful rule group.
  9. Under Standard stateful rules, for Geographic IP Filtering, select whether you want to Disable Geographic IP filtering, Match only selected countries, or Match all but selected countries.
  10. If you opt for Geographic IP Filtering, then select the Geographic IP traffic direction and Country codes that you want to filter the traffic for.
  11. Enter the appropriate values for Protocol, Source, Source port, Destination, and Destination port.
  12. For Action, select the action that you want Network Firewall to take when a packet matches the rule settings.

    Figure 1: Standard stateful rule

    Figure 1: Standard stateful rule

  13. Click Add rule and then review the rule to create the rule group.

    Figure 2: Geographic IP Filtering rules

    Figure 2: Geographic IP Filtering rules

Suricata compatibility

You can also use Geographic IP filtering with Suricata-compatible rule strings using the geoip keyword.

To create a Suricata compatible rule string:

  1. Follow steps 1 through 4 of the previous procedure.
  2. For the Rule group format, select Suricata compatible rule string.
  3. For Rule evaluation order, select either Strict order (recommended) or Action order.
  4. Enter a name for the stateful rule group.
  5. For Capacity, enter the maximum capacity you want to allow for the stateful rule group.
  6. Under Suricata compatible rule string, enter an appropriate string based on your source and destination along with the country code to filter traffic for. To use a Geographic IP filter, provide the geoip keyword, the filter type, and the country codes for the countries that you want to filter for.
  7. Suricata supports filtering for source and destination IPs. You can filter on either of these types by itself, by specifying dst or src. You can filter on the two types together with AND or OR logic, by specifying both or any.

For example, the following sample Suricata rule string drops traffic originating from Japan:

drop ip any any -> any any (msg:"Geographic IP from JP,Japan"; geoip:src,JP; sid:55555555; rev:1;)

Note that Suricata determines the location of requests using MaxMind GeoIP databases. MaxMind reports very high accuracy of their data at the country level, although accuracy varies according to factors such as country and type of IP. For more information about MaxMind, see MaxMind IP Geolocation.

If you think any of the Geographic IP data is incorrect, you can submit a correction request to MaxMind at MaxMind Correct GeoIP Data.

Logging Geographic IP Filtering

You can configure Network Firewall logging for your firewall’s stateful engine to get detailed information about the packet and any stateful rule action taken against the packet. There are no changes to the logging and monitoring mechanism with the introduction of the Geographic IP Filtering feature. However, by explicitly specifying the msg and metadata keywords, you can see additional geographic information in the alert logs that can help with troubleshooting. If these keywords aren’t specified in the Suricata rule string, the log event will not show any geographic information.

Suricata rule examples

In this section, you will find examples of Suricata rule strings to pass, block, reject, and alert on traffic to or from a specific country.

Example 1: To pass ingress traffic from a specific country

The following example passes ingress traffic from India.

Note: The rule evaluation order should be set to Strict for alert logs to be generated in this example. If the rule evaluation order is set to Action, then although the traffic will pass, alert logs will not be generated.

alert ip $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Ingress traffic from IN allowed"; flow:to_server; geoip:src,IN; metadata:geo IN; sid:202409301;)
pass ip $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Ingress traffic from IN allowed"; flow:to_server; geoip:src,IN; metadata:geo IN; sid:202409302;)

The following are the alert and flow logs for Example 1.

Alert logs:

{
    "firewall_name": "Test-NFW",
    "availability_zone": "eu-north-1a",
    "event_timestamp": "1731102856",
    "event": {
        "src_ip": "13.127.20.X",
        "src_port": 56630,
        "event_type": "alert",
        "alert": {
            "severity": 3,
            "signature_id": 202409301,
            "rev": 0,
            "metadata": {
                "geo": ["IN"]
            },
            "signature": "Ingress traffic from IN allowed",
            "action": "allowed",
            "category": ""
        },
        "flow_id": 234143298308779,
        "dest_ip": "172.31.2.4",
        "proto": "TCP",
        "verdict": {
            "action": "pass"
        },
        "dest_port": 80,
        "pkt_src": "geneve encapsulation",
        "timestamp": "2024-11-08T21:54:16.972019+0000",
        "direction": "to_server"
    }
}

Flow logs from source to destination:

{
    "firewall_name": "Test-NFW",
    "availability_zone": "eu-north-1a",
    "event_timestamp": "1731102918",
    "event": {
        "tcp": {
            "tcp_flags": "13",
            "syn": true,
            "fin": true,
            "ack": true
        },
        "app_proto": "unknown",
        "src_ip": "13.127.20.X",
        "src_port": 56630,
        "netflow": {
            "pkts": 4,
            "bytes": 216,
            "start": "2024-11-08T21:54:16.972019+0000",
            "end": "2024-11-08T21:54:17.263030+0000",
            "age": 1,
            "min_ttl": 112,
            "max_ttl": 112
        },
        "event_type": "netflow",
        "flow_id": 234143298308779,
        "dest_ip": "172.31.2.4",
        "proto": "TCP",
        "dest_port": 80,
        "timestamp": "2024-11-08T21:55:18.257416+0000"
    }
}

Flow logs from destination to source:

{
    "firewall_name": "Test-NFW",
    "availability_zone": "eu-north-1a",
    "event_timestamp": "1731102918",
    "event": {
        "tcp": {
            "tcp_flags": "13",
            "syn": true,
            "fin": true,
            "ack": true
        },
        "app_proto": "unknown",
        "src_ip": "172.31.2.4",
        "src_port": 80,
        "netflow": {
            "pkts": 2,
            "bytes": 112,
            "start": "2024-11-08T21:54:16.972019+0000",
            "end": "2024-11-08T21:54:17.263030+0000",
            "age": 1,
            "min_ttl": 126,
            "max_ttl": 126
        },
        "event_type": "netflow",
        "flow_id": 234143298308779,
        "dest_ip": "13.127.20.X",
        "proto": "TCP",
        "dest_port": 56630,
        "timestamp": "2024-11-08T21:55:18.257449+0000"
    }
}

Example 2: To block ingress traffic from a specific country

The following example blocks ingress traffic from Japan.

drop ip $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Ingress traffic from JP blocked"; flow:to_server; geoip:any,JP; metadata:geo JP; sid:202409303;)

Example 3: To block ingress SSH traffic from a specific country

The following example blocks ingress SSH traffic from Russia.

drop ssh $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Ingress SSH traffic from RU blocked"; flow:to_server; geoip:src,RU; metadata:geo RU; sid:202409304;)

Example 4: To reject egress TCP traffic to a specific country:

The following example rejects egress TCP traffic to Iran.

reject tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"Egress traffic to IR rejected"; flow:to_server; geoip:dst,IR; metadata:geo IR; sid:202409305;)

Example 5: To alert on traffic originating from or destined to specific country

The following example alerts on traffic that originates from Venezuela.

alert ip any any -> any any (msg:"Geographic IP is from VE, Venezuela"; geoip:any,VE; sid: 202409306;)

Conclusion

You can use the new Geographic IP Filtering feature in AWS Network Firewall to enhance your security posture by controlling traffic based on geographic locations. In this post, you learned about the key concepts, configuration steps, and examples for implementing the Geographic IP Filtering feature in Network Firewall. By using this feature, businesses can protect their networks from potentially harmful traffic and control which geographic locations can interact with their infrastructure. As cyber threats continue to evolve, the Geographic IP Filtering feature serves as a vital tool for strengthening network security.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Prasanjit Tiwari
Prasanjit Tiwari

Prasanjit is a Cloud Support Engineer II based out of Virginia, USA. He has a Master of Science in Telecommunications Engineering from the University of Maryland. He is a WAF and Route 53 subject matter expert and enjoys working on networking and perimeter security services. He is enthusiastic about using innovative solutions to address customer challenges.
Dhiren Patel
Dhiren Patel

Dhiren is a Cloud Support Engineer-II based out of Virginia, USA. He has a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering from New York University. As a WAF and Route 53 subject matter expert, he specializes in AWS networking and security services. He’s passionate about helping customers solve their AWS issues and get the best cloud experience possible through AWS.

Exploring the benefits of artificial intelligence while maintaining digital sovereignty

Post Syndicated from Max Peterson original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/exploring-benefits-of-artificial-intelligence-while-maintaining-digital-sovereignty/

Around the world, organizations are evaluating and embracing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to drive innovation and efficiency. From accelerating research and enhancing customer experiences to optimizing business processes, improving patient outcomes, and enriching public services, the transformative potential of AI is being realized across sectors. Although using emerging technologies helps drive positive outcomes, leaders worldwide must balance these benefits with the need to maintain security, compliance, and resilience. Many organizations, including those in the public sector and regulated industries, are investing in generative AI applications powered by large language models (LLMs) and other foundation models (FMs) because these applications can transform and scale their work and provide better experiences for customers. Beyond computing power, unlocking this AI potential resides in the AI applications that organizations can create based on a variety of AI/ML development services, models, and data sources. Organizations must navigate the complexity of building AI applications in light of existing and emerging regulatory regimes while verifying that their AI applications and related data are secure, protected, and resilient to risks and threats.

AWS offers a wide range of AI/ML services and capabilities, built on our sovereign-by-design foundation, that are making it simpler for our customers to meet their digital sovereignty needs while getting the security, control, compliance, and resilience that they need. For example, Amazon Bedrock is a fully managed service that offers a choice of high-performing FMs from leading AI companies such as AI21 Labs, Anthropic, Cohere, Meta, Mistral AI, and Stability AI through a single API, along with a broad set of capabilities to build generative AI applications with security, privacy, and responsible AI. Amazon SageMaker provides tools and infrastructure to build, train, and deploy ML models at scale while supporting responsible AI with governance controls and access to pretrained models.

Innovating securely across the AI lifecycle

Security is and always has been our top priority at AWS. AWS customers benefit from our ongoing investment in data centers, networks, custom hardware, and secure software services, built to satisfy the requirements of the most security-sensitive organizations, including the government, healthcare, and financial services. We have always believed that it is essential that customers have control over their data and its location. That’s why we architected the AWS Cloud to be secure and sovereign-by-design from day one. We remain committed to giving our customers more control and choice so that they can use the full power of AWS while meeting their unique digital sovereignty needs.

As organizations develop and implement generative AI, they want to make sure that their data and applications are secured across the AI lifecycle, including data preparation, training, and inferencing. To help ensure the confidentiality and integrity of customer data, all of our Nitro-based Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instances that run ML accelerators such as AWS Inferentia and AWS Trainium, and graphics processing units (GPUs) such as P4, P5, G5, and G6, are backed by the industry-leading security capabilities of the AWS Nitro System. By design, there is no mechanism for anyone at AWS to access Nitro EC2 instances that customers use to run their workloads. The NCC Group, an independent cybersecurity firm, has validated the design of the Nitro System.

We take a secure approach to generative AI and make it practical for our customers to secure their generative AI workloads across the generative AI stack so that they can focus on building and scaling. All AWS services—including generative AI services—support encryption, and we continue to innovate and invest in controls and encryption features that allow our customers to encrypt everything everywhere.

For example, Amazon Bedrock uses encryption to protect data in transit and at rest, and data remains in the AWS Region where Amazon Bedrock is being used. Customer data, such as prompts, completions, custom models, and data used for fine-tuning or continued pre-training, is not used for Amazon Bedrock service improvement and is never shared with third-party model providers. When customers fine-tune a model in Amazon Bedrock, the data is never exposed to the public internet, never leaves the AWS network, is securely transferred through a customer’s virtual private cloud (VPN), and is encrypted in transit and at rest.

SageMaker protects ML model artifacts and other system artifacts by encrypting data in transit and at rest. Amazon Bedrock and SageMaker integrate with AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) so that customers can securely manage cryptographic keys. AWS KMS is designed so that no one—not even AWS employees—can retrieve plaintext keys from the service.

Developing responsibly

The responsible development and use of AI is a priority for AWS. We believe that AI should take a people-centric approach that makes AI safe, fair, secure, and robust. We are committed to supporting customers with responsible AI and helping them build fairer and more transparent AI applications to foster trust, meet regulatory requirements, and use AI to benefit their business and stakeholders. AWS is the first major cloud service provider to announce ISO/IEC 42001 accredited certification for AI services, covering Amazon Bedrock, Amazon Q Business, Amazon Textract, and Amazon Transcribe. ISO/IEC 42001 is an international management system standard that outlines requirements and controls for organizations to promote the responsible development and use of AI systems.

We take responsible AI from theory into practice by providing the necessary tools, guidance, and resources, including Amazon Bedrock Guardrails to help implement safeguards tailored to customer generative AI applications and aligned with their responsible AI policies, or Model Evaluation on Amazon Bedrock to evaluate, compare, and select the best FMs for specific use cases based on custom metrics, such as accuracy, robustness, and toxicity. Additionally, Amazon SageMaker Model Monitor automatically detects and alerts customers of inaccurate predictions from deployed models. We continue to publish AI Service Cards to enhance transparency by providing a single place to find information on the intended use cases and limitations, responsible AI design choices, and performance optimization best practices for our AI services and models.

Building resilience

Resilience plays a pivotal role in the development of any workload, and AI/ML workloads are no different. Customers need to know that their workloads in the cloud will continue to operate in the face of natural disasters, network disruptions, or disruptions due to geopolitical crises. AWS delivers the highest network availability of any cloud provider and is the only cloud provider to offer three or more Availability Zones (AZs) in all Regions, providing more redundancy. Understanding and prioritizing resilience is crucial for generative AI workloads to meet organizational availability and business continuity requirements. We have published guidance on designing generative AI workloads for resilience. To enable higher throughput and enhanced resilience during periods of peak demands in Amazon Bedrock, customers can use cross-region inference to distribute traffic across multiple Regions. For customers with specific European Union data sovereignty requirements, we are launching the AWS European Sovereign Cloud in 2025 to offer an additional layer of control and resilience.

Supporting choice and flexibility

It’s important that customers have access to diverse AI technologies, while having the freedom to choose the right solutions to meet their needs. AWS provides more diversity, choice, and flexibility so that customers can select the AI solution that best aligns with their specific requirements, whether that’s using open-source models, proprietary solutions, or their own custom AI models. For example, we understand the importance of open-source AI in fostering transparency, collaboration, and rapid innovation. Open-source models enable scrutiny of vulnerabilities, drive security improvements, and support research on AI safety. Amazon SageMaker JumpStart provides pretrained, open-source models for a wide range of common use cases. To provide practitioners and developers with the guidance and tools that they need to create secure-by-design AI systems, we are a founding member of the open-source initiative Coalition for Secure AI (CoSAI).

Also, our commitment to portability and interoperability helps ensure that customers can move easily between environments. For customers changing IT providers, we’ve taken concrete steps to lower costs, and AWS is actively engaged in efforts to facilitate switching between cloud providers, including through our support of the Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers in Europe (CISPE) Cloud Switching Framework, which lays out guidance to assist providers and customers in the switching process. This gives organizations the flexibility to adapt their cloud and AI strategies as their needs evolve.

We remain committed to providing customers with a choice of diverse AI technologies, along with secure and compliant ways to build their AI applications throughout the development lifecycle. Through this approach, customers can enhance the security, compliance, and resilience of their systems.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Max Peterson
Max Peterson

Max is the Vice President of AWS Sovereign Cloud. He leads efforts to ensure that AWS customers around the world have the most advanced set of sovereignty controls, privacy safeguards, and security features available in the cloud. Previously, Max served as the VP of AWS Worldwide Public Sector (WWPS) and created and led the WWPS International Sales division, with a focus on empowering government, education, healthcare, aerospace and satellite, and nonprofit organizations to drive rapid innovation while meeting evolving compliance, security, and policy requirements. Max has over 30 years of public sector experience and served in other technology leadership roles before joining Amazon. Max has earned both a Bachelor of Arts in Finance and Master of Business Administration in Management Information Systems from the University of Maryland.

Comparing DORA, SOX and PCI DSS: What Businesses Need to Know

Post Syndicated from Editor original https://nebosystems.eu/comparing-sox-dora-pci-dss/

In today’s interconnected business environment, organizations must navigate an increasingly complex regulatory landscape. Key regulatory requirements such as, the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) are essential in ensuring financial transparency, operational resilience and data security. But what sets them apart and where do they overlap? Let’s explore.

What Are SOX, DORA, and PCI DSS?

  • SOX: Introduced in 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ensures accurate financial reporting and corporate accountability. It applies primarily to U.S.-based public companies, emphasizing internal controls and financial disclosures.
  • DORA: Enacted by the EU, the Digital Operational Resilience Act focuses on digital operational resilience for financial institutions. It establishes robust guidelines for managing ICT (Information and Communication Technology) risks, ensuring businesses can withstand cyber incidents.
  • PCI DSS: A global standard created to secure payment card data, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard applies to any organization handling cardholder information. It mandates rigorous security measures to prevent data breaches.

Key Differences

  SOX DORA PCI DSS
Scope U.S. public companies. (Section 302, 404) EU financial entities. (Article 2) Global organizations handling card data. (Requirement 1)
Primary Concern Financial reporting accuracy. (Section 404) Operational resilience and cybersecurity. (Article 5, Article 6) Payment data security. (Requirement 3, 4)
Enforcement SEC and PCAOB. EU financial regulators. (Article 46) Payment brands (Visa, Mastercard).
Specificity in IT Limited to financial systems. (Section 404) Comprehensive ICT and operational risks. (Article 11, Article 15) Highly prescriptive for payment environments. (Requirement 12)

Overlapping Areas Across SOX, DORA, and PCI DSS

While SOX, DORA, and PCI DSS have distinct scopes, they share common objectives in risk management, incident response and compliance auditing:

  SOX DORA PCI DSS
Risk Management Focuses on risks to financial reporting systems. Emphasizes managing ICT and operational risks. (Article 5, DORA Regulation) Requires mitigating risks to payment data. (Requirement 12)
Incident Response Requires procedures to disclose financial data breaches. (Section 302) Mandates reporting and responding to ICT disruptions. (Article 15) Specifies response plans for payment data breaches. (Requirement 12)
Third-Party Oversight Requires oversight of third parties impacting financial reporting. (Section 404) Regulates third-party ICT providers for financial entities. (Article 28) Ensures third-party service providers comply with security standards. (Requirement 12)
Auditing and Compliance Requires annual audits of internal controls. (Section 404) Implements operational resilience assessments and testing. (Article 7) Demands regular audits and vulnerability scans for payment systems. (PCI DSS v4.0)
Data Integrity Ensures accuracy of financial records. Focuses on maintaining operational and ICT system integrity. (Article 6) Protects cardholder data integrity and confidentiality. (PCI DSS v4.0)

Common Technical Measures to Consider

Although SOX, DORA, and PCI DSS have distinct objectives, they share several technical measures that businesses can implement to align their compliance efforts. These measures not only enhance security but also streamline adherence to multiple frameworks.

Technical Measure SOX DORA PCI DSS
Access Controls User restrictions and authentication. Role-based access and secure authentication (Article 6). Strict access control requirements (Req. 7, 8).
Data Encryption Encryption for sensitive data. Encryption for ICT-related data (Article 6). Encryption of cardholder data (Req. 3, 4).
Monitoring and Logging Log unauthorized access or changes. Logging for ICT incident monitoring (Article 15). System and data access logging (Req. 10).
Testing and Assessments Regular testing of IT controls. Penetration and resilience testing (Article 23). Penetration testing and scans (Req. 11).
Backup and Recovery Backup systems for financial data. Backup and disaster recovery plans (Article 11). Backup solutions for cardholder data (Req. 12).
Network Security Secure networks for data protection. Network defenses (firewalls, IDS) (Article 6). Firewalls, secure configurations (Req. 1, 2).
Multi-Factor Authentication Often recommended. Mandatory for critical ICT systems (Article 6). Required for sensitive systems (Req. 8).

Why This Matters to Your Business

For companies operating in regulated industries or handling sensitive data, understanding these frameworks is critical. Compliance not only protects against fines and reputational damage but also fosters trust among customers and stakeholders.

For example:

  • If your company is a public entity in the U.S., SOX compliance ensures the accuracy of your financial statements.
  • If you’re a financial institution in the EU, DORA equips you to handle cyber risks and operational challenges.
  • Handling payment card transactions, PCI DSS safeguards your customers’ data and strengthens your security posture.

The Cost of Non-Compliance

Failing to comply with SOX, DORA, or PCI DSS doesn’t just result in regulatory scrutiny—it can lead to significant financial penalties, legal liabilities and reputational damage. Here’s a breakdown:

SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

  • Corporate officers who willfully certify false financial statements can face fines up to $5 million and/or imprisonment for up to 20 years​ (Section 906).
  • Tampering with records or obstructing investigations can lead to criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to 20 years​ (Section 802).

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act)

  • Financial entities in violation of DORA can be fined up to 2% of annual global turnover for severe breaches of operational resilience requirements, such as inadequate ICT risk management or failing to report major incidents​.
  • Specific penalties vary by Member State within the EU but are harmonized to ensure consistency and proportionality​.

PCI DSS

Non-compliance penalties are typically imposed by payment brands like Visa and Mastercard. These include:

  • Fines ranging from $5,000 to $100,000 per month until compliance is achieved.
  • Potential revocation of card processing privileges and higher transaction fees​.

How to Align with Multiple Regulatory Requirements

Organizations such as a multinational bank operating in the EU or a retailer processing credit card transactions globally, must comply with multiple regulatory requirements. Here’s how to streamline compliance:

  • Integrated Risk Management: Build policies that address financial, ICT and data security risks holistically.
  • Unified Incident Response Plans: Standardize response procedures for data breaches, cyber disruptions, and financial irregularities. This unified approach minimizes confusion and ensures timely action during incidents.
  • Auditing for All: Conduct comprehensive audits that meet SOX, DORA, and PCI DSS requirements.

Through these measures, organizations can reduce complexity, improve resource utilization, and ensure they remain compliant across all frameworks.

Practical Benefits for Your Business

Adopting a unified approach to compliance doesn’t just meet regulatory obligations—it also delivers practical advantages:

  • Cost Savings: Streamlining risk management and auditing across frameworks reduces duplicated efforts and optimizes resource allocation.
  • Enhanced Security: Implementing shared technical measures like encryption, logging, and access controls improves protection for all critical systems and data.
  • Business Continuity: Resilience testing and incident response plans ensure your organization can recover quickly from disruptions, safeguarding operations and customer trust.

By proactively addressing these frameworks, businesses can turn compliance into a strategic advantage, fostering growth and stability in a competitive marketplace.

In Conclusion

Regulatory requirements like SOX, DORA and PCI DSS provide a robust foundation for financial integrity, operational resilience and data security. By understanding their differences and leveraging their overlaps, businesses can create a compliance strategy that not only meets legal obligations but also drives confidence in their operations.

Need help navigating these regulatory requirements? Contact us for tailored solutions to align your business with today’s compliance standards.


References:

Digital Operational Resilience Act (EU) 2022/2554. EUR-Lex.

Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. Requirements and Testing Procedures, Version 4.0.1, June 2024.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Public Law 107–204, Approved July 30, 2002.