Tag Archives: AWS Secrets Manager

Accelerating AWS Network Firewall troubleshooting with AWS DevOps Agent

Post Syndicated from Salman Ahmed original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/accelerating-aws-network-firewall-troubleshooting-with-aws-devops-agent/

When an administrator introduces a rule change in AWS Network Firewall and network connectivity is disrupted, pinpointing the cause requires inspecting multiple points in the traffic path. The firewall gives you stateless and stateful rule engines, domain rules, and routing to the firewall endpoint inside your Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC). A network drop looks the same from the workload no matter where it started. Isolating the cause means correlating the alert and flow logs with the firewall configuration, route tables, and recent API calls in AWS CloudTrail that might have changed them. That manual correlation is exactly where AWS DevOps Agent helps, accelerating root cause analysis so you can restore connectivity in minutes instead of hours.

AWS DevOps Agent does that correlation for you. As your always-available operations teammate, it resolves and proactively prevents operational issues across AWS, multicloud, and on-premises environments. When an Amazon CloudWatch alarm triggers, it reaches the agent through a webhook. The agent then reads the firewall configuration and logs through AWS APIs, ties the drop to recent API activity, and returns a root cause with a mitigation plan you review before you apply it.

This post connects CloudWatch monitoring to DevOps Agent. It walks through three Network Firewall failures from end to end. The first is a domain deny list blocking a legitimate endpoint. The second is a stateless rule priority misconfiguration. The third is an asymmetric cross Availability Zone (AZ) routing drop. Each maps to a different layer, so each leads down a different investigation path. An AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) app deploys the whole environment in your own account so you can reproduce each failure and follow along.

The sample workload

As part of this blog post, we provide a CDK stack that deploys both the AWS DevOps Agent Space and a sample workload used to walk through three separate troubleshooting scenarios. A single t3.micro instance in a protected subnet checks its connectivity to a test endpoint on a continuous loop and publishes results to CloudWatch. Traffic takes the internet egress path through Network Firewall, the NAT gateway, and the internet gateway, so the firewall can intercept or drop it. After completing the walkthrough, you can apply the same troubleshooting techniques with DevOps Agent against your own Network Firewall deployments.

The test endpoint runs in a separate VPC deployed by the same CDK app. It serves HTTPS on port 443 and TCP on port 9142, giving each scenario a different protocol layer to exercise: Scenario 1 targets a TLS connection on 443 (matched by Server Name Indication), Scenario 2 targets a TCP connection on 9142, and Scenario 3 exercises the whole egress path.

A live status page shows one card per scenario plus the network topology. The whole stack deploys from a single CDK app across two Availability Zones, each with a firewall endpoint and NAT gateway, which is what makes Scenario 3 possible.

As shown in the following figure, the egress data path runs from the workload through Network Firewall and the NAT and internet gateways to the test endpoint. The alarm pipeline runs from CloudWatch through Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) and the webhook AWS Lambda function to DevOps Agent.

Figure 1: The sample workload

Figure 1: The sample workload

To use this with your own workload, you need a CloudWatch alarm that detects the connectivity problem and the webhook pipeline (SNS topic and Lambda function) that delivers it to DevOps Agent. The agent reads your firewall configuration, logs, and CloudTrail through AWS APIs, so no additional instrumentation is needed on the firewall side.

Prerequisites

To follow along with this post, you need:

Deploy the sample workload

Clone the project and deploy it into us-east-1 with one command (set awsRegion to use another AWS Region).

git clone https://github.com/aws-samples/sample-accelerating-aws-network-firewall-troubleshooting-with-aws-devops-agent.git
cd sample-accelerating-aws-network-firewall-troubleshooting-with-aws-devops-agent
bash scripts/deploy.sh

The script checks prerequisites, installs dependencies, compiles and tests, and bootstraps the CDK if needed. It then deploys all the stacks from a clean baseline and prints the outputs, including the status-page URL and sign-in details.

  1. Open the status-page link (an https://<random-id>.cloudfront.net address).
  2. Sign in using the username and password provided from the CDK output and confirm all three cards show the green Healthy status.
  3. Keep the page open while you run the scenarios.

Connect AWS DevOps Agent

To connect AWS DevOps Agent to the alarm pipeline

  1. In the AWS DevOps Agent console, open the nf-devops-agent-space Agent Space created by the CDK deployment.
  2. Configure the DevOps Agent webhook and download the CSV file with the webhook URL and signing secret.
  3. On the status page, choose Configure webhook, paste the URL and signing secret, and save. The page writes them to the nf-devops-agent-webhook-credentials AWS Secrets Manager secret, so there is no AWS CLI or console step. Until you set it, the bridge Lambda function sees a placeholder and skips delivery.
  4. Verify the path before you run a scenario. In the Lambda console, open nf-devops-agent-webhook and use the Test tab with this event.
    {
      "Records": [
        {
          "Sns": {
            "Message": "{\"AlarmName\":\"TEST-webhook-verification\",\"AlarmDescription\":\"[TEST] Webhook integration test - not a real alarm.\",\"NewStateValue\":\"ALARM\",\"NewStateReason\":\"[TEST] Manual webhook connectivity test. Safe to ignore.\",\"Region\":\"us-east-1\"}"
          }
        }
      ]
    }

  5. A 200 response confirms the path, and a test investigation appears in the DevOps Agent Operator Web App view.

How the alarm pipeline works

Every scenario reaches DevOps Agent the same way. A CloudWatch alarm moves to ALARM and notifies the SNS topic. Amazon SNS invokes a Lambda function. The function reads the webhook URL and signing secret from Secrets Manager, signs an alarm payload, and POSTs it to the DevOps Agent webhook (as shown in Figure 1). Amazon SNS also provides delivery retries, fan-out to other subscribers, and cross-account publishing.

  • Prebuilt Network Firewall metric (Scenario 1) Alarm-1 watches the DroppedPackets metric, summed across the stateful streams, and triggers when drops rise above a baseline threshold. This requires no workload or custom metric and works on an already-deployed firewall. However, it only tells you that the firewall is dropping packets, not which rule is responsible.
  • Application health metric (Scenarios 2 and 3) Alarm-2 and Alarm-3 watch a custom metric from a connectivity check. Use this for an alarm tied to user-facing impact or to tell one traffic path from another, which requires running a component that emits the metric.
Alarm Source Triggers when
Alarm-1 Native AWS/NetworkFirewall DroppedPackets The firewall’s dropped-packet count rises above the baseline
Alarm-2 Custom application health metric The port 9142 (TCP) connectivity check to the test endpoint is being dropped
Alarm-3 Custom application health metric The cross Availability Zone connectivity check is being dropped

Run the scenarios

Work through each of the scenarios one at a time, following the same cycle. Interrupt network connectivity, watch the alarm trigger, let DevOps Agent investigate, apply the recommended fix, and confirm recovery before moving on.

The status-page cards follow the live CloudWatch alarm state. A card shows a green dot and the word Healthy when its alarm is clear, and a red dot and the word DROPPED when its alarm triggers. In the DROPPED state the card also adds a Condition: line describing what’s being dropped, which isn’t shown when the card is healthy. Network Firewall applies changes to new flows, so a change shows within a minute or two. Recovery comes from the mitigation DevOps Agent recommends, which you review and apply.

Scenario 1. Domain deny list blocking a legitimate endpoint

At baseline, the rg-domain Suricata domain rule group denies only an unused placeholder, so the test endpoint stays reachable. The rule group inspects the TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) on each outbound connection and drops any that matches a denied domain. The exact rule syntax and console steps follow.

To add the domain deny rule

  1. Go to the Amazon VPC console.
  2. In the navigation pane, under Network Firewall, choose Network Firewall rule groups.
  3. Choose the rg-domain rule group to open its details page.
  4. In the Rules section, choose Edit.
  5. The rules box already contains two baseline placeholder rules (they match blocked.placeholder.invalid, so nothing real is denied). Leave those in place. Find the <app-endpoint-dns> value for Scenario 1 in the deployment script output (a Nework Load Balancer (NLB) DNS name such as NfTest-AppNl-a1b2C3dEf4G5-1234abcd5678efgh.elb.us-east-1.amazonaws.com). On a new line below the existing rules, add a drop rule that matches that DNS name on the TLS SNI, then choose Save.
    drop tls $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (ssl_state:client_hello; tls.sni; content:"<app-endpoint-dns>"; startswith; nocase; endswith; msg:"S1 domain denylist"; flow:to_server, established; sid:2000002; rev:1;)

  6. After saving, the rules box holds all three lines. The two placeholders remain, plus the new drop rule for the endpoint DNS name (note the distinct sid 2000002).
Figure 2: Scenario 1 – Firewall rule change blocking the connection

Figure 2: Scenario 1 – Firewall rule change blocking the connection

What happens. The workload’s HTTPS check to the test endpoint times out, the “AWS/NetworkFirewall DroppedPackets metric climbs above baseline, and Alarm-1 moves to ALARM. The Scenario 1 card reads DROPPED (with the condition Firewall dropping the monitored domain on its allow/deny rules), while the Scenario 2 and Scenario 3 cards stay Healthy (Figure 3). On the topology, the alarm pipeline from CloudWatch through Amazon SNS and Lambda to DevOps Agent and the workload-to-firewall inspect lines both turn amber, which the legend defines as collateral / alarm active, because the packets are now dropped at the firewall. To demonstrate the resulting failure, the HTTPS · SNI line from the internet gateway to the test endpoint is shown in red, which the legend defines as dropped (root cause).

Figure 3: Scenario 1 active – Traffic blocked at the firewall

Figure 3: Scenario 1 active – Traffic blocked at the firewall

Let DevOps Agent investigate. The agent runs several lines of investigation in parallel and correlates them:

  1. Reads the DroppedPackets metric and correlates the spike with a simultaneous drop in passed packets, confirming the firewall is actively blocking traffic.
  2. Reads the ALERT log and finds the workload’s TLS connections to the test endpoint blocked by the S1 domain denylist rule.
  3. Compares the current state against a baseline window, where the same endpoint was reachable with no alerts, which shows the block is new.
  4. Searches CloudTrail and surfaces the UpdateRuleGroup call that added the deny rule, identifying the user, role, and timestamp approximately one minute before the drops began.
  5. Reports the root cause as that manual rule-group change. Recommends removing the deny entry or adding an allow exception and enabling FirewallPolicyChangeProtection to prevent unauthorized changes.
  6. Presents this as a plan you review and apply, not an automatic change.

In the DevOps Agent Operator Web App view, the agent first restates the Alarm-1 trigger and confirms the firewall is dropping packets above the threshold (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Scenario 1 – The symptom

Figure 4: Scenario 1 – The symptom

Next, the agent identifies the root cause: a manual update to the rg-domain rule group that added a domain deny rule (SID 2000002) shortly before the alarm fired, blocking TLS connections to the ELB endpoint (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Scenario 1 – The root cause

Figure 5: Scenario 1 – The root cause

Finally, the agent presents a mitigation plan, recommending you remove the problematic deny rule (SID 2000002) to restore connectivity (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Scenario 1 – The mitigation plan

Figure 6: Scenario 1 – The mitigation plan

Note: In a real-world environment, this type of rule typically exists for a reason. Before removing it, verify whether it was intentional but scoped too broadly. If so, refine the rule to block only unauthorized endpoints rather than removing it entirely.

Confirm recovery. Apply the change the agent recommends. After the deny entry is gone, DroppedPackets falls back to baseline, Alarm-1 clears, and the card returns to green. Move on to Scenario 2.

Scenario 2. Stateless rule priority misconfiguration

At baseline, the rg-stateless-priority stateless rule group keeps the allow rule at priority 100 and the drop rule at 200 for the test class, TCP destination port 9142. The workload opens a TCP connection to the test endpoint on this port. Lower priority numbers evaluate first, so the allow rule wins. This scenario uses port 9142 instead of 443 to demonstrate a stateless rule, which matches on the packet’s 5-tuple (protocol, ports, addresses) rather than application content.

Introduce the change. Invert the two rule priorities so the drop rule evaluates before the allow rule. This is the kind of change a rushed rule edit can introduce.

To invert the stateless rule priorities

  1. Go to the Amazon VPC console.
  2. In the navigation pane, under Network Firewall, choose Network Firewall rule groups.
  3. Choose the rg-stateless-priority rule group to open its details page.
  4. In the Rules section, choose Edit.
  5. Raise the (Action: Pass) rule’s priority number so it sits after the (Action: Drop) rule, then choose Save. For example, change the (Action: Pass) rule from 100 to 300 (any number higher than the drop rule’s 200 works). You only need to move one rule, and using 300 avoids a clash with the drop rule that already sits at 200. Network Firewall evaluates the lowest priority number first, so the (Action: Drop) rule at 200 now wins for this traffic class, ahead of the (Action: Pass) rule at 300.
Figure 7: Scenario 2 – Rule priority change blocking the traffic class

Figure 7: Scenario 2 – Rule priority change blocking the traffic class

What happens. The drop rule now wins, the TCP connection to the test endpoint on port 9142 times out, the StatelessRuleFailures metric climbs above baseline, and Alarm-2 moves to ALARM. The Scenario 2 card reads DROPPED (with the condition Stateless rules dropping the monitored traffic class), while the Scenario 1 and Scenario 3 cards stay Healthy (Figure 8). On the topology, the alarm pipeline from CloudWatch through Amazon SNS and Lambda to DevOps Agent and the workload-to-firewall inspect lines both turn amber, which the legend defines as collateral / alarm active, because the packets are now dropped at the firewall. To demonstrate the resulting failure, the TLS :9142 line from the internet gateway to the test endpoint is shown in red, which the legend defines as dropped (root cause).

Figure 8: Scenario 2 active

Figure 8: Scenario 2 active

Let DevOps Agent investigate. A stateless drop happens before traffic reaches the stateful inspection engine, so it produces no ALERT log entries. The agent turns to configuration and flow logs instead:

  1. Reads the stateless rule group state and finds the drop rule at the lower priority number, ahead of the pass rule, so the drop evaluates first.
  2. Reads the flow logs and sees passed packets drop to zero within a minute of the change.
  3. Searches CloudTrail and surfaces the UpdateRuleGroup call that inverted the priorities, identifying the user, role, and timestamp about a minute before the alarm.
  4. Reports the root cause as that priority inversion. Recommends removing the redundant drop rule and managing the rule group through infrastructure-as-code (IaC) to prevent manual misconfigurations.
  5. Presents this as a plan you review and apply, not an automatic change.

In the DevOps Agent Operator Web App view, the agent first restates the Alarm-2 trigger and confirms that a workload connectivity health check is failing because the firewall’s stateless rules are dropping egress (Figure 9).

Figure 9: Scenario 2 – The symptom

Figure 9: Scenario 2 – The symptom

Next, the agent identifies the root cause, using the rule-group state and CloudTrail to pinpoint the conflicting DROP/PASS rules, where the new DROP rule’s lower priority number makes it match first (Figure 10).

Figure 10: Scenario 2 – The root cause

Figure 10: Scenario 2 – The root cause

Finally, the agent presents a mitigation plan, recommending you remove the conflicting DROP rule at priority 200 to restore traffic flow (Figure 11).

Figure 11: Scenario 2 – The mitigation plan

Figure 11: Scenario 2 – The mitigation plan

Confirm recovery. Apply the change the agent recommends. After the allow rule is ahead of the drop rule again, Alarm-2 clears and the card returns to green. Move on to Scenario 3.

Scenario 3. Asymmetric cross Availability Zone routing drop

At baseline, the protected subnet in each Availability Zone routes its egress through the firewall endpoint in that same Availability Zone , and the matching return route uses that same endpoint. One endpoint sees both directions of the flow, so the stateful engine completes the handshake. The workload runs in the protected subnet in us-east-1a (CIDR 10.0.4.0/24), so at baseline its egress and its return both use the us-east-1a firewall endpoint.

Introduce the change. Make the flow asymmetric by sending egress out one Availability Zone endpoint while the return comes back through the other. This takes two route edits, and both are required. With only the first edit the flow can still complete, so the alarm will not trigger until both are saved. It makes no firewall-policy change, mirroring a real multi-Availability-Zone routing mistake.

To create asymmetric cross Availability Zone routing

  1. Go to the Amazon VPC console and choose Route tables in the navigation pane.
  2. Flip the egress. Select the NfNetworkStack/SampleVpc/protectedSubnet1 route table (the us-east-1a protected subnet, where the workload runs). On the Routes tab, choose Edit routes. Its 0.0.0.0/0 route currently targets the us-east-1a firewall endpoint. For the target, choose Gateway Load Balancer Endpoint and select the us-east-1b firewall endpoint, then choose Save changes.
  3. Move the return. Select the NfNetworkStack/SampleVpc/publicSubnet2 route table (the us-east-1b public subnet, where egress now exits). Choose Edit routes, then Add route. For the destination enter the workload CIDR 10.0.4.0/24. For the target, choose Gateway Load Balancer Endpoint and select the us-east-1a firewall endpoint. Choose Save changes.

After both edits, a flow’s egress leaves through the us-east-1b endpoint while its return is directed to the us-east-1a endpoint. Neither endpoint sees the whole flow.

Figure 12: Scenario 3 routing change breaking the flow’s symmetry

Figure 12: Scenario 3 routing change breaking the flow’s symmetry

What happens. A new connection leaves through one endpoint. Its return arrives at the other endpoint, which never saw the connection open, so the handshake fails. Unlike Scenarios 1 and 2, this affects the whole subnet, so all egress stops and Alarm-2 and Alarm-3 both move to ALARM. The AWS/NetworkFirewall DroppedPackets alarm (Alarm-1) stays quiet because no endpoint is making a drop decision. The flow is lost to asymmetric routing rather than counted as a firewall drop. This is why monitoring application connectivity matters. A routing fault is invisible to the firewall’s own drop counter. On the status page, the Scenario 2 card reads DROPPED (with the condition “Stateless rules dropping the monitored traffic class”) and the Scenario 3 card reads DROPPED (with the condition Return traffic dropped by asymmetric cross-Availability-Zone routing), while the Scenario 1 card stays Healthy (Figure 13). On the topology, the alarm pipeline from CloudWatch through Amazon SNS and Lambda to DevOps Agent and the workload-to-firewall inspect lines both turn amber, which the legend defines as collateral / alarm active, while the egress path from the firewall through the NAT gateway and the TLS :9142 and HTTPS · routing lines to the test endpoint turn red, which the legend defines as dropped (root cause).

Figure 13: Scenario 3 – The status page during a path-wide outage

Figure 13: Scenario 3 – The status page during a path-wide outage

Let DevOps Agent investigate. Both Alarm-2 and Alarm-3 fire in the same datapoint. DevOps Agent recognizes them as linked and merges them into a single investigation:

  1. Reads the flow logs and sees bidirectional TLS connections stop abruptly, with only one-way traffic remaining and no flows reaching the established state.
  2. Reads the firewall metrics and sees received and passed packets shift from one Availability Zone to the other at the moment of the change.
  3. Calls DescribeRouteTables and finds the egress route pointing at one Availability Zone firewall endpoint while the return route points at the other.
  4. Searches CloudTrail and surfaces the ReplaceRoute and CreateRoute calls by the same user, about a minute before both alarms fired.
  5. Reports the root cause as that asymmetric routing change. Recommends restoring symmetric same-Availability-Zone routing so egress and return traverse the same endpoint.
  6. Presents this as a plan you review and apply, not an automatic change.

A mitigation plan is a recommendation you review, not an automatic change, and the right fix depends on the intended design. Restoring symmetric routing can mean sending the workload subnet’s egress back through its own-Availability-Zone firewall endpoint (this sample’s architecture) or, in a design that doesn’t inspect this path, back through a NAT gateway. The agent infers a plausible target from what it can observe, so review the specific route it proposes against your intended topology before you apply it. (Connecting your pipeline or infrastructure-as-code, covered in the next section, lets the agent recommend the target that matches your design.)

In the DevOps Agent Operator Web App view, the agent restates the Alarm-3 (AsymmetricFlowFailures) trigger and confirms the workload’s egress to a monitored endpoint is being blocked by the Network Firewall (Figure 14).

Figure 14: Scenario 3 – The symptom

Figure 14: Scenario 3 – The symptom

Next, the agent identifies the root cause: manual route table changes that created cross-AZ asymmetric routing through the network firewall, breaking its symmetric routing requirement (Figure 15)

Figure 15: Scenario 3 – The root cause

Figure 15: Scenario 3 – The root cause

Finally, the agent presents a mitigation plan, recommending you restore symmetric routing by pointing protectedSubnet1‘s default route back to the same Availability Zone firewall endpoint, so one endpoint sees both directions of the flow again (Figure 16).

Figure 16: Scenario 3 – The mitigation plan

Figure 16: Scenario 3 – The mitigation plan

Confirm recovery. Apply the change the agent recommends, after checking the route target matches your intended design. After the workload subnet’s egress and return use the same Availability Zone firewall endpoint again, the control probe recovers, the alarms clear, and every card returns to green.

Further considerations

In production a single change can trigger several alarms at the same time, as Scenario 3 shows. DevOps Agent links related investigations and works them as one, so you review a single root cause. You can validate the linked findings or unlink an alarm to investigate it independently. If you would rather collapse alarms before they reach the agent, you can add correlation logic in the bridge Lambda function, buffering and grouping by firewall. You can also add email, Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS), or HTTP subscribers to the SNS topic, or add the webhook Lambda function to a topic you already run. DevOps Agent produces a mitigation plan but does not change your environment on its own.

You can also give the agent more to work with. DevOps Agent connects to source repositories and CI/CD pipelines, integrating with GitHub (including GitHub Enterprise Server and GitLab Self-Managed through a private connection). It can associate AWS resources with deployments of AWS CloudFormation, AWS CDK, Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR) images, and Terraform. With deployed configuration and recent deployment events in view, the agent correlates the disruption against the change that introduced it and recommends a fix matching your intended design. For this sample, that means recommending the workload subnet’s own Availability Zone firewall endpoint rather than a generic symmetric path.

DevOps Agent also supports proactive incident prevention. It analyzes patterns across past investigations and delivers recommendations to prevent similar issues from recurring, including governance recommendations that strengthen deployment processes and pipeline controls. For Network Firewall rule changes, this means the agent can recommend guardrails for your CI/CD pipeline based on the classes of misconfigurations it has already resolved. You can access these recommendations through the Improvements page in the DevOps Agent Operator Web App.

Clean up

Clean up the environment with one command.

bash scripts/destroy.sh

It reverts any active scenario, runs cdk destroy for all stacks, and sweeps for stragglers by the Project = nf-devops-agent tag. The main cost drivers are the two Network Firewall endpoints, the NAT gateways (one in the main VPC for each Availability Zone, one in the test-endpoint VPC), and the test endpoint’s load balancers. Each of these bills at an hourly rate for as long as it’s provisioned, whether or not traffic is flowing, so a stack left running continues to accrue charges around the clock even while idle. Running the scenarios and tearing the stack down the same day limits the cost to a few active hours rather than days of idle hourly charges.

Conclusion

In this post, we showed you how AWS DevOps Agent accelerates troubleshooting for three common network firewall connectivity issues. The first was a domain deny list. The second was a stateless priority inversion. The third was an asymmetric cross-AZ routing drop. For each one, DevOps Agent investigated the drop and returned a root cause with a mitigation plan you approve before applying. The first scenario triggered on a prebuilt Network Firewall metric, and the other two on application health metrics. That shows both ways to alarm on a firewall problem through one pipeline.

The pattern isn’t specific to Network Firewall. The same flow fits any service that emits CloudWatch metrics and logs, such as AWS WAF, security groups, and network ACLs. Clone the sample repository to explore the solution, then apply what you learn to your own firewall, application, and alarms. For more details, see the AWS Network Firewall Developer Guide and the AWS Network Firewall pricing page. Start with the Getting Started with AWS DevOps Agent guide to connect your first webhook.

Salman Ahmed

Salman is a Senior Technical Account Manager at AWS, specializing in helping customers design, implement, and optimize their AWS environments. He combines deep networking expertise with a passion for exploring emerging technologies to help organizations get the most out of their cloud investments. Outside of work, he enjoys photography, traveling, and watching his favorite sports teams.

How Mapfre USA modernized fraud claims with Amazon EMR Serverless

Post Syndicated from Lijan Kuniyil original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/how-mapfre-usa-modernized-fraud-claims-with-amazon-emr-serverless/

Insurance fraud remains a significant challenge for the insurance industry because fraudulent claims can increase loss costs, reduce trust, and consume investigation capacity that could otherwise be focused on serving customers. Traditional fraud detection approaches typically rely on rules-based controls, manual investigation triggers, historical claim patterns, and structured-data-only analysis. These approaches are useful for known fraud patterns, but they can struggle to detect sophisticated fraud rings or hidden relationships across claimants, policies, vehicles, providers, addresses, and prior suspicious activities.

Mapfre USA is the number one auto and home insurer in Massachusetts, serving customers in 11 states nationwide. Our coverage includes auto, home, motorcycle, watercraft, business insurance, and more. As part of Mapfre Group, we’re a worldwide leader serving over 31.1 million customers in more than 100 countries with a team of 31,000 employees. In collaboration with AWS and Neo4j, Mapfre USA modernized its fraud prevention capabilities by combining graph-based features with machine learning (ML) models deployed on AWS. This initiative, focused initially on Massachusetts Auto insurance and later expanded to Home (HO), has delivered significant business impact, exceeding $5 million Net Present Value (NPV), with realized savings already outperforming projections.

In this post, we share how Mapfre USA designed and implemented this solution, highlight the technical architecture running on AWS specifically on the Mapfre Data Platform called Atenea, and explore lessons learned that can apply to other industries facing complex fraud challenges.

Business challenge

Fraudulent claims aren’t always isolated events. They often involve hidden networks of policyholders, vehicles, providers, and prior suspicious activities. Detecting these complex relationships requires going beyond traditional structured data analysis.

Mapfre set out with a clear goal:

  • Goal: Improve fraud detection accuracy and claims handling efficiency.
  • Key KPI: Identify fraudulent claims missed by traditional methods.
  • Approach: Develop several ML models that use both traditional structured data and graph-based features derived from claim relationships.
  • Deployment: Integrate seamlessly with Guidewire Claims, so front-line adjusters automatically receive fraud alerts with explanations.

Each flagged claim exposure generates a Guidewire activity showing the top three model drivers, helping investigators understand why the claim was identified and act quickly.

Technical solution on AWS (Atenea Data Platform)

The fraud detection platform is built on a modern data architecture on AWS, designed to scale efficiently and provide long-term governance.

At its core, the solution uses Apache Iceberg tables stored on Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), with metadata managed through the AWS Glue Data Catalog and access governed through AWS Lake Formation as part of the Atenea lakehouse governance model. The platform feature store is implemented through feature-store-managed Iceberg tables that manage model features, predictions, and Guidewire activities. The implementation is structured across three logical layers:

  • Silver Layer – Iceberg tables that contain source data from each of the sources, used as the initial consumption point of the platform.
  • Gold Layer – Iceberg tables storing intermediate data, such as unified Guidewire activity logs, Auto features, and Home features.
  • Platinum Layer – Feature Store-managed Iceberg tables containing encoded features and model predictions, making them reusable across models and ensuring strong metadata governance.

Processing pipelines are executed on Amazon EMR Serverless, with orchestration managed by Apache Airflow operators running on Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow (Amazon MWAA). This provides elastic, cost-efficient compute for both batch processing and fast-time scoring, while keeping orchestration, monitoring, and recovery centralized.

For graph enrichment, the platform connects to Neo4j using a dedicated driver, enabling advanced network-based features like suspicious claim linkages, provider fraud ratios, and centrality metrics.

This architecture supports efficient, reliable, and transparent production execution through repeatable Airflow orchestration, environment-based continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) promotion, centralized monitoring, failure notifications, retry mechanisms, dead-letter queue handling for Guidewire integration, and controlled secret management. At the same time, the layered lakehouse design keeps the platform flexible enough to evolve with new business needs and fraud detection use cases.

Architecture diagram showing the Mapfre USA fraud detection platform on AWS, including data ingestion, graph enrichment, model scoring, and Guidewire integration

The data sources are policy, claims, vehicles, and notes (from AS400 and Guidewire), which include structured data and derived features capturing entity relationships (graph data).

The following list describes the architecture overview:

  1. Data ingestion – Claim batch data uploaded to Amazon S3. Data gets standardized and materialized in Iceberg tables within the Silver layer.
  2. Graph enrichment – Data processed to update Neo4j graph database hosted on AWS.
  3. Model training and scoring – Batch scoring for several ML models.
  4. Model orchestration – Unified orchestration for ingestion, training, and inference using Apache Airflow operators. CI/CD pipelines for promotion across environments.
  5. Execution platform – Amazon EMR Serverless for cost-efficient Spark processing. Migration to Apache Iceberg plus AWS Glue Data Catalog for scalable metadata handling.
  6. Integration with claims systems – Fraud predictions automatically create Guidewire activities, enriched with a description for investigators.
  7. Secrets and securityAWS Secrets Manager securely stores credentials and tokens for Guidewire API integration, with environment-specific and Region-specific access controls.
  8. Monitoring and reliabilityAmazon CloudWatch and Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) provide visibility into pipeline health and notify teams on failures. Data quality checks are executed at key stages of the pipeline to validate data availability, schema consistency, completeness, and business-rule expectations before outputs are consumed by models or sent to Guidewire.

Guidewire integration with MLOps on AWS

One of the most important parts of Mapfre’s solution was closing the loop between ML predictions and the claims handling system. This required a resilient integration between the Atenea data platform on AWS and Guidewire Claims.

The following describes the integration flow:

  1. When an ML use case finishes scoring, the results are written as JSON files into the S3 path: <bucket_name>/guidewire/.
  2. An S3 event notification triggers an AWS Lambda function.
  3. This Lambda function:
    • Reads the JSON file.
    • Calls the Guidewire Predictive Model API.
    • Because Guidewire doesn’t support batch requests, the Lambda function sends each JSON payload individually. This keeps the integration compatible with Guidewire and isolates failures at the individual activity level, but it increases the number of API calls and makes retry, throttling, DLQ handling, and monitoring controls important.
  4. If successful, the API responds with HTTP 201 (activity created).
    • If not, the Lambda function retries up to two times.
    • Failed requests are sent to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) dead-letter queue (DLQ), and an Amazon SNS notification is published for monitoring.
  5. Secrets are stored in AWS Secrets Manager and injected as Lambda environment variables, along with AWS Region-specific URLs for token retrieval and API endpoints.
  6. The following JSON shows the example structure for Guidewire integration:
{
  "method": "createPredictiveActivity",
  "params": [
    {
      "claimNumber": "AUXXXXXXX",
      "exposureNumber": 1,
      "subject": "Fraud alert from ML model",
      "description": "Claim flagged as potential fraud based on graph + ML features",
      "shortSubject": "ML_Fraud_Flag",
      "priority": "high",
      "availableForClosedClaim": true,
      "autoCloseOnExposureClosure": false,
      "targetDays": 4,
      "escalationDays": 6
    }
  ]
}

Diagram showing the Guidewire integration flow with AWS Lambda, Amazon SQS dead-letter queue, and AWS Secrets Manager

Key benefits of this integration:

  • Real-time actionability – Fraud predictions automatically create Guidewire activities for front-line adjusters.
  • Resilience – Built-in retries, DLQ handling, and Amazon SNS alerts make sure failed events aren’t lost.
  • Security – Secrets and tokens are managed using AWS Secrets Manager, with strict environment separation (dev, pre, pro).
  • Scalability – Any new MLOps use case writes results into the S3 output path, automatically flowing into Guidewire.

This integration shows that fraud models don’t exist in isolation but actively augment daily claim workflows in production. It connects Atenea’s MLOps pipelines on AWS directly with business decisioning systems, which is critical to realizing the fraud savings impact.

Data quality and resilience

For robustness, data quality checks are applied on ingestion pipelines and graph features. Automated validation detects anomalies early, monitoring dashboards track KPIs and model performance, and standardized recovery and promotion processes operate across environments.

Visualization and investigative tools

Neo4j Bloom supports SIU workflows by visually exploring entity relationships, such as a provider linked across multiple suspicious claims, accelerating fraud ring identification.

Conclusion

The fraud detection model in auto claims has enhanced Mapfre USA’s ability to identify fraudulent activity, driving significant savings and improving overall claims efficiency.

During the pilot phase alone, savings exceeded projections, and in production the initiative has proven a Net Present Value (NPV) of more than $5M. These results confirm the business case and highlight the strength of combining structured data with graph-based features to uncover fraud networks that traditional approaches miss.

The results have been compelling:

  • Accuracy gains – Detection improved by 50–135 percent compared to baseline methods.
  • Substantial realized value – Both during the pilot and in production.
  • Cross-functional success – The initiative brought together Claims, IT Data, Advanced Analytics, and Neo4j teams in an agile, collaborative model.

Beyond the financial outcomes, several lessons have emerged. First, cross-functional collaboration between groups like Claims, Data Engineering, Advanced Analytics, and technology partners like AWS and Neo4j was critical to success. Second, explainability proved essential. By presenting adjusters with the top model drivers directly in Guidewire, trust and adoption of the system increased substantially. Finally, building resilience into the architecture through monitoring, retries, and data quality processes helped the models operate reliably in production.

Looking ahead, the platform is well-positioned to expand beyond fraud detection. New use cases such as underwriting anomaly detection and customer entity resolution are already on the roadmap. With robust architecture built on AWS using Amazon EMR Serverless, Apache Iceberg on Amazon S3 supported by AWS Glue Data Catalog and Lake Formation, a custom-built Feature Store, and Neo4j, Mapfre now has a scalable foundation to continue driving innovation and business impact.

To learn more about Amazon EMR Serverless, see the Amazon EMR Serverless documentation.

How to use the AWS Workload Credentials Provider for cross-account secret retrieval and prefetching secrets

Post Syndicated from Derik Wang original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-use-the-aws-workload-credentials-provider-for-cross-account-secret-retrieval-and-prefetching-secrets/

If you manage secrets across multiple AWS accounts or need faster secret access for latency-sensitive applications, this post shows you how to meet those requirements using two new features of the AWS Workload Credentials Provider (provider). You will learn how to configure role chaining for cross-account secret retrieval and prefetching of secrets to reduce cold-start latency.

By using role chaining, you can access secrets across AWS accounts through a single provider instance by assuming AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles. Prefetching populates the provider’s in-memory cache with secrets at startup so your application can retrieve secrets without waiting for the first request to trigger a network call at runtime.

What is the AWS Workload Credentials Provider?

AWS Secrets Manager stores and rotates credentials, API keys, and other secrets. The AWS Workload Credentials Provider is a client-side HTTP service that retrieves and caches secrets locally. This reduces latency, improves availability during transient failures, and lowers costs. It supports post-quantum TLS by default, requires no language-specific SDK, and works across Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS), and AWS Lambda. For more details, see the Workload Credentials Provider documentation and GitHub repository.

Security considerations

The Server-Side Requst Forger (SSRF) token prevents unauthorized processes from accessing the provider’s HTTP endpoint. Only applications that can read the token file can retrieve secrets through the provider.

Any identity that can access the provider’s endpoint and SSRF token can retrieve secrets through role chaining. This means users with compute environment access can retrieve cross-account secrets when role assumption is configured. Scope the target role’s permissions to only the secrets required by following the principle of least privilege.

For prefetching, secrets are loaded into the provider’s in-memory cache at startup. Any process that can reach the provider’s localhost endpoint and provide a valid SSRF token can retrieve prefetched secrets from the cache.

Cross-account secret retrieval with role chaining

Organizations might store secrets in a dedicated AWS account, or need to share one secret across applications in different accounts. Until now, cross-account retrieval through the provider required attaching resource-based policies directly to each secret. Some customers prefer IAM role assumption. Before this feature, you had to deploy multiple provider instances with different credentials or build custom credential-switching logic. The provider now supports both approaches: resource-based policies and IAM role assumption. While role assumption is especially useful for cross-account scenarios, it also helps within the same account when secrets are protected by different customer-managed KMS keys.

When you include the roleArn query parameter in a request, the provider uses AWS Security Token Service (AWS STS) AssumeRole to obtain temporary credentials for the specified role and retrieves the secret with those credentials. The provider creates and caches a separate client for each role ARN, so subsequent requests to the same role reuse the existing client. Each role client maintains its own independent cache.

Note: The source account runs the Workload Credentials Provider and your application. The target account contains the secret you want to retrieve. A single provider instance in the source account can assume roles in one or more target accounts.

Prerequisites

  • A Workload Credentials Provider built and installed in your environment (see the README for build instructions)
  • AWS credentials configured in your compute environment with permission to call sts:AssumeRole on the target role ARN
    • If you also retrieve secrets from the source account through the provider, the credentials need secretsmanager:GetSecretValue and secretsmanager:DescribeSecret permissions for those secrets
  • A secret in a target AWS account that you want to retrieve
  • An IAM role in the target account with a trust policy that allows the provider’s identity to assume it

To build the Workload Credentials Provider

The provider is written in Rust and compiles to a single executable. The following steps are for an RPM-based system such as Amazon Linux 2023:

  1. Install build dependencies:
    sudo yum -y groupinstall "Development Tools"

  2. Install Rust:
    curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh
    source "$HOME/.cargo/env"

  3. Clone the repository and build the provider (use the latest tag available):
    git clone --branch <git tag> https://github.com/aws/aws-workload-credentials-provider.git
    cd aws-workload-credentials-provider
    cargo build --release

The compiled binary is at target/release/aws-workload-credentials-provider.

To install the Workload Credentials Provider on Amazon EC2

After building the provider, install it as a system service on your EC2 instance and configure access to the SSRF token.

  1. After configuring your config.toml file (see Configuration options section), run the install script to deploy the provider as a systemd service and generate the SSRF token:
    cd aws_workload_credentials_provider_common/configuration
    sudo ./install --config config.toml

  2. Add your application user to the aws-wcp-token group. This grants your application permission to read the SSRF token file, which is required for all secret retrieval requests:
    sudo usermod -aG aws-wcp-token <APP_USER>

To install on Amazon ECS, Amazon EKS, or Lambda, see the installation instructions in the GitHub repository.

To verify the installation

  1. Check that the provider is running:
    curl -v -H \
        "X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token: $(</var/run/awssmatoken)" \
        'http://localhost:2773/secretsmanager/get?secretId=<YOUR_SECRET_ID>'

  2. You’ll receive a JSON response with the secret value. If you see a connection refused error, check that the provider process is running. If you see a 401 or 403 error, verify the SSRF token file is readable and that the provider’s IAM credentials have secretsmanager:GetSecretValue and secretsmanager:DescribeSecret permissions.

Required permissions

The provider’s base IAM identity requires:

  • sts:AssumeRole on the target role ARN

The target role requires:

  • secretsmanager:GetSecretValue
  • secretsmanager:DescribeSecret

To configure the target account IAM role

Create an IAM role in the target account with a trust policy that allows the provider’s identity in the source account to assume it. Then attach a policy that grants access to the required secrets.

  1. Create an IAM role in the target account with a trust policy that allows the provider’s identity in the source account to assume it.
    {
        "Version": "2012-10-17",
        "Statement": [
            {
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Principal": {
                    "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::111111111111:role/WCProviderRole"
                },
                "Action": "sts:AssumeRole"
            }
        ]
    }
    

  2. Attach a policy to this role that grants access to the secret:
{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": [
                "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue",
                "secretsmanager:DescribeSecret"
            ],
            "Resource": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:222222222222:secret:MyDatabaseSecret"
        }
    ]
}

To configure the source account IAM role

Before the provider can assume the role you created in the target account, grant it permission to call sts:AssumeRole. Attach the following policy to the provider’s IAM role in the source account:

{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Action": "sts:AssumeRole",
            "Resource": "arn:aws:iam::222222222222:role/CrossAccountSecretAccessRole"
        }
    ]
}

To retrieve the cross-account secret

Call the Workload Credentials Provider endpoint with the roleArn parameter. The following curl example shows how to retrieve a secret using a different IAM role:

curl -v -H "X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token: $(</var/run/awssmatoken)" 'http://localhost:2773/secretsmanager/get?secretId=MyDatabaseSecret&roleArn=arn:aws:iam::222222222222:role/CrossAccountSecretAccessRole'

The following Python example shows the same operation:

import requests

def get_secret_cross_account():
    role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::222222222222:role/CrossAccountSecretAccessRole"
    url = f"http://localhost:2773/secretsmanager/get?secretId=MyDatabaseSecret&roleArn={role_arn}"

    with open('/var/run/awssmatoken') as fp:
        token = fp.read()

    headers = {
        "X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token": token.strip()
    }

    response = requests.get(url, headers=headers)

    if response.status_code == 200:
        return response.text
    else:
        raise Exception(f"Status code {response.status_code} - {response.text}")

You can configure the maximum number of simultaneous assumed roles with the max_roles option in the provider’s TOML configuration file. The default is 20, and the range is 1–20.

Prefetching secrets at startup

By default, the Workload Credentials Provider populates its cache lazily—the first request for a secret triggers a network call to Secrets Manager. Prefetching reduces this cold-start latency by loading secrets at startup.

How prefetching works

You can configure prefetching by adding a [capabilities.secrets_manager.prefetch] section to the provider’s TOML configuration file. You can specify secrets to prefetch in two ways:

  • Explicit secrets – List specific secret IDs or ARNs using [[capabilities.secrets_manager.prefetch.secrets]] entries.
  • Tag-based discovery – Discover secrets by tag key using [[capabilities.secrets_manager.prefetch.filter_tags]] entries. The provider calls BatchGetSecretValue with tag key filters to find and cache all matching secrets.

You can use both methods together. Each entry optionally accepts a role_arn field for cross-account prefetching through role chaining.

Required permissions

The following permissions are required on the IAM role that performs the prefetch, depending on whether the secrets are in the source account or a target account.

  • secretsmanager:BatchGetSecretValue – Required on the source account role for source-account secrets, or on the target role for cross-account secrets
  • secretsmanager:ListSecrets – Required when using tag-based discovery (filter_tags), on whichever role is performing the discovery

Configuration options

You can tune prefetch behavior with the following options in the [capabilities.secrets_manager.prefetch] section of your TOML configuration file:

  • cache_buffer_ratio – The maximum fraction of the cache to fill per caching client during prefetch, in the range 0.1–1.0. The default is 0.8. For example, if your cache holds 100 secrets, a ratio of 0.8 prefetches up to 80, leaving room for 20 on-demand secrets to be cached.
  • max_jitter_seconds – The maximum random delay in seconds before starting the prefetch task, in the range 0–10. The default is 0 (no jitter). Use this to prevent fleet-wide synchronized API calls when deploying across many instances.

Example: Prefetch with explicit secrets

The following configuration prefetches two secrets at startup, one from the source account and one from a different account using role chaining:

[capabilities.secrets_manager.prefetch]
secrets = [
    { secret_id = "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:111111111111:secret:MySecret-AbCdEf" },
    { secret_id = "cross-account-secret", role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::222222222222:role/CrossAccountSecretAccessRole" }
]

Example: Prefetch with tag-based discovery

The following configuration discovers and caches all secrets tagged with the Environment key, and all secrets tagged with the Team key in a different account:

[capabilities.secrets_manager.prefetch]
filter_tags = [
    { key = "Environment" },
    { key = "Team", role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::222222222222:role/CrossAccountSecretAccessRole" },
]

Example: Full configuration

The following example shows a complete provider configuration that combines both features:

[logging]
log_level = "info"

[capabilities.secrets_manager]
http_port = 2773
region = "us-east-1"

[capabilities.secrets_manager.cache]
ttl_seconds = 300

[capabilities.secrets_manager.prefetch]
cache_buffer_ratio = 0.6
max_jitter_seconds = 5
secrets = [
    { secret_id = "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:111111111111:secret:MySecret-AbCdEf" },
    { secret_id = "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:222222222222:secret:CrossAccount-AbCdEf", role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::222222222222:role/CrossAccountSecretAccessRole" },
]
filter_tags = [
    { key = "Environment" },
    { key = "Team", role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::222222222222:role/CrossAccountSecretAccessRole" },
]

Start the provider with your configuration file:

./aws-workload-credentials-provider sm start --config config.toml

Conclusion

This post showed you how to use role chaining for cross-account secret retrieval and prefetching to reduce cold-start latency. Role chaining simplifies multi-account architectures—a single provider instance can retrieve secrets across accounts using IAM role assumption. Prefetching reduces cold-start latency by populating the provider’s cache before your application makes its first request. Combined, these features let you run the Workload Credentials Provider across multiple accounts with faster secret access.

Further reading

Submit feedback in the comments below, or contact AWS Support with questions.


Derik Wang

Derik Wang

Derik is a Software Engineer on the AWS Secrets Manager team.

Paras Dhawan

Paras Dhawan

Paras is a Software Development Manager for AWS Secrets Manager, based in Seattle. Paras joined AWS in 2017 and has spent his career across AWS Identity, AWS Cryptography, and Credentials Distribution Systems. He is passionate to innovate, solve and simplify customer problems related to security, access, authorization and beyond.

Automating contract intelligence with Doczy.ai™ on AWS

Post Syndicated from Sanket Nasre original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/automating-contract-intelligence-with-doczy-ai-on-aws/

Extracting actionable insights from thousands of contracts and legal documents remains a challenge. For organizations, critical business information is locked in unstructured documents such as contracts, legal agreements, provider arrangements, and vendor invoices. Extracting and operationalizing this information has traditionally been a manual, error-prone, and resource-intensive process. This leads to missed savings opportunities, costly delays, and significant inefficiencies across the enterprise.

AArete, a global management and technology consulting firm specializing in healthcare, recognized this challenge and developed Doczy.ai™, an intelligent contract interpretation solution powered by generative AI on Amazon Web Services (AWS).

In this post, we show you how Doczy.ai™ uses generative AI on AWS to automate contract intelligence at scale, transforming unstructured documents into structured, actionable insights, so organizations can automate critical business processes and unlock the full value of their data.

The challenge: Data trapped in documents

For healthcare organizations, managing and interpreting contracts and documents represents a major operational bottleneck. Manual review processes require deploying teams to extract data from thousands of documents. This is an approach that is neither scalable nor sustainable, highly prone to error, and costly. Organizations relying on institutional knowledge face additional risks: critical information resides with a few key individuals, creating knowledge silos and succession planning challenges. Existing Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) systems often prove inadequate for capturing the nuanced and complex terms unique to each agreement. These legacy systems can only configure predefined fields, missing the rich detail and contextual information that distinguishes contracts. The downstream impact is substantial: in healthcare, reimbursement terms must be manually translated into claims systems—a slow, error-prone process. Similarly, verifying vendor invoices against contract terms often requires manual effort, leading to payment processing delays and missed contractual savings opportunities. These inefficiencies ultimately leave significant value on the table.

This is where Doczy.ai™ provides significant value.

Doczy.ai™: An intelligent contract interpretation solution

Doczy.ai™ directly addresses these challenges using advanced AI and scalability on AWS. Developed by AArete, Doczy.ai™ pushes the boundaries of document intelligence. The solution automatically interprets complex documents and converts them into a structured, queryable information repository that allows organizations to unlock the full value of their data and drive smarter decisions.The evolution of Doczy.ai™ reflects rapid AI advancement. Prior to 2020, document processing required manual effort, with individuals processing approximately 100 documents per week. Between 2020–2023, the firm implemented rules-based contract processing, achieving approximately 55% accuracy. The breakthrough came in 2024 with an AI-based processing built on AWS achieved 99% accuracy—a dramatic improvement over the 55% accuracy of traditional rules-based systems.

Doczy.ai™ architecture

Doczy.ai™ is built on a comprehensive AWS architecture designed to handle the entire document processing lifecycle: from the moment a file enters the system to the moment it generates actionable business intelligence.

Doczy.ai is built on a comprehensive AWS architecture designed to handle the entire document processing lifecycle: from the moment a file enters the system to the moment it generates actionable business intelligence.

Architecture of Doczy.ai™

External users access the platform through a secure Next.js frontend, with Amazon Cognito managing authentication and authorization behind the scenes. After authentication, users upload documents directly to Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), where durable, scalable object storage ensures nothing is lost and everything is accessible at scale. From there, the real intelligence begins.

An AWS Lambda function triggers Amazon Textract to extract text and metadata from documents in various formats. What sets Doczy.ai™ apart at this stage is its patented “smart chunking” algorithm, a proprietary approach that goes far beyond pulling words off a page. Rather than treating a document as a flat sequence of text, smart chunking preserves hierarchical structure and one-to-many relationships within documents. It uses a combination of semantic and keyword search to decompose text into meaningful, context-aware chunks, applying dynamic parameters to maintain logical relationships throughout. Sequential identifiers and metadata-driven grouping organize these chunks into field groups, detecting overlaps and removing duplications while keeping the document’s natural flow intact.

After chunking, the document enters the dual clustering engine of Doczy.ai™. This two-lens methodology analyzes every contract simultaneously from both a semantic and a structural perspective. On the semantic side, extracted text is converted into embeddings, numerical representations of meaning, and similar ideas are grouped together even when they’re expressed in different words. On the structural side, pattern-recognition algorithms identify clause types, formatting conventions, table layouts, and hierarchical organization, understanding. For example, that a three-nested-level exhibit carries fundamentally different implications than a straightforward attached schedule.These two analyses don’t operate in isolation. Projection algorithms compare the semantic and structural clusters side by side, synthesizing them into a unified, enriched document model that captures both meaning and context. It’s this convergence that drives the 99% accuracy rate of Doczy.ai™. The system doesn’t just read the words, it understands the contract. Advanced large language models (LLMs) then generate structured output grounded in this dual-clustered intelligence.Before output is finalized, the system determines each document’s file class and generates prompts tailored to the extracted text, cluster classification, and domain context. Through few-shot and multi-shot prompting, the platform continuously edits the prompt on domain-specific examples and based on real outputs, creating a feedback loop that compounds accuracy improvements over time.

The resulting structured data flows into Snowflake, forming a centralized repository that powers intelligent dashboards with actionable insights and visualizations. Throughout the entire pipeline, Amazon CloudWatch monitors performance in real time and proactively surfaces issues before they escalate, while AWS Secrets Manager safeguards sensitive information, ensuring that security is not an afterthought, but a foundational layer woven into every stage of the system.

The transformative impact of Doczy.ai™

The results of this AI-powered approach are transformative and measurable. By automating contract interpretation and document processing, Doczy.ai™ has demonstrated significant impact at scale for multiple organizations across healthcare and financial services. The scale of operations over the last 22 months demonstrates the maturity and production readiness of Doczy.ai™. This solution has processed 2.5 million contract documents (50 million pages) with 137 million API calls to Amazon Bedrock and 442 billion tokens—a level of automation and accuracy previously unattainable through manual or traditional document processing approaches. Over this same period, Doczy.ai™ has helped clients achieve approximately 330 million dollars in cumulative direct and indirect savings.The 99% accuracy rate represents significant improvement over the approximately 55% accuracy of rules-based systems and far exceeds manual processing, which is typically affected by fatigue and human error. The 97% reduction in manual processing time translates directly to cost savings and enables organizations to reallocate human resources to higher-value activities that require judgment and strategic thinking.

A use case in action: Business process automation for health plans

For health plans, Doczy.ai™ provides a powerful solution to automate and improve contract management across the entire lifecycle. It ingests existing contracts in both paper and digital formats, integrates with contract management systems such as Coupa and Icertis, and processes new contracts and amendments as they’re executed. It then creates a centralized metadata repository that feeds directly into downstream systems, enabling end-to-end business process automation.This automation unlocks critical capabilities: Organizations can continuously analyze and improve contract terms, identifying opportunities to improve financial performance and operational efficiency. The architecture feeds accurate, up-to-date contract data directly into claims systems, automating the configuration process that previously required manual translation of reimbursement terms and removing manual data entry, configuration errors, and delays. Additionally, the platform helps maintain claim payment accuracy by assessing payments against contract terms, identifying discrepancies, and flagging potential overpayments or underpayments before they occur.By automating manual processes, health plans can adapt quickly to new contract terms and regulatory requirements. The intelligent dashboards and actionable insights provided by Doczy.ai™ enable decision-makers to understand contract performance, identify trends, and take proactive action to optimize financial outcomes.

Getting started with Doczy.ai™

Organizations interested in using Doczy.ai™ to transform document processing and contract management can engage with AArete to discuss their specific use cases and requirements. AArete offers the platform as a Software as a Service (SaaS) solution, enabling rapid deployment without significant infrastructure investment. AArete’s team of experts will configure this solution for your specific document types, domain terminology, and business processes, supporting maximum value from day one.

Conclusion

The challenge of unlocking data from unstructured documents is a major hurdle for many businesses, particularly in healthcare and financial services where contracts and agreements govern critical operational and financial relationships. By embracing intelligent document intelligence on AWS, organizations can solve this long-standing operational challenge and unlock a new frontier of strategic advantage, turning their data into their most valuable asset.

Built on a sophisticated architecture that orchestrates Amazon Cognito, Amazon S3, AWS Lambda, Amazon Textract, Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), Amazon Bedrock, Amazon CloudWatch, and AWS Secrets Manager, Doczy.ai™ demonstrates how modern cloud services can solve complex document-heavy business problems. Its advanced hybrid smart chunking, dual clustering, and prompt optimization techniques form the core of a patented contract intelligence engine.

Doczy.ai™ delivers tangible impact, processing up to 250,000 contract documents per week with 99% accuracy, reducing manual processing time by 97%, and helping clients unlock roughly 330 million dollars in cumulative savings over 22 months. By embracing this intelligent document processing, organizations can turn contracts into a strategic data asset, improving efficiency, accuracy, and profitability while freeing teams to focus on higher-value work.

To learn more about how AArete and Doczy.ai™ can help your organization transform document processing and unlock the value of your unstructured data, visit the AArete website.


About the authors

AWS Weekly Roundup: AWS Local Zones in Istanbul, open-source ExtendDB, Kiro Web, and more (May 25, 2026)

Post Syndicated from Daniel Abib original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/aws-weekly-roundup-aws-local-zones-in-istanbul-open-source-extenddb-kiro-web-and-more-may-25-2026/

There’s something genuinely energizing about working with startups — something I’ve been doing intensely for more than two years now. Startups operate at a different frequency: the urgency is real, the constraints are tight, and the stakes are personal. Helping them navigate the challenge of proving their business model requires not just technical depth but a willingness to move fast, challenge assumptions, and make bets on the right architecture before the perfect data exists.

What I love most is that the work is never abstract: every decision I help a startup make has a direct impact on whether they ship on time, stay within budget, and earn the next round of confidence from their investors.

Let’s dive into this week’s AWS news.

Headlines
Now Open — AWS Local Zones in Istanbul, Türkiye — AWS has opened a new Local Zone in Istanbul, Türkiye, bringing AWS compute, storage, and networking services to one of Europe’s largest metropolitan areas. For organizations with data residency requirements in Türkiye, this Local Zone enables you to keep data within the country while still leveraging the full breadth of AWS services. The Local Zone also benefits applications that require single-digit millisecond latency — such as real-time gaming, media production, live video streaming, and financial services — by running closer to where end users actually are.

A Local Zone is a significant infrastructure investment: it requires the same level of commitment as a Region in terms of hardware, power, networking, and operational excellence. It also reflects AWS’s continued expansion into underserved markets.

For builders in Türkiye, this opens up a new set of architectural possibilities. You can now store and back up data within Turkish borders to help meet data residency requirements, and run latency-sensitive workloads in the Istanbul Local Zone while connecting seamlessly to the AWS Region — giving you the flexibility to architect hybrid applications without managing your own data center infrastructure. To learn more about our decade-long commitment, available services, customers and partners in Türkiye, visit the launch blog post.

Last week’s launches
Here are some launches and updates that caught my attention:

  • Security Hub Extended expands to 21 curated partner solutions across 9 categories — AWS Security Hub Extended now integrates with 21 curated partner security solutions spanning 9 categories, including endpoint protection, cloud security posture management, threat intelligence, and more. You can now get consolidated, prioritized security findings from a broader ecosystem of tools directly within Security Hub, without requiring custom integrations. This is particularly valuable for enterprise security teams that want a unified view of their security posture across AWS and third-party tooling.
  • Amazon SageMaker AI now supports OpenAI-compatible APIs for inference endpoints — You can now call Amazon SageMaker AI inference endpoints using OpenAI-compatible APIs, making it significantly easier to migrate AI workloads from OpenAI to SageMaker — or to build applications that work across multiple providers — with no SDK changes required. This lowers the migration barrier for teams that started prototyping with OpenAI and are now looking to move to a more scalable, cost-controlled infrastructure on AWS. Your existing application code works as-is; you simply point it at your SageMaker endpoint.
  • Introducing pre-fetching and IAM role assumption for AWS Secrets Manager Agent — The AWS Secrets Manager Agent can now pre-fetch secrets at startup and assume IAM roles to retrieve them, eliminating the cold-start latency associated with on-demand secret retrieval in latency-sensitive applications. You can configure the agent to preload the secrets your application needs before it starts serving traffic, reducing the risk of secrets-related latency spikes in production. IAM role assumption support also makes it easier to share the agent across workloads with different permission boundaries.
  • AWS announces ExtendDB, an open-source DynamoDB-compatible adapter — AWS has open-sourced ExtendDB, a DynamoDB-compatible adapter that allows you to use the DynamoDB API and data model on top of alternative backend storage systems. This is particularly useful for local development and testing workflows — you can write against the DynamoDB API without requiring a live AWS connection. It’s also valuable for scenarios where you need DynamoDB-compatible semantics with more control over the underlying storage layer. It’s a practical tool for teams that want to build portability into their data access layer.
  • AWS SAM CLI adds AWS CloudFormation Language Extensions support to accelerate local serverless development — The AWS SAM CLI now supports AWS CloudFormation Language Extensions locally, meaning you can use transforms, dynamic references, and other CloudFormation language features directly in your local development and testing workflows. This closes a long-standing gap between what you can test locally and what runs in production, making local serverless development faster and more reliable. If you build serverless applications with SAM and encounter edge cases in local testing, this update will meaningfully improve your experience.

For a full list of AWS announcements, be sure to keep an eye on the What’s New with AWS page.

Other AWS news
Here are some additional posts and resources that you might find interesting:

  • Amazon Bedrock introduces new advanced prompt optimization and migration tool — This post covers the newly launched Advanced Prompt Optimization and Migration Tool in Amazon Bedrock, which helps you automatically tune your prompts for better model performance and assists you in migrating prompts across different foundation models. It’s a must-read if you’re iterating on prompt quality for production AI workloads.
  • Introducing Kiro Web — Kiro, AWS’s AI-powered development environment, now has a web-based interface. Kiro Web lets you access Kiro’s spec-driven development, AI chat, and agent capabilities directly from your browser, without needing to install the desktop IDE. This is a great step toward making AI-assisted development more accessible — whether you’re doing a quick review, prototyping from a new machine, or introducing your team to the Kiro workflow.
  • Announcing updated retry behavior for AWS SDKs and Tools — AWS has updated the default retry behavior across its SDKs and CLI tools, improving resilience for transient errors without requiring configuration changes from developers. The updated behavior includes smarter backoff strategies and better handling of throttling responses. If you’re running production workloads that occasionally hit API rate limits or transient failures, this update improves reliability out of the box. It’s worth reading to understand what changed and how it affects your applications.
  • Bitnami image removal from ECR Public — AWS has announced that Bitnami container images will be removed from Amazon ECR Public. If your workloads pull Bitnami images from ECR Public, you should review this post to understand the timeline and migration path. The Bitnami images remain available directly from Bitnami’s own registry, and this post explains how to update your image references to continue pulling them without interruption.

Upcoming AWS events
Check your calendar and sign up for these events:

  • AWS Summit Amsterdam — Join us in Amsterdam on May 27 for a full day of cloud and AI sessions, hands-on labs, and networking with builders and AWS experts from across Europe. Registration is free.
  • AWS Summit Bangkok — AWS Summit Bangkok takes place on May 28. It’s a fantastic opportunity for builders and customers across Southeast Asia to connect and explore the latest in cloud innovation.
  • AWS Summit Milan — Also on May 28, AWS Summit Milan brings the AWS community together in Italy. If you’re in Southern Europe, this is your event.
  • AWS Summit Mumbai — Also on May 28, AWS Summit Mumbai brings cloud and AI content to builders across India. Check the link for the full agenda and registration.
  • AWS Summit Los Angeles — Mark your calendar for June 10 in Los Angeles. The AWS Summit LA is coming up and it’s a great opportunity to connect with the West Coast builder community.
  • AWS Community Days — Community-led conferences where content is planned, sourced, and delivered by community leaders. If you’re in Latin America, don’t miss AWS Community Day Belo Horizonte on August 22 — registration is open at awscommunityday.com.br.

Join the AWS Builder Center to connect with builders, share solutions, and access content that supports your development. Browse here for upcoming AWS-led in-person and virtual events and developer-focused events.

That’s all for this week. Check back next Monday for another Weekly Roundup!

— Daniel Abib

This post is part of our Weekly Roundup series. Check back each week for a quick roundup of interesting news and announcements from AWS!

Security posture improvement in the AI era

Post Syndicated from Celeste Bishop original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/security-posture-improvement-in-the-ai-era/

It’s only been a few weeks since Anthropic announced the Claude Mythos Preview model and launched Project Glasswing with AWS and other leading organizations. This has generated a lot of discussion about the future of cybersecurity and what the ever-increasing capabilities of foundation models mean to organizations.

As AWS CISO Amy Herzog pointed out in the Project Glasswing announcement, “At AWS, we build defenses before threats emerge, from our custom silicon up through the technology stack. Security isn’t a phase for us; it’s continuous and embedded in everything we do.”

Read more from Amy about this in Building AI defenses at scale: Before the threats emerge.

While the discussion around the future of cybersecurity is important, the only thing we know for certain is that organizations need to be able to react quickly to the rapid changes AI is bringing to technology and business in general. And you can’t react quickly if your security fundamentals aren’t dialed in.

The security hygiene gap

It’s easy to assume you have the foundational security elements covered, or to overlook some completely. Basic security use cases like identity management, threat detection, vulnerability management, data protection, and network security can be inconsistently implemented across cloud environments. While AI is reshaping the security landscape, strong security fundamentals continue to be essential for every organization, regardless of size or industry.

These are the security basics that matter whether or not you’re adopting AI: patching consistently, enforcing least-privilege access, enabling logging and monitoring, encrypting data at rest and in transit, and reviewing security configurations regularly. When these fundamentals are in place, you’re better positioned to take advantage of AI-driven tools and respond to newly discovered vulnerabilities, wherever they come from.

While the concepts that drive security fundamentals are universal, implementing them in your environment is best done with an understanding of the context unique to your organization. That’s why we have a multitude of freely available materials—like the AWS Well-Architected Framework—that you can use to help ask the right questions and implement changes in your environment. We also offer programs like the Security Health Improvement Program (SHIP) to help you improve your security posture through prescriptive guidance and continuous improvement.

What is the Security Health Improvement Program (SHIP)?

SHIP is a no-cost program available to every AWS customer, regardless of support tier. SHIP provides a proven, data-driven methodology to:

  • Assess your current security posture using data from your AWS environment
  • Identify specific opportunities to improve across 10 core security use cases
  • Build a prioritized action plan tailored to your environment
  • Establish a mechanism for continuous security improvement

The program is led by AWS Solutions Architects and Technical Account Managers who take you through a personalized report, contextualize findings for your environment, and help you build a prioritized action plan.

Why SHIP matters in the AI era

Project Glasswing highlights an important shift: AI-powered tools are accelerating the pace of vulnerability discovery, which means organizations need to be prepared to assess and respond to findings and changing situations faster than before. In addition to external factors, as organizations adopt AI—whether deploying foundation models, building agentic workflows, or using AI-powered services—how they implement their security controls must change as well. A strong security foundation is what makes confident AI adoption possible.

Here’s how SHIP helps:

Address foundational security gaps proactively

SHIP uses a data-driven methodology to identify opportunities to improve and optimize across 10 core security use cases: threat detection, cloud security posture management, application security testing, configuration management, access governance, vulnerability management, application protection, network security, encryption, and secrets management. The program includes a SHIP assessment to identify critical security findings related to your current security posture, so your team can build a prioritized roadmap for improvement tailored to your environment.

Establish the security baseline AI workloads require

Before you deploy your first model on Amazon Bedrock or build agentic workflows with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, you need confidence that your underlying infrastructure follows security best practices. SHIP uses actual data from your environment to provide prescriptive, specific guidance rather than generic security recommendations. This is especially relevant as AI-driven vulnerability discovery tools become more widely available: organizations with strong baselines will be able to act on new findings quickly and effectively.

Build a mechanism for continuous security improvement

As AI capabilities evolve, organizations benefit from having a repeatable process to assess and strengthen their security posture over time. SHIP establishes the methodology and mechanisms for your team to continuously assess, prioritize, and improve. By building this operational capability, you’re strengthening your organization’s ability to adapt and contributing to broader industry resilience. As the cybersecurity community integrates AI into defense strategies, SHIP helps you maintain foundational best practices so you can adopt these innovations effectively and with confidence.

Getting started is straightforward

SHIP is available today, at no cost, to every AWS customer. Here’s how to get started:

  1. Talk to your AWS account team. Ask about scheduling a SHIP engagement, or request one directly on the SHIP page.
  2. Attend a SHIP Activation Day. AWS regularly hosts hands-on workshops where you can run the SHIP assessment with AWS Solutions Architects and start building your improvement plan.
  3. Explore the prescriptive guidance. Consult the AWS Well-Architected Framework – Security Lens for documentation, reference architectures, and implementation guides you can start using today.

Take the next step together

AWS is committed to being the most secure cloud, from our participation in Project Glasswing to the security embedded in every layer of our infrastructure. Security is a shared responsibility, and programs like SHIP give customers the tools, guidance, and support to strengthen their security foundations so they can build confidently, no matter what comes next.

Ready to improve your security posture? Contact your AWS account team to schedule a SHIP engagement, or visit the SHIP resources page to learn more.

Celeste Bishop

Celeste Bishop

Celeste is a Senior Security Specialist at AWS, based in Austin, Texas. Over the past five years, she has held a range of security-focused roles spanning field and product marketing, developer relations, and executive engagement. She partners closely with customers, security leaders, and field teams to help organizations operate securely in the cloud. Celeste holds a Bachelor’s in Economics from the University of Texas at Austin.

Protecting your secrets from tomorrow’s quantum risks

Post Syndicated from Stéphanie Mbappe original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/protecting-your-secrets-from-tomorrows-quantum-risks/

As outlined in the AWS post-quantum cryptography (PQC) migration plan, addressing the risk of harvest now, decrypt later (HNDL) attack is an important part of your post-quantum plan. Upgrading the client-side of your workloads to support quantum-resistant confidentiality is an important aspect of your side of the PQC shared responsibility model. Timelines to plan and execute your PQC upgrades vary by region and by industry and will depend on your own business risk profile. To learn more, see the AWS PQC frequently asked questions.

AWS Secrets Manager uses SSL/TLS to communicate with AWS resources, currently supporting TLS 1.2 and 1.3 in all AWS Regions. The service supports using TLS 1.3 with hybrid post-quantum key exchange for clients that support this capability. The hybrid post-quantum approach establishes TLS connections by combining traditional cryptography (such as X25519) with post-quantum algorithms (ML-KEM), and helps to protect your secrets against both current classical attacks and future quantum computer threats. Regardless of how your workload accesses Secrets Manager, this client-side software upgrade is the only action you need to take to address risk to secrets from HNDL. Your secrets at rest are already encrypted using keys managed by AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS). Properly implemented symmetric encryption is considered quantum-resistant; asymmetric cryptography faces quantum threats. To learn more, watch AWS re:Inforce 2025 – Post-Quantum Cryptography Demystified.

To reduce builder effort for client-side upgrades, we’re pleased to announce the following Secrets Manager clients now enable and prefer post-quantum TLS when initiating connections to Secrets Manager: Secrets Manager Agent (v2.0.0 or later), the AWS Lambda extension (v19 or later) and the Secrets Manager CSI Driver (v2.0.0 or later). For SDK-based clients, hybrid post-quantum key exchange is available in supported AWS SDKs. Enablement requirements vary by language, version, and operating system. See the following table for your SDK client.

This launch is part of the ongoing commitment AWS has made to migrate systems to post-quantum cryptography and making it straightforward for our customers to do the same. See Post-Quantum Cryptography to learn more.

Client hybrid post-quantum key exchange requirements

The following table summarizes the behavior for each client. When the client is upgraded to support hybrid post-quantum key exchange, the Secrets Manager service endpoint automatically selects it during the TLS handshake. Upgrading to the versions listed in the table is the only action you need to take for your workload to begin using hybrid post-quantum key exchange when calling Secrets Manager APIs.

Client Requirements
Secrets Manager Agent Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS preferred by default (v2.0.0 and later)
AWS Lambda extension Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS preferred by default (Version 19 and later)
Secrets Manager CSI Driver Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS preferred by default (v2.0.0 and later)
AWS SDK for Rust Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS preferred by default (releases after August 29, 2025)
AWS SDK for Go Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS preferred by default (Go v1.24 and later)
AWS SDK for Node.js Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS preferred by default (Node.js v22.20 and v24.9.0 and later)
AWS SDK for Kotlin Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS preferred by default on Linux (v1.5.78 and later)
AWS SDK for Python The AWS SDK for Python (boto3) uses the OS-provided OpenSSL for TLS.
Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS requires running on a system with OpenSSL 3.5 or later installed.
AWS SDK for Java v2 AWS SDK for Java v2 requires an AWS CRT HTTP client that supports PQ TLS when configured using postQuantumTlsEnabled.
Secrets Manager caching clients The Secrets Manager caching libraries are built on the AWS SDKs and inherit their TLS behavior. Note for Java: The JDBC driver flag and Java Caching flag must be set to enable Hybrid PQ key exchange in TLS.

If you’re using the Secrets Manager Agent, the Lambda extension, or the CSI Driver, upgrade to the listed version to use hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS as the default. Customers using the AWS SDK for Rust, Go, or Node.js at the versions listed in the table are already upgraded and no additional action is required. The SDK will select the hybrid post-quantum key exchange for API calls. For customers using the AWS SDK for Python, hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS requires OpenSSL 3.5 or later to be present on the host system. Guidance on verifying and enabling this is available in the AWS Secrets Manager documentation. For customers using the AWS SDK for Java v2, hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS requires using the AWS CRT HTTP client. The postQuantumTlsEnabled(true) must be set on the CRT client to enable hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS.

After your client versions meet the requirements listed in the table, you can verify that your connections are actively using hybrid post-quantum key exchange.

How to verify your connection uses hybrid post-quantum key exchange

With hybrid post-quantum key exchange using ML-KEM now enabled by default for Secrets Manager clients (see the preceding table), most customers will not need ongoing monitoring to verify correct behavior or detect regressions. However, security teams and compliance officers might want to confirm that their Secrets Manager API calls are negotiating the hybrid key exchange. On the server side, you can confirm hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS by using AWS CloudTrail. On the client side, you can inspect TLS handshake details using a utility like Wireshark or by using developer tools built into major web browsers.

Verification is a two-step process: first, fetch a secret using your Secrets Manager client to generate a GetSecretValue API call, then confirm in AWS CloudTrail that the call negotiated hybrid post-quantum key exchange.

Fetch your secret using your Secrets Manager client

The following examples show how to retrieve your secret using the Secrets Manager Agent, Lambda extension, and CSI Driver—each of which will automatically negotiate hybrid post-quantum key exchange when calling the GetSecretValue API.

To verify hybrid post-quantum TLS with Secrets Manager Agent on EC2 instance:
Install the agent on your Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance and use it as a client to fetch your secret.

  1. Follow the instructions for AWS Secrets Manager Agent.
  2. Ensure that your EC2 instance profile has the permission for secretsmanager:GetSecretValue to fetch the secret.
  3. Connect to your private EC2 instance.
  4. Install the agent on your EC2 instance.
  5. Use the agent to fetch your secret.
    curl -H “X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token: $(</tmp/awssmatoken)” localhost:2773/secretsmanager/get?secretId=<YOUR-SECRET-ARN>
  6. Wait for about 5 minutes for CloudTrail to deliver the logs.
  7. Go to the CloudTrail event history and search for the event GetSecretValue.

To verify hybrid post-quantum TLS with Lambda extension:
Use the AWS parameters and Secrets Manager Lambda extension to create a Lambda function that will consume your secrets from Secrets Manager using direct API calls.

  1. Follow Using the AWS parameters and secrets Lambda extension to create the Lambda layer and the Lambda function.
  2. Select the latest extension version.
  3. Wait for about 5 minutes for CloudTrail to deliver the logs.
  4. Go to the CloudTrail event history and search for the event GetSecretValue.

To verify hybrid post-quantum TLS with CSI driver on Amazon EKS:
On your Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) cluster, use the AWS Secrets Store CSI Driver provider to fetch secrets from Secrets Manager in Kubernetes pods:

  1. Confirm the installed add-on version is 2.0.0 or later.
    eksctl get addon --cluster <CLUSTER-NAME> --name aws-secrets-store-csi-driver-provider
  2. Trigger a secret retrieval by restarting a pod that mounts a secret, or deploying a new one.
  3. Wait for about 5 minutes for CloudTrail to deliver the logs.
  4. Go to the CloudTrail event history and search for the event GetSecretValue.

Confirm hybrid post-quantum key exchange using CloudTrail

CloudTrail logs include a tlsDetails field for Secrets Manager API calls. When hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS is active, the keyExchange field in tlsDetails will show X25519MLKEM768. Each CloudTrail record includes a tlsDetails field that contains the cipher suite and, where available, the key exchange group negotiated during the TLS handshake.

You can work with CloudTrail event history using the AWS Management Console for CloudTrail or the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI).

To look up CloudTrail events using the console:

  1. Verify you are in the correct AWS Region.
  2. Open the CloudTrail console and select Event History.
  3. Under Lookup attributes filter, select Event name and GetSecretValue.
    Figure 1: Search CloudTrail event history by event name

    Figure 1: Search CloudTrail event history by event name

  4. Select your event.
    Figure 2: Select the event

    Figure 2: Select the event

  5. View the output in the Event Record section of the page.
    Figure 3: CloudTrail - GetSecretValue event

    Figure 3: CloudTrail – GetSecretValue event

To look up CloudTrail events using AWS CLI :
Using AWS CLI, select the last events and look at the output.

aws cloudtrail lookup-events \
--lookup-attributes AttributeKey=EventName,AttributeValue=GetSecretValue \
--max-results 5 \
--region <YOUR-REGION> \
--query 'Events[0].CloudTrailEvent' \
--output text

Example of CloudTrail Event for GetSecretValue API call:

In the following example, the userAgent field reflects what it used as a client to connect to Secrets Manager.

Note: The userAgent value depends on the client you use.

{
    "eventVersion": "1.11",
    "userIdentity": {
        "type": "AssumedRole",
        "principalId": "AROA123456789EXAMPLE:i-0c1a23fc456b7ab89",
        "arn": "arn:aws:sts::111122223333:assumed-role/YOUR-EC2-INSTANCE-PROFILE/i-0c1a23fc456b7ab89",
        "accountId": "111122223333",
        "accessKeyId": "ASIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE",
        "sessionContext": {
            "sessionIssuer": {
                "type": "Role",
                "principalId": "AROA123456789EXAMPLE",
                "arn": "arn:aws:iam::111122223333:role/YOUR-EC2-INSTANCE-PROFILE",
                "accountId": "111122223333",
                "userName": "YOUR-EC2-INSTANCE-PROFILE"
            },
            "attributes": {
                "creationDate": "2026-03-27T17:08:37Z",
                "mfaAuthenticated": "false"
            },
            "ec2RoleDelivery": "2.0"
        },
        "inScopeOf": {
            "issuerType": "AWS::EC2::Instance",
            "credentialsIssuedTo": "arn:aws:ec2:eu-west-2:111122223333:instance/i-0c1a23fc456b7ab89"
        }
    },
    "eventTime": "2026-03-27T17:12:54Z",
    "eventSource": "secretsmanager.amazonaws.com",
    "eventName": "GetSecretValue",
    "awsRegion": "eu-west-2",
    "sourceIPAddress": "1.2.3.4",
    "userAgent": "aws-sdk-rust/1.3.14 os/linux lang/rust/1.94.1 aws-secrets-manager-agent/2.0.0",
    "requestParameters": {
        "secretId": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:eu-west-2:111122223333:secret:your-secret"
    },
    "responseElements": null,
    "requestID": "027507ea-f377-43d9-bf2f-646d4dc19223",
    "eventID": "f9c3ed0f-81f5-450b-a561-2b9e54fa9e73",
    "readOnly": true,
    "resources": [
        {
            "accountId": "111122223333",
            "type": "AWS::SecretsManager::Secret",
            "ARN": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:eu-west-2:111122223333:secret:your-secret"
        }
    ],
    "eventType": "AwsApiCall",
    "managementEvent": true,
    "recipientAccountId": "111122223333",
    "eventCategory": "Management",
    "tlsDetails": {
        "tlsVersion": "TLSv1.3",
        "cipherSuite": "TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256",
        "clientProvidedHostHeader": "secretsmanager.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com",
        "keyExchange": "X25519MLKEM768"
    }
}

If the keyExchange field shows X25519MLKEM768, then hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS is active. If it shows a traditional algorithm such as X25519, the client is not advertising ML-KEM support, and you should check the client version and configuration.

Troubleshooting

If your Secrets Manager API calls aren’t negotiating X25519MLKEM768 after updating your clients, check your SDK version, OpenSSL version (Python), and firewall or proxy configuration as shown in the Client Hybrid Post-Quantum Key Exchange Requirements section near the beginning of this post.

What’s next

This launch is one step in a broader migration. AWS is continuing to roll out ML-KEM support across AWS service HTTPS endpoints as part of Workstream 2 of the AWS PQC Migration Plan, with a target of full coverage across public AWS endpoints.

Support for CRYSTALS-Kyber, the pre-standardization predecessor to ML-KEM, is phasing out across AWS endpoints in 2026. Customers on older SDK versions that advertise only CRYSTALS-Kyber support will fall back gracefully to traditional TLS rather than negotiate the deprecated algorithm. To avoid this fallback, upgrade to the SDK versions listed in this post.

The journey of PQC migration extends beyond confidentiality of data in transit. To stay informed about the latest developments in the AWS PQC journey and your side of shared responsibility, follow the AWS Post-Quantum Cryptography page.

Conclusion

AWS Secrets Manager now enables hybrid post-quantum key exchange using ML-KEM by default to help protect your secrets and support your compliance efforts. This update requires no code changes or configuration updates for customers using the latest client versions.

This post covered how AWS Secrets Manager uses hybrid post-quantum cryptography to secure TLS connections, which clients support this capability, and how to verify that your connections are protected against harvest now, decrypt later attacks.

To benefit from this announcement today:

  • Upgrade your Secrets Manager client (Agent, Lambda extension, or CSI Driver) to the latest available versions to enable hybrid post-quantum key exchange using ML-KEM
  • If your workload uses the AWS SDK instead of a caching client, upgrade your AWS SDK and underlying dependencies to the minimum versions listed in this post
  • Verify hybrid post-quantum key exchange in TLS is active by checking the keyExchange field in CloudTrail tlsDetails for your Secrets Manager API calls
  • Test end-to-end hybrid post-quantum key exchange TLS connectivity in your environment, including network paths that traverse corporate firewalls or proxies

AWS will continue rolling out post-quantum cryptography support. For information about the broader migration effort, see the AWS PQC Migration Plan. Keep an updated cryptographic inventory of your broader environment to identify other uses of traditional public-key cryptography that will require migration. The CISA Quantum-Readiness guidance and the AWS PQC Migration Plan are good starting points.

Additional resources

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.

P. Stéphanie Mbappe

P. Stéphanie Mbappe

Stéphanie is a Security Consultant with Amazon Web Services. She delights in assisting her customers at any step of their security journey. Stéphanie enjoys learning, designing new solutions, and sharing her knowledge with others.

Tobias Nickl

Tobias Nickl

Tobias is a Security Consultant at Amazon Web Services, specializing in security architecture and cloud transformation. He partners with AWS customers to design and implement security architectures that address both current and emerging threats. Through his work, he helps organizations build security strategies that evolve with their cloud maturity.

PACIFIC enables multi-tenant, sovereign product carbon footprint exchange on the Catena-X data space using AWS

Post Syndicated from Kevin S. Ridolfi original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/pacific-enables-multi-tenant-sovereign-product-carbon-footprint-exchange-on-the-catena-x-data-space-using-aws/

This post is cowritten by Anil Akarsu and Dr. Renè Holschuh from BASF.

BASF is a global chemical industry leader and active member of the Catena-X Automotive Network. It pioneers sustainable solutions that enable automotive organizations to track carbon emissions across complex supply chains. CircularTree transforms sustainability reporting through innovative digital solutions that systematically identify and control Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across global supply networks. They establish standardized data exchange protocols through participation in forward-thinking associations including PACT, Catena-X, and ESTAINIUM. BASF and CircularTree created PACIFIC, a product powered by AWS that streamlines transparent product carbon footprint (PCF) reporting across the value chain by automating PCF data exchange, reducing manual effort, and ensuring trustworthy data sharing. Through this unique relationship, AWS helps customers integrate software, services, and processes to accelerate business transformation. This post explores how PACIFIC enables multi-tenant, sovereign PCF exchange on the Catena-X data space using Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) on AWS Fargate, Amazon Cognito, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to deliver measurable environmental impact and competitive advantage in a carbon-conscious marketplace.

Carbon data at scale, across company borders

Sustainability is now an operational requirement, driven by growing regulatory pressure in the European Union and increasing customer expectations for credible and auditable emissions data. For manufacturers in the automotive supply chain, this is especially challenging because emissions data does not live in one place. It is distributed across fragmented tiers of suppliers, different internal systems, and partner-to-partner handoffs that still happen through spreadsheets, emails, and one-off integrations.

At the same time, the industry is converging on shared ways to exchange data, with Catena-X setting expectations for interoperability and trust in cross-company collaboration. PACIFIC was built for this reality as a multi-tenant SaaS product that enables companies to manage and exchange PCFs while maintaining data sovereignty. Its Catena-X certification signals alignment with industry standards, and the partnership with BASF grounds the platform in real supply chain requirements.

Data security, sovereignty, and interoperability

To make PCF exchange work in the real world, PACIFIC needed to solve two problems at the same time: enable frictionless collaboration across companies, while guaranteeing that each company stays in full control of their data and credentials. The platform had to operate as a multi-tenant software as a service (SaaS) for the supply chain, serving organizations on shared infrastructure without introducing any possibility of cross-tenant access.

They had to build an interoperable solution that could communicate with other solution providers on the Catena-X data space, using Eclipse Dataspace Components (EDC) connectors as a standard mechanism for cross-company data exchange. That meant enforcing strict data sovereignty, not only for PCF records but also for sensitive Catena-X integration configuration such as EDC and Digital Twin Registry (DTR) credentials. At the exchange layer, PACIFIC needed end-to-end authorization aligned with Catena-X expectations, where PCF data is shared only after explicit agreement and policy negotiation through EDC. Finally, the solution had to be practical to run and scale, so the following had to happen:

  • Onboard new companies without spinning up separate AWS accounts per tenant
  • Integrate suppliers’ PCF systems like BASF without tight coupling to the exchange workflow
  • Keep the platform secure, auditable, and operable as usage grows

Solution overview

Figure 1 gives a high-level view of how PACIFIC is built and deployed to enable secure, multi-tenant PCF exchange on the Catena-X data space. It shows the main building blocks of the product, how user traffic reaches the application, how tenant-aware identity and authorization are enforced, and how PACIFIC separates core platform features from integrations and exchange endpoints. The diagram also highlights the external connections enabling interoperability, including supplier PCF data sources like BASF services, and EDC and DTR “enablement service providers” for Catena-X based data sharing.

AWS Cloud architecture diagram for the PACIFIC platform showing a multi-layered system. At the top, a PACIFIC Web Client connects to an Identity & Authorization layer containing Amazon Cognito, AWS IAM, and AWS Secrets Manager. Traffic flows through AWS WAF to an Application Load Balancer within a VPC, which distributes requests to Amazon ECS (AWS Fargate) hosting four containerized microservices: core-modules, integration-module, pcf-exchange-module, and edc-dtr-module. These modules connect to Amazon RDS for relational database storage and Amazon S3 for object storage. External integrations at the bottom include BASF Product Carbon Footprint Services, an EDC/DTR Service Provider, and the Catena-X Automotive Network. The diagram illustrates a secure, microservices-based architecture for automotive industry carbon footprint data exchange.

Figure 1: PACIFIC high-level service architecture

Data protection through IAM-based tenant isolation

A core requirement for PACIFIC is maintaining data protection and security. Each company must have exclusive control over their PCF data, EDC connector, and DTR management credentials, without any possibility of cross-tenant access. Rather than provisioning separate AWS accounts per tenant PACIFIC implements a fine-grained IAM-based isolation model built on Amazon Cognito and AWS Secrets Manager. When a company joins the platform, PACIFIC automatically provisions a dedicated IAM role with a scoped policy that permits access only to that company’s secrets in Secrets Manager. Users are assigned to an Amazon Cognito user pool group linked to their company’s IAM role. When a user authenticates, the Amazon Cognito identity pool maps their group membership to the corresponding IAM role, and AWS Security Token Service (AWS STS) issues temporary credentials for that role. This means, a user’s credentials can only retrieve their own company’s EDC secrets and access to other tenants’ configuration is denied at the IAM policy level. This architecture delivers true multi-tenant isolation using native AWS identity services, without the overhead of managing dedicated accounts or Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC) per customer.

Securing PCF exchange with EDC-issued authorization tokens

Beyond tenant isolation within PACIFIC, CircularTree enforces authorization at the data exchange layer through the pcf-exchange-module, a per-tenant endpoint that serves PCF data to authorized trading partners. When a consumer’s EDC connector requests PCF data from a supplier’s EDC, the two connectors negotiate and agree on usage policies governing how the exchanged information can be used. After this agreement is established, the supplier’s EDC issues a special authorization token to the consumer’s EDC. The token derives from the supplier company’s Cognito app client credentials stored within their EDC and grants access specifically to that supplier’s pcf-exchange-module endpoint in PACIFIC. The consumer’s EDC then uses this token to call the supplier’s dedicated endpoint and retrieve the authorized PCF data. Because each tenant’s pcf-exchange-module is published as an individual endpoint, which only accepts tokens issued through the EDC handshake process, unauthorized access is prevented at multiple levels. One level is through EDC policy negotiation, and the other is through company-scoped OAuth2 token validation. This ensures that PCF data is transmitted only after explicit consent and only to the specific trading partner authorized in the data exchange agreement. Figure 2 gives an overview of the communication flow.

Data flow diagram showing a six-step secure token exchange process between Consumer EDC and Supplier EDC systems via the PACIFIC platform on AWS. The flow proceeds as follows: (1) Consumer EDC sends a Request PCF to Supplier EDC, (2) Policy Negotiation occurs between the two EDCs (shown as a dashed line), (3) a token is issued (marked with a key icon), (4) Supplier EDC provides a Data Space URL to the pcf-exchange-module, (5) Token Validation occurs between the pcf-exchange-module and the supplier-oauth2-client component (marked with a key icon), and (6) PCF Data flows back to the Consumer EDC. The PACIFIC layer at the bottom contains two AWS-hosted components: the pcf-exchange-module (orange icon) and the supplier-oauth2-client (red icon with checkmark), demonstrating OAuth2-based secure authentication for Product Carbon Footprint data exchange.

Figure 2: EDC-to-EDC communication with Cognito Oauth2 Tokens

Integrating supplier PCF systems through the integration module

While the pcf-exchange-module handles secure data exchange between trading partners using the Catena-X data space, PACIFIC also needs to ingest PCF data from suppliers’ internal systems. Running on AWS Fargate, the integration-module provides a flexible, scalable integration layer that connects to proprietary supplier PCF systems, such as BASF’s internal PCF services. Each supplier integration requires handling unique authentication flows. This ranges from OAuth2 client credentials to certificate-based authentication or API key mechanisms, all of which are securely managed through AWS Secrets Manager. The integration-module expects incoming PCF data to already conform to the standardized Catena-X PCF JSON format, ensuring consistency at the point of ingestion. After received, PCF data is stored in Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) under company-specific prefixes. This is where IAM policies make sure that only the PCF owner company can access their respective data. By decoupling supplier system integration from the data exchange layer, PACIFIC can onboard new supplier PCF data sources without impacting the downstream Catena-X data sharing workflows. This can be done while the S3-based storage model helps maintain strict data sovereignty, and each company’s PCF data remains isolated and accessible only to its rightful owner.

Conclusion

PACIFIC turns Catena-X PCF exchange from a specification into an interoperable, scalable workflow running on Amazon ECS and AWS Fargate without requiring companies to give up control of their data and credentials. The impact is measurable in both speed and operational scalability. From a business perspective, BASF highlights the most tangible improvement: when a requested PCF dataset is already available, a manual exchange can take up to around seven days, whereas PACIFIC responds in seconds, and can deliver automated updates when PCFs change. This capability delivers up to 75% time savings for both customers and BASF. It also reduces the time-to-data from days to seconds and making emissions information more visible and usable in day-to-day supply chain operations. PACIFIC’s multi-tenant architecture scales onboarding and operations without managing individual AWS accounts per company, while still enforcing strong tenant isolation through IAM-scoped access control and per-tenant exchange endpoints. This scalability translates into faster onboarding, enabling BASF to integrate significantly more partners into the data space. The results are measurable: an 80% increase in newly onboarded companies between 2024 and 2025, and 55% growth in requested products and shared PCFs over the same period. This provides a scalable baseline for expanding the number of onboarded organizations and increasing the volume of PCF data exchanged as adoption grows—without weakening data sovereignty or interoperability. These results underline PACIFIC’s role as a catalyst for accelerating decarbonization across supply chains.

We encourage you to join BASF, CircularTree, and AWS in industry data sharing through emerging data spaces and transparent, trusted PCF exchange across global supply networks. To explore more sustainability solutions and AWS architecture patterns, visit the AWS Architecture Blog and get started with PACIFIC through the Cofinity-X App Marketplace.


About the authors

Exploring common centralized and decentralized approaches to secrets management

Post Syndicated from Brendan Paul original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/exploring-common-centralized-and-decentralized-approaches-to-secrets-management/

One of the most common questions about secrets management strategies on Amazon Web Services (AWS) is whether an organization should centralize its secrets. Though this question is often focused on whether secrets should be centrally stored, there are four aspects of centralizing the secrets management process that need to be considered: creation, storage, rotation, and monitoring. In this post, we discuss the advantages and tradeoffs of centralizing or decentralizing each of these aspects of secrets management.

Centralized creation of secrets

When deciding whether to centralize secrets creation, you should consider how you already deploy infrastructure in the cloud. Modern DevOps practices have driven some organizations toward developer portals and internal developer platforms that use golden paths for infrastructure deployment. By using tools that use golden paths, developers can deploy infrastructure in a self-service model through infrastructure as code (IaC) while adhering to organizational standards.

A central function maintains these golden paths, such as a platform engineering team. Examples of services that can be used to maintain and define golden paths might include AWS services such as AWS Service Catalog or popular open source projects such as Backstage.io. Using this approach, developers can focus on application code while platform engineers focus on infrastructure deployment, security controls, and developer tooling. An example of a golden path might be a templatized implementation for a microservice that writes to a database.

For example, a golden path could define that a service or application must be built using the AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK), running on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), and use AWS Secrets Manager to retrieve database credentials. The platform team could also build checks to help ensure that the secret’s resource policy only allows access to the role being used by the microservice and is encrypted with a customer managed key. This pattern abstracts deployments away from developers and facilitates resource deployment across accounts. This is one example of a centralized creation pattern, shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Architecture diagram highlighting the developer portal deployment pattern for centralized creation

Figure 1: Architecture diagram highlighting the developer portal deployment pattern for centralized creation

The advantages of this approach are:

  • Consistent naming tagging, and access control: When secrets are created centrally, you can enforce a standard naming convention based on the account, workload, service, or data classification. This simplifies implementing scalable patterns like attribute-based access control (ABAC).
  • Least privilege checks in CI/CD pipelines: When you create secrets within the confines of IaC pipelines, you can use APIs such as the AWS IAM Access Analyzer check-no-new-access API. Deployment pipelines can be templatized, so individual teams can take advantage of organizational standards while still owning deployment pipelines.
  • Create mechanisms for collaboration between platform engineering and security teams: Often, the shift towards golden paths and service catalogs is driven by a desire for a better developer experience and reduced operational overhead. A byproduct of this move is that security teams can partner with platform engineering teams to build security by default into these paths.

The tradeoffs of this approach are:

  • It takes time and effort to make this shift. You might not have the resources to invest in full-time platform engineering or DevOps teams. To centrally provision software and infrastructure like this, you must maintain libraries of golden paths that are appropriate for the use cases of your organization. Depending on the size of your organization, this might not be feasible.
  • Golden paths must keep up with the features of the services they support: If you’re using this pattern, and the service you’re relying on releases a new feature, your developers must wait for the features to be added to the affected golden paths.

If you want to learn more about the internal developer platform pattern, check out the re:Invent 2024 talk Elevating the developer experience with Backstage on AWS.

Decentralized creation of secrets

In a decentralized model, application teams own the IaC templates and deployment mechanisms in their own accounts. Here, each team is operating independently, which can make it more difficult to enforce standards as code. We’ll refer to this pattern, shown in Figure 2, as a decentralized creation pattern.

Figure 2: Decentralized creation of secrets

Figure 2: Decentralized creation of secrets

The advantages of this approach are:

  • Speed: Developers can move quickly and have more autonomy because they own the creation process. Individual teams don’t have a dependency on a central function.
  • Flexibility: You can still use features such as the IAM Access Analyzer check-no-new-access API, but it’s up to each team to implement this in their pipeline.

The tradeoffs of this approach are:

  • Lack of standardization: It can become more difficult to enforce naming and tagging conventions, because it’s not templatized and applied through central creation mechanisms. Access controls and resource policies might not be consistent across teams.
  • Developer attention: Developers must manage more of the underlying infrastructure and deployment pipelines.

Centralized storage of secrets

Some customers choose to store their secrets in a central account, and others choose to store secrets in the accounts in which their workloads live. Figure 3 shows the architecture for centralized storage of secrets.

Figure 3: Centralized storage of secrets

Figure 3: Centralized storage of secrets

The advantages of centralizing the storage of secrets are:

  • Simplified monitoring and observability: Monitoring secrets can be simplified by keeping them in a single account and with a centralized team controlling them.

Some tradeoffs of centralizing the storage of secrets are:

  • Additional operational overhead: When sharing secrets across accounts, you must configure resource policies on each secret that is shared.
  • Additional cost of AWS KMS Customer Managed Keys: You must use AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer managed keys when sharing secrets across accounts. While this gives you an additional layer of access control over secret access, it will increase cost under the AWS KMS pricing. It will also add another policy that needs to be created and maintained.
  • High concentration of sensitive data: Having secrets in a central account can increase the number of resources affected in the event of inadvertent access or misconfiguration.
  • Account quotas: Before deciding on a centralized secret account, review the AWS service quotas to ensure you won’t hit quotas in your production environment.
  • Service managed secrets: When services such as Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) or Amazon Redshift manage secrets on your behalf, these secrets are placed in the same account as the resource with which the secret is associated. To maintain a centralized storage of secrets while using service managed secrets, the resources would also have to be centralized.

Though there are advantages to centralizing secrets for monitoring and observability, many customers already rely on services such as AWS Security Hub, IAM Access Analyzer, AWS Config, and Amazon CloudWatch for cross-account observability. These services make it easier to create centralized views of secrets in a multi-account environment.

Decentralized storage of secrets

In a decentralized approach to storage, shown in in Figure 4, secrets live in the same accounts as the workload that needs access to them.

Figure 4: Decentralized storage of secrets

Figure 4: Decentralized storage of secrets

The advantages of decentralizing the storage of secrets are:

  • Account boundaries and logical segmentation: Account boundaries provide a natural segmentation between workloads in AWS. When operating in a distributed multi-account environment, you cannot access secrets from another account by default, and all cross-account access must be allowed by both a resource policy in the source account and an IAM policy in the destination account. You can use resource control polices to prevent the sharing of secrets across accounts.
  • AWS KMS key choice: If your secrets aren’t shared across accounts, then you have the choice to use AWS KMS customer managed keys or AWS managed keys to encrypt your secrets.
  • Delegate permissions management to application owners: When secrets are stored in accounts with the applications that need to consume them, application owners define fine-grained permissions in secrets resource policies.

There are a few tradeoffs to consider for this architecture:

  • Auditing and monitoring require cross-account deployments: Tools that are used to monitor the compliance and status of secrets need to operate across multiple accounts and present information in a single place. This is simplified by AWS native tools, which are described later in this post.
  • Automated remediation workflows: You can have detective controls in place to alert on any misconfiguration or security risks related to your secrets. For example, you can surface an alert when a secret is shared outside of your organizational boundary through a resource policy. These workflows can be more complex in a multi-account environment. However, we have samples that can help, such as the Automated Security Response on AWS solution.

Centralized rotation

Like the creation and storage of secrets, organizations take different approaches to centralizing the lifecycle management and rotation of secrets.

When you centralize lifecycle management, as shown in Figure 5, a central team manages and owns AWS Lambda functions for rotation. The advantages of centralizing the lifecycle management of secrets are:

  • Developers can reuse rotation functions: In this pattern, a centralized team maintains a common library of rotation functions for different use cases. An example of this can be seen in this AWS re:Inforce session. Using this method, application teams don’t have to build their own custom rotation functions and can benefit from common architectural decisions regarding databases and third-party software as a service (SaaS) applications.
  • Logging: When storing and accessing rotation function logs, the centralized pattern can simplify managing logs from a single place.
Figure 5: Centralized rotation of secrets

Figure 5: Centralized rotation of secrets

There are some tradeoffs in centralizing the lifecycle management and rotation of secrets:

  • Additional cross-account access scenarios: When centralizing lifecycle management, the Lambda functions in central accounts require permissions to create, update, delete and read secrets in the application accounts. This increases the operational overhead required to enable secret rotation.
  • Service quotas: When you centralize a function at scale, service quotas can come into play. Check the Lambda service quotas to verify that you won’t hit quotas in your production environments.

Decentralized rotation

Decentralizing the lifecycle management of secrets is a more common choice, where the rotation functions live in the same account as the associated secret, as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Decentralized rotation of secrets

Figure 6: Decentralized rotation of secrets

The advantages of decentralizing the lifecycle management of secrets are:

  • Templatization and customization: Developers can reuse rotation templates, but tweak the functions as needed to meet their needs and use cases
  • No cross-account access: Decentralized rotation of secrets happens all in one account and doesn’t require cross-account access.

The primary tradeoff of decentralizing rotation is that you will need to provide either centralized or federated access to logs for rotation functions in different accounts. By default, Lambda automatically captures logs for all function invocations and sends them to CloudWatch Logs. CloudWatch Logs offers a few different ways that you can centralize your logs, with the tradeoffs of each described in the documentation.

Centralized auditing and monitoring of secrets

Regardless of the model chosen for creation, storage, and rotation of secrets, centralize the compliance and auditing aspect when operating in a multi-account environment. You can use AWS Security Hub CSPM through its integration with AWS Organizations to centralize:

In this scenario, shown in Figure 7, centralized functions get visibility across the organization and individual teams can view their posture at an account level with no need to look at the state of the entire organization.

Use AWS CloudTrail organizational trails to send all API calls for Secrets Manager to a centralized delegated admin account.

Figure 7: Centralized monitoring and auditing

Figure 7: Centralized monitoring and auditing

Decentralized auditing and monitoring of secrets

For organizations that don’t require centralized auditing and monitoring of secrets, you can configure access so that individual teams can determine which logs are collected, alerts are enabled, and checks are in place in relation to your secrets. The advantages of this approach are:

  • Flexibility: Development teams have the freedom to choose what monitoring, auditing, and logging tools work best for them.
  • Reduced dependencies: Development teams don’t have to rely on centralized functions for alerting and monitoring capabilities.

The tradeoffs of this approach are:

  • Operational overhead: This can create redundant work for teams looking to accomplish similar goals.
  • Difficulty aggregating logs in cross-account investigations: If logs, alerts, and monitoring capabilities are decentralized, it can increase the difficulty of investigating events that affect multiple accounts.

Putting it all together

Most organizations choose a combination of these approaches to meet their needs. An example is a financial services company that has a central security team, operates across hundreds of AWS accounts, and has hundreds of applications that are isolated at the account level. This customer could:

  • Centralize the creation process, enforcing organizational standards for naming, tagging, and access control
  • Decentralize storage of secrets, using the AWS account as a natural boundary for access and storing the secret in the account where the workload is operating, delegating control to application owners
  • Decentralize lifecycle management so that application owners can manage their own rotation functions
  • Centralize auditing, using tools like AWS Config, Security Hub, and IAM Access Analyzer to give the central security team insight into the posture of their secrets while letting application owners retain control

Conclusion

In this post, we’ve examined the architectural decisions organizations face when implementing secrets management on AWS: creation, storage, rotation, and monitoring. Each approach—whether centralized or decentralized—offers distinct advantages and tradeoffs that should align with your organization’s security requirements, operational model, and scale. The important points include:

  • Choose your secrets management architecture based on your organization’s specific requirements and capabilities. There’s no one solution that will fit every situation.
  • Use automation and IaC to enforce consistent security controls, regardless of your approach.
  • Implement comprehensive monitoring and auditing capabilities through AWS services to maintain visibility across your environment.

Resources

To learn more about AWS Secrets Manager, check out some of these resources:

Brendan Paul
Brendan Paul

Brendan is a Senior Security Solutions Architect at AWS and has been at AWS for more than 6 years. He spends most of his time at work helping customers solve problems in the data protection and workload identity domains. Outside of work, he’s pursuing his master’s degree in data science from UC Berkeley.
Eduardo Patroncinio
Eduardo Patroncinio

Eduardo is a distinguished Principal Solutions Architect on the AWS Strategic Accounts team, bringing unparalleled expertise to the forefront of cloud technology. With an impressive career spanning more than 25 years, Eduardo has been a driving force in designing and delivering innovative customer solutions within the dynamic realms of cloud and service management.

How to use the Secrets Store CSI Driver provider Amazon EKS add-on with Secrets Manager

Post Syndicated from Angad Misra original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-use-the-secrets-store-csi-driver-provider-amazon-eks-add-on-with-secrets-manager/

In this post, we introduce the AWS provider for the Secrets Store CSI Driver, a new AWS Secrets Manager add-on for Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) that you can use to fetch secrets from Secrets Manager and parameters from AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store and mount them as files in Kubernetes pods. The add-on is straightforward to install and configure, works on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instances and hybrid nodes, and includes the latest security updates and bugfixes. It provides a secure and reliable way to retrieve your secrets in Kubernetes workloads.

The AWS provider for the Secrets Store CSI Driver is an open source Kubernetes DaemonSet.

Amazon EKS add-ons provide installation and management of a curated set of add-ons for EKS clusters. You can use these add-ons to help ensure that your EKS clusters are secure and stable and reduce the number of steps required to install, configure, and update add-ons.

Secrets Manager helps you manage, retrieve, and rotate database credentials, application credentials, OAuth tokens, API keys, and other secrets throughout their lifecycles. By using Secrets Manager to store credentials, you can avoid using hard-coded credentials in application source code, helping to avoid unintended or inadvertent access.

New EKS add-on: AWS provider for the Secrets Store CSI Driver

We recommend installing the provider as an Amazon EKS add-on instead of the legacy installation methods (Helm, kubectl) to reduce the amount of time it takes to install and configure the provider. The add-on can be installed in several ways: using eksctl—which you will use in this post—the AWS Management Console, the Amazon EKS API, AWS CloudFormation, or the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI).

Security considerations

The open-source Secrets Store CSI Driver maintained by the Kubernetes community enables mounting secrets as files in Kubernetes clusters. The AWS provider relies on the CSI driver and mounts secrets as file in your EKS clusters. Security best practice recommends caching secrets in memory where possible. If you prefer to adopt the native Kubernetes experience, please follow the steps in this blog post. If you prefer to cache secrets in memory, we recommend using the AWS Secrets Manager Agent.

IAM principals require Secrets Manager permissions to get and describe secrets. If using Systems Manager Parameter Store, principals also require Parameter Store permissions to get parameters. Resource policies on secrets serve as another access control mechanism, and AWS principals must be explicitly granted permissions to access individual secrets if they’re accessing secrets from a different AWS account (see Access AWS Secrets Manager secrets from a different account). The Amazon EKS add-on provides security features including support for using FIPS endpoints. AWS provides a managed IAM policy, AWSSecretsManagerClientReadOnlyAccess, which we recommend using with the EKS add-on.

Solution walkthrough

In the following sections, you’ll create an EKS cluster, create a test secret in Secrets Manager, install the Amazon EKS add-on, and use it to retrieve the test secret and mount it as a file in your cluster.

Prerequisites

  1. AWS credentials, which must be configured in your environment to allow AWS API calls and are required to allow access to Secrets Manager
  2. AWS CLI v2 or higher
  3. Your preferred AWS Region must be available in your environment. Use the following command to set your preferred region:
    aws configure set default.region <preferred_region>
    

  4. The kubectl and eksctl command-line tools
  5. A Kubernetes deployment file hosted in the GitHub repo for the provider

With the prerequisites in place, you’re ready to run the commands in the following steps in your terminal:

Create an EKS cluster

  1. Create a shell variable in your terminal with the name of your cluster:
    CLUSTER_NAME="my-test-cluster”
    

  2. Create an EKS cluster:
    eksctl create cluster $CLUSTER_NAME 
    

eksctl will automatically use a recent version of Kubernetes and create the resources needed for the cluster to function. This command typically takes about 15 minutes to finish setting up the cluster.

Create a test secret

Create a secret named addon_secret in Secrets Manager:

aws secretsmanager create-secret \
  --name addon_secret \
  --secret-string "super secret!"

Set up the Secrets Store CSI Driver provider EKS add-on

Install the Amazon EKS add-on:

eksctl create addon \
  --cluster $CLUSTER_NAME \
  --name aws-secrets-store-csi-driver-provider

Create an IAM role

Create an AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) role that the EKS Pod Identity service principal can assume and save it in a shell variable (replace <region> with the AWS Region configured in your environment):

ROLE_ARN=$(aws --region <region> --query Role.Arn --output text iam create-role --role-name nginx-deployment-role --assume-role-policy-document '{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [
        {
            "Effect": "Allow",
            "Principal": {
                "Service": "pods.eks.amazonaws.com"
            },
            "Action": [
                "sts:AssumeRole",
                "sts:TagSession"
            ]
        }
    ]
}')

Attach a managed policy to the IAM role

Note: AWS provides a managed policy for client-side consumption of secrets through Secrets Manager: AWSSecretsManagerClientReadOnlyAccess. This policy grants access to get and describe secrets for the secrets in your account. If you want to further follow the principle of least privilege, create a custom policy scoped down to only the secrets you want to retrieve.

Attach the managed policy to the IAM role that you just created:

aws iam attach-role-policy \
  --role-name nginx-deployment-role \
  --policy-arn arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AWSSecretsManagerClientReadOnlyAccess

Set up the EKS Pod Identity Agent

Note: The add-on provides two methods of authentication: IAM roles for service accounts (IRSA) and EKS Pod Identity. In this solution, you’ll use EKS Pod Identity.

  1. After you’ve installed the add-on in your cluster, install the EKS Pod Identity Agent add-on for authentication:
    eksctl create addon \
      --cluster $CLUSTER_NAME \
      --name eks-pod-identity-agent
    

  2. Create an EKS Pod Identity association for the cluster:
    eksctl create podidentityassociation \
        --cluster $CLUSTER_NAME \
        --namespace default \
        --region <region> \
        --service-account-name nginx-pod-identity-deployment-sa \
        --role-arn $ROLE_ARN \
        --create-service-account true
    

Set up your SecretProviderClass

The SecretProviderClass is a YAML file that defines which secrets and parameters to mount as files in your cluster.

  1. Create a minimal SecretProviderClass called spc.yaml for the test secret with the following content:
    apiVersion: secrets-store.csi.x-k8s.io/v1
    kind: SecretProviderClass
    metadata:
      name: nginx-pod-identity-deployment-aws-secrets
    spec:
      provider: aws
      parameters:
        objects: |
          - objectName: "addon_secret"
            objectType: "secretsmanager"
        usePodIdentity: "true"
    

  2. Deploy your SecretProviderClass (make sure you’re in the same directory as the spc.yaml you just created):
    kubectl apply -f spc.yaml
    

To learn more about the SecretProviderClass, see the GitHub readme for the provider.

Deploy your pod to your EKS cluster

For brevity, we’ve omitted the content of the Kubernetes deployment file. The following is an example deployment file for Pod Identity in the GitHub repository for the provider—use this file to deploy your pod:

kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aws/secrets-store-csi-driver-provider-aws/main/examples/ExampleDeployment-PodIdentity.yaml

This will mount addon_secret at /mnt/secrets-store in your cluster.

Retrieve your secret

  1. Print the value of addon_secret to confirm that the secret was mounted successfully:
    kubectl exec -it $(kubectl get pods | awk '/nginx-pod-identity-deployment/{print $1}' | head -1) -- cat /mnt/secrets-store/addon_secret
    

  2. You should see the following output:
    super secret!
    

You’ve successfully fetched your test secret from Secrets Manager using the new Amazon EKS add-on and mounted it as a file in your Kubernetes cluster.

Clean up

Run the following commands to clean up the resources that you created in this tutorial:

aws secretsmanager delete-secret \
  --secret-id addon_secret \
  --force-delete-without-recovery

aws iam delete-role --role-name nginx-deployment-role

eksctl delete cluster $CLUSTER_NAME

Conclusion

In this post, you learned how to use the new Amazon EKS add-on for the AWS Secrets Store CSI Driver provider to securely retrieve your secrets and parameters and mount them as files in your Kubernetes clusters. The new EKS add-on provides benefits such as the latest security patches and bug fixes, tighter integration with Amazon EKS, and reduces the time it takes to install and configure the AWS Secrets Store CSI Driver provider. The add-on is validated by EKS to work with EC2 instances and hybrid nodes.

Further reading

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Angad Misra

Angad Misra

Angad is a Software Engineer on the AWS Secrets Manager team. When he isn’t building secure, reliable, and scalable software from first principles, he enjoys a good latte, live music, playing guitar, exploring the great outdoors, cooking, and lazing around with his cat, Freyja.

AWS Secrets Manager launches Managed External Secrets for Third-Party Credentials

Post Syndicated from Rohit Panjala original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/aws-secrets-manager-launches-managed-external-secrets-for-third-party-credentials/

Although AWS Secrets Manager excels at managing the lifecycle of Amazon Web Services (AWS) secrets, managing credentials from third-party software providers presents unique challenges for organizations as they scale usage of their cloud applications. Organizations using multiple third-party services frequently develop different security approaches for each provider’s credentials because there hasn’t been a standardized way to manage them. When storing these third-party credentials in Secrets Manager, organizations frequently maintain additional metadata within secret values to facilitate service connections. This approach requires updating entire secret values when metadata changes and implementing provider-specific secret rotation processes that are manual and time consuming. Organizations looking to automate secret rotation typically develop custom functions tailored to each third-party software provider, requiring specialized knowledge of both third-party and AWS systems.

To help customers streamline third-party secrets management, we’re introducing a new feature in AWS Secrets Manager called managed external secrets. In this post, we explore how this new feature simplifies the management and rotation of third-party software credentials while maintaining security best practices.

Introducing managed external secrets

AWS Secrets Manager has a proven track record of helping customers secure and manage secrets for AWS services such as Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) or Amazon DocumentDB through managed rotation capabilities. Building on this success, Secrets Manager now introduces managed external secrets, a new secret type that extends this same seamless experience to third-party software applications like Salesforce, simplifying secret management challenges through standardized formats and automated rotation.

You can use this capability to store secrets vended by third-party software providers in predefined formats. These formats were developed in collaboration with trusted integration partners to define both the secret structure and required metadata for rotation, eliminating the need for you to define your own custom storage strategies. Managed external secrets also provides automated rotation by directly integrating with software providers. With no rotation functions to maintain, you can reduce your operational overhead while benefiting from essential security controls, including fine-grained permissions management using AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), secret access monitoring through Amazon CloudWatch and AWS CloudTrail, and automated secret-specific threat detection through Amazon GuardDuty. Moreover, you can implement centralized and consistent secret management practices across both AWS and third-party secrets from a single service, eliminating the need to operate multiple secrets management solutions at your organization. Managed external secrets follows standard Secrets Manager pricing, with no additional cost for using this new secret type.

Prerequisites

To create a managed external secret, you need an active AWS account with appropriate access to Secrets Manager. The account must have sufficient permissions to create and manage secrets, including the ability to access the AWS Management Console or programmatic access through the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) or AWS SDKs. At minimum, you need IAM permissions for the following actions: secretsmanager:DescribeSecret, secretsmanager:GetSecretValue, secretsmanager:UpdateSecret, and secretsmanager:UpdateSecretVersionStage.

You must have valid credentials and necessary access permissions for the third-party software provider you plan to have AWS manage secrets for.

For secret encryption, you must decide whether to use an AWS managed AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) key or a customer managed KMS key. For customer managed keys, make sure you have the necessary key policies configured. The AWS KMS key policy should allow Secrets Manager to use the key for encryption and decryption operations.

Create a managed external secret

Today, managed external secrets supports three integration partners: Salesforce, Snowflake, and BigID. Secrets Manager will continue to expand its partner list and more third-party software providers will be added over time. For the latest list, refer to Integration Partners.

To create a managed external secret, follow the steps in the following sections.

Note: This example demonstrates the steps for retrieving Salesforce External Client App Credentials, but a similar process can be followed for other third-party vendor credentials integrated with Secrets Manager.

To select secret type and add details:

  1. Go to the Secrets Manager service in the AWS Management Console and choose Store a new secret.
  2. Under Secret type, select Managed external secret.
  3. In the AWS Secrets Manager integrated third-party vendor credential section, select your provider from the available options. For this walkthrough, we select Salesforce External Client App Credential.
  4. Enter your configurations in the Salesforce External Client App Credential secret details section. The Salesforce External Client App credentials consist of several key components:
    1. The Consumer key (client ID), which serves as the credential identifier for OAuth 2.0. You can retrieve the consumer key directly from the Salesforce External Client App Manager OAuth settings.
    2. The Consumer secret (client secret), which functions as the private password for OAuth 2.0 authentication. You can retrieve the consumer secret directly from the Salesforce External Client App Manager OAuth settings.
    3. The Base URI, which is your Salesforce org’s base URL (formatted as https://MyDomainName.my.salesforce.com), is used to interact with Salesforce APIs.
    4. The App ID, which identifies your Salesforce External Client Apps (ECAs) and can be retrieved by calling the Salesforce OAuth usage endpoint.
    5. The Consumer ID, which identifies your Salesforce ECA, can be retrieved by calling the Salesforce OAuth credentials by App ID endpoint. For a list of commands, refer to Stage, Rotate, and Delete OAuth Credentials for an External Client App in the Salesforce documentation.
  5. Select the Encryption key from the dropdown menu. You can use an AWS managed KMS key or a customer managed KMS key.
  6. Choose Next.
Figure 1: Choose secret type

Figure 1: Choose secret type

To configure a secret:

  1. In this section, you need to provide information for your secret’s configuration.
  2. In Secret name, enter a descriptive name and optionally enter a detailed Description that helps identify the secret’s purpose and usage. You also have additional configuration choices available: you can attach Tags for better resource organization, set specific Resource permissions to control access, and select Replicate secret for multi-Region resilience.
  3. Choose Next.
Figure 2: Configure secret

Figure 2: Configure secret

To configure rotation and permissions (optional):

In the optional Configure rotation step, the new secret configuration introduces two key sections focused on metadata management, which are stored separately from the secret value itself.

  1. Under Rotation metadata, specify the API version your Salesforce app is using. To find the API version, refer to List Available REST API Versions in the Salesforce documentation. Note: The minimum version needed is v65.0.
  2. Select an Admin secret ARN, which contains the administrative OAuth credentials that are used to rotate the Salesforce client secret.
  3. In the Service permissions for secret rotation section, Secrets Manager automatically creates a role with necessary permissions to rotate your secret values. These default permissions are transparently displayed in the interface for review when you choose view permission details. You can deselect the default permissions for more granular control over secret rotation management.
  4. Choose Next.
Figure 3: Configure rotation

Figure 3: Configure rotation

To review:

In the final step, you’ll be presented with a summary of your secret’s configuration. On the Review page, you can verify parameters before proceeding with secret creation.

After confirming that the configurations are correct, choose Store to complete the process and create your secret with the specified settings.

Figure 4: Review

Figure 4: Review

After successful creation, your secret will appear on the Secrets tab. You can view, manage, and monitor aspects of your secret, including its configuration, rotation status, and permissions. After creation, review your secret configuration, including encryption settings and resource policies for cross-account access, and examine the sample code provided for different AWS SDKs to integrate secret retrieval into your applications. The Secrets tab provides an overview of your secrets, allowing for central management of secrets. Select your secret to view Secret details.

Figure 5: View secret details

Figure 5: View secret details

Your managed external secret has been successfully created in Secrets Manager. You can access and manage this secret through the Secrets Manager console or programmatically using AWS APIs.

Onboard as an integration partner with Secrets Manager

With the new managed external secret type, third-party software providers can integrate with Secrets Manager and offer their customers a programmatic way to securely manage secrets vended by their applications on AWS. This integration provides their customers with a centralized solution for managing both the lifecycle of AWS and third-party secrets, including automatic rotation capabilities from the moment of secret creation. Software providers like Salesforce are already using this capability.

“At Salesforce, we believe security shouldn’t be a barrier to innovation, it should be an enabler. Our partnership with AWS on managed external secrets represents security-by-default in action, removing operational burden from our customers while delivering enterprise-grade protection. With AWS Secrets Manager now extending to partners and automated zero-touch rotation eliminating human risk, we’re setting a new industry standard where secure credentials become seamless without specialized expertise or additional costs.” — Jay Hurst, Sr. Vice President, Product Management at Salesforce

There is no additional cost to onboard with Secrets Manager as an integration partner. To get started, partners must follow the process listed on the partner onboarding guide. If you have questions about becoming an integration partner, contact our team at [email protected] with Subject: [Partner Name] Onboarding request.

Conclusion

In this post, we introduced managed external secrets, a new secret type in Secrets Manager that addresses the challenges of securely managing the lifecycle of third-party secrets through predefined formats and automated rotation. By eliminating the need to define custom storage strategies and develop complex rotation functions, you can now consistently manage your secrets—whether from AWS services, custom applications, or third-party providers—from a single service. Managed external secrets provide the same security features as standard Secrets Manager secrets, including fine-grained permissions management, observability, and compliance controls, while adding built-in integration with trusted partners at no additional cost.

To get started, refer to the technical documentation. For information on migrating your existing partner secrets to managed external secrets, see Migrating existing secrets. The feature is available in all AWS Regions where AWS Secrets Manager is available. For a list of Regions where Secrets Manager is available, see the AWS Region table. If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, start a new thread on Secrets Manager re:Post or contact AWS Support.

Rohit Panjala

Rohit is a Security Specialist at AWS, focused on data protection and cryptography services. He is responsible for developing and implementing go-to-market (GTM) strategies and driving customer and partner adoptions for AWS data protection services on a global scale. Before joining AWS, he worked in security product management at IBM and electrical engineering roles. He holds a BS in engineering from The Ohio State University.

Rochak Karki

Rochak is a Security Specialist Solutions Architect at AWS, focusing on threat detection, incident response, and data protection to help customers build secure environments. Rochak is a US Army veteran and holds a BS in engineering from the University of Wyoming. Outside of work, he enjoys spending time with family and friends, hiking, and traveling.

Using AWS Secrets Manager Agent with Amazon EKS

Post Syndicated from Sumanth Culli original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/using-aws-secrets-manager-agent-with-amazon-eks/

AWS Secrets Manager is a service that you can use to manage, retrieve, and rotate database credentials, application credentials, API keys, and other secrets throughout their lifecycles. You can also use Secrets Manager to replace hard-coded credentials in application source code with runtime calls to retrieve credentials dynamically when needed.

Managing secrets in Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) environments creates three main challenges: dependency on language-specific AWS SDKs, network dependencies from direct API calls, and complex secret rotation across multiple pods.

The AWS Secrets Manager Agent addresses these challenges by providing a language-agnostic HTTP interface that runs locally within your compute environment. In this post, we show you how to deploy the Secrets Manager Agent as a sidecar container in Amazon EKS to retrieve secrets through HTTP calls.

New approach: Secrets Manager Agent

The Secrets Manager Agent is a client-side agent that you can use to standardize consumption of secrets from Secrets Manager across your AWS compute environments. The agent pulls and caches secrets in your compute environment and allows your applications to consume secrets directly from the in-memory cache through a local HTTP endpoint (localhost:2773).

Instead of making network calls to Secrets Manager, you fetch secret values from the local agent, improving application availability while reducing API calls. Because the Secrets Manager Agent is language agnostic, you can use it across different programming languages without requiring AWS SDK dependencies.

Post-quantum cryptography protection

The Secrets Manager Agent implements ML-KEM (Machine Learning-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism) key exchange, which provides additional cryptographic protection for secret retrieval operations. This feature is enabled by default and requires no additional configuration.

Authentication and access control

This solution uses Amazon EKS Pod Identity for secure authentication to AWS services. Pod Identity provides a simplified way to associate AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles with Kubernetes service accounts, avoiding the need for OpenID Connect (OIDC) provider configuration. IAM principals need GetSecretValue and DescribeSecret permissions to retrieve secrets through the agent.

The Secrets Manager Agent offers protection against server-side request forgery (SSRF). When you install the agent, it generates a random SSRF token and stores it in /var/run/awssmatoken. The agent actively blocks requests that don’t include this token in the X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token header.

Solution overview

In this solution, you deploy the Secrets Manager Agent as a sidecar container in an Amazon EKS pod alongside an NGINX application. The sidecar pattern helps make sure that each pod has its own agent instance, providing isolation and fine-grained security boundaries.

This post demonstrates the Secrets Manager Agent sidecar approach, complementing the AWS Secrets and Configuration Provider (ASCP) guidance covered in Announcing ASCP integration with Pod Identity.

Amazon EKS supports multiple patterns for consuming Secrets Manager secrets. The ASCP for the Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver works well when you want secrets mounted as files and prefer Kubernetes-native secret management. Use the Secrets Manager Agent when you need HTTP-based secret access, want to avoid pod restarts during secret rotation, or need granular refresh control via the refreshNow parameter.

Choosing between Secrets Manager Agent and CSI Driver:

Approach

Access method

Best for

Secrets Manager Agent

HTTP API calls to localhost:2773

Applications needing runtime secret access, dynamic refresh, and language-agnostic HTTP interface

ASCP and CSI Driver (blog post)

Secrets mounted as files

Kubernetes-native secret management and file-based secret consumption

Each secret management approach has specific advantages for different use cases. The Secrets Manager Agent works well for applications requiring HTTP-based access and dynamic secret updates, while the ASCP with CSI Driver is ideal for applications that need file-based secret mounting. Consider your application’s specific requirements, operational patterns, and security needs when choosing between these approaches.

To deploy the solution, you build the agent binary, containerize it, and deploy it to Amazon EKS using Kubernetes manifests with Amazon EKS Pod Identity for secure access to Secrets Manager.

Figure 1: Solution workflow

Figure 1: Solution workflow

The workflow of the solution is shown in Figure 1 and includes the following steps:

  1. The application container sends GET /secretsmanager/get (localhost:2773) to retrieve secret
  2. Secrets Manager Agent checks the local cache to determine if the secret is already stored in memory
    • If not cached, authenticate using Pod Identity to establish secure access to AWS Secrets Manager
    • Assume the IAM role to retrieve the secret from AWS Secrets Manager
    • Return the secret to the sidecar container for caching
  3. Return the secret to the application container to fulfill the original request

Prerequisites

To build the solution in this post, you must have the following:

Install the Secrets Manager Agent

In this section, you install the Secrets Manager Agent. With the agent installed, you then create the Pod Identity association, Secrets Manager binary image, push the binary image to Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR), and create a secret in Secrets Manager.

  1. Verify the Pod Identity Agent installation:
  2. kubectl get daemonset eks-pod-identity-agent -n kube-system

  3. Create the Pod Identity association using the following commands:
  4. aws eks create-pod-identity-association \   
    	--cluster-name <cluster> \   
    	--namespace default \   
    	--service-account secrets-manager-sa \   
    	--role-arn arn:aws:iam::<ACCOUNT_ID>:role/eks-secrets-manager-role

  5. Create a file named install and add the following content:
  6. #!/bin/bash -e 
    PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin # Use a safe path 
    AGENTTARGETDIR=/opt/aws/secretsmanageragent 
    AGENTSOURCEDIR=/etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration 
    AGENTBIN=aws_secretsmanager_agent 
    TOKENGROUP=awssmatokenreader 
    AGENTUSER=awssmauser 
    TOKENSCRIPT=/etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration/awssmaseedtoken 
    AGENTSCRIPT=awssmastartup 
    if [ `id -u` -ne 0 ]; then     
    	echo "This script must be run as root" >&2     
    	exit 1 
    fi 
    if [ ! -r ${TOKENSCRIPT} ]; then     
    	echo "Can not read ${TOKENSCRIPT}" >&2     
    	exit 1 
    fi 
    if [ ! -r ${AGENTSOURCEDIR}/${AGENTBIN} ]; then     
    	echo "Can not read ${AGENTBIN}" >&2     
    	exit 1 
    fi 
    groupadd -f ${TOKENGROUP} 
    useradd -r -m -g ${TOKENGROUP} -d ${AGENTTARGETDIR} ${AGENTUSER} || true 
    chmod 755 ${AGENTTARGETDIR} 
    install -D -T -m 755 
    ${AGENTSOURCEDIR}/${AGENTBIN} ${AGENTTARGETDIR}/bin/${AGENTBIN} 
    chown -R ${AGENTUSER} ${AGENTTARGETDIR} 
    exit 0

  7. Build the agent binary on a Linux based instance using the following commands:
  8. #!/bin/bash -e
    # Here we are building the Secrets Manager Agent Binary for Linux x86_64 architecture
    sudo yum -y groupinstall "Development Tools"
    sudo yum install -y git
    curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh -s -- -y
    source $HOME/.cargo/env
    git clone https://github.com/aws/aws-secretsmanager-agent
    cd aws-secretsmanager-agent
    mv ../install aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration
    cargo build --release --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

  9. Create a file named startup.sh for the entry point and add the following content:
  10. #!/bin/bash 
    set -e 
    
    echo "Starting AWS Secrets Manager Agent initialization..." 
    
    # Step 1: Run the install script (equivalent to install-agent init container) 
    echo "Running agent installation..." 
    /etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration/install 
    
    # Step 2: Initialize the token (equivalent to token-init init container) 
    echo "Starting token initialization..." 
    chmod +x 
    /etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration/awssmaseedtoken /etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration/awssmaseedtoken start 
    
    # Step 3: Start the main secrets manager agent 
    echo "Starting secrets manager agent..." 
    exec 
    /etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration/aws_secretsmanager_agent

  11. Create a file named Docker-eks and add the following content:
  12. FROM public.ecr.aws/amazonlinux/amazonlinux:2023 
    
    # Install required dependencies 
    RUN yum install -y ca-certificates bash shadow-utils && yum clean all 
    RUN mkdir -p /opt/aws/secretsmanageragent /var/run 
    
    # Copy in the agent binary and configuration scripts 
    COPY aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration/ 
    /etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration 
    COPY target/x86_64-unknown-linux-
    gnu/release/aws_secretsmanager_agent 
    /etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration 
    
    # Make binaries and scripts executable 
    RUN chmod -R +x /etc/aws_secretsmanager_agent/configuration 
    
    # Copy and setup startup script 
    COPY startup.sh /startup.sh 
    RUN chmod +x /startup.sh 
    
    WORKDIR / 
    # Use the startup script as entrypoint 
    ENTRYPOINT ["/startup.sh"]

  13. Build and publish the image using the following commands:
#!/bin/bash -e 

#Create the ECR Repo ( us-west-2 region) 
aws ecr create-repository --repository-name secrets-manager-agent --image-tag-mutability MUTABLE 

#Build the image 
docker build -f Dockerfile-eks -t secrets-manager-agent:eks . 

#Tag the image 
docker tag secrets-manager-agent:eks <ACCOUNT_ID>.dkr.ecr.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/secrets-manager-agent:eks 

# Login into ECR 
aws ecr get-login-password --region us-west-2 | docker login --username AWS --password-stdin <ACCOUNT_ID>.dkr.ecr.us-west-2.amazonaws.com 

#Push the image  
docker push  <ACCOUNT_ID>.dkr.ecr.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/secrets-manager-agent:eks         

When successful, your private Amazon ECR repo will display the published image.

Create the secret

With the image successfully published, you’re ready to create the secret.

  1. Create a secret in Secrets Manager by using the AWS CLI to enter the following command in a terminal.
  2. aws secretsmanager create-secret --name MySecret --description "My Secret" \       
    	--secret-string "{\"user\": \"my_user\", \"password\": \"my-password\"}"

  3. You should see an output like the following:
  4. 	{     
        "ARN": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-west-
       2:XXXXXXXXXXXX:secret:MySecret-LrBlpm",     
       	"Name": "MySecret",     "VersionId": "b5e73e9b-6ec5-4144-a176-3648304b2d60"     
        }

  5. Record the secret Amazon Resource Name (ARN) to use in the next section.

Create the IAM role

The Amazon EKS application needs an IAM role that grants permission to retrieve the secret you just created.

To create the IAM role:
1. Using an editor, create a file named eks_iam_policy.json with the following content:

 {     
     "Version": "2012-10-17",     
     "Statement": [         
         {             
             "Effect": "Allow",             
             "Principal": {                 
                 "Service": "pods.eks.amazonaws.com"             
             },             
             "Action": [                 
                 "sts:AssumeRole",                 
                 "sts:TagSession"             
             ]         
         }     
     ] 
 }

2. Enter the following command in a terminal to create the IAM role:
aws iam create-role --role-name eks-secrets-manager-role\
--assume-role-policy-document file://eks_iam_policy.json
3. Create a file named iam_permission.json with the following content, replacing <SECRET_ARN> with the secret ARN you noted earlier:

{     
    "Version": "2012-10-17",     
    "Statement": [         
        {             
            "Effect": "Allow",             
            "Action": [                 
                "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue",                 
                "secretsmanager:DescribeSecret"             
            ],             
            "Resource": "<SECRET_ARN>"         
        }     
    ] 
}

4. Enter the following command to create a policy:
aws iam create-policy \
--policy-name get-secret-policy \
--policy-document file://iam_permission.json
5. Record the policy ARN to use in the next step.

6. Enter the following command to add this policy to the IAM role, replacing <POLICY_ARN> with the value you just noted:
aws iam attach-role-policy \
--role-name eks-secrets-manager-role \
--policy-arn <POLICY_ARN>

Configure the application and deploy Secrets Manager Agent to Amazon EKS

Here is the sample Kubernetes deployment YAML for installing the Secrets Manager Agent as a sidecar container along with an application container. Replace <ACCOUNT_ID> with your AWS account number and run the code to deploy the NGINX application to the Amazon EKS cluster.

# nginx-with-secrets-agent.yaml 
apiVersion: apps/v1 
kind: Deployment 
metadata:   
	name: nginx-with-secrets-simplified   
	labels:     
		app: nginx-with-secrets-simplified 
	spec:   
		replicas: 1   
		selector:     
			matchLabels:       
				app: nginx-with-secrets-simplified   
		template:     
			metadata:       
				labels:         
					app: nginx-with-secrets-simplified     
			spec:       
				serviceAccountName: secrets-manager-sa       
				containers:         
					- 	name: nginx           
						image: nginx:latest           	
						ports:             
							- containerPort: 80           
							volumeMounts:                  
								- 	name: token-volume               
									mountPath: /var/run         
					- 	name: secrets-manager-agent           
						image: <ACCOUNT_ID>.dkr.ecr.us-west-
2.amazonaws.com/secrets-manager-agent:eks           
						env:             
							- 	name: AWS_TOKEN               
								value: "file:///var/run/awssmatoken"           
						volumeMounts:             
							- 	name: token-volume               
								mountPath: /var/run                    

					volumes:         
						- 	name: token-volume           
							emptyDir: {}          
--- 
apiVersion: v1 
kind: Service 
metadata:   
	name: nginx-service 
spec:   
	selector:     
		app: nginx-with-secrets-simplified   
	ports:     
		- 	port: 80       
			targetPort: 80   
	type: ClusterIP 

--- 
apiVersion: v1 
kind: ServiceAccount 
metadata:   
	name: secrets-manager-sa

kubectl apply -f nginx-with-secrets-agent.yaml

If successful, the pod will run with two active containers.

Retrieve the secret

Now you can run the following command to use the local web server to retrieve the agent. kubectl exec into the app container to retrieve the secret with a REST API call from the web server.
kubectl exec -it nginx-with-secrets-c7945f8dc-7hrzr -c nginx -- sh
curl -v -H “X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token: $(cat
/var/run/awssmatoken)”
‘http://localhost:2773/secretsmanager/get?secretId=<SecretID>'

You should see a Success 200 message and the secret value if IAM permissions are configured correctly.

Clean up

Run the following cleanup script to delete the resources created for the solution:
bash
chmod +x cleanup.sh
./cleanup.sh

When done, you can check the file named cleanup.sh in the repo to verify that the cleanup was successful:

bash 
#!/bin/bash 
set -e 

echo "Cleaning up EKS resources..." 
kubectl delete deployment nginx-with-secrets-simplified --ignore-not-found=true 
kubectl delete service nginx-service --ignore-not-found=true 
kubectl delete serviceaccount secrets-manager-sa --ignore-not-found=true 

echo "Cleaning up Pod Identity association..." 
# Replace with your actual cluster name 
read -p "Enter your CLUSTER_NAME: " CLUSTER_NAME 

if [ -n "$CLUSTER_NAME" ]; then     
	ASSOCIATION_ID=$(aws eks list-pod-identity-associations \       
                     --cluster-name $CLUSTER_NAME \       
                     --query 'associations[?serviceAccount==`secrets-manager-sa`].associationId' \       
                     --output text)          

if [ -n "$ASSOCIATION_ID" ] && [ "$ASSOCIATION_ID" != 
"None" ]; then         
		aws eks delete-pod-identity-association \           
			--cluster-name $CLUSTER_NAME \           
			--association-id $ASSOCIATION_ID || echo "Pod Identity 
association already deleted"         
		echo "Pod Identity association deleted"     
	else         
		eiifcbfhcfglkdirgljchvkildrknntukkidjtldeekk
echo "No Pod Identity association found"     
	fi 
fi 

echo "Cleaning up IAM resources..." 
# Replace with your actual policy ARN from the create-policy 
output 
read -p "Enter your POLICY_ARN: " POLICY_ARN 

if [ -n "$POLICY_ARN" ]; then     
		aws iam detach-role-policy \       
			--role-name eks-secrets-manager-role \       
			--policy-arn $POLICY_ARN || echo "Policy already detached"

		aws iam delete-policy --policy-arn $POLICY_ARN || echo 
"Policy already deleted" 
fi 
aws iam delete-role --role-name eks-secrets-manager-role || echo 
"Role already deleted" 

echo "Cleaning up secret..." 
aws secretsmanager delete-secret --secret-id MySecret || echo 
"Secret already deleted" 

echo "Cleaning up container image..." 
aws ecr delete-repository \   
	--repository-name secrets-manager-agent \   
	--force || echo "Repository already deleted" 

echo "Cleanup complete!"

Conclusion

In this post, we showed you how to deploy the AWS Secrets Manager Agent as a sidecar container in Amazon EKS. This approach provides a language-agnostic way to retrieve secrets through HTTP calls, reducing SDK dependencies while maintaining security through SSRF protection and IAM-based access controls.

The Secrets Manager Agent can be deployed as either a sidecar container or DaemonSet. Use sidecar deployment for isolated secrets and fine-grained security boundaries and use DaemonSet deployment for shared secrets across multiple applications with optimized resource utilization.

This approach complements existing secret management patterns and provides teams with HTTP-based secret access, immediate refresh control, and consistent interfaces across AWS compute environments.

To learn more, visit the AWS Secrets Manager documentation.


If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Sumanth Culli

Sumanth Culli
Sumanth is an AWS Proserve Architect on the AWS Global Financial Services team, bringing expertise to the forefront of cloud technology. With a career spanning over 20 years, Sumanth has been a driving force in designing and delivering innovative customer solutions within the AWS Cloud.

Rakesh Shirke

Rakesh Shirke
Rakesh Shirke is a Lead Solutions Architect at Amazon Web Services with over 18 years of experience in banking, payments, and enterprise architecture. As a trusted advisor to Fortune 100 financial institutions, he brings a security-first approach to architecting mission-critical systems in the AWS Cloud.

How to use the new AWS Secrets Manager Cost Allocation Tags feature

Post Syndicated from Jirka Fajfr original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-use-the-new-aws-secrets-manager-cost-allocation-tags-feature/

AWS Secrets Manager is a service that you can use to manage, retrieve, and rotate database credentials, application credentials, API keys, and other secrets throughout their lifecycles. You can use Secrets Manager to replace hard-coded credentials in application source code with a runtime call to the Secrets Manager service to retrieve credentials dynamically when you need them. Storing the credentials in Secrets Manager helps avoid unintended access by anyone who inspects your application’s source code, configuration, or components.

Until today, your AWS bill would reflect the total cost of Secrets Manager in any given account, and you had no option to break out the cost per secret to a given cost center or organization.

In this post, we introduce a new feature—Secrets Manager Costs Allocation Tags—and walk through how you can use them for improved visibility into your Secrets Manager costs. Before getting into the details of this new feature, we want to give you primer about cost allocation tags.

A tag is a key-value pair that you assign to an AWS resource. In AWS Cost Explorer, you can activate tags as cost allocation tags. With tags activated, you can categorize and track costs by cost allocation tags. For example, you can create a tag named Group with value Engineering and assign it to resources owned by the engineering team of your company. After activating the Group tag as a cost allocation tag, you can track charges with this tag, filter or group by tags in Cost Explorer, and add tags to reports such as cost and usage reports for further analysis and visualization.

Cost allocation in AWS is a four step process:

  1. Create the required cost allocation tags
  2. Attach cost allocation tags to your resources
  3. Activate your tags in the Cost Allocation Tags section of the AWS Billing console
  4. Filter the tags, group by tags in Cost Explorer, and create cost categories

After you create and attach the tags to resources, they appear in the AWS Billing console Cost Allocation Tags section under User-defined cost allocation tags within 24 hours. You must activate these tags for AWS to start tracking them for your resources and for the tags to show up in Cost Explorer. When the tags appear under Tags in the Filter or Group by fields in Cost Explorer, you can start filtering or grouping by tag to view usage and charges by tag.

AWS Secrets Manager now supports cost allocation tags

Secrets Manager now supports cost allocation tags, giving you more granular control and visibility into your Secrets Manager costs. You can use this feature to categorize and track your Secrets Manager usage charges at a more detailed level, helping you to better understand and manage your AWS spending and assign costs per secret back to cost centers or organizations.

Solution overview: Enhanced cost visibility and management

With this new capability, you can:

  • Break down Secrets Manager costs by department, project, environment, or other dimensions important to your organization
  • View itemized Secrets Manager usage in Cost Explorer as well as in cost and usage reports
  • Improve cost allocation and chargeback processes across your business units and organizations

Prerequisites

To walk through the examples in this post, you need to have the following:

  1. An AWS account
  2. Access to the AWS Management Console or the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) version 2
  3. An existing tagging and cost allocation strategy
  4. Existing secrets inside Secrets Manager

Create user-defined tags for cost allocation purposes using the console

In this example, we assume that you want to manage the cost of your secrets by different cost centers in your organization. Here, we create a tag with CostCenter as a key and the value equal to the cost center codes of the teams that are using secrets.

You’ll walk through two examples, the first one with a cost center for Engineering and a second one with a cost center for Finance. You will reuse those examples throughout this post.

In this example, start by creating and assigning a tag called cost allocation center with the key name: CostCenter and assign a cost center value of 7263 for the engineering department to an existing or new secret.

To assign a user-defined tag to a new or existing secret:

  1. In the Secrets Manager console, choose Secrets from the navigation pane.
  2. In the list of available secrets, select the secret to edit the tags or choose Store A New Secret to create a new secret.
  3. When the secret is displayed, select the Tags option and choose Edit Tags to add new or edit existing tags.
    Figure 1: Assign a user-defined tag to an existing secret

    Figure 1: Assign a user-defined tag to an existing secret

  4. Repeat the process, but assign the cost center value of 7263 for the engineering department and 1121 for the finance department to a second secret.

Create user-defined tags for cost allocation purposes using the AWS CLI

Optionally, you can use the AWS CLI to create the same tags as in the preceding example.

To use the AWS CLI to create tags:

  1. Use the following AWS CLI command to create the first tag:
    aws secretsmanager tag-resource \
        --secret-id prod/mastersecret \
        --tags Key=Role,Value=admin
    

  2. Create the second tag using the following AWS CLI command:
    aws secretsmanager tag-resource \
        --secret-id prod/mastersecret \
        --tags Key=CostCenter,Value=7263
    

    This command produces no output in case of a successful execution.

  3. Use the second AWS CLI command with a value of 1121 for the second secret.

Turn tags into cost allocation tags using the AWS Billing and Cost Management console

The next step is to activate the user-defined tags within the AWS Billing and Cost Management console so they can be used.

To activate cost allocation tags:

  1. Go to the AWS Billing and Cost Management console and choose Cost allocation tags in the navigation pane.
  2. Select the option for user-defined cost allocation tags.
  3. Select the tag keys that you want to activate.
  4. Choose Activate.

Note: After you create and apply user-defined tags to your resources, it can take up to 24 hours for the tag keys to appear on your cost allocation tags page for activation. It can then take up to 24 hours for tag keys to activate.

Figure 2: Activate cost allocation tags

Figure 2: Activate cost allocation tags

Turn tags into cost allocation tags using the AWS CLI

You can also activate user-defined tags within the AWS Billing and Cost Management Console using the AWS CLI.

To activate tags using the AWS CLI:

  1. For activation of the first user-defined tag use the following AWS CLI command:
    aws ce update-cost-allocation-tags-status \
        --cost-allocation-tags-status TagKey=Role,Status=Active
    

  2. To activate the second user-defined tag use the following AWS CLI command:
    aws ce update-cost-allocation-tags-status \
        --cost-allocation-tags-status TagKey=CostCenter,Status=Active
    

View the results in Cost Explorer

The last step is to view the results for secrets in Cost Explorer. When the tag CostCenter shows up under Tags in the Filter or Group By fields in Cost Explorer, you can start filtering or grouping by the tag to view usage and charges by tag.

When applying the tag filter for Secrets Manager, Cost Explorer displays charges only for resources tagged with the selected tag values. And when grouped by a particular tag, the charges are grouped by each value of the selected tag.

To view results:

As an example, use the following parameters to view results.

  1. In the Cost Center console, select the right arrow (>) icon to open the report parameters options to the right of the billing dashboard.
  2. On the Report parameters window:
    1. For Date Range, enter the desired time range.
    2. Under Group by, for Dimension, select Tag, and for Tag select Cost Center.
    3. For Filters, Service, select Secrets Manager.
      Figure 3: Configure report parameters

      Figure 3: Configure report parameters

You can use the resulting report to clearly identify the cost and usage of the two secrets, broken down into the two cost centers: engineering 7263 and finance 1121. Now, you can cross-charge secrets to the corresponding cost centers in your organization and provide a report similar to Figure 4.

Figure 4: Cost and usage report

Figure 4: Cost and usage report

Conclusion

In this post, we introduced the AWS Secrets Manager Cost Allocation Tags feature and showed you how to use AWS Cost Explorer Costs and Usage Reports to gain secrets usage insights. You can now allocate the cost for every secret to one or more cost centers and charge them accordingly. See the AWS Secrets Manager Cost Allocation Tag documentation to learn more about how you can use Secrets Manager Cost Allocation Tags in your accounts.

Go to the AWS Secrets Manager console to get started. For more information, see AWS Secrets Manager.

To learn more about how to build an effective tagging strategy for cost allocation and financial management, see the Tags for cost allocation and financial management whitepaper.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Jirka Fajfr

Jirka Fajfr

Jirka is a Software Engineer at AWS working in the Cryptography organization focusing on AWS Secrets Manager. He’s passionate about helping customers secure their applications and manage sensitive information and contributes to building and improving secure, scalable solutions for secrets management in the cloud. Before joining AWS, he applied neural networks to predict electricity load demand and price, bringing together data science and utility infrastructure.

Marc Luescher

Marc Luescher

Marc is a Senior Solutions Architect helping enterprise customers be successful, focusing strongly on threat detection, incident response, and data protection. His background is in networking, security, and observability. Previously, he worked in technical architecture and security hands-on positions within the healthcare sector as an AWS customer. Outside of work, Marc enjoys his two dogs, three cats, twenty chickens, and his huge yard.

ML-KEM post-quantum TLS now supported in AWS KMS, ACM, and Secrets Manager

Post Syndicated from Alex Weibel original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/ml-kem-post-quantum-tls-now-supported-in-aws-kms-acm-and-secrets-manager/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is excited to announce that the latest hybrid post-quantum key agreement standards for TLS have been deployed to three AWS services. Today, AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS), AWS Certificate Manager (ACM), and AWS Secrets Manager endpoints now support Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism (ML-KEM) for hybrid post-quantum key agreement in non-FIPS endpoints in all AWS Regions in the aws partition. The AWS Secrets Manager Agent, built on AWS SDK for Rust now also has opt-in support for hybrid post-quantum key agreement. With this, customers can bring secrets into their applications with end-to-end post-quantum enabled TLS.

These three services were chosen because they are security-critical AWS services with the most urgent need for post-quantum confidentiality. These three AWS services have previously deployed support for CRYSTALS-Kyber, the predecessor of ML-KEM. Support for CRYSTALS-Kyber will continue through 2025, but will be removed across all AWS service endpoints in 2026 in favor of ML-KEM.

Our migration to post-quantum cryptography

AWS is committed to following our post-quantum cryptography migration plan. As part of this commitment, and part of the AWS post-quantum shared responsibility model, AWS plans to deploy support for ML-KEM to all AWS services with HTTPS endpoints over the coming years. AWS customers must update their TLS clients and SDKs to offer ML-KEM when connecting to AWS service HTTPS endpoints. This will protect against future harvest now, decrypt later threats posed by quantum computing advancements. Meanwhile, AWS service HTTPS endpoints will be responsible for selecting ML-KEM when offered by clients.

Our commitment to negotiate hybrid post-quantum key agreement algorithms is enabled by AWS Libcrypto (AWS-LC), our open-source FIPS-140-3-validated cryptographic library used throughout AWS, and s2n-tls, our open-source TLS implementation used across AWS service HTTPS endpoints. AWS-LC has been awarded multiple FIPS certificates from NIST (#4631, #4759, and #4816), and was the first open-source cryptographic module to include ML-KEM in a FIPS 140-3 validation.

The effect of hybrid post-quantum ML-KEM on TLS performance

Migrating from an Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH)-only key agreement to an ECDH+ML-KEM hybrid key agreement necessarily requires that the TLS handshake send more data and perform more cryptographic operations. Switching from a classical to a hybrid post-quantum key agreement will transfer approximately 1600 additional bytes during the TLS handshake and will require approximately 80–150 microseconds more compute time to perform ML-KEM cryptographic operations. This is a one-time TLS connection startup cost and is amortized over the lifetime of the TLS connection across the HTTP requests sent over that connection.

AWS is working to provide a smooth migration to hybrid post-quantum key agreement for TLS. This work includes performing benchmarks on example workloads to help customers understand the impact of enabling hybrid post-quantum key agreement with ML-KEM.

Using the AWS SDK for Java v2, AWS has measured the number of AWS KMS GenerateDataKey requests per second that a single thread can issue serially between an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) C6in.metal client and the public AWS KMS endpoint. Both the client and server were in the us-west-2 Region. Classical TLS connections to AWS KMS negotiated the P256 elliptic curve for key agreement, and hybrid post-quantum TLS connections negotiated the X25519 elliptic curve with ML-KEM-768 for their hybrid key agreement. Your own performance characteristics might differ and will depend on your environment, including your instance type, your workload profiles, the amount of parallelism and number of threads used, and your network location and capacity. The HTTP request transaction rates were measured with TLS connection reuse both enabled and disabled.

Figure 1 shows the number of requests per second issued at different percentiles when TLS 1.3 connection reuse is disabled. It shows that in the worst-case scenario—when the cost of a TLS handshake is never amortized and every HTTP request must perform a full TLS handshake—enabling hybrid post-quantum TLS decreases the transactions per second (TPS) by about 2.3 percent on average, from 108.7 TPS to 106.2 TPS.

Figure 1: AWS KMS GenerateDataKey requests per second <em>without</em> TLS connection reuse” width=”1747″ height=”1221″ class=”size-full wp-image-37873″ style=”border: 1px solid #bebebe”></p>
<p id=Figure 1: AWS KMS GenerateDataKey requests per second without TLS connection reuse

Figure 2 shows the number of requests per second issued at different percentiles when TLS connection reuse is enabled. Reusing TLS connections and amortizing the cost of a TLS handshake over many HTTP requests is the default setting in the AWS SDK for Java v2. We show that enabling hybrid post-quantum TLS when using default SDK settings leaves the TPS rate almost unchanged, with only a 0.05 percent decrease on average, from 216.1 TPS to 216.0 TPS.

Figure 2: AWS KMS GenerateDataKey requests per second <em>with</em> TLS connection reuse” width=”1747″ height=”1226″ class=”size-full wp-image-37874″ style=”border: 1px solid #bebebe”></p>
<p id=Figure 2: AWS KMS GenerateDataKey requests per second with TLS connection reuse

Our results show that the performance impact of enabling hybrid post-quantum TLS is negligible when using typical configuration settings in your SDK. Our measurements show that enabling hybrid post-quantum TLS for a default-case example workload only lowered maximum TPS rate by 0.05 percent. Our results also show that overriding SDK defaults to force the worst-case scenario of performing a new TLS handshake for every request only decreased maximum TPS rate by 2.3 percent.

The following table shows the benchmark data that we measured. Each benchmark performed 500 one-second TPS measurements for varying TLS key agreement settings and TLS connection reuse settings. The measurements used v2.30.22 of the AWS SDK for Java v2. The TLS key agreement was switched between classical and hybrid post-quantum by toggling the postQuantumTlsEnabled() configuration. TLS connection reuse was toggled by injecting a Connection: close HTTP header into each HTTP request. This header forces the TLS connection to be shut down after each HTTP request and requires that a new TLS connection be created for each HTTP request.

TLS key agreement TLS conn resuse Total HTTP requests Average (TPS) p01 (TPS) p10 (TPS) p25 (TPS) p50 (TPS) p75 (TPS) p90 (TPS) p99 (TPS)
Classical (P256) No 54,367 108.7 78 86 96 102 129 137 145
Hybrid post-quantum (X25519MLKEM768) No 53,106 106.2 76 85 93 100 126 134 141
Classical (P256) Yes 108,052 216.1 181 194 200 216 233 240 245
Hybrid post-quantum (X25519MLKEM768) Yes 107,994 216 177 194 200 216 233 239 245

Removing support for draft post-quantum standards

AWS service endpoints with support for CRYSTALS-Kyber, the predecessor of ML-KEM, will continue to support CRYSTALS-Kyber through 2025. We will slowly phase out support for the pre-standard CRYSTALS-Kyber implementations after customers have moved to the ML-KEM standard. Customers using previous versions of the AWS SDK for Java with CRYSTALS-Kyber support should upgrade to the latest SDK versions that have ML-KEM support. No code changes are necessary for customers using a generally available release of the AWS SDK for Java v2 to upgrade from CRYSTALS-Kyber to ML-KEM.

Customers currently negotiating CRYSTALS-Kyber who do not upgrade their AWS Java SDK v2 clients by 2026 will see their clients gracefully fall back to a classical key agreement once CRYSTALS-Kyber is removed from AWS service HTTPS endpoints.

How to use hybrid post-quantum key agreement

If using the AWS SDK for Rust, you can enable the hybrid post-quantum key agreement by adding the rustls package to your crate and enabling the prefer-post-quantum feature flag. See the rustls documentation for more information.

If using the AWS SDK for Java 2.x, you can enable hybrid post-quantum key agreement by calling .postQuantumTlsEnabled(true) when building your AWS Common Runtime HTTP client.

Step 1: Add the AWS Common Runtime HTTP client to your Java dependencies.

Add the AWS Common Runtime HTTP client to your Maven dependencies. We recommend using the latest available version. Use version 2.30.22 or greater to enable the use of ML-KEM.

<dependency>
    <groupId>software.amazon.awssdk</groupId>
    <artifactId>aws-crt-client</artifactId>
    <version>2.30.22<version>
</dependency>

Step 2: Enable post-quantum TLS in your Java SDK client configuration

When configuring your AWS service client, use the AwsCrtAsyncHttpClient configured with post-quantum TLS.

// Configure an AWS Common Runtime HTTP client with Post-Quantum TLS enabled
SdkAsyncHttpClient awsCrtHttpClient = AwsCrtAsyncHttpClient.builder()
          .postQuantumTlsEnabled(true)
          .build();

// Create an AWS service client that uses the AWS Common Runtime client
KmsAsyncClient kmsAsync = KmsAsyncClient.builder()
         .httpClient(awsCrtHttpClient)
         .build();

// Make a request over a TLS connection that uses post-quantum key agreement
ListKeysReponse keys = kmsAsync.listKeys().get();

See the KMS PQ TLS example application for an end-to-end example of a post-quantum TLS setup.

Things to try

Here are some ideas about how to use this post-quantum-enabled client:

  • Run load tests and benchmarks. The AwsCrtAsyncHttpClient is heavily optimized for performance and uses AWS Libcrypto on Linux-based environments. If you aren’t already using the AwsCrtAsyncHttpClient, try it today to see the performance benefits compared to the default SDK HTTP client. After using AwsCrtAsyncHttpClient, enable post-quantum TLS support. See if using AwsCrtAsyncHttpClient with post-quantum TLS is an overall performance gain to using the default SDK HTTP client without post-quantum TLS.
  • Try connecting from different network locations. Depending on the network path that your request takes, you might discover that intermediate hosts, proxies, or firewalls with deep packet inspection (DPI) block the request. If this is the case, you might need to work with your security team or IT administrators to update firewalls in your network to unblock these new TLS algorithms. We want to hear from you about how your infrastructure interacts with this new variant of TLS traffic.

Conclusion

Support for ML-KEM-based hybrid key agreement has been deployed to three security-critical AWS service endpoints. The performance impact of enabling hybrid post-quantum TLS is likely to be negligible when TLS connection reuse is enabled. Our measurements showed only a 0.05 percent decrease to maximum transactions per second when calling AWS KMS GenerateDataKey.

Starting with version 2.30.22, the AWS SDK for Java v2 now supports ML-KEM-based hybrid key agreement on Linux-based platforms when using the AWS Common Runtime HTTP client. Try enabling post quantum key agreement for TLS in your Java SDK client configuration today.

AWS plans to deploy support for ML-KEM-based hybrid post-quantum key agreement to every AWS service HTTPS endpoint over the coming years as part of our post-quantum cryptography migration plan. AWS customers will be responsible for updating their TLS clients and SDKs to help ensure that ML-KEM key agreement is offered when connecting to AWS service HTTPS endpoints. This will protect against future harvest now, decrypt later threats posed by quantum computing advancements.

For additional information, blog posts, and periodic updates on our post-quantum cryptography migration, keep watching the AWS Post-Quantum Cryptography page. To learn more about post-quantum cryptography with AWS, contact the post-quantum cryptography team.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, start a new thread on the AWS Security, Identity, & Compliance re:Post or contact AWS Support.

Additional resources:

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.

Author

Alex Weibel

Alex is a Senior Software Development Engineer in AWS Cryptography. He’s a contributor to the Amazon TLS Library s2n-tls, the Amazon Corretto Crypto Provider (ACCP), and AWS Libcrypto (AWS-LC). Previously, Alex worked on TLS termination and HTTP request proxying for Amazon S3 and Elastic Load Balancing, developing new features for customers. Alex holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from the University of Texas at Austin.

Automate the Creation & Rotation of Amazon Simple Email Service SMTP Credentials

Post Syndicated from Zip Zieper original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/automate-the-creation-rotation-of-amazon-simple-email-service-smtp-credentials/

[Amazon Simple Email Service] provides a secure email solution that scales with your business needs. Unfortunately, all email systems, including Amazon SES, remain the primary target for spammers and bad actors due to email’s widespread use and accessibility.

While SES offers powerful features for application-based email sending, its SMTP credentials require careful management to prevent unauthorized access. Compromised credentials enable bad actors to send malicious emails through legitimate domains, which can bypass security filters and damage sender reputation.

To protect your SES implementation, you must encrypt SMTP credentials during storage and transmission. Additionally, implementing role-based access controls helps restrict credential access to authorized personnel only. Regular credential rotation at fixed intervals, typically every 90 days, minimizes potential security breaches. Automating this rotation process eliminates human error and ensures consistent security practices across your organization.

Problem Statement

Imagine you are the administrator for a large financial institution. You recently began using Amazon SES to send email from two dozen on-premises servers. Your email servers authenticate with SES using SMTP credentials to access the SES SMTP interface. Your organization’s security policies mandate regular credential rotation, including the ability to rotate them on-demand. How can you automate SMTP credential rotation such that you can meet your organization’s security policies?

This blog post will present two solutions that automate the secure management and automatic rotation of SMTP credentials for Amazon SES. Each will help enhance email security, comply with regulations, and minimize operational overhead.

Both solutions provide SES customers who use SMTP with additional tools to improve email security, ensure compliance, and reduce operational overhead. You can deploy the option that best suites your needs by following the guidance in this blog post.

If your environment supports automated rotation, AWS Systems Manager Documents (SSM Documents) can help by providing pre-defined or custom automation workflows for securely managing secrets rotation, deploy Option 1.

If your environment does not support automated rotation, you can still implement an auditable, managed rotation solution by storing your secrets in AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store by deploying Option 2.

As a pay-per-use platform, the underlying AWS services used in either deployment option will only charge you for the resources that you actually consume. You can leverage the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate the run-time costs for your specific workload. Alternatively, you can work directly with your AWS account team to understand the pricing for these solutions.

Getting SES SMTP Credentials

To send emails through the Amazon SES SMTP interface, email servers must first authenticate with SES using dedicated SES SMTP credentials. Typically, a systems administrator logs into the AWS SES console, clicks the Create SMTP Credentials button, and navigates to the AWS Identity and Access Management] (IAM) console. There, the administrator creates an IAM user with permissions for SES. The administrator then uses the IAM user’s secret access key to generate the SES SMTP password, which they use to configure their email servers or SMTP-enabled applications for use with SES.

Multiple SMTP Credentials

The SES SMTP interface authenticates requests using an SMTP credential derived from an IAM user’s access key ID and secret access key. Since temporary access keys cannot be used to derive SES SMTP credentials, you must deploy and regularly rotate a long-lived key.

While the manual process of creating SES SMTP credentials works for a small number of credentials, it becomes cumbersome for customers with numerous email servers or strict password rotation policies. These customers may find the automated credential rotation mechanisms described in the following solutions better suited to their production needs.

Option 1 – Fully Automated Credential Rotation:

The fully automated version of this solution uses a custom Lambda function to create an SMTP password, which is stored in AWS Secrets Manager. AWS Secrets Manager’s built-in rotation feature then triggers the rotation of SES SMTP credentials. AWS Systems Manager Documents utilize AWS Systems Manager Agents to automatically make the changes to the authentication configuration on email servers.

The key advantages of using AWS Systems Manager to make the email server configuration changes include:

  • Ability to deploy changes to on-premises and Amazon EC2 hosts, allowing rotation of secrets across a hybrid estate.
    Customization of the document to specific email software configurations.
    Targeting the secret (SMTP credential) rotation document on all email servers based on tags.

Let’s dive deep into Option 1 – Fully Automated Credential Rotation.

Option 1 - Fully Automated Credential Rotation

How Option 1 works:

Refer to the image above for the workflow:

  1. AWS Secrets Manager initiates a rotation request, either on a schedule or via an authorized user’s request, triggering the “rotation Lambda” to rotate the SES SMTP credentials.
  2. The SES Secret Rotation Function Lambda (see figure x above):
    • a. Creates a new IAM secret access key for the designated SES IAM user, derives the new SES SMTP password, and stores it in AWS Secrets Manager.
    • b. Connects to SES to verify the new SMTP password can authenticate.
    • c. Initiates an AWS Systems Manager Run Command to update the new SMTP password on target email servers using a pre-configured Systems Manager Document.
    • d. (and e.) Monitors the status of the Systems Manager Document execution until all updates complete successfully
    • f. Deletes the old IAM access and secret access keys.

With this fully automated solution, SES SMTP credentials can be rotated on a schedule or triggered manually, with no impact to email service uptime.

Deploying the Fully Automated Solution in Your AWS Account (Option 1)

Prerequisites for the Fully Automated Solution

  1. AWS Account Access, typically with admin-level permission to allow for the deployment.
  2. Your preferred IDE with AWS CLI version 2 and named profile setup.
    • Alternatively, you can use the AWS CLI from the AWS CloudShell in your browser.
  3. Clone the Github repository (for this solution, you only need the README.md and sesautomaticrotation.yaml files found in /ses-credential-rotation/automatic-rotation).
    • git clone -b ses-credential-rotation https://github.com/aws-samples/serverless-mail.git
    • Note – We follow the principles of least privilege in this solution. The CloudFormation templates we’ve supplied require you to specify an identity, or configuration-set resource to use in the SES sending operation. You can find guidance on defining these values at Actions, resources, and condition keys for Amazon SES. Additionally, we’ve limited the IAM User to the ses:SendRawEmail action, which you can adjust as appropriate).
  4. Console access to your AWS SES account that is properly configured to send emails via at least one verified identity.
  5. Target email server(s) properly configured to send email via SES using SES SMTP authentication.
    • The AWS Systems Manager agent(s) must be correctly installed and configured on your target email server(s) as detailed in Setting up AWS Systems Manager.
    • The target email servers must be decorated with the tag (“SSMServerTag“) and value (“SSMServerTagValue“). These values allow the Systems Manager Document to identify them.
      • We use the tag “EmailServer” and the value “True” in our example, but you can use any tag and value that you wish).
  6. An email address (or list) to receive SMTP rotation notifications.
  7. Console access to your AWS Secrets Manager.
  8. Console access to your AWS Systems Manager.

Deployment Steps

  1. Clone the GitHub repository to your IDE
    • If using AWS CloudShell, ensure you are in the same region as your AWS Systems and Secrets Manager
    • run: git clone https://github.com/aws-samples/serverless-mail.git
    • Navigate to the directory ses-credential-rotation/automatic-rotation
  2. Follow the steps in README.md to
    • Create a S3 bucket to deploy the CloudFormation Template.
    • Package the Lambda functions and upload them to Amazon S3.
    • Deploy the Cloud Formation Template.
    • Update the appropriate AWS Systems Manager sample document created by the CloudFormation Template to reflect your email server environments. These can be found in the AWS Systems Manager console under Documents > Owned by me
      • The ExampleWindowsIISSMTPSESpasswordrotator sample provides an example for Microsoft Windows hosts using the runPowerShellScript action to update the server’s SMTP credentials.
      • The ExamplePostfixSESpasswordrotator sample provides an example for Linux hosts using the runShellScript action to update the server’s SMTP credentials.

Testing Option 1 – Fully Automated Credential Rotation

To test the Fully Automated Credential Rotation solution, have Secrets Manager perform an immediate rotation by following these steps:

  1. Open AWS Secrets Manager console
  2. Locate the secret SESSendSecret
  3. Select the Rotation tab
  4. Click the “Rotate Secret immediately” button.

You can track the progress of the rotation by locating the logs of the Lambda that is deployed to manage the rotation.

  1. In the AWS console, go to CloudFormationStack’s Resources tab
  2. Find the LogicalID = SESSecretRotationFunction
  3. Click the PhysicalID link to open the Lambda
  4. Under the Monitor Tab, select the “View CloudWatch logs” button in the top right
  5. The logs should show the rotation flow through 4 stages below (more details of each stage are available here):
    1. create_secret
    2. set_secret
    3. test_secret
    4. finish_secret

Option 2 – Partially Automated Credential Rotation:

The partially automated version uses a custom AWS Lambda function to create an SMTP password, which is stored in AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store. This solution simplifies credential rotation, where manual changes must be conducted by support staff. By wrapping the manual change process with AWS Step Functions, you can ensure a robust and auditable process to regularly rotate the SES SMTP credential.

How Option 2 works:

  1. The credential rotation AWS Step Function creates a new SES SMTP credential and updates it in AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store.
  2. It retrieves a list of servers from an Amazon DynamoDB table and launches a manual confirmation AWS Step Function execution for each server to initiate and track the manual step.
  3. The manual confirmation AWS Step Function emails the designated address, requesting support staff to arrange the rotation. The email includes a link specific to that server.
  4. The person completing the manual change confirms back to the AWS Step Function via the link that the rotation is complete.
  5. Once the rotation on a server is confirmed, the manual confirmation AWS Step Function for that server is marked as complete.
  6. After all server rotations are complete, the credential rotation AWS Step Function continues, disabling the old SES SMTP credential and deleting it after a few days.

AWS Step Function executions can last up to 365 days, providing sufficient time for the manual rotation and confirmation.

The screenshot below shows a graphical representation of the credential rotation AWS Step Function execution status, providing a real-time view of the rotation progress.

SMTP credential rotation AWS Step Function

You can also track the status of individual servers via the manual rotation step function execution list.

SMTP manual rotation step function execution list

The partially automated solution for rotating Amazon SES SMTP credentials is illustrated and detailed below:

Option 2 - partially automated solution

Refer to the image above for the option 2 workflow:

  1. EventBridge Scheduler Trigger: An EventBridge scheduler rule triggers a custom Starter Function Lambda (SF Lambda) on the last day of every 3rd month (this can be adjusted to suit your needs in the CloudFormation template).
  2. Credential Rotation Step Function: The Starter Function Lambda triggers the Credential Rotation AWS Step Function, providing a clearly defined name to facilitate auditing (“password-rotation-dd-mm-yy“).
  3. Credential Rotation Step Function Actions:
    1. Creates a new IAM (Identity and Access Management) secret access key for the SES IAM user.
    2. Triggers the SMTP Credential Generator Lambda to derive the SES SMTP password from the newly created IAM secret access key (using the algorithm provided in the SES documentation.
    3. Stores the new SES SMTP credential in AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store.
    4. Reads a list of servers that are utilizing this credential from a DynamoDB table.
  4. Manual Confirmation Step Function:
    1. For each server, a manual confirmation AWS Step Function is triggered, sending a message on the Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) topic.
    2. The SNS notification prompts the server administrator via email to manually rotate the SMTP credentials on the on-premises email server.
    3. The server administrator uses a link in the email to confirm the credential has been rotated and tested on the server.
    4. The link triggers the Confirmation Lambda exposed via API Gateway, which marks the ManualConfirmation step function as complete.
  5. Credential Rotation Completion: The CredentialRotation step function waits until all manual confirmation step functions have completed before proceeding.
  6. Old IAM Access Key Deletion: Once confirmation has been received for all servers, the step function deletes the old IAM access key.

Deployment

To deploy the partially automated solution in your AWS account, you will need the following prerequisites:

Prerequisites for the Partially Automated Solution

  1. AWS Account Access, typically with admin-level permission to allow for the deployment.
  2. Your preferred IDE with AWS CLI version 2 and named profile setup. Alternatively, you can use the AWS CLI from the AWS CloudShell in your browser.
  3. SES enabled, configured, and properly sending emails.
  4. External email server(s) currently configured to use SES with SMTP.
  5. Administrator email address to receive notifications.
  6. AWS Secrets Manager and AWS Systems Manager set up.
  7. AWS Systems Manager agent(s) correctly installed and configured on your target email servers as detailed in Setting up AWS Systems Manager.
  8. Amazon EC2 instance with Postfix configured to send emails through SES
  9. Target email servers must be decorated with a tag (“SSMServerTag“) and value (“SSMServerTagValue“) that will be used to identify them by the Systems Manager Document (we used “server” and “email”)
  10. AWS Parameter Store and AWS Step Functions.

Once you have the prerequisites in place, follow the instructions in the GitHub project.

Conclusion

Implementing an automated credential rotation process for Amazon SES SMTP enhances security and compliance, streamlines operations, and reduces the risk of downtime and human error. By leveraging AWS Secrets Manager and AWS Systems Manager (option 1) or AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store and Step Functions (option 2), organizations can centralize SES SMTP credential management, maintain an audit trail, and quickly update email application servers with new SMTP credentials.

Need additional guidance?

Announcing ASCP integration with Pod Identity: Enhanced security for secrets management in Amazon EKS

Post Syndicated from Rodrigo Bersa original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/announcing-ascp-integration-with-pod-identity-enhanced-security-for-secrets-management-in-amazon-eks/

In 2021, Amazon Web Services (AWS) introduced the AWS Secrets and Configuration Provider (ASCP) for the Kubernetes Secrets Store Container Storage Interface (CSI) Driver, offering a reliable way to manage secrets in Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS). Today, we’re excited to announce the integration of ASCP with Pod Identity, the new standard for AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) integration with Amazon EKS. This integration provides enhanced security, simplified configuration, and improved Day-2 operation for applications running on EKS that need access to secrets stored in AWS Secrets Manager and AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store. In this post, we’ll cover use-case scenarios for single and cross-account secrets using Pod Identity integration with ASCP.

Amazon EKS introduced Pod Identity in 2023 as a feature that streamlines the process of configuring IAM permissions for Kubernetes applications. Pod Identity simplifies the identity management of applications running on top of Amazon EKS by allowing you to set up permissions directly through EKS interfaces, reducing the number of steps required and alleviating the need to switch between the EKS and IAM services. Pod Identity enables the use of a single IAM role across multiple clusters without updating trust policies, and it supports role session tags for more granular access control. This approach not only simplifies policy management by allowing the reuse of permission policies across roles, but also enhances security by enabling access to AWS resources based on matching tags.

Background

When your applications that are running on top of Amazon EKS require sensitive information like credentials to access a database, or a key to authenticate through an API, we call this kind of information secrets. You can secure, store, and manage secrets in AWS Secrets Manager. ASCP allows Kubernetes applications to securely retrieve the secrets stored in Secrets Manager and Systems Manager Parameter Store. Previously, ASCP relied on IAM roles for service accounts (IRSA) for authentication. Although IRSA provided improvements over previous methods, Pod Identity offers even greater security and simplicity.

Pod Identity provides a more secure and efficient way to integrate IAM roles with applications running on EKS, granting more granular AWS permissions to individual Pods, so that you don’t need instance-level credentials or IRSA.

This integration provides the following key benefits over using IRSA:

  • Enhanced security: Pod Identity provides a more granular and secure way to manage permissions at the Pod level, alleviating the need to expose the IAM role annotation on Kubernetes ServiceAccount objects.
  • Simplified configuration:Pod Identity streamlines and simplifies the setup process, reducing the potential for misconfiguration, especially in high-scale environments.
  • Improved operation: Pod Identity reduces the operational overhead compared to previous methods, centralizing the management with the AWS API.
  • Native EKS integration: Pod Identity is the new standard for IAM integration for applications running on EKS and provides a more cohesive experience.

Solution overview

With this integration, ASCP uses Pod Identity to authenticate and authorize access to AWS services. When a Pod requires access to a secret, the workflow is as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: The workflow performed by the Pod Identity and ASCP integration to provide access to a secret stored on AWS Secrets Manager for a Pod running on Amazon EKS

Figure 1: The workflow performed by the Pod Identity and ASCP integration to provide access to a secret stored on AWS Secrets Manager for a Pod running on Amazon EKS

The workflow is as follows:

  1. A user creates an IAM role and a Pod Identity association between the IAM role and the Kubernetes ServiceAccount assigned to the Pod.
  2. EKS API validates the Pod Identity association, allowing ASCP to use this role to authenticate with AWS services.
  3. If authorized, the Pod Identity agent allows ASCP to assume the IAM role assigned to the Pod through the use of a ServiceAccount token.
  4. The Pod retrieves the requested secrets values and makes them available to the Pod through the use of a mounted volume.

Prerequisites

You need to have the following prerequisites in place in order to implement this solution:

Implement the solution

This guide presents two scenarios: single-account setup and cross-account setup. Complete the single-account steps in Account A before proceeding to the cross-account configuration, which involves Account B. The cross-account setup builds on the single-account foundation to demonstrate secure secrets management across AWS accounts.

Amazon EKS cluster setup

Before you start, you’ll need to set up an Amazon EKS cluster with the required add-ons in a single account (Account A).

  1. (Optional) Use the following commands to set environment variables and create an Amazon EKS cluster:
    export CLUSTER_NAME=<YOUR_CLUSTER_NAME>
    export AWS_REGION=<YOUR_AWS_REGION>
    export NAMESPACE=<YOUR_NAMESPACE>
    export ACCOUNT_A=<ACCOUNT_ID_1>
    export ACCOUNT_B=<ACCOUNT_ID_2>
    export SECRET_NAME=<NAME_OF_YOUR_SECRET>
    export SECRET_NAME_CROSS=<NAME_OF_YOUR_CROSS_SECRET>

    Here are the environment variables for this demonstration:

    export CLUSTER_NAME=ascp-podidentity
    export SECRET_NAME=secret-a
    export AWS_REGION=$(aws configure get region)
    export NAMESPACE=default
    export SECRET_NAME=secret-a
    export SECRET_NAME_CROSS=secret-b

    Create the EKS cluster:

    eksctl create cluster —name $CLUSTER_NAME —version=1.31

  2. Update your kubeconfig file to enable Pod Identity on your EKS cluster (if it’s not already enabled):
    eksctl create addon --cluster $CLUSTER_NAME --name eks-pod-identity-agent

  3. Install the Secrets Store CSI driver:
    aws eks --region $AWS_REGION update-kubeconfig --name $CLUSTER_NAME
    helm repo add secrets-store-csi-driver https://kubernetes-sigs.github.io/secrets-store-csi-driver/charts
    helm install -n kube-system csi-secrets-store secrets-store-csi-driver/secrets-store-csi-driver

  4. Verify the Secrets Store CSI Driver installation:
    kubectl --namespace=kube-system get pods -l "app=secrets-store-csi-driver"

    You should see this expected output:

    NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
    csi-secrets-store-secrets-store-csi-driver-fcxf6 3/3 Running 0 41s
    csi-secrets-store-secrets-store-csi-driver-j9wqh 3/3 Running 0 41s

  5. Install the ASCP plugin:
    kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aws/secrets-store-csi-driver-provider-aws/main/deployment/aws-provider-installer.yaml

Consuming secrets in a single account

Now that you’ve set up your Amazon EKS cluster, in this use case, you’ll create an AWS Secrets Manager secret in the same account where the cluster and the applications reside (Account A).

  1. Create a secret in AWS Secrets Manager with tags kubernetes-namespace and eks-cluster-name within the same AWS account as the EKS cluster:
    aws secretsmanager create-secret --region $AWS_REGION \
    --name $SECRET_NAME \
    --tags Key=kubernetes-namespace,Value=$NAMESPACE Key=eks-cluster-name,Value=$CLUSTER_NAME \
    --secret-string "{"user":"user1","password":"passwd1"}"

    You should see this expected output:

    {
    "ARN": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:$AWS_REGION:$ACCOUNT_A:secret:dummy-secret-q1w2e3",
    "Name": "secret-a",
    "VersionId": "abcdefgh-1234-5678-ijklmnopqrst"
    }

    Note the Amazon Resource Name (ARN) of the new secret. You will use it in the next step.

  2. Create an IAM role and trust policy with the required permissions to retrieve the newly created secret within the same AWS account:
    SECRET_ARN=< NOTED_SECRET_ARN_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>
    cat << EOF > policy.json
    {
        "Version": "2012-10-17",
        "Statement": [
            {
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Action": ["secretsmanager:GetSecretValue", "secretsmanager:DescribeSecret"],
                "Resource": ["$SECRET_ARN"],
                "Condition": {
                    "StringEquals": {
                        "secretsmanager:ResourceTag/kubernetes-namespace": "\${aws:PrincipalTag/kubernetes-namespace}",
                        "secretsmanager:ResourceTag/eks-cluster-name": "\${aws:PrincipalTag/eks-cluster-name}"
                    }
                }
            }
        ]
    }
    EOF

    In the preceding example IAM role permission policy, the use of conditions with kubernetes-namespace and eks-cluster-name tags helps enforce fine-grained access control by specifying that secrets can only be accessed by Pods from specific namespace and clusters. This allows secretsmanager actions only if the secret is tagged with the matching kubernetes-namespace and  eks-cluster-name values.

    cat << EOF > trust.json
    {
        "Version": "2012-10-17",
        "Statement": [
            {  
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Principal": {
                    "Service": "pods.eks.amazonaws.com" 
                },
                "Action": [
                    "sts:AssumeRole",
                    "sts:TagSession"
                ]
            }
        ]
    }
    EOF

    Notice that the preceding example IAM role trust policy allows the Amazon EKS Pod Identity service (pods.eks.amazonaws.com) to assume the role and tag the session. These actions are necessary for Pod Identity to function correctly, enabling Pods to securely access AWS resources.

    Finally, apply the role and trust policy:

    aws iam create-role --role-name ascp-podidentity --assume-role-policy-document file://trust.json
    aws iam put-role-policy --role-name ascp-podidentity --policy-name ascp-podidentity --policy-document file://policy.json

    Note the ARN of the new role. You will use it in the next step.

  3. Create a Kubernetes ServiceAccount and add the Pod Identity association between the ServiceAccount and the IAM role:
    ROLE_ARN=<NOTED_ROLE_ARN_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>
    kubectl create serviceaccount serviceaccount-a
    
    aws eks create-pod-identity-association \
    --cluster-name "$CLUSTER_NAME" \
    --namespace "default" \
    --service-account serviceaccount-a \
    --role-arn $ROLE_ARN

  4. Create a SecretProviderClass to use the newly created secret in your Amazon EKS cluster.
    cat << EOF | kubectl apply -f -
    
    apiVersion: secrets-store.csi.x-k8s.io/v1
    kind: SecretProviderClass
    metadata:
      name: aws-secrets-manager
    spec:
      provider: aws
      parameters:
        objects: |
          - objectName: "secret-a" # Secret name or ARN to be mounted to the Pod
            objectType: "secretsmanager"
        usePodIdentity: "true" # Indicator to use Pod Identity instead of IRSA
        
    EOF

  5. Create a new deployment to consume your newly created secret using Pod Identity as a mounted volume.
    cat << EOF | kubectl apply -f -
    
    apiVersion: apps/v1
    kind: Deployment
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: application-a
      name: application-a
    spec:
      replicas: 1
      selector:
        matchLabels:
          app: application-a
      template:
        metadata:
          labels:
            app: application-a
        spec:
          containers:
          - image: public.ecr.aws/amazonlinux/amazonlinux:2023-minimal
            name: amazonlinux
            args:
            - infinity
            command:
            - sleep
     volumeMounts:
     - name: secrets-store-inline
     mountPath: "/mnt/secret" # Directory where secret will be mounted to
     readOnly: true
     volumes:
     - name: secrets-store-inline
     csi:
     driver: secrets-store.csi.k8s.io
     readOnly: true
     volumeAttributes:
     secretProviderClass: "aws-secrets-manager" # Match SecretProviderClass name created
     serviceAccountName: serviceaccount-a # Specify service account created
    
    EOF

  6. Validate that the deployment was created successfully and confirm the secret was mounted correctly.
    kubectl get pods -l app=application-a
    kubectl exec -it $(kubectl get pods -l app=application-a -o name) -- cat /mnt/secret/secret-a

    You should see this expected output:

    NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
    application-a-b98d44bb8-bzvn4 1/1 Running 0 3s
    
    {"user":"user1","password":"passwd1"}%

Working with cross-account secrets through resource policies

For this second use case, you’ll also use the Amazon EKS cluster on Account A, and create a new Secrets Manager secret in a different account (Account B).

In order to access a secret in a different account, you can’t use the default AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) key, but will use aws/secretsmanager to encrypt this secret. So you need to first create a new AWS KMS key that allows cross-account access.

On Account B

  1. Create a customer managed key on AWS KMS with cross-account permissions:
    cat < key-policy.json
    {
      "Version": "2012-10-17",
      "Id": "cross-account-access",
      "Statement": [
        {
          "Sid": "Enable IAM User Permissions",
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::${ACCOUNT_B}:root"
          },
          "Action": "kms:*",
          "Resource": "arn:aws:kms:${AWS_REGION}:${ACCOUNT_B}:key/*"
        },
        {
          "Sid": "Allow access for Key Administrators",
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::${ACCOUNT_B}:role/Admin"
          },
          "Action": [
            "kms:Create",
            "kms:Describe",
            "kms:Enable",
            "kms:List",
            "kms:Put",
            "kms:Update",
            "kms:Revoke",
            "kms:Disable",
            "kms:Get",
            "kms:Delete",
            "kms:TagResource",
            "kms:UntagResource",
            "kms:ScheduleKeyDeletion",
            "kms:CancelKeyDeletion",
            "kms:RotateKeyOnDemand"
          ],
          "Resource": "arn:aws:kms:${AWS_REGION}:${ACCOUNT_B}:key/*"
        },
        {
          "Sid": "Allow access through AWS Secrets Manager",
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": "*"
          },
          "Action": [
            "kms:Encrypt",
            "kms:Decrypt",
            "kms:ReEncrypt",
            "kms:CreateGrant",
            "kms:DescribeKey"
          ],
          "Resource": "arn:aws:kms:${AWS_REGION}:${ACCOUNT_B}:key/*",
          "Condition": {
            "StringEquals": {
              "kms:ViaService": "secretsmanager.${AWS_REGION}.amazonaws.com",
              "kms:CallerAccount": [
                "$ACCOUNT_A",
                "$ACCOUNT_B"
              ]
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "Sid": "Allow access through AWS Secrets Manager for Generate Data Key",
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": "*"
          },
          "Action": "kms:GenerateDataKey",
          "Resource": "arn:aws:kms:${AWS_REGION}:${ACCOUNT_B}:key/*",
          "Condition": {
            "StringEquals": {
              "kms:CallerAccount": [
                "$ACCOUNT_A",
                "$ACCOUNT_B"
              ]
            },
            "StringLike": {
              "kms:ViaService": "secretsmanager.${AWS_REGION}.amazonaws.com"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "Sid": "Allow direct access to key metadata to the account",
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": [
              "arn:aws:iam::${ACCOUNT_A}:root",
              "arn:aws:iam::${ACCOUNT_B}:root"
            ]
          },
          "Action": [
            "kms:Describe",
            "kms:Get",
            "kms:List",
            "kms:RevokeGrant"
          ],
          "Resource": "arn:aws:kms:${AWS_REGION}:${ACCOUNT_B}:key/*"
        }
      ]
    }
    EOF

    Then create the KMS key:

    $ aws kms create key --region $AWS_REGION --policy file://key-policy.json

    You should see this expected output:

    {
        "KeyMetadata": {
            "AWSAccountId": "$ACCOUNT_B",
            "KeyId": "abcdefgh-1234-5678-90ij-klmnopqrstuv",
            "Arn": "arn:aws:kms:${AWS_REGION}:${ACCOUNT_B}:key/abcdefgh-1234-5678-90ij-klmnopqrstuv",
            "CreationDate": "2025-01-23T18:00:00.756000-05:00",
            "Enabled": true,
            "Description": "",
            "KeyUsage": "ENCRYPT_DECRYPT",
            "KeyState": "Enabled",
            "Origin": "AWS_KMS",
            "KeyManager": "CUSTOMER",
            "CustomerMasterKeySpec": "SYMMETRIC_DEFAULT",
            "KeySpec": "SYMMETRIC_DEFAULT",
            "EncryptionAlgorithms": [
                "SYMMETRIC_DEFAULT"
            ],
            "MultiRegion": false
        }
    }

    Take note of the KeyID and the ARN of the key. You can use it to create an alias for the newly created key:

    KEY_ID=<NOTED_KEY_ID_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>
    aws kms create-alias --region $AWS_REGION —-alias-name alias/secretsmanager-cross —-target-key-id $KEY_ID

  2. Create a new secret in Secrets Manager, using the new KMS key to encrypt it:
    aws secretsmanager create-secret --region $AWS_REGION \
    --name $SECRET_NAME_CROSS \
    --tags Key=kubernetes-namespace,Value=$NAMESPACE Key=eks-cluster-name,Value=$CLUSTER_NAME \
    --secret-string "This is a Cross Account Secret" \
    --kms-key-id $KEY_ID

    You should see this expected output:

    {
    "ARN": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:$AWS_REGION:$ACCOUNT_B:secret:secret-b-12345",
    "Name": "secret-b",
    "VersionId": "abcdefgh-1234-5678-ijklmnopqrst"
    }

    Note the ARN of the new secret. You will use it in the next step.

  3. Add a resource policy that allows the IAM role on Account A to access the newly created secret:
    SECRET_CROSS_ARN=< NOTED_SECRET_CROSS_ARN_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>
    cat << EOF > resource-policy.json
    
    {
      "Version" : "2012-10-17",
      "Statement" : [ {
        "Effect" : "Allow",
        "Principal" : {
          "AWS" : "arn:aws:iam::${ACCOUNT_A}:root"
        },
        "Action" : [ "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue", "secretsmanager:DescribeSecret" ],
        "Resource" : "$SECRET_CROSS_ARN"
        } 
      ]
    }
    
    EOF
    aws secretsmanager put-resource-policy --secret-id $SECRET_NAME_CROSS --resource-policy file://resource-policy.json

Now let’s go back to Account A.

On Account A

  1. Create a new IAM role and trust policy with the required permissions to retrieve the newly created secret within Account B:
    KEY_ARN=< NOTED_KEY_ARN_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>
    cat << EOF > cross-policy.json
    {
        "Version": "2012-10-17",
        "Statement": [
            {
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Action": ["secretsmanager:GetSecretValue", "secretsmanager:DescribeSecret"],
                "Resource": ["$SECRET_CROSS_ARN"],
                "Condition": {
                    "StringEquals": {
                        "secretsmanager:ResourceTag/kubernetes-namespace": "\${aws:PrincipalTag/kubernetes-namespace}",
                        "secretsmanager:ResourceTag/eks-cluster-name": "\${aws:PrincipalTag/eks-cluster-name}"
                    }
                }
            },
            {
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Action": [
                    "kms:Decrypt",
                    "kms:DescribeKey"
                    ],
                "Resource": "$KEY_ARN"
            }
        ]
    }
    EOF

    In the preceding example IAM role permission policy, note that the resource ARN is pointing to the secret created on Account B.

    cat << EOF > trust.json
    {
        "Version": "2012-10-17",
        "Statement": [
            {  
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Principal": {
                    "Service": "pods.eks.amazonaws.com" 
                },
                "Action": [
                    "sts:AssumeRole",
                    "sts:TagSession"
                ]
            }
        ]
    }
    EOF

    The IAM role trust policy needs to have pods.eks.amazonaws.com as a trusted entity to perform the sts:AssumeRole and sts:TagSession actions.

    Next, create the role and apply the policy:

    aws iam create-role --role-name ascp-podidentity-cross --assume-role-policy-document file://trust.json
    aws iam put-role-policy --role-name ascp-podidentity-cross --policy-name ascp-podidentity-cross --policy-document file://cross-policy.json

    Note the ARN of the new role. You will use it in the next step.

  2. Create the second Kubernetes ServiceAccount and add the cross-account Pod Identity association:
    kubectl create serviceaccount serviceaccount-b
    
    ROLE_CROSS_ARN=<NOTED_ROLE_CROSS_ARN_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>
    aws eks create-pod-identity-association \
    --cluster-name "$CLUSTER_NAME" \
    --namespace "default" \
    --service-account serviceaccount-b \
    --role-arn $ROLE_CROSS_ARN

  3. Create a SecretProviderClass to use the cross-account secret created in Account B in your Amazon EKS cluster:
    cat << EOF | kubectl apply -f -
    
    apiVersion: secrets-store.csi.x-k8s.io/v1
    kind: SecretProviderClass
    metadata:
      name: aws-secrets-manager-cross
    spec:
      provider: aws
      parameters:
        objects: |
          - objectName: "$SECRET_CROSS_ARN" # Full ARN of the Secret in the ACCOUNT B to be mounted on Pod
            objectType: "secretsmanager"
        usePodIdentity: "true" # Indicator to use Pod Identity instead of IRSA
        
    EOF

  4. Create a new deployment to consume your newly created secret using Pod Identity as a mounted volume:
    cat << EOF | kubectl apply -f -
    
    apiVersion: apps/v1
    kind: Deployment
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: application-b
      name: application-b
    spec:
      replicas: 1
      selector:
        matchLabels:
          app: application-b
      template:
        metadata:
          labels:
            app: application-b
        spec:
          containers:
          - image: public.ecr.aws/amazonlinux/amazonlinux:2023-minimal
            name: amazonlinux
            args:
            - infinity
            command:
            - sleep
     volumeMounts:
     - name: secrets-store-cross
     mountPath: "/mnt/secret" # Directory where secret will be mounted to readOnly: true
     volumes:
     - name: secrets-store-cross
     csi:
     driver: secrets-store.csi.k8s.io
     readOnly: true
     volumeAttributes:
     secretProviderClass: "aws-secrets-manager-cross" # Match SecretProviderClass name created for cross-account access serviceAccountName: serviceaccount-b # Specify service account created for cross-account access
    
    EOF

  5. Validate that the deployment was created successfully and confirm the mounted secret:
    kubectl get pods -l app=application-b
    kubectl exec -it $(kubectl get pods -l app=application-b -o name) -- cat /mnt/secret/$SECRET_CROSS_ARN

    Note that the volume name is the secret ARN, because it’s a cross-account secret.

    You should see this expected output:

    NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
    application-b-67b755444f-ngrhv 1/1 Running 0 8s
    
    "This is a Cross Account Secret"%

Conclusion

The integration of ASCP with Pod Identity marks a significant step forward in secrets management for Amazon EKS. It offers enhanced security, simplified configuration, and improved operations. We encourage all EKS users to explore this new integration and take advantage of its benefits.

The integration of ASCP with Pod Identity offers these benefits over IRSA:

  1. Simplified setup: With Pod Identity, you don’t need to create and manage service accounts for each application.
  2. Enhanced security: Pod Identity provides more granular control over permissions at the Pod level.
  3. Improved scalability: Pod Identity is easier to implement in large-scale environments.
  4. Consistent AWS experience: Pod Identity aligns more closely with AWS best practices for IAM management.

For more information, see our documentation for: AWS Secrets Manager, AWS Secrets CSI Store Provider (ASCP), and Amazon EKS Pod Identity.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Rodrigo Bersa
Rodrigo Bersa

Rodrigo is a Senior Specialist Solutions Architect for Containers and AppMod, with a focus on security and infrastructure-as-code automation. In this role, Rodrigo aims to help customers achieve their business goals by leveraging best practices for AWS container services when building new environments or migrating existing technologies.
Akshay Aggarwal
Akshay Aggarwal

Akshay is a Senior Technical Product Manager on the AWS Secrets Manager team. As part of the AWS Cryptography team, Akshay drives technologies and defines best practices that help improve customers’ experiences of building secure, reliable workloads in the AWS Cloud. Akshay is passionate about building technologies that are easy to use, secure, and scalable.
Stephanie Shen
Stephanie Shen

Stephanie Shen is a Software Development Engineer at Amazon Web Services (AWS), working on the AWS Security Services team. She has over 8 years of experience, previously working as a Product Manager. Stephanie aims to help customers improve their security posture by enhancing the features on AWS security services.

Introducing an enhanced version of the AWS Secrets Manager transform: AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16

Post Syndicated from Sanjay Varma Datla original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/introducing-an-enhanced-version-of-the-aws-secrets-manager-transform-awssecretsmanager-2024-09-16/

We’re pleased to announce an enhanced version of the AWS Secrets Manager transform: AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16. This update is designed to simplify infrastructure management by reducing the need for manual security updates, bug fixes, and runtime upgrades.

AWS Secrets Manager helps you manage, retrieve, and rotate database credentials, API keys, and other secrets throughout their lifecycles. Some AWS services offer managed rotation of secrets, but for other secrets, you perform rotation by using an AWS Lambda function that updates your secret and the database or service.

Transforms are macros hosted by AWS CloudFormation that enable you to create or manage complex infrastructure setups. For general information on transforms, see the AWS CloudFormation documentation.

The AWS::SecretsManager transforms are used in conjunction with the AWS::SecretsManager::RotationSchedule resource type and HostedRotationLambda property to automatically extend your CloudFormation template to include a nested stack that creates the appropriate rotation Lambda function for your database or service. The transforms provide a convenient way to deploy an AWS vended rotation Lambda function into your own account as part of your CloudFormation templates, without having to rely on creating rotation Lambda functions through the AWS Serverless Application Repository or the AWS Management Console.

In this post, we’ll explore the new features of the transform, compare them to the previous version, and guide you through updating an existing Lambda function that was created using the old transform version to use the new transform version.

New features in AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16

The new transform version introduces several enhancements over the previous version (AWS::SecretsManager-2020-07-23):

  • Automatic Lambda upgrades: Your rotation Lambda functions’ runtime configuration and internal dependencies now update automatically when you update your CloudFormation stacks. This helps you verify that you’re using the most secure and stable versions of Secrets Manager vended rotation Lambda function code and runtimes. Currently, AWS Lambda supports Python runtimes 3.9 and above. With Python 3.8 being deprecated, this feature allows for a seamless transition to newer supported runtimes. For more information on runtime deprecations, see the AWS Lambda runtimes documentation and the Python version guide.
  • Additional resource attributes: The new transform now supports additional resource attributes for the AWS::SecretsManager::RotationSchedule resource type when used with the HostedRotationLambda property. The following attributes are applied to the nested stack (of type AWS::CloudFormation::Stack) that creates the rotation Lambda function:
    • CreationPolicy
    • DependsOn
    • Metadata
    • UpdatePolicy
    • Condition

For more information on these resource attributes, see the AWS CloudFormation resource attribute reference.

Resource attributes comparison

The following table shows which resource attributes are supported by the two versions of the Secrets Manager transform.

Attribute AWS::SecretsManager-2020-07-23 AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16
DeletionPolicy Supported Supported
UpdateReplacePolicy Supported Supported
CreationPolicy Not Supported Supported
DependsOn Not Supported Supported
Metadata Not Supported Supported
UpdatePolicy Not Supported Supported
Condition Not Supported Supported

Important considerations

Before you use the AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16 transform, it’s essential to be aware of the following considerations so that you can make sure your CloudFormation stacks are properly created or updated:

  • Non-backward compatibility: The new transform version isn’t backward compatible with the previous version. If you downgrade from AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16 to AWS::SecretsManager-2020-07-23, the additional resource attributes won’t be supported, which might change the behavior of existing stacks.
  • Rollback behavior during upgrade: When you upgrade to the AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16 transform from the previous version and a stack rollback occurs for any reason, the rotation Lambda function might not revert to its previous state. This is because the older transform’s nested stack might not use the same Lambda deployment package that was used before the upgrade.
  • Direct Lambda changes: If you make direct changes to the Lambda function created by the new transform outside of a CloudFormation stack update, those modifications might be overwritten during subsequent CloudFormation stack updates or rollbacks.
  • Lambda runtime management: When you use the new transform version, the rotation Lambda function’s runtime aligns with the compiled binaries that are vended in Secrets Manager rotation Lambda templates, without you needing to specify a Runtime value in the HostedRotationLambda property. If you specify a Runtime value, make sure it’s the same version that is supported by Secrets Manager vended rotation Lambda templates. Otherwise, the Lambda runtime will be incompatible with the binaries that are published in the rotation Lambda function. For more information on the supported runtime, see the rotation function templates documentation.
  • End of support plans: AWS Secrets Manager will end support for the previous transform version (AWS::SecretsManager-2020-07-23) in the future. We recommend that you migrate your stacks to the new transform to benefit from improvements and security enhancements going forward.

How to upgrade

To upgrade to the new transform version, follow these steps:

  1. Review your existing CloudFormation stacks that use the AWS::SecretsManager-2020-07-23 transform.
  2. Update your CloudFormation stack templates to use AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16 in the Transform key at the top of your template: Transform: AWS::SecretsManager-2024-09-16
  3. If you have previously defined a Runtime value in the HostedRotationLambda property, remove it from your template so that your rotation Lambda function’s runtime is updated properly in future stack updates.
  4. Incorporate the new resource attributes as needed. We recommend that you minimize all other template changes while upgrading to reduce the likelihood of rollbacks.
  5. Deploy the changes by updating your CloudFormation stack with the revised template.

By following these steps, your Secrets Manager vended rotation Lambda functions will benefit from the latest improvements and security enhancements. Remember to test the changes in a non-production environment before you apply them to your production stacks. If you encounter any issues during the upgrade process, refer to our documentation or contact AWS Support for assistance.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Sanjay Varma Datla
Sanjay Varma Datla

Sanjay is a Software Development Engineer at AWS Secrets Manager. With a strong background in software engineering and a passion for secure application design, he focuses on empowering developers to manage sensitive information safely. Outside of work, Sanjay enjoys hiking and exploring new cuisines.
Rob Stevens
Rob Stevens

Rob is a System Development Engineer for AWS Secrets Manager and is committed to building secure and scalable distributed systems for AWS and its customers. Outside of work, Rob is a fitness enthusiast and also enjoys traveling.

Making sense of secrets management on Amazon EKS for regulated institutions

Post Syndicated from Piyush Mattoo original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/making-sense-of-secrets-management-on-amazon-eks-for-regulated-institutions/

Amazon Web Services (AWS) customers operating in a regulated industry, such as the financial services industry (FSI) or healthcare, are required to meet their regulatory and compliance obligations, such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) or Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA).

AWS offers regulated customers tools, guidance and third-party audit reports to help meet compliance requirements. Regulated industry customers often require a service-by-service approval process when adopting cloud services to make sure that each adopted service aligns with their regulatory obligations and risk tolerance. How financial institutions can approve AWS services for highly confidential data walks through the key considerations that customers should focus on to help streamline the approval of cloud services. In this post we cover how regulated customers, especially FSI customers, can approach secrets management on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) to help meet data protection and operational security requirements. Amazon EKS gives you the flexibility to start, run, and scale Kubernetes applications in the AWS Cloud or on-premises.

Applications often require sensitive information such as passwords, API keys, and tokens to connect to external services or systems. Kubernetes has secrets objects for managing these types of sensitive information. Additional tools and approaches have evolved to supplement the Kubernetes Secrets to help meet the compliance requirements of regulated organizations. One of the driving forces behind the evolution of these tools for regulated customers is that the native Kubernetes Secrets values aren’t encrypted but encoded as base64 strings; meaning that their values can be decoded by a threat actor with either API access or authorization to create a pod in a namespace containing the secret. There are options such as GoDaddy Kubernetes External Secrets, AWS Secrets and Configuration Provider (ASCP) for the Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver, Hashicorp Vault, and Bitnami Sealed secrets that you can use to can help to improve the security, management, and audibility of your secrets usage.

In this post, we cover some of the key decisions involved in choosing between External Secrets Operator (ESO), Sealed Secrets, and ASCP for the Kubernetes Secrets Store Container Storage Interface (CSI) Driver, specifically for FSI customers with regulatory demands. These decision points are also broadly applicable to customers operating in other regulated industries.

AWS Shared Responsibility Model

Security and compliance is a shared responsibility between AWS and the customer. The AWS Shared Responsibility Model describes this as security of the cloud and security in the cloud:

  • AWS responsibility – Security of the cloud: AWS is responsible for protecting the infrastructure that runs the services offered in the AWS Cloud. For Amazon EKS, AWS is responsible for the Kubernetes control plane, which includes the control plane nodes and etcd database. Amazon EKS is certified by multiple compliance programs for regulated and sensitive applications. The effectiveness of the security controls are regularly tested and verified by third-party auditors as part of the AWS compliance programs.
  • Customer responsibility – Security in the cloud: Customers are responsible for the security and compliance of customer configured systems and services deployed on AWS. This includes responsibility for securely deploying, configuring and managing ESO within their Amazon EKS cluster. For Amazon EKS, the customer responsibility depends upon the worker nodes you pick to run your workloads and cluster configuration as shown in Figure 1. In the case of Amazon EKS deployment using Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) hosts, the customer responsibility includes the following areas:
    • The security configuration of the data plane, including the configuration of the security groups that allow traffic to pass from the Amazon EKS control plane into the customer virtual private cloud (VPC).
    • The configuration of the nodes and the containers themselves.
    • The nodes’ operating system, including updates and security patches.
    • Other associated application software:
    • The sensitivity of your data, such as personally identifiable information (PII), keys, passwords, and tokens
      • Customers are responsible for enforcing access controls to protect their data and secrets.
      • Customers are responsible for monitoring and logging activities related to secrets management including auditing access, detecting anomalies and responding to security incidents.
    • Your company’s requirements, applicable laws and regulations
    • When using AWS Fargate, the operational overhead for customers is reduced in the following areas:
      • The customer is not responsible for updating or patching the host system.
      • Fargate manages the placement and scaling of containers.
Figure 1: AWS Shared Responsibility Model with Fargate and Amazon EC2 based workflows

Figure 1: AWS Shared Responsibility Model with Fargate and Amazon EC2 based workflows

As an example of the Shared Responsibility Model in action, consider a typical FSI workload accepting or processing payments cards and subject to PCI DSS requirements. PCI DSS v4.0 requirement 3 focuses on guidelines to secure cardholder data while at rest and in transit:

Control ID Control description
3.6 Cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data are secured.
3.6.1.2 Store secret and private keys used to encrypt and decrypt cardholder data in one (or more) of the following forms:

  • Encrypted with a key-encrypting key that is at least as strong as the data-encrypting key, and that is stored separately from the data-encrypting key.
  • Stored within a secure cryptographic device (SCD), such as a hardware security module (HSM) or PTS-approved point-of-interaction device.
  • Has at least two full-length key components or key shares, in accordance with an industry-accepted method. Note: It is not required that public keys be stored in one of these forms.
3.6.1.3 Access to cleartext cryptographic key components is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.

NIST frameworks and controls are also broadly adopted by FSI customers. NIST Cyber Security Framework (NIST CSF) and NIST SP 800-53 (Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations) include the following controls that apply to secrets:

Regulation or framework Control ID Control description
NIST CSF PR.AC-1 Identities and credentials are issued, managed, verified, revoked, and audited for authorized devices, users and processes.
NIST CSF PR.DS-1 Data-at-rest is protected.
NIST 800-53.r5 AC-2(1)
AC-3(15)
Secrets should have automatic rotation enabled.
Delete unused secrets.

Based on the preceding objectives, the management of secrets can be categorized into two broad areas:

  • Identity and access management ensures separation of duties and least privileged access.
  • Strong encryption, using a dedicated cryptographic device, introduces a secure boundary between the secrets data and keys, while maintaining appropriate management over the cryptographic keys.

Choosing your secrets management provider

To help choose a secrets management provider and apply compensating controls effectively, in this section we evaluate three different options based on the key objectives derived from the PCI DSS and NIST controls described above and other considerations such as operational overhead, high availability, resiliency, and developer or operator experience.

Architecture and workflow

The following architecture and component descriptions highlight the different architectural approaches and responsibilities of each solution’s components, ranging from controllers and operators, command-line interface (CLI) tools, custom resources, and CSI drivers working together to facilitate secure secrets management within Kubernetes environments.

External Secrets Operator (ESO) extends the Kubernetes API using a custom resource definition (CRD) for secret retrieval. ESO enables integration with external secrets management systems such as AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Google Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, IBM Cloud Secrets Manager, and various other systems. ESO watches for changes to an external secret store and keeps Kubernetes secrets in sync. These services offer features that aren’t available with native Kubernetes Secrets, such as fine-grained access controls, strong encryption, and automatic rotation of secrets. By using these purpose-built tools outside of a Kubernetes cluster, you can better manage risk and benefit from central management of secrets across multiple Amazon EKS clusters. For more information, see the detailed walkthrough of using ESO to synchronize secrets from Secrets Manager to your Amazon EKS Fargate cluster.

ESO is comprised of a cluster-side controller that automatically reconciles the state within the Kubernetes cluster and updates the related secrets anytime the external API’s secret undergoes a change.

Figure 2: ESO workflow

Figure 2: ESO workflow

Sealed Secrets is an open source project by Bitnami comprised of a Kubernetes controller coupled with a client-side CLI tool with the objective to store secrets in Git in a secure fashion. Sealed Secrets encrypts your Kubernetes secret into a SealedSecret, which can also be deployed to a Kubernetes cluster using kubectl. For more information, see the detailed walkthough of using tools from the Sealed Secrets open source project to manage secrets in your Amazon EKS clusters.

Sealed Secrets comprises of three main components: First, there is an operator or a controller which is deployed onto a Kubernetes cluster. The controller is responsible for decrypting your secrets. Second, you have a CLI tool called Kubeseal that takes your secret and encrypts it. Third, you have a CRD. Instead of creating regular secrets, you create SealedSecrets, which is a CRD defined within Kubernetes. That is how the operator knows when to perform the decryption process within your Kubernetes cluster.

Upon startup, the controller looks for a cluster-wide private-public key pair and generates a new 4096-bit RSA public-private key pair if one doesn’t exist. The private key is persisted in a secret object in the same namespace as the controller. The public key portion of this is made publicly available to anyone wanting to use Sealed Secrets with this cluster.

Figure 3: Sealed Secrets workflow

Figure 3: Sealed Secrets workflow

The AWS Secrets Manager and Config Provider (ASCP) for Secret Store CSI driver is an open source tool from AWS that allows secrets from Secrets Manager and Parameter Store, a capability of AWS Systems Manager, to be mounted as files inside Amazon EKS pods. It uses a CRD called SecretProviderClass to specify which secrets or parameters to mount. Upon a pod start or restart, the CSI driver retrieves the secrets or parameters from AWS and writes them to a tmpfs volume mounted in the pod. The volume is automatically cleaned up when the pod is deleted, making sure that secrets aren’t persisted. For more information, see the detailed walkthrough on how to set up and configure the ASCP to work with Amazon EKS.

ASCP comprises of a cluster-side controller acting as the provider, allowing secrets from Secrets Manager, and parameters from Parameter Store to appear as files mounted in Kubernetes pods. Secrets Store CSI Driver is a DaemonSet with three containers: node-driver-registrar, which registers the CSI driver with Kubelet; secrets-store, which implements the CSI Node service gRPC services for mounting and unmounting volumes during pod creation and deletion; and  liveness-probe, which monitors the health of the CSI driver and reports to Kubernetes for automatic issue detection and pod restart.

Figure 4: AWS Secrets Manager and configuration provider

Figure 4: AWS Secrets Manager and configuration provider

In the next section, we cover some of the key decisions involved in choosing whether to use ESO, Sealed Secrets, or ASCP for regulated customers to help meet their regulatory and compliance needs.

Comparing ESO, Sealed Secrets, and ASCP objectives

All three solutions address different aspects of secure secrets management and aim to help FSI customers meet their regulatory compliance requirements while upholding the protection of sensitive data in Kubernetes environments.

ESO synchronizes secrets from external APIs into Kubernetes, targeting the cluster operator and application developer personas. The cluster operator is responsible for setting up ESO and managing access policies. The application developer is responsible for defining external secrets and the application configuration.

Sealed Secrets encrypts your Kubernetes secrets before storing them in version control systems such as public Git repositories. This is the case if you decide to check in your Kubernetes manifest to a Git repository granting access to your sensitive secrets to anyone who has access to the Git repository. This is ultimately the reason why Sealed Secrets was created and the sealed secret can be decrypted only by the controller running in the target cluster.

Using ASCP, you can securely store and manage your secrets in Secrets Manager and retrieve them through your applications running on Kubernetes without having to write custom code. Secrets Manager provides features such as rotation, auditing, and access control that can help FSI customers meet regulatory compliance requirements and maintain a robust security posture.

Installation

The deployment and configuration details that follow highlight the different approaches and resources used by each solution to integrate with Kubernetes and external secret stores, catering to the specific requirements of secure secrets management in containerized environments.

ESO provides Helm charts for ease of operator deployment. External Secrets provides custom resources like SecretStore and ExternalSecret for configuring the required operator functionality to synchronize external secrets to your cluster. For instance, SecretStore can be used by the cluster operator to be able to connect to AWS Secrets Manager using appropriate credentials to pull in the secrets.

To install Sealed Secrets, you can deploy the Sealed Secrets Controller onto the Kubernetes cluster. You can deploy the manifest by itself or you can use a Helm chart to deploy the Sealed Secrets Controller for you. After the controller is installed, you use the Kubeseal client-side utility to encrypt secrets using asymmetric cryptography. If you don’t already have the Kubeseal CLI installed, see the installation instructions.

ASCP provides Helm charts to assist in operator deployment. The ASCP operator provides custom resources such as SecretProviderClass to provide provider-specific parameters to the CSI driver. During pod start and restart, the CSI driver will communicate with the provider using gRPC to retrieve the secret content from the external secret store you specified in the SecretProviderClass custom resource. Then the volume is mounted in the pod as tmpfs and the secret contents are written to the volume.

Encryption and key management

These solutions use robust encryption mechanisms and key management practices provided by external secret stores and AWS services such as AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) and Secrets Manager. However, additional considerations and configurations might be required to meet specific regulatory requirements, such as PCI DSS compliance for handling sensitive data.

ESO relies on encryption features within the external secrets management system. For instance, Secrets Manager supports envelope encryption with AWS KMS which is FIPS 140-2 Level 3 certified. Secrets Manager has several compliance certifications making it a great fit for regulated workloads. FIPS 140-2 Level 3 ensures only strong encryption algorithms approved by NIST can be used to protect data. It also defines security requirements for the cryptographic module, creating logical and physical boundaries.

Both AWS KMS and Secrets Manager help you to manage key lifecycle and to integrate with other AWS Services. In terms of key rotation, both provide automatic rotation of secrets that runs on a schedule (which you define), and abstract the complexity of managing different versions of keys. For AWS managed keys, the key rotation happens automatically once every year by default. With customer managed keys (CMKs), automatic key rotation is available but not enabled by default.

When using SealedSecrets, you use the Kubeseal tool to convert a standard Kubernetes Secret into a Sealed Secrets resource. The contents of the Sealed Secrets are encrypted with the public key served by the Sealed Secrets Controller as described in the Sealed Secrets project homepage.

In the absence of cloud native secrets management integration, you might have to add compensating controls to achieve the regulatory standards required by your organization. In cases where the underlying SealedSecrets data is sensitive in nature, such as cardholder PII, PCI requires that you store sensitive secrets in a cryptographic device such as a hardware security module (HSM). You can use Secrets Manager to store the master key generated to seal the secrets. However, this you will have to enable additional integration with Amazon EKS APIs to fetch the master key securely from the EKS cluster. You will also have to modify your deployment process to use a master key from Secrets Manager. The applications running in the EKS cluster must have permissions to fetch the SealedSecret and master key from Secrets Manager. This might involve configuring the application to interact with Amazon EKS APIs and Secrets Manager. For non-sensitive data, Kubeseal can be used directly within the EKS cluster to manage secrets and sealing keys.

For key rotation, you can store the controller generated private key in Parameter Store as a SecureString. You can use the advanced tier in Parameter Store if the file containing the private keys exceeds the Standard tier limit of up to 4,096 characters. In addition, if you want to add key rotation, you can use AWS KMS.

The ASCP relies on encryption features within the chosen secret store, such as Secrets Manager. Secrets Manager supports integration with AWS KMS for an additional layer of security by storing encryption keys separately. The Secrets Store CSI Driver facilitates secure interaction with the secret store, but doesn’t directly encrypt secrets. Encrypting mounted content can provide further protection, but introduces operational overhead related to key management.

ASCP relies on Secrets Manager and AWS KMS for encryption and decryption capabilities. As a recommendation, you can encrypt mounted content to further protect the secrets. However, this introduces the additional operational overhead of managing encryption keys and addressing key rotation.

Additional considerations

These solutions address various aspects of secure secrets management, ranging from centralized management, compliance, high availability, performance, developer experience, and integration with existing investments, catering to the specific needs of FSI customers in their Kubernetes environments.

ESO can be particularly useful when you need to manage an identical set of secrets across multiple Kubernetes clusters. Instead of configuring, managing, and rotating secrets at each cluster level individually, you can synchronize your secrets across your clusters. This simplifies secrets management by providing a single interface to manage secrets across multiple clusters and environments.

External secrets management systems typically offer advanced security features such as encryption at rest, access controls, audit logs, and integration with identity providers. This helps FSI customers ensure that sensitive information is stored and managed securely in accordance with regulatory requirements.

FSI customers usually have existing investments in their on-premises or cloud infrastructure, including secrets management solutions. ESO integrates seamlessly with existing secrets management systems and infrastructure, allowing FSI customers to use their investment in these systems without requiring significant changes to their workflow or tooling. This makes it easier for FSI customers to adopt and integrate ESO into their existing Kubernetes environments.

ESO provides capabilities for enforcing policies and governance controls around secrets management such as access control, rotation policies, and audit logging when using services like Secrets Manager. For FSI customers, audits and compliance are critical and ESO verifies that access to secrets is tracked and audit trails are maintained, thereby simplifying the process of demonstrating adherence to regulatory standards. For instance, secrets stored inside Secrets Manager can be audited for compliance with AWS Config and AWS Audit Manager. Additionally, ESO uses role-based access control (RBAC) to help prevent unauthorized access to Kubernetes secrets as documented in the ESO security best practices guide.

High availability and resilience are critical considerations for mission critical FSI applications such as online banking, payment processing, and trading services. By using external secrets management systems designed for high availability and disaster recovery, ESO helps FSI customers ensure secrets are available and accessible in the event of infrastructure failure or outages, thereby minimizing service disruption and downtime.

FSI workloads often experience spikes in transaction volumes, especially during peak days or hours. ESO is designed to efficiently managed a large volume of secrets by using external secrets management that’s optimized for performance and scalability.

In terms of monitoring, ESO provides Prometheus metrics to enable fine-grained monitoring of access to secrets. Amazon EKS pods offer diverse methods to grant access to secrets present on external secrets management solutions. For example, in non-production environments, access can be granted through IAM instance profiles assigned to the Amazon EKS worker nodes. For production, using IAM roles for service accounts (IRSA) is recommended. Furthermore, you can achieve namespace level fine-grained access control by using annotations.

ESO also provides options to configure operators to use a VPC endpoint to comply with FIPS requirements.

Additional developer productivity benefits provided by ESO include support for JSON objects (Secret key/value in the AWS Management console) or strings (Plaintext in the console). With JSON objects, developers can programmatically update multiple values atomically when rotating a client certificate and private key.

The benefit of Sealed Secrets, as discussed previously, is when you upload your manifest to a Git repository. The manifest will contain the encrypted SealedSecrets and not the regular secrets. This assures that no one has access to your sensitive secrets even when they have access to your Git repository. Sealed Secrets offer a few benefits to developers in terms of developer experience. Sealed Secrets gives you access to manage your secrets, making them more readily available to developers. Sealed Secrets offers VSCode extension to assist in integrating it into the software development lifecycle (SDLC). Using Sealed Secrets, you can store the encrypted secrets in the version control systems such as Gitlab and GitHub. Sealed Secrets can reduce operational overhead related to updating dependent objects because whenever a secret resource is updated, the same update is applied to the dependent objects.

ASCP integration with the Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver on Amazon EKS offers enhanced security through seamless integration with Secrets Manager and Parameter Store, ensuring encryption, access control, and auditing. It centralizes management of sensitive data, simplifying operations and reducing the risk of exposure. The dynamic secrets injection capability facilitates secure retrieval and injection of secrets into Kubernetes pods, while automatic rotation provides up-to-date credentials without manual intervention. This combined solution streamlines deployment and management, providing a secure, scalable, and efficient approach to handling secrets and configuration settings in Kubernetes applications.

Consolidated threat model

We created a threat model based on the architecture of the three solution offerings. The threat model provides a comprehensive view of the potential threats and corresponding mitigations for each solution, allowing organizations to proactively address security risks and ensure the secure management of secrets in their Kubernetes environments.

X = Mitigations applicable to the solution

Threat Mitigations ESO Sealed Secrets ASCP
Unauthorized access or modification of secrets
  • Implement least privilege access principles
  • Rotate and manage credentials securely
  • Enable RBAC and auditing in Kubernetes
X X X
Insider threat (for example, a rogue administrator who has legitimate access)
  • Implement least privilege access principles
  • Enable auditing and monitoring
  • Enforce separation of duties and job rotation
X X
Compromise of the deployment process
  • Secure and harden the deployment pipeline
  • Implement secure coding practices
  • Enable auditing and monitoring
X
Unauthorized access or tampering of secrets during transit
  • Enable encryption in transit using TLS
  • Implement mutual TLS authentication between components
  • Use private networking or VPN for secure communication
X X X
Compromise of the Kubernetes API server because of vulnerabilities or misconfiguration
  • Secure and harden the Kubernetes API server
  • Enable authentication and authorization mechanisms (for example, mutual TLS and RBAC)
  • Keep Kubernetes components up-to-date and patched
  • Enable Kubernetes audit logging and monitoring
X
Vulnerability in the external secrets controller leading to privilege escalation or data exposure
  • Keep the external secrets controller up-to-date and patched
  • Regularly monitor for and apply security updates
  • Implement least privilege access principles
  • Enable auditing and monitoring
X
Compromise of the Secrets Store CSI Driver, node-driver-registrar, Secrets Store CSI Provider, kubelet, or Pod could lead to unauthorized access or exposure of secrets
  • Implement least privilege principles and role-based access controls
  • Regularly patch and update the components
  • Monitor and audit the component activities
X
Unauthorized access or data breach in Secrets Manager could expose sensitive secrets
  • Implement strong access controls and access logging for Secrets Manager
  • Encrypt secrets at rest and in transit
  • Regularly rotate and update secrets
X X

Shortcomings and limitations

The following limitations and drawbacks highlight the importance of carefully evaluating the specific requirements and constraints of your organization before adopting any of these solutions. You should consider factors such as team expertise, deployment environments, integration needs, and compliance requirements to promote a secure and efficient secrets management solution that aligns with your organization’s needs.

ESO doesn’t include a default way to restrict network traffic to and from ESO using network policies or similar network or firewall mechanisms. The application team is responsible for properly configuring network policies to improve the overall security posture of ESO within your Kubernetes cluster.

Any time an external secret associated with ESO is rotated, you must restart the deployment that uses that particular external secret. Given the inherent risks associated with integrating an external entity or third-party solution into your system, including ESO, it’s crucial to implement a comprehensive threat model similar to the Kubernetes Admission Control Threat Model.

Also, ESO set up is complicated and the controller must be installed on the Kubernetes cluster.

SealedSecrets cannot be reused across namespaces unless they’re re-encrypted or made cluster-wide, which makes it challenging to manage secrets across multiple namespaces consistently. The need to manually rotate and re-encrypt SealedSecrets with new keys can introduce operational overhead, especially in large-scale environments with numerous secrets. The old sealing keys pose a potential risk of misuse by unauthorized users, which increases the risk. To mitigate both risks (high overhead and old secrets), you should implement additional controls such as deleting older keys as part of the key rotation process or periodically rotate sealing keys and make sure that old sealed secret resources are re-encrypted with the new keys. Sealed Secrets doesn’t support external secret stores such as HashiCorp Vault, or cloud provider services such as Secrets Manager, Parameter Store, or Azure Key Vault. Sealed Secrets requires a Kubeseal client-side binary to encrypt secrets. This can be a concern in FSI environments where client-side tools are restricted by security policies.

While ASCP provides seamless integration with Secrets Manager and Parameter Store, teams unfamiliar with these AWS services might need to invest some additional effort to fully realize the benefits. This additional effort is justified by the long-term benefits of centralized secrets management and access control provided by these services. Additionally, relying primarily on AWS services for secrets management can potentially limit flexibility in deploying to alternative cloud providers or on-premises environments in the future. These factors should be carefully evaluated based on the specific needs and constraints of the application and deployment environment.

Conclusion

We have provided a summary of three options for managing secrets in Amazon EKS, ESO, Sealed Secrets, and AWS Secrets and Configuration Provider (ASCP), and the key considerations for FSI customers when choosing between them. The choice depends on several factors including existing investments in secrets management systems, specific security needs and compliance requirements, preference for a Kubernetes native solution or willingness to accept vendor lock-in.

The guidance provided here covers the strengths, limitations, and trade-offs of each option, allowing regulated institutions to make an informed decision based on their unique requirements and constraints. This guidance can be adapted and tailored to fit the specific needs of an organization, providing a secure and efficient secrets management solution for their Amazon EKS workloads, while aligning with the stringent security and compliance standards of the regulated institutions.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Piyush Mattoo

Piyush Mattoo
Piyush is a Senior Solution Architect for Financial Services Data Provider segment at Amazon Web Services. He is a software technology leader with over a decade long experience building scalable and distributed software systems to enable business value through the use of technology. He is based out of Southern California and current interests include outdoor camping and nature walks.

Ruy Cavalcanti

Ruy Cavalcanti
Ruy is a Senior Security Architect for the Latin American Financial market at AWS. He has been working in IT and Security for over 19 years, helping customers create secure architectures in the AWS Cloud. Ruy’s interests include jamming on his guitar, firing up the grill for some Brazilian-style barbecue, and enjoying quality time with his family and friends.

Chetan Pawar

Chetan Pawar
Chetan is a Cloud Architect specializing in infrastructure within AWS Professional Services. As a member of the Containers Technical Field Community, he provides strategic guidance on enterprise Infrastructure and DevOps for clients across multiple industries. He has an 18-year track record building large-scale Infrastructure and containerized platforms. Outside of work, he is an avid traveler and motorsport enthusiast.

How to centrally manage secrets with AWS Secrets Manager

Post Syndicated from Shagun Beniwal original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-centrally-manage-secrets-with-aws-secrets-manager/

In today’s digital landscape, managing secrets, such as passwords, API keys, tokens, and other credentials, has become a critical task for organizations. For some Amazon Web Services (AWS) customers, centralized management of secrets can be a robust and efficient solution to address this challenge. In this post, we delve into using AWS data protection services such as AWS Secrets Manager and AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) to help make secrets management easier in your environment by centrally managing them from a designated AWS account.

Centralized secrets management involves the consolidation of sensitive information into a single, secure repository. This repository acts as a centralized vault where secrets are stored, accessed, and managed with strict security controls. Centralizing secrets can help organizations enforce uniform security policies, streamline access control, and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access or leakage.

This approach offers several key benefits. First, it can enhance security by reducing the threat surface and providing a single point of control for managing access to sensitive information. Additionally, centralized secrets management can facilitate compliance with regulatory requirements by enforcing strict access controls and audit trails.

Furthermore, centralization promotes efficiency and scalability by enabling automated workflows for secret rotation, provisioning, and revocation. This automation reduces administrative tasks and minimizes the risk of human error, enhancing overall operational excellence.

Overview

In this post, we’ll walk you through how to set up a centralized account for managing your secrets and their lifecycle by using AWS Lambda rotation functions. Furthermore, to facilitate efficient access and management across multiple member accounts, we’ll discuss how to establish tunnelling through VPC peering to enable seamless communication between the Centralized Security Account in this architecture and the associated member accounts.

Notably, applications within the member accounts will directly access the secrets stored in the Centralized Security Account through the use of resource policies, streamlining the retrieval process. Additionally, using AWS provided DNS within the Centralized Security Account’s virtual private cloud (VPC) will automate the resolution of database host addresses to their respective control plane IP addresses. This functionality allows AWS Lambda function traffic to efficiently traverse the peering connection, enhancing overall system performance and reliability.

Figure 1 shows the solution architecture. The architecture has four accounts that are managed through AWS Organizations. Out of these four accounts, there are three workload accounts designated as Account A, Account B, and Account C that host the application and database for serving user requests, and a Centralized Security Account from which the secrets will be maintained and managed. VPC 1 from every workload account (Account A, Account B, and Account C) is peered with VPC 1 (part of the Centralized Security Account) to allow communication between workload accounts and the secrets management account. For high availability, secrets are also replicated to a different AWS Region.

Figure 1: Sample solution architecture for centrally managing secrets

Figure 1: Sample solution architecture for centrally managing secrets

Deploy the solution

Follow the steps in this section to deploy the solution.

Step 1: Create secrets, including database secrets, in your Centralized Security Account

First, create the secrets you want to use for this walkthrough. For example, the database secrets will have a following parameters:

{
    "engine": " sql”,
    "username": " admin ",
    "password": "EXAMPLE-PASSWORD",
    "host": "<cross account DB host URL>",
    "dbInstanceIdentifier": "<cross account DB instance identifier>"
    "port": "3306"
}

To create a database secret (console)

  1. Open the AWS Secrets Manager console in the Centralized Security Account.
  2. Choose Store a new secret.
  3. Choose Credentials for other database and provide the user name and password.

    Figure 2: Create and store a new secret using Secrets Manager

    Figure 2: Create and store a new secret using Secrets Manager

  4. For Encryption key, use the instructions in the AWS KMS documentation to create and choose the AWS KMS key that you want Secrets Manager to use to encrypt the secret value. Because you need to access the secret from another AWS account, make sure you are using an AWS KMS customer managed key (CMK).

    Important: Make sure that you do NOT use aws/secretsmanager, because it is an AWS managed key for Secrets Manager and you cannot modify the key policy.

    Figure 3: Select the encryption key to encrypt the secret created

    Figure 3: Select the encryption key to encrypt the secret created

    AWS Secrets Manager makes it possible for you to replicate secrets across multiple AWS Regions to provide regional access and low-latency requirements. If you turn on rotation for your primary secret, Secrets Manager rotates the secret in the primary Region, and the new secret value propagates to the associated Regions. Rotation of replicated secrets does not have to be individually managed.

    Note: When replicating a secret in Secrets Manager, you have the option to choose between using a multi-Region key (MRK) or an independent KMS key in the Region where the secrets are replicated. Your choice depends on your specific requirements such as operational preferences, regulatory compliance, and ease of management.

  5. For Database, select the database from the list of supported database types displayed and provide the host URL in the server address field, the database name, and the port number. Choose Next.

    Figure 4: Selecting the database and providing the database details

    Figure 4: Selecting the database and providing the database details

  6. For Configure secret, provide a secret name (for example, PostgresAppUser) and optionally add a description and tags. The resource permissions required to access the secret from across accounts will be explained later in this post.

    (Optional) Under Replicate secret, select other Regions and customer managed KMS keys from respective Regions to replicate this secret for high availability purposes, and then choose Next.

  7. The next screen will ask you to configure automatic rotation, but you can skip this step for now because you will create the rotation Lambda function in Step 2. Choose Next and then Store to finish saving the secret.

    Note: Secrets Manager rotation uses a Lambda function to update the secret and the database or service. After the secret is created, you must create a rotation Lambda function separately and attach it to the secret for rotating it. This detailed process is covered in the following steps.

Step 2: Deploy the rotation Lambda function where needed

For secrets that require automatic rotation to be turned on, deploy the rotation Lambda function from the serverless application list.

To deploy the rotation Lambda function

  1. In the Centralized Security Account, open the AWS Lambda console.
  2. In the left navigation menu, choose Applications, and then choose Create application.
  3. Choose Serverless Application and then choose the Public Applications tab.
  4. Make sure you have selected the checkbox for Show apps that create custom IAM roles or resource policies.

    Figure 5: Create a rotation Lambda function in the centralized security account for secret rotation

    Figure 5: Create a rotation Lambda function in the centralized security account for secret rotation

  5. In the search field under Serverless application, search for SecretsManager, and the available functions for rotation will be displayed. Choose the Lambda function based on your DB engine type. For example, if the DB engine type is Postgres SQL, select SecretsManagerRDSPostgreSQLRotationSingleUser from the list by choosing the application name.

    Figure 6: Choosing the AWS provided PostgreSQL rotation function (optionally you may choose a different rotation Lambda function)

    Figure 6: Choosing the AWS provided PostgreSQL rotation function (optionally you may choose a different rotation Lambda function)

  6. On the next page, under Application settings, provide the requested details for the following settings:
    1. functionName (for example, PostgresDBUserRotationLambda)
    2. endpoint – For the SecretsManagerRDSPostgreSQLRotationSingleUser option, in the endpoint field, add https://secretsmanager.us-east-1.amazonaws.com. (Choose the Secrets Manager service endpoint based on the Region where the rotation Lambda is created.)
    3. kmsKeyArn – Used by the secret for encryption.
    4. vpcSecurityGroupIds Provide the security group ID for the rotation Lambda function. Under the outbound rules tab of the security group attached to the rotation Lambda, add the required rules for the Lambda function to communicate with the Secrets Manager service endpoint and database. Also, make sure that the security groups attached to your database or service allow inbound connections from the Lambda rotation function.
    5. vpcSubnetIds – When you provide vpcSubnetIDs, provide subnets of a VPC from the Centralized Security Account where you are planning to deploy your rotation Lambda functions.

    Figure 7: Set up rotation Lambda configuration

    Figure 7: Set up rotation Lambda configuration

  7. Select the checkbox next to I acknowledge that this app creates custom IAM roles and resource policies, and then choose Deploy. This will create the required Lambda function to rotate your secret.
  8. Navigate to the Secrets Manager console and edit the secret to turn on automatic rotation (for instructions, see the Secrets Manager documentation).

    Figure 8: Editing the rotation in the Secrets Manager console

    Figure 8: Editing the rotation in the Secrets Manager console

    Set a rotation schedule according to your organization’s data security strategy.

  9. For Lambda rotation function, select the new Lambda function PostgresDbUserRotationLambda that you created in the previous step to associate it with the secret.

    Figure 9: The rotation configuration settings in the Secrets Manager console

    Figure 9: The rotation configuration settings in the Secrets Manager console

Step 3: Set up networking for Lambda to reach the Secrets Manager service endpoint

To provide connectivity to the Lambda function, you can either deploy a VPC endpoint with Private DNS enabled or a NAT gateway.

Deploy a VPC endpoint with Private DNS enabled

To create an Amazon VPC endpoint for AWS Secrets Manager (recommended)

  1. Open the Amazon VPC console, choose Endpoints, and then choose Create endpoint.
  2. For Service category, select AWS services. In the Service Name list, select the Secrets Manager endpoint service named com.amazonaws.<Region>.secretsmanager.

    Figure 10: Create a VPC endpoint for Secrets Manager

    Figure 10: Create a VPC endpoint for Secrets Manager

  3. For VPC, specify the VPC you want to create the endpoint in. This should be the VPC that you selected for hosting centralized secret rotation using the AWS Lambda function.
  4. To create a VPC endpoint, you need to specify the private IP address range in which the endpoint will be accessible. To do this, select the subnet for each Availability Zone (AZ). This restricts the VPC endpoint to the private IP address range specific to each AZ and also creates an AZ-specific VPC endpoint. Specifying more than one subnet-AZ combination helps improve fault tolerance and make the endpoint accessible from a different AZ in case of an AZ failure.
  5. Select the Enable DNS name checkbox for the VPC endpoint. Private DNS resolves the standard Secrets Manager DNS hostname https://secretsmanager.<Region>.amazonaws.com. to the private IP addresses associated with the VPC endpoint specific DNS hostname.

    Figure 11: Set up VPC endpoint configurations

    Figure 11: Set up VPC endpoint configurations

  6. Associate a security group with this endpoint (for instructions, see the AWS PrivateLink documentation). The security group enables you to control the traffic to the endpoint from resources in your VPC. The attached security group should accept inbound connections from the Lambda function for rotation on port 443.

    Figure 12: Attaching the security group to the VPC endpoint

    Figure 12: Attaching the security group to the VPC endpoint

Create a NAT gateway

Alternatively, you can give your function internet access. Place the function in private subnets and route the outbound traffic to a NAT gateway in a public subnet. The NAT gateway has a public IP address and connects to the internet through the VPC’s internet gateway. To create a NAT gateway, follow the steps described in this AWS re:post article.

Step 4: Deploy VPC peering

Next, deploy VPC peering between the Centralized Security Account and the member accounts that hold the database.

To deploy VPC peering

  1. Open the Amazon VPC console in the Centralized Security Account.
  2. In the left navigation pane, choose Peering connections, and then choose Create peering connection.
  3. Configure the following information, and choose Create peering connection when you are done:
    1. Name – You can optionally name your VPC peering connection, for example central_secret_management_vpc_peer.
    2. VPC ID (Requester) – Select the centralized secret management AWS Lambda VPC in your account with which you want to create the VPC peering connection.
    3. Account – Choose Another account.
    4. Account ID – Enter the ID of the AWS account that owns the database.

      Figure 13: Create VPC peering connection

      Figure 13: Create VPC peering connection

    5. VPC ID (Accepter) – Enter the ID of the database VPC with which to create the VPC peering connection.

      Figure 14: Create VPC peering connection – Entering the VPC ID

      Figure 14: Create VPC peering connection – Entering the VPC ID

  4. From the database account, navigate to the Amazon VPC console. Choose Peering connections and then choose Accept request.

    Figure 15: Accepting the VPC peering request from the database account (Accounts A, B, and C)

    Figure 15: Accepting the VPC peering request from the database account (Accounts A, B, and C)

  5. Add a route to the route tables in both VPCs so that you can send and receive traffic across the peering connection. Each table has a local route and a route that sends traffic for the peer VPC to the VPC peering connection.

    Figure 16: Sample table to show VPC peering connections between the Centralized Security Account and application/database accounts

    Figure 16: Sample table to show VPC peering connections between the Centralized Security Account and application/database accounts

  6. Perform the following steps in the Centralized Security Account:
    1. Open the Amazon VPC console in the Centralized Security Account.
    2. Select the Centralized Security Account Lambda VPC. Under Details, choose Main route table.
    3. Choose Edit routes, and then choose Add routes. Under Destination, add the database VPC CIDR (172.31.0.0/16) in an empty field. Under Target, select the peering connection you created in Step 3.
  7. Perform the following steps in Account 2, where the application/database is hosted:
    1. Open the VPC console in the database account.
    2. Select the Centralized Security Account Lambda VPC and then, under Details, choose Main route table.
    3. Choose Edit routes, and then choose Add routes. Under Destination, add the rotation Lambda VPC CIDR (10.0.0.0/16) in an empty field. Under Target, select the peering connection you created in Step 3.

Step 5: Set up resource-based policies on each secret

After the secrets are deployed into the Centralized Security Account, to allow application roles or users in other accounts to access the secrets (known as cross-account access), you must allow access in both a resource policy and in an identity policy. This is different than granting access to identities in the same account rather than the secret.

To set up resource-based policies on each secret

  1. Attach a resource policy to the secret in the Centralized Security Account by using the following steps:
    1. Open the Secrets Manager console. Remember to choose the Region that is appropriate for your setup.
    2. From the list of secrets, choose your secret.
    3. On the Secret details page, choose the Overview tab.
    4. Under Resource permissions, choose Edit permissions.
    5. In the Code field, attach or append the following resource policy statement, and then choose Save:
    {
      "Version": "2012-10-17",
      "Statement": [
        {
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::<account2-id>:role/ApplicationRole"
          },
          "Action": "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue",
          "Resource": "<ARN of secret to which this policy is attached>"
        }
      ]
    }

  2. Add the following resource policy statement to the key policy for the KMS key in the Centralized Security Account.
    {
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::<account2-id>:role/ApplicationRole"
          },
          "Action": [
            "kms:Decrypt",
            "kms:DescribeKey"
          ],
          "Resource": "<kms-key-resource-arn>"
        }

    If there exists no policy on the key, add the following policy to the key.

    {
      "Version": "2012-10-17",
      "Statement": [
        {
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Principal": {
            "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::<account2-id>:role/ApplicationRole"
          },
          "Action": [
            "kms:Decrypt",
            "kms:DescribeKey"
          ],
          "Resource": "<kms-key-resource-arn>"
        }
      ]
    }

  3. Attach an identity policy to the identity in the accounts where you hosted your applications to provide access to the secret and the KMS key used to encrypt the secret.
    {
      "Version": "2012-10-17",
      "Statement": [
        {
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Action": "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue",
          "Resource": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:<your-region>:<centralized-security-account-id>:secret:<secret-id>"
        },
        {
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Action": "kms:Decrypt",
          "Resource": "arn:aws:kms:<your-region>:<centralized-security-account-id>:key/<key-id>"
        }
      ]
    }

The access policies mentioned here are just for the example in this post. In a production environment, only provide the needed granular permissions by exercising least privilege principles.

What challenges does this solution present, and how can you overcome them?

Along with the advantages discussed in this post, there are a few challenges you should anticipate while deploying this solution:

  1. Currently there is a maximum of 20,480 characters allowed in a resource-based permissions policy attached to a secret. For organizations where a large number of external accounts need to be given access to a secret, you will need to keep this quota in mind.
  2. There is also a limit on the total number of active VPC peering connections per VPC. By default, the limit is 50 connections, but this is adjustable up to 125. If you require more connections across VPCs, you can use other solutions, like a transit gateway, as an alternative.
  3. As the number of applications that require access to secrets from the Centralized Security Account increases, the number of external accesses will also increase, and access control might become difficult over time. To reduce the number of external accounts that have access to the Centralized Security Account, you may choose to use AWS IAM Access Analyzer.

Conclusion

In this post, we provided you with a step-by-step solution to establish a Centralized Security Account that uses the AWS Secrets Manager service for securely storing your secrets in a central place. The post outlined the process of deploying AWS Lambda functions to facilitate automatic rotation of necessary secrets. Furthermore, we delved into the implementation of VPC peering to provide uninterrupted connectivity between the rotation function and your databases or applications housed in different AWS accounts, helping to ensure smooth rotation.

Finally, we discussed the essential policies that are needed to enable applications to use these secrets through resource-based policies. This implementation provides a way for you to conveniently monitor and audit your secrets.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
 

Shagun Beniwal

Shagun Beniwal
Shagun is a Technical Account Manager at AWS. He manages Global System Integrators (GSIs) and Partners operating on AWS Enterprise Support. He is a member of the internal security community with focus areas in threat detection & incident response, infrastructure security, and IAM. Shagun helps customers achieve strategic business outcomes in security, resilience, cost optimization, and operations. You can follow Shagun on LinkedIn.

Navaneeth Krishnan Venugopal

Navaneeth Krishnan Venugopal
Navaneeth is a Cloud Support – Security Engineer II at AWS and an AWS Secrets Manager subject matter expert (SME). He is passionate about cybersecurity and helps provide tailored, secure solutions for a broad spectrum of technical issues faced by customers. Navaneeth has a focus on security and compliance and enjoys helping customers architect secure solutions on AWS.

How to use the AWS Secrets Manager Agent

Post Syndicated from Eduardo Patrocinio original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-use-the-aws-secrets-manager-agent/

AWS Secrets Manager is a service that helps you manage, retrieve, and rotate database credentials, application credentials, OAuth tokens, API keys, and other secrets throughout their lifecycles. You can use Secrets Manager to replace hard-coded credentials in application source code with a runtime call to the Secrets Manager service to retrieve credentials dynamically when you need them. Storing the credentials in Secrets Manager helps to avoid unintended access by anyone who inspects your application’s source code, configuration, or components.

In this blog post, we introduce a new feature, the Secrets Manager Agent, and walk through how you can use it to retrieve Secretes Manager secrets.

New approach: Secrets Manager Agent

Previously, if you had an application that used Secrets Manager and needed to retrieve secrets, you had to use the AWS SDK or one of our existing caching libraries. Both these options are specific to a certain coding language and allow only limited scope for customization.

The Secrets Manager Agent is a client-side agent that allows you to standardize consumption of secrets from Secrets Manager across your AWS compute environments. (AWS has published the code for the agent as open source code.) Secrets Manager Agent pulls and caches secrets in your compute environment and allows your applications to consume secrets directly from the in-memory cache. The Secrets Manager Agent opens a localhost port inside your application environment. With this port, you fetch the secret value from the local agent instead of making network calls to the service. This allows you to improve the overall availability of your application while reducing your API calls. Because the Secrets Manager Agent is language agnostic, you can install the binary file of the agent on many types of AWS compute environments.

Although you can use this feature to retrieve and cache secrets in your application’s compute environment, the access controls for Secrets Manager secrets remain unchanged. This means that AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) principals need the same permissions as if they were to retrieve each of the secrets. You will need to provide GetSecretValue and DescribeSecret permissions to the secrets that you want to consume by using the Secrets Manager Agent.

The Secrets Manager Agent offers protection against server-side request forgery (SSRF). When you install the Secrets Manager Agent, the script generates a random SSRF token on startup and stores it in the file /var/run/awssmatoken. The token is readable by the awssmatokenreader group that the install script creates. The Secrets Manager Agent denies requests that don’t have an SSRF token in the header or that have an invalid SSRF token.

Solution overview

The Secrets Manager Agent provides a language-agnostic way to consume secrets in your application code. It supports various AWS compute services, such as Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS), and AWS Lambda functions. In this solution, we share how you can install the Secrets Manager Agent on an EC2 machine and retrieve secrets in your application code by using CURL commands. See the AWS Secrets Manager Agent documentation to learn how you can use this agent with other types of compute services.

Prerequisites

You need to have the following:

  1. An AWS account
  2. The AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) version 2
  3. jq

Follow the steps on the Install or update to the latest version of the AWS CLI page to install the AWS CLI and the Configure the AWS CLI page to configure it.

Create the secret

The first step will be to create a secret in Secrets Manager by using the AWS CLI.

To create a secret

  • Enter the following command in a terminal to create a secret:
    aws secretsmanager create-secret --name MySecret --description "My Secret" \
      --secret-string "{\"user\": \"my_user\", \"password:\": \"my-password\"}"

    You will see an output like the following:

    % aws secretsmanager create-secret —name MySecret —description "My Secret" \
     —secret-string "{\"user\": \"my_user\", \"password:\": \"my-password\"}"
    {
     "ARN": "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:XXXXXXXXXXXX:secret:MySecret-LrBlpm",
     "Name": "MySecret",
     "VersionId": "b5e73e9b-6ec5-4144-a176-3648304b2d60"
    }

    Record the secret ARN as <SECRET_ARN>, because you will use it in the next section.

Create the IAM role

The Lambda function, the EC2 instance, and the ECS task definition need an IAM role that grants permission to retrieve the secret you just created.

To create the IAM role

  1. Using an editor, create a file named ec2_iam_policy.json with the following content:
    {
        "Version": "2012-10-17",
        "Statement": [
            {
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Principal": {
                    "Service": "ec2.amazonaws.com"
                },
                "Action": "sts:AssumeRole"
            } 
        ]
    }

  2. Type the following command in a terminal to create the IAM role:
    aws iam create-role --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role \
      --assume-role-policy-document file://ec2_iam_policy.json

  3. Create a file named iam_permission.json with the following content, replacing <SECRET_ARN> with the secret ARN you noted earlier:
    {
        "Version": "2012-10-17",
        "Statement": [
            {
                "Effect": "Allow",
                "Action": [
                    "secretsmanager:GetSecretValue",
                    "secretsmanager:DescribeSecret"
                ],
                "Resource": "<SECRET_ARN>"
            }
        ]
    }

  4. Type the following command to create a policy:
    aws iam create-policy \
      --policy-name get-secret-policy \
      --policy-document file://iam_permission.json

    Record the Arn as <POLICY_ARN>, because you will need that value next.

  5. Type the following command to add this policy to the IAM role, replacing <POLICY_ARN> with the value you just noted:
    aws iam attach-role-policy \
      --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role \
      --policy-arn <POLICY_ARN>

  6. Type the following command to add the AWS Systems Manager policy to the role:
    aws iam attach-role-policy \
      --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role \
      --policy-arn arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore

Launch an EC2 instance

Use the steps in this section to launch an EC2 instance.

To create an instance profile

  1. Type the following command to create an instance profile:
    aws iam create-instance-profile --instance-profile-name secret-profile

  2. Type the following command to associate this instance profile with the role you just created:
    aws iam add-role-to-instance-profile --instance-profile-name secret-profile \
      --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role

To create a security group

  • Type the following command to create a security group:
    aws ec2 create-security-group --group-name secret-security-group \
      --description "Secrets Manager Security Group"

    Record the group ID as <GROUP_ID>, because you will need this value in the next step.

To launch an EC2 instance

  1. Run the following command to launch an EC2 instance, replacing <GROUP_ID> with the security group ID:
    aws ec2 run-instances \
      --image-id resolve:ssm:/aws/service/ami-amazon-linux-latest/amzn2-ami-hvm-x86_64-gp2 \
      --instance-type t3.micro \
      --security-group-ids <GROUP_ID> \
      --iam-instance-profile Name=secret-profile \
      --tag-specifications 'ResourceType=instance,Tags=[{Key=Name,Value=secret-instance}]'

    Record the InstanceId value as <INSTANCE_ID>.

  2. Check the status of this launch by running the following command:
    aws ec2 describe-instances --filters Name=tag:Name,Values=secret-instance | \
      jq ".Reservations[0].Instances[0].State"

    You will see a response like the following, which shows that the instance is running:

    % aws ec2 describe-instances —filters Name=tag:Name,Values=secret-instance | jq ".Reservations[0].Instances[0].State"
    {
     "Code": 16,
     "Name": "running"
    }

  3. After the instance is in running state, type the following command to connect to the EC2 instance, replacing <INSTANCE_ID> with the value you noted earlier:
    aws ssm start-session --target <INSTANCE_ID>

Leave the session open, because you will use it in the next step.

Install the Secrets Manager Agent to the EC2 instance

Use the steps in this section to install the Secrets Manager Agent in the EC2 instance. You will run these commands in the EC2 instance you created earlier.

To download the Secrets Manager Agent code

  1. Type the following command to install git in the EC2 instance:
    sudo yum install -y git 

  2. Type the following command to download the Secrets Manager Agent code:
    cd ~;git clone https://github.com/awslabs/aws-secretsmanager-agent

To install the Secrets Manager Agent

  • Type the following command to install the Secrets Manager Agent:
    cd aws-secretsmanager-agent/release
    sudo ./install

To grant permission to read the token file

  • Type the following command to copy the token file and grant permission for the current user (ec2-user) to read it:
    sudo cp /var/run/awssmatoken /tmp
    sudo chown ssm-user /tmp/awssmatoken

Retrieve the secret

Now you can use the local web server to retrieve the agent. Processes running in this EC2 instance can retrieve the secret with a REST API call from the web server.

To retrieve a secret

Retrieving a secret is now possible for the process in this EC2 instance, thanks to the local agent.

  1. Run the following command to retrieve the secret:
    curl -H "X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token: $(</tmp/awssmatoken)” localhost:2773/secretsmanager/get?secretId=MySecret

    You will see the following output:

    $ curl -H "X-Aws-Parameters-Secrets-Token: $(</tmp/awssmatoken)" localhost:2773/secretsmanager/get?secretId=MySecret
    {"ARN":"arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:XXXXXXXXXXXX:secret:MySecret-3z00LH","Name":"MySecret","VersionId":"e7b07d00-a0e8-41b9-b76e-45bdd8daca4f","SecretString":"{\"user\": \"my_user\", \"password:\": \"my-password\"}","VersionStages":["AWSCURRENT"],"CreatedDate":"1716912317.961"}

  2. Exit from the EC2 instance by typing exit.

Clean up

Follow the steps in this section to clean up the resources created by the solution.

To terminate the EC2 instance and associated resources

  1. Type the following command to stop the EC2 instance, replacing <INSTANCE_ID> with the EC2 InstanceId received at the time of instance launch:
    aws ec2 terminate-instances --instance-ids <INSTANCE_ID>

  2. Run the following command to delete the security group:
    aws ec2 delete-security-group --group-name secret-security-group

  3. Run the following command to delete the IAM role from the instance profile:
    aws iam remove-role-from-instance-profile --instance-profile-name secret-profile \
      --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role

  4. Run these commands to delete the instance profile:
    aws iam delete-instance-profile --instance-profile-name secret-profile

To clean up the IAM role

  1. Run the following command to delete the policy role, replacing <POLICY_ARN> with the value you noted earlier:
    aws iam detach-role-policy --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role \
      --policy-arn <POLICY_ARN>

  2. Run the following command to detach the policy from the role:
    aws iam detach-role-policy --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role \
      --policy-arn arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore

  3. Run the following command to delete the IAM role:
    aws iam delete-role --role-name ec2-secret-execution-role

To clean up the secret

  • Run the following command to delete the secret:
    aws secretsmanager delete-secret --secret-id MySecret

Conclusion

In this post, we introduced the Secrets Manager Agent and showed how to install it in an EC2 instance, allowing the retrieval of secrets from Secrets Manager. An application can call this web server to retrieve secrets without using the AWS SDK. See the AWS Secrets Manager Agent documentation to learn more about how you can use this Secrets Manager Agent in other compute environments.

To learn more about AWS Secrets Manager, see the AWS Secrets Manager documentation.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Eduardo Patrocinio

Eduardo Patrocinio
Eduardo is a distinguished Principal Solutions Architect on the AWS Strategic Accounts team, bringing unparalleled expertise to the forefront of cloud technology. With an impressive career spanning over 25 years, Eduardo has been a driving force in designing and delivering innovative customer solutions within the dynamic realms of Cloud and Service Management.

Akshay Aggarwal

Akshay Aggarwal
Akshay is a Senior Technical Product Manager on the AWS Secrets Manager team. As part of AWS Cryptography, Akshay drives technologies and defines best practices that help improve customer’s experience of building secure, reliable workloads in the AWS Cloud. Akshay is passionate about building technologies that are easy to use, secure, and scalable.