Tag Archives: Amazon API Gateway

Customize Amazon API Gateway destinations for execution logs

Post Syndicated from Giedrius Praspaliauskas original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/customize-amazon-api-gateway-destinations-for-execution-logs/

Amazon API Gateway execution logs help you trace request processing step by step through your REST API stages. They capture authorization results, integration latency, mapping template output, and error details that are otherwise invisible at the API surface. When a production request fails in a way the access log cannot explain, the execution log is usually where you find the explanation.

Until now, execution logs had two constraints. Every log event was truncated at 1 KB, so a request carrying a moderately sized JSON body would exceed that limit and the remainder was dropped. Logs could only go to the auto-managed log group that API Gateway creates for you (API-Gateway-Execution-Logs_{rest-api-id}/{stage_name}).

With Amazon CloudWatch Logs delivery for REST API execution logs, you can now route execution logs to Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), or Amazon Data Firehose. Log events can be up to 1 MB per entry, and you benefit from vended logs pricing.

In this post, you learn how CloudWatch Logs delivery works with API Gateway execution logs, how to configure it, and what patterns work best for common observability scenarios.

Understanding API Gateway execution logs

API Gateway produces two categories of logs: access logs and execution logs. Access logs record a summary line per request, similar to an HTTP server access log. You configure the format and destination yourself.

Execution logs are different. They capture the internal processing of each request as it moves through the API Gateway pipeline: authorizer evaluation, request validation, integration dispatch, response mapping, and error handling. These logs exist so you can answer questions such as “why did my authorizer reject this token?” or “what did the mapping template produce before it reached my backend integration?”

API Gateway manages execution log creation automatically. When you set loggingLevel to INFO or ERROR in your stage’s method settings, the service writes execution log events to a CloudWatch Logs log group it manages on your behalf. You do not choose the log group name or configure retention directly on it.

The auto-managed model works for many customers but may create friction for teams with specific observability requirements. Compliance frameworks that require logs in S3 with a particular prefix structure need an extra subscription filter and delivery mechanism. Sending execution logs into a security information and event management (SIEM) tool through a Firehose stream requires a forwarding layer.

Configurable log delivery with CloudWatch Logs

CloudWatch Logs delivery separates log routing from log content. Two concepts control the behavior:

DeliverySource is scoped to your API Gateway stage ARN. It defines where logs go. You create a delivery source, then attach one or more delivery destinations (CloudWatch Logs log group, S3 bucket, or Firehose stream).

MethodSettings controls what gets logged. The loggingLevel setting (INFO, ERROR, or OFF) and dataTraceEnabled flag still determine which log events API Gateway produces. These settings work the same way regardless of whether you use the auto-managed log group or CloudWatch Logs delivery.

When you create a delivery using the CloudWatch Logs APIs, CloudWatch Logs activates your log delivery on your API Gateway stage. When you delete the delivery, CloudWatch Logs disables it accordingly. You do not need to flip any flags on the API Gateway side, and the execution logs automatically resume flowing to the auto-managed log group.

Your existing method settings keep their meaning. The loggingLevel and dataTraceEnabled values continue to control log content. If loggingLevel is already INFO or ERROR, creating a delivery redirects those logs to your chosen destination with no further configuration.

The following diagram shows how the pieces fit together.

Diagram showing one API Gateway stage delivery source fanning out to CloudWatch Logs, Amazon S3, and Firehose destinations.

Figure 1 — A single delivery source scoped to an API Gateway stage feeds one or more deliveries, each of which writes to a delivery destination backed by CloudWatch Logs, Amazon S3, or Amazon Data Firehose

The following table summarizes what changes when log delivery is active.

Aspect Standard execution logging Log delivery
Destination Auto-managed CloudWatch Logs log group CloudWatch Logs, Amazon S3, or Firehose
Multi-destination No Yes
Pricing Standard CloudWatch Logs ingestion Vended logs pricing
Log event size Truncated at 1 KB Up to 1 MB
Setup Set loggingLevel in MethodSettings Create delivery through CloudWatch Logs APIs
Teardown Set loggingLevel to OFF Delete delivery

What stays the same

Only execution log routing changes. Access logs continue to flow through accessLogSettings to whatever log group you configure, and unrelated stage features such as AWS X-Ray tracing, detailed CloudWatch metrics, throttling, and caching behave exactly as they did before.

Configuration and integration options

Before you create a delivery, confirm the following requirements:

  • The API Gateway REST API is deployed to a stage.
  • loggingLevel is set to INFO or ERROR in MethodSettings.
  • The account-level CloudWatch Logs IAM role is configured. For setup steps, see Set up CloudWatch logging for REST APIs in API Gateway.
  • For cross-account delivery, the destination has an appropriate resource policy attached through PutDeliveryDestinationPolicy.

Sending logs to a custom CloudWatch Logs log group

The most common starting point is redirecting execution logs to a log group you own. You get direct control over retention policies, metric filters, and subscription filters. The following steps use the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) with the fictitious REST API ID abc123, stage prod, Region us-east-1, and account 111122223333.

  1. Create a delivery source referencing your stage ARN. The log type for REST API execution logs is EXECUTION_LOGS:
    aws logs put-delivery-source \
        --name my-apigw-execution-logs \
        --resource-arn arn:aws:apigateway:us-east-1:111122223333:/restapis/abc123/stages/prod \
        --log-type EXECUTION_LOGS

  2. Create a delivery destination pointing to your custom (existing) log group, then create the delivery that connects them:
    aws logs put-delivery-destination \
        --name my-execution-log-destination \
        --delivery-destination-configuration \
            destinationResourceArn=arn:aws:logs:us-east-1:111122223333:log-group:/my-api/execution-logs

    aws logs create-delivery \
        --delivery-source-name my-apigw-execution-logs \
        --delivery-destination-arn arn:aws:logs:us-east-1:111122223333:delivery-destination:my-execution-log-destination

  3. Verify that the delivery is active by listing deliveries for the source:
    aws logs describe-deliveries

The response includes the delivery ID, source, and destination ARN after delivery is established. Execution logs flow to /my-api/execution-logs instead of the auto-managed group.

Note: Log delivery adds structured fields (resource_arn, event_timestamp, api_id, stage, resource_path, http_method, and payload) to each event, so a new delivery emits more than your previous logs. To keep the traditional execution log format with nothing extra, set output format and record fields while creating delivery destination and creating delivery:

aws logs put-delivery-destination \
    --output-format "plain" ...

aws logs create-delivery \
    --record-fields "payload" \
    --field-delimiter "" ...

Routing logs to Amazon S3

S3 works well for long-term retention at lower cost, or for feeding logs into analytics tools such as Amazon Athena. The bucket must be in the same region as your API. Create a delivery destination pointing to your bucket:

aws logs put-delivery-destination \
    --name s3-archive-destination \
    --delivery-destination-configuration \
        destinationResourceArn=arn:aws:s3:::amzn-s3-demo-apigw-logs

Then create a delivery using the same source name. CloudWatch Logs delivers the events to your bucket, where you can query them with Athena or catalog them with AWS Glue.

Streaming to Amazon Data Firehose

For real-time analytics pipelines or third-party SIEM integration, Firehose delivery sends execution log events directly to your stream. The setup is identical: create a delivery destination with your Firehose stream ARN, then create a delivery. With direct Firehose delivery, you no longer need to maintain CloudWatch Logs subscription filters and AWS Lambda forwarders to route execution logs to external analytics systems.

Multi-destination delivery and per-destination shaping

A single delivery source supports multiple destinations. You can route the same execution logs to CloudWatch Logs for real-time alerting, S3 for long-term compliance retention, and Firehose for your SIEM, all from one stage. Create additional deliveries using the same delivery source with different destination ARNs.

Each destination receives identical log events. To shape what reaches each destination, apply a CloudWatch Logs subscription filter on the CloudWatch Logs destination. For example, you can forward only ERROR-level events to a Lambda function that pushes alerts to a SIEM, while the same delivery source writes the full event stream to S3 for compliance.

Management console experience

You can also add a log delivery destination in the management console after you enable logging for the stage.

API Gateway console showing the option to add a log delivery destination after logging is enabled for the stage.

You can specify multiple destinations, both in the current or in a different account:

API Gateway console showing multiple delivery destinations configured, including cross-account options.

Keeping existing monitoring intact

If you have dashboards or alarms on the auto-managed log group, use that same log group as one of your delivery destinations. Your existing monitoring keeps working, and you gain the ability to send logs to additional destinations such as S3 or Firehose in parallel.

Best practices

Update dashboards and alarms before enabling log delivery. When you activate log delivery, the auto-managed log group stops receiving logs. Any CloudWatch alarms, dashboards, or Contributor Insights rules pointing to API-Gateway-Execution-Logs_{rest-api-id}/{stage_name} stop working. Migrate these references to your new log group before creating the delivery.

Keep loggingLevel at INFO or ERROR. Log delivery controls routing, not content. If loggingLevel is OFF, no execution log events are produced regardless of whether a delivery exists. Verify your method settings before troubleshooting missing logs.

Treat the 1 MB log event capacity as a security decision, not only a debugging convenience. With dataTraceEnabled set to true, execution logs include complete request and response payloads up to 1 MB. Those payloads might contain personally identifiable information (PII) or other sensitive data. Confirm your log destinations have appropriate access controls, encryption, and retention policies. Mask or filter sensitive fields in mapping templates upstream of logging and enable data tracing selectively per method or only in non-production stages.

Start with a single destination, then expand. Validate that your log group or bucket receives events correctly before adding Firehose or additional destinations.

Log delivery is best-effort. In rare cases, some log events might not be delivered. For audit-critical workloads, build retention and reconciliation that account for occasional missing events rather than treating execution logs as the system of record.

Cleaning up

To avoid ongoing charges from the resources you created while following this post, delete the delivery and then remove the destinations and any example S3 bucket or Data Firehose delivery stream you no longer need. Deleting the delivery returns the stage to standard auto-managed logging.

aws logs delete-delivery --id <delivery-id>

When the delivery is deleted, CloudWatch Logs disables log delivery on the API Gateway stage automatically. The delivery source and delivery destination remain as independent objects. Delete them with delete-delivery-source and delete-delivery-destination if you do not plan to reuse them.

Conclusion

CloudWatch Logs delivery for API Gateway REST API execution logs helps address the 1 KB event truncation and single managed destination constraints. You can now route full execution logs to CloudWatch Logs, Amazon S3, or Amazon Data Firehose, use multiple destinations from a single stage, and pay vended logs pricing.

The feature works alongside existing method settings. No changes to your current logging configuration are required beyond creating the delivery itself.

To get started, refer to Route execution logs with Amazon CloudWatch Logs delivery in the API Gateway documentation. For more about CloudWatch Logs delivery configuration, see Enable logging from AWS services. For pricing details, review the Amazon CloudWatch pricing page. Try it on a test stage and share your experience in the comments.

Bring your own client certificate for backend mTLS in Amazon API Gateway

Post Syndicated from Biswanath Mukherjee original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/bring-your-own-client-certificate-for-backend-mtls-in-amazon-api-gateway/

Enterprises that use Amazon API Gateway in front of internal or partner backends often want to bring their own client certificate for backend mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication. During mTLS, the backend presents its own server certificate and also requests the caller to present a client certificate to validate it against a trusted certificate authority (CA). Until now, you could use only an API Gateway-generated, self-signed SSL certificate for the outbound connection, because there was no CA behind it for the backend to trust. Backends that enforce a specific corporate or partner CA reject that self-signed certificate, and the mutual TLS handshake fails. Bringing your own CA-signed certificate is necessary for scenarios such as migrating APIs off legacy gateways or meeting your internal PKI mandates that require certificates from an approved CA.

With API Gateway, you can now bring your own client certificate for backend mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication. You can either use a third-party certificate or a certificate issued by AWS Private Certificate Authority. If you’re using a third-party certificate, you must import the certificate in AWS Certificate Manager (ACM). Then you configure the ACM certificate ARN in your REST API stage. API Gateway presents that certificate during the backend mTLS handshake.

Solution overview

In this post, you build a REST API with an outbound mTLS connection using this newly launched API Gateway feature. This solution demonstrates an outbound mTLS connection between Amazon API Gateway and a backend application running on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS).

The following diagram shows the solution architecture.

Architecture diagram showing API Gateway presenting an ACM client certificate to a Network Load Balancer that forwards traffic to an NGINX sidecar and validator app on Amazon ECS Fargate, with certificates issued by AWS Private CA through ACM

The solution uses:

  1. AWS Private Certificate Authority with a root-subordinate CA hierarchy to issue both the client and server certificates through AWS Certificate Manager (ACM).

  2. Amazon API Gateway REST API stage configured with the ACM client certificate ARN (ClientCertificateId), so that the API Gateway presents the certificate during the outbound TLS handshake.

  3. Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate running an NGINX sidecar that holds the server certificate and validates the incoming client certificate against a CA bundle (root and subordinate chain).

A request goes through the following steps:

  1. Client application invokes the REST API exposed by API Gateway. The API Gateway stage is configured with an ACM client certificate ARN.

  2. API Gateway opens an outbound connection to the Network Load Balancer (NLB) to begin the TLS handshake. The API Gateway presents an ACM client certificate configured at the stage level when the backend requests one.

  3. The NLB listens for the incoming TCP request on port 443 and forwards the call to Amazon ECS Fargate. The NLB acts as a passthrough and does not terminate the TLS connection.

  4. The NGINX sidecar container running on Amazon ECS performs the inbound mTLS handshake:

  • NGINX presents the backend server certificate and verifies the client certificate against a mounted CA bundle (root and subordinate chain).

  • After verification, NGINX forwards the request and parsed certificate details to the validator app container over local HTTP.

  • The validator app re-checks the certificate validity window, matches the common name against an allowlist, and returns a structured JSON response.

Note: The NGINX sidecar is not mandatory for this flow. It demonstrates separation of concerns: NGINX handles the mTLS handshake, and the validator app contains the business logic.

Prerequisites for demo

To follow along, you need the following:

Environment setup

Run the following commands to set up the demo environment:

  1. Create a new folder and clone the GitHub repository:

    git clone https://github.com/aws-samples/sample-api-backend-mtls
    cd sample-api-backend-mtls

  2. Set the environment variables after replacing the placeholders:

    ACCOUNT_ID=$(aws sts get-caller-identity --query Account --output text)
    REGION=<Your AWS Region, for example, us-east-1>
    STACK_NAME=<Your stack name e.g. outbound-mtls-backend>

Build the container images

Run the following commands to create container images of NGINX sidecar container and the validator app containers:

  1. Create two Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR) repositories, one for NGINX and another for validator app containers respectively:

    NGINX_REPO_URI=$(aws ecr create-repository \
      --repository-name $STACK_NAME-nginx-sidecar \
      --image-tag-mutability IMMUTABLE \
      --image-scanning-configuration scanOnPush=true \
      --region "$REGION" \
      --query "repository.repositoryUri" --output text)
    
    VALIDATOR_REPO_URI=$(aws ecr create-repository \
      --repository-name $STACK_NAME-validator-app \
      --image-tag-mutability IMMUTABLE \
      --image-scanning-configuration scanOnPush=true \
      --region "$REGION" \
      --query "repository.repositoryUri" --output text)
    
    aws ecr get-login-password --region "$REGION" \
      | docker login --username AWS --password-stdin "${ACCOUNT_ID}.dkr.ecr.${REGION}.amazonaws.com"

  2. Build and push the NGINX and validator app containers:

    docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t $STACK_NAME-nginx-sidecar nginx/
    docker tag $STACK_NAME-nginx-sidecar:latest "${NGINX_REPO_URI}:latest"
    docker push "${NGINX_REPO_URI}:latest"
    docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t $STACK_NAME-validator-app validator_app/
    docker tag $STACK_NAME-validator-app:latest "${VALIDATOR_REPO_URI}:latest"
    docker push "${VALIDATOR_REPO_URI}:latest"

Deploy and test the solution

You first deploy the stack without the client certificate configured in the API Gateway and perform negative testing. The mTLS handshake will fail because of a missing client certificate in the request. Then you update the stack to configure client certificate in API Gateway stage and retest mTLS.

  1. Run the following command to build and deploy the overall stack without client certificate configured at API Gateway stage:

    sam build
    sam deploy \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME \
      --resolve-s3 \
      --capabilities CAPABILITY_IAM \
      --region "$REGION" \
      --parameter-overrides \
      NginxRepositoryUri="$NGINX_REPO_URI" \
      ValidatorRepositoryUri="$VALIDATOR_REPO_URI" \
      EnableOutboundMtls=false

  2. Wait for the task to reach RUNNING and pass its target group health check:

    EcsClusterName=$(aws cloudformation describe-stacks \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region "$REGION" \
      --query "Stacks[0].Outputs[?OutputKey=='EcsClusterName'].OutputValue" \
      --output text)
    
    TargetGroupArn=$(aws cloudformation describe-stacks \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region "$REGION" \
      --query "Stacks[0].Outputs[?OutputKey=='TargetGroupArn'].OutputValue" \
      --output text)
    
    aws ecs list-tasks --cluster "$EcsClusterName" --region "$REGION"
    
    aws elbv2 describe-target-health \
      --target-group-arn "$TargetGroupArn" --region "$REGION"

  3. Capture the front API invoke URL from the stack outputs:

    FRONT_API_URL=$(aws cloudformation describe-stacks \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region "$REGION" \
      --query "Stacks[0].Outputs[?OutputKey=='FrontApiUrl'].OutputValue" \
      --output text)
    
    NLB_DNS_NAME=$(aws cloudformation describe-stacks \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region "$REGION" \
      --query "Stacks[0].Outputs[?OutputKey=='NlbDnsName'].OutputValue" \
      --output text)
    
    FRONT_CLIENT_CERT_ARN=$(aws cloudformation describe-stacks \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region "$REGION" \
      --query "Stacks[0].Outputs[?OutputKey=='FrontClientCertArn'].OutputValue" \
      --output text)
    
    FRONT_API_ID=$(aws cloudformation describe-stacks \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region "$REGION" \
      --query "Stacks[0].Outputs[?OutputKey=='FrontApiId'].OutputValue" \
      --output text)

  4. Wait a minute or two after the stack finishes, then invoke the front API:

    curl -v "$FRONT_API_URL"

    The following is the NGINX configuration for mTLS:

    ...
    server {
        listen 443 ssl;
        # Server identity (issued by the private CA).
        ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/certs/server.crt;
        ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/certs/server.key;
        # Inbound mutual TLS: require and validate the client certificate
        # against the CA bundle (root + subordinate CA chain).
        ssl_client_certificate /etc/nginx/certs/ca_bundle.pem;
        ssl_verify_client on;
        ssl_verify_depth 2;
        ssl_protocols TLSv1.2;
    ...}

    The curl command returns HTTP/2 400, with a response body containing 400 No required SSL certificate was sent. Because the API Gateway is not presenting a client certificate on the outbound handshake, the NGINX sidecar container in Amazon ECS rejects the mTLS connection. The following screenshot shows the response:

    Terminal response showing an HTTP/2 400 error with the message No required SSL certificate was sent
  5. Now redeploy the solution with outbound mTLS enabled:

    sam deploy \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME \
      --resolve-s3 \
      --capabilities CAPABILITY_IAM \
      --region "$REGION" \
      --parameter-overrides \
      NginxRepositoryUri="$NGINX_REPO_URI" \
      ValidatorRepositoryUri="$VALIDATOR_REPO_URI" \
      EnableOutboundMtls=true

  6. Wait a minute or two after the stack finishes, then invoke the front API again:

    curl -v "$FRONT_API_URL"

    Because the client certificate is now presented during the mTLS handshake, the handshake completes successfully, as shown in the following response snippet:

    Terminal response showing a successful mTLS handshake and an HTTP 200 response from the backend

Automatic certificate renewal

When a certificate changes in ACM, API Gateway detects the update and propagates the new certificate automatically. You do not redeploy the stage, and the API experiences no downtime during rotation. Certificate propagation is eventually consistent. During an update, the backend might briefly receive either the old or the new certificate. ACM also emits certificate expiration notifications through Amazon EventBridge, which you can use to set alarms before a certificate expires.

Clean up

If you followed along only for demonstration purposes, to avoid incurring future charges, run the following commands to delete the resources created in this demo:

  1. Clean up the S3 buckets:

    NLB_LOGS_BUCKET=$(aws cloudformation describe-stacks \
      --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region $REGION \
      --query "Stacks[0].Outputs[?OutputKey=='NlbAccessLogsBucketName'].OutputValue" \
      --output text)
    
    aws s3api list-object-versions --bucket "$NLB_LOGS_BUCKET" \
      --query '{Objects: Versions[].{Key:Key,VersionId:VersionId}}' \
      --output json | \
      jq -c '.Objects[]? // empty' | \
      while read -r obj; do
        aws s3api delete-object --bucket "$NLB_LOGS_BUCKET" \
          --key "$(echo "$obj" | jq -r .Key)" \
          --version-id "$(echo "$obj" | jq -r .VersionId)" \
          --region $REGION
      done
    
    aws s3api list-object-versions --bucket "$NLB_LOGS_BUCKET" \
      --query '{Objects: DeleteMarkers[].{Key:Key,VersionId:VersionId}}' \
      --output json | \
      jq -c '.Objects[]? // empty' | \
      while read -r obj; do
        aws s3api delete-object --bucket "$NLB_LOGS_BUCKET" \
          --key "$(echo "$obj" | jq -r .Key)" \
          --version-id "$(echo "$obj" | jq -r .VersionId)" \
          --region $REGION
      done

  2. Delete the stack:

    sam delete --stack-name $STACK_NAME --region $REGION --no-prompts

  3. Delete the ECR repository:

    aws ecr delete-repository --repository-name $STACK_NAME-nginx-sidecar --force --region $REGION
    aws ecr delete-repository --repository-name $STACK_NAME-validator-app --force --region $REGION

Conclusion

In this post, you configured a REST API with an outbound mTLS connection using Amazon API Gateway and an ECS Fargate backend. With this new feature launch in API Gateway, you can now bring your own client certificate for outbound mTLS handshake for your REST APIs. You can now meet your internal PKI mandates to authenticate backends that pin a specific certificate issuer.

To get started, import a certificate from your own PKI into ACM and configure your API Gateway REST API stage for outbound mTLS authentication. For more information, see Present client certificates to backend services with mutual TLS in API Gateway. If you have feedback about this post, leave it in the comments section. For technical questions, you can start a thread on AWS re:Post.

Further reading

Eclipse Dataspace Components on AWS: Cost optimization strategies

Post Syndicated from Jorge Hernández Suárez original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/eclipse-dataspace-components-on-aws-cost-optimization-strategies/

When you deploy Eclipse Dataspace Components (EDC) connectors on AWS, one of the first challenges you face is predicting and controlling the cost of the required infrastructure. Without clear benchmarks, it is difficult to make informed decisions about workload sizing, environment configuration, and long-term investment.

Part 1 of this 3-part blog series covered the fundamentals of data space architectures and the EDC per the International Data Space Association’s (IDSA) standards. Part 2 explored production-ready architecture patterns for deploying EDC connectors on Amazon Web Services (AWS), discussing operational excellence, security, and reliability principles. This final post covers the remaining three AWS Well-Architected Framework pillars: Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, and Sustainability.

In this post, you will learn which AWS services drive cost in an EDC connector deployment, how to estimate monthly costs for business-critical and non-critical workloads, and how to apply optimization strategies that can reduce your spending by up to 58%.

Understanding cost drivers in data space deployments

Data spaces are secure and sovereign data environments that enable data sharing across independent organizations. With these architectures, you can collaborate with external organizations while maintaining full control over your data and compliance with data sovereignty principles. Your infrastructure costs can vary significantly. The main factors are your performance and reliability requirements, along with data volume and velocity across the network. It’s also important to distinguish between two types of infrastructure. A Dataspace Governance Authority (DSGA) centrally establishes components such as management, identity, and discovery functions. Participants host other components themselves, including the connector. This blog post focuses only on costs associated with EDC connector deployment on the participant, that is, the data provider and consumer sides.

Fictional usage assumptions

Before diving into the numbers, here are technical and operational assumptions you can use as a baseline for your own estimates.

Technical assumptions

Category Assumption Justification
Data Volume 5 GB per participant Includes 6 months of historical data, and backups
Network Traffic 20 GB/month per participant Data transfers between participants
API Calls 100,000/month per participant Catalog queries, contract negotiations, and data transfers
OAuth Token Requests 1,000/month per participant Machine-to-machine authentication for data plane operations

Table 1: Technical assumptions for EDC connector cost estimation

Operational assumptions

  • Single AWS Region: Spain (eu-south-2)
  • Operating hours: 24/7/365.
  • Growth rate: Not considered in baseline estimates.
  • Disaster recovery: Automated backups only (no cross-region replication)

Deployment architecture and scenarios

Figure 1 shows the reference architecture for deploying production-ready EDC connectors on AWS, covered in depth in Part 2 of this series.

Production-ready EDC connector deployment architecture diagram showing AWS services including Amazon ECS, Amazon Aurora, Network Load Balancer, and supporting services

Figure 1: Production-ready EDC connector deployment

This post considers two cost scenarios depending on the criticality of the workload:

  • Business-critical workloads: Designed for high availability, performance, and reliability of use cases supporting critical business functions.
  • Non-critical workloads: Designed for use cases that tolerate interruptions, testing environments, or production workloads where brief disruptions are acceptable.

Both scenarios follow the architecture patterns described in Part 2 of this post series, with the primary differences being in sizing of compute and database resources.

Cost estimation: Business-critical workloads

Note: These estimates use the assumptions above and illustrate the relative cost contribution of each service. Your actual costs may vary based on your specific usage patterns, data volumes and regional pricing. This post highlights which components represent the highest cost drivers and therefore come with the highest potential for optimization.

AWS Service Configuration Monthly Cost (USD)
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL-Compatible Edition db.r6g.large (2 vCPU, 16 GB), 20 GB storage + 10 GB backup 276.00
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) with AWS Fargate 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, always on 83.00
Network Load Balancer 20 GB processed data 20.00
AWS Secrets Manager 10 secrets 4.00
Amazon Cognito 1K machine-to-machine (M2M) token requests 2.25
Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR) 2 GB storage, 10 GB transfer 1.00
Amazon API Gateway 100K REST API calls 0.40
Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) 5 GB Standard tier 0.10
Total 387.00

Table 2: Estimated monthly cost for business-critical EDC connector deployment

These estimates help identify where your budget goes and where optimization has the most impact. In the business-critical scenario, the main cost driver is Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL. The db.r6g.large configuration is selected for constant workloads that require reliability and speed with high memory and performance. Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate is the second largest cost contributor as it runs containers continuously to maintain environment availability. Network Load Balancer represents a third notable cost component, while the remaining services contribute only a small portion of the total cost.

Cost estimation: Non-critical workloads

If you are running development, testing, or experimentation environments, you can reduce costs by up to 58% through rightsizing and use of Amazon EC2 Spot capacity.

AWS Service Configuration Monthly Cost (USD)
Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL-Compatible db.t4g.medium (2 vCPU, 4 GB), 20 GB storage + 10 GB backup 110.00
Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate Spot 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, always on 26.00
Network Load Balancer 20 GB processed data 20.00
AWS Secrets Manager 10 secrets 4.00
Amazon Cognito 1K M2M token requests 2.25
Amazon ECR 2 GB storage, 10 GB transfer 1.00
Amazon API Gateway 100K REST API calls 0.40
Amazon S3 5 GB Standard tier 0.10
Total 164.00

Table 3: Estimated monthly cost for non-critical EDC connector deployment

These figures show that a non-critical configuration can cut costs significantly while maintaining the same data throughput and API capacity. Costs are reduced through the use of smaller and more flexible resources. Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL remains the main cost driver, but the smaller instance type (db.t4g.medium) reduces cost significantly. From a compute perspective, using Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate Spot capacity cuts costs by almost 70% compared to the business-critical setup. In total, this configuration reduces the monthly cost by approximately 58%, while maintaining identical assumptions for data throughput, API calls, and storage.

Key takeaways on cost optimization

This comparison shows that the primary cost contributors in both scenarios are database, compute and load balancing resources, which represent baseline infrastructure costs rather than usage-based charges. Services like Amazon S3, API Gateway, and data transfer charges contribute marginally to overall costs at these volumes. This cost structure indicates that the architecture scales efficiently with increased usage. As you onboard more use cases and increase data volume and velocity, you get more value from your existing infrastructure investment without proportional cost increases.

Well-Architected pillars: Performance efficiency, cost optimization, and sustainability

Part 2 of this series covered EDC best practices along the Operational Excellence, Security, and Reliability pillars of the AWS Well-Architected Framework. This section covers the remaining three pillars as they apply to EDC deployments.

Performance efficiency

Right-size compute resources: Match your Amazon ECS task definitions to actual workload requirements. Start with smaller configurations and scale up based on observed metrics rather than over-provisioning from the start. Amazon CloudWatch Container Insights provides the visibility needed to make informed sizing decisions.

Use the flexibility of Amazon Aurora: For workloads with variable demand patterns, consider Amazon Aurora Serverless v2 which automatically scales database capacity based on application needs. This eliminates the need to provision for peak capacity while maintaining performance during high-demand periods.

Optimize data transfer patterns: Design your data plane operations to minimize unnecessary data movement. Use Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration for large transfers across geographic distances and consider data compression where appropriate to reduce both transfer times and costs.

Cost optimization

Reduce compute costs for fault-tolerant workloads: With AWS Fargate Spot, you can save up to 70% for workloads that can tolerate interruptions. Non-critical environments, batch processing, and development workloads are ideal candidates. Implement graceful shutdown handling to manage Spot interruptions effectively.

Lower storage costs over time: Configure Amazon S3 Lifecycle policies to automatically transition infrequently accessed data to lower-cost storage classes such as S3 Intelligent-Tiering or S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval. For EDC connector deployments, historical transfer logs and archived assets are good candidates for tiered storage.

Monitor for unexpected cost increases: Use AWS Cost Explorer and set up AWS Budgets with alerts to help detect unexpected cost increases. Tag EDC-related AWS resources consistently so you can accurately allocate costs and identify optimization opportunities.

Lock in lower rates for predictable workloads: For business-critical connectors with predictable, steady-state usage, Savings Plans for Amazon Aurora and AWS Fargate can provide significant discounts compared to On-Demand pricing.

Sustainability

Optimize resource utilization: Higher utilization of provisioned resources means less waste. Use automatic scaling policies to match capacity with demand and shut down non-production environments outside of business hours when possible.

Select efficient instance types: AWS Graviton-based instances (such as the r6g and t4g families used in our example) deliver better price-performance and energy efficiency compared to equivalent x86 instances. AWS Graviton processors offer improved performance per watt of energy use.

Minimize data movement: Each data transfer consumes energy. Design your data space integrations to avoid redundant transfers, cache frequently accessed catalog data of peers locally using the Federated Catalog, and batch operations where possible to reduce the total number of network round trips.

Summary

By rightsizing AWS infrastructure to match actual compute and database capacity needs, data space participants can achieve significant cost savings without compromising on data security and sovereignty aspects that make data spaces valuable. The comparison between business-critical and non-critical workload configurations demonstrates how AWS services like Amazon Aurora, AWS Fargate Spot, and Amazon S3 can be combined effectively to balance data sovereignty, performance, and cost efficiency.

As data spaces grow in adoption across industries and geographies, understanding these cost dynamics becomes increasingly important as you plan your network participation. The patterns and estimates in this post series offer a foundation for planning your cross-organizational data strategy and data spaces journey on AWS.

To get started, assess your workload criticality to determine whether a business-critical or non-critical configuration fits your needs. Then use the AWS Pricing Calculator to estimate costs for your specific data volumes, regions, and usage patterns. For an end-to-end reference implementation, explore the Dataspace Connector on AWS project which combines Infrastructure-as-Code with custom EDC extensions and AI tooling integration.

References

About the authors

Eclipse Dataspace Components on AWS: Architecture patterns in production

Post Syndicated from Jonas Bürkel original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/eclipse-dataspace-components-on-aws-architecture-patterns-in-production/

Running Eclipse Dataspace Components (EDC) connectors in production on AWS requires deliberate architecture decisions around isolation, managed services, and security layering. In Part 1 of this series, we covered the fundamentals of data space architectures and EDC per the International Data Space Association’s (IDSA) standards. If you are new to EDC, we recommend starting there. We showed how connector functionality can be customized to support native integration with Amazon Web Services (AWS) Cloud services. Examples include Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) for data storage and AWS Secrets Manager for credentials management. In this post, we dive deeper into the connector deployment architecture on AWS and present patterns and practices for production-grade deployments.

Fundamental architecture building blocks

The EDC connector consists of a control plane and a data plane that customers typically ship and deploy as containers. Depending on data integration requirements and support for specific protocols and capabilities, a custom EDC build process may need to be implemented as described in Part 1 of this series. For example, you may need OAuth 2.0 client credentials for the data plane to connect to backend systems. You store the resulting EDC container images in a container registry, such as Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR). Figure 1 shows an example architecture for EDC connector deployments on AWS following best practices for production use.

Architecture diagram showing production-ready EDC connector deployment on AWS with Amazon ECS, Aurora, S3, and API Gateway components

Figure 1: Production-ready EDC connector deployment on AWS

You can split the architecture into four sub-components:

  • Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and AWS Fargate provide serverless container orchestration. This allows for scalable EDC deployment without managing any of the underlying infrastructure.
  • EDC requires persistence to store secrets and relational control plane data, and a means of vending OAuth 2.0 client credentials. AWS Secrets Manager, Amazon Aurora and Amazon Cognito can provide these capabilities as managed services.
  • Amazon S3 provides durable data storage for handling both inbound and outbound data that is shared and received through the data space.
  • Finally, Amazon API Gateway and Network Load Balancer provide secure, private network connectivity to EDC APIs in an isolated Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC) using VPC links.

With this approach, all cloud resources belonging to a single EDC connector instance form an isolated architecture cell. You access this cell through the S3 bucket to move in data that is to be shared as part of an EDC asset, or to retrieve data received from a third party as part of an EDC data transfer. Secondly, the API Gateway can be configured to expose selected EDC API resources from its management API, data plane API and Dataspace Protocol (DSP) API. You can protect both means of interacting with the EDC architecture cell using AWS Identity and Access Management (AWS IAM) and the AWS Signature Version 4 (SigV4) protocol.

Larger enterprises participating in data spaces may decide to operate multiple EDCs depending on their requirements on failure isolation, data governance, and separation of shared and received data. A common pattern is to deploy separate connector instances per use case. Infrastructure-as-code such as AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) allows for automated, templatized deployment and management of EDC connectors over time while keeping operational effort at bay. Using the Dataspace Connector on AWS reference implementation, a full connector cell deploys from a single CDK command, ready to negotiate contracts and transfer data. Amazon API Gateway also comes with Model Context Protocol (MCP) proxy support. This allows EDC APIs to be consumed by authorized AI agents and MCP clients for autonomous data collection and sharing. Besides integration with agentic systems, customers often follow a workflow-based approach for connecting EDCs with their cloud-based data environments. They interact with both APIs and the peripheral S3 bucket to securely expose and retrieve external information.

Real-world validation of these architecture patterns can be seen in production deployments like the Prometheus-X Data Space Connector, for education sector use cases. This implementation uses the same core architecture we recommend: Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate for container orchestration, S3 for data storage, and event-driven processing with AWS Lambda and Amazon EventBridge. This demonstrates how these patterns work effectively in production environments across different industry sectors.

Key principles for production-readiness

We discuss some of the architecture principles that inform the best practices diagram highlighted in Figure 1 along three of the AWS Well-Architected Framework’s pillars.

Operational Excellence

Infrastructure as Code for Consistency: Define all infrastructure declaratively to support repeatable, version-controlled, and testable deployments. Automated validation, for example using CDK Nag, helps catch misconfigurations and security issues before deployment, shifting security left in the development lifecycle. The code itself serves as living documentation of the architecture.

Observability as a First-Class Concern: Treat monitoring and logging as core infrastructure components. Amazon CloudWatch Container Insights, Amazon CloudWatch Logs, and EDC’s structured health check endpoints provide visibility into system behavior, supporting proactive issue detection and faster troubleshooting. EDC APIs for health checks can be similarly exposed with restricted access through API Gateway and IAM.

Managed Services Over Self-Managed Infrastructure: Use AWS managed services (Aurora, Secrets Manager, Fargate, Cognito) instead of deploying and maintaining compatible self-managed solutions. This shifts undifferentiated heavy lifting to AWS and reduces operational burden. You gain high availability, built-in security best practices, compliance certifications, and automatic updates.

Security

Defense in Depth: Implement security through multiple independent layers rather than relying on a single control. Network isolation (VPC private subnets), security group segmentation (restricting traffic between components), IAM least privilege (scoped permissions per service), and encryption (at rest and in transit) each provide independent controls. These layers work together so that if one layer is bypassed, others continue to provide protection.

Principle of Least Privilege: Every component receives only the minimum permissions required for its specific function. Scope IAM roles to individual services (control plane, data plane) and restrict security groups to necessary ports and sources. The internal-only Network Load Balancer fronted by API Gateway prevents unintended public exposure of EDC APIs and data. This may also support security review and approval of EDC as open-source software, since APIs can be allowlisted and validated individually.

Encryption Everywhere: Encrypt data by default at every stage: at rest (Aurora, S3, Secrets Manager), in transit (TLS enforcement, HTTPS-only egress), and during processing (encrypted environment variables). This provides comprehensive data protection regardless of where information resides in the system.

Reliability

Fail Fast, Recover Automatically: Systems detect failures quickly and recover without manual intervention. ECS circuit breakers can automatically roll back failed deployments, automated health checks remove unhealthy targets, and point-in-time recovery supports rapid database restoration. This minimizes mean time to recovery (MTTR) and reduces the scope of failures, even within a single EDC architecture cell.

Design for Regional Resilience: Cross-zone load balancing distributes traffic across multiple Availability Zones (AZs), Aurora automatically replicates data across AZs, and Fargate tasks can be scheduled in any AZ. The highlighted architecture can tolerate Availability Zone failures in an AWS Region without service disruption. For more information about Availability Zones and Regions, see AWS Global Infrastructure.

Decoupled Components with Clear Boundaries: Deploy the control plane and data plane as independent services with distinct responsibilities, security contexts, and scaling characteristics. This separation enables independent updates, targeted scaling, and failure isolation between coordination logic and data transfer operations.

The remaining three Well-Architected Framework pillars of Performance Efficiency, Cost Optimization, and Sustainability are covered in the third post of this series where we discuss cost optimization strategies for running EDC connectors on AWS.

Conclusion

With the growing popularity of data spaces and EDC as a data space connector, it is important to distinguish between a setup suitable for testing and experimentation and one that is ready for production. Production environments require that business-critical processes depend on timely, successful transmission of confidential information between participants. The architecture defined in this post combines EDC deployment best practices from the community with AWS recommendations to achieve fault tolerance, scalability, and security while keeping operational complexity at a minimum.

In part 3, you will learn about cost optimization strategies to run your production-ready connector efficiently and maximize the value it returns by supporting business use cases for data sharing along your supply network. In the meantime, explore the Dataspace Connector on AWS project and see how the patterns and best practices covered in this post come together in an end-to-end reference implementation.

References

About the authors

Eclipse Dataspace Components on AWS: Data sharing fundamentals

Post Syndicated from Alejandro Esquivias Cañadas original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/eclipse-dataspace-components-on-aws-data-sharing-fundamentals/

This three-part blog series guides you through implementing Eclipse Dataspace Components (EDC) on AWS, from foundational concept to production deployment. Part 1 establishes the theoretical foundation with IDSA standards, the Dataspace Protocol (DSP), and core EDC architecture. Part 2 provides production-ready AWS deployment patterns using services like Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), Amazon Aurora, and Amazon API Gateway. Part 3 completes the journey with cost optimization strategies and practical guidance for running efficient, scalable data space infrastructure on AWS.

The International Data Spaces Association (IDSA) is a non-profit organization focused on establishing and promoting standards for data spaces. A data space is defined as a “set of technical services that facilitate interoperable dataset sharing between distinct entities”. At a technical level, a data space has participants: data consumers and data providers. Centrally, there is a Dataspace Governance Authority (DSGA). The DSGA manages the data space, enforces rules and policies and issues membership credentials to participants.

IDSA rules and specifications are implemented in the Dataspace Protocol (DSP). The DSP has become an Eclipse Specification project and can be found in the Dataspace Protocol GitHub repository. Standardization is under development and is currently in the approval phase as ISO/IEC DIS 20151. The Eclipse Dataspace Components (EDC) provide the technical components to implement data spaces according to IDSA requirements.

These components include the federated catalog (FC), the connector, and the identity hub. The FC contains an aggregated repository of catalogs gathered from multiple participants in the data space. These are obtained by periodically crawling participants’ data assets and storing them in a local cache, to eliminate the need to query each participant individually on demand. The connector is the software that enables data to be shared between participants, and identity hub manages a participant’s credentials in the data space. Amazon Web Services (AWS) provides a comprehensive cloud infrastructure that supports the deployment and operation of data space components like the EDC connector. AWS offers scalable compute, storage, and networking services that help you build secure, compliant, and interoperable data spaces aligned with IDSA standards and the ISO/IEC DIS 20151 specifications.

To verify identities in a data space in a decentralized manner, the Decentralized Claims Protocol (DCP) is used. DCP represents an overlay on top of DSP to establish trust between network participants. When an issuer needs to prove their identity to a verifier, they first generate a Decentralized Identifier (DID), which contains information about their identity. The issuer stores their Verifiable Credential (VC) in their identity hub. A verifiable credential is similar to a certificate: while a certificate authority validates a public key, the credential issuer validates the DID with specific attributes. The verifier looks up the DID of the issuer and with the information obtained from the DID document verifies the VC.

High-level diagram showing how DCP establishes trust between an issuer and verifier using DIDs and Verifiable Credentials

Figure 1: High-level diagram of the Decentralized Claims Protocol (DCP)

Simplified overview showing how a verifier resolves a DID document to verify credentials

Figure 2: Simplified overview of DID document processing

The final element of the EDC are the different types of policies, including membership, access, contract and usage policies.

The role of the connector

The EDC connector is divided into two parts: the control plane and the data plane. The control plane handles contract negotiation and sends messages to the data plane to initiate a data transfer. The data plane is responsible for transferring data from a provider’s to a consumer’s EDC connector across distinct legal entities.

Diagram showing the EDC connector architecture with separate control plane and data plane

Figure 3: Overview of the connector control and data plane

Structure of the EDC connector open-source project

The Connector repository as part of the EDC project defines how the connector control and data planes are implemented. We provide an overview of how the repository is structured:

  • /spi – The Service Provider Interface (SPI) is the architectural foundation that defines how modules communicate within the EDC connector. It contains foundational interfaces and contracts that every component must implement, establishing standardized integration patterns. This layer also acts as a blueprint for developers to extend EDC connector functionality while maintaining clean separation of concerns and ensuring compatibility between core and custom components.
  • /core – The Core module represents the core SPI implementation. It houses the actual working code for the connector’s essential operations, including default implementations of key services and business logic for data sharing.
  • /extensions – The Extensions layer showcases the connector’s modular plugin architecture through real-world integrations, including connections to major cloud providers like AWS. These extensions serve both as reference implementations and ready-to-use components for common enterprise integration scenarios.

SPI defines the contracts, Core implements the basics, and Extensions add specialized functionality. These three layers work together to create a flexible, extensible data space connector system. The “vanilla” Eclipse EDC connector does not bundle the AWS extensions by default. To add AWS service-specific functionality, such as integration with Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), AWS Secrets Manager, or Amazon DynamoDB, you need to include the respective AWS extensions into a custom EDC control and data plane build.

High-level EDC customization guide

Customizing the EDC connector for native AWS service integration creates a purpose-built solution that can use AWS managed services for storage, security, and scalability. The following steps help your connector natively integrate with services like Amazon S3 for data storage (used for example as Asset Administration Shell “Submodel Server”) and AWS Secrets Manager for credentials management, rather than relying on operations of self-managed components.

EDC uses a modular, plugin-based architecture built on Gradle. The vanilla connector ships only core functionality. To integrate with specific cloud services or persistence backends, you assemble a custom build that combines EDC’s core modules with the extensions you need. The customization revolves around three concepts: a version catalog, launcher modules, and a project settings file.

Step 1: Version catalog

The version catalog (gradle/libs.versions.toml) is the centralized registry of all dependencies and their versions. Here you declare which EDC modules, cloud provider extensions, and third-party libraries your connector needs to use. EDC publishes its AWS extensions under the org.eclipse.edc.aws Maven group. You reference these alongside the core EDC artifacts (org.eclipse.edc) at compatible version numbers. This single file ensures all modules in your project share consistent dependency versions.

Step 2: Launcher modules

The launcher modules are the actual deployable units: one for the control plane and one for the data plane. Each launcher is a small Gradle subproject whose build.gradle.kts lists the extensions to bundle at runtime. A typical control plane launcher might include the core control plane module, a metadata persistence extension (such as PostgreSQL or DynamoDB), a vault extension (such as HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager), and any provisioning extensions for your target storage system. The data plane launcher follows the same pattern with data plane-specific modules. Both launchers typically use Gradle plugins to produce a single executable JAR. You only include what you actually use, keeping the connector lightweight and tailored to your unique requirements.

Step 3: Project settings

The project settings file (settings.gradle.kts) registers all modules with Gradle: your launcher subprojects and any custom extensions you may develop locally. If you write your own extension, for example, a DynamoDB-backed asset store, you place it in an extensions/ directory and register it here so your launchers can reference it as a project dependency.

The resulting project structure typically looks like this:

my-connector/
├── control-plane/
│   └── build.gradle.kts       # Control plane launcher
├── data-plane/
│   └── build.gradle.kts       # Data plane launcher
├── extensions/                # Optional: Custom extension code
├── gradle/libs.versions.toml  # All dependency versions
├── build.gradle.kts           # Root build config
└── settings.gradle.kts        # Subproject registrations

An open-source reference implementation for EDC customization on AWS is provided as part of the Dataspace Connector on AWS project. In this post, you learned about the fundamentals behind secure, cross-organizational data sharing using emerging data space architectures. We covered the two protocols included in ISO/IEC DIS 20151 data space standardization, DSP and DCP, and discussed the EDC connector, the main software required for data space participants, and how it can be customized.

In part 2, we explore production-ready deployment patterns for EDC connectors on AWS, examining architecture best practices that support your data space infrastructure’s security, reliability, and operational efficiency. To get started, explore the Dataspace Connector on AWS project and see how its Gradle build settings are configured to support Amazon DynamoDB for serverless, inexpensive metadata persistence.

References

About the authors

Multi-Region event-driven failover architecture with Amazon EventBridge and Route 53

Post Syndicated from Napoleone Capasso original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/multi-region-event-driven-failover-architecture-with-amazon-eventbridge-and-route-53/

Multi-Region Event-Driven Failover Architecture with Amazon EventBridge and Route 53

Event-driven architectures enable applications to respond to events in real-time, providing scalability and loose coupling between components. However, ensuring high availability across multiple AWS regions requires careful design of failover mechanisms. This post demonstrates how to build a resilient multi-region event-driven architecture using Amazon EventBridge, Amazon API Gateway, and Amazon Route 53 health-based failover.

Overview

Organizations building event-driven applications need to achieve high availability and disaster recovery capabilities. This architecture provides automatic failover between AWS regions while maintaining regional independence for event processing. The solution uses Amazon Route 53 health checks to monitor regional Amazon API Gateway endpoints and automatically routes traffic to healthy regions without manual intervention.

The architecture delivers several key benefits. Regional independence reduces latency by processing events in the same region where they originate. Amazon DynamoDB global tables provide automatic data replication across regions, ensuring data availability during regional failures. The solution provides robust failover capabilities while maintaining architectural simplicity.

Organizations with strict availability requirements can find this solution particularly valuable. All event processing remains within AWS regions, and failover occurs automatically based on health check results. The architecture supports both planned maintenance windows and unplanned regional outages, providing flexibility for operational needs.

Solution overview

The solution implements an active-passive multi-region architecture where events flow through Amazon API Gateway to regional Amazon EventBridge buses. Amazon Route 53 health checks monitor the primary region and automatically route traffic to the secondary region during failures. Each region processes events independently, while Amazon DynamoDB Global Tables replicate data across regions.

The following diagram provides an overview of the solution:

The above diagram depicts the multi-region architecture running across two AWS regions. The Route 53 DNS service serves as the main entry point for the application, with health checks monitoring both regions. Each region contains an identical stack with Amazon API Gateway, Amazon EventBridge, Amazon SQS, and AWS Lambda. The Amazon DynamoDB Global Table replicates data between regions automatically.

Solution deployment

To deploy this solution, follow the instructions in the GitHub repository and clone the repository. The solution deploys in two AWS regions. Ensure valid SSL certificates exist in AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) in both regions for the custom domain.

Prerequisites

For this walkthrough, the following resources are needed:

  • AWS Account: An AWS account with permissions to create and manage Amazon API Gateway, Amazon EventBridge, Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Route 53, AWS IAM, and AWS CloudFormation resources
  • AWS Serverless Application Model (SAM): The AWS SAM CLI installed, as the templates use the SAM transform for Lambda and API Gateway resource definitions
  • Domain Name: A registered domain with a Route 53 hosted zone- SSL Certificates: ACM certificates for the custom domain in both deployment regions
  • AWS CLI: The AWS CLI installed and configured with credentials for the target AWS account
  • Region Selection: Two AWS regions for deployment

Walkthrough

The AWS CloudFormation templates from the sample GitHub repository create a secure, multi-region architecture that provides automatic failover for event-driven applications. The templates provision regional API Gateway endpoints, EventBridge buses, SQS queues, Lambda functions, and an Amazon DynamoDB Global Table. The solution establishes health monitoring through Route 53 health checks and configures DNS failover routing. The templates use AWS Serverless Application Model (SAM) transform to simplify Lambda and API Gateway resource definitions.

Step 1: Deploy the primary stack

The primary stack creates the foundational resources in the primary region. This includes the Amazon EventBridge bus, Amazon API Gateway with custom domain, health check, AWS Lambda function, Amazon SQS queue, and Amazon DynamoDB Global Table. The stack creates an EventBridge bus that receives events from API Gateway:

EventBus: 
Type: AWS::Events::EventBus 
Properties: 
Name: !Ref EventBusName

The API Gateway uses AWS service integration to forward events directly to EventBridge:

x-amazon-apigateway-integration: 
type: "aws" 
uri: !Sub "arn:aws:apigateway:${AWS::Region}:events:path//" 
credentials: !GetAtt ApiGatewayEventBridgeRole.Arn 
httpMethod: "POST"

The health check monitors the API Gateway endpoint to determine regional availability:

DomainHealthCheck: 
Type: AWS::Route53::HealthCheck 
Properties: 
HealthCheckConfig: 
Type: HTTPS 
ResourcePath: /Prod/health FullyQualified
DomainName: !Sub ${Api}.execute-api.${AWS::Region}.amazonaws.com 
Port: 443 
RequestInterval: 30 
FailureThreshold: 3

The Route 53 DNS record configures failover routing with the PRIMARY designation:

ApiDnsRecord:
Type: AWS::Route53::RecordSet
Properties:
HostedZoneId: !Ref HostedZoneId
Name: !Ref CustomDomainName
Type: A
SetIdentifier: primary-region
Failover: PRIMARY
HealthCheckId: !Ref DomainHealthCheck

The DynamoDB Global Table creates replicas in both regions:

DataTable: 
Type: AWS::DynamoDB::GlobalTable 
Properties: 
BillingMode: PAY_PER_REQUEST 
Replicas: 
- Region: !Ref AWS::Region 
- Region: !Ref SecondaryRegion

Note the `DataTableName` output value for use in the secondary stack deployment. The `CustomDomainURL` output provides the endpoint to invoke the solution.

Step 2: Deploy the secondary stack

The secondary stack creates identical resources in the secondary region , except for the Amazon DynamoDB table which references the existing Global Table. The secondary stack creates its own Amazon EventBridge bus, Amazon API Gateway, health check, AWS Lambda function, and Amazon SQS queue. The Route 53 DNS record uses the SECONDARY designation

Step 3: Event processing flow

Events flow through the processing pipeline in each region. API Gateway receives events and forwards them to EventBridge using the PutEvents API. EventBridge evaluates event rules and routes matching events to SQS queues. Lambda functions poll the SQS queues and process events in batches. AWS Lambda writes processed data to the DynamoDB Global Table, which replicates across regions.

The Lambda function processes events from the queue and writes to DynamoDB:

def handler(event, context): 
for record in event.get('Records', []): 
body = json.loads(record['body']) 
detail = body.get('detail', {}) 
event_id = body.get('id', '') 
item = { 'id': event_id, 'detail': detail, 'timestamp': datetime.utcnow().isoformat() } 
table.put_item(Item=item)

Testing

Fetch the custom domain URL and test it by sending an event:

curl -X POST https://api.example.com \-H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "Detail": { "IsHelloWorldExample": "true" }, "DetailType": "POSTED", "Source": "demo.event" }' -v

The response includes an `X-Region` header indicating which region processed the request. Under normal conditions, this shows the primary region.

To test failover:

  1. Remove the base path mapping for the primary region:
aws apigateway delete-base-path-mapping \ --domain-name api.example.com \ --base-path '(none)' \ --region {primary-region}
  1. Delete the primary API Gateway stage:

aws apigateway delete-stage \ --rest-api-id <primary-api-id> \ --stage-name Prod \ --region {primary-region}

  1. Wait 2-3 minutes for the health check to fail. The Route 53 health check performs checks every 30 seconds with a failure threshold of 3, requiring 90 seconds to detect the failure.
  2. Send another request to the API endpoint:
curl -X POST https://api.example.com \-H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "Detail": { "IsHelloWorldExample": "true" }, "DetailType": "POSTED", "Source": "demo.event" }' -v
  1. Verify the failover: The `X-Region` header now shows the secondary region, confirming successful failover.

Verify event processing in the secondary region:

  1. Check the Lambda logs for successful processing:

aws logs tail /aws/lambda/<secondary-lambda-name> --region {secondary region}

You should see log entries similar to:

Processing message: 
{"version":"0",
"id":"abc12345-...",
"source":"demo.event",
"detail-type":"POSTED",...} 
Event Source: demo.event
Detail Type: POSTED
Successfully wrote item to DynamoDB: abc12345-... 
Successfully read item from DynamoDB: 
{'id': 'abc12345-...', 
'source': 'demo.event', 
'detailType': 'POSTED', 
'detail': 
{'data': {'IsHelloWorldExample': 'true'}, 
...}, 
'timestamp': '2025-01-15T18:30:00.000000', 
'processed': True}
  1. Verify the data in Amazon DynamoDB:

aws dynamodb scan \ --table-name <table-name> \ --region {secondary region}```

The scan results should include items with the event details:

{ "Items": 
[ { "id": {"S": "abc12345-..."}, 
"source": {"S": "demo.event"}, 
"detailType": {"S": "POSTED"},
"detail": 
{"M": {"data": 
{"M": 
{"IsHelloWorldExample": 
{"S": "true"}}}}}, 
"timestamp": {"S": "2025-01-15T18:30:00.000000"},
"processed": {"BOOL": true} } ], 
"Count": 1 }
  1. Restore the primary region – recreate the stage:

aws apigateway create-stage \ --rest-api-id <primary-api-id> \ --stage-name Prod \ --deployment-id <deployment-id> \ --region {primary region}

  1. Restore the primary region – recreate the base path mapping:

aws apigateway create-base-path-mapping \ --domain-name api.example.com \ --rest-api-id <primary-api-id> \ --stage Prod \ --region {primary region}

You can find the “deployment-id” by running: aws apigateway get-deployments \ --rest-api-id <primary-api-id> \ --region {primary region}

After 2-3 minutes, the health check passes and Route 53 routes traffic back to the primary region.

Cleanup

To remove the solution and avoid ongoing charges, delete the CloudFormation stacks in the correct order. Delete the secondary stack first, then the primary stack. This order is important because the Amazon DynamoDB Global Table is owned by the primary stack. Warning: Deleting these stacks permanently removes all resources including the Amazon DynamoDB global table and any event data stored in it. Back up any data you need before proceeding. This action cannot be undone. The following resources incur costs while deployed:

  • Amazon API Gateway (REST API)
  • Amazon Route 53 health checks and DNS records
  • Amazon DynamoDB global table (with cross-region replication)
  • AWS Lambda function invocations and duration
  • Amazon SQS queue operations
  • Amazon CloudWatch Logs storage

Delete the secondary stack:

aws cloudformation delete-stack --stack-name secondary-stack --region {secondary region}

Wait for the secondary stack deletion to complete:

aws cloudformation wait stack-delete-complete --stack-name secondary-stack --region {secondary region}

Delete the primary stack:

aws cloudformation delete-stack --stack-name primary-stack --region {primary region}

Wait for the primary stack deletion to complete:

aws cloudformation wait stack-delete-complete --stack-name primary-stack --region {primary region}

This removes all resources including the Amazon EventBridge buses, Amazon API Gateways, AWS Lambda functions, Amazon SQS queues, Amazon DynamoDB Global Table, Amazon Route 53 health checks, DNS records and IAM roles.

Conclusion

This post demonstrates how to establish a resilient multi-region architecture for event-driven applications using Amazon EventBridge, Amazon API Gateway, and Amazon Route 53. The solution uses Route 53 health-based failover, a powerful capability that automatically routes traffic to healthy regions based on health check results. This architecture significantly enhances application availability by providing automatic failover during regional outages while maintaining regional independence for event processing.

Serverless ICYMI Q4 2025

Post Syndicated from Julian Wood original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/serverless-icymi-q4-2025/

Stay current with the latest serverless innovations that can transform your applications. In this 31st quarterly recap, discover the most impactful AWS serverless launches, features, and resources from Q4 2025 that you might have missed.

In case you missed our last ICYMI, check out what happened in Q3 2025.

2025 Q4 calendar

2025 Q4 calendar

Serverless at re:Invent 2025

This post covers the biggest serverless announcements from re:Invent 2025, highlighting key feature updates that can improve your applications, and shares valuable resources to keep you informed.

AWS re:Invent 2025 had more than 60,000 in-person attendees and more than 2 million online viewers for the keynotes. The event featured 3,500 sessions from 3,000 speakers, which included information on 530 AWS service and feature announcements.

Keynote Igniting the serverless movement

Keynote Igniting the serverless movement

The serverless content consisted of two tracks: Containers and Serverless (CNS) and Application Integration (API). These tracks included 150 unique sessions watched in-person by more than 16,000 attendees. There were developer-focused experiences including a Road to re:Invent Hackathon, AWS Builder Loft, and Builders Arena. Serverlesspresso, the coffee shop powered by serverless technology, operated in two locations during the event: the Expo Hall and the certification lounge.

Serverless and developer community photo

Serverless and developer community photo

Find a curated list of serverless videos on Serverless Land YouTube.

AWS Lambda durable functions

Managing state across multi-step serverless workflows has traditionally required complex external orchestration tools. AWS Lambda durable functions expand how developers can use Lambda. You can now build reliable multi-step applications and AI workflows directly within Lambda.

AWS Lambda durable functions code

AWS Lambda durable functions code

Durable functions automatically checkpoint progress by saving the current state and completed steps at key points during execution. This allows them to suspend execution for up to one year during long-running tasks and recover from failures by resuming from the last checkpoint rather than restarting from the beginning, all without requiring additional infrastructure management.

Developers can now build in Python or TypeScript, wrap calls in steps with automatic retries and checkpointing. You can use waits to suspend execution for minutes, hours, or even up to a year without paying for idle compute. Durable functions use a replay mechanism to maintain state and handle failures gracefully. The replay mechanism works by re-executing your function code from checkpoints when recovering from failures, ensuring state consistency without data loss. This also means you don’t need complex external orchestration tools for many use cases. This can be helpful for AI workflows and multi-step applications where you need reliable state management without managing external infrastructure.

For more information, read the launch blog post and watch the re:Invent Breakout Session video: Deep Dive on AWS Lambda durable functions (CNS380)

AWS Lambda Managed Instances

Lambda now offers Lambda Managed Instances, a new compute option that combines Amazon EC2 flexibility with fully managed infrastructure. AWS automatically handles instance provisioning, scaling, and maintenance while allowing access to the full range of EC2 capabilities, including Graviton4, network-optimized instances, and other specialized compute options.

AWS Lambda Managed Instances configuration

AWS Lambda Managed Instances configuration

Your functions run on dedicated EC2 capacity from your account, in your own Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC). AWS still manages the operational overhead, including OS patching, load balancing, and auto-scaling. This gives you access to specialized hardware options while maintaining the serverless operational model. You can further improve costs by using EC2 pricing models, including Compute Savings Plans and Reserved Instances for Lambda workloads. Each instance can handle multiple concurrent requests, making this particularly valuable for high-volume, steady-state workloads where predictable pricing and specific hardware requirements matter.

For more information, read the launch blog post and watch the re:Invent Breakout Session video: Lambda Managed Instances: EC2 Power with Serverless Simplicity (CNS382).

Other Lambda announcements

Multi-tenant SaaS applications face challenges like data leakage between tenants and noisy neighbor effects where one tenant’s workload impacts others. They also struggle with implementing custom isolation mechanisms. Tenant isolation mode addresses these by processing function invocations in separate execution environments for each tenant. This manages tenant-level compute environment isolation automatically.

AWS Lambda tenant isolation

AWS Lambda tenant isolation

Lambda adds Provisioned Mode for Amazon SQS event-source mappings, providing predictable performance and reduced cold starts for high-throughput SQS processing workloads.

You can now send up to 1 MB of data in asynchronous Lambda invocations, increased from 256 KB, helping you build more complex data processing scenarios.

Lambda functions now support IPv6 networking, so you don’t need NAT Gateways when accessing the internet or other AWS services from VPC-connected functions.

Lambda internet connectivity through a NAT Gateway (IPv4) and Lambda internet connectivity through an egress-only internet gateway (IPv6).

Lambda internet connectivity through a NAT Gateway (IPv4) and Lambda internet connectivity through an egress-only internet gateway (IPv6).

Lambda Rust support is now generally available, moving from experimental status. This is backed by AWS Support and the Lambda availability SLA.

Lambda has expanded its runtime support by adding Python 3.14, Node.js 24, and Java 25 as both managed runtimes and container base images, providing access to the latest language features and ensuring long-term support.

Amazon ECS

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Express Mode streamlines the deployment and management of containerized applications by automating the infrastructure setup that traditionally slows down developers.

Amazon ECS Express Mode deployment

Amazon ECS Express Mode deployment

This means you can focus on building applications while deploying with confidence using AWS best practices. Express Mode lets you deploy production-ready containerized web applications and APIs with a single command. This automatically handles domains, networking, load balancing, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles, and auto-scaling through simplified APIs. When your applications evolve and require advanced features, you can seamlessly configure and access the full capabilities of the resources, including Amazon ECS. Learn more from the launch blog post.

Amazon ECS announced a public preview of a fully managed MCP server, enabling AI-powered experiences for development and operations. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) server provides enterprise-grade capabilities like automatic updates and patching, centralized security through AWS IAM integration, comprehensive audit logging via AWS CloudTrail, and the proven scalability, reliability, and support of AWS.

Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) managed container image signing enhances your security posture and eliminates the operational overhead of setting up signing. Container image signing allows you to verify that images are from trusted sources. ECR automatically signs images as they are pushed using the identity of the entity pushing the image. Signing operations are logged through CloudTrail for full auditability.

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway allows you to improve the responsiveness of your REST APIs by progressively streaming response payloads back to the client. With this new capability, you can use streamed responses to enhance user experience when building LLM-driven applications (such as AI agents and chatbots), improve time-to-first-byte (TTFB) performance for web and mobile applications, stream large files, and perform long-running operations while reporting incremental progress using protocols such as server-sent events (SSE).

Amazon API Gateway streaming

API Gateway introduces private integration with Application Load Balancers (ALBs). You can use this to expose your VPC-based applications securely through REST APIs without exposing your ALBs to the public internet.

You can also now configure enhanced TLS security policies on API endpoints and custom domain names, providing you with greater control over the security posture of your APIs.

Amazon EventBridge

Amazon EventBridge introduced an enhanced visual rule builder that helps developers discover and subscribe to events from custom applications and over 200 AWS services. The console-based interface integrates the EventBridge schema registry with a comprehensive event catalog and intuitive drag-and-drop canvas that simplifies building event-driven applications. Developers can browse and search through events with readily available sample payloads and schemas without having to hunt through individual service documentation. The schema-aware visual builder guides developers through creating event filter patterns and rules, reducing syntax errors and accelerating development time.

EventBridge also allows targeting SQS fair queues.

AWS Step Functions

AWS Step Functions allows for enhanced local testing through the TestState API, providing programmatic access to comprehensive testing capabilities without deploying to AWS. This helps you build automated test suites that validate your workflow definitions locally on your development machines. Test error handling patterns, data transformations, and mock service integrations using your preferred testing frameworks.

There is also a new metrics dashboard, giving you visibility into your workflow operations at both the account and state machine levels.

Other announcements

Savings Plans flexible pricing model extends to AWS managed database services with the launch of Database Savings Plans. This helps reduce database costs by up to 35% when committing to a consistent amount of usage ($/hour) over a 1-year term. Savings automatically apply each hour to eligible usage across supported database services, and additional usage beyond the commitment is billed at on-demand rates.

Amazon DynamoDB now supports multi-attribute composite keys in global secondary indexes. You no longer need to concatenate values into synthetic keys manually, which sometimes results in the need to backfill data before adding new indexes. Instead, you can create primary keys using up to eight existing attributes, making it easier to model diverse access patterns and adapt to new query requirements.

Amazon Bedrock introduced AgentCore with quality evaluations and policy controls for deploying trusted AI agents at scale.

Bedrock also added 18 fully managed open weight models, expanding AI model options for developers.

The Strands Agents SDK is an open source framework that takes a model-driven approach to building and running AI agents in just a few lines of code. TypeScript support is now available in preview so you can choose between Python and TypeScript for building Strands Agents.

Amazon S3 Vectors became generally available. S3 Vectors delivers purpose-built, cost-optimized vector storage for AI agents, inference, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), and semantic search at billion-vector scale.

Serverless blog posts

October

November

Serverless Office Hours

Join our livestream every Tuesday at 11 AM PT for live discussions, Q&A sessions, and deep dives into serverless technologies. Episodes are available on-demand at serverlessland.com/office-hours.

October

November

December

Still looking for more?

The Serverless landing page has overall information about building serverless applications. The Lambda resources page contains case studies, webinars, whitepapers, customer stories, reference architectures, and even more Getting Started tutorials.

You can also follow the Serverless Developer Advocacy team to see the latest news, follow conversations, and interact with the team.

And finally, visit Serverless Land for all your serverless needs.

Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) across AWS services

Post Syndicated from Abhishek Avinash Agawane original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/implementing-http-strict-transport-security-hsts-across-aws-services/

Modern web applications built on Amazon Web Services (AWS) often span multiple services to deliver scalable, performant solutions. However, customers encounter challenges when implementing a cohesive HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) strategy across these distributed architectures.

Customers face fragmented security implementation challenges because different AWS services require distinct approaches to HSTS configuration, leading to inconsistent security postures.Applications using Amazon API Gateway for APIs, Amazon CloudFront for content delivery, and Application load balancers for web traffic lack unified HSTS policies, leading to complex multi-service environments. Security scanners flag missing HSTS headers, but remediation guidance is scattered across service-specific documentation, causing security compliance gaps.

HSTS is a web security policy mechanism that protects websites against protocol downgrade attacks and cookie hijacking. When properly implemented, HSTS instructs browsers to interact with applications exclusively through HTTPS connections, providing critical protection against man-in-the-middle issues.

This post provides a comprehensive approach to implementing HSTS across key AWS services that form the foundation of modern cloud applications:

  1. Amazon API Gateway: Secure REST and HTTP APIs with centralized header management
  2. Application Load Balancer: Infrastructure-level HSTS enforcement for web applications
  3. Amazon CloudFront: Edge-based security header delivery for global content

By following the implementation steps in this post, you can establish a unified HSTS strategy that aligns with AWS Well-Architected Framework security principles while maintaining optimal application performance.

Understanding HSTS security and its benefits

HTTP Strict Transport Security is a web security policy mechanism that helps protect websites against protocol downgrade attacks and cookie hijacking. When a web server declares HSTS policy through the Strict-Transport-Security header, compliant browsers automatically convert HTTP requests to HTTPS for the specified domain. This enforcement occurs at the browser level, providing protection even before the initial request reaches your infrastructure.

HSTS enforcement applies specifically to web browser clients. Most programmatic clients (such as SDKs, command line tools, or application-to-application communication) don’t enforce HSTS policies. For comprehensive security, configure your applications and infrastructure to only use HTTPS connections regardless of client type rather than relying solely on HSTS for protocol enforcement.

HTTP to HTTPS redirection enforcement on the server ensures future requests reach your applications over encrypted connections. However, it leaves a security gap during the initial browser request. Understanding this gap helps explain why client-side HSTS serves as an essential security layer in modern web applications.

For example, when users access web applications, the typical flow with redirects configured is as follows:

  1. User enters example.com in their browser.
  2. Browser sends an HTTP request to http://example.com.
  3. Server responds with HTTP 301/302 redirect to https://example.com.
  4. Browser follows redirection and establishes HTTPS connection

The initial HTTP request in step 2 creates an opportunity for protocol downgrade issues. An unauthorized party positioned between the user and your infrastructure can intercept this request and respond with content that appears legitimate while maintaining an insecure connection. This technique, known as SSL stripping, can occur even when your server-side AWS infrastructure is properly configured with HTTPS redirects.

HSTS addresses this security gap by moving security enforcement to the browser level. After a browser receives an HSTS policy, it automatically converts HTTP requests to HTTPS before sending them over the network:

  1. User enters example.com in browser.
  2. Browser automatically converts to HTTPS due to stored HSTS policy.
  3. Browser sends HTTPS request directly to https://example.com.
  4. No initial HTTP request removes the opportunity for interception.

This browser-level enforcement provides protection that complements your AWS infrastructure security configurations, creating defense in depth against protocol downgrade issues.

Although current browsers warn about insecure connections, HSTS provides programmatic enforcement. This prevents unauthorized parties from exploiting the security gap because they can’t forge valid HTTPS certificates for protected domains.

The security benefits of HSTS extend beyond simple protocol enforcement. HSTS helps prevent protocol downgrade issues after HSTS policy is established in the browser. It mitigates against man-in-the-middle issues, preventing unauthorized parties from intercepting communications. It also helps prevent unauthorized session access to protect against credential theft and unintended session access.
HSTS requires HTTPS connections and removes the option to bypass certificate warnings.

This post focuses exclusively on implementing the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security header. Although the examples include additional security headers for completeness, detailed configuration of those headers is beyond the scope of this post.

Key use cases for HSTS implementation

HSTS protects scenarios that HTTP redirects miss. For example, when legacy systems serve mixed content, or when SSO flows redirect users between providers, HSTS keeps connections encrypted throughout.

Applications serving both modern HTTPS content and legacy HTTP resources face protocol downgrade risks. When users access example.com/app that loads resources from legacy.example.com, HSTS prevents browsers from making initial HTTP requests to any subdomain, eliminating the vulnerability window during resource loading.

SSO implementations redirecting users between identity providers and applications create multiple HTTP request opportunities. Due to HSTS, authentication tokens and session data remain encrypted throughout the entire SSO flow, preventing credential interception during provider redirects.

Microservices architectures using API Gateway often involve service-to-service communication and client redirects. HSTS protects API endpoints from protocol downgrade during initial client connections, which means that API keys and authentication headers are not transmitted over HTTP.

Applications using CloudFront with multiple origin servers face security challenges when origins change or fail over. HSTS prevents browsers from falling back to HTTP when accessing cached content or during origin failover scenarios, maintaining encryption even during infrastructure changes.

From an AWS Well-Architected perspective, implementing HSTS demonstrates adherence to the defense in depth principle by adding an additional layer of security at the application protocol level. This approach complements other AWS security services and features, creating a comprehensive security posture that helps to protect data both in transit and at rest.

Implementing HSTS with Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway lacks built-in features to enable HSTS for the API resources. There are several different ways to configure HSTS headers in HTTP APIs and REST APIs.
For HTTP APIs, you can configure response parameter mapping to set HSTS headers when it’s invoked using a default endpoint or custom domain.

To configure response parameter mapping:

  1. Navigate to your desired HTTP API’s route configuration in the AWS API Gateway console
  2. Access the route’s integration settings under Manage integrations tab.
Figure 1: Integration settings of the HTTP Api

Figure 1: Integration settings of the HTTP Api

  1. To configure parameter mapping, under Response key, enter 200.
  2. Under Modification type, select Append in the dropdown menu.
  3. Under “Parameter to modify”, enter header.Strict-Transport-Security
  4. Under Value, enter max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.
Figure 2: Parameter Mapping for the HTTP Api integration

Figure 2: Parameter Mapping for the HTTP Api integration

REST APIs in Amazon API Gateway offer more granular control over HSTS implementation through both proxy and non-proxy integration patterns.

For proxy integrations, the backend service assumes responsibility for HSTS header generation. For example, an AWS Lambda proxy integration must return the HSTS headers in its response as shown in the following code example:

import json 
def lambda_handler(event, context):     
	return {         
        'statusCode': 200,         
        'headers': {             
            'Strict-Transport-Security': 'max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload'         
        },         
        'body': json.dumps('Secure response with HSTS headers')     
    }

For non-proxy integrations, the HSTS headers must be returned by the Rest API by implementing one of two methods, either mapping templates or method response.

In the mapping templates method, the mapping template is used to configure the HSTS headers. The Velocity Template Language (VTL) for the mapping template is used for dynamic header generation. To implement this method:

  1. Navigate to the desired REST API and click on the method for the desired resource.
  2. Under the ‘Integration response’ tab, use the following mapping template to set the response headers:
$input.json("$") 
#set($newValue = "$input.params().header.get('Host')") 
#set($context.responseOverride.header.Strict-Transport-Security 
= "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload")

Figure 3: Adding mapping template to integration response of the Rest Api

Figure 3: Adding mapping template to integration response of the Rest Api

The ‘Method response’ tab provides declarative configuration through explicit header mapping in the configuration. To implement this method:

  1. Navigate to your desired REST API and select the method for the desired resource.
  2. Choose Method response and under Header name, add the HSTS header strict-transport-security.
Figure 4: Method response of the Rest Api

Figure 4: Method response of the Rest Api

3. Choose Integration response and under Header mappings, enter the HSTS header strict-transport-security. Add the Mapping value for the header as max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

Figure 5: Integration response of the Rest Api

Figure 5: Integration response of the Rest Api

To test and validate, use the following command:

Verify HSTS implementation for both HTTP API and REST API using curl with response headers logged:

curl -i https://your-api-gateway-url.execute-
api.region.amazonaws.com/stage/resource

The expected response should include:

HTTP/2 200 

date: Tue, 20 Sep 2025 16:34:35 GMT 
content-type: application/json 
content-length: 3 
x-amzn-requestid: 76543210-9aaa-4bbb-accc-987654321012
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload 
x-amz-apigw-id: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO

Implementing HSTS with AWS Application Load Balancers

Application Load Balancers now provide built-in support for HTTP response header modification, including HSTS headers. This lets you enforce consistent security policies across all your services from a single point, reducing development effort and ensuring uniform protection regardless of which backend technologies you’re using.

Prerequisites and infrastructure requirements

Before implementing HSTS with load balancers, ensure your infrastructure meets these requirements:

  • Functional HTTPS listener – The ALB listener must be configured with HTTPS correctly.
  • Valid certificates – The ALB listener must have proper TLS certificate chain in AWS Certificate Manager and validation.
  • Application Load Balancer – The header modification feature for the ALB must be enabled for the listener since it is turned off by default.

Configuration

Application Load Balancers support direct HSTS header injection through the response header modification feature. This approach provides centralized security policy enforcement without requiring individual application configuration.

To enable HTTP header modification for your Application Load Balancer:

  1. Open the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) console and navigate to Load Balancers.
  2. Select your Application Load Balancer.
  3. On the Listeners and rules tab, select the HTTPS listener.
  4. On the Attributes tab, choose Edit.
    Figure 6: ALB HTTPS listener Attributes configuration

    Figure 6: ALB HTTPS listener Attributes configuration

  5. Expand the Add response headers section.
  6. Select Add HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) header.
  7. To configure the header value, enter max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.
  8. Choose Save changes.
Figure 7: Add response headers in attributes configuration of the ALB HTTPS listener

Figure 7: Add response headers in attributes configuration of the ALB HTTPS listener

Header modification behavior

When ALB header modification is enabled:

  • Header addition – If the backend response doesn’t include the specified header, ALB adds it with the configured value
  • Header override – If the backend response includes the header, ALB replaces the existing value with the configured value
  • Centralized control – Responses from the load balancer include the configured security headers, ensuring consistent policy enforcement

To test and validate, use the following command:
curl -I https://my-loadbalancer-1234567890.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com

The following code example shows the expected response headers:

HTTP/2 200
date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:34:35 GMT
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

Header value constraints:

  • Maximum header value size – 1 KB
  • Supported characters – Alphanumeric (a-z, A-Z, 0-9) and special characters (_ :;.,/’?!(){}[]@<>=-+*#&`|~^%)
  • Empty values revert to default behavior (no header modification)

When implementing header modifications, there are several operational considerations to keep in mind. Header modification must be explicitly enabled on each listener where you want the functionality to work. Once enabled, any changes you configure will apply to all responses that come from the load balancer, affecting every request processed through that listener. Application Load Balancer performs basic input validation on the headers you configure, but it has limited capability for header-specific validation, so you should ensure your header configurations follow proper formatting and standards.

This built-in Application Load Balancer capability significantly simplifies HSTS implementation by eliminating the need for backend application modifications while providing centralized security policy enforcement across your entire application infrastructure.

Implementing HSTS with Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront provides built-in support for HTTP security headers, including HSTS, through response headers policies. This feature enables centralized security header management at the CDN edge, providing consistent policy enforcement across cached and non-cached content.

Response headers policy configuration

You can use the CloudFront response headers policy feature to configure security headers that are automatically added to responses served by your distribution. You can use managed response headers policies that include predefined values for the most common HTTP security headers. Or, you can create a custom response header policy with custom security headers and values that you can add to the required CloudFront behavior.

To configure security headers:

  1. On the CloudFront console, navigate to Policies and then Response headers.
  2. Choose Create response headers policy.
  3. Configure policy settings:
    • NameHSTS-Security-Policy
    • Description – HSTS and security headers for web applications
  4. Under Security headers, configure:
    • Strict Transport Security – Select
    • Max age – 31,536,000 seconds (1 year)
    • Preload – Select (optional)
    • IncludeSubDomains – Select (optional)
  5. Add additional security headers:

    • X-Content-Type-Options
    • X-Frame-Options – Select Origin as “SAMEORIGIN”
    • Referrer-Policy – Select “strict-origin-when-cross-origin”
    • X-XSS-Protection – Select “Enabled”, Tick “Block”
    • Choose Create.
Figure 8: Configuring response header policy for the Cloudfront distribution

Figure 8: Configuring response header policy for the Cloudfront distribution

To attach the policy to the distribution:

  1. Navigate to your CloudFront distribution.
  2. Select the Behaviors tab.
  3. Edit the default behavior (or create a new one).
  4. Under Response headers policy, select your created policy.
  5. Choose Save changes.
Figure 9: Selecting the response headers policy

Figure 9: Selecting the response headers policy

Header override behavior:
CloudFront response headers policies provide origin override functionality that controls how headers are managed between the origin and CloudFront. When origin override is enabled, CloudFront will replace existing headers that come from the origin server. Conversely, when origin override is disabled, CloudFront will only add the policy-defined headers if those same headers are not already present in the origin response, preserving the original headers from the source.

To test and validate, use the following command:

curl -I https://your-cloudfront-domain.cloudfront.net

The following code example shows the expected response headers:

HTTP/2 200 
date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:34:35 GMT 
strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload 
x-content-type-options: nosniff 
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN 
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin 
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block 
x-cache: Hit from cloudfront

Using CloudFront has several advantages. It offers consistent header application across all content types and centralized security policy management. Edge-level enforcement reduces latency, and no origin server modifications are required. AWS edge locations offer global policy distribution.

Security considerations and best practices

Implementing HSTS requires careful consideration of several security implications and operational requirements.

The max-age directive determines how long browsers will enforce HTTPS-only access. The duration guidelines are as follows:

  • 300 seconds (5 minutes) – Safe for experimentation during initial testing phase.
  • 86,400 seconds (1 day) – For short-term commitment such as development environments.
  • 259,2000 seconds (30 days) – For medium-term validation such as staging environments.
  • 31,536,000 seconds (1 year) – For long-term commitment such as production environments.

We recommend that you start with shorter max-age values during initial implementation and gradually increase them as you gain confidence in your HTTPS infrastructure stability.

The includeSubDomains directive extends HSTS enforcement to all subdomains. It offers several benefits, including comprehensive protection across the entire domain hierarchy, prevention of subdomain-based attacks, and simplified security policy management.

Requirements for using this directive include:

  • Subdomains should support HTTPS to use this directive effectively.
  • Subdomains should have valid SSL certificates.
  • You must maintain a consistent security policy across domain hierarchy.

Consider implementing HSTS preloading for maximum security coverage:

Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

Preloading benefits include protection for first-time visitors, browser-level enforcement before network requests, and maximizing security coverage.

The following are some preloading considerations:

  • It requires submission to browser preload lists.
  • It’s difficult to reverse because removal takes months.
  • It requires long-term commitment to HTTPS infrastructure.

For more information, see:

Conclusion

Implementing HSTS across AWS services provides a robust foundation for securing web applications against protocol downgrade attacks and enabling encrypted communications. By using the built-in capabilities of API Gateway, CloudFront, and Application Load Balancers, organizations can create comprehensive security policies that align with AWS Well-Architected Framework principles.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Abhishek Avinash Agawane
Abhishek Avinash Agawane

Abhishek is a Security Consultant at Amazon Web Services with more than 8 years of industry experience. He helps organizations architect resilient, secure, and efficient cloud environments, guiding them through complex challenges and large-scale infrastructure transformations. He has helped numerous organizations enhance their cloud operations through targeted optimizations, robust architectures, and best-practice implementations.

Enhancing API security with Amazon API Gateway TLS security policies

Post Syndicated from Anton Aleksandrov original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/enhancing-api-security-with-amazon-api-gateway-tls-security-policies/

As compliance frameworks evolve and cryptographic standards advance, organizations are looking for additional controls to improve their cloud security posture. One of the neccesary controls is a more granular TLS configuration, for example when regulatory requirements mandate disabling older ciphers like CBC or enforcing TLS 1.3 as a minimum version.

In this post, you will learn how the new Amazon API Gateway’s enhanced TLS security policies help you meet standards such as PCI DSS, Open Banking, and FIPS, while strengthening how your APIs handle TLS negotiation. This new capability increases your security posture without adding operational complexity, and provides you with a single, consistent way to standardize TLS configuration across your API Gateway infrastructure.

Overview

Previously, API Gateway offered limited control over TLS configuration, and only for custom domain names. Default endpoints used fixed security policies, which meant you often had to introduce additional infrastructure, such as custom Amazon CloudFront distributions, to meet your organization’s security or compliance requirements.

With this launch, you can configure TLS behavior directly on all REST API endpoint types, including Regional, edge-optimized, and private, and apply consistent TLS settings across both your APIs and their custom domain names. You can choose from predefined enhanced security policies to enforce the minimum TLS versions and cipher suites that your workloads require. For example, you can enforce TLS 1.3, use hardened TLS 1.2 without CBC ciphers, adopt FIPS-aligned suites for government workloads, or prepare for the future with policies that include post-quantum cryptography (PQC). The new security policies provide finer-grained control without adding operational complexity, helping you align your APIs with evolving security and compliance expectations.

Understanding API Gateway security policies

A security policy in API Gateway is a predefined combination of a minimum TLS version and a curated set of cipher suites. When a client connects to your REST API or custom domain name, API Gateway uses the selected policy to determine which protocol versions and ciphers it will accept during the TLS handshake. This gives you a predictable and enforceable way to control how clients establish encrypted connections to your APIs.

API Gateway supports two categories of security policies. Legacy policies, such as TLS_1_0 or TLS_1_2, remain available for backwards compatibility. Enhanced policies, identified by the SecurityPolicy_* prefix, provide stricter and more modern controls for regulated workloads, advanced governance, or cryptographic hardening. When you use an enhanced policy, you must also specify an endpoint access mode, which adds additional validation for how traffic reaches your API, as described in the following sections.

Enhanced policies follow a consistent naming patterns that helps you quickly understand what each policy enforces. For example, for REGIONAL and PRIVATE endpoint types, the following pattern applies:

SecurityPolicy_[TLS-Versions]_[Variant]_[YYYY-MM]

From this structure, you can identify the minimum TLS versions supported, any specialized cryptographic variants (such as FIPS, PFS, or PQ), and the release date of the policy. For example, SecurityPolicy_TLS13_1_3_2025_09 accepts only TLS 1.3 traffic, while SecurityPolicy_TLS13_1_2_PFS_PQ_2025_09 supports TLS 1.2 as lowest and TLS 1.3 as highest TLS version with forward secrecy and post-quantum enhancements.

Each policy maps to a curated combination of ciphers. For instance, SecurityPolicy_TLS13_1_3_2025_09 accepts only three TLS 1.3 cipher suites (TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256, TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, and TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256) and rejects any other protocol versions or ciphers. For a full list of supported policies and ciphers, and naming pattern for the EDGE endpont type, see the API Gateway documentation.

How security policies apply to default endpoints and custom domains

You can use API Gateway to attach different security policies to your default API endpoint and custom domain names. During TLS negotiation, API Gateway selects the policy based on the Server Name Indication (SNI) value in the client’s TLS handshake, not the HTTP Host header. This means the policy depends on the hostname the client uses when initiating TLS.

For example, if a client connects directly to your default endpoint, such as:

https://abcdef1234.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com

API Gateway uses the policy attached to that default endpoint because the SNI value matches its hostname.

If the client instead connects through a custom domain name, such as:

https://api.example.com

API Gateway uses the policy attached to that custom domain. In this case, the SNI value api.example.com determines which policy is enforced.

This distinction is important even if you disable your default endpoint. TLS negotiation always occurs before API Gateway evaluates endpoint settings, so the default endpoint security policy still applies to clients that connect directly to its hostname. To avoid unexpected client behavior, you should keep the API and its custom domain name aligned with the same security policy whenever possible.

Understanding endpoint access mode

When you use an enhanced security policy (SecurityPolicy_*), you must also specify an endpoint access mode. Endpoint access mode defines how strictly API Gateway validates the network path a request takes before it reaches your API. This gives you an additional layer of governance and helps you prevent unauthorized or misrouted traffic.

You can choose between two modes:

  • BASIC mode provides standard API Gateway behavior. It is the recommended starting point when you migrate an existing API to an enhanced security policy. Clients can continue reaching your API as they do today, without additional validation.
  • STRICT mode adds enforcement checks to ensure that requests originate from the correct endpoint type, and TLS negotiation aligns with your configuration.

When you enable STRICT mode, API Gateway performs additional validations, such as:

  • The SNI and HTTP Host header values match
  • The request originates from the same endpoint type as your API (Regional, edge-optimized, or private)

If any of these validations fail, API Gateway rejects the request. STRICT is a viable choice when you need stronger security guarantees, such as when running regulated or sensitive workloads. See API Gateway documentation for additional details.

When you switch from BASIC to STRICT mode, it takes up to 15 minutes for the change to fully propagate. Your API remains available during this period. If your endpoint access mode is set to STRICT, you cannot change the endpoint type until you revert the mode back to BASIC.

Applying security policies to new and existing APIs

You can apply a security policy when you create a new REST API or custom domain name, or update an existing resource to use one of the enhanced SecurityPolicy_* options. When migrating existing APIs, the recommended approach is to start with BASIC mode, validate client behavior (SNI and HTTP Host header values match, request originates from the same endpoint type as your API), and then move to STRICT mode once you confirm compatibility.

The following code snippets illustrate how to apply security policies to different scenarios:

Create a REST API with a security policy and STRICT endpoint access mode

You can attach a security policy directly during API creation, removing the need for extra infrastructure just to control TLS negotiation.

aws apigateway create-rest-api \
  --name "your-private-api-name" \
  --endpoint-configuration '{"types":["PRIVATE"]}' \
  --security-policy "SecurityPolicy_TLS13_1_3_2025_09" \
  --endpoint-access-mode STRICT \
  --policy file://api-policy.json

Create a custom domain name with a security policy and STRICT endpoint access mode

You can also specify the security policy when creating a custom domain name. API Gateway applies the selected policy during TLS negotiation based on the SNI value the client provides.

aws apigateway create-domain-name \
  --domain-name api.example.com \
  --regional-certificate-arn arn:aws:acm:region:account-id:certificate/certificate-id \
  --endpoint-configuration '{"types":["REGIONAL"]}' \
  --security-policy SecurityPolicy_TLS13_1_3_2025_09 \
  --endpoint-access-mode STRICT

Updating existing REST API

If you are migrating an existing API, start by applying the enhanced security policy with BASIC mode. After confirming that your clients can connect with BASIC mode as expected, proceed to enable the STRICT mode.

1. Apply the new policy with BASIC mode

aws apigateway update-rest-api --rest-api-id abcd123 --patch-operations '[
    {
         "op": "replace",
         "path": "/securityPolicy",
         "value": "SecurityPolicy_TLS13_1_3_2025_09"
    },
    {
         "op": "replace",
         "path": "/endpointAccessMode",
         "value": "BASIC"
     }
]'

Verify your clients can consume the API as expected using access logs and performance metrics in Amazon CloudWatch.

2. Enable the STRICT mode after validation

aws apigateway update-rest-api --rest-api-id abcd123 --patch-operations '[
    {
        "op": "replace",
        "path": "/endpointAccessMode",
        "value": "STRICT"
     }
]'

Updating existing custom domain name

Custom domain names follow the same migration approach as REST APIs.

1. Apply the new policy with BASIC mode and validate clients can successfully connect.

aws apigateway update-domain-name --domain-name api.example.com --patch-operations '[
    {
        "op": "replace",
        "path": "/securityPolicy",
        "value": "SecurityPolicy_TLS13_1_3_2025_09"
    },
    {
        "op": "replace",
        "path": "/endpointAccessMode",
        "value": "BASIC"
     }
]'

2. Enable the STRICT mode after validation

aws apigateway update-domain-name --domain-name api.example.com --patch-operations '[
    {
        "op": "replace",
        "path": "/endpointAccessMode",
        "value": "STRICT"
     }
]'

After you update your REST API or custom domain configuration, redeploy your API so that stages receive the new settings. When you change a security policy, the update takes up to 15 minutes to complete. The API status appears as UPDATING while the change propagates and returns to AVAILABLE when complete. Your API remains fully functional throughout this process.

Rolling back endpoint access mode

If you notice clients failing to connect to your API after applying the STRICT mode, you can revert the endpoint access mode back to BASIC at any time. Below code snippet illustrates doing this for a REST API.

aws apigateway update-rest-api --rest-api-id abcd123 --patch-operations '[
    {
      "op": "replace",
      "path": "/endpointAccessMode",
      "value": "BASIC"
    }
  ]'

You can use the same approach to update a custom domain name.

Monitoring TLS usage and policy migrations

As you adopt enhanced security policies, it is important to understand how clients negotiate encrypted connections with your API. Monitoring helps you verify client readiness, identify legacy consumers that may require updates, and validate that STRICT endpoint access mode behaves as expected during rollout. Use the following API Gateway access logs variables to monitor protocol and cipher usage over time.

  • $context.tlsVersion – the negotiated TLS version
  • $context.cipherSuite – the cipher suite selected during the handshake

You can use these variables to confirm that:

  • Clients are using the expected minimum TLS version
  • BC-based ciphers are no longer used after you move to a hardened policy
  • PQC and FIPS-aligned policies are being exercised by the appropriate clients

Access logs are especially useful during migrations, where validating the actual client behavior is a prerequisite before enabling STRICT mode. For example, if you still observe live clients negotiating TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.2 CBC ciphers after applying a hardened policy in BASIC mode, you can identify the affected clients and plan remediation before switching to STRICT mode.

Future-proof security configurations

Some of the new policies combine TLS 1.3 with post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to help you prepare for a future where quantum-capable threat actors exist. With these policies you can start testing and adopting quantum-resistant algorithms without redesigning your API architecture.

As standards evolve and new cipher suites are introduced, API Gateway’s policy model provides you with a clear path for adding new variants while keeping your configuration simple and predictable.

Conclusion and next steps

Enhanced TLS security policies and endpoint access mode in the Amazon API Gateway gives you direct control over how clients establish secure connections to your APIs. You can choose the policies that match your compliance needs, such as PCI DSS, FIPS, Open Banking, PQC, and use STRICT mode to control how traffic reaches your endpoints and apply additional domain-level validations, further hardening security of your APIs

To get started:

  1. Review the list of available security policies in the API Gateway documentation.
  2. Identify which REST APIs and domains require stronger TLS controls.
  3. Apply an appropriate SecurityPolicy-* policy with BASIC mode.
  4. Validate client behavior using access logs and CloudWatch metrics.
  5. Move to STRICT mode when you are ready to enforce additional connection-level protection.

For more information about building Serverless architectures, see ServerlessLand.com

Build scalable REST APIs using Amazon API Gateway private integration with Application Load Balancer

Post Syndicated from Christian Silva original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/build-scalable-rest-apis-using-amazon-api-gateway-private-integration-with-application-load-balancer/

This post is written by Vijay Menon, Principal Solutions Architect, and Christian Silva, Senior Solutions Architect.

Today, we announced Amazon API Gateway REST API’s support for private integration with Application Load Balancers (ALBs). You can use this new capability to securely expose your VPC-based applications through your REST APIs without exposing your ALBs to the public internet.

Prior to this launch, if you wanted to connect API Gateway to private ALBs, you would have had to use a Network Load Balancer (NLB) as an intermediary, increasing cost and complexity. Now, you can directly integrate API Gateway with private ALBs without requiring an NLB, reducing operational overhead and optimizing cost.

Previous architecture: Connecting API Gateway to private ALBs

Before this launch, API Gateway REST APIs connect to private ALB resources through an NLB positioned in front of the ALB. Many customers have successfully built and operated production workloads using this architecture, demonstrating its reliability for business-critical applications. The following architecture demonstrates this setup.

Figure 1. Previous architecture: API Gateway to private ALB via intermediary NLB

In response to customer feedback for a simplified architecture and reduced costs, we’ve extended VPC link v2 support to REST APIs. This feature now enables direct private ALB integration for REST APIs, eliminating the need for an intermediary NLB.

New architecture: Connecting API Gateway to private ALBs

With direct private ALB integration, this architecture becomes simpler and more efficient. The integration removes the need for an intermediate NLB, reducing the number of hops between client and your services. This streamlined setup simplifies the architecture for applications, allowing more efficient use of ALB’s layer-7 load-balancing capabilities, authentication, and authorization features. While these ALB features were technically accessible before, the new architecture removes the overhead and complexity of managing an additional NLB. Here’s how the simplified architecture looks now:

Figure 2. Direct integration between API Gateway and private ALB

Benefits of a direct integration between your API Gateway endpoint and your private ALB

  • Architectural simplification and operational excellence: Now that your API Gateway can directly connect to your private ALB, you no longer need an NLB to act as a bridge between your API Gateway and your private ALB. This eliminates the need to provision, configure, manage, or monitor an intermediate load balancer. The reduction in infrastructure components translates to reduced operational overhead and fewer potential failure points. Traffic flows directly from API Gateway to your ALB within the Amazon Web Services (AWS) network, reducing network hops and latency.
  • Improved scalability: VPC link v2 supports a one-to-many relationship with load balancers. A single VPC link v2 allows API Gateway to integrate with multiple ALBs or NLBs within your VPC. This architectural advantage is particularly valuable for organizations managing complex applications with multiple microservices, each potentially behind its own ALB, or those running numerous APIs. The ability to consolidate multiple load balancer connections through a single VPC link not only reduces administrative overhead but also provides greater flexibility in scaling your architecture. As your application grows and you add more services or load balancers, you won’t need to provision additional VPC links, making it easier to expand your infrastructure while maintaining operational efficiency.
  • Cost optimization: You can remove the NLB from your architecture and thereby eliminate both the hourly charges for running the NLB and the associated Network Load Balancer Capacity Units (NLCU) used per hour. For organizations running multiple environments or numerous APIs, these savings can accumulate to thousands of dollars annually. Moreover, your data transfer patterns become more efficient. Traffic flows directly from API Gateway to your ALB within the AWS network, which avoids any unnecessary hops that could incur more data transfer charges. This streamlined path not only reduces costs but also improves performance by minimizing network latency.

Getting started

This tutorial demonstrates the setup using both the AWS Management Console and AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI). Before you begin, make sure that you have an internal ALB configured in your VPC. For resources that need naming, use appropriate names for your environment.

Step 1: Create a VPC link v2
The first step in our process is to create a VPC link v2, which will enable API Gateway to route traffic to your internal ALB. Here’s how to set it up:

  1. Navigate to the API Gateway console.
  2. In the left navigation pane, choose VPC links.
  3. Choose Create VPC link.
  4. Choose VPC link v2 as the VPC link type.
  5. Provide a descriptive name for your VPC link.
  6. Choose your VPC and subnets where your ALB resides. For high availability, choose subnets in multiple AWS Availability Zones (AZs) that match your ALB configuration.
  7. Assign one or more security groups to your VPC link. These security groups will control the traffic flow between API Gateway and your VPC.
  8. Choose Create and wait for the VPC link status to become Available. This process can take a few minutes.

Alternatively, you can create a VPC link v2 using the AWS CLI:

# Create VPC link v2
aws apigatewayv2 create-vpc-link \
    --name "test-vpc-link-v2" \
    --subnet-ids "<your-subnet1-id>" "<your-subnet2-id>" \
    --security-group-ids "<your-security-group-id>" \
    --region <your-AWS-region>

# Check VPC link v2 status
aws apigatewayv2 get-vpc-link \
    --vpc-link-id "<your-vpc-link-v2-id>" \
    --region <your-AWS-region>

Step 2: Create a REST API and configure integration
With your VPC link v2 now available, the next step is to create a REST API and configure it to use the VPC Link. This process involves creating the API, setting up resources and methods, and configuring the integration with your internal ALB.

  1. In the API Gateway console, choose Create API.
  2. Choose REST API.
  3. Enter an API name and choose Create API.
  4. Create a new resource by choosing Actions, then choose Create resource. This resource will represent the endpoint for your API.
  5. Create a method by choosing Actions, then choose Create method. The method defines the type of request your API will accept (GET, POST, etc.).
  6. Now, configure the integration. This is where you’ll connect your API to your internal ALB via the VPC link v2:
    1. Choose VPC link as the integration type.
    2. Choose the HTTP method for your backend integration.
    3. Choose your newly created VPC link v2.
    4. Specify your ALB as the Integration target.
    5. Enter the endpoint URL for your integration. The port specified in the URL is used to route requests to the backend.
    6. Set the Integration timeout.

Using the AWS CLI:

# Create REST API
aws apigateway create-rest-api \
    --name "test-rest-api" \
    --description "REST API integration with internal ALB via VPC link v2" \
    --region <your-AWS-region>

# Get REST API’s root resource ID
aws apigateway get-resources \
    --rest-api-id "<your-rest-api-id>" \
    --region <your-AWS-region>

# Create a new resource
aws apigateway create-resource \
    --rest-api-id "<your-rest-api-id>" \
    --parent-id "<your-parent-id>" \
    --path-part "internal-alb" \ 
    --region <your-AWS-region>

# Create a new method
aws apigateway put-method \
    --rest-api-id "<your-rest-api-id>" \
    --resource-id "<your-resource-id>" \
    --http-method ANY \
    --authorization-type NONE \
    --region <your-AWS-region>

# Create the integration
aws apigateway put-integration \
    --rest-api-id "<your-rest-api-id>" \
    --resource-id "<your-resource-id>" \
    --http-method ANY \
    --type HTTP_PROXY \
    --integration-http-method ANY \
    --uri "http://test-internal-alb.com/test" \
    --connection-type VPC_LINK \
    --connection-id "<your-vpc-link-v2-id>" \
    --integration-target "<your-ALB-arn>" \
    --region <your-AWS-region>

Step 3: Deploy and test
With your API configured, it’s time to deploy it and verify that it’s working correctly.

  1. Choose Deploy API to create a new deployment of your API.
  2. Create a new stage (for example “test”). Stages allow you to manage multiple versions of your API.
  3. After deployment, you’ll receive an API endpoint URL. Copy this URL as you’ll need it for testing.

Test your API using your preferred API client or a simple curl command.

Using the AWS CLI:

# Create a new deployment to a test stage
aws apigateway create-deployment \
    --rest-api-id "<your-rest-api-id>" \
    --stage-name "test" \
    --region <your-AWS-region>

Test your API integration using a curl command:

curl https://<rest-api-id>.execute-api.<your-aws-region>.amazonaws.com/internal-alb
{"message": "Hello from internal ALB"}

Step 4: Scale your VPC link v2
A single VPC link can now connect to multiple ALBs or NLBs within your VPC, simplifying infrastructure management. This AWS CLI snippet demonstrates API Gateway integrating with multiple internal services, for example orders and payments services, each behind its own ALB, using a single VPC link v2. Note how the same VPC link ID is used across both integrations.

# Orders service integration (ALB-1)
aws apigateway put-integration \
    --rest-api-id "<your-rest-api-id>" \
    --resource-id "<orders-resource-id>" \
    --http-method ANY \
    --type HTTP_PROXY \
    --integration-http-method ANY \
    --uri "<your-orders-alb-endpoint>" \
    --connection-type VPC_LINK \
    --connection-id "<your-vpc-link-v2-id>" \
    --integration-target "<your-orders-alb-arn>" \
    --region "<your-aws-region>"

# Payments service integration (ALB-2)
aws apigateway put-integration \
    --rest-api-id "<your-rest-api-id>" \
    --resource-id "<payments-resource-id>" \
    --http-method ANY \
    --type HTTP_PROXY \
    --integration-http-method ANY \
    --uri "<your-payments-alb-endpoint>" \
    --connection-type VPC_LINK \
    --connection-id "<your-vpc-link-v2-id>" \
    --integration-target "<your-payments-alb-arn>" \
    --region "<your-aws-region>"

For a detailed, step-by-step guide, please see our official documentation in the API Gateway Developer Guide.

Use cases

Private ALB integration with API Gateway enables architectural patterns that solve enterprise challenges. These are three key scenarios where organizations can use this new capability:

  • Microservices on Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS: Exposing microservices running on Amazon ECS or Amazon EKS becomes simpler with this integration. It allows secure, path-based routing to different services without exposing your ALB to the public internet or using complex NLB proxy patterns.
  • Hybrid cloud architectures: Seamless and secure connectivity between cloud-native APIs and on-premises resources is achieved via AWS Direct Connect or AWS Site-to-Site VPN. This setup allows flexible routing based on HTTP methods and headers to various internal systems.
  • Enterprise modernization: Gradual application modernization is facilitated by enabling phased migration from monolithic architectures to microservices. Organizations can route traffic between legacy and new components while maintaining operational continuity and minimizing risk.

Conclusion

Direct private integration between API Gateway REST APIs and ALBs enhances API architecture on AWS. By simplifying infrastructure and reducing operational overhead, this capability improves performance and efficiency for API-driven applications.

This feature is available today in all AWS Regions where VPC link v2 and ALBs are present. We can’t wait to see what you build with it and how it transforms your API architectures. Get started now by visiting the API Gateway console and creating your first VPC link v2 for direct ALB integration.

For more information, visit the API Gateway product page, review our pricing details, and explore the comprehensive developer documentation to learn about all the powerful features available to help you build world-class APIs on AWS.

Serverless strategies for streaming LLM responses

Post Syndicated from KyungYong Shim original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/serverless-strategies-for-streaming-llm-responses/

Modern generative AI applications often need to stream large language model (LLM) outputs to users in real-time. Instead of waiting for a complete response, streaming delivers partial results as they become available, which significantly improves the user experience for chat interfaces and long-running AI tasks. This post compares three serverless approaches to handle Amazon Bedrock LLM streaming on Amazon Web Services (AWS), which helps you choose the best fit for your application.

  1. AWS Lambda function URLs with response streaming
  2. Amazon API Gateway WebSocket APIs
  3. AWS AppSync GraphQL subscriptions

We cover how each option works, the implementation details, authentication with Amazon Cognito, and when to choose one over the others.

Lambda function URLs with response streaming

AWS Lambda function URLs provide a direct HTTP(S) endpoint to invoke your Lambda function. Response streaming allows your function to send incremental chunks of data back to the caller without buffering the entire response. This approach is ideal for forwarding the Amazon Bedrock streamed output, providing a faster user experience. Streaming is supported in Node.js 18+. In Node.js, you wrap your handler with awslambda.streamifyResponse(), which provides a stream to write data to, and which sends it immediately to the HTTP response.

Architecture

The following figure shows the architecture.

Lambda function URLs with Amazon Bedrock architecture

  1. The client makes a fetch() call to the Lambda function URL.
  2. Lambda invokes InvokeModelWithResponseStream using the AWS SDK for JavaScript.
  3. As tokens arrive from Amazon Bedrock, they are written to the response stream.

Implementation steps

  1. Create a streaming Lambda function: Use a Node.js 18+ or later runtime (necessary for native streaming). Install the AWS SDK to call Amazon Bedrock. In the handler code, wrap the function with awslambda.streamifyResponse and stream the model output. For example, in Node.js you might do the following:
    const bedrock = new BedrockRuntimeClient({region: “us-east-1”});
    
    // Please consider adding more details when you use it for your application.
    exports.handler = awslambda.streamifyResponse(async (event, responseStream) => 
    {
        // 1. Parse input (e.g., prompt from event)
        const prompt = event.body?.prompt;
        // 2. Call Amazon Bedrock with streaming (using AWS SDK for Amazon Bedrock)
        const command = new InvokeModelWithResponseStreamCommand({ modelId: "YOUR_MODEL_ID", body: { prompt }});
        const response = await bedrock.send(command);
        // 3. Stream Bedrock tokens to client
        for await (const event of response.body) {
            if (event.content) {
                responseStream.write(event.content); // write partial output
            }
        }
        // 4. End stream when done
        responseStream.end();
    });
    

  2. This code snippet uses the Amazon Bedrock SDK’s async iterable to read the event stream of tokens and writes each to the responseStream.
  3. Configure the Lambda role: the execution role must allow the Amazon Bedrock invocation (such as bedrock:InvokeModelWithResponseStream on the LLM model Amazon Resource Name (ARN)).

Authentication with Amazon Cognito

Lambda function URLs can be set to “None” (public) or “AWS_IAM”. Native Cognito User Pool token authentication isn’t supported, thus you need to implement a solution.

  1. JWT verification in Lambda: Allow public access and verify a valid JWT from Amazon Cognito in the request header within your Lambda code. This necessitates development effort.
    // Initialize Cognito JWT Verifier
    const { CognitoJwtVerifier } = require('aws-jwt-verify');
    
    const jwtVerifier = CognitoJwtVerifier.create({
      userPoolId: USER_POOL_ID,
      tokenUse: 'id',
      clientId: USER_POOL_CLIENT_ID
    });
    
    // Verify JWT token from Cognito
    async function verifyToken(token) {
      try {
        if (!token) throw new Error('No authorization token provided');
        
        // Remove 'Bearer ' prefix if present
        if (token.startsWith('Bearer ')) {
          token = token.slice(7);
        }
    
        // Verify the token using Cognito JWT Verifier
        const payload = await jwtVerifier.verify(token);
        logger.info(`Verified token for user: ${payload.sub}`);
        
        return payload;
      } catch (error) {
        logger.error(`Token verification failed: ${error.message}`);
        throw new Error(`Invalid token: ${error.message}`);
      }
    }
    
    //...
    
        // Verify authentication
        let userId;
        try {
          const authHeader = event.headers?.Authorization;
          const payload = await verifyToken(authHeader);
          userId = payload.sub;
          logger.info(`Authenticated user: ${userId}`);
        } catch (error) {
          responseStream.write(`data: ${JSON.stringify({ type: 'error', error: 'Unauthorized', message: error.message })}\n\n`);
          return;
        }
    

  2. IAM authorization with Amazon Cognito identity: Use AWS credentials obtained from Amazon Cognito. A more complex setup, especially for web apps, is potentially overkill for a single function.

Pros and cons of Lambda function URLs

Pros:

  • Clarity: No API Gateway or other services are needed, which minimizes operational overhead.
  • Low latency, high throughput: The response is delivered directly from Lambda to the client. This yields excellent Time To First Byte (TTFB) performance, with no intermediate buffering.
  • Direct implementation: For Node.js developers, enabling streaming is as direct as a wrapper and writing to a stream. This is ideal for quick prototypes or single function microservices.
  • Lower cost for low concurrent usage: You pay only for Lambda execution time. There’s no persistent connection cost, which is the same as with WebSocket or AWS AppSync. If invocations are infrequent or short, then this could be cost-efficient.

Cons:

  • Limited runtime support: Native streaming is only supported in Node.js.
  • No built-in user pool auth: Unlike API Gateway or AWS AppSync, Lambda URLs don’t directly support Amazon Cognito user pool authorizers. You must handle auth either through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) or manual token validation, adding some development effort and potential security pitfalls if done incorrectly.
  • Error handling complexity: Streaming makes error propagation trickier. If an error occurs mid-stream, then you need to decide how to inform the client.

API Gateway WebSocket for streaming

API Gateway WebSocket APIs establish persistent, stateful connections between clients and your backend. This is ideal for real-time applications needing server-initiated messages. The client connects once, sends a prompt to Amazon Bedrock through the WebSocket, and the server pushes the streamed response back over the same connection.

Architecture

The following figure shows the architecture.

API Gateway WebSocket with Amazon Bedrock architecture

  1. Client connects through the WebSocket URL and store connectionId.
  2. Client sends a prompt through a custom route to the LLMHandler.
  3. Lambda as LLMHandler invokes Amazon Bedrock and streams back through WebSocket.
  4. Client disconnects through the DisconnectHandler and removes connectionId.

Implementation steps

  1. Create a WebSocket API in API Gateway with routes
    1. $connect: Connected to ConnectHandler Lambda.
    2. $disconnect: Connected to DisconnectHandler Lambda.
    3. $stream: All messages go to StreamHandler Lambda.
  2. Create Lambda Authorizer
    1. Receives the connection request with token in query string.
    2. Validates the JWT token against Amazon Cognito.
    3. Returns Allow/Deny policy for the connection.
      def lambda_handler(event, context):
          # Extract token from querystring
          token = event.get("queryStringParameters", {}).get("token", "")
          
          # Validate JWT token against Cognito
          if validate_token(token):
              return {
                  "isAuthorized": True,
                  # Optionally include context that other handlers can access
                  "context": {
                      "userId": extracted_user_id
                  }
              }
          else:
              return {"isAuthorized": False}
      

  3. Create Connection Handler
    1. Connection Lambda runs after successful authorization.
    2. Receives the new connection’s unique connectionId.
    3. Store connection info in Amazon DynamoDB (optional).
    4. Returns 200 status to complete the connection.
      def lambda_handler(event, context):
          # Extract connectionId
          connection_id = event.get("requestContext", {}).get("connectionId")
          
          # Optionally store in DynamoDB
          # dynamodb.put_item(...)
          
          # Connection established successfully
          return {"statusCode": 200}
      

  4. Create Disconnect Handler
    1. Disconnect Lambda is triggered automatically when clients disconnect.
    2. Receives the terminated connection’s connectionId.
    3. Cleans up any stored connection data.
    4. Returns 200 status
      def lambda_handler(event, context):
          # Extract connectionId
          connection_id = event.get("requestContext", {}).get("connectionId")
          
          # Optionally remove from DynamoDB
          # dynamodb.delete_item(...)
          
          # Disconnection handled successfully
          return {"statusCode": 200}
      

  5. Create LLM Handler
      1. Receives messages sent to the stream route.
      2. Extracts prompt from the message body.
      3. Calls Amazon Bedrock model with streaming response.
      4. Streams tokens back to the client using the connection ID.
        def lambda_handler(event, context):
            # Extract connectionId and domain details for sending responses
            connection_id = event["requestContext"]["connectionId"]
            domain = event["requestContext"]["domainName"]
            stage = event["requestContext"]["stage"]
            
            # Parse message body to get the prompt
            body = json.loads(event.get("body", "{}"))
            prompt = body.get("prompt", "")
            
            # Create API Gateway management client for sending responses
            api_client = boto3.client(
                'apigatewaymanagementapi',
                endpoint_url=f'https://{domain}/{stage}'
            )
            
            # Call Amazon Bedrock with streaming response
            response = bedrock_client.invoke_model_with_response_stream(...)
            
            # Stream tokens back to client
            for chunk in response["body"]:
                # Extract token from chunk
                token = process_chunk(chunk)
                
                # Send token directly back through the WebSocket
                api_client.post_to_connection(
                    ConnectionId=connection_id,
                    Data=json.dumps({"token": token, "isComplete": False})
                )
            
            # Send completion message
            api_client.post_to_connection(
                ConnectionId=connection_id,
                Data=json.dumps({"token": "", "isComplete": True})
            )
            
            return {"statusCode": 200}
        

Authentication with Amazon Cognito

Securing a WebSocket API with Amazon Cognito needs a bit more work. API Gateway WebSocket doesn’t have a built-in Amazon Cognito User Pool authorizer:

  1. Lambda authorizer with JWT authentication: API Gateway invokes your Lambda authorizer upon connection, validating the Amazon Cognito JWT (passed as a query parameter). The Lambda generates an IAM policy granting access and returns it.
  2. IAM authentication for WebSockets: Clients sign requests with SigV4 using AWS credentials from an Amazon Cognito Identity Pool. API Gateway evaluates the request against IAM policies.

Pros and cons of API Gateway WebSocket APIs

Pros:

  • Bidirectional real-time communication: WebSockets are ideal for applications where the server needs to push data such as the LLM’s response without explicit requests.
  • Persistent connection for multi-turn conversations: After the initial handshake, the same connection can be reused for subsequent prompts and responses, avoiding repeated setup latency. This is great for a chat UI where the user asks multiple questions in one session.
  • Scalability: API Gateway is a managed service that can handle 500 connections/second and 10,000 requests/second across APIs, which can be increased by request.

Cons:

  • Higher development complexity: When compared to the clarity of a direct Lambda URL, a WebSocket API involves multiple Lambdas and coordination to manage the connection state.
  • Custom auth implementation: There is no built-in Amazon Cognito user pool integration, thus you must implement a Lambda authorizer.
  • Timeout management: The API Gateway integration timeout is 29 s, thus your Lambda function should return the response promptly.

AWS AppSync GraphQL subscription

AWS AppSync is a fully managed GraphQL service that streamlines building real-time APIs. It handles WebSocket connections and client fan-out automatically. Clients subscribe to a GraphQL subscription, and a Lambda resolver pushes the Amazon Bedrock streamed tokens back.

Architecture

The following figure shows the architecture.

AWS AppSync GraphQL subscription with Amazon Bedrock architecture

  1. Client calls a startStream mutation. AppSync invokes the Request Lambda.
  2. The Request Lambda immediately returns a unique sessionId and sends the processing task to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue.
  3. Client uses the sessionId to subscribe to an onTokenReceived GraphQL subscription.
  4. The Processing Lambda (triggered by Amazon SQS) invokes Amazon Bedrock and, for each token, calls a publishToken mutation in AWS AppSync.
  5. AWS AppSync automatically pushes the token to all clients subscribed with the matching sessionId.

Implementation steps

  1. Design the GraphQL Schema: define types and operations.
    type StreamResponse {
      sessionId: String!
      status: String!
      message: String
      timestamp: String!
      error: String
    }
    
    type TokenEvent {
      sessionId: String!
      token: String!
      isComplete: Boolean!
      timestamp: String!
    }
    
    type Mutation {
      startStream(prompt: String!): StreamResponse!
      publishToken(sessionId: String!, token: String!, isComplete: Boolean!): TokenEvent!
    }
    
    type Subscription {
      onTokenReceived(sessionId: String!): TokenEvent
    

  2. Create the Request Handler (Request Lambda)
    1. Receives the GraphQL mutation with the prompt.
    2. Generates a unique session ID.
    3. Sends the prompt and session ID to the SQS queue.
    4. Returns the session ID to the client immediately.
      def lambda_handler(event, context):
          # Extract prompt from GraphQL event
          prompt = event["arguments"]["prompt"]
          
          # Generate unique session ID
          session_id = str(uuid.uuid4())
          
          # Send message to SQS queue
          sqs_client.send_message(
              QueueUrl="your-sqs-queue-url",
              MessageBody=json.dumps({
                  "prompt": prompt,
                  "sessionId": session_id
              })
          )
          
          # Return session ID to client
          return {
              "sessionId": session_id,
              "status": "streaming_started",
              "timestamp": datetime.datetime.utcnow().isoformat()
          }
      

  3. Create the Processing Handler (Processing Lambda)
    1. It is triggered by Amazon SQS messages.
    2. It calls Amazon Bedrock with streaming enabled.
    3. For each token generated, it calls the AppSync publishToken mutation.
      def lambda_handler(event, context):
          # Process SQS event records
          for record in event["Records"]:
              body = json.loads(record["body"])
              prompt = body["prompt"]
              session_id = body["sessionId"]
              
              # Call Amazon Bedrock with streaming
              response = bedrock_client.invoke_model_with_response_stream(...)
              
              # Process streaming response
              for chunk in response["body"]:
                  # Extract token from chunk
                  token = process_chunk(chunk)
                  
                  # Publish token to AppSync
                  publish_token_to_appsync(
                      session_id=session_id,
                      token=token,
                      is_complete=False
                  )
              
              # Send completion token
              publish_token_to_appsync(
                  session_id=session_id,
                  token="",
                  is_complete=True
              )
      

  4. Configure GraphQL Resolvers
    1. StartStream resolver: Connect to the Request Lambda.
    2. PublishToken resolver: Trigger subscription with a NONE data source.
  5. Client subscription setup
    1. Make a startStream mutation.
      const { sessionId } = await client.mutate({
        mutation: START_STREAM,
        variables: { prompt }
      });
      

    2. Subscribe to receive tokens.
      client.subscribe({
        query: ON_TOKEN_RECEIVED,
        variables: { sessionId }
      }).subscribe({
        next: ({ data }) => {
          if (data.onTokenReceived.isComplete) {
            // Handle completion
          } else {
            // Append token to UI
            appendToken(data.onTokenReceived.token);
          }
        }
      });
      

Authentication with Amazon Cognito

AWS AppSync integrates seamlessly with Amazon Cognito User Pools. Setting the API’s auth mode to Amazon Cognito User Pool needs a valid JWT for every GraphQL operation. This is the most developer-friendly option for authentication. AWS AppSync handles the handshake and token refresh.

Pros and cons of AWS AppSync subscriptions

Pros:

  • Fully managed real-time protocol: You don’t deal with raw WebSockets or connection IDs at all. AWS AppSync automatically establishes and maintains a secure WebSocket for subscriptions (no need for a connect or disconnect Lambda).
  • Streamlined authentication: Built-in support for Amazon Cognito User Pool tokens means that you can secure the API without writing custom authorizers.

Cons:

  • Potential overhead and complexity: For a direct case (one prompt—one stream), introducing GraphQL and AWS AppSync might be seen as over-engineering if your app doesn’t use GraphQL for other use cases.
  • 30-second resolver limit: AWS AppSync has a 30-second limit for mutation resolvers, thus you need to design the initial request to start the process and immediately return, relying on a subscription to stream the results progressively to avoid blocking the user.

Conclusion

The Amazon Bedrock streaming interface unlocks fluid, low-latency LLM experiences. You can use the right AWS serverless architecture to deliver streamed responses in a secure, scalable, and cost-effective way.

  • Lambda function URLs with streaming: Direct, single-user applications and prototypes.
  • API Gateway WebSocket: Multi-turn conversations, collaborative applications.
  • AppSync: Complex applications already using GraphQL.

Each method is serverless, production-ready, and fully integrated with Amazon Cognito for secure access control. AWS provides the flexibility to design high-quality AI user experiences at scale.

Refer to GitHub sample source code for more details.

Comparative table

Feature LAMBDA FUNCTION URLS API GATEWAY WEBSOCKET APIs APPSYNC GRAPHQL SUBSCRIPTIONS
Complexity Lowest Medium High
Real-time focus Limited Strong Strong
Authentication Needs custom logic Needs custom logic Built-in Amazon Cognito support
Scalability Good Good Excellent
GraphQL support None None Native
Use cases Q&A Chatbots, real-time apps Complex apps, multi-user scenarios
Cost Pay per invocation Connection time and Lambda execution Request/connection-based pricing

 

Building multi-tenant SaaS applications with AWS Lambda’s new tenant isolation mode

Post Syndicated from Anton Aleksandrov original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-multi-tenant-saas-applications-with-aws-lambdas-new-tenant-isolation-mode/

Today, AWS announced a new tenant isolation mode for AWS Lambda, that allows you to process function invocations in separate execution environments for each application end-user or tenant invoking your Lambda function. This capability simplifies building secure multi-tenant SaaS applications by managing tenant-level compute environment isolation and request routing for you. As a result, you can focus on your core business logic rather than implementing your own tenant-aware compute environment isolation.

Overview

Lambda runs your function code in secure execution environments that leverage Firecracker virtualization to provide isolation. These execution environments never share or reuse virtual resources (such as vCPU, disk, or memory) across functions, or even across different versions of the same function. However, Lambda can reuse execution environments for multiple invocations of the same function version, as these execution environments are fully set-up and can therefore deliver faster request processing for your functions.

Figure 1. Incoming invocations processed by a collection of execution environments that belong to a single function.

Figure 1. Incoming invocations processed by a collection of execution environments that belong to a single function.

Multi-tenant SaaS applications that handle sensitive tenant-specific data or execute code supplied dynamically by tenants may need a higher degree of isolation—at the individual application tenant level rather than at the function level—for secure code execution and to reduce the risk of cross-tenant data access.

Prior to today’s launch, developers would implement custom solutions, such as SDKs or application logic to manage isolation within function code. This approach was bug-prone, required more work from application development teams, and didn’t ensure isolation at the compute environment level.

Alternatively, developers adopted the approach of creating separate functions per application tenant, replicating the same code across hundreds or thousands of tenants. This approach provided stronger compute environment isolation than sharing compute environments across multiple tenants of the same function, but increased implementation overhead and operational complexity as workloads grew to support a larger number of tenants over time.

Figure 2. Using function-per-tenant model, each tenant’s requests are processed by a separate function.

Figure 2. Using function-per-tenant model, each tenant’s requests are processed by a separate function.

Starting today, AWS Lambda offers a new tenant isolation mode that lets you isolate execution environments used across different tenants of your multi-tenant SaaS applications, even when all of the tenants invoke the same function. When you enable the new tenant isolation mode, you include a tenant identifier with each function invocation. Lambda uses this identifier to route the request to the correct execution environment. As a result, each execution environment is reused only for invocations from the same tenant. This means you still get the performance benefits of warm execution environments, while ensuring that each tenant’s workloads remain isolated.

Figure 3. With the new tenant isolation capability, Lambda creates separate execution environments per tenant for a single function.

Figure 3. With the new tenant isolation capability, Lambda creates separate execution environments per tenant for a single function.

For organizations handling sensitive tenant-specific data or running untrusted code supplied dynamically by end-users, Lambda’s new tenant isolation mode provides the security benefits of per-tenant compute environment separation without the operational complexity of managing individual functions or infrastructure for each tenant.

Example scenario

Consider building a multi-tenant serverless SaaS application. To optimize performance, your function handler can retrieve tenant-specific configuration and data, cache it in memory, and reuse it for subsequent invocations from the same tenant. For example, you might cache tenant-specific database location, feature flags, or business rules that are frequently accessed during request processing. You may store this information within the application runtime process as global variables or as files in the /tmp directory. However, if the underlying execution environment is used to serve multiple tenants, this approach can potentially expose data across tenants.

With tenant isolation mode you can address this risk with much simpler architecture and configuration. This built-in capability makes Lambda an excellent choice for multi-tenant SaaS applications needing isolated compute environments for individual tenants.

Getting Started with Lambda Tenant Isolation Mode

Use the new tenancy-config parameter to configure tenant isolation mode when you create your function. You can only apply this configuration at function creation time; it cannot be updated for existing functions. The following snippet creates a function with tenancy config using the AWS CLI.

aws lambda create-function \
   --function-name my-function1 \
   --runtime nodejs22.x \
   --zip-file fileb://my-function1.zip \
   --handler index.handler \
   --role arn:aws:iam:1234567890:role/my-function-role \
   --tenancy-config '{"TenantIsolationMode": "PER_TENANT"}'

After the function is created, you must provide the tenant ID parameter with each invocation. Lambda uses this identifier to ensure that the execution environment used for a particular tenant is never reused for other tenants. For subsequent invocations from the same tenant, Lambda may reuse the execution environment to optimize performance. Specify this tenant-id parameter as illustrated below:

aws lambda invoke \
   --function-name my-function \
   --tenant-id BlueTenant \
   response.json

The new tenant-id parameter is required for functions using the tenant isolation mode. Function invocations omitting this parameter will fail with an invocation error, as shown below:

aws lambda invoke --function-name multitenant-function out.json

An error occurred (InvalidParameterValueException) when calling the Invoke operation:
The invoked function is enabled with tenancy configuration. 
Add a valid tenant ID in your request and try again.

Lambda makes the tenant ID parameter available through your function handler’s context object. This allows you to access tenant-specific information in your code, for example if you wish to implement custom logic based on the tenant identity, as shown below:

exports.handler = async function (event, context) {
   const tenantId = context.tenantId;

   // Process tenant-specific logic

   return {
      statusCode: 200,
      body: `OK for tenantId=${tenantId}`
   };
};

The following table outlines differences between Lambda functions with and without tenant isolation mode enabled:

Feature Without the new
tenant isolation mode
With the new
tenant isolation mode
Execution environment isolation Isolated per function version. Isolated per end-user or tenant invoking a function version.
Execution environment reuse Can be reused to process all invocations of a function version. Can only be reused to process invocations from the same tenant invoking a function version.
Data stored on local disk and in-memory Potentially accessible across all invocations of a function version. Potentially accessible across invocations from the same tenant. Not accessible for invocations from other tenants.
Cold starts Occur when there are no warm execution environments available to process incoming invocation. Occur when there are no tenant-specific warm execution environments available to process incoming invocation. More cold starts expected due to tenant-specific execution environments.

Integrating with Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway uses Lambda’s Invoke API to invoke Lambda functions. When using the Invoke API, Lambda expects the tenant ID parameter to be passed using the X-Amz-Tenant-Id HTTP header. You can configure API Gateway to inject this HTTP header into the Lambda invocation request with a value obtained from client request properties such as HTTP header, query parameter, or path parameter. When using Lambda Authorizers, you can obtain the value from authorization context information returned by the authorizer, such as principal ID or JWT claim. See API Gateway documentation to learn how you can return authorization information from Lambda authorizers to be used for the X-Amz-Tenant-Id header value.

Figure 4. Obtaining X-Amz-Tenant-Id header value from authentication sources.

Figure 4. Obtaining X-Amz-Tenant-Id header value from authentication sources.

The following screenshot illustrates API Gateway Lambda integration configuration, where the incoming request to API Gateway includes an x-tenant-id header that is mapped to the X-Amz-Tenant-Id request header to invoke a Lambda function using tenant isolation mode.

Figure 5. Mapping client request header to Lambda tenant-id header.

Figure 5. Mapping client request header to Lambda tenant-id header.

The following code snippet illustrates this configuration implemented with the AWS CDK.

const lambdaIntegration = new ApiGw.LambdaIntegration(fn, {
   requestParameters: {
      // This configures API Gateway to inject X-Amz-Tenant-Id header
      // into downstream requests. The header value is obtained from 
      // x-tenant-id header in the client request.
      'integration.request.header.X-Amz-Tenant-Id': 'method.request.header.x-tenant-id'
   }
});

resource.addMethod('GET', lambdaIntegration, {
   requestParameters: {
      // This enables API Gateway to use the x-tenant-id header value 
      // obtained from the client request. The header name is arbitrary.
      // you can use any other header name. 
      'method.request.header.x-tenant-id': true
   }
});

Tenant-aware observability

For functions using tenant isolation, Lambda automatically includes the tenant ID in function logs when you have JSON logging enabled, making it easier to monitor and debug tenant-specific issues. Note that the tenantId property is available during function invocation, rather than during function initialization. The tenantId property is included for both platform events (like platform.start and platform.report) and custom logs you print in your function code, as shown in the following screenshot:

Figure 6. Lambda function logs with tenantId.

Figure 6. Lambda function logs with tenantId.

Lambda creates a separate CloudWatch log stream for each execution environment. You can use CloudWatch Log Insights to find log streams that belong to a particular tenant by filtering by tenant Id:

fields @logStream, @message
| filter tenantId=='BlueTenant' or record.tenantId=='BlueTenant'
| stats count() as logCount by @logStream
| sort @timestamp desc

You can also retrieve tenant-specific logs across all log streams:

fields @message
| filter tenantId=='BlueTenant' or record.tenantId=='BlueTenant'
| limit 1000

Each log stream starts with function initialization logs followed by the invocation logs. This structure helps you to debug tenant-specific issues and understand the lifecycle of each tenant’s execution environments.

Considerations

When using the new tenant isolation for Lambda functions, consider the following:

  • Each tenant’s execution environments are isolated from other tenants so that tenant-specific data stored on disk or in memory remain separated from other tenants invoking the same Lambda function.
  • All tenants share the function’s execution role. For more fine-grained permissions for individual tenants, consider propagating tenant-scoped credentials from the upstream application components invoking your Lambda function.
  • Your application may experience higher percentage of cold starts, as Lambda processes requests in separate execution environments for each tenant invoking your functions.
  • You pay a fee for each new tenant-specific execution environment created, depending on the memory configured for your function. See Lambda pricing page for details.

Best practices

When using the new tenant isolation mode for Lambda functions, AWS recommends the following best practices:

  • Implement robust tenant ID validation at the application layer to prevent unauthorized access through tenant ID manipulation. Consider using a dedicated service or database to maintain valid tenant IDs.
  • Monitor and audit tenant access patterns regularly to detect potential security anomalies or unauthorized cross-tenant access attempts.
  • Be aware of Lambda concurrency quotas when building multi-tenant applications. You might need to request quota increases based on your tenant count and usage patterns.

Sample code

Follow the instructions in this GitHub repository to provision a sample project in your own account and see the new Lambda tenant isolation mode in action. The sample project illustrates how to integrate a function using the new tenant isolation mode with Amazon API Gateway and propagate tenant identity from client requests.

Conclusion

The new tenant isolation mode for Lambda simplifies building serverless multi-tenant SaaS applications on AWS. By automatically managing application tenant-level compute environment isolation, this capability eliminates the need for custom isolation logic or separate tenant functions, allowing you to focus on the core business logic while AWS handles the complexities of tenant-aware compute environment isolation.

Combined with the existing security features in Lambda, rapid scaling, and pay-per-use pricing, tenant isolation mode makes Lambda an even more compelling choice for modern SaaS applications, whether you’re building new solutions or enhancing existing ones.

To learn more, refer to the documentation for tenant isolation. For details on pricing, refer to Lambda’s pricing page.

Improve API discoverability with the new Amazon API Gateway Portal

Post Syndicated from Giedrius Praspaliauskas original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/improve-api-discoverability-with-the-new-amazon-api-gateway-portal/

Amazon API Gateway now provides a fully managed portal feature, Amazon API Gateway Portal, that eliminates the need for static websites, open source solutions, or third-party offerings, which often led to fragmented API lifecycle management and increased costs. API Gateway Portal integrates with the API Gateway service and offers features like API products, interactive “Try it” functionality, and documentation for your API portfolio.

This fully managed solution addresses the need for a seamless way to showcase APIs and help developers quickly find, try, and integrate with them. By providing a managed solution that handles infrastructure, security, and scalability, API providers can focus on creating valuable APIs and delivering a great developer experience.

In this post, we will show how you can use the new portal feature to create customizable portals with enhanced security features in minutes, with APIs from multiple accounts, without managing any infrastructure.

Overview

A developer portal is a web page where API providers can share their APIs and API documentation by grouping them into portal products. Each portal product is a logical grouping of REST APIs and contains the documentation that you create and publish for your API consumers. Product pages within a portal contain the custom documentation at the portal product level. Product REST endpoint pages contain the documentation for each of the REST APIs with the details of the path and method of a REST API and the stage it’s deployed to. The combination of Product pages and Product REST endpoint pages provide the complete documentation for our API consumers on how to start using your REST APIs.

This abstraction allows you to organize endpoints from multiple APIs and stages into coherent product offerings for your consumers. For example, if you operate multiple APIs supporting a pet adoption service, you can create an “AdoptAnimals” portal product that groups dog-related endpoints from one API with cat-related endpoints from another API, while organizing user management functions into a separate “AdoptProcess” portal product.

With this flexibility you can present your APIs in a way that matches your business logic rather than your technical architecture and organize your APIs in ways that make the most sense for your consumers. For large enterprises managing extensive API portfolios, API Gateway Portal offers centralized catalogs of APIs across business groups, reducing duplicate work and improving standardization.

The portal feature automatically creates developer portals that display APIs with documentation, interactive testing capabilities, and integrated consumer analytics. The platform uses AWS Resource Access Manager (RAM) for multi-account API sharing, Amazon Cognito for access control, and Amazon CloudWatch for centralized monitoring.

Key features of API Gateway Portal

The API Gateway Portal provides comprehensive functionality for both API providers and consumers.

The following is a list of the key features that were introduced by the service at launch:

Customizable portal experience: You control your portal’s branding through custom logos and color schemes. You can configure custom domain names with SSL certificates managed by AWS Certificate Manager, or use the default domain structure provided by AWS.

Flexible access control: Access to developer portals can be controlled using Amazon Cognito, you can configure portals to be either publicly accessible or require authentication. Integration with Cognito user pools provides secure and scalable identity and access management that is enterprise-grade, cost-effective, and customizable. For organizations using existing identity systems, Cognito supports federation with SAML and OpenID Connect identity providers.

Cross-account API organization: The portal supports sharing portal products across AWS accounts using AWS RAM, so that organizations can create a unified API catalog while maintaining flexibility for API providers to develop and maintain APIs in their own accounts. When you share a portal product with another account, that account cannot modify any properties of your portal product or product endpoint pages, so API providers maintain control over their APIs while still enabling discovery across the organization. The cross-account sharing capabilities provide significant governance benefits for enterprise customers, including centralized discovery, standardization, reduced duplication, clear ownership, and controlled access.

Documentation: Beyond API reference documentation synchronized from your API definitions, you can add supplemental documentation including guides, use cases, and integration examples.

Search, discovery, and interactive API exploration: Consumers can search across your entire catalog. The portal provides intuitive customizable navigation and organization to help users find the right endpoints for their needs. Using the “Try It” functionality consumers can try APIs directly from the portal. Users can input request parameters, headers, and see live responses, reducing time-to-value for API integrations. This environment includes built-in limits for security and cost control.

Access control and governance

Amazon API Gateway Portal provides security and governance capabilities essential for production deployments.

Identity and access management: Integration with Cognito user pools provides secure and scalable identity and access management that is enterprise-grade, cost-effective, and customizable, including multi-factor authentication, password policies, and user lifecycle management.

API authorization: The portal respects existing authorization mechanisms configured on your APIs, including AWS IAM, Lambda authorizers, and Cognito user pools. Portal access doesn’t bypass your established security controls.

Cross-account governance: When sharing portal products across accounts using AWS RAM, the original API owners retain full control over their endpoints, including authorization strategies, integration configurations, and stage settings. Portal owners can use shared portal products but cannot modify the underlying API configurations.

Audit and monitoring: All portal management activities integrate with AWS CloudTrail for comprehensive audit logging. You can use Amazon CloudWatch RUM to perform real user monitoring to collect and view analytics about API consumers in near real time.

Resource limits: The service includes built-in quotas to prevent abuse, including limits on API testing rate limits, payload sizes, and integration timeouts. With these limits the “Try It” functionality cannot impact your production API performance.

Getting Started

Setting up a portal involves three main steps: creating portal products, configuring the portal, and publishing for consumer access. We will walk through those steps in more detail.

Create portal product

The following procedure shows you how to create a portal product:

  1. Navigate to the API Gateway console and select Portal products from the main navigation.
  2. Choose Create portal product and specify your portal product details including name, description, and visibility settings.
  3. Next, select the endpoints you want to include in this portal product. You can choose entire API stages or specific resources and methods, and even rename endpoints with user-friendly names for better discoverability.
  4. The system automatically imports your API documentation. You can improve the documentation with additional context, use cases, and examples later.
  5. Organize product endpoints into custom categories that reflect your business logic rather than technical implementation details.

Configure the developer portal

The following procedure shows how to create a portal.

  1. Select Developer portals in the API Gateway console navigation.
  2. Specify your portal name, description, and domain configuration.
  3. Choose between adding your prefix to the default AWS domain or configuring a custom domain name with your own SSL certificate.
  4. Configure access control by selecting authentication requirements. For internal portals, you might require Amazon Cognito authentication, while public portals can allow anonymous access to documentation.
  5. Upload your logo and select color themes to match your brand identity.
  6. Add your portal products. You can include products from your account or products shared with you from other accounts through AWS RAM. The portal provides search and filtering capabilities for consumers.

Preview and publish

Before making your portal publicly available, use the preview functionality to review the consumer experience. The preview shows exactly how your portal will appear to users, including navigation, documentation, and available API testing capabilities.

When you’re satisfied with the configuration, choose Publish portal to make it accessible to consumers. The publishing process typically completes within a few minutes, and API Gateway provides the final portal URL for distribution to your consumers.

Conclusion and next steps

The new API Gateway Portal eliminates the complexity of building and maintaining custom API documentation sites. Your developers get a professional, feature-rich experience where they can discover and try your APIs immediately. Plus, since everything stays within AWS, you get built-in security, simplified operations, and comprehensive observability through integration with services like CloudWatch and CloudTrail.

Ready to streamline your API discovery experience? Here’s how to get started:

Building an AI gateway to Amazon Bedrock with Amazon API Gateway

Post Syndicated from Thomas Natschläger original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/building-an-ai-gateway-to-amazon-bedrock-with-amazon-api-gateway/

When building generative AI applications, enterprises need to govern foundation model usage through authorization, quota management, tenant isolation, and cost control. To meet these needs, Dynatrace developed a robust AI gateway architecture that has evolved into a reusable reference pattern for organizations looking to control access to Amazon Bedrock services at scale.

This pattern uses Amazon API Gateway as the access layer in front of Amazon Bedrock. It supports key capabilities such as request authorization with seamless integration into existing identity systems (for example, JWT validation), usage quotas and request throttling, lifecycle management, canary releases, and AWS WAF integration. The gateway also uses Amazon API Gateway response streaming, launched today, for real-time delivery of API model outputs that stream to users as they are generated. The complete solution code is available in our GitHub repository.

In this blog post, you’ll explore the underlying architecture, learn how to deploy and configure the solution, and discover further enhancement ideas.

Architecture of the AI gateway

The reference architecture gives you granular control over LLM access using fully managed AWS services. It is transparent to client applications and seamlessly integrates into existing enterprise environments.


Figure 1. Reference architecture of the AI gateway.

The solution consists of four core components:

  1. Amazon Route 53 (optional) manages custom domain routing, allowing clients to access the gateway through a company-specific endpoint instead of the default Amazon API Gateway domain.
  2. Amazon API Gateway serves as the entry point for the requests and provides capabilities like authorization, request throttling, and lifecycle management.
  3. AWS Lambda authorizer handles request authorization, which in the Dynatrace implementation involves validating JWT tokens with existing authentication systems. For your specific implementation, you can implement your own authorization logic in a Lambda authorizer, integrate with Amazon Cognito user pools, or use other API Gateway authorization mechanisms.
  4. Lambda integration is a dynamic request forwarder that signs incoming requests with AWS credentials and routes them to the appropriate Amazon Bedrock endpoints. The function preserves the original request details, including the API action and parameters, to support current or future Amazon Bedrock APIs without code changes. The complete implementation is available in the integration Lambda function.
  5. Amazon Bedrock provides access to foundation models and AI capabilities.

The benefit of this architecture is the transparency to client applications and future-proof design. Clients can use AWS SDKs (like Boto3) to access Amazon Bedrock functionalities (such as LLMs and Knowledge Bases) exactly as they would when calling the Amazon Bedrock API directly. Meanwhile, the AI gateway handles authorization, quota management, and other capabilities behind the scenes.

When a client makes an Amazon Bedrock API call to the AI gateway endpoint, the Lambda integration function:

  1. Captures the original request with its details (headers, body, and parameters).
  2. Applies AWS Signature Version 4 authentication.
  3. Forwards the request to the correct Amazon Bedrock service endpoint.

With this approach the AI gateway can support current and new Amazon Bedrock features without requiring specific API knowledge or code updates, reducing gateway maintenance as the available features grow.

Deploying with AWS CloudFormation

This walkthrough will deploy a private AI gateway with authorization disabled for initial testing. You’ll create the core infrastructure (API Gateway, Lambda functions, and VPC endpoints) and then test basic functionality before optionally adding security features.

The quickest way to deploy this solution is with AWS CloudFormation:

  1. Sign in as an administrator to the AWS Management Console and use the navigation bar to select your desired AWS Region for deployment.
  2. Choose the following Launch Stack button:

launch stack button

  1. In the Quick create stack page, configure the key parameters as follows. For complete parameter descriptions, see the documentation.
Parameter Description Choose value Why
EndpointType API Gateway endpoint accessibility (PRIVATE or REGIONAL) PRIVATE Secure internal access only
EnableAuthorizer Enable Lambda Authorizer for API Gateway false Start without auth for simpler testing
CustomDomain Custom domain name for API Gateway (leave empty) Use default domain initially
HostedZoneId Route 53 Hosted Zone ID for custom domain SSL validation (leave empty) Not needed with default domain
  1. Select the capability I acknowledge that AWS CloudFormation might create IAM resources.
  2. Leave all other configurations at their default values and choose Create Stack.
  3. In the stack page, wait until the Status of the stack transitions to CREATE_COMPLETE.
  4. Choose Outputs and copy the values for GatewayUrl, VpcId, and ApiId – you’ll use these to test your gateway later.

Testing the deployment

Your gateway is now running privately inside its VPC, but that means you can’t reach it from the outside. You’ll now create an AWS CloudShell environment inside the VPC to test the gateway:

  1. Open the CloudShell console page, choose the + icon and then choose Create VPC environment.
  2. On the Create a VPC environment page, configure:
    1. Name: for example, AIGatewayTest
    2. Virtual Private Cloud (VPC): the VpcId you copied earlier
    3. Subnet: any available subnet
    4. Security group: the default VPC security group
  3. Choose Create to create your VPC environment.

Once your CloudShell environment is ready, you’ll create a client that properly routes requests through your private API endpoint.First, execute this command in CloudShell to create a reusable client factory that routes requests through your gateway while maintaining the standard boto3 interface:

cat > boto3_client_factory.py << 'EOF'
import boto3
from botocore import UNSIGNED
from botocore.client import BaseClient
from botocore.config import Config

class Boto3ClientFactory:
    """Utility class for creating boto3 clients."""
    
    @classmethod
    def create(cls, service_name: str, endpoint_url: str, jwt_token: str = None) -> BaseClient:
        """Create a boto3 client instance usable with the sign-and-forward Lambda.
        
        Parameters
        ----------
        service_name : str
            The service name to be used when initiating boto3.client.
        endpoint_url: str
            URL pointing to API gateway invoke endpoint.
        jwt_token: str, optional
            JWT token to include in Authorization header for all requests.
            If provided, adds 'Authorization: Bearer {jwt_token}' header.
        """
        generic_client = boto3.client(
            service_name = service_name,
            endpoint_url = endpoint_url,
            # do not sign the request at the client side; authentication is done
            # in API gateway
            config = Config(signature_version = UNSIGNED),
            # non-None Region_name needs to be passed due to validation logic
            # it is NOT used if we pass endpoint_url above
            region_name="",
        )
        
        def add_client_headers(model, params, **kwargs):
            """Hook to add custom headers each request."""
            headers = params["headers"]
            
            # the header "aws-endpoint-prefix" is used by the Lambda integration
            headers["aws-endpoint-prefix"] = model.service_model.endpoint_prefix
            
            # Add Authorization header if jwt_token is provided
            if jwt_token:
                headers["Authorization"] = f"Bearer {jwt_token}"
        
        # register the hook to add custom headers before each call
        generic_client.meta.events.register("before-call.*.*", add_client_headers)
        
        return generic_client
EOF

With the factory in place, you can now create clients for different Amazon Bedrock services. Set your configuration variables:

# Replace with your actual Gateway URL from CloudFormation Outputs (used in all examples)
export GATEWAY_URL="https://your-api-id.execute-api.region.amazonaws.com/v1"
# Replace with one of your pre-existing Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases ID (optional, only needed for knowledge base example)
export KB_ID="your-kb-id"

Test model inference with Amazon Bedrock ConverseStream API:

cat > test_converse_stream.py << 'EOF'
import os
from boto3_client_factory import Boto3ClientFactory
import json

# Get configuration from environment variables
api_gateway_url = os.environ['GATEWAY_URL']

# Create client for Bedrock Runtime (model inference)
bedrock_runtime_client = Boto3ClientFactory.create(
    service_name = "bedrock-runtime",
    endpoint_url = api_gateway_url
)

response = bedrock_runtime_client.converse_stream(
    modelId = 'global.anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0',
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": [{"text": "Who invented the airplane?"}]}]
)

print("Model Response:")
# Stream the response as it arrives
for event in response['stream']:
    if 'contentBlockDelta' in event:
        delta = event['contentBlockDelta']['delta']
        if 'text' in delta:
            print(delta['text'], end='', flush=True)  # Print each chunk immediately
    elif 'messageStop' in event:
        print("\n")  # End of stream
        break
EOF

python test_converse_stream.py

Test retrieval from Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases:

cat > test_knowledge_base.py << 'EOF'
import os
from boto3_client_factory import Boto3ClientFactory

# Get configuration from environment variables
api_gateway_url = os.environ['GATEWAY_URL']
knowledge_base_id = os.environ['KB_ID']

# Create client for Bedrock Agent Runtime (knowledge bases)
bedrock_kb_client = Boto3ClientFactory.create(
    service_name = "bedrock-agent-runtime",
    endpoint_url = api_gateway_url
)

response = bedrock_kb_client.retrieve(
    knowledgeBaseId = knowledge_base_id,
    retrievalQuery = {'text': 'Who invented the airplane?'},
    retrievalConfiguration = {
        'vectorSearchConfiguration': {
            'numberOfResults': 5
        }
    }
)

print("Knowledge base retrieval results:")
print(response)
EOF

python test_knowledge_base.py

Configuring authorization

After testing the basic functionality, you can now enable authorization by updating your deployed stack with custom authorization logic. For example, to implement JWT validation in a Lambda authorizer:

  1. Open the CloudFormation template file with your favorite text editor and replace the following placeholder code in the Lambda authorizer with your own authorization logic (see examples):
def lambda_handler(event, context):
    try:
        # Placeholder for JWT validation
        # Implement your authorization logic
        token = event['authorizationToken']
        
        # By default, deny all requests
        return generate_policy('user', 'Deny', event['methodArn'])
    except Exception as e:
        return generate_policy('user', 'Deny', event['methodArn'])
  1. Update the CloudFormation stack to enable your new authorization logic:
    1. Go back to the CloudFormation console
    2. Select your bedrock-llm-gateway stack, choose Update stack, and choose Make a direct update
    3. Choose Replace existing template, upload your modified template file, and choose Next
    4. In the parameters section, change EnableAuthorizer from false to true and choose Next
    5. Select the capability I acknowledge that AWS CloudFormation might create IAM resources.
    6. Choose Next and choose Submit
  2. Once the CloudFormation stack update is complete, deploy your changes to the API Gateway. API Gateway requires an explicit deployment step to activate configuration changes. While CloudFormation updates the API Gateway resources, the changes won’t be active until you create a new deployment to push them to the stage.
    1. Navigate to the API Gateway console
    2. Choose your API (find it using the ApiId from your CloudFormation outputs)
    3. Choose Deploy API
    4. For Stage select v1, and choose Deploy
  3. Test your authorization by going back to CloudShell and running this example. This example passes a JWT token to test the authorization – replace it with your actual token or other authorization parameters you configured in the Lambda authorizer.
cat > test_with_auth.py << 'EOF'
import os
from boto3_client_factory import Boto3ClientFactory

# Get configuration from environment variables
api_gateway_url = os.environ['GATEWAY_URL']

# Replace "your-jwt-token" with your actual JWT token
jwt_token = "your-jwt-token"

bedrock_runtime_client_with_jwt = Boto3ClientFactory.create(
    service_name = "bedrock-runtime",
    endpoint_url = api_gateway_url,
    jwt_token = jwt_token
)

response = bedrock_runtime_client_with_jwt.converse_stream(
    modelId = 'global.anthropic.claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-v1:0',
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": [{"text": "Who invented the airplane?"}]}]
)

print("Model Response:")
# Stream the response as it arrives
for event in response['stream']:
    if 'contentBlockDelta' in event:
        delta = event['contentBlockDelta']['delta']
        if 'text' in delta:
            print(delta['text'], end='', flush=True)  # Print each chunk immediately
    elif 'messageStop' in event:
        print("\n")  # End of stream
        break
EOF

python test_with_auth.py

Enhancement options for the AI gateway

The solution can be enhanced using additional API Gateway capabilities. Here are some examples:

  • Rate limiting and throttling: Control request rates using usage plans and API keys. This is especially important in multi-tenant SaaS applications to avoid noisy neighbor problems. For examples of throttling scenarios, see the throttling documentation.
  • Private or edge-optimized endpoints: Configure endpoint types to optimize for internal access or global performance.
  • Lifecycle management and canary releases: Manage multiple API versions and implement gradual rollouts with stage variables and canary deployments.
  • WAF integration: Add AWS WAF rules to help protect from common exploits.
  • Prompt and response caching: Implement caching strategies to reduce costs and improve response times for frequently requested prompts using API Gateway caching.
  • Content filtering: In addition to the safeguards offered by Amazon Bedrock Guardrails, add custom filtering in the Lambda integration layer to screen for sensitive content such as personally identifiable information (PII).

For more information about these capabilities, visit the API Gateway features page.

Conclusion

The AI gateway pattern demonstrated in this post provides a scalable way to manage access to foundation models and agent tools through Amazon Bedrock. Initially developed and implemented by Dynatrace to serve their global user base, this pattern has proven its effectiveness at enterprise-scale. By using the Amazon API Gateway enterprise features organizations can implement necessary controls while maintaining the benefits of serverless architecture.

To start using this solution today, follow the walkthrough in this blog post or check out our GitHub repository. To learn more about the services used in this solution, explore the Amazon API Gateway features page, or visit the documentation for Amazon API Gateway and Amazon Bedrock. To learn how this solution streams foundation model responses, see the documentation for the new Amazon API Gateway response streaming capability.


About the authors

Building responsive APIs with Amazon API Gateway response streaming

Post Syndicated from Anton Aleksandrov original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-responsive-apis-with-amazon-api-gateway-response-streaming/

Today, AWS announced support for response streaming in Amazon API Gateway to significantly improve the responsiveness of your REST APIs by progressively streaming response payloads back to the client. With this new capability, you can use streamed responses to enhance user experience when building LLM-driven applications (such as AI agents and chatbots), improve time-to-first-byte (TTFB) performance for web and mobile applications, stream large files, and perform long-running operations while reporting incremental progress using protocols such as server-sent events (SSE).

In this post you will learn about this new capability, the challenges it addresses, and how to use response streaming to improve the responsiveness of your applications.

Overview

Consider this scenario – you’re running an AI-powered agentic application that uses an Amazon Bedrock foundation model. Your users interact with the application through an API, asking complex questions that require detailed responses. Before response streaming, users would send their prompts and wait to eventually receive the application response, sometimes for tens of seconds. This awkward pause between questions and responses created a disconnected, unnatural experience.

With the new API Gateway response streaming capability, the interaction through the API becomes much more fluid and natural. As soon as your application starts processing the model response, you can stream it back to your users using the API Gateway.

The following animation illustrates this significant user experience improvement. The prompt on the left is processed using a non-streaming response with user having to wait for several seconds to receive the result. The prompt on the right is using the new API Gateway response streaming, significantly reducing TTFB and improving user experience.

Figure 1. Comparing user experience before (left) and after (right) enabling API Gateway response streaming when returning a response from a Bedrock foundational model.

Your users can now see AI responses appear in real-time, word by word, just like watching someone type. This immediate feedback makes your applications feel more responsive and engaging, keeping users connected throughout the interaction. In addition, you don’t have to worry about response size limits or implement complex workarounds – the streaming happens automatically and efficiently, letting you focus on building great user experiences rather than managing infrastructure constraints.

Understanding response steaming

In the traditional request-response model, responses must be fully computed before being sent to the client. This can negatively impact user experience – the client must wait for the complete response to be generated on the server-side and transmitted over-the-wire. This is especially pronounced in interactive, latency-sensitive cloud applications such as AI agents, chatbots, virtual assistants, or music generators.

Figure 2. Response is returned to the client only after it’s been fully generated, increasing time-to-first-byte latency.

Another important scenario is returning larger response payloads, such as images, large documents, or datasets. In some cases, these payloads may exceed the 10 MB response size limit or default integration timeout limit of 29 seconds of API Gateway. Before the launch of response streaming, developers worked around these limitations by using pre-signed Amazon S3 URLs to download large responses or accepting lower RPS for an increase in timeout. While functional, these workarounds introduced additional latency and architectural complexity.

With response streaming support you can address these challenges. You can now update your REST APIs to return streamed responses, significantly enhancing user experience, improving TTFB performance, supporting response payload sizes to exceed 10 MB, and serving requests that can take up to 15 minutes.

Figure 3. Response streaming reduces time-to-first-byte and improves user experience.

The response streaming capability is already delivering significant performance for organizations:

“Working closely with the AWS teams to enable response streaming was instrumental in advancing our roadmap to deliver the most performant storefront experiences for our largest customers at Salesforce Commerce Cloud. Our collaboration exceeded our Core Web Vital goals; we saw our Total Blocking Time metrics drop by over 98%, which will enable our customers to drive higher revenue and conversion rates.”, says Drew Lau, Senior Director of Product Management at Salesforce.

Response streaming is supported for any HTTP-proxy integration, AWS Lambda functions (using proxy integration mode), and private integrations. To get started, configure your API integration to stream the response from your backend, as described in the following sections, and redeploy your API for changes to take effect.

Getting started with response streaming

To enable response streaming for your REST APIs, update your integration configuration to set the response transfer mode to STREAM. This enables API Gateway to start streaming the response to the client as soon as response bytes become available. When using response streaming, you can configure request timeout up to 15 minutes. For best time to first byte user experience, AWS strongly recommends your backend integration also implements response streaming.

You can enable response streaming in several different ways, as illustrated in the following snippets:

Using the API Gateway console, when creating method integrations, select Stream for the Response transfer mode.

Figure 4. Enabling response streaming in API Gateway Console.

Setting response transfer mode using the Open API spec:

paths:
  /products:
    get:
      x-amazon-apigateway-integration:
        httpMethod: "GET"
        uri: "https://example.com"
        type: "http_proxy"
        timeoutInMillis: 300000
        responseTransferMode: "STREAM"

Setting response transfer mode using infrastructure-as-code (IaC) frameworks, such as AWS CloudFormation. Note the /response-streaming-invocations Uri fragment, it tells API Gateway to use the Lambda InvokeWithResponseStreaming endpoint:

MyProxyResourceMethod:
  Type: 'AWS::ApiGateway::Method'
  Properties:
    RestApiId: !Ref LambdaSimpleProxy
    ResourceId: !Ref ProxyResource
    HttpMethod: ANY
    Integration:
      Type: AWS_PROXY
      IntegrationHttpMethod: POST
      ResponseTransferMode: STREAM
      Uri: !Sub arn:aws:apigateway:${APIGW_REGION}:lambda:path/2021-11-
           15/functions/${FN_ARN}/response-streaming-invocations

Updating response transfer mode using the AWS CLI:

aws apigw update-integration \
   --rest-api-id a1b2c2 \
   --resource-id aaa111 \
   --http-method GET \
   --patch-operations "op='replace',path='/responseTransferMode',value=STREAM" \
   --region us-west-2

Using response streaming with Lambda functions

When using Lambda functions as a downstream integration endpoint, your Lambda functions must be streaming-enabled. The API Gateway uses the InvokeWithResponseStreaming API to invoke functions, as illustrated in the following diagram, and requires Lambda proxy integration. See the API Gateway documentation for additional guidance.

Figure 5. Using API Gateway response streaming with Lambda functions for interactive AI applications.

When you use response streaming with Lambda functions, API Gateway expects the handler response stream to contain the following components (in order):

  • JSON response metadata – Must be a valid JSON object and can only contain statusCode, headers, multiValueHeaders, and cookies fields (all optional). Metadata cannot be an empty string; at a minimum it must be an empty JSON object.
  • The 8-null-byte delimiter – Lambda adds this delimiter automatically when you use the built-in awslambda.HttpResponseStream.from() method, as illustrated below. When not using this method, you’re responsible for adding the delimiter yourself.
  • Response payload – Can be empty.

The following code snippet illustrates how you can return a streamed response from your Lambda functions so it will be compatible with API Gateway response streaming:

export const handler = awslambda.streamifyResponse(
   async (event, responseStream, context) => {

      const httpResponseMetadata = {
         statusCode: 200,
         headers: {
            'Content-Type': 'text/plain',
            'X-Custom-Header': 'some-value'
         }
      };

      responseStream = awslambda.HttpResponseStream.from(
         responseStream,
         httpResponseMetadata
      );

      responseStream.write('hello');
      await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 1000));
      responseStream.write(' world');
      await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 1000));
      responseStream.write('!!!');
      responseStream.end();
   }
);

Refer to the API Gateway documentation for further implementation guidelines.

Using response streaming with HTTP Proxy integrations

You can stream HTTP responses from your applications used as downstream integration endpoints, for example web servers running on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) or Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS). In this case, you must use HTTP_PROXY integration and specify the response transfer mode as STREAM (using the console, AWS CLI, or IaC). Redeploy your API after modifying it.

Figure 6. Using API Gateway response streaming with HTTP server applications.

Once API Gateway receives a streaming response from your application, it will wait until the HTTP headers block transfer is complete. Then, it will send to the client an HTTP response status code and headers, followed by the content from your application as it gets received by the API Gateway service. It will continue streaming response from your application to the client until the stream ends (up to 15 minutes).

Many popular API and web application development frameworks provide response streaming abstractions. The following code snippet illustrates how you can implement HTTP response streaming using FastAPI:

app = FastAPI()

async def stream_response():
   yield b"Hello "
   await asyncio.sleep(1)
   yield b"World "
   await asyncio.sleep(1)
   yield b"!"

@app.get("/")
async def main():
   return StreamingResponse(stream_response(), media_type="text/plain")

Adding real-time response streaming to your HTTP clients

Different HTTP clients have different ways to process streamed response fragments as they arrive. The following code snippet illustrates how to process a streamed response with a Node.js application:

const request = http.request(options, (response)=>{
   response.on('data', (chunk) => {
      console.log(chunk);
   });

   response.on('end', () => {
      console.log('Response complete’);
   });
});

request.end();

When using CURL, you can use the –no-buffer argument to print response fragments as they arrive.

curl --no-buffer {URL}

Sample code

Clone this sample project from GitHub to see API Gateway response streaming in action. Follow instructions in the README.md to provision the sample project in your AWS account.

Considerations

Before you enable response streaming, consider:

  • Response streaming is available for REST APIs and can be used with HTTP_PROXY integrations, Lambda integrations (in proxy mode), and private integrations.
  • You can use API Gateway response streaming with any endpoint type, such as Regional, Private, and Edge-optimized, with or without custom domain names.
  • When using response streaming, you can configure response timeouts up to 15 minutes, according to your scenario requirements.
  • All streaming responses from Regional or Private endpoints are subject to a 5-minute idle timeout. All streaming responses from edge-optimized endpoints are subject to a 30-second idle timeout.
  • Within each streaming response, the first 10MB of response payload is not subject to any bandwidth restrictions. Response payload data exceeding 10MB is restricted to 2MB/s.
  • Response streaming is compatible with API Gateway security capabilities such as authorizers, WAF, access controls, TLS/mTLS, request throttling, and access logging.
  • When processing streamed responses, the following features are not supported: response transformation with VTL, integration response caching, and content encoding.
  • Always protect your APIs against unauthorized access and other potential security threats by implementing proper authorization with Lambda Authorizers or Amazon Cognito User Pools. Read REST API protection documentation and API Gateway security documentation for additional details.

Observability

You can continue using existing observability capabilities, such as execution logs, access logs, AWS X-Ray integration, and Amazon CloudWatch metrics with API Gateway response streaming.

In addition to the existing access logs variables, the following new variables are available:

  • $content.integration.responseTransferMode – the response transfer mode of your integration. This can be either BUFFERED or STREAMED.
  • $context.integration.timeToAllHeaders – the time between when API Gateway establishes the integration connection to when it receives all integration response headers from the client.
  • $context.integration.timeToFirstContent – the time between when API Gateway establishes the integration connection to when it receives the first content bytes.

See API Gateway documentation for more information.

Pricing

With this new capability, you continue to pay the same API Invoke rates for streamed responses. Each 10MB of response data, rounded up to the nearest 10MB, is billed as a single request. See API Gateway pricing page for additional details.

Conclusion

The new response streaming capability for Amazon API Gateway enhances how you can build and deliver responsive APIs in the cloud. With immediate streaming of response data as it becomes available, you can significantly improve time-to-first-byte performance and overcome traditional payload size and timeout limitations. This is particularly valuable for AI-powered applications, file transfers, and interactive web experiences that demand real-time responsiveness.

To learn more about API Gateway response streaming see the service documentation.

To learn more about building Serverless architectures see Serverless Land.

BASF Digital Farming builds a STAC-based solution on Amazon EKS

Post Syndicated from Kevin S. Ridolfi original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/basf-digital-farming-builds-a-stac-based-solution-on-amazon-eks/

This post was co-written with Frederic Haase and Julian Blau with BASF Digital Farming GmbH.

At xarvio – BASF Digital Farming, our mission is to empower farmers around the world with cutting-edge digital agronomic decision-making tools. Central to this mission is our crop optimization platform, xarvio FIELD MANAGER, which delivers actionable insights through a range of geospatial assets, including satellite imagery, drone data, and application maps from sprayers.

In this post, we show you how we built a scalable geospatial data solution on AWS to efficiently catalog, manage, and visualize both raster and vector datasets through the web. We walk you through our solution based on the SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC) specification and the open source eoAPI ecosystem, detailing the solution architecture, key technologies, and lessons learned during deployment. This builds upon a previous post on efficient satellite imagery ingestion using AWS Serverless, extending our discussion to the full lifecycle of geospatial data management at scale.

Requirements for our geospatial data solution

BASF Digital Farming’s xarvio FIELD MANAGER platform operates at exceptional scale in the geospatial data ecosystem, processing hundreds of millions of satellite images that translate into STAC items, which further decompose into billions of individual geospatial artifacts. Unlike traditional satellite data providers such as European Space Agency (ESA) who work with predictable, structured data flows, we operate in an inherently dynamic agricultural environment where we ingest near-daily satellite imagery per field from a diverse array of sensors and providers globally. Our mission to support farmers worldwide with advanced digital agronomic decision advice demands a reliable, cloud-based infrastructure capable of handling this massive data velocity and volume and applying advanced quality assurance processes including cloud detection and anomaly detection algorithms. The platform’s true value emerges through our machine learning (ML) pipelines that transform raw satellite data into actionable insights. For example, estimating accurate absolute biomass such as Leaf Area Index (LAI) helps farmers make precise, data-driven agronomic decisions that optimize crop yield and resource utilization across fields worldwide.

STAC and eoAPI ecosystem

To efficiently manage our growing archive of geospatial data, we adopted the Spatio Temporal Asset Catalog (STAC) specification, an open standard that provides a common language to describe and catalog raster and vector datasets. With STAC, we can standardize metadata across diverse sources like satellite imagery, UAV datasets, and prescription maps, making it straightforward to search, filter, and retrieve assets across our platform. We built our platform using the eoAPI ecosystem, an integrated suite of open source tools designed to handle the full lifecycle of geospatial data on the cloud. At its core is pgSTAC, which provides a performant PostGIS-backed STAC API implementation. With pgSTAC, we can index millions of STACi Items efficiently, with support for spatial, temporal, and attribute-based filtering at scale. On top of that, we use Tiles in PostGIS (TiPG) to serve tiled vector data directly from our PostGIS database. This enables real-time visualization of field boundaries, management zones, and application histories as lightweight Mapbox Vector Tiles (MVT), without requiring an external tile server. For raster assets, including satellite and drone imagery, we rely on TiTiler, a modern dynamic tile server built for Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs (COGs). With TiTiler, we can stream imagery on-demand as WMTS or XYZ tiles, perform dynamic rendering (such as NDVI or false color composites), and integrate seamlessly into web maps and mobile apps.

Solution overview

The following architecture diagram shows how we implemented our geospatial data platform on AWS. In this section, we explain each component of the architecture and how they work together to process millions of satellite images and geospatial assets daily. The solution uses Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) as the core computing platform, with Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) for storage and Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) for metadata management. We break down the architecture into four main layers: core services, storage, database, and ingestion.

A detailed AWS Cloud architecture visualization showcasing a complete geospatial data processing system across four distinct layers. The database layer features an EKS Cluster managing STAC, raster, and vector services, all connected to Amazon RDS through a proxy instance. The client layer supports both desktop and mobile access via Amazon API Gateway. The ingestion layer processes geospatial data streams through a STAC ingestor, feeding into a robust storage layer utilizing Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF and FlatGeobuf technologies. The architecture emphasizes scalability and efficient spatial data handling through PostgreSQL with pgstac extension, enabling seamless integration of various geospatial services and data formats.

Core services layer

The solution uses an EKS cluster hosting three key services:

  • stac-service – Implements the STAC API specification to catalog and serve metadata for both raster and vector datasets
  • raster-service – Powered by TiTiler, this service dynamically renders and tiles cloud-optimized raster data (for example, COGs) for seamless integration into web and mobile maps
  • vector-service – Built with TiPG, this component serves vector data (for example, boundaries or application zones) as tiled MVT layers directly from the database or from Amazon S3

These services are containerized and orchestrated within Kubernetes, allowing for high availability, modular separation, and simplified continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) workflows.

KEDA-based automatic scaling

We use Kubernetes Event-Driven Autoscaling (KEDA) to scale our platform services dynamically based on real-time workloads. With KEDA, we can scale individual pods based on precise event-driven metrics such as the STAC ingestion queue depth or visualization request load. This supports responsive performance during peak activity while maintaining lean resource usage during idle periods, aligning perfectly with our need for elasticity in a data-intensive, variable-load environment.

Geospatial asset storage layer

The platform stores all raw and processed geospatial assets in S3 buckets, optimized for performance and durability. This layer holds COGs for raster imagery and FlatGeobuf or similar formats for vector data. These formats are chosen for their support of streaming access, indexing, and cloud-based performance.

Database layer

The metadata backbone of the system is a PostgreSQL database hosted on Amazon RDS, extended with the pgSTAC plugin. This setup enables efficient indexing and querying of millions of STAC items and collections. An RDS proxy sits in front of the database, providing connection pooling and resiliency, especially under bursty or concurrent access patterns common in geospatial applications.

Ingestion layer

An independent ingestion component handles batch or streaming geospatial data inputs. This component processes satellite imagery, drone data, or prescription maps and pushes relevant metadata into the STAC API and storage assets into Amazon S3. The ingestion engine is decoupled from serving infrastructure, enabling asynchronous and large-scale data loading.

Amazon API Gateway and clients

Public access to the platform is handled through Amazon API Gateway, allowing clients—whether browser-based or mobile—to interact securely with the services. The API gateway provides a unified entrypoint and is used for applying rate limiting, authorization, and routing policies.

Solution benefits

The solution offers the following benefits:

  • Rapid onboarding with STAC standardization – By aligning with the STAC specification, we’ve significantly reduced the time to onboard new data domains like sprayer application maps. Compared to previous approaches in our legacy system, metadata modeling and integration are now both standardized and automated, so we can expose new geospatial data products to clients in days instead of weeks or months.
  • Optimized storage with COGs and Amazon S3 – Storing raster and vector assets in Amazon S3 using cloud-optimized formats (such as COGs for imagery or FlatGeobuff for vectors) reduces storage costs while enabling low-latency, streaming access. This avoids the need for preprocessing or extract, transform, and load (ETL)-heavy pipelines and simplifies client delivery.
  • Large-scale ingestion with a batch STAC ingestor – Our custom STAC ingestor supports both real-time and batch-mode operations. This has made it possible to onboard satellite constellations, drone imagery, and historical datasets in bulk without disrupting running services. The ingestion service uses optimized database ingestion functions, capable of ingesting thousands of items per second, providing high-throughput and reliable data integration at scale.
  • PostgreSQL, pgSTAC, and Amazon RDS Proxy for a scalable metadata backbone – With pgSTAC and Amazon RDS Proxy, we benefit from advanced spatial-temporal querying while making sure database connection management is handled gracefully, even under high concurrency. This combination offers reliability without compromising performance.
  • Scalable deployment with Amazon EKS – Hosting the solution on Amazon EKS provides full control over deployments, resource tuning, and service orchestration. Combined with automatic scaling, we dynamically adjust compute capacity based on demand, facilitating resilience and cost-efficiency.

Learnings

As part of building this solution, we learned the following:

  • RDS Proxy is essential for automatically scaled environments – Given our use of automatic scaling pods in Amazon EKS, we found that RDS Proxy is critical. It handles connection pooling efficiently and protects the underlying PostgreSQL database from connection exhaustion during sudden scale-up events. Without it, we encountered spiky load failures and blocked connections during high-ingest periods.
  • Batch STAC ingestor is a core component – Our custom STAC ingestor proved to be an indispensable piece of the system. It interfaces directly with pgSTAC to perform large-scale, automated ingestions of geospatial metadata from streams and archives. Without this tool, onboarding data providers or processing legacy imagery at scale would have been labor-intensive and error-prone.
  • COGs are non-negotiable – For fast, scalable visualization of large raster datasets, COGs are essential, particularly if raster datasets exceed several gigabytes. They enable efficient HTTP range requests, alleviate the need for preprocessing, and work seamlessly with TiTiler for real-time tile rendering. Non-COG formats led to noticeably slower performance and weren’t suitable for cloud-based visualization.
  • Serverless-compliant, optimized for Amazon EKS (for now) – Although the architecture is designed to be serverless-compatible, we opted for an Amazon EKS first approach due to the nature of our other application landscape. Components like TiTiler and TiPG benefit from persistent, memory-tuned environments that are harder to achieve in a serverless runtime. However, the solution remains modular and stateless by design, and certain subsystems (such as ingestion triggers, notifications, or monitoring) are already candidates for future serverless migration to further improve elasticity and reduce operational overhead.

Conclusion

BASF Digital Farming GmbH has successfully implemented a STAC-based geospatial data platform on Amazon EKS, enabling efficient management and visualization of satellite imagery, drone data, and application maps. This architecture helps us onboard new data sources within weeks rather than months. The new platform also processes twice as much data in a single day while cutting costs by 50%, thanks to reduced data handling through the STAC schema and the efficiencies of automatic scaling. By adopting the STAC standard, the architecture improves data discoverability, reduces search latency, and supports more efficient analytic workflows.

Organizations looking to build similar geospatial data solutions can use AWS services like Amazon EKS, Amazon S3, and Amazon RDS along with open source tools like STAC and eoAPI to create scalable, cost-effective solutions. Learn more about building containerized applications on AWS at Containers on AWS.

Zero downtime blue/green deployments with Amazon API Gateway

Post Syndicated from Biswanath Mukherjee original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/zero-downtime-blue-green-deployments-with-amazon-api-gateway/

Modern applications require deployment strategies that minimize downtime and reduce risk. Blue/green deployment is a strategy that reduces downtime and risk by running two identical production environments called “blue” and “green”. At any given time, only one environment serves live production traffic while the other remains idle. This strategy provides immediate fallback to the previous stable version if issues arise after the new deployment. Let’s say a company is deploying a new version of its application. The following diagram shows the blue/green deployment strategy they are using.

Complete blue/green deployment strategy, including testing, monitoring, and conditional rollback procedures

As shown in the preceding diagram, current production traffic is served by the blue environment. During deployment of the new version of the application, the following sequence of activities happens:

  1. Deploy the new version of the application: Deploy the new version to the green environment.
  2. Test thoroughly: Test the new version in the green environment by invoking the API invoke URL from API Gateway. This does not affect production traffic, which continues to be served by the blue environment.
  3. Switch traffic: After you have thoroughly tested the green environment, redirect all production traffic from the blue to the green environment.
  4. Monitor and take any necessary action: Continue to monitor the green environment as it serves production traffic. Keep the blue environment ready for immediate rollback to the previous stable version, in case any issues arise in the green environment. At this point, one of two possible outcomes happens:
    1. If you identify any issues with the green environment in production, roll back to the previous stable version of the blue environment and fix the green environment before retrying.
    2. If you observe no issues with the green environment, decommission the blue environment. The green environment is now the new blue environment, the environment with stable production version of the application serving live traffic.

In this post, you learn how to implement blue/green deployments by using Amazon API Gateway for your APIs. For this post, we use AWS Lambda functions on the backend. However, you can follow the same strategy for other backend implementations of the APIs. All the required infrastructure is deployed by using AWS Serverless Application Model (AWS SAM).

Solution overview

As you follow along with this post, you will implement the following blue/green deployment architecture by using API Gateway custom domain API mapping. You use API mappings to connect API stages to a custom domain name. After you create a domain name and configure DNS records, you use API mappings to send traffic to your APIs through your custom domain name.

AWS serverless architecture showing blue /green deployment using Amazon API Gateway custom domain

As shown in the preceding diagram, the blue/green deployment architecture includes four primary AWS services – Amazon Route 53, Amazon API Gateway, AWS Lambda functions, and AWS Certificate Manager (ACM). When you send a request to the API, the Route 53 resolves the domain to the API Gateway custom domain. API Gateway handles HTTPS termination by using a configured ACM certificate. API Gateway examines the incoming request path and headers to route the request to the active environment.

You first set up the blue environment along with the Route 53 DNS configuration, API Gateway custom domain mapping, ACM and test it with Route 53 URL. This is your production environment serving live traffic. After that, deploy a new version of the application in the green environment and test it by invoking the API invoke URL from API Gateway while live traffic is still being served from the blue environment. Then, switch the traffic from the blue environment to the green environment by using API Gateway custom domain API mapping. This ensures that there is no change in the external (client-facing) API custom domain URL. Live traffic is now served by the green environment. If you observe any issues during this time, you can quickly roll back to the blue environment and fix the green environment. If the green environment is stable, you can decommission the blue environment.

This post uses two separate regional API endpoints to simulate blue/green environments and traffic routing between them but you can this same architectural pattern using single API endpoint with two stages representing blue and green environments.

Prerequisites

Complete the following prerequisites before you start setting up the solution:

Set up and test the solution

Note that this is a sample project to understand the concept and not for direct usage in production. The sample project contains three APIs.

  • Health GET API to know the current health of the environment and which environment the request was served from.
  • Pets GET API to get the list of available pets.
  • Order POST API to place a pet order.

Follow the steps below to setup blue/green deployment and test it.

  1. Clone the repository and navigate to the directory (all commands run from here)
    Clone the GitHub repository in a new folder and navigate to the stacks folder.

    git clone https://github.com/aws-samples/sample-blue-green-deployment-with-api-gateway.git
    cd sample-blue-green-deployment-with-api-gateway/stacks

  2. Deploy the blue environment
    You will first setup the blue environment. Run the following commands to deploy the blue environment:

    sam build -t blue-stack.yaml
    sam deploy -g -t blue-stack.yaml

    Enter the following details:

    • Stack name: The CloudFormation stack name (for example, blue-green-api-blue)
    • AWS Region: A supported AWS Region (for example, us-east-1)
    • BlueLambdaFunction has no authentication. Is this okay?: y
    • SAM configuration file: blue-samconfig.toml

    Keep everything else set to their default values. You will use the SAM deploy output for the subsequent steps. Going forward, you can run the following command to deploy the blue environment resources:

    sam build -t blue-stack.yaml
    sam deploy -t blue-stack.yaml --config-file blue-samconfig.toml

  3. Test the blue environment

    Run the following commands to test the blue environment after replacing ApiEndpoint with BlueApiEndpoint from the SAM deploy output in each case. First, test Health check API to know the health of the environment. Run the following command.

    curl --request GET \ 
    --url https://<ApiEndpoint>/health

    Sample response:

    {
      "status": "healthy", 
      "environment": "blue", 
      "version": "v1.0.0", 
      "timestamp": "2025-09-05T13:11:11.248267Z"
    }

    Second, test the pets GET API request to get the list of available pets. Run the following command.

    curl --request GET \ 
    --url https://<ApiEndpoint>/pets

    Sample response:

    {
      "environment": "blue",
      "version": "v1.0.0",
      "pets": [
        {
          "id": 1,
          "name": "Buddy",
          "category": "dog",
          "status": "available"
        },
        {
          "id": 2,
          "name": "Whiskers",
          "category": "cat",
          "status": "available"
        },
        {
          "id": 3,
          "name": "Charlie",
          "category": "bird",
          "status": "pending"
        }
      ]
    }

    Now, test create order POST API to place an order for a pet:

    curl --request POST \
      --url https://<ApiEndpoint>/orders \
      --header 'content-type: application/json' \
      --data '{
      "id": 1,
      "name": "Buddy"
    }'

    Expected response:

    {
      "confirmationNumber": "ORD-3251C0F4", 
      "environment": "blue",
      "version": "v1.0.0",
      "timestamp": "2025-09-05T13:16:04.703666Z", 
      "data": 
      {
        "id": 1, 
        "name": "Buddy", 
        "status": "ordered"
      }
    }
    

    Check that the response contains the environment attribute set to blue and the version attribute set to v1.0.0

  4. Deploy API Gateway custom domain pointing to the blue environment

    Run the following commands to deploy Amazon API Gateway custom domain with API mapping pointing to the blue environment created in the previous step.

    sam build -t custom-domain-stack.yaml
    sam deploy -g -t custom-domain-stack.yaml

    Enter the following details:

    • Stack name: (for example, blue-green-api-custom-domain)
    • AWS Region: A supported AWS Region (for example, us-east-1)
    • PublicHostedZoneId: The Route 53 public hosted zone ID (for example, ABXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYZ)
    • CustomDomainName: The Route 53 domain name (for example, api.example.com)
    • CertificateArn: The ACM certificate ARN (for example, arn:aws:acm:us-east-1:123456789012:certificate/abc123)
    • ActiveApiId: The value of the BlueApiId output from the blue-stack deployment
    • ActiveApiStage: The value of the BlueApiStage output from the blue-stack deployment
    • SAM configuration file: custom-domain-samconfig.toml

    Keep everything else to their default values. You will use the SAM deploy output for the subsequent steps. At this point the production (live) traffic is routed to blue environment.

  5. Test the production (live) traffic which is routed to blue environment

    Follow the test method mentioned in step 3 to test the production environment, but replace ApiEndpoint with CustomDomainUrl. Check that the production environment response contains the environment attribute set to blue and the version attribute set to v1.0.0

  6. Deploy the green environment

    You will now deploy the v2.0.0 of the application on green environment. Run the following commands to deploy the green environment:

    sam build -t green-stack.yaml
    sam deploy -g -t green-stack.yaml

    Enter the following details:

    • Stack name: (for example, blue-green-api-green)
    • AWS Region: Select the same Region as the blue environment (for example, us-east-1)
    • GreenLambdaFunction has no authentication. Is this okay?: y
    • SAM configuration file: green-samconfig.toml

    Keep everything else to default values. You will use the SAM deploy output for the subsequent steps. Going forward, you can run the following commands to deploy the green environment.

    sam build -t green-stack.yaml
    sam deploy -t green-stack.yaml --config-file green-samconfig.toml
    

  7. Test the green environment
    Follow the test method shown in step 3 to test the production environment, but replace ApiEndpoint with GreenApiEndpoint. Validate that the response contains the environment attribute set to green and the version attribute set to v2.0.0
  8. Switch the live traffic to the green environment
    Run the following command to switch live traffic to the green environment:

    sam deploy -g -t custom-domain-stack.yaml  --config-file custom-domain-samconfig.toml

    Enter the following details:

    • Stack name: Keep it as it is.
    • AWS Region: Keep it as it is.
    • PublicHostedZoneId: Keep it as it is.
    • CustomDomainName: Keep it as it is.
    • CertificateArn: Keep it as it is.
    • ActiveApiId: The value of GreenApiEndpoint output from the green-stack deployment
    • ActiveApiStage: The value of GreenApiStage output from the green-stack deployment
    • SAM configuration file: Keep it as it is.

    Keep everything else at their default values.

  9. Test the production environment (now green) again

    Follow the test method shown in step 3 to test the production environment (now green) again, and be sure to replace ApiEndpoint with CustomDomainUrl from SAM deploy output. Validate that the response now contains the environment attribute set to green and the version attribute set to v2.0.0. Note that it may take a minute or two for the change to be seen due to local DNS caching, during this time some of the traffic may be still served from the blue environment. After switching the live traffic to the green environment, if there is an issue, you can switch the live traffic back to the blue environment and fix the green environment. Depending on whether you need to roll back to the previous stable blue environment or decommission the blue environment when you no longer need it, follow either step 10 or 11.

  10. (Option 1) Roll back to the blue environment, if necessary
    Run the following command to roll back to the blue environment, if necessary.

    sam deploy -g -t custom-domain-stack.yaml  --config-file custom-domain-samconfig.toml

    Enter the following details:

    • Stack name: Keep it as it is.
    • AWS Region: Keep it as it is.
    • PublicHostedZoneId: Keep it as it is.
    • CustomDomainName: Keep it as it is.
    • CertificateArn: Keep it as it is.
    • ActiveApiId: Value of BlueApiEndpoint output from the blue-stack deployment.
    • ActiveApiStage: The value of BlueApiStage output from the blue-stack deployment.
    • SAM configuration file: Keep it as it is.

    Keep everything else to their default values. Live traffic is switched to the blue environment. You can confirm that by following step 3.

  11. (Option 2) Decommission the blue environment when you no longer need it
    Run the following command to decommission (delete) the blue environment when you no longer need it. Replace blue-stack-name with your blue deployment stack name:

    sam delete --stack-name <blue-stack-name> --no-prompts

Clean up

To avoid costs, remove all resources created along this post once you’re done.

Run the following command after replacing the <placeholder> variables to delete the resources you deployed for this post’s solution:

# Delete all stacks (in reverse order)
# Delete custom domain
sam delete --stack-name <api-custom-domain-stack-name> --no-prompts
# Delete green stack
sam delete --stack-name <green-stack-name> --no-prompts
# Delete blue stack, if already not deleted in step 10
sam delete --stack-name <blue-stack-name> --no-prompts

Conclusion

Blue/green deployments with API Gateway provide a robust, scalable solution for zero-downtime deployments that deliver significant technical and operational advantages. This post’s solution architecture enables traffic switching at the API Gateway level while maintaining complete isolation between the blue and green environments to prevent interference. The solution offers immediate rollback capabilities for quick issue resolution and supports comprehensive testing through production-like validation before any traffic switching occurs.

Following this solution you can build a solid foundation for production blue/green deployments for your serverless microservice architecture that maintains the flexibility to adapt to your specific requirements while ensuring reliability, scalability, and operational excellence. To learn more about serverless architectures see Serverless Land.

Modernization of real-time payment orchestration on AWS

Post Syndicated from Neeraj Kaushik original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/modernization-of-real-time-payment-orchestration-on-aws/

The global real-time payments market is experiencing significant growth. According to Fortune Business Insights, the market was valued at USD 24.91 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 284.49 billion by 2032, with a CAGR of 35.4%. Similarly, Grand View Research reports that the global mobile payment market, valued at USD 88.50 billion in 2024, is expected to grow at a CAGR of 38.0% from 2025 to 2030. (Disclaimer: Third-party market research and statistics are provided for informational purposed only. AWS and IBM make no representations about the accuracy of this information.)

This rapid expansion underscores the urgency for financial institutions to modernize their payment processing infrastructure. Financial institutions often need to process high volume of transactions with near-zero latency to meet stringent service level agreements (SLAs) to support surging mobile payments volume.

However, traditional payment orchestration systems, often built on monolithic architectures, struggle to meet these demands due to latency, availability, and scalability challenges. Additionally, their reliance on on-premises infrastructure leads to higher costs and an impediment to innovation, reinforcing the need for modernization.

As sustainability becomes a priority, organizations are turning to cloud-based solutions to optimize infrastructure, reduce carbon footprints, and enhance energy efficiency. This shift provides scalability and performance, and aligns with global sustainability goals, securing the future of real-time payments.

In this post, we discuss the real-time payment orchestration framework. It uses an event-driven architecture and AWS serverless services to enhance the resiliency, efficiency, and scalability of real-time payments. By decomposing payment processing into distinct business capabilities, financial institutions can improve modularity and flexibility. Implementing tenant-based segregation helps with data isolation and security. Additionally, adopting asynchronous communication through Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) enhances scalability and resilience.

Traditional real-time payment orchestration

Payment orchestration serves as a middleware solution, streamlining transaction processing across multiple payment methods, gateways, and financial institutions. It orchestrates key business functions such as payment authorization, payment processing, settlement and clearing, compliance and risk management, and account management for both inbound and outbound payment flows.

The following diagram depicts the high-level business capabilities supported by payment orchestrators across various payment flows, including real-time payments, digital disbursements, tax payments, wires, and more.

Payment processing system flowchart showing main components from acceptance to billing

Detailed flowchart depicting a payment processing system with multiple components. The diagram shows primary payment types at the top (including Realtime Payments, Digital Disbursement, Credit Transfer, and Peer to Peer Payments) flowing down through core processing stages including Payment Acceptance, Execution, Clearing, Reporting, Tracking, Reversals, and Billing.

Many financial institutions adopt a tenant-based approach organized by geography due to varying clearing processes, localized regulations, and transaction requirements across AWS Regions. However, without proper separation of services, teams often continue to add region-specific logic to existing services, gradually increasing their monolithic complexity and using the same infrastructure for all payment flows.

Traditional payment systems process transactions linearly, with each step waiting for the previous one to complete. However, analysis of payment workflows reveals numerous opportunities for parallel execution:

  • Sanctions screening and fraud detection – Compliance and fraud checks can run simultaneously with initial routing decisions, rather than sequentially blocking all subsequent processing
  • Payment routing and authorization requests – When basic validations are complete, routing and authorization can proceed in parallel rather than one after another
  • Payment execution and ledger updates – The actual payment execution doesn’t need to wait for ledger records to be updated—these can occur concurrently
  • Settlement, reconciliation, and tracking – These post-transaction processes can be initiated independently as soon as the primary transaction is complete

This parallel approach can dramatically improve throughput and reduce latency compared to traditional queue-based systems where operations form a sequential chain that extends processing time and creates bottlenecks.

Most legacy payment orchestration systems rely heavily on on-premises virtual machines (VMs), leading to several challenges:

  • Multi-Region support for disaster recovery and multi-tenancy resulting in significant capital expenditure and operational overhead
  • High latency and SLA issues caused by sequential message processing and delays between globally separated data centers
  • Limited reusability of payment flows as monolithic architectures require region-specific changes for local clearing mechanisms and regulations, increasing complexity and costs
  • Scalability challenges and high memory consumption due to inefficient resource utilization and execution of irrelevant logic across regions
  • Complex cross-border payment routing caused by variations in clearing rules, transaction limits, and local regulations, increasing latency and routing errors
  • Integration challenges with diverse data formats because legacy systems rely on proprietary standards (for example, ISO 20022, SWIFT MT), complicating data conversion and compliance
  • High deployment complexity for new payment flows due to monolithic architectures requiring extensive region-specific modifications, slowing time to market
  • Environmental impact and high carbon footprint from on-premises infrastructure consuming excessive energy, whereas cloud-based approaches improve efficiency

Solution overview

To overcome these challenges, the proposed architecture embraces the following design principles to build a future-ready, real-time payment orchestration solution:

  • Performance at scale – Handling over 1,000 transactions per second (TPS) with consistent low latency under varying load conditions.
  • High availability – Achieving 99.999% uptime to meet the strict requirements of financial transactions.
  • Geographic resilience – Supporting global operations with region-specific compliance while maintaining consistent performance.
  • Cost optimization – Reducing total cost of ownership through efficient resource utilization and serverless technologies.
  • Security and compliance – Supporting data protection and regulatory adherence across different jurisdictions.
  • Operational simplicity – Streamlining deployment, monitoring, and maintenance across the payment ecosystem.
  • Microservices – Decomposing payment processing into distinct business capabilities, so financial institutions can improve modularity and flexibility. This microservices-based approach allows for independent scaling and development of critical components.

The following diagram depicts the high-level solution architecture for real-time payments. The existing channels using synchronous or asynchronous APIs can be modified to use edge-optimized endpoints to reduce latency.

Event-driven payment orchestration system with pub/sub channels connecting multiple payment processing modules

Architecture diagram detailing an AWS-based payment orchestration platform utilizing event-driven principles. Features reusable components across two regions, with dedicated modules for payment initiation, execution, reconciliation, billing, and risk management. Implements pub/sub messaging patterns for inter-component communication and connects to enterprise systems including accounting, compliance, and analytics.

An event-driven architecture is used for payment orchestration, which handles communication through a pub/sub pattern. This architecture maintains persistent connections, improving performance of the end-to-end real-time payment processing.

The event-driven architecture for real-time payment processing allows multiple payment operations to occur simultaneously using different adaptors, as opposed to the traditional systems where payment processes are sequential and flow through a single pipeline. Payment events are distributed to specialized payment processor microservices based on their function (initiation, execution, tracking, settlements), enabling each to process independently without waiting for others to complete.

Because we’re transitioning from sequential processing to distributed, maintaining transaction traceability is crucial. The payment tracking adapters shown in the preceding diagram connect to enterprise analytics systems, creating a specialized layer for monitoring transactions. The pub/sub model allows for attaching correlation IDs to events, enabling systems to track related events across different topics and processing stages.

A standardized event schema serves as the foundation for this architecture, providing consistency across regional deployments while allowing for customization at the adapter level. This schema defines uniform event structures containing tenant-specific metadata and supports versioning to accommodate evolving requirements. By isolating region-specific variations to the adapter layer, the solution maintains core functionality while interfacing with diverse enterprise systems through configuration-driven customization rather than code changes.

For most payment processes, especially those with independent processing steps that can run in parallel, this architecture delivers net performance gains despite the topic switching overhead, particularly for complex transactions where multiple independent validations or processing steps are required.

Deployment on the AWS Cloud

The solution uses edge-optimized Amazon API Gateway for channels. An edge-optimized API endpoint routes requests to the nearest Amazon CloudFront Point of Presence (POP), which can help in cases where your clients are geographically distributed to enable efficient routing within each geographical region, enhancing global responsiveness by minimizing network round trips and making sure requests take the shortest possible path before transitioning from the public internet to the client network.

The following diagram illustrates the high-level solution architecture for real-time payments.

Multi-region AWS payment architecture with managed Kafka topics connecting Lambda microservices and DynamoDB storage

Comprehensive AWS payment orchestration solution implementing modern cloud-native architecture principles. Core processing logic implemented as Lambda functions covering initiation, execution, reconciliation, billing, tracking, risk management, and settlement workflows. Leverages Amazon MSK for reliable event streaming between components, with dedicated Kafka topics for each processing stage. Data persistence handled by Amazon DynamoDB, supporting cross-region operations. Architecture demonstrates AWS best practices for financial services, including regional redundancy, serverless computing, managed services, and event-driven design patterns. System integrates with external banking infrastructure and enterprise systems while maintaining separation of concerns through microservices architecture. Features built-in support for compliance monitoring, risk management, and payment tracking through specialized Lambda functions.

The solution uses Amazon MSK to implement an event-driven architecture that efficiently handles both inbound and outbound channels traffic through API requests and asynchronous message-based events. Amazon MSK communicates using a high-performance binary protocol between producers, consumers, and brokers, providing low latency and high throughput. Real-time payments are logically partitioned across multiple tenants within geographical regions—North America, EMEA, LATAM, and Asia-Pacific.

Each real-time payment tenant follows an active/active disaster recovery strategy by deploying MSK clusters across multiple AWS Regions, designed to achieve high availability and resilience. Amazon MSK offer both serverless and provisioned cluster options. The team can decide to select one or the other depending on the non-functional requirements and team expertise. Amazon MSK automatically manages partition leadership with leaders in primary Regions and followers in secondary Regions. During failover, leaders are re-elected in healthy Regions, designed to help maintain processing capabilities during regional incidents. Sticky partitioning uses consistent hashing for deterministic routing, and cooperative rebalancing enables efficient failover. Multi-AZ deployment provides zone redundancy and isolated clusters per Region for data sovereignty compliance through programmatic AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) and virtual private cloud (VPC) boundaries.

To support seamless cross-Region replication and maintain message continuity, Amazon MSK Replicator—a fully managed feature of Amazon MSK—is used to replicate topics and synchronize consumer group offsets across clusters. MSK Replicator simplifies the process of building multi-Region Kafka applications by not needing custom code, open-source tool configuration, or infrastructure management. It automatically provisions and scales the necessary resources, so teams can focus on business logic while only paying for the data being replicated. In the event of a regional outage or failover, traffic can be automatically redirected to a healthy Region without data loss or service disruption, providing near-zero Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and uninterrupted operations for downstream services such as payment processors and audit trail consumers.

In addition to regional redundancy, the architecture uses an event-driven architecture to enable parallel and decoupled processing of payment transactions. Events such as transaction initiation, validation, and settlement are emitted asynchronously and consumed by various microservices independently, which drastically reduces end-to-end latency.

To process these events at scale, the architecture can use AWS Lambda, Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS), or Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) depending upon non-functional requirements. Automatic scaling responds to Amazon CloudWatch metrics, and exponential backoff retry logic with dead-letter queues (DLQs) handles throttling scenarios. Circuit breakers prevent cascade failures during high error rates.

One of the key benefits of the solution is the reusability of payment flows across different regions. Although each region has its own unique compliance requirements and settlement rules, the core functionalities of real-time payments (payment authorization, payment processing, settlement and clearing) are largely similar. This reusability enables rapid deployment of payment solutions across new regions without rearchitecting the entire system. For example, the real-time payment system in the US and UK might share similar business logic for real-time gross settlement but differ in the clearing and compliance requirements. The solution treats these as bounded contexts within the microservices architecture, providing flexibility while making sure each region can handle its own specific rules and regulations.

Sustainability

AWS relentlessly innovates its infrastructure design, build, and operations to make progress towards net-zero carbon by 2040 and being water positive by 2030. Amazon MSK with AWS Graviton based instances use up to 60% less energy than comparable M5 instances, helping you achieve your sustainability goals. Lambda is inherently sustainable by design. Its serverless model makes sure compute resources are only used when needed, drastically reducing idle infrastructure and wasted energy. Instead of keeping always-on servers for infrequent tasks, Lambda provisions compute power just-in-time, achieving near-zero idle capacity.

Security and compliance in financial services

Given the sensitive nature of payment transactions and financial data, you should apply the security controls required to meet financial regulations such as AWS PCI DSS and AWS Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 140-3 according to your organization’s needs.

The solution should incorporate multi-layered security controls, continuous monitoring, and automated compliance auditing to meet the rigorous expectations of banking regulators and internal risk teams. For more information, refer to Security Guidance.

Conclusion

The modernization of payment orchestration systems using an event-driven architecture and AWS serverless technologies marks a significant advancement in meeting the demands of today’s rapidly evolving financial services landscape. This solution addresses the key challenges faced by traditional payment systems while delivering substantial benefits in performance, scalability, cost optimization, global resilience, sustainability, and compliance. By using cutting-edge cloud technologies and robust security controls, financial institutions can now build a future-ready foundation that adapts to evolving business needs while maintaining the highest standards of performance, security, and reliability. As the real-time payments market continues its explosive growth, this modern architecture provides a solution that meets today’s demands and is also well-positioned to support tomorrow’s payment innovations. Organizations looking to modernize their payment infrastructure can use this blueprint to accelerate their digital transformation journey, supporting sustainable, secure, and efficient payment processing at scale in an increasingly competitive global marketplace.

The architecture presented here is for reference purposes only. IBM will work closely with you to deploy the solution in accordance with industry standards and compliance requirements.For additional resources, refer to:

IBM Consulting is an AWS Premier Tier Services Partner that helps customers who use AWS to harness the power of innovation and drive their business transformation. They are recognized as a Global Systems Integrator (GSI) for over 22 competencies, including Financial Services Consulting. For additional information, please contact an IBM Representative.

Accessing private Amazon API Gateway endpoints through custom Amazon CloudFront distribution using VPC Origins

Post Syndicated from Napoleone Capasso original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/accessing-private-amazon-api-gateway-endpoints-through-custom-amazon-cloudfront-distribution-using-vpc-origins/

Organizations can use Amazon CloudFront Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Origins to deliver content from applications hosted in private subnets within Amazon VPC. Network traffic flows between Amazon CloudFront and Application Load Balancers (ALBs), Network Load Balancers (NLBs), or Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instances deployed within private subnets. This means that Amazon CloudFront can access both public and private Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources seamlessly.

This post demonstrates how you can connect CloudFront with a Private REST API in Amazon REST API Gateway using a VPC origin.

Overview

Organizations looking to enhance their application security and performance can find several key benefits in this architecture. You can use it to keep your APIs private and access them through CloudFront, implementing more security layers such as AWS Shield Advanced, geoblocking and TLSv1.3 support along with custom cipher suites. You can use this approach to engage the global CloudFront content delivery network while maintaining more control over the distribution.

Furthermore, you can enhance security controls through the built-in features of CloudFront, such as AWS WAF integration, custom SSL certificates, and field-level encryption. The VPC Origins feature eliminates any need to expose your internal resources to the public internet, which reduces your application’s potential attack surface.

Enterprises that need to maintain strict compliance requirements while delivering content globally can find this solution particularly valuable. Contain all traffic within the AWS private network to better meet your security and compliance objectives while still providing fast, reliable access to your applications.

Solution overview

You can set up CloudFront as the front door to your application and use VPC Origins integrated with an internal ALB to route traffic to Private Rest API through an execute-api VPC endpoint. All traffic between CloudFront and Private REST API remains within the AWS Private network.

The following figure provides an overview of the solution.

Figure 1: Amazon CloudFront to Private Amazon API Gateway

This diagram depicts three services running in an AWS account. The CloudFront distribution serves as the main entry point for the application. This distribution connects to an internal ALB using VPC Origins. The interface VPC endpoint execute-api is set as the target for the internal ALB to route requests to the Private Amazon API Gateway.

Solution deployment

To deploy this solution, follow the instructions in the GitHub repository and clone the repository.

The solution can be deployed in any AWS Region. Make sure to have a valid SSL certificate in AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) in the us-east-1 Region for the CloudFront distribution. All other resources must be in the same Region.

Prerequisites

For this walkthrough, the following resources are needed:

  • An Amazon VPC with at least 2 Private Subnets.
  • A Public Hosted Zone in Amazon Route 53.
  • A valid public SSL certificate in ACM in the us-east-1 Region for CloudFront and another certificate in the same Region as an ALB.
  • A custom domain name, covered by the ACM certificate for CloudFront distribution.

These are the input parameters for the solution deployment.

Walkthrough

The AWS Serverless Application Model (AWS SAM) template from the sample GitHub repository creates a secure, private networking architecture that provides controlled access to an API Gateway through CloudFront. It provisions a private API Gateway with a VPC endpoint, an internal ALB, and a CloudFront distribution. The template establishes secure communication channels by implementing private networking components, configuring SSL certificates, and setting up Route53 DNS routing. It uses custom AWS Lambda resources to dynamically manage network interfaces and security group configurations, providing a robust and flexible infrastructure for private API access, as shown in the following figure.

Figure 2: Amazon CloudFront to Private Amazon API Gateway walkthrough

Step 1: Create the CloudFront distribution and the VPC Origins

The solution creates a CloudFront distribution that enables wide range of HTTP clients by supporting HTTP2 and HTTP3, enhances your solution security by enforcing HTTPS-only traffic, and uses a custom domain with the user-provided SSL certificate.The internal ALB is configured as the origin for the CloudFront distribution, and it is created using the VPC Origins feature.

########### Cloudfront Distribution ###############
  CloudFrontDistribution:
    Type: AWS::CloudFront::Distribution
    Properties:
      DistributionConfig:
        HttpVersion: http2and3
        Comment: CloudFront Distribution with VPC Origin Integration
        Aliases: 
        - !Ref CloudFrontDomainName
        ViewerCertificate:
          AcmCertificateArn: !Ref CloudFrontCertificateARN
          MinimumProtocolVersion: TLSv1.2_2021
          SslSupportMethod: sni-only
        Origins:
        - Id: AlbOrigin
          DomainName: !GetAtt ApplicationLoadBalancer.DNSName
          VpcOriginConfig:
            OriginKeepaliveTimeout: 60
            OriginReadTimeout: 60
            VpcOriginId: !GetAtt CloudFrontVpcOrigin.Id
        Enabled: true
        DefaultCacheBehavior:
          TargetOriginId: AlbOrigin
          CachePolicyId: 83da9c7e-98b4-4e11-a168-04f0df8e2c65
          OriginRequestPolicyId: 216adef6-5c7f-47e4-b989-5492eafa07d3
          ViewerProtocolPolicy: https-only

The VPC Origins references the internal ALB, and only supports HTTPS protocol.

  ########### Cloudfront VPC Origin ###############
  CloudFrontVpcOrigin:
    Type: AWS::CloudFront::VpcOrigin
    Properties:
      VpcOriginEndpointConfig:
          Arn: !Ref ApplicationLoadBalancer
          Name: !Sub vpc-origin-${AWS::StackName}
          OriginProtocolPolicy: https-only
          OriginSSLProtocols: 
          - TLSv1.2

When the VPC Origins is created, the custom resource Lambda function adds an inbound rule to the CloudFront VPC Origin security group to allow traffic only from the CloudFront prefix list in the chosen Region.

        ec2_client.authorize_security_group_ingress(
            GroupId=cloudfront_sg_id,
            IpPermissions=[
                {
                    'IpProtocol': 'tcp',  
                    'FromPort': 443,      
                    'ToPort': 443,        
                    'PrefixListIds': [{'PrefixListId': cloudfront_prefix_id}]
                }
            ]
        )

Step 2: Create the ALB

The internal ALB is configured with an HTTPS listener using the user-provided SSL certificate. This maintains the encryption of the traffic between CloudFront and the ALB.

########### ALB Listener ###########  
  ALBListener:
    Type: AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::Listener
    Properties:
      DefaultActions:
        - Type: forward
          TargetGroupArn: !Ref ALBTargetGroup
      LoadBalancerArn: !Ref ApplicationLoadBalancer
      Port: '443'
      Protocol: HTTPS
      SslPolicy: ELBSecurityPolicy-TLS-1-2-2017-01
      Certificates:
        - CertificateArn: !Ref ALBCertificateARN

The target group of the ALB points to the execute API VPC endpoint IP addresses. These IP addresses are fetched using a custom resource Lambda function.

  ########### ALB Target Group ###########
  ALBTargetGroup:
    Type: AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup
    Properties:
      Port: 443
      Name: !Sub TargetGroup-${AWS::StackName}
      Protocol: HTTPS
      VpcId: !Ref VPCId
      Targets:
        - Id: !GetAtt GetPrivateIPs.IP0
          Port: 443
        - Id: !GetAtt GetPrivateIPs.IP1
          Port: 443
      TargetType: ip
      Matcher:
        HttpCode: '200,403'

The custom resource Lambda function fetches private IPs for given network interface IDs using the EC2 client and returns a dictionary with keys IP0 and IP1 values as the private IPs.

def fetch_interface_ips(network_interface_ids):
    """
    Fetch private IPs for given network interface IDs using ec2 client
    Returns a dictionary with keys IP0, IP1, etc. and values as the private IPs
    """
    responseData = {}
    
    # Use describe_network_interfaces instead of the resource approach
    response = ec2_client.describe_network_interfaces(
        NetworkInterfaceIds=network_interface_ids
    )
    
    for index, interface in enumerate(response['NetworkInterfaces']):
        responseData[f'IP{index}'] = interface['PrivateIpAddress']
    
    return responseData

Furthermore, the Lambda function adds an inbound rule to the internal ALB security group to allow traffic from the VPC Origin security group.

ec2_client.authorize_security_group_ingress(
            GroupId=security_group_id,
            IpPermissions=[
                {
                    'IpProtocol': 'tcp',  
                    'FromPort': 443,     
                    'ToPort': 443,  
                    'UserIdGroupPairs': [{'GroupId': cloudfront_sg_id}]
                }
            ]
        )

Step 3: Create the VPC endpoint for Private API Gateway

The execute-api VPC Endpoint is configured to route traffic from the internal ALB to the Private API Gateway. Only VPC endpoints can resolve private endpoints and route traffic securely.

  ########### execute-api VPC Endpoint ###########
  ExecuteApiVpcEndpoint:
    Type: AWS::EC2::VPCEndpoint
    Properties:
      ServiceName: !Sub "com.amazonaws.${AWS::Region}.execute-api"
      VpcId: !Ref VPCId
      SubnetIds: !Ref PrivateSubnets
      VpcEndpointType: Interface
      PrivateDnsEnabled: true
      SecurityGroupIds:
        - !Ref VpcEndpointSG 

Step 4: Create the Private API Gateway Resource Policy

The Resource Policy set up on the Private API Gateway only allows traffic from the VPC endpoint placed within the user-defined VPC.

        x-amazon-apigateway-policy:
          Version: "2012-10-17"
          Statement:
          - Effect: "Allow"
            Principal: "*"
            Action: "execute-api:Invoke"
            Resource: "execute-api:/*"
            Condition:
              StringEquals:
                aws:sourceVpce: 
                - !Ref ExecuteApiVpcEndpoint

Testing

Fetch the CloudFront URL from the Outputs section of the deployed stack and test it by using the curl command or your web browser.

curl https://{your custom domain name} 
{"message": "Hello from API GW"}

Conclusion

This post demonstrates how you can establish a secure architecture to access a Private REST API Gateway through a Private ALB, using Amazon CloudFront as the entry point for your application. The solution uses the CloudFront VPC Origins feature, a powerful capability that you can use to directly integrate CloudFront with resources that you host within your Amazon VPC. You can implement this architecture to significantly enhance your application’s security posture as you restrict access to your backend services and minimize the potential attack surface. This approach provides you with a robust and reliable method to protect your applications from unauthorized access while maintaining high availability and performance through the CloudFront global content delivery network.