Tag Archives: Technical How-to

Reducing Your Organization’s Carbon Footprint with Amazon CodeGuru Profiler

Post Syndicated from Isha Dua original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/reducing-your-organizations-carbon-footprint-with-codeguru-profiler/

It is crucial to examine every functional area when firms reorient their operations toward sustainable practices. Making informed decisions is necessary to reduce the environmental effect of an IT stack when creating, deploying, and maintaining it. To build a sustainable business for our customers and for the world we all share, we have deployed data centers that provide the efficient, resilient service our customers expect while minimizing our environmental footprint—and theirs. While we work to improve the energy efficiency of our datacenters, we also work to help our customers improve their operations on the AWS cloud. This two-pronged approach is based on the concept of the shared responsibility between AWS and AWS’ customers. As shown in the diagram below, AWS focuses on optimizing the sustainability of the cloud, while customers are responsible for sustainability in the cloud, meaning that AWS customers must optimize the workloads they have on the AWS cloud.

Figure 1. Shared responsibility model for sustainability

Figure 1. Shared responsibility model for sustainability

Just by migrating to the cloud, AWS customers become significantly more sustainable in their technology operations. On average, AWS customers use 77% fewer servers, 84% less power, and a 28% cleaner power mix, ultimately reducing their carbon emissions by 88% compared to when they ran workloads in their own data centers. These improvements are attributable to the technological advancements and economies of scale that AWS datacenters bring. However, there are still significant opportunities for AWS customers to make their cloud operations more sustainable. To uncover this, we must first understand how emissions are categorized.

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol organizes carbon emissions into the following scopes, along with relevant emission examples within each scope for a cloud provider such as AWS:

  • Scope 1: All direct emissions from the activities of an organization or under its control. For example, fuel combustion by data center backup generators.
  • Scope 2: Indirect emissions from electricity purchased and used to power data centers and other facilities. For example, emissions from commercial power generation.
  • Scope 3: All other indirect emissions from activities of an organization from sources it doesn’t control. AWS examples include emissions related to data center construction, and the manufacture and transportation of IT hardware deployed in data centers.

From an AWS customer perspective, emissions from customer workloads running on AWS are accounted for as indirect emissions, and part of the customer’s Scope 3 emissions. Each workload deployed generates a fraction of the total AWS emissions from each of the previous scopes. The actual amount varies per workload and depends on several factors including the AWS services used, the energy consumed by those services, the carbon intensity of the electric grids serving the AWS data centers where they run, and the AWS procurement of renewable energy.

At a high level, AWS customers approach optimization initiatives at three levels:

  • Application (Architecture and Design): Using efficient software designs and architectures to minimize the average resources required per unit of work.
  • Resource (Provisioning and Utilization): Monitoring workload activity and modifying the capacity of individual resources to prevent idling due to over-provisioning or under-utilization.
  • Code (Code Optimization): Using code profilers and other tools to identify the areas of code that use up the most time or resources as targets for optimization.

In this blogpost, we will concentrate on code-level sustainability improvements and how they can be realized using Amazon CodeGuru Profiler.

How CodeGuru Profiler improves code sustainability

Amazon CodeGuru Profiler collects runtime performance data from your live applications and provides recommendations that can help you fine-tune your application performance. Using machine learning algorithms, CodeGuru Profiler can help you find your most CPU-intensive lines of code, which contribute the most to your scope 3 emissions. CodeGuru Profiler then suggests ways to improve the code to make it less CPU demanding. CodeGuru Profiler provides different visualizations of profiling data to help you identify what code is running on the CPU, see how much time is consumed, and suggest ways to reduce CPU utilization. Optimizing your code with CodeGuru profiler leads to the following:

  • Improvements in application performance
  • Reduction in cloud cost, and
  • Reduction in the carbon emissions attributable to your cloud workload.

When your code performs the same task with less CPU, your applications run faster, customer experience improves, and your cost reduces alongside your cloud emission. CodeGuru Profiler generates the recommendations that help you make your code faster by using an agent that continuously samples stack traces from your application. The stack traces indicate how much time the CPU spends on each function or method in your code—information that is then transformed into CPU and latency data that is used to detect anomalies. When anomalies are detected, CodeGuru Profiler generates recommendations that clearly outline you should do to remediate the situation. Although CodeGuru Profiler has several visualizations that help you visualize your code, in many cases, customers can implement these recommendations without reviewing the visualizations. Let’s demonstrate this with a simple example.

Demonstration: Using CodeGuru Profiler to optimize a Lambda function

In this demonstration, the inefficiencies in a AWS Lambda function will be identified by CodeGuru Profiler.

Building our Lambda Function (10mins)

To keep this demonstration quick and simple, let’s create a simple lambda function that display’s ‘Hello World’. Before writing the code for this function, let’s review two important concepts. First, when writing Python code that runs on AWS and calls AWS services, two critical steps are required:

The Python code lines (that will be part of our function) that execute these steps listed above are shown below:

import boto3 #this will import AWS SDK library for Python
VariableName = boto3.client('dynamodb’) #this will create the AWS SDK service client

Secondly, functionally, AWS Lambda functions comprise of two sections:

  • Initialization code
  • Handler code

The first time a function is invoked (i.e., a cold start), Lambda downloads the function code, creates the required runtime environment, runs the initialization code, and then runs the handler code. During subsequent invocations (warm starts), to keep execution time low, Lambda bypasses the initialization code and goes straight to the handler code. AWS Lambda is designed such that the SDK service client created during initialization persists into the handler code execution. For this reason, AWS SDK service clients should be created in the initialization code. If the code lines for creating the AWS SDK service client are placed in the handler code, the AWS SDK service client will be recreated every time the Lambda function is invoked, needlessly increasing the duration of the Lambda function during cold and warm starts. This inadvertently increases CPU demand (and cost), which in turn increases the carbon emissions attributable to the customer’s code. Below, you can see the green and brown versions of the same Lambda function.

Now that we understand the importance of structuring our Lambda function code for efficient execution, let’s create a Lambda function that recreates the SDK service client. We will then watch CodeGuru Profiler flag this issue and generate a recommendation.

  1. Open AWS Lambda from the AWS Console and click on Create function.
  2. Select Author from scratch, name the function ‘demo-function’, select Python 3.9 under runtime, select x86_64 under Architecture.
  3. Expand Permissions, then choose whether to create a new execution role or use an existing one.
  4. Expand Advanced settings, and then select Function URL.
  5. For Auth type, choose AWS_IAM or NONE.
  6. Select Configure cross-origin resource sharing (CORS). By selecting this option during function creation, your function URL allows requests from all origins by default. You can edit the CORS settings for your function URL after creating the function.
  7. Choose Create function.
  8. In the code editor tab of the code source window, copy and paste the code below:
#invocation code
import json
import boto3

#handler code
def lambda_handler(event, context):
  client = boto3.client('dynamodb') #create AWS SDK Service client’
  #simple codeblock for demonstration purposes  
  output = ‘Hello World’
  print(output)
  #handler function return

  return output

Ensure that the handler code is properly indented.

  1. Save the code, Deploy, and then Test.
  2. For the first execution of this Lambda function, a test event configuration dialog will appear. On the Configure test event dialog window, leave the selection as the default (Create new event), enter ‘demo-event’ as the Event name, and leave the hello-world template as the Event template.
  3. When you run the code by clicking on Test, the console should return ‘Hello World’.
  4. To simulate actual traffic, let’s run a curl script that will invoke the Lambda function every 0.2 seconds. On a bash terminal, run the following command:
while true; do curl {Lambda Function URL]; sleep 0.06; done

If you do not have git bash installed, you can use AWS Cloud 9 which supports curl commands.

Enabling CodeGuru Profiler for our Lambda function

We will now set up CodeGuru Profiler to monitor our Lambda function. For Lambda functions running on Java 8 (Amazon Corretto), Java 11, and Python 3.8 or 3.9 runtimes, CodeGuru Profiler can be enabled through a single click in the configuration tab in the AWS Lambda console.  Other runtimes can be enabled following a series of steps that can be found in the CodeGuru Profiler documentation for Java and the Python.

Our demo code is written in Python 3.9, so we will enable Profiler from the configuration tab in the AWS Lambda console.

  1. On the AWS Lambda console, select the demo-function that we created.
  2. Navigate to Configuration > Monitoring and operations tools, and click Edit on the right side of the page.

  1.  Scroll down to Amazon CodeGuru Profiler and click the button next to Code profiling to turn it on. After enabling Code profiling, click Save.

Note: CodeGuru Profiler requires 5 minutes of Lambda runtime data to generate results. After your Lambda function provides this runtime data, which may need multiple runs if your lambda has a short runtime, it will display within the Profiling group page in the CodeGuru Profiler console. The profiling group will be given a default name (i.e., aws-lambda-<lambda-function-name>), and it will take approximately 15 minutes after CodeGuru Profiler receives the runtime data for this profiling group to appear. Be patient. Although our function duration is ~33ms, our curl script invokes the application once every 0.06 seconds. This should give profiler sufficient information to profile our function in a couple of hours. After 5 minutes, our profiling group should appear in the list of active profiling groups as shown below.

Depending on how frequently your Lambda function is invoked, it can take up to 15 minutes to aggregate profiles, after which you can see your first visualization in the CodeGuru Profiler console. The granularity of the first visualization depends on how active your function was during those first 5 minutes of profiling—an application that is idle most of the time doesn’t have many data points to plot in the default visualization. However, you can remedy this by looking at a wider time period of profiled data, for example, a day or even up to a week, if your application has very low CPU utilization. For our demo function, a recommendation should appear after about an hour. By this time, the profiling groups list should show that our profiling group now has one recommendation.

Profiler has now flagged the repeated creation of the SDK service client with every invocation.

From the information provided, we can see that our CPU is spending 5x more computing time than expected on the recreation of the SDK service client. The estimated cost impact of this inefficiency is also provided. In production environments, the cost impact of seemingly minor inefficiencies can scale very quickly to several kilograms of CO2 and hundreds of dollars as invocation frequency, and the number of Lambda functions increase.

CodeGuru Profiler integrates with Amazon DevOps Guru, a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers and operators to improve the performance and availability of their applications. Amazon DevOps Guru analyzes operational data and application metrics to identify behaviors that deviate from normal operating patterns. Once these operational anomalies are detected, DevOps Guru presents intelligent recommendations that address current and predicted future operational issues. By integrating with CodeGuru Profiler, customers can now view operational anomalies and code optimization recommendations on the DevOps Guru console. The integration, which is enabled by default, is only applicable to Lambda resources that are supported by CodeGuru Profiler and monitored by both DevOps Guru and CodeGuru.

We can now stop the curl loop (Control+C) so that the Lambda function stops running. Next, we delete the profiling group that was created when we enabled profiling in Lambda, and then delete the Lambda function or repurpose as needed.

Conclusion

Cloud sustainability is a shared responsibility between AWS and our customers. While we work to make our datacenter more sustainable, customers also have to work to make their code, resources, and applications more sustainable, and CodeGuru Profiler can help you improve code sustainability, as demonstrated above. To start Profiling your code today, visit the CodeGuru Profiler documentation page. To start monitoring your applications, head over to the Amazon DevOps Guru documentation page.

About the authors:

Isha Dua

Isha Dua is a Senior Solutions Architect based in San Francisco Bay Area. She helps AWS Enterprise customers grow by understanding their goals and challenges, and guiding them on how they can architect their applications in a cloud native manner while making sure they are resilient and scalable. She’s passionate about machine learning technologies and Environmental Sustainability.

Christian Tomeldan

Christian Tomeldan is a DevOps Engineer turned Solutions Architect. Operating out of San Francisco, he is passionate about technology and conveys that passion to customers ensuring they grow with the right support and best practices. He focuses his technical depth mostly around Containers, Security, and Environmental Sustainability.

Ifeanyi Okafor

Ifeanyi Okafor is a Product Manager with AWS. He enjoys building products that solve customer problems at scale.

Detect and block advanced bot traffic

Post Syndicated from Etienne Munnich original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/detect-and-block-advanced-bot-traffic/

Automated scripts, known as bots, can generate significant volumes of traffic to your mobile applications, websites, and APIs. Targeted bots take this a step further by targeting website content, such as product availability or pricing.

Traffic from targeted bots can result in a poor user experience by competing against legitimate user traffic for website access to high-demand inventory, increasing business risk through chargebacks from fraudulent transactions, and increasing infrastructure costs.

In 2021, AWS released AWS WAF Bot Control for Common Bots to help you detect and control common bots. In October 2022, AWS released a new feature—AWS Bot Control for Targeted Bots—that can help you detect and protect against bots that use advanced techniques to actively avoid detection.

In this post, I provide an overview of Bot Control for Targeted Bots and show you how to enable Bot Control to detect and block both common and targeted bots.

Overview of Bot Control for Targeted Bots

Bot Control for Targeted Bots provides sophisticated bot detection and mitigation by creating an intelligent baseline of traffic patterns. Bot Control for Targeted Bots uses browser fingerprinting techniques and client-side JavaScript interrogation methods to help protect your application from advanced bots that mimic human traffic patterns and actively try to evade detection.

Bot Control detects anomalies in usage patterns and provides new flexible mitigation options to isolate bad bots. These options include dynamic rate-limiting, challenge actions, and the ability to block based on labels and confidence scores.

With Bot Control for Targeted Bots, you can use bot protection rules to allow verified common bot traffic and, at the same time, to challenge unwanted advanced bot traffic. You can achieve both tasks from the same configuration page without making application or architectural changes. You can also configure fine-grained rule sets. For example, you can configure blocking actions for high-risk bots while allowing for exceptions for known IP ranges.

This release also introduces token domains, which is the ability to use the same AWS WAF web ACL across multiple domain names and Amazon CloudFront distributions to simplify client-side configuration. For example, you can use token domains to accept tokens that are generated by www.example.com for api.example.com and vice versa. In addition, you can now specify a resource path directly in the managed rule configuration, enabling you to only require a token for API calls, but not for cached, content-like images.

Bot Control for Targeted Bots sends metrics to Amazon CloudWatch to identify application access trends. The metrics include the percentage of human traffic compared to bot traffic and the count of requests for sensitive web pages such as login and checkout pages. Each rule in Bot Control produces a unique label so that you can review CloudWatch metrics and filter logs to understand traffic patterns. By using these mechanisms, you can identify, isolate, and remediate operational issues.

Walkthrough

In this walkthrough, I will show you how to set up Bot Control for Targeted Bots to help protect a CloudFront distribution.

You will set up an AWS WAF web ACL with an AWS Managed Rule for Bot Control for Targeted Bots. The rule detects bots and then decides the appropriate action:

  • Dynamically rate limit verified bots – Based on traffic history, Bot Control creates an intelligent baseline and then applies rate limits to abnormally high volumes.
  • Enable the challenge action – You have a new option, called challenge, along with the already supported options of count, allow, block, and CAPTCHA. The challenge option initiates a process of challenge interstitial, which means that Bot Control provides a challenge to the browser and creates a domain token when the challenge is resolved.

Set up Bot Control for Targeted Bots

In this section, I will show you how to set up Bot Control for Targeted Bots by creating a new web ACL or editing an existing one.

To set up Bot Control for Targeted Bots

  1. Open the AWS WAF console, and then do one of the following:
    • To create a new web ACL, choose Create a new web ACL.
    • To edit an existing web ACL, choose the name of the ACL.
  2. On the Rules tab, for the Add rules drop-down, select Add managed rule groups.
  3. Add a Bot Control rule set to the web ACL. Choose Edit to edit the rule.
  4. For Bot Control inspection level, select the inspection level for Bot Control. For this walkthrough, we chose Targeted to enable Bot Control for Targeted Bots.
    Figure 1: Bot Control – Select inspection level

    Figure 1: Bot Control – Select inspection level

  5. Review and select the actions to be taken on each category of bots detected, and then choose Save rule. In our example, we set allow, challenge, and count rules for the categories, as shown in Figure 2.
    Figure 2: Bot Control – Select actions for each category

    Figure 2: Bot Control – Select actions for each category

    You can select different actions for each category based on your application security needs:

    • Allow: Allows the request to be sent to a protected resource.
    • Block: Blocks the request, returning an HTTP 403 (Forbidden) response.
    • Count: Allows the request to be sent to the protected resource while counting detections. The count shows you bot activity that is occurring without blocking or challenging. When you turn on rules for the first time, this information can help you see what the detections are, before you change the actions.
    • CAPTCHA and Challenge: use CAPTCHA puzzles and silent challenges with tokens to track successful client responses.
  6. In this example you will configure a scope-down statement to apply Bot Control for a given URI path only.

    On the same page in the step above, you can add a scope-down statement to ensure you use and incur Targeted Bots charges for the requests where you need protections. There are more examples of how to use scope-down statements in our documentation.

    Select “Enable scope-down statement” and configure the rule to inspect the URI path as per figure 3.

    Figure 3: Bot Control – Add the scope-down statement

    Figure 3: Bot Control – Add the scope-down statement

  7. To add domain names to be protected, scroll to the bottom of the web ACL and choose Edit. In the Token domain list – optional section, enter the domain name or names to which the token verification applies. Tokens that are generated are valid for these domains.

Create the SDK link for the AWS WAF integration

In this section, I’ll show you how to find the AWS WAF SDK and add it to your application pages.

The token SDK manages the token authorization and includes the tokens in the requests that you send to your protected resources. By adding the SDK link to application pages, you can help ensure that the remote procedure calls by your client contain a valid token.

To add the SDK to your application pages

  1. In the AWS WAF console, in the left navigation pane, choose Application integration SDKs.
  2. Under JavaScript SDK, copy the provided code snippet. This code snippet allows for creation of the cryptographic token in the background when the application loads for the first time, providing a better customer experience.
  3. Add the code snippet to your pages. For example, paste the provided script code within the <head> section of the HTML.

When this integration is in place on your application’s pages, you can add AWS WAF rules in your web ACL to block requests that don’t contain a valid token. Replace the <Web ACL integration URL> with the provided integration URL from the AWS WAF console or copy the script tag from the console:

<script type="text/javascript" src="<Web ACL integration URL>/challenge.js” defer></script>

Figure 4 shows the SDK link for application pages.

Figure 4: Bot Control – Add SDK link to application pages

Figure 4: Bot Control – Add SDK link to application pages

Review metrics

Now that you’ve set up the web ACL and application, you can use the bot visualization dashboard to review bot traffic patterns. Bot rules emit metrics corresponding to their labels, helping you identify which rule within the AWS Managed Rule for Bot Control for Targeted Bots initiated an action. You can also use these labels and rule actions to filter AWS WAF logs so that you can further examine a request.

To view AWS WAF metrics for the distribution

  1. In the AWS WAF console, in the left navigation pane, select Web ACLs.
  2. Select the web ACL that Bot Control is enabled on and then choose the Bot Control tab to view the metrics.
Figure 5: Bot Control – Review web ACL metrics

Figure 5: Bot Control – Review web ACL metrics

Best practices

In this section, I describe best practices for your Bot Control setup.

Set priority ordering of AWS WAF rules to help lower costs

You can set the priority of rule groups in a web ACL such that the order of the rule matches requests more efficiently. AWS WAF will take the action associated to the first rule it matches. If the incoming traffic matches the more wider criteria (such as IPset rules at priority 1), the associated action is taken. That request is never analyzed by the Bot Control rule and hence do not incur the bot control request analysis fees. For example, the following list shows rules ranked in order from highest priority (1) to lowest priority (5):

  1. Use allow and deny lists – provide IP addresses to allow or deny
  2. AWS Managed Rule groups for IP reputation – block bots and other threats
  3. General rate limit – help prevent HTTP flood across the protected resource
  4. AWS WAF Bot Control rule group – scoped-down to exclude static content such as images
  5. Rate limit for login pages – scoped-down for specific URLs and HTTP POST methods

Figure 6 shows the prioritized rules in AWS WAF.

Figure 6: AWS WAF – Web ACL rule order

Figure 6: AWS WAF – Web ACL rule order

Use scope-down statements

You can use scope-down statements to limit the requests evaluated for a rule group. For example, a scope-down statement that excludes checking requests for static assets, such as images for a given URI and HTTP method (GET), can help reduce Bot Control costs.

Block requests without tokens

If a request has a token absent or is rejected, you can block that request. For example, you might want to block requests on login or payment processing pages. To block requests with a missing or rejected token, add a rule to run after the Bot Control rule to block requests matching the labels rejected and absent:

  • awswaf:managed:token:rejected – The request token is present but is either corrupt or has an expired challenge timestamp.
  • awswaf:managed:token:absent – The request doesn’t have a token.

Use SDK integration

After you add the token domains and the provided script to your application pages, you can add a rule to block requests that don’t have a token. Use of the SDK helps AWS WAF verify the client application with silent challenges and provide AWS token acquisition and management. The SDK provides the full functionality of both AWS WAF Bot Control and AWS WAF Fraud Control, reducing the need for multiple SDKs if either or both rule groups are used in the web ACL.

Create CloudWatch alarms

You can add CloudWatch alarms to help you assess whether there is activity outside of the norm for your application. For example, you can monitor for a high number of token-absent metrics for a given time period.

Configure a billing alarm

To help you track costs, you can configure a billing alarm that sends an alert when you have exceeded the threshold for your expected costs.

Pricing and availability

Bot Control for Targeted Bots is available today in AWS Regions where AWS WAF is available, excluding AWS GovCloud (US) and China Regions. For information on pricing, see AWS WAF Pricing.

Conclusion

In this post, you learned how to use Bot Control for Targeted Bots to add visibility into bot activity on your website or applications. With Bot Control for common and targeted bots, you can detect, challenge, and block unwanted bot activity. Because Bot Control is customizable, you can tailor how you address legitimate bots while protecting against bots that use advanced techniques to actively avoid detection. For more information and to get started today, see AWS WAF Bot Control.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.

Etienne Munnich

Etienne Munnich

Etienne works as an Edge Specialist Solutions Architect, assisting start ups and companies of all sizes across Asia Pacific to improve their web applications performance and security. Based in Sydney, Australia, he has fulfilled many roles in tech, which range from systems integrator to cloud engineer, project manager and now a solutions architect. Follow him on Twitter at @etiennemunnich

Introducing the AWS Lambda Telemetry API

Post Syndicated from Julian Wood original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/introducing-the-aws-lambda-telemetry-api/

This blog post is written by Anton Aleksandrov, Principal Solution Architect and Shridhar Pandey, Senior Product Manager

Today AWS is announcing the AWS Lambda Telemetry API. This provides an easier way to receive enhanced function telemetry directly from the Lambda service and send it to custom destinations. Developers and operators can now more easily monitor and observe their Lambda functions using Lambda extensions from their preferred observability tool providers.

Extensions can use the Lambda Logs API to collect logs generated by the Lambda service and code running in their Lambda function. While the Logs API provides extensions with access to logs, it does not provide a way to collect additional telemetry, such as traces and metrics, which the Lambda service generates during initialization and invocation of your Lambda function.

Previously, observability tools retrieved traces from AWS X-Ray using the AWS X-Ray API or built their own custom tracing libraries to generate traces during Lambda function invocation. Tools required customers to modify AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies to grant access to the traces from X-Ray. This caused additional complexity for tools to collect traces and metrics from multiple sources and introduced latency in seeing Lambda function traces in observability tool dashboards.

The Lambda Telemetry API is a new API that enhances the existing Lambda Logs API functionality. With the new Telemetry API, observability tools can receive function and extension logs, and also events, traces, and metrics directly from within the Lambda service. You do not need to install additional tracing libraries. This reduces latency and simplifies access permissions, as the extension does not require additional access to X-Ray.

Today you can use Telemetry API-enabled extensions to send telemetry data to Coralogix, Datadog, Dynatrace, Lumigo, New Relic, Sedai, Site24x7, Serverless.com, Sumo Logic, Sysdig, Thundra, or your own custom destinations.

Overview

To receive logs, extensions subscribe using the new Lambda Telemetry API.

Lambda Telemetry API

Lambda Telemetry API

The Lambda service then streams the telemetry events directly to the extension. The events include platform events, trace spans, function and extension logs, and additional Lambda platform metrics. The extension can then process, filter, and route them to any preferred destination.

You can add an extension from the tooling provider of your choice to your Lambda function. You can deploy extensions, including ones that use the Telemetry API, as Lambda layers, with the AWS Management Console and AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI). You can also use infrastructure as code tools such as AWS CloudFormation, the AWS Serverless Application Model (AWS SAM), Serverless Framework, and Terraform.

Lambda Extensions from the AWS Partner Network (APN) available at launch

Today, you can use Lambda extensions that use Telemetry API from the following Lambda partners:

  • The Coralogix AWS Lambda Telemetry Exporter extension now offers improved monitoring and alerting for Lambda functions by further streamlining collection and correlation of logs, metrics, and traces.
  • The Datadog extension further simplifies how you visualize the impact of cold starts, and monitor and alert on latency, duration, and payload size of your Lambda functions by collecting logs, traces, and real-time metrics from your function in a simple and cost-effective way.
  • Dynatrace now provides a simplified observability configuration for AWS Lambda through a seamless integration. The new solution delivers low-latency telemetry, enables monitoring at scale, and helps reduce monitoring costs for your serverless workloads.
  • The Lumigo lambda-log-shipper extension simplifies aggregating and forwarding Lambda logs to third-party tools. It now also makes it easy for you to detect Lambda function timeouts.
  • The New Relic extension now provides a unified observability view for your Lambda functions with insights that help you better understand and optimize the performance of your functions.
  • Sedai now uses the Telemetry API to help you improve the performance and availability of your Lambda functions by gathering insights about your function and providing recommendations for manual and autonomous remediation in a cost-effective manner.
  • The Site24x7 extension now offers new metrics, which enable you to get deeper insights into the different phases of the Lambda function lifecycle, such as initialization and invocation.
  • Serverless.com now uses the Telemetry API to provide real-time performance details for your Lambda function through the Dev Mode feature of their new Serverless Console V.2 offering, which simplifies debugging in the AWS Cloud.
  • Sumo Logic now makes it easier, faster, and more cost-effective for you to get your mission-critical Lambda function telemetry sent directly to Sumo Logic so you could quickly analyze and remediate errors and exceptions.
  • The Sysdig Monitor extension generates and collects real-time metrics directly from the Lambda platform. The simplified instrumentation offers lower latency, reduced MTTR (mean time to resolution) for critical issues, and cost benefits while monitoring your serverless applications.
  • The Thundra extension enables you to export logs, metrics, and events for Lambda execution environment lifecycle events emitted by the Telemetry API to a destination of your choice such as an S3 bucket, a database, or a monitoring backend.

Seeing example Telemetry API extensions in action

This demo shows an example of using a telemetry extension to receive telemetry, batch, and send it to a desired destination.

To set up the example, visit the GitHub repo for the extension implemented in the language of your choice and follow the instructions in the README.md file.

To configure the batching behavior, which controls when the extension sends the data, set the Lambda environment variable DISPATCH_MIN_BATCH_SIZE. When the extension receives the batch threshold, it POSTs the telemetry events batch to the destination specified in the DISPATCH_POST_URI environment variable.

You can configure an example DISPATCH_POST_URL for the extension to deliver the telemetry data using https://webhook.site/.

Lambda environment variables

Lambda environment variables

Telemetry events for one invoke may be received and processed during the next invocation. Events for the last invoke may be processed during the SHUTDOWN event.

Test and invoke the function from the Lambda console, or AWS CLI. You can see that the webhook receives the telemetry data.

Webhook receiving telemetry data

Webhook receiving telemetry data

You can also view the function and extension logs in CloudWatch Logs. The example extension includes verbose logging to understand the extension lifecycle.

CloudWatch Logs showing extension verbose logging

Sample Telemetry API events

When the extension receives telemetry data, each event contains a JSON dictionary with additional information, such as related metrics or trace spans. The following example shows a function initialization event. You can see that the function initializes with on-demand concurrency. The runtime version is Node.js 14, the initialization is successful, and the initialization duration is 123 milliseconds.

{
  "time": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
  "type": "platform.initStart",
  "record": {
    "initializationType": "on-demand",
    "phase":"init",
    "runtimeVersion": "nodejs-14.v3",
    "runtimeVersionArn": "arn"
  }
}

{
  "time": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
  "type": "platform.initRuntimeDone",
  "record": {
    "initializationType": "on-demand",
    "status": "success"
  }
}

{
  "time": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
  "type": "platform.initReport",
  "record": {
    "initializationType": "on-demand",
    "phase":"init",
    "metrics": {
      "durationMs": 123.0,
    }
  }
}

Function invocation events include the associated requestId and tracing information connecting this invocation with the X-Ray tracing context, and platform spans showing response latency and response duration as well as invocation metrics such as duration in milliseconds.

{
    "time": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
    "type": "platform.start",
    "record": {
      "requestId": "e6b761a9-c52d-415d-b040-7ba94b9452f3",
      "version": "$LATEST",
      "tracing": {
        "spanId": "54565fb41ac79632",
        "type": "X-Amzn-Trace-Id",
        "value": "Root=1-62e900b2-710d76f009d6e7785905449a;Parent=0efbd19962d95b05;Sampled=1"
      }
    }
  }
  
  {
    "time": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
    "type": "platform.runtimeDone",
    "record": {
      "requestId": "e6b761a9-c52d-415d-b040-7ba94b9452f3",
      "status": "success",
      "tracing": {
        "spanId": "54565fb41ac79632",
        "type": "X-Amzn-Trace-Id",
        "value": "Root=1-62e900b2-710d76f009d6e7785905449a;Parent=0efbd19962d95b05;Sampled=1"
      },
      "spans": [
        {
          "name": "responseLatency", 
          "start": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
          "durationMs": 23.02
        },
        {
          "name": "responseDuration", 
          "start": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
          "durationMs": 20
        }
      ],
      "metrics": {
        "durationMs": 200.0,
        "producedBytes": 15
      }
    }
  }
  
  {
    "time": "2022-08-02T12:01:23.521Z",
    "type": "platform.report",
    "record": {
      "requestId": "e6b761a9-c52d-415d-b040-7ba94b9452f3",
      "metrics": {
        "durationMs": 220.0,
        "billedDurationMs": 300,
        "memorySizeMB": 128,
        "maxMemoryUsedMB": 90,
        "initDurationMs": 200.0
      },
      "tracing": {
        "spanId": "54565fb41ac79632",
        "type": "X-Amzn-Trace-Id",
        "value": "Root=1-62e900b2-710d76f009d6e7785905449a;Parent=0efbd19962d95b05;Sampled=1"
      }
    }
  }

Building a Telemetry API extension

Lambda extensions run as independent processes in the execution environment and continue to run after the function invocation is fully processed. Because extensions run as separate processes, you can write them in a language different from the function code. We recommend implementing extensions using a compiled language as a self-contained binary. This makes the extension compatible with all the supported runtimes.

Extensions that use the Telemetry API have the following lifecycle.

Telemetry API lifecycle

Telemetry API lifecycle

  1. The extension registers itself using the Lambda Extension API and subscribes to receive INVOKE and SHUTDOWN events. With the Telemetry API, the registration response body contains additional information, such as function name, function version, and account ID.
  2. The extensions start a telemetry listener. This is a local HTTP or TCP endpoint. We recommend using HTTP rather than TCP.
  3. The extensions use the Telemetry API to subscribe to desired telemetry event streams.
  4. The Lambda service POSTs telemetry stream data to your telemetry listener. We recommend batching the telemetry data as it arrives to the listener. You can perform any custom processing on this data and send it on to an S3 bucket, other custom destination, or an external observability service.

See the Telemetry API documentation and sample extensions for additional details.

The Lambda Telemetry API supersedes the Lambda Logs API. While the Logs API remains fully functional, AWS recommends using the Telemetry API. New functionality is only available with the Extensions API. Extensions can only subscribe to either the Logs or Telemetry API. After subscribing to one of them, any attempt to subscribe to the other returns an error.

Mapping Telemetry API schema to OpenTelemetry spans

The Lambda Telemetry API schema is semantically compatible with OpenTelemetry (OTEL). You can use events received from the Telemetry API to build and report OTEL spans. Three Telemetry API lifecycle events represent a single function invocation: start, runtimeDone, and runtimeReport. You should represent this as a single OTEL span. You can add additional details to your spans using information available in runtimeDone events under the event.spans property.

Mapping of Telemetry API events to OTEL spans is described in the Telemetry API documentation.

Metrics and pricing

The Telemetry API introduces new per-invoke metrics to help you understand the impact of extensions on your function’s performance. The metrics are available within the report.runtimeDone event.

  • platform.runtime measures the time taken by the Lambda Runtime to run your function handler code.
  • producedBytes measures the number of bytes returned during the invoke phase.

There are also two new trace spans available within the report.runtimeDone event:

  • responseLatencyMs measures the time taken by the Runtime to send a response.
  • responseDurationMs measures the time taken by the Runtime to finish sending the response from when it starts streaming it.

Extensions using Telemetry API, like other extensions, share the same billing model as Lambda functions. When using Lambda functions with extensions, you pay for requests served, and the combined compute time used to run your code and all extensions, in 1-ms increments. To learn more about the billing for extensions, visit the Lambda pricing page.

Useful links

Conclusion

The Lambda Telemetry API allows you to receive enhanced telemetry data more easily using your preferred monitoring and observability tools. The Telemetry API enhances the functionality of the Logs API to receive logs, metrics, and traces directly from the Lambda service. Developers and operators can send telemetry to destinations without custom libraries, with reduced latency, and simplified permissions.

To see how the Telemetry API works, try the demos in the GitHub repository.

Build your own extensions using the Telemetry API today, or use extensions provided by the Lambda observability partners.

For more serverless learning resources, visit Serverless Land.

Enrich VPC Flow Logs with resource tags and deliver data to Amazon S3 using Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

Post Syndicated from Chaitanya Shah original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/enrich-vpc-flow-logs-with-resource-tags-and-deliver-data-to-amazon-s3-using-amazon-kinesis-data-firehose/

VPC Flow Logs is an AWS feature that captures information about the network traffic flows going to and from network interfaces in Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC). Visibility to the network traffic flows of your application can help you troubleshoot connectivity issues, architect your application and network for improved performance, and improve security of your application.

Each VPC flow log record contains the source and destination IP address fields for the traffic flows. The records also contain the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance ID that generated the traffic flow, which makes it easier to identify the EC2 instance and its associated VPC, subnet, and Availability Zone from where the traffic originated. However, when you have a large number of EC2 instances running in your environment, it may not be obvious where the traffic is coming from or going to simply based on the EC2 instance IDs or IP addresses contained in the VPC flow log records.

By enriching flow log records with additional metadata such as resource tags associated with the source and destination resources, you can more easily understand and analyze traffic patterns in your environment. For example, customers often tag their resources with resource names and project names. By enriching flow log records with resource tags, you can easily query and view flow log records based on an EC2 instance name, or identify all traffic for a certain project.

In addition, you can add resource context and metadata about the destination resource such as the destination EC2 instance ID and its associated VPC, subnet, and Availability Zone based on the destination IP in the flow logs. This way, you can easily query your flow logs to identify traffic crossing Availability Zones or VPCs.

In this post, you will learn how to enrich flow logs with tags associated with resources from VPC flow logs in a completely serverless model using Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose and the recently launched Amazon VPC IP Address Manager (IPAM), and also analyze and visualize the flow logs using Amazon Athena and Amazon QuickSight.

Solution overview

In this solution, you enable VPC flow logs and stream them to Kinesis Data Firehose. This solution enriches log records using an AWS Lambda function on Kinesis Data Firehose in a completely serverless manner. The Lambda function fetches resource tags for the instance ID. It also looks up the destination resource from the destination IP using the Amazon EC2 API and IPAM, and adds the associated VPC network context and metadata for the destination resource. It then stores the enriched log records in an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket. After you have enriched your flow logs, you can query, view, and analyze them in a wide variety of services, such as AWS Glue, Athena, QuickSight, Amazon OpenSearch Service, as well as solutions from the AWS Partner Network such as Splunk and Datadog.

The following diagram illustrates the solution architecture.

Architecture

The workflow contains the following steps:

  1. Amazon VPC sends the VPC flow logs to the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream.
  2. The delivery stream uses a Lambda function to fetch resource tags for instance IDs from the flow log record and add it to the record. You can also fetch tags for the source and destination IP address and enrich the flow log record.
  3. When the Lambda function finishes processing all the records from the Kinesis Data Firehose buffer with enriched information like resource tags, Kinesis Data Firehose stores the result file in the destination S3 bucket. Any failed records that Kinesis Data Firehose couldn’t process are stored in the destination S3 bucket under the prefix you specify during delivery stream setup.
  4. All the logs for the delivery stream and Lambda function are stored in Amazon CloudWatch log groups.

Prerequisites

As a prerequisite, you need to create the target S3 bucket before creating the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream.

If using a Windows computer, you need PowerShell; if using a Mac, you need Terminal to run AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) commands. To install the latest version of the AWS CLI, refer to Installing or updating the latest version of the AWS CLI.

Create a Lambda function

You can download the Lambda function code from the GitHub repo used in this solution. The example in this post assumes you are enabling all the available fields in the VPC flow logs. You can use it as is or customize per your needs. For example, if you intend to use the default fields when enabling the VPC flow logs, you need to modify the Lambda function with the respective fields. Creating this function creates an AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) Lambda execution role.

To create your Lambda function, complete the following steps:

  1. On the Lambda console, choose Functions in the navigation pane.
  2. Choose Create function.
  3. Select Author from scratch.
  4. For Function name, enter a name.
  5. For Runtime, choose Python 3.8.
  6. For Architecture, select x86_64.
  7. For Execution role, select Create a new role with basic Lambda permissions.
  8. Choose Create function.

Create Lambda Function

You can then see code source page, as shown in the following screenshot, with the default code in the lambda_function.py file.

  1. Delete the default code and enter the code from the GitHub Lambda function aws-vpc-flowlogs-enricher.py.
  2. Choose Deploy.

VPC Flow Logs Enricher function

To enrich the flow logs with additional tag information, you need to create an additional IAM policy to give Lambda permission to describe tags on resources from the VPC flow logs.

  1. On the IAM console, choose Policies in the navigation pane.
  2. Choose Create policy.
  3. On the JSON tab, enter the JSON code as shown in the following screenshot.

This policy gives the Lambda function permission to retrieve tags for the source and destination IP and retrieve the VPC ID, subnet ID, and other relevant metadata for the destination IP from your VPC flow log record.

  1. Choose Next: Tags.

Tags

  1. Add any tags and choose Next: Review.

  1. For Name, enter vpcfl-describe-tag-policy.
  2. For Description, enter a description.
  3. Choose Create policy.

Create IAM Policy

  1. Navigate to the previously created Lambda function and choose Permissions in the navigation pane.
  2. Choose the role that was created by Lambda function.

A page opens in a new tab.

  1. On the Add permissions menu, choose Attach policies.

Add Permissions

  1. Search for the vpcfl-describe-tag-policy you just created.
  2. Select the vpcfl-describe-tag-policy and choose Attach policies.

Create the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream

To create your delivery stream, complete the following steps:

  1. On the Kinesis Data Firehose console, choose Create delivery stream.
  2. For Source, choose Direct PUT.
  3. For Destination, choose Amazon S3.

Kinesis Firehose Stream Source and Destination

After you choose Amazon S3 for Destination, the Transform and convert records section appears.

  1. For Data transformation, select Enable.
  2. Browse and choose the Lambda function you created earlier.
  3. You can customize the buffer size as needed.

This impacts on how many records the delivery stream will buffer before it flushes it to Amazon S3.

  1. You can also customize the buffer interval as needed.

This impacts how long (in seconds) the delivery stream will buffer the incoming records from the VPC.

  1. Optionally, you can enable Record format conversion.

If you want to query from Athena, it’s recommended to convert it to Apache Parquet or ORC and compress the files with available compression algorithms, such as gzip and snappy. For more performance tips, refer to Top 10 Performance Tuning Tips for Amazon Athena. In this post, record format conversion is disabled.

Transform and Conver records

  1. For S3 bucket, choose Browse and choose the S3 bucket you created as a prerequisite to store the flow logs.
  2. Optionally, you can specify the S3 bucket prefix. The following expression creates a Hive-style partition for year, month, and day:

AWSLogs/year=!{timestamp:YYYY}/month=!{timestamp:MM}/day=!{timestamp:dd}/

  1. Optionally, you can enable dynamic partitioning.

Dynamic partitioning enables you to create targeted datasets by partitioning streaming S3 data based on partitioning keys. The right partitioning can help you to save costs related to the amount of data that is scanned by analytics services like Athena. For more information, see Kinesis Data Firehose now supports dynamic partitioning to Amazon S3.

Note that you can enable dynamic partitioning only when you create a new delivery stream. You can’t enable dynamic partitioning for an existing delivery stream.

Destination Settings

  1. Expand Buffer hints, compression and encryption.
  2. Set the buffer size to 128 and buffer interval to 900 for best performance.
  3. For Compression for data records, select GZIP.

S3 Buffer settings

Create a VPC flow log subscription

Now you create a VPC flow log subscription for the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream you created.

Navigate to AWS CloudShell or Terminal/PowerShell for a Mac or Windows computer and run the following AWS CLI command to enable the subscription. Provide your VPC ID for the parameter --resource-ids and delivery stream ARN for the parameter --log-destination.

aws ec2 create-flow-logs \ 
--resource-type VPC \ 
--resource-ids vpc-0000012345f123400d \ 
--traffic-type ALL \ 
--log-destination-type kinesis-data-firehose \ 
--log-destination arn:aws:firehose:us-east-1:123456789101:deliverystream/PUT-Kinesis-Demo-Stream \ 
--max-aggregation-interval 60 \ 
--log-format '${account-id} ${action} ${az-id} ${bytes} ${dstaddr} ${dstport} ${end} ${flow-direction} ${instance-id} ${interface-id} ${log-status} ${packets} ${pkt-dst-aws-service} ${pkt-dstaddr} ${pkt-src-aws-service} ${pkt-srcaddr} ${protocol} ${region} ${srcaddr} ${srcport} ${start} ${sublocation-id} ${sublocation-type} ${subnet-id} ${tcp-flags} ${traffic-path} ${type} ${version} ${vpc-id}'

If you’re running CloudShell for the first time, it will take a few seconds to prepare the environment to run.

After you successfully enable the subscription for your VPC flow logs, it takes a few minutes depending on the intervals mentioned in the setup to create the log record files in the destination S3 folder.

To view those files, navigate to the Amazon S3 console and choose the bucket storing the flow logs. You should see the compressed interval logs, as shown in the following screenshot.

S3 destination bucket

You can download any file from the destination S3 bucket on your computer. Then extract the gzip file and view it in your favorite text editor.

The following is a sample enriched flow log record, with the new fields in bold providing added context and metadata of the source and destination IP addresses:

{'account-id': '123456789101',
 'action': 'ACCEPT',
 'az-id': 'use1-az2',
 'bytes': '7251',
 'dstaddr': '10.10.10.10',
 'dstport': '52942',
 'end': '1661285182',
 'flow-direction': 'ingress',
 'instance-id': 'i-123456789',
 'interface-id': 'eni-0123a456b789d',
 'log-status': 'OK',
 'packets': '25',
 'pkt-dst-aws-service': '-',
 'pkt-dstaddr': '10.10.10.11',
 'pkt-src-aws-service': 'AMAZON',
 'pkt-srcaddr': '52.52.52.152',
 'protocol': '6',
 'region': 'us-east-1',
 'srcaddr': '52.52.52.152',
 'srcport': '443',
 'start': '1661285124',
 'sublocation-id': '-',
 'sublocation-type': '-',
 'subnet-id': 'subnet-01eb23eb4fe5c6bd7',
 'tcp-flags': '19',
 'traffic-path': '-',
 'type': 'IPv4',
 'version': '5',
 'vpc-id': 'vpc-0123a456b789d',
 'src-tag-Name': 'test-traffic-ec2-1', 'src-tag-project': ‘Log Analytics’, 'src-tag-team': 'Engineering', 'dst-tag-Name': 'test-traffic-ec2-1', 'dst-tag-project': ‘Log Analytics’, 'dst-tag-team': 'Engineering', 'dst-vpc-id': 'vpc-0bf974690f763100d', 'dst-az-id': 'us-east-1a', 'dst-subnet-id': 'subnet-01eb23eb4fe5c6bd7', 'dst-interface-id': 'eni-01eb23eb4fe5c6bd7', 'dst-instance-id': 'i-06be6f86af0353293'}

Create an Athena database and AWS Glue crawler

Now that you have enriched the VPC flow logs and stored them in Amazon S3, the next step is to create the Athena database and table to query the data. You first create an AWS Glue crawler to infer the schema from the log files in Amazon S3.

  1. On the AWS Glue console, choose Crawlers in the navigation pane.
  2. Choose Create crawler.

Glue Crawler

  1. For Name¸ enter a name for the crawler.
  2. For Description, enter an optional description.
  3. Choose Next.

Glue Crawler properties

  1. Choose Add a data source.
  2. For Data source¸ choose S3.
  3. For S3 path, provide the path of the flow logs bucket.
  4. Select Crawl all sub-folders.
  5. Choose Add an S3 data source.

Add Data source

  1. Choose Next.

Data source classifiers

  1. Choose Create new IAM role.
  2. Enter a role name.
  3. Choose Next.

Configure security settings

  1. Choose Add database.
  2. For Name, enter a database name.
  3. For Description, enter an optional description.
  4. Choose Create database.

Create Database

  1. On the previous tab for the AWS Glue crawler setup, for Target database, choose the newly created database.
  2. Choose Next.

Set output and scheduling

  1. Review the configuration and choose Create crawler.

Create crawler

  1. On the Crawlers page, select the crawler you created and choose Run.

Run crawler

You can rerun this crawler when new tags are added to your AWS resources, so that they’re available for you to query from the Athena database.

Run Athena queries

Now you’re ready to query the enriched VPC flow logs from Athena.

  1. On the Athena console, open the query editor.
  2. For Database, choose the database you created.
  3. Enter the query as shown in the following screenshot and choose Run.

Athena query

The following code shows some of the sample queries you can run:

Select * from awslogs where "dst-az-id"='us-east-1a'
Select * from awslogs where "src-tag-project"='Log Analytics' or "dst-tag-team"='Engineering' 
Select "srcaddr", "srcport", "dstaddr", "dstport", "region", "az-id", "dst-az-id", "flow-direction" from awslogs where "az-id"='use1-az2' and "dst-az-id"='us-east-1a'

The following screenshot shows an example query result of the source Availability Zone to the destination Availability Zone traffic.

Athena query result

You can also visualize various charts for the flow logs stored in the S3 bucket via QuickSight. For more information, refer to Analyzing VPC Flow Logs using Amazon Athena, and Amazon QuickSight.

Pricing

For pricing details, refer to Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose pricing.

Clean up

To clean up your resources, complete the following steps:

  1. Delete the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream and associated IAM role and policies.
  2. Delete the target S3 bucket.
  3. Delete the VPC flow log subscription.
  4. Delete the Lambda function and associated IAM role and policy.

Conclusion

This post provided a complete serverless solution architecture for enriching VPC flow log records with additional information like resource tags using a Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream and Lambda function to process logs to enrich with metadata and store in a target S3 file. This solution can help you query, analyze, and visualize VPC flow logs with relevant application metadata because resource tags have been assigned to resources that are available in the logs. This meaningful information associated with each log record wherever the tags are available makes it easy to associate log information to your application.

We encourage you to follow the steps provided in this post to create a delivery stream, integrate with your VPC flow logs, and create a Lambda function to enrich the flow log records with additional metadata to more easily understand and analyze traffic patterns in your environment.


About the Authors

Chaitanya Shah is a Sr. Technical Account Manager with AWS, based out of New York. He has over 22 years of experience working with enterprise customers. He loves to code and actively contributes to AWS solutions labs to help customers solve complex problems. He provides guidance to AWS customers on best practices for their AWS Cloud migrations. He is also specialized in AWS data transfer and in the data and analytics domain.

Vaibhav Katkade is a Senior Product Manager in the Amazon VPC team. He is interested in areas of network security and cloud networking operations. Outside of work, he enjoys cooking and the outdoors.

Publish Amazon DevOps Guru Insights to Slack Channel

Post Syndicated from Chetan Makvana original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/publish-amazon-devops-guru-insights-to-slack-channel/

Customers using Amazon DevOps Guru often wants to publish operational insights to chat collaboration platforms, such as Slack and Amazon Chime. Amazon DevOps Guru offers a fully managed AIOps platform service that enables developers and operators to improve application availability and resolve operational issues faster. It minimizes manual effort by leveraging machine learning (ML) powered recommendations. DevOps Guru automatically detects operational insights, predicts impending resource exhaustion, details likely cause, and recommends remediation actions. For customers running critical applications, having access to these operational insights and real-time alerts are key aspects to improve their overall incident remediation processes and maintain operational excellence. Customers use chat collaboration platforms to monitor operational insights and respond to events, which reduces context switching between applications and provides opportunities to respond faster.

This post walks you through how to integrate DevOps Guru with Slack channel to receive notifications for new operational insights detected by DevOps Guru. It doesn’t talk about enabling Amazon DevOps Guru and generating operational insights. You can refer to Gaining operational insights with AIOps using Amazon DevOps Guru to know more about this.

Solution overview

Amazon DevOps Guru integrates with Amazon EventBridge to notify you of events relating to insights and corresponding insight updates. To receive operational insight notifications in Slack channels, you configure routing rules to determine where to send notifications and use pre-defined DevOps Guru patterns to only send notifications or trigger actions that match that pattern. You can select any of the following pre-defined patterns to filter events to trigger actions in a supported AWS resource. For this post, we will send events only for “New Insights Open”.

  • DevOps Guru New Insight Open
  • DevOps Guru New Anomaly Association
  • DevOps Guru Insight Severity Upgraded
  • DevOps Guru New Recommendation Created
  • DevOps Guru Insight Closed

When EventBridge receives an event from DevOps Guru, the event rule fires and the event notification is sent to Slack channel by using AWS Lambda or AWS Chatbot. Chatbot is easier to configure and deploy. However, if you want more customization, we have also written a Lambda function that allows additional formatting options.

Amazon EventBridge receives an event from Amazon DevOps Guru, and fires event rule. A rule matches incoming events and sends them to AWS Lambda or AWS Chatbot. With AWS Lambda, you write code to customize the message and send formatted message to the Slack channel. To receive event notifications in chat channels, you configure an SNS topic as a target in the Amazon EventBridge rule and then associate the topic with a chat channel in the AWS Chatbot console. AWS Chatbot then sends event to the configured Slack channel.

Figure 1: Amazon EventBridge Integration with Slack using AWS Lambda or AWS Chatbot

The goal of this tutorial is to show a technical walkthrough of integration of DevOps Guru with Slack using the following options:

  1. Publish using AWS Lambda
  2. Publish using AWS Chatbot

Prerequisites

For this walkthrough, you should have the following prerequisites:

Publish using AWS Lambda

In this tutorial, you will perform the following steps:

  • Create a Slack Webhook URL
  • Launch SAM template to deploy the solution
  • Test the solution

Create a Slack Webhook URL

This step configures Slack workflow and creates a Webhook URL used for API call. You will need to have access to add a new channel and app to your Slack Workspace.

  1. Create a new channel for events (i.e. devopsguru_events).
  2. Within Slack, click on your workspace name drop-down arrow in the upper left.
  3. Choose Tools > Workflow Builder.
  4. Click Create in the upper right-hand corner of the Workflow Builder and give your workflow a name.
  5. Click Next.
  6. Click Select next to Webhook.
  7. Click Add variable and add the following variables one at a time in the Key section. All data types will be text.
    • text
    • account
    • region
    • startTime
    • insightType
    • severity
    • description
    • insightUrl
    • numOfAnomalies
  1. When done, you should have 9 variables, double check them as they are case sensitive and will be referenced.
  2. Click Add Step.
  3. On the Add a workflow step window, click Add next to send a message.
  4. Under Send this message to select the channel you created in earlier step.
  5. In Message text, create the following.
Final message is with placeholder as corresponding variables created in Step #7

Figure 2: Message text configuration in Slack

  1. Click Save.
  2. Click Publish.
  3. For the deployment, we will need the Webhook URL. Copy it in the notepad.

Launch SAM template to deploy the solution

In this step, you will launch the SAM template. This template deploys an AWS Lambda function that is triggered by an Amazon EventBridge rule when Amazon DevOps Guru notifies event relating to “DevOps Guru New Insight Open”. It also deploys AWS Secret Manager, Amazon EventBridge Rule and required permission to invoke this specific function. The AWS Lambda function retrieves the Slack Webhook URL from AWS Secret Manager and posts a message to Slack using webhook API call.

  1. Create a new directory, navigate to that directory in a terminal and clone the GitHub repository using the below command.
  1. Change directory to the directory where you cloned the GitHub repository.
cd devops-guru-integration-with-slack
  1. From the command line, use AWS SAM to build the serverless application with its dependencies.
sam build
  1. From the command line, use AWS SAM to deploy the AWS resources for the pattern as specified in the template.yml file.
sam deploy --guided
  1. During the prompts.
    • enter a stack name.
    • enter the desired AWS Region.
    • enter the Secret name to store Slack Channel Webhook URL.
    • enter the Slack Channel Webhook URL that you copied in an earlier step.
    • allow SAM CLI to create IAM roles with the required permissions.

Once you have run sam deploy --guided mode once and saved arguments to a configuration file (samconfig.toml), you can use sam deploy in future to use these defaults.

Test the solution

  1. Follow this blog to enable DevOps Guru and generate operational insights.
  2. When DevOps Guru detects a new insight, it generates events in EventBridge. EventBridge then triggers Lambda that sends it to a Slack channel as below.
Slack channel shows message with details like Account, Region, Start Time, Insight Type, Severity, Description, Insight URL and Number of anomalies found.

Figure 3. Message published to Slack

Cleaning up

To avoid incurring future charges, delete the resources.

  1. Delete resources deployed from this blog.
  2. From the command line, use AWS SAM to delete the serverless application with its dependencies.
sam delete

Publish using AWS Chatbot

In this tutorial, you will perform the following steps:

  • Configure Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) and Amazon EventBridge using the AWS Command Line Interface (CLI)
  • Configure AWS Chatbot to a Slack workspace
  • Test the solution

Configure Amazon SNS and Amazon Eventbridge

We will now configure and deploy an SNS topic and an Eventbridge rule. This EventBridge rule will be triggered by DevOps Guru when “DevOps Guru New Insight Open” events are generated. The event will then be sent to the SNS topic which we will configure as a target for the Eventbridge rule.

  1. Using CLI, create an SNS topic running the following command in the CLI. Alternatively, you can configure and create an SNS topic in the AWS management console.
aws sns create-topic --name devops-guru-insights-chatbot-topic
  1. Save the SNS topic ARN that is generated in the CLI for a later step in this walkthrough.
  2. Now we will create the Eventbridge rule. Run the following command to create the Eventbridge rule. Alternatively, you can configure and create the rule in the AWS management console.
aws events put-rule --name "devops-guru-insights-chatbot-rule" -
-event-pattern "{\"source\":[\"aws.devops-guru\"],\"detail-type\":[\"DevOps
 Guru New Insight Open\"]}"
  1. We now want to add targets to the rule we just created. Use the ARN of the SNS topic we created in step one.
aws events put-targets --rule devops-guru-insights-chatbot-rule --targets "Id"="1","Arn"=""
  1. We now have created an SNS topic, and an Eventbridge rule to send “DevOps Guru New Insight Open” events to that SNS topic.

Create and Add AWS Chatbot to a Slack workspace

In this step, we will configure AWS Chatbot and our Slack channel to receive the SNS Notifications we configured in the previous step.

  1. Sign into the AWS management console and open AWS Chatbot at https://console.aws.amazon.com/Chatbot/.
  2. Under Configure a chat client, select Slack from the dropdown and click Configure Client.
  3. You will then need to give AWS Chatbot permission to access your workspace, click Allow.
AWS Chatbot is requesting permission to access the Slack workspace

Figure 4.  AWS Chatbot requesting permission

  1. Once configured, you’ll be redirected to the AWS management console. You’ll now want to click Configure new channel.
  2. Use the follow configurations for the setup of the Slack channel.
    • Configuration Name: aws-chatbot-devops-guru
    • Channel Type: Public or Private
      • If adding Chatbot to a private channel, you will need the Channel ID. One way you can get this is by going to your slack channel and copying the link, the last set of unique characters will be your Channel ID.
    • Channel Role: Create an IAM role using a template
    • Role name: awschatbot-devops-guru-role
    • Policy templates: Notification permissions
    • Guardrail Policies: AWS-Chatbot-NotificationsOnly-Policy-5f5dfd95-d198-49b0-8594-68d08aba8ba1
    • SNS Topics:
      • Region: us-east-1 (Select the region you created the SNS topic in)
      • Topics: devops-guru-insights-chatbot-topic
  1.  Click Configure.
  2.  You should now have your slack channel configured for AWS Chatbot.
  3. Finally, we just need to invite AWS Chatbot to our slack channel.
    • Type /invite in your slack channel and it will show different options.
    • Select Add apps to this channel and invite AWS Chatbot to the channel.
  1. Now your solution is fully integrated and ready for testing.

Test the solution

  1. Follow this blog to enable DevOps Guru and generate operational insights.
  2. When DevOps Guru detects a new insight, it generates events in EventBridge, it will send those events to SNS. AWS Chatbot receives the notification from SNS and publishes the notification to your slack channel.
Slack channel shows message with “DevOps Guru New Insight Open”

Figure 5. Message published to Slack

Cleaning up

To avoid incurring future charges, delete the resources.

  1. Delete resources deployed from this blog.
  2. When ready, delete the EventBridge rule, SNS topic, and channel configuration on Chatbot.

Conclusion

In this post, you learned how Amazon DevOps Guru integrates with Amazon EventBridge and publishes insights into Slack channel using AWS Lambda or AWS Chatbot. “Publish using AWS Lambda” option gives more flexibility to customize the message that you want to publish to Slack channel. Using “Publish using AWS Chabot”, you can add AWS Chatbot to your Slack channel in just a few clicks. However, the message is not customizable, unlike the first option. DevOps users can now monitor all reactive and proactive insights into Slack channels. This post talked about publishing new DevOps Guru insight to Slack. However, you can expand it to publish other events like new recommendations created, new anomaly associated, insight severity upgraded or insight closed.

About the authors:

Chetan Makvana

Chetan Makvana is a senior solutions architect working with global systems integrators at AWS. He works with AWS partners and customers to provide them with architectural guidance for building scalable architecture and execute strategies to drive adoption of AWS services. He is a technology enthusiast and a builder with a core area of interest on serverless and DevOps. Outside of work, he enjoys binge-watching, traveling and music.

Brendan Jenkins

Brendan Jenkins is a solutions architect working with new AWS customers coming to the cloud providing them with technical guidance and helping achieve their business goals. He has an area of interest around DevOps and Machine Learning technology. He enjoys building solutions for customers whenever he can in his spare time.

How to evaluate and use ECDSA certificates in AWS Certificate Manager

Post Syndicated from Zachary Miller original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-evaluate-and-use-ecdsa-certificates-in-aws-certificate-manager/

AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) is a managed service that enables you to provision, manage, and deploy public and private SSL/TLS certificates that you can use to securely encrypt network traffic. You can now use ACM to request Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) certificates and associate the certificates with AWS services like Application Load Balancer (ALB) or Amazon CloudFront. As a result, you get the benefit of managed renewal, where ACM can automatically renew ECDSA certificates before they expire. Previously, you could only request certificates with an RSA 2048 key algorithm from ACM. ECDSA certificates could be imported to ACM, but imported certificates cannot use managed renewal.

You can request both ECDSA P-256 and P-384 certificates from ACM. If you do not request an ECDSA certificate, ACM will issue an RSA 2048 certificate by default.

In this blog post, we will briefly examine the differences between RSA and ECDSA certificates, discuss some important considerations when evaluating which certificate type to use, and walk through how you can request an ECDSA certificate and associate it with an application load balancer in AWS.

Cryptographic certificates overview

TLS certificates are used to secure network communications and establish the identity of websites over the internet, as well as the identity of resources on private networks. Public certificates that you request through ACM are obtained from Amazon Trust Services, which is an Amazon managed public certificate authority (CA).

Private certificates are issued through certificate authorities, which you can create and manage by using AWS Private Certificate Authority (AWS Private CA).

Both public and private certificates can help customers identify resources on networks and secure communication between these resources. Public certificates identify resources on the public internet, whereas private certificates do the same for private networks. One key difference is that applications and browsers trust public certificates by default, but an administrator must explicitly configure applications and devices to trust private certificates.

RSA and ECDSA primer

RSA and ECDSA are two widely used public-key cryptographic algorithms—algorithms that use two different keys to encrypt and decrypt data. In the case of TLS, a public key is used to encrypt data, and a private key is used to decrypt data. Public key (or asymmetric key) algorithms are not as computationally efficient as symmetric key algorithms like AES. For this reason, public key algorithms like RSA and ECDSA are primarily used to exchange secrets between two parties initiating a TLS connection. These secrets are then used by both parties to decipher the same symmetric key that actually encrypts the data in transit.

RSA stands for Rivest, Shamir, and Adleman: the researchers who first publicly described this algorithm in 1977. The basic functionality of RSA relies on the idea that large prime numbers are very difficult to efficiently factor. ECDSA, or Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm, is based on certain unique mathematical properties of elliptic curves that make them very useful for cryptographic operations. The cryptographic utility of ECDSA comes from a concept called the discrete logarithm problem.

Considerations when choosing between RSA and ECDSA

What are the important differences between RSA and ECDSA certificates? When should you choose ECDSA certificates to encrypt network traffic? In this section, we’ll examine the security and performance considerations that help to determine whether ECDSA or RSA certificates are the best choice for your workload.

Security

In cryptography, security is measured as the computational work it takes to exhaust all possible values of a symmetric key in an ideal cipher. An ideal cipher is a theoretical algorithm that has no weaknesses, so you must try every possible key to discover which is the correct key. This is similar to the idea of “brute forcing” a password: trying every possible character combination to find the correct password.

Let’s imagine you have a 112-bit key ideal cipher, which means it would take 2112 tries to exhaust the key space—we would say this cipher has a 112-bit security strength. However, it is important to realize that security strength and key length are not always equal—meaning that an encryption key with a length of 112 bits will not always have a 112-bit security strength.

ECDSA provides higher security strength for lower computational cost. ECDSA P-256, for example, provides 128-bit security strength and is equivalent to an RSA 3072 key. Meanwhile, ECDSA P-384 provides 192-bit security strength, equivalent to the key associated with an RSA 7680 certificate. In other words, an ECDSA P-384 key would require 2192 tries to exhaust the key space.

The following table provides an in-depth comparison of the different security strengths for RSA key lengths and ECDSA curve types. Note that only RSA 2048 and ECDSA P-256 and P-384 are currently issued by ACM. However, ACM does support the import and usage of the other certificate types listed in the table. For more information, see Importing certificates into AWS Certificate Manager.

Security strength RSA key length ECDSA curve type
80-bit 1024 160
112-bit 2048 224
128-bit 3072 256
192-bit 7680 384
256-bit 15360 512

Performance

ECDSA provides a higher security strength (for a given key length) than RSA but does not add performance overhead. For example, ECDSA P-256 is as performant as RSA 2048 while providing security strength that is comparable to RSA 3072.

ECDSA certificates also have up to a 50% smaller certificate size when compared to RSA certificates, and are therefore more suitable to protect data-in-transit over low bandwidth or for applications with limited memory and storage, such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices.

Take a look at the following certificate examples; you can see the size difference between RSA and ECDSA certificates.

RSA 2048: ECDSA P-256 (EC_prime256v1):
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----

Consider a small IoT sensor device that tracks temperature in an office building. This device typically has very low storage capacity and compute power, so the smaller ECDSA certificate will be easier to process and store. In the case of an IoT device, you might not be able to store the entire RSA certificate chain on the device due to memory limitations and the larger size of RSA certificates. This can make it more difficult to validate the chain of trust for that certificate.

Using ECDSA, customers can take advantage of the smaller size of the certificates (and the certificate trust chain) and store the entire chain of trust on the IoT device itself, enabling the IoT device to more easily validate the certificate.

When should I use ECDSA certificates from ACM?

In general, you should consider using ECDSA certificates wherever possible, because they provide stronger security (for a given key length) compared to RSA, without impacting performance. You can also choose to issue ECDSA certificates from ACM to implement 128-bit or 192-bit TLS security, where previously you could request up to 112-bit security from ACM by using RSA 2048 certificates.

ECDSA certificates are strongly recommended for applications that need to securely send data over low-bandwidth connections, or when you are using IoT devices that might not have much memory or computational power to store and process the larger certificate sizes that RSA offers.

If your application is not ECDSA compatible, you will need to continue using RSA certificates. RSA 2048 remains the default certificate type issued by ACM, in order to prevent compatibility issues with legacy applications or with applications that do not support ECDSA certificate types. We will provide links to check if your application is compatible with ECDSA certificate types in the next section of this blog.

Getting started with ECDSA certificates

Modern browsers and operating systems are ECDSA compatible. That said, some custom applications might not be ECDSA compatible. You can check whether your calling application is ECDSA compatible by accessing the following links from your application:

ECDSA P-256

ECDSA P-384

When you access one of these links, you should see a message stating “Expected Status: good”. This indicates that the application is ECDSA compatible. See Figure 1 for an example of a successful result.

Figure 1: ECDSA application compatibility example

Figure 1: ECDSA application compatibility example

When you terminate your TLS traffic with ALB, you can work around compatibility concerns by binding both ECDSA and RSA certificates for a given domain. ALB will prioritize and present the ECDSA certificate when the calling application is ECDSA compatible and will use the RSA certificate if the calling application is not ECDSA compatible. We’ll walk through this configuration in the demonstration portion of this post.

How to request an ECDSA certificate from ACM

You can use the ACM console, APIs, or AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI) to issue public or private ECDSA P-256 and P-384 TLS certificates. When you request certificates by using the API or AWS CLI, you can use the request-certificate API action with either EC_prime256v1 or EC_secp384r1 as the key-algorithm parameter to request a P-256 or P-384 ECDSA certificate, respectively.

Certificates have a defined validity period, and ACM will attempt to renew certificates that were issued by ACM and that are in use before they expire. ACM will also attempt to automatically bind the renewed certificates with an integrated service. ACM issued private ECDSA certificates can also be exported and used on other workloads to terminate TLS traffic.

Associate an ECDSA certificate with an Application Load Balancer for TLS

To demonstrate how to request and use ECDSA certificates from ACM, let’s examine a common use case: requesting a public certificate from ACM and associating it with an ALB. This walkthrough will also include requesting an RSA 2048 certificate and associating it with the same ALB, to facilitate TLS connections for applications that do not support ECDSA. ALB will prioritize and present the ECDSA certificate when the calling application is ECDSA compatible, and will use the RSA certificate if the calling application is not ECDSA compatible.

This procedure has the following prerequisites:

  • An AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) user or role that has the appropriate permissions to request certificates from ACM and create an ALB
  • A public domain that you own
  • A public subnet, or IAM permissions to create one

To request an ECDSA certificate from ACM

  1. Navigate to the ACM console and choose Request a certificate.
  2. Choose Request a public certificate, and then choose Next.
  3. For Fully qualified domain name, enter your domain name.
  4. Choose DNS validation. DNS validation is recommended wherever possible, because it enables automatic renewal of ACM issued certificates with no action required by the domain owner. If you use Amazon Route 53, you can use ACM to directly update your DNS records. DNS-validated certificates will be renewed by ACM as long as the certificate is in use and the DNS record is in place.
    Figure 2: Requesting a public ECDSA certificate

    Figure 2: Requesting a public ECDSA certificate

  5. In the Key algorithm options section, select your preferred algorithm based on your security requirements:
    • ECDSA P-256 — Equivalent in security strength to RSA 3072
    • ECDSA P-384 — Equivalent in security strength to RSA 7680
    Figure 3: Key algorithms

    Figure 3: Key algorithms

  6. (Optional) Add tags to help you identify and manage your certificate. You can find more information on using tags in Tagging AWS resources in the AWS General Reference.
  7. Choose Request to request the public certificate.

    The certificate will now be in the Pending Validation state until the domain can be validated, either through DNS or email validation, depending on your selection in the previous steps. For information on how to validate ownership of the domain name or names, see Validating domain ownership in the AWS Certificate Manager User Guide.

  8. Take note of the certificate ARN; you will need this later to identify the certificate.

To request an RSA 2048 certificate from ACM

  1. To request a public RSA 2048 certificate, use the same steps noted in the preceding section, but select RSA 2048 in the Key algorithm options section.
  2. Make sure that both certificates you request have the same fully qualified domain name.

    For more information on requesting public certificates from ACM, see Requesting a public certificate.

To create a new Application Load Balancer and associate a default certificate

  1. Navigate to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) console. In the left navigation pane, under Load Balancing, choose Load Balancers.
  2. Choose Create Load Balancer.

    For this post, we will use an Application Load Balancer. You can view more details on each type of Load Balancer, and see a feature-to-feature breakdown, on the Elastic Load Balancing features page.

  3. For the Application Load Balancer type, choose Create.
  4. Enter a name for your load balancer.
  5. Select the scheme and IP address type of the application load balancer. For this post, we will choose Internet-facing for the scheme and use the IPv4 address type.
    Figure 4: Create an application load balancer

    Figure 4: Create an application load balancer

  6. In the Network mapping section of this page, you will need to select a VPC and at least two Availability Zones and one public subnet per zone. If you do not already have a public subnet in two Availability Zones, see these instructions for creating a public subnet.
    Figure 5: Network mapping for ALB

    Figure 5: Network mapping for ALB

  7. Next, you need to create a secure listener. Under Listeners and routing, choose the HTTPS protocol (Port 443) in the drop-down list.
  8. Under Default action, choose Forward. For Target Group, select a target group for the ALB to send traffic to.
  9. Under Secure listener settings, you will associate the RSA 2048 certificate with the new Application Load Balancer.

    Choose the appropriate security policy for your organization—you can compare policies on this page.

  10. Under Default SSL/TLS certificate, verify that From ACM is selected, and then in the drop-down list, select the RSA certificate you requested earlier.

    Note: We are using the RSA certificate as the default so that the ALB will use this certificate if the connecting client does not support ECDSA or the Server Name Indication (SNI) protocol. This is to maximize availability and compatibility with legacy applications.

    Figure 6: Secure listener settings

    Figure 6: Secure listener settings

  11. (Optional) Add tags to the Application Load Balancer.
  12. Review your selections, and then choose Create load balancer.
    Figure 7: Review and create load balancer

    Figure 7: Review and create load balancer

To associate the ECDSA certificate with the Application Load Balancer

  1. In the EC2 console, select the new ALB you just created, and choose the Listeners tab.
  2. In the SSL Certificate column, you should see the default certificate you added when you created the ALB. Choose View/edit certificates to see the full list of certificates associated with this ALB.
    Figure 8: ALB listeners

    Figure 8: ALB listeners

  3. Under Listener certificates for SNI, choose Add certificate.
    Figure 9: Listener certificates for SNI

    Figure 9: Listener certificates for SNI

  4. Under ACM and IAM certificates, select the ECDSA certificate you requested earlier.

    Note: You can use the certificate ARN to identify the appropriate certificate.

  5. Choose Include as pending below to add the ECDSA certificate to the listener.
    Figure 10: Adding the ECDSA certificate to the load balancer listener

    Figure 10: Adding the ECDSA certificate to the load balancer listener

  6. Under Listener certificates for SNI, confirm that the ECDSA certificate is listed as pending, and choose Add pending certificates.
    Figure 11: Confirm addition of pending certificates

    Figure 11: Confirm addition of pending certificates

Great! We’ve used ACM to request a public ECDSA certificate and a public RSA 2048 certificate. Next, we associated both of these certificates with an Application Load Balancer to facilitate TLS communications between the load balancer and client devices.

If clients support the SNI protocol, the ALB uses a smart certificate selection algorithm. The load balancer will select the best certificate that the client can support from the certificate list. Certificate selection is based on the following criteria, in the following order:

  • Public key algorithm (prefer ECDSA over RSA)
  • Hashing algorithm (prefer SHA over MD5)
  • Key length (prefer the longest key)
  • Validity period

In the earlier example, this means if clients support SNI and ECDSA, the ECDSA certificate will be prioritized and presented to the client. If the client does not support SNI or ECDSA, the RSA certificate will be used to maximize compatibility with legacy applications.

Conclusion

In this blog post, we discussed the basic differences between RSA and ECDSA certificates, when you might choose ECDSA over RSA, and how you can use AWS Certificate Manager to request public or private ECDSA certificates. We also covered how to request a public ECDSA certificate from ACM and associate it with an Application Load Balancer. Finally, we showed you how to request an RSA 2048 certificate and associate it with the same load balancer to facilitate TLS for applications that do not support ECDSA certificates.

To learn more about using ACM to issue ECDSA certificates, see our YouTube video: AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) – How to evaluate and use ECDSA certificates. You can also refer to the AWS Certificate Manager documentation for more details, and then get started issuing ECDSA certificates with AWS Certificate Manager.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.

Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.

Zach Miller

Zach Miller

Zach is a Senior Security Specialist Solutions Architect at AWS. His background is in data protection and security architecture, focused on a variety of security domains, including cryptography, secrets management, and data classification. Today, he is focused on helping enterprise AWS customers adopt and operationalize AWS security services to increase security effectiveness and reduce risk.

Chandan Kundapur

Chandan Kundapur

Chandan is a Senior Technical Product Manager on the AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) team. With over 15 years of cybersecurity experience, he has a passion for driving PKI product strategy.

Optimize your sending reputation and deliverability with SES dedicated IPs

Post Syndicated from Lauren Cudney original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/optimize-your-sending-reputation-and-deliverability-with-ses-dedicated-ips/

Optimize your sending reputation and deliverability with SES dedicated IPs

Email remains the best medium for communicating with customers, with a ROI of 4200%, higher than social media or blogs. Organizations that fail to adequately manage their email sending and reputation risk having their emails marked as spam, not reaching their customers’ inboxes, reducing trust with their customers and ultimately, losing revenue. Studies showed that 16% of all marketing emails have either gone completely missing or have been caught by popular spam filters. In this blog post we will explain the benefits of sending email over a dedicated IP, and how dedicated IPs (managed) makes it easy to do so.

Improve your sender reputation and deliverability with dedicated IPs
When customers sign up to SES, their sending is automatically sent from shared IPs. Shared IPs offer a cost-effective and safe method of sending email. A limitation of sending over a shared IP is that customers do not control their own sending reputations. The reputation of the IP that you send from is determined by the quality of content and engagement levels of all the emails sent from that IP. This means that good senders, that send highly engaged content or important transactional emails, cannot improve their sending reputation on shared IPs. By improving their sending reputation, senders can improve their deliverability rates and make sure that more of their emails get to to the recipient’s inbox rather than their junk folder. Today, this is avoided by customers sending via a dedicated IP. Dedicated IPs are exclusive to a single sender so other bad actors cannot affect their sending reputation and good senders can improve their sending reputation.

A common method organizations use to increase delivery rate is to lease dedicated IPs where they are the sole exclusive sender and do not share their IP with other senders. This helps grow and maintain sending reputation and build high levels of trust with ISPs and mailbox vendors, ensuring high delivery rates. Today however, there are a number of issues with sending email via dedicated IPs. Customers experience difficulties in estimating how many dedicated IPs they need to handle their sending volume. This means that customers often lease too many IPs and pay for bandwidth that they don’t need. Dedicated IPs must also be “warmed-up” by sending a gradually increasing amount of email each day via the IP so that the recipient ISPs and mailboxes do not see a sudden large burst of emails coming from it, which is a signal of spam and can result in a blocking. Customers must manually configure the amount of mail to increase by, often not reaching the required volume, on average, after 45 days, hampering their time-to-market agility. This burden of provisioning, configuring and managing dedicated IPs inhibits many email senders from adopting them, meaning that their sending reputation is not optimized.

Dedicated IPs (managed)
SES customers can now send their email via dedicated IPs (managed) and will have the entire process of provisioning, leasing, warming up and managing the IP fully automated. Dedicated IPs (managed) is a feature of SES that simplifies how SES customers setup and maintain email sending through a dedicated IP space. It builds on learnings and feedback gathered from customers using the current standard Dedicated IP offering.

Dedicated IPs (managed) provides the following key benefits:

  • Easy Onboarding – Customers can create a managed dedicated pool through the API/CLI/Console and start with dedicated sending, without having to open AWS support cases to lease/release individual IPs.
  • Auto-Scaling per ISP – No more manual monitoring or scaling of dedicated pools. The pool scales out and in automatically based on usage. This auto-scaling also takes into consideration ISPs specific policies. For example, if SES detects that an ISP supports a low daily send quota, the pool will scale-out to better distribute traffic to that ISP across more IPs. In the current offering, customers are responsible for right sizing the number of IPs in their sending pools.
  • Warmup per ISP – SES will track the warmup level for each IP in the pool toward each ISP individually. SES will also track domain reputation at the individual ISP level. If a customer has been sending all their traffic to Gmail, the IP is considered warmed up only for Gmail and cold for other ISPs. If the traffic pattern changes and customer ramps up their traffic to Hotmail, SES will ramp up traffic slowly for Hotmail as the IPs are not warmed up yet. In the current manual dedicated offering, warmup % is tracked at the aggregate IP level and therefore can’t track the individual ISP level of granularity.
  • Adaptive warmup – The warmup % calculation is adaptive and takes into account actual sending patterns at an ISP level. When the sending to an ISP drops, the warmup % also drops for the given ISP. Today, when warming up the IP, customers must specify a warm up schedule and choose their volumes. Rather than having to specify a schedule and guess the optimal volume to send, Dedicated IPs (managed) will adapt the sending volume based on each individual ISP’s capacity, optimizing the warm-up schedule
  • Spill-over into shared & defer – Messages will be accepted through the API/SMTP and the system will be deferring and retrying excess sending from a customer when it is above what the pool can safely support for a particular ISP. In the early phases of the pool, the system will still leverage spill-over into shared as is done in the current offering.

Onboarding

If you use several dedicated IP addresses with Amazon SES, you can create groups of those addresses. These groups are called dedicated IP pools. A common scenario is to create one pool of dedicated IP addresses for sending marketing communications, and another for sending transactional emails. Your sender reputation for transactional emails is then isolated from that of your marketing emails. In this scenario, if a marketing campaign generates a large number of complaints, the delivery of your transactional emails is not impacted.

Configuration sets are groups of rules that you can apply to your verified identities. A verified identity is a domain, subdomain, or email address you use to send email through Amazon SES. When you apply a configuration set to an email, all of the rules in that configuration set are applied to the email. For example, you can associate these dedicated IP pools with configuration sets and use one for sending marketing communications, and another for sending transactional emails.

Onboarding to a managed dedicated pool for the most part is very similar to onboarding to regular dedicated IP sending. It involves creating a dedicated on demand pool, associating the pool with a configuration set, and specifying the configuration set to use when sending email. The configuration set can be also applied implicitly to a sending identity by using the default configuration set feature.

Below are the instructions of how to get set up on dedicated IPs (managed)

Instructions

Console

Customer accounts allow-listed for the feature preview will be able to configure and view the relevant SES resources through the SES Console UI as well.

1. Go to the SES AWS console and click on Dedicated IPs
2. On the Dedicated IPs Screen, select the Dedicated IPs (managed) tab
3. Clink on the “Create dedicated on demand IP Pool” button
4. Enter the details of your new dedicated on demand pool. Specify Scaling Mode to be “OnDemand”. Do not associate it with a Configuration Set at this point. Click create.
5. Going back to the dedicated IP on demand pool view, you should see your newly created dedicated IPs (managed) pool in the “IP pools” table. If you have any existing standard dedicated pools, you can view them and their individual IPs under the “Standard dedicated IPs” tab.
6. View your current configuration sets.
7. Click on the “Create set” button.
8. Enter the details of your new configuration set. For Sending IP pool select your newly created dedicated on demand IP pool and click create.
9. View your verified sending identities and click on the identity you wish to onboard to dedicated sending.
10. Select the configuration tab. Under default configuration set, click on the Edit button.
11. Click on the “Assign a default configuration set” checkbox and select your newly created configuration set. Click save.
12. At this point all sending from that verified identity will automatically be sent using the dedicated on demandpool.

CLI

The dedicated on demand pool feature is currently in preview and not yet available through the public CLI. If you wish to configure or view your SES resources through the CLI, you can download and add an internal preview sesv2 model that contains the relevant API changes. A dedicated pool can be specified to be managed by setting the –scaling-mode MANAGED parameter when creating the dedicated pool.

wget https://tiny.amazon.com/qjdb5ewf/seses3amazemaidedijson -O "email-2019-09-27.dedicated-pool-managed.json"

aws configure add-model —service-model file://email-2019-09-27.dedicated-pool-managed.json —service-name sesv2-dedicated-managed

export AWS_DEFAULT_REGION=eu-central-1

# Create a managed dedicated pool
aws sesv2-dedicated-managed create-dedicated-ip-pool --pool-name dedicated1 --scaling-mode MANAGED

# Create a configuration set that that will send through the dedicated pool
aws sesv2-dedicated-managed create-configuration-set --configuration-set-name cs_dedicated1 --delivery-options SendingPoolName=dedicated1

# Configure the configuration set as the default for your sending identity
aws sesv2 put-email-identity-configuration-set-attributes --email-identity {{YOUR-SENDING-IDENTITY-HERE}} --configuration-set-name cs_dedicated1

# Send SES email through the API or SMTP without requiring any code changes. Emails will # be sent out through the dedicated pool.
aws ses send-email --destination ToAddresses={{DESTINATION-GOES-HERE}} --from {{YOUR-SENDING-IDENTITY-HERE}} --message "Subject={Data='Sending via managed ',Charset=UTF-8},Body={Text={Data=thebody,Charset=UTF-8}}"

Monitoring

We recommend customers onboard to event destinations [6] and delivery delay events [7] to more accurately track the sending performance of their dedicated sending.

Conclusion

In this blog post we explained the benefits of sending via a dedicated IP and the ease at which you can now do this using the new dedicated IPs (managed) feature.

For more information, please visit the below links:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/dedicated-ip.html 
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/dedicated-ip-pools.html 
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/managing-ip-pools.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/using-configuration-sets-in-email.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/managing-configuration-sets.html#default-config-sets
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/monitor-using-event-publishing.html
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2020/06/amazon-ses-can-now-send-notifications-when-the-delivery-of-an-email-is-delayed/
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/dedicated-ip-warming.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/dedicated-ip-warming.html#dedicated-ip-auto-warm-up
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/using-configuration-sets.html

https://dma.org.uk/uploads/misc/marketers-email-tracker-2019.pdf
https://www.emailtooltester.com/en/email-deliverability-test/

Use Amazon Inspector to manage your build and deploy pipelines for containerized applications

Post Syndicated from Scott Ward original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/use-amazon-inspector-to-manage-your-build-and-deploy-pipelines-for-containerized-applications/

Amazon Inspector is an automated vulnerability management service that continually scans Amazon Web Services (AWS) workloads for software vulnerabilities and unintended network exposure. Amazon Inspector currently supports vulnerability reporting for Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instances and container images stored in Amazon Elastic Container Registry (Amazon ECR).

With the emergence of Docker in 2013, container technology has quickly moved from the experimentation phase into a viable production tool. Many customers are using containers to modernize their existing applications or as the foundations for new applications or services that they build. In this blog post, we’ll explore the process that Amazon Inspector takes to scan container images. We’ll also show how you can integrate Amazon Inspector into your containerized application build and deployment pipeline, and control pipeline steps based on the results of an Amazon Inspector container image scan.

Solution overview and walkthrough

The solution outlined in this post covers a deployment pipeline modeled in AWS CodePipeline. The source for the pipeline is AWS CodeCommit, and the build of the container image is performed by AWS CodeBuild. The solution uses a collection of AWS Lambda functions and an Amazon DynamoDB table to evaluate the container image status and make an automated decision about deploying the container image. Finally, the pipeline has a deploy stage that will deploy the container image into an Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) cluster. In this section, I’ll outline the key components of the solution and how they work. In the following section, Deploy the solution, I’ll walk you through how to actually implement the solution.

Although this solution uses AWS continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) services such as CodePipeline and CodeBuild, you can also build similar capabilities by using third-party CI/CD solutions. In addition to CodeCommit, other third-party code repositories such as GitHub or Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) can be substituted in as a source for the pipeline.

Solution architecture

Figure 1 shows the high-level architecture of the solution, which integrates Amazon Inspector into a container build and deploy pipeline.

Figure 1: Overall container build and deploy architecture

Figure 1: Overall container build and deploy architecture

The high-level workflow is as follows:

  1. You commit the image definition to a CodeCommit repository.
  2. An Amazon EventBridge rule detects the repository commit and initiates the container pipeline.
  3. The source stage of the pipeline pulls the image definition and build instructions from the CodeCommit repository.
  4. The build stage of the pipeline creates the container image and stores the final image in Amazon ECR.
  5. The ContainerVulnerabilityAssessment stage sends out a request for approval by using an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic. A Lambda function associated with the topic stores the details about the container image and the active pipeline, which will be needed in order to send a response back to the pipeline stage.
  6. Amazon Inspector scans the Amazon ECR image for vulnerabilities.
  7. The Lambda function receives the Amazon Inspector scan summary message, through EventBridge, and makes a decision on allowing the image to be deployed. The function retrieves the pipeline approval details so that the approve or reject message is sent to the correct active pipeline stage.
  8. The Lambda function submits an Approved or Rejected status to the deployment pipeline.
  9. CodePipeline deploys the container image to an Amazon ECS cluster and completes the pipeline successfully if an approval is received. The pipeline status is set to Failed if the image is rejected.

Container image build stage

Let’s now review the build stage of the pipeline that is associated with the Amazon Inspector container solution. When a new commit is made to the CodeCommit repository, an EventBridge rule, which is configured to look for updates to the CodeCommit repository, initiates the CodePipeline source action. The source action then collects files from the source repository and makes them available to the rest of the pipeline stages. The pipeline then moves to the build stage.

In the build stage, CodeBuild extracts the Dockerfile that holds the container definition and the buildspec.yaml file that contains the overall build instructions. CodeBuild creates the final container image and then pushes the container image to the designated Amazon ECR repository. As part of the build, the image digest of the container image is stored as a variable in the build stage so that it can be used by later stages in the pipeline. Additionally, the build process writes the name of the container URI, and the name of the Amazon ECS task that the container should be associated with, to a file named imagedefinitions.json. This file is stored as an artifact of the build and will be referenced during the deploy phase of the pipeline.

Now that the image is stored in an Amazon ECR repository, Amazon Inspector scanning begins to check the image for vulnerabilities.

The details of the build stage are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The container build stage

Figure 2: The container build stage

Container image approval stage

After the build stage is completed, the ContainerVulnerabilityAssessment stage begins. This stage is lightweight and consists of one stage action that is focused on waiting for an Approved or Rejected message for the container image that was created in the build stage. The ContainerVulnerabilityAssessment stage is configured to send an approval request message to an SNS topic. As part of the approval request message, the container image digest, from the build stage, will be included in the comments section of the message. The image digest is needed so that approval for the correct container image can be submitted later. Figure 3 shows the comments section of the approval action where the container image digest is referenced.

Figure 3: Container image digest reference in approval action configuration

Figure 3: Container image digest reference in approval action configuration

The SNS topic that the pipeline approval message is sent to is configured to invoke a Lambda function. The purpose of this Lambda function is to pull key details from the SNS message. Details retrieved from the SNS message include the pipeline name and stage, stage approval token, and the container image digest. The pipeline name, stage, and approval token are needed so that an approved or rejected response can be sent to the correct pipeline. The container image digest is the unique identifier for the container image and is needed so that it can be associated with the correct active pipeline. This information is stored in a DynamoDB table so that it can be referenced later when the step that assesses the result of an Amazon Inspector scan submits an approved or rejected decision for the container image. Figure 4 illustrates the flow from the approval stage through storing the pipeline approval data in DynamoDB.

Figure 4: Flow to capture container image approval details

Figure 4: Flow to capture container image approval details

This approval action will remain in a pending status until it receives an Approved or Rejected message or the timeout limit of seven days is reached. The seven-day timeout for approvals is the default for CodePipeline and cannot be changed. If no response is received in seven days, the stage and pipeline will complete with a Failed status.

Amazon Inspector and container scanning

When the container image is pushed to Amazon ECR, Amazon Inspector scans it for vulnerabilities.

In order to show how you can use the findings from an Amazon Inspector container scan in a build and deploy pipeline, let’s first review the workflow that occurs when Amazon Inspector scans a container image located in Amazon ECR.

Figure 5: Image push, scan, and notification workflow

Figure 5: Image push, scan, and notification workflow

The workflow diagram in Figure 5 outlines the steps that happen after an image is pushed to Amazon ECR all the way to messaging that the image has been successfully scanned and what the final scan results are. The steps in this workflow are as follows:

  1. The final container image is pushed to Amazon ECR by an individual or as part of a build.
  2. Amazon ECR sends a message indicating that a new image has been pushed.
  3. The message about the new image is received by Amazon Inspector.
  4. Amazon Inspector pulls a copy of the container image from Amazon ECR and performs a vulnerability scan.
  5. When Amazon Inspector is done scanning the image, a message summarizing the severity of vulnerabilities that were identified during the container image scan is sent to Amazon EventBridge. You can create EventBridge rules that match the vulnerability summary message to route the message onto a target for notifications or to enable further action to be taken.

Here’s a sample EventBridge pattern that matches the scan summary message from Amazon Inspector.

{
  "detail-type": ["Inspector2 Scan"],
  "source": ["aws.inspector2"]
}

This entire workflow, from ingesting the initial image to sending out the status on the Amazon Inspector scan, is fully managed. You just focus on how you want to use the Amazon Inspector scan status message to govern the approval and deployment of your container image.

The following is a sample of what the Amazon Inspector vulnerability summary message looks like. Note, in bold, the container image Amazon Resource Name (ARN), image repository ARN, message detail type, image digest, and the vulnerability summary.

{
    "version": "0",
    "id": "bf67fc08-f522-f598-6946-8e7b372ba426",
    "detail-type": "Inspector2 Scan",
    "source": "aws.inspector2",
    "account": "<account id>",
    "time": "2022-05-25T16:08:17Z",
    "region": "us-east-2",
    "resources":
    [
        "arn:aws:ecr:us-east-2:<account id>:repository/vuln-images/vulhub/rsync"
    ],
    "detail":
    {
        "scan-status": "INITIAL_SCAN_COMPLETE",
        "repository-name": "arn:aws:ecr:us-east-2:<account id>:repository/vuln-images/vulhub/rsync",
        "finding-severity-counts": { "CRITICAL": 3, "HIGH": 16, "MEDIUM": 4, "TOTAL": 24 },
        "image-digest": "sha256:21ae0e3b7b7xxxx",
        "image-tags":
        [
            "latest"
        ]
    }
}

Processing Amazon Inspector scan results

After Amazon Inspector sends out the scan status event, a Lambda function receives and processes that event. This function needs to consume the Amazon Inspector scan status message and make a decision about whether the image can be deployed.

The eval_container_scan_results Lambda function serves two purposes: The first is to extract the findings from the Amazon Inspector scan message that invoked the Lambda function. The second is to evaluate the findings based on thresholds that are defined as parameters in the Lambda function definition. Based on the threshold evaluation, the container image will be flagged as either Approved or Rejected. Figure 6 shows examples of thresholds that are defined for different Amazon Inspector vulnerability severities, as part of the Lambda function.

Figure 6: Vulnerability thresholds defined in Lambda environment variables

Figure 6: Vulnerability thresholds defined in Lambda environment variables

Based on the container vulnerability image results, the Lambda function determines whether the image should be approved or rejected for deployment. The function will retrieve the details about the current pipeline that the image is associated with from the DynamoDB table that was populated by the image approval action in the pipeline. After the details about the pipeline are retrieved, an Approved or Rejected message is sent to the pipeline approval action. If the status is Approved, the pipeline continues to the deploy stage, which will deploy the container image into the defined environment for that pipeline stage. If the status is Rejected, the pipeline status is set to Rejected and the pipeline will end.

Figure 7 highlights the key steps that occur within the Lambda function that evaluates the Amazon Inspector scan status message.

Figure 7: Amazon Inspector scan results decision

Figure 7: Amazon Inspector scan results decision

Image deployment stage

If the container image is approved, the final image is deployed to an Amazon ECS cluster. The deploy stage of the pipeline is configured with Amazon ECS as the action provider. The deploy action contains the name of the Amazon ECS cluster and stage that the container image should be deployed to. The image definition file (imagedefinitions.json) that was created in the build stage is also listed in the deploy configuration. When the deploy stage runs, it will create a revision to the existing Amazon ECS task definition. This task definition contains the name of the Amazon ECR image that has been approved for deployment. The task definition is then deployed to the Amazon ECS cluster and service.

Deploy the solution

Now that you have an understanding of how the container pipeline solution works, you can deploy the solution to your own AWS account. This section will walk you through the steps to deploy the container approval pipeline, and show you how to verify that each of the key steps is working.

Step 1: Activate Amazon Inspector in your AWS account

The sample solution provided by this blog post requires that you activate Amazon Inspector in your AWS account. If this service is not activated in your account, learn more about the free trial and pricing for this service, and follow the steps in Getting started with Amazon Inspector to set up the service and start monitoring your account.

Step 2: Deploy the AWS CloudFormation template

For this next step, make sure you deploy the template within the AWS account and AWS Region where you want to test this solution.

To deploy the CloudFormation stack

  1. Choose the following Launch Stack button to launch a CloudFormation stack in your account. Use the AWS Management Console navigation bar to choose the region you want to deploy the stack in.

    Select this image to open a link that starts building the CloudFormation stack

  2. Review the stack name and the parameters for the template. The parameters are pre-populated with the necessary values, and there is no need to change them.
  3. Scroll to the bottom of the Quick create stack screen and select the checkbox next to I acknowledge that AWS CloudFormation might create IAM resources.
  4. Choose Create stack. The deployment of this CloudFormation stack will take 3–5 minutes.

After the CloudFormation stack has deployed successfully, you can proceed to reviewing and interacting with the deployed solution.

Step 3: Review the container pipeline and supporting resources

The CloudFormation stack is designed to deploy a collection of resources that will be used for an initial container build. When the CodePipeline resource is created, it will automatically pull the assets from the CodeCommit repository and start the pipeline for the container image.

To review the pipeline and resources

  1. In the CodePipeline console, navigate to the Region that the stack was deployed in.
  2. Choose the pipeline named ContainerBuildDeployPipeline to show the full pipeline details.
  3. Review the Source and Build stage, which will show a status of Succeeded.
  4. Review the ContainerVulnerabilityAssessment stage, which will show as failed with a Rejected status in the Manual Approval step.

    Figure 8 shows the full completed pipeline.

    Figure 8: Rejected container pipeline

    Figure 8: Rejected container pipeline

  5. Choose the Details link in the Manual Approval stage to reveal the reasons for the rejection. An example review summary is shown in Figure 9.
    Figure 9: Container pipeline approval rejection

    Figure 9: Container pipeline approval rejection

Review findings in Amazon Inspector (Optional)

You can use the Amazon Inspector console to see the full findings detail for this container image, if needed.

To view the findings in Amazon Inspector

  1. In the Amazon Inspector console, under Findings, choose By repository.
  2. From the list of repositories, choose the inspector-blog-images repository.
  3. Choose the Image tag link to bring up a list of the individual vulnerabilities that were found within the container image. Figure 10 shows an example of the vulnerabilities list in the findings details.
    Figure 10: Container image findings in Amazon Inspector

    Figure 10: Container image findings in Amazon Inspector

Step 4: Adjust the Amazon ECS desired count for the cluster service

Up to this point, you’ve deployed a pipeline to build and validate the container image, and you’ve seen an example of how the pipeline handles a container image that did not meet the defined vulnerability thresholds. Now you’ll deploy a new container image that will pass a vulnerability assessment and complete the pipeline.

The Amazon ECS service that the CloudFormation template deploys is initially created with the number of desired tasks set to 0. In order to allow the container pipeline to successfully deploy a container, you need to update the desired tasks value.

To adjust the task count in Amazon ECS (console)

  1. In the Amazon ECS console, choose the link for the cluster, in this case InspectorBlogCluster.
  2. On the Services tab, choose the link for the service named InspectorBlogService.
  3. Choose the Update button. On the Configure service page, set Number of tasks to 1.
  4. Choose Skip to review, and then choose Update Service.

To adjust the task count in Amazon ECS (AWS CLI)

Alternatively, you can run the following AWS CLI command to update the desired task count to 1. In order to run this command, you need the ARN of the Amazon ECS cluster, which you can retrieve from the Output tab of the CloudFormation stack that you created. You can run this command from the command line of an environment of your choosing, or by using AWS CloudShell. Make sure to replace <Cluster ARN> with your own value.

$ aws ecs update-service --cluster <Cluster ARN> --service InspectorBlogService --desired-count 1

Step 5: Build and deploy a new container image

Deploying a new container image will involve pushing an updated Dockerfile to the ContainerComponentsRepo repository in CodeCommit. With CodeCommit you can interact by using standard Git commands from a command line prompt, and there are multiple approaches that you can take to connect to the AWS CodeCommit repository from the command line. For this post, in order to simplify the interactions with CodeCommit, you will be shown how to add an updated file directly through the CodeCommit console.

To add an updated Dockerfile to CodeCommit

  1. In the CodeCommit console, choose the repository named ContainerComponentsRepo.
  2. In the screen listing the repository files, choose the Dockerfile file link and choose Edit.
  3. In the Edit a file form, overwrite the existing file contents with the following command:
    FROM public.ecr.aws/amazonlinux/amazonlinux:latest
  4. In the Commit changes to main section, fill in the following fields.
    1. Author name: your name
    2. Email address: your email
    3. Commit message: ‘Updated Dockerfile’

    Figure 11 shows what the completed form should look like.

    Figure 11: Complete CodeCommit entry for an updated Dockerfile

    Figure 11: Complete CodeCommit entry for an updated Dockerfile

  5. Choose Commit changes to save the new Dockerfile.

This update to the Dockerfile will immediately invoke a new instance of the container pipeline, where the updated container image will be pulled and evaluated by Amazon Inspector.

Step 6: Verify the container image approval and deployment

With a new pipeline initiated through the push of the updated Dockerfile, you can now review the overall pipeline to see that the container image was approved and deployed.

To see the full details in CodePipeline

  1. In the CodePipeline console, choose the container-build-deploy pipeline. You should see the container pipeline in an active status. In about five minutes, you should see the ContainerVulnerabilityAssessment stage move to completed with an Approved status, and the deploy stage should show a Succeeded status.
  2. To confirm that the final image was deployed to the Amazon ECS cluster, from the Deploy stage, choose Details. This will open a new browser tab for the Amazon ECS service.
  3. In the Amazon ECS console, choose the Tasks tab. You should see a task with Last status showing RUNNING. This is confirmation that the image was successfully approved and deployed through the container pipeline. Figure 12 shows where the task definition and status are located.
    Figure 12: Task status after deploying the container image

    Figure 12: Task status after deploying the container image

  4. Choose the task definition to bring up the latest task definition revision, which was created by the deploy stage of the container pipeline.
  5. Scroll down in the task definition screen to the Container definitions section. Note that the task is tied to the image you deployed, providing further verification that the approved container image was successfully deployed. Figure 13 shows where the container definition can be found and what you should expect to see.
    Figure 13: Container associated with revised task definition

    Figure 13: Container associated with revised task definition

Clean up the solution

When you’re finished deploying and testing the solution, use the following steps to remove the solution stack from your account.

To delete images from the Amazon ECR repository

  1. In the Amazon ECR console, navigate to the AWS account and Region where you deployed the solution.
  2. Choose the link for the repository named inspector-blog-images.
  3. Delete all of the images that are listed in the repository.

To delete objects in the CodePipeline artifact bucket

  1. In the Amazon S3 console in your AWS account, locate the bucket whose name starts with blog-base-setup-codepipelineartifactstorebucket.
  2. Delete the ContainerBuildDeploy folder that is in the bucket.

To delete the CloudFormation stack

  • In the CloudFormation console, delete the CloudFormation stack that was created to perform the steps in this post.

Conclusion

This post describes a solution that allows you to build your container images, have the images scanned for vulnerabilities by Amazon Inspector, and use the output from Amazon Inspector to determine whether the image should be allowed to be deployed into your environments.

This solution represents a pipeline with very simple build and deploy stages. Your pipeline will vary and may consist of multiple test stages and deployment stages for multiple environments. Additionally, the logic you use to determine whether a container image should be deployed may be different. The contents of this blog post are intended to help serve as a foundation that you can build on as you decide how to use Amazon Inspector for container vulnerability scanning. Feel free to use this guidance, and the example we provided, to extend the solution into your specific deployment pipeline.

 
If you have questions, contact AWS Support, or start a new thread on the AWS re:Post Amazon Inspector Forum. If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.

Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.

Scott Ward

Scott Ward

Scott is a Principal Solutions Architect with the External Security Services (ESS) product team and has been with Amazon for over 20 years. Scott provides technical guidance to customers on how to use security services to protect their AWS environments. Past roles included technical lead for the AWS security partner segment and member of the technical team for Amazon.com’s global financial systems.

Create a Multi-Region Python Package Publishing Pipeline with AWS CDK and CodePipeline

Post Syndicated from Brian Smitches original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/create-a-multi-region-python-package-publishing-pipeline-with-aws-cdk-and-codepipeline/

Customers can author and store internal software packages in AWS by leveraging the AWS CodeSuite (AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodeCommit, and AWS CodeArtifact).  As of the publish date of this blog post, there is no native way to replicate your CodeArtifact Packages across regions. This blog addresses how a custom solution built with the AWS Cloud Development Kit and AWS CodePipeline can create a Multi-Region Python Package Publishing Pipeline.

Whether it’s for resiliency or performance improvement, many customers want to deploy their applications across multiple regions. When applications are dependent on custom software packages, the software packages should be replicated to multiple regions as well. This post will walk through how to deploy a custom package publishing pipeline in your own AWS Account. This pipeline connects a Python package source code repository to build and publish pip packages to CodeArtifact Repositories spanning three regions (the primary and two replica regions). While this sample CDK Application is built specifically for pip packages, the underlying architecture can be reused for different software package formats, such as npm, Maven, NuGet, etc.

Solution overview

The following figure demonstrates the solution workflow:

  1. A CodePipeline pipeline orchestrates the building and publishing of the software package
    1. This pipeline is triggered by commits on the main branch of the CodeCommit repository
    2. A CodeBuild job builds the pip packages using twine to be distributed
    3. The publish stage (third column) uses three parallel CodeBuild jobs to publish the distribution package to the two CodeArtifact repositories in separate regions
  1. The first CodeArtifact Repository stores the package contents in the primary region.
  2. The second and third CodeArtifact Repository act as replicas and store the package contents in other regions.
Figure 1. A figure showing the architecture diagram

Figure 1.  Architecture diagram

All of these resources are defined in a single AWS CDK Application. The resources are defined in CDK Stacks that are deployed as AWS CloudFormation Stacks. AWS CDK can deploy the different stacks across separate regions.

Prerequisites

Before getting started, you will need the following:

  1. An AWS account
  2. An instance of the AWS Cloud9 IDE or an alternative local compute environment, such as your personal computer
  3. The following installed on your compute environment:
    1. AWS CDK
    2. AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI)
    3. npm
  1. The AWS Accounts must be bootstrapped for CDK in the necessary regions. The default configuration uses us-east-1, us-east-2 and us-west-2  as these three regions support CodeArtifact.

A new AWS Cloud9 IDE is recommended for this tutorial to isolate these actions in this post from your normal compute environment. See the Cloud9 Documentation for Creating an Environment.

Deploy the Python Package Publishing Pipeline into your AWS Account with the CDK

The source code can be found in this GitHub Repository.

  1. Fork the GitHub Repo into your account. This way you can experiment with changes as necessary to fit your workload.
  2. In your local compute environment, clone the GitHub Repository and cd into the project directory:
git clone [email protected]:<YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME>/multi-region-
python-package-publishing-pipeline.git && cd multi-region-
python-package-publishing-pipeline
  1. Install the necessary node packages:
npm i
  1. (Optional) Override the default configurations for the CodeArtifact domainName, repositoryName, primaryRegion, and replicaRegions.
    1. navigate to ./bin/multiregion_package_publishing.ts and update the relevant fields.
    2. From the project’s root directory (multi-region-python-package-publishing-pipeline), deploy the AWS CDK application. This step may take 5-10 minutes.
cdk deploy --all
  1. When prompted “Do you wish to deploy these changes (y/n)?”, Enter y.

Viewing the deployed CloudFormation stacks

After the deployment of the AWS CDK application completes, you can view the deployed AWS CDK Stacks via CloudFormation. From the AWS Console, search “CloudFormation’ in the search bar and navigate to the service dashboard. In the primary region (us-east-1(N. Virginia)) you should see two stacks: CodeArtifactPrimaryStack-<region> and PackagePublishingPipelineStack.

Screenshot showing the CloudFormation Stacks in the primary region

Figure 2. Screenshot showing the CloudFormation Stacks in the primary region

Switch regions to one of the secondary regions us-west-2 (Oregon) or us-east-2 (Ohio) to see the remaining stacks named CodeArtifactReplicaStack-<region>. These correspond to the three AWS CDK Stacks from the architecture diagram.

Screenshot showing the CloudFormation stacks in a separate region

Figure 3. Screenshot showing the CloudFormation stacks in a separate region

Viewing the CodePipeline Package Publishing Pipeline

From the Console, select the primary region (us-east-1) and navigate to CodePipeline by utilizing the search bar. Select the Pipeline titled packagePipeline and inspect the state of the pipeline. This pipeline triggers after every commit from the CodeCommit repository named PackageSourceCode. If the pipeline is still in process, then wait a few minutes, as this pipeline can take approximately 7–8 minutes to complete all three stages (Source, Build, and Publish). Once it’s complete, the pipeline should reflect the following screenshot:

A screenshot showing the CodePipeline flow

Figure 4. A screenshot showing the CodePipeline flow

Viewing the Published Package in the CodeArtifact Repository

To view the published artifacts, go to the primary or secondary region and navigate to the CodeArtifact dashboard by utilizing the search bar in the Console. You’ll see a repository named package-artifact-repo. Select the repository and you’ll see the sample pip package named mypippackage inside the repository. This package is defined by the source code in the CodeCommit repository named PackageSourceCode in the primary region (us-east-1).

Screenshot of the package repository

Figure 5. Screenshot of the package repository

Create a new package version in CodeCommit and monitor the pipeline release

Navigate to your CodeCommit’s PackageSourceCode (us-east-1 CodeCommit > Repositories > PackageSourceCode. Open the setup.py file and select the Edit button. Make a simple modification, change the version = '1.0.0' to version = '1.1.0' and commit the changes to the Main branch.

A screenshot of the source package's code repository in CodeCommit

Figure 6. A screenshot of the source package’s code repository in CodeCommit

Now navigate back to CodePipeline and watch as the pipeline performs the release automatically. When the pipeline finishes, this new package version will live in each of the three CodeArtifact Repositories.

Install the custom pip package to your local Python Environment

For your development team to connect to this CodeArtifact Repository to download repositories, you must configure the pip tool to look in this repository. From your Cloud9 IDE (or local development environment), let’s test the installation of this package for Python3:

  1. Copy the connection instructions for the pip tool. Navigate to the CodeArtifact repository of your choice and select View connection instructions
    1. Select Copy to copy the snippet to your clipboard
Screenshot showing directions to connect to a code artifact repository

Figure 7. Screenshot showing directions to connect to a code artifact repository

  1. Paste the command from your clipboard
  2. Run pip install mypippackage==1.0.0
Screenshot showing CodeArtifact login

Figure 8. Screenshot showing CodeArtifact login

  1. Test the package works as expected by importing the modules
  2. Start the Python REPL by running python3 in the terminal
Screenshot of the package being imported

Figure 9. Screenshot of the package being imported

Clean up

Destroy all of the AWS CDK Stacks by running cdk destroy --all from the root AWS CDK application directory.

Conclusion

In this post, we walked through how to deploy a CodePipeline pipeline to automate the publishing of Python packages to multiple CodeArtifact repositories in separate regions. Leveraging the AWS CDK simplifies the maintenance and configuration of this multi-region solution by using Infrastructure as Code and predefined Constructs. If you would like to customize this solution to better fit your needs, please read more about the AWS CDK and AWS Developer Tools. Some links we suggest include the CodeArtifact User Guide (with sections covering npm, Python, Maven, and NuGet), the CDK API Reference, CDK Pipelines, and the CodePipeline User Guide.

About the authors:

Andrew Chen

Andrew Chen is a Solutions Architect with an interest in Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and DevOps. Andrew has previous experience in management consulting in which he worked as a technical architect for various cloud migration projects. In his free time, Andrew enjoys fishing, hiking, kayaking, and keeping up with financial markets.

Brian Smitches

Brian Smitches is a Solutions Architect with an interest in Infrastructure as Code and the AWS Cloud Development Kit. Brian currently supports Federal SMB Partners and has previous experience with Full Stack Application Development. In his personal time, Brian enjoys skiing, water sports, and traveling with friends and family.

How to control non-HTTP and non-HTTPS traffic to a DNS domain with AWS Network Firewall and AWS Lambda

Post Syndicated from Tyler Applebaum original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-control-non-http-and-non-https-traffic-to-a-dns-domain-with-aws-network-firewall-and-aws-lambda/

Security and network administrators can control outbound access from a virtual private cloud (VPC) to specific destinations by using a service like AWS Network Firewall. You can use stateful rule groups to control outbound access to domains for HTTP and HTTPS by default in Network Firewall. In this post, we’ll walk you through how to accomplish this access control for non-HTTP and non-HTTPS traffic, such as SSH (Secure Shell). This solution is extensible to other protocols with static port assignments.

In the example scenario in this post, the network administrator needs to permit outbound SSH access on port 22/tcp to a third-party domain, example.org, from a group of Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instances that sits inside of a protected VPC that restricts outbound SSH traffic with Network Firewall. Non-HTTP traffic can’t currently be controlled with a domain rule in Network Firewall.

This solution allows administrators to control outbound access to a given domain in a granular way, by resolving the domain name inside of an AWS Lambda function, and updating a Network Firewall rule variable with the results of the DNS query. This solution further restricts specific non-HTTP and non-HTTPS traffic to those allowed domains to only what is explicitly specified by the administrator.

Solution overview

Figure 1 provides an overview of the solution and the resulting traffic flow.

Figure 1: Overview of the solution and the resulting traffic flow

Figure 1: Overview of the solution and the resulting traffic flow

The solution workflow is as follows:

  1. An Amazon EventBridge rule invokes the Lambda function every 10 minutes. You can modify this frequency to meet your needs. You should consider the time-to-live (TTL) record of the DNS record that you are configuring when choosing this interval.
  2. The Lambda function performs the DNS lookup for the provided domain, and updates a variable in an existing Network Firewall rule group. The rule group changes take a few seconds to fully apply to the nodes in your Network Firewall deployment.
  3. The newly created Network Firewall rule group is associated with the Network Firewall policy to control traffic.
  4. Traffic from the instances in your VPC flows through the Network Firewall endpoint, and if allowed, is routed through an internet gateway to the target server.

Prerequisites

This solution has the following prerequisites:

  1. An AWS account. If you don’t have an AWS account, create and activate one.
  2. An existing VPC with default routing to an internet gateway through a network firewall that has a firewall policy attached to it. The example rule included in the solution’s AWS CloudFormation template expects the firewall policy to use the default action order for stateful rule groups. If you don’t have an existing network firewall associated with your VPC, see the AWS Network Firewall Developer Guide to get started. For a walkthrough of the Network Firewall configuration and rules engine, see the blog post Hands-on walkthrough of the AWS Network Firewall flexible rules engine – Part 1.
  3. A DNS domain that you provide, which allows traffic for the protocol and port (or ports) that you plan to allow traffic to. This DNS domain needs to resolve to an IPv4 address or set of addresses; IPv6 is not supported, at this point.

Deploy the solution

We’ve provided a CloudFormation template to deploy this solution, which is located in the GitHub repository that accompanies this blog post.

To deploy the solution

  1. Download the CloudFormation template from our GitHub repository.
  2. Sign in to your AWS account and select the AWS Region where your Network Firewall is deployed.
  3. Navigate to the CloudFormation service.
  4. Choose Stacks > Create Stack > With new resources (standard).
  5. In the Specify template section, choose Upload a template file.
  6. Choose Choose file, navigate to where you saved the CloudFormation template, and upload it. Then choose Next.
  7. Specify a stack name for your CloudFormation stack.
  8. In the Parameters section, for the Domain parameter, specify the name of the domain to which you will control access. The default value is set to example.org; however, note that the actual example.org doesn’t allow SSH traffic.
  9. The remaining parameters have defaults to allow outbound SSH traffic to the specified domain. Adjust the LambdaJobFrequency variable so that it corresponds with the TTL of the DNS record that it will resolve. This allows the Lambda function to keep the IP address of the DNS record up to date, in the event that it changes. After you’ve configured the parameters, choose Next.
    Figure 2: CloudFormation stack parameters

    Figure 2: CloudFormation stack parameters

  10. On the Configure stack options page, specify any further options needed or keep the default options, and then choose Next.
  11. On the Review page, review the stack and parameters and select the check box to acknowledge that this template will create IAM resources. Choose Create Stack.
  12. Check the stack creation status. Upon successful completion, the status shows CREATE_COMPLETE.
    Figure 3: The successful creation of the CloudFormation stack

    Figure 3: The successful creation of the CloudFormation stack

Test the solution

Before you test the newly created rule, make sure that the Lambda function has been invoked at least once from the EventBridge rule.

To verify the Lambda function results

  1. In the AWS Management Console, navigate to the Lambda function Network-Firewall-Resolver-Function, and on the Monitor tab, choose View logs in CloudWatch.
    Figure 4: Navigating to view logs in CloudWatch

    Figure 4: Navigating to view logs in CloudWatch

  2. Select the most recent log stream.
  3. Verify that that a log line contains the entry StatefulRuleGroup updated successfully.
    Figure 5: Examining the CloudWatch logs to verify that the Lambda function ran successfully

    Figure 5: Examining the CloudWatch logs to verify that the Lambda function ran successfully

  4. Associate the stateful rule group that was created by the stack, Lambda-Managed-Stateful-Rule with the existing Network Firewall policy that is attached to your VPC. To do this:
    1. Navigate to VPC > Network Firewall > Firewall Policies and select your existing firewall policy.
    2. In the Stateful rule groups section, for Actions, choose Add unmanaged stateful rule groups.
  5. Select the check box for Lambda-Managed-Stateful-Rule, and then choose Add stateful rule group.
  6. When the newly provisioned Lambda function runs successfully, it will resolve the IPv4 address for the domain (example.org) and associate the address with the stateful rule variable IP_NET. To validate that this has happened, do the following:
    1. Navigate to VPC > Network Firewall > Network Firewall rule groups.
    2. Choose the Lambda-Managed-Stateful-Rule rule group.
    3. Navigate to the rule variable section, and choose IP_NET. If the Lambda function successfully resolved the provided domain name, the variable will contain the IPv4 addresses for the domain you provided, as shown in Figure 6.
      Figure 6: Validating the rule variable details

      Figure 6: Validating the rule variable details

  7. Test the rule by attempting to connect to the domain that you specified in the CloudFormation template. Use an EC2 instance within the VPC that the network firewall rule is associated with, and attempt to establish an SSH connection to the domain that you specified. As shown by the SSH key negotiation in Figure 7, traffic is allowed through the network firewall, as intended.
    Figure 7: SSH connectivity to the domain was successful

    Figure 7: SSH connectivity to the domain was successful

    You can also configure the rule to drop the SSH connection, rather than permit it. To do this:

    1. Navigate to VPC > Network Firewall > Network Firewall rule groups.
    2. Choose the Lambda-Managed-Stateful-Rule rule group. In the Rules section, choose Edit Rules.
    3. Modify the rule to take the Drop action, and save the rule group.

    As shown by the lack of response from the host in Figure 8, the SSH connection cannot be established anymore.

    Figure 8: An SSH connection cannot be established, due to the connection timing out

    Figure 8: An SSH connection cannot be established, due to the connection timing out

Cleanup

Follow the steps in this section to remove the resources created by this solution.

To remove the resources

  1. Sign in to your AWS account where you deployed the CloudFormation stack and navigate to the Network Firewall console.
  2. In the Stateful rule groups section, select the check box for Lambda-Managed-Stateful-Rule. For Actions, choose Disassociate from policy.
    Figure 9: Disassociating the stateful rule from the existing policy

    Figure 9: Disassociating the stateful rule from the existing policy

  3. Navigate to the CloudFormation console, select the stack that you created, and then choose Delete. Upon successful deletion, the resources created by the stack will be deleted.

Conclusion

In this post, we’ve demonstrated how security and network administrators have the ability to permit or restrict non-HTTP and non-HTTPS traffic to a given domain by using Network Firewall. With this solution, administrators can enforce granular port- and protocol-level control to third-party domains. To learn more about rule group configuration in AWS Network Firewall, see Managing your own rule groups in the Developer Guide.

 
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support. You can also start a new thread on AWS Network Firewall re:Post to get answers from the community.

Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.

Tyler Applebaum

Tyler Applebaum

Tyler is a Sr. Solutions Architect in the Charlotte, NC area helping customers migrate to AWS and modernize their applications. He has previous experience as a network engineer working in healthcare and finance.

Bhavin Lakhani

Bhavin is a Technical Account Manager in the US West, Northern California, helping customers with their AWS Enterprise Support, Operational, and Architectural needs. He has cloud infrastructure and database platform leadership experience in his previous roles. He loves soccer and is an ardent “Arsenal” fan.

Microservice observability with Amazon OpenSearch Service part 2: Create an operational panel and incident report

Post Syndicated from Marvin Gersho original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/microservice-observability-with-amazon-opensearch-service-part-2-create-an-operational-panel-and-incident-report/

In the first post in our series , we discussed setting up a microservice observability architecture and application troubleshooting steps using log and trace correlation with Amazon OpenSearch Service. In this post, we discuss using PPL to create visualizations in operational panels, and creating a simple incident report using notebooks.

To try out the solution yourself, start from part 1 of the series.

Microservice observability with Amazon OpenSearch Service

Piped Processing Language (PPL)

PPL is a new query language for OpenSearch. It’s simpler and more straightforward to use than query DSL (Domain Specific Language), and a better fit for DevOps than ODFE SQL. PPL handles semi-structured data and uses a sequence of commands delimited by pipes (|). For more information about PPL, refer to Using pipes to explore, discover and find data in Amazon OpenSearch Service with Piped Processing Language.

The following PPL query retrieves the same record as our search on the Discover page in our previous post. If you’re following along, use your trace ID in place of <Trace-ID>:

source = sample_app_logs | where stream = 'stderr' and locate(‘<Trace-ID>’,`log`) > 0

The query has the following components:

  • | separates commands in the statement.
  • Source=sample_app_logs means that we’re searching sample_app_logs.
  • where stream = ‘stderr’, stream is a field in sample_app_logs. We’re matching the value to stderr.
  • The locate function allows us to search for a string in a field. For our query, we search for the trace_id in the log field. The locate function returns 0 if the string is not found, otherwise the character number where it is found. We’re testing that trace_id is in the log field. This lets us find the entry that has the payment trace_id with the error.

Note that log is PPL keyword, but also a field in our log file. We put backquotes around a field name if it’s also a keyword if we need to reference it in a PPL statement.

To start using PPL, complete the following steps:

  1. On OpenSearch Dashboards, choose Observability in the navigation pane.
  2. Choose Event analytics.
  3. Choose the calendar icon, then choose the time period you want for your query (for this post, Year to date).
  4. Enter your PPL statement.

Note that results are shown in table format by default, but you can also choose to view them in JSON format.

Monitor your services using visualizations

We can use the PPL on the Event analytics page to create real-time visualizations. We now use these visualizations to create a dashboard for real-time monitoring of our microservices on the Operational panels page.

Event analytics has two modes: events and visualizations. With events, we’re looking at the query results as a table or JSON. With visualizations, the results are shown as a graph. For this post, we create a PPL query that monitors a value over time, and see the results in a graph. We can then save the graph to use in our dashboard. See the following code:

source = sample_app_logs | where stream = 'stderr' and locate('payment',`log`) > 0 | stats count() by span(time, 5m)

This code is similar to the PPL we used earlier, with two key differences:

  • We specify the name of our service in the log field (for this post, payment).
  • We use the aggregation function stats count() by span(time, 5m). We take the count of matches in the log field and aggregate by 5-minute intervals.

The following screenshot shows the visualization.

OpenSearch Service offers a choice of several different visualizations, such as line, bar, and pie charts.

We now save the results as a visualization, giving it the name Payment Service Errors.

We want to create and save a visualization for each of the five services. To create a new visualization, choose Add new, then modify the query by changing the service name.

We save this one and repeat the process by choosing Add new again for each of the five micro-services. Each microservice is now available on its own tab.

Create an operational panel

Operational panels in OpenSearch Dashboards are collections of visualizations created using PPL queries. Now that we have created the visualizations in the Event analytics dashboard, we can create a new operational panel.

  1. On the Operational panel page, choose Create panel.
  2. For Name, enter e-Commerce Error Monitoring.
  3. Open that panel and choose Add Visualization.
  4. Choose Payment Service Errors.

The following screenshot shows our visualization.

We now repeat the process for our other four services. However, the layout isn’t good. The graphs are too big, and laid out vertically, so they can’t all be seen at once.

We can choose Edit to adjust the size of each visualization and move them around. We end up with the layout in the following screenshot.

We can now monitor errors over time for all of our services. Notice that the y axis of each service visualization adjusts based on the error count.

This will be a useful tool for monitoring our services in the future.

Next, we create an incident report on the error that we found.

Create an OpenSearch incident report

The e-Commerce Error Monitoring panel can help us monitor our application in the future. However, we want to send out an incident report to our developers about our current findings. We do this by using OpenSearch PPL and Notebooks features introduced in OpenSearch Service 1.3 to create an incident report. A notebook can be downloaded as a PDF. An incident report is useful to share our findings with others.

First, we need to create a new notebook.

  1. Under Observability in the navigation pane, choose Notebooks.
  2. Choose Create notebook.
  3. For Name, enter e-Commerce Error Report.
  4. Choose Create.

    The following screenshot shows our new notebook page.

    A notebook consists of code blocks: narrative, PPL, and SQL, and visualizations created on the Event analytics page with PPL.
  5. Choose Add code block.
    We can now write a new code block.

    We can use %md, %sql, or %ppl to add code. In this first block, we just enter text.
  6. Use %md to add narrative text.
  7. Choose Run to see the output.

    The following screenshot shows our code block.

    Now we want to add our PPL query to show the error we found earlier.
  8. On the Add paragraph menu, choose Code block.
  9. Enter our PPL query, then choose Run.

    The following screenshot shows our output.

    Let’s drill down on the log field to get details of the error.
    We could have many narrative and code blocks, as well as visualizations of PPL queries. Let’s add a visualization.
  10. On the Add paragraph menu, choose Visualization.
  11. Choose Payment Service Errors to view the report we created earlier.

    This visualization shows a pattern of payment service errors this afternoon. Note that we chose a date range because we’re focusing on today’s errors to communicate with the development team.

    Notebook visualizations can be refreshed to provide updated information. The following screenshot shows our visualization an hour later.
    We’re now going to take our completed notebook and export it as a PDF report to share with other teams.
  12. Choose Output only to make the view cleaner to share.
  13. On the Reporting actions menu, choose Download PDF.

We can send this PDF report to the developers supporting the payment service.

Summary

In this post, we used OpenSearch Service v1.3 to create a dashboard to monitor errors in our microservices application. We then created a notebook to use a PPL query on a specific trace ID for a payment service error to provide details, and a graph of payment service errors to visualize the pattern of errors. Finally, we saved our notebook as a PDF to share with the payment service development team. If you would like to explore these features further check out the latest Amazon OpenSearch Observability documentation or, for open source, OpenSearch Observability latest open source documentation. You can also contact your AWS Solutions Architects, who can be of assistance alongside your innovation journey.


About the Authors

Marvin Gersho is a Senior Solutions Architect at AWS based in New York City. He works with a wide range of startup customers. He previously worked for many years in engineering leadership and hands-on application development, and now focuses on helping customers architect secure and scalable workloads on AWS with a minimum of operational overhead. In his free time, Marvin enjoys cycling and strategy board games.

Subham Rakshit is a Streaming Specialist Solutions Architect for Analytics at AWS based in the UK. He works with customers to design and build search and streaming data platforms that help them achieve their business objective. Outside of work, he enjoys spending time solving jigsaw puzzles with his daughter.

Rafael Gumiero is a Senior Analytics Specialist Solutions Architect at AWS. An open-source and distributed systems enthusiast, he provides guidance to customers who develop their solutions with AWS Analytics services, helping them optimize the value of their solutions.

Export historical Security Hub findings to an S3 bucket to enable complex analytics

Post Syndicated from Jonathan Nguyen original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/export-historical-security-hub-findings-to-an-s3-bucket-to-enable-complex-analytics/

AWS Security Hub is a cloud security posture management service that you can use to perform security best practice checks, aggregate alerts, and automate remediation. Security Hub has out-of-the-box integrations with many AWS services and over 60 partner products. Security Hub centralizes findings across your AWS accounts and supported AWS Regions into a single delegated administrator account in your aggregation Region of choice, creating a single pane of glass to consolidate and view individual security findings.

Because there are a large number of possible integrations across accounts and Regions, your delegated administrator account in the aggregation Region might have hundreds of thousands of Security Hub findings. To perform complex analytics or machine learning across the existing (historical) findings that are maintained in Security Hub, you can export findings to an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket. To export new findings that have recently been created, you can implement the solution in the aws-security-hub-findings-export GitHub repository. However, Security Hub has data export API rate quotas, which can make exporting a large number of findings challenging.

In this blog post, we provide an example solution to export your historical Security Hub findings to an S3 bucket in your account, even if you have a large number of findings. We walk you through the components of the solution and show you how to use the solution after deployment.

Prerequisites

To deploy the solution, complete the following prerequisites:

  1. Enable Security Hub.
  2. If you want to export Security Hub findings for multiple accounts, designate a Security Hub administrator account.
  3. If you want to export Security Hub findings across multiple Regions, enable cross-Region aggregation.

Solution overview and architecture

In this solution, you use the following AWS services and features:

  • Security Hub export orchestration
    • AWS Step Functions helps you orchestrate automation and long-running jobs, which are integral to this solution. You need the ability to run a workflow for hours due to the Security Hub API rate limits and number of findings and objects.
    • AWS Lambda functions handle the logic for exporting and storing findings in an efficient and cost-effective manner. You can customize Lambda functions to most use cases.
  • Storage of exported findings
  • Job status tracking
    • Amazon EventBridge tracks changes in the status of the Step Functions workflow. The solution can run for over 100 hours; by using EventBridge, you don’t have to manually check the status.
    • Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) sends you notifications when the long-running jobs are complete or when they might have issues.
    • AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store provides a quick way to track overall status by maintaining a numeric count of successfully exported findings that you can compare with the number of findings shown in the Security Hub dashboard.

Figure 1 shows the architecture for the solution, deployed in the Security Hub delegated administrator account in the aggregation Region. The figure shows multiple Security Hub member accounts to illustrate how you can export findings for an entire AWS Organizations organization from a single delegated administrator account.

Figure 1: High-level overview of process and resources deployed in the Security Hub account

Figure 1: High-level overview of process and resources deployed in the Security Hub account

As shown in Figure 1, the workflow after deployment is as follows:

  1. The Step Functions workflow for the Security Hub export is invoked.
  2. The Step Functions workflow invokes a single Lambda function that does the following:
    1. Retrieves Security Hub findings that have an Active status and puts them in a temporary file.
    2. Pushes the file as an object to Amazon S3.
    3. Adds the global count of exported findings from the Step Functions workflow to a Systems Manager parameter for validation and tracking purposes.
    4. Repeats steps b–c for about 10 minutes to get the most findings while preventing the Lambda function from timing out.
    5. If a nextToken is present, pushes the nextToken to the output of the Step Functions.

      Note: If the number of items in the output is smaller than the number of items returned by the API call, then the return output includes a nextToken, which can be passed to a subsequent command to retrieve the next set of items.

  3. The Step Functions workflow goes through a Choice state as follows:
    • If a Security Hub nextToken is present, Step Functions invokes the Lambda function again.
    • If a Security Hub nextToken isn’t present, Step Functions ends the workflow successfully.
  4. An EventBridge rule tracks changes in the status of the Step Functions workflow and sends events to an SNS topic. Subscribers to the SNS topic receive a notification when the status of the Step Functions workflow changes.

Deploy the solution

You can deploy the solution through either the AWS Management Console or the AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK).

To deploy the solution (console)

  • In your delegated administrator Security Hub account, launch the AWS CloudFormation template by choosing the following Launch Stack button. It will take about 10 minutes for the CloudFormation stack to complete.

    Launch Stack

    Note: The stack will launch in the US East (N. Virginia) Region (us-east-1). If you are using cross-Region aggregation, deploy the solution into the Region where Security Hub findings are consolidated. You can download the CloudFormation template for the solution, modify it, and deploy it to your selected Region.

To deploy the solution (AWS CDK)

  1. Download the code from our aws-security-hub-findings-historical-export GitHub repository, where you can also contribute to the sample code. The CDK initializes your environment and uploads the Lambda assets to Amazon S3. Then, you deploy the solution to your account.
  2. While you are authenticated in the security tooling account, run the following commands in your terminal. Make sure to replace <AWS_ACCOUNT> with the account number, and replace <REGION> with the AWS Region where you want to deploy the solution.
    cdk bootstrap aws://<AWS_ACCOUNT>/<REGION>
    cdk deploy SechubHistoricalPullStack

Solution walkthrough and validation

Now that you’ve successfully deployed the solution, you can see each aspect of the automation workflow in action.

Before you start the workflow, you need to subscribe to the SNS topic so that you’re notified of status changes within the Step Functions workflow. For this example, you will use email notification.

To subscribe to the SNS topic

  1. Open the Amazon SNS console.
  2. Go to Topics and choose the Security_Hub_Export_Status topic.
  3. Choose Create subscription.
  4. For Protocol, choose Email.
  5. For Endpoint, enter the email address where you want to receive notifications.
  6. Choose Create subscription.
  7. After you create the subscription, go to your email and confirm the subscription.

You’re now subscribed to the SNS topic, so any time that the Step Functions status changes, you will receive a notification. Let’s walk through how to run the export solution.

To run the export solution

  1. Open the Amazon Step Functions console.
  2. In the left navigation pane, choose State machines.
  3. Choose the new state machine named sec_hub_finding_export.
  4. Choose Start execution.
  5. On the Start execution page, for Name – optional and Input – optional, leave the default values and then choose Start execution.
    Figure 2: Example input values for execution of the Step Functions workflow

    Figure 2: Example input values for execution of the Step Functions workflow

  6. This will start the Step Functions workflow and redirect you to the Graph view. If successful, you will see that the overall Execution status and each step have a status of Successful.
  7. For long-running jobs, you can view the CloudWatch log group associated with the Lambda function to view the logs.
  8. To track the number of Security Hub findings that have been exported, open the Systems Manager console, choose Parameter Store, and then select the /sechubexport/findingcount parameter. Under Value, you will see the total number of Security Hub findings that have been exported, as shown in Figure 3.
    Figure 3: Systems Manager Parameter Store value for the number of Security Hub findings exported

    Figure 3: Systems Manager Parameter Store value for the number of Security Hub findings exported

Depending on the number of Security Hub findings, this process can take some time. This is primarily due to the GetFindings quota of 3 requests per second. Each GetFindings request can return a maximum of 100 findings, so this means that you can get up to 300 findings per second. On average, the solution can export about 1 million findings per hour. If you have a large number of findings, you can start the finding export process and wait for the SNS topic to notify you when the process is complete.

How to customize the solution

The solution provides a general framework to help you export your historical Security Hub findings. There are many ways that you can customize this solution based on your needs. The following are some enhancements that you can consider.

Change the Security Hub finding filter

The solution currently pulls all findings with RecordState: ACTIVE, which pulls the active Security Hub findings in the AWS account. You can update the Lambda function code, specifically the finding_filter JSON value within the create_filter function, to pull findings for your use case. For example, to get all active Security Hub findings from the AWS Foundational Security Best Practices standard, update the Lambda function code as follows.

{
                 WorkflowState: [
                     {
                         "Value": "NEW ",
                         "Comparison": "EQUALS"
                     },
                 ],
                 "RecordState": [
                     {
                         "Value": "ACTIVE",
                         "Comparison": "EQUALS"
                     },
                 ]
            }

Export more than 100 million Security Hub findings

The example solution can export about 100 million Security Hub findings. This number is primarily determined by the speed at which findings can be exported, due to the following factors:

If you want to export more than 100 million Security Hub findings, do one of the following:

Note: If you implement either of these solutions, make sure that the nextToken also gets passed to the new Step Functions execution by updating the Lambda function code to parse and pass the nextToken received in the last request.

Speed up the export

One way to increase the export bandwidth, and reduce the overall execution time, is to run the export job in parallel across the individual Security Hub member accounts rather than from the single delegated administrator account.

You could use CloudFormation StackSets to deploy this solution in each Security Hub member account and send the findings to a centralized S3 bucket. You would need to modify the solution to allow an S3 bucket to be provided as an input, and all the Lambda function Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles would need cross-account access to the S3 bucket and corresponding AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) key. You would also need to make updates in each member account to iterate through the various Regions in which the Security Hub findings exist.

Next steps

The solution in this post is designed to assist in the retrieval and export of all existing findings currently in Security Hub. After you successfully run this solution to export historical findings, you can continuously export new Security Hub findings by using the sample solution in the aws-security-hub-findings-export GitHub repository.

Now that you’ve exported the Security Hub findings, you can set up and run custom complex reporting or queries against the S3 bucket by using Amazon Athena and AWS Glue. Additionally, you can run machine learning and analytics capabilities by using services like Amazon SageMaker or Amazon Lookout for Metrics.

Conclusion

In this post, you deployed a solution to export the existing Security Hub findings in your account to a central S3 bucket, so that you can apply complex analytics and machine learning to those findings. We walked you through how to use the solution and apply it to some example use cases after you successfully exported existing findings across your AWS environment. Now your security team can use the data in the S3 bucket for predictive analytics and determine if there are Security Hub findings and specific resources that might need to be prioritized for review due to a deviation from normal behavior. Additionally, you can use this solution to enable more complex analytics on multiple fields by querying large and complex datasets with AWS Athena.

If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, start a thread on AWS Security Hub re:Post.

 
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.

Jonathan Nguyen

Jonathan Nguyen

Jonathan is a Shared Delivery Team Senior Security Consultant at AWS. His background is in AWS Security with a focus on threat detection and incident response. Today, he helps enterprise customers develop a comprehensive security strategy and deploy security solutions at scale, and he trains customers on AWS Security best practices.

Microservice observability with Amazon OpenSearch Service part 1: Trace and log correlation

Post Syndicated from Subham Rakshit original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/part-1-microservice-observability-with-amazon-opensearch-service-trace-and-log-correlation/

Modern enterprises are increasingly adopting microservice architectures and moving away from monolithic structures. Although microservices provide agility in development and scalability, and encourage use of polyglot systems, they also add complexity. Troubleshooting distributed services is hard because the application behavioral data is distributed across multiple machines. Therefore, in order to have deep insights to troubleshoot distributed applications, operational teams need to collect application behavioral data in one place to scan through them.

Although setting up monitoring systems focuses on analyzing only log data can help you understand what went wrong and notify about any anomalies, it fails to provide insight into why something went wrong and exactly where in the application code it went wrong. Fixing issues in a complex network of systems is like finding a needle in a haystack. Observability based on Open Standards defined by OpenTelemetry addresses the problem by providing support to handle logs, traces, and metrics within a single implementation.

In this series, we cover the setup and troubleshooting of a distributed microservice application using logs and traces. Logs are immutable, timestamped, discreet events happening over a period of time, whereas traces are a series of related events that capture the end-to-end request flow in a distributed system. We look into how to collect a large volume of logs and traces in Amazon OpenSearch Service and correlate these logs and traces to find the actual issue and where the issue was generated.

Any investigation of issues in enterprise applications needs to be logged in an incident report, so that operational and development teams can collaborate to roll out a fix. When any investigation is carried out, it’s important to write a narrative about the issue so that it can be used in discussion later. We look into how to use the latest notebook feature in OpenSearch Service to create the incident report.

In this post, we discuss the architecture and application troubleshooting steps.

Solution overview

The following diagram illustrates the observability solution architecture to capture logs and traces.

The solution components are as follows:

  • Amazon OpenSearch Service is a managed AWS service that makes it easy to deploy, operate, and scale OpenSearch clusters in the AWS Cloud. OpenSearch Service supports OpenSearch and legacy Elasticsearch open-source software (up to 7.10, the final open-source version of the software).
  • FluentBit is an open-source processor and forwarder that collects, enriches, and sends metrics and logs to various destinations.
  • AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry is a secure, production-ready, AWS-supported distribution of the OpenTelemetry project. With AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry, you can instrument your applications just once to send correlated metrics and traces to multiple AWS and Partner monitoring solutions, including OpenSearch Service.
  • Data Prepper is an open-source utility service with the ability to filter, enrich, transform, normalize, and aggregate data to enable an end-to-end analysis lifecycle, from gathering raw logs to facilitating sophisticated and actionable interactive ad hoc analyses on the data.
  • We use a sample observability shop web application built as a microservice to demonstrate the capabilities of the solution components.
  • Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that you can use to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install, operate, and maintain your own Kubernetes control plane or nodes. Kubernetes is an open-source system for automating the deployment, scaling, and management of the container.

In this solution, we have a sample o11y (Observability) Shop web application written in Python and Java, and deployed in an EKS cluster. The web application is composed of various services. When some operations are done from the front end, the request travels through multiple services on the backend. The application services are running as separate containers, while AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry, FluentBit, and Data Prepper are running as sidecar containers.

FluentBit is used for collecting log data from application containers, and then sends logs to Data Prepper. For collecting traces, first the application services are instrumented using the OpenTelemetry SDK. Then, with AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry collector, trace information is collected and sent to Data Prepper. Data Prepper forwards the logs and traces data to OpenSearch Service.

We recommend deploying the OpenSearch Service domain within a VPC, so a reverse proxy is needed to be able to log in to OpenSearch Dashboards.

Prerequisite

You need an AWS account with necessary permissions to deploy the solution.

Set up the environment

We use AWS CloudFormation to provision the components of our architecture. Complete the following steps:

  1. Launch the CloudFormation stack in the us-east-1 Region:
  2. You may keep the stack name default to AOS-Observability.
  3. You may change the OpenSearchMasterUserName parameter used for OpenSearch Service login while keeping other parameter values to default. The stack provisions a VPC, subnets, security groups, route tables, an AWS Cloud9 instance, and an OpenSearch Service domain, along with a Nginx reverse proxy. It also configures AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles. The stack will also generate a new random password for OpenSearch Service domain which can be seen in the CloudFormation Outputs tab under AOSDomainPassword.
  4. On the stack’s Outputs tab, choose the link for the AWS Cloud9 IDE.
  5. Run the following code to install the required packages, configure the environment variables and provision the EKS cluster:
    curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aws-samples/observability-with-amazon-opensearch-blog/main/scripts/eks-setup.sh | bash -s <<CloudFormation Stack Name>>

    After the resources are deployed, it prints the hostname for the o11y Shop web application.

  6. Copy the hostname and enter it in the browser.

This opens the o11y Shop microservice application, as shown in the following screenshot.

Access the OpenSearch Dashboards

To access the OpenSearch Dashboards, complete the following steps:

  1. Choose the link for AOSDashboardsPublicIP from the CloudFormation stack outputs. Because the OpenSearch Service domain is deployed inside the VPC, we use an Nginx reverse proxy to forward the traffic to the OpenSearch Service domain. Because the OpenSearch Dashboards URL is signed using a self-signed certificate, you need to bypass the security exception. In production, a valid certificate is recommended for secure access.
  2. Assuming you’re using Google Chrome, while you are on this page, enter thisisunsafe.Google Chrome redirects you to the OpenSearch Service login page.
  3. Log in with the OpenSearch Service login details (found in the CloudFormation stack output: AOSDomainUserName and AOSDomainPassword).You’re presented with a dialog requesting you to add data for exploration.
  4. Select Explore on my own.
  5. When asked to select a tenant, leave the default options and choose Confirm.
  6. Open the Hamburger menu to explore the plugins within OpenSearch Dashboards.

This is the OpenSearch Dashboards user interface. We use it in the next steps to analyze, explore, fix, and find the root cause of the issue.

Logs and traces generation

Click around the o11y Shop application to simulate user actions. This will generate logs and some traces for the associated microservices stored in OpenSearch Service. You can do the process multiple times to generate more sample logs and traces data.

Create an index pattern

An index pattern selects the data to use and allows you to define properties of the fields. An index pattern can point to one or more indexes, data streams, or index aliases.

You need to create an index pattern to query the data through OpenSearch Dashboards.

  1. On OpenSearch Dashboards, choose Stack Management.
  2. Choose Index Patterns
  3. Choose Create index pattern.
  4. For Index pattern name, enter sample_app_logs. OpenSearch Dashboards also supports wildcards.
  5. Choose Next step.
  6. For Time field, choose time.
  7. Choose Create index pattern.
  8. Repeat these steps to create the index pattern otel-v1-apm-span* with event.time as the time field for discovering traces.

Search logs

Choose the menu icon and look for the Discover section in OpenSearch Dashboards. The Discover panel allows you to view and query logs. Check the log activity happening in the microservice application.

If you can’t see any data, increase the time range to something large (like the last hour). Alternatively, you can play around the o11y Shop application to generate recent logs and traces data.

Instrument applications to generate traces

Applications need to be instrumented to generate and send trace data downstream. There are two types of instrumentation:

  • Automatic – In automatic instrumentation, no application code change is required. It uses an agent that can capture trace data from the running application. It requires usage of the language-specific API and SDK, which takes the configuration provided through the code or environment and provides good coverage of endpoints and operations. It automatically determines the span start and end.
  • Manual – In manual instrumentation, developers need to add trace capture code to the application. This provides customization in terms of capturing traces for a custom code block, naming various components in OpenTelemetry like traces and spans, adding attributes and events, and handling specific exceptions within the code.

In our application code, we use manual instrumentation. Refer to Manual Instrumentation to collect traces in the GitHub repository to understand the steps.

Explore trace analytics

OpenSearch Service version 1.3 has a new module to support observability.

  1. Choose the menu icon and look for the Observability section under OpenSearch Plugins.
  2. Choose Trace analytics to examine some of the traces generated by the backend service. If you fail to see sufficient data, increase the time range. Alternatively, choose all the buttons on the sample app webpage for each application service to generate sufficient trace data to debug. You can choose each option multiple times. The following screenshot shows a summarized view of the traces captured.

    The dashboard view groups traces together by trace group name and provides information about average latency, error rate, and trends associated with a particular operation. Latency variance indicates if the latency of a request falls below the 95 percentile or above. If there are multiple trace groups, you can reduce the view by adding filters on various parameters.
  3. Add a filter on the trace group client_checkout.

    The following screenshot shows our filtered results.

    The dashboard also features a map of all the connected services. The Service map helps provide a high-level view on what’s going on in the services based on the color-coding grouped by Latency, Error rate, and Throughput. This helps you identify problems by service.
  4. Choose Error rate to explore the error rate of the connected services.Based on the color-coding in the following diagram, it’s evident that the payment service is throwing errors, whereas other services are working fine without any errors.
  5. Switch to the Latency view, which shows the relative latency in milliseconds with different colors.
    This is useful for troubleshooting bottlenecks in microservices.

    The Trace analytics dashboard also shows distribution of traces over time and trace error rate over time.
  6. To discover the list of traces, under Trace analytics in the navigation pane, choose Traces.
  7. To find the list of services, count of traces per service, and other service-level statistics, choose Services in the navigation pane.

Search traces

Now we want to drill down and learn more about how to troubleshoot errors.

  1. Go back to the Trace analytics dashboard.
  2. Choose Error Rate Service Map and choose the payment service on the graph.The payment service is in dark red. This also sets the payment service filter on the dashboard, and you can see the trace group in the upper pane.
  3. Choose the Traces link of the client_checkout trace group.

    You’re redirected to the Traces page. The list of traces for the client_checkout trace group can be found here.
  4. To view details of the traces, choose Trace IDs.You can see a pie chart showing how much time the trace has spent in each service. The trace is composed of multiple spans, which is defined as a timed operation that represents a piece of workflow in the distributed system. On the right, you can also see time spent in each span, and which have an error.
  5. Copy the trace ID in the client-checkout group.

Log and trace correlation

Although the log and trace data provides valuable information individually, the actual advantage is when we can relate trace data to log data to capture more details about what went wrong. There are three ways we can correlate traces to logs:

  • Runtime – Logs, traces, and metrics can record the moment of time or the range of time the run took place.
  • Run context – This is also known as the request context. It’s standard practice to record the run context (trace and span IDs as well as user-defined context) in the spans. OpenTelemetry extends this practice to logs where possible by including the TraceID and SpanID in the log records. This allows us to directly correlate logs and traces that correspond to the same run context. It also allows us to correlate logs from different components of a distributed system that participated in the particular request.
  • Origin of the telemetry – This is also known as the resource context. OpenTelemetry traces and metrics contain information about the resource they come from. We extend this practice to logs by including the resource in the log records.

These three correlation methods can be the foundation of powerful navigational, filtering, querying, and analytical capabilities. OpenTelemetry aims to record and collect logs in a manner that enables such correlations.

  1. Use the copied traceId from the previous section and search for corresponding logs on the Event analytics page.
    We use the following PPL query:

    source = sample_app_logs | where traceId = “<<trace_id>>”

    Make sure to increase the time range to at least the last hour.

  2. Choose Update to find the corresponding log data for the trace ID.
  3. Choose the expand icon to find more details.This shows you the details of the log including the traceId. This log shows that the payment checkout operation failed. This correlation allowed us to find key information in the log that allows us to go to the application and debug the code.
  4. Choose the Traces tab to see the corresponding trace data linked with the log data.
  5. Choose View surrounding events to discover other events happening at the same time.

This information can be valuable when you want to understand what’s going on in the whole application, particularly how other services are impacted during that time.

Cleanup

This section provides the necessary information for deleting various resources created as part of this post.

It is recommended to perform the below steps after going through the next post of the series.

  1. Execute the following command on the Cloud9 terminal to remove Elastic Kubernetes Service Cluster and its resources.
    eksctl delete cluster --name=observability-cluster

  2. Execute the script to delete the Amazon Elastic Container Registry repositories.
    cd observability-with-amazon-opensearch-blog/scripts
    bash 03-delete-ecr-repo.sh

  3. Delete the CloudFormation stacks in sequence - eksDeploy, AOS-Observability.

Summary

In this post, we deployed an Observability (o11y) Shop microservice application with various services and captured logs and traces from the application. We used FluentBit to capture logs, AWS Distro for Open Telemetry to capture traces, and Data Prepper to collect these logs and traces and send it to OpenSearch Service. We showed how to use the Trace analytics page to look into the captured traces, details about those traces, and service maps to find potential issues. To correlate log and trace data, we demonstrated how to use the Event analytics page to write a simple PPL query to find corresponding log data. The implementation code can be found in the GitHub repository for reference.

The next post in our series covers the use of PPL to create an operational panel to monitor our microservices along with an incident report using notebooks.


About the Author

Subham Rakshit is a Streaming Specialist Solutions Architect for Analytics at AWS based in the UK. He works with customers to design and build search and streaming data platforms that help them achieve their business objective. Outside of work, he enjoys spending time solving jigsaw puzzles with his daughter.

Marvin Gersho is a Senior Solutions Architect at AWS based in New York City. He works with a wide range of startup customers. He previously worked for many years in engineering leadership and hands-on application development, and now focuses on helping customers architect secure and scalable workloads on AWS with a minimum of operational overhead. In his free time, Marvin enjoys cycling and strategy board games.

Rafael Gumiero is a Senior Analytics Specialist Solutions Architect at AWS. An open-source and distributed systems enthusiast, he provides guidance to customers who develop their solutions with AWS Analytics services, helping them optimize the value of their solutions.

How to Automatically Prevent Email Throttling when Reaching Concurrency Limit

Post Syndicated from Mark Richman original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/prevent-email-throttling-concurrency-limit/

Introduction

Many users of Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES) send large email campaigns that target tens of thousands of recipients. Regulating the flow of Amazon SES requests can prevent throttling due to exceeding the AWS service limit on the account.

Amazon SES service quotas include a soft limit on the number of emails sent per second (also known as the “sending rate”). This quota is intended to protect users from accidentally sending unintended volumes of email, or from spending more money than intended. Most Amazon SES customers have this quota increased, but very large campaigns may still exceed that limit. As a result, Amazon SES will throttle email requests. When this happens, your messages will fail to reach their destination.

This blog provides users of Amazon SES a mechanism for regulating the flow of messages that are sent to Amazon SES. Cloud Architects, Engineers, and DevOps Engineers designing new, or improving an existing Amazon SES solution would benefit from reading this post.

Overview

A common solution for regulating the flow of API requests to Amazon SES is achieved using Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS). Amazon SQS can send, store, and receive messages at virtually any volume and can serve as part of a solution to buffer and throttle the rate of API calls. It achieves this without the need for other services to be available to process the messages. In this solution, Amazon SQS prevents messages from being lost while waiting for them to be sent as emails.

Fig 1 — High level architecture diagram

But this common solution introduces a new challenge. The mechanism used by the Amazon SQS event source mapping for AWS Lambda invokes a function as soon as messages are visible. Our challenge is to regulate the flow of messages, rather than invoke Amazon SES as messages arrive to the queue.

Fig 2 — Leaky bucket

Developers typically limit the flow of messages in a distributed system by implementing the “leaky bucket” algorithm. This algorithm is an analogy to a bucket which has a hole in the bottom from which water leaks out at a constant rate. Water can be added to the bucket intermittently. If too much water is added at once or at too high a rate, the bucket overflows.

In this solution, we prevent this overflow by using throttling. Throttling can be handled in two ways: either before messages reach Amazon SQS, or after messages are removed from the queue (“dequeued”). Both of these methods pose challenges in handling the throttled messages and reprocessing them. These challenges introduce complexity and lead to the excessive use of resources that may cause a snowball effect and make the throttling worse.

Developers often use the following techniques to help improve the successful processing of feeds and submissions:

  • Submit requests at times other than on the hour or on the half hour. For example, submit requests at 11 minutes after the hour or at 41 minutes after the hour. This can have the effect of limiting competition for system resources with other periodic services.
  • Take advantage of times during the day when traffic is likely to be low, such as early evening or early morning hours.

However, these techniques assume that you have control over the rate of requests, which is usually not the case.

Amazon SQS, acting as a highly scalable buffer, allows you to disregard the incoming message rate and store messages at virtually any volume. Therefore, there is no need to throttle messages before adding them to the queue. As long as you eventually process messages faster than you receive new ones, you will be fine with the inflow that will get processed later on.

Regulating flow of messages from Amazon SQS

The proposed solution in this post regulates the dequeue of messages from one or more SQS queues. This approach can help prevent you from exceeding the per-second quota of Amazon SES, thereby preventing Amazon SES from throttling your API calls.

Available configuration controls

When it comes to regulating outflow from Amazon SQS you have a few options. MaxNumberOfMessages controls the maximum number of messages you can dequeue in a single read request. WaitTimeSeconds defines whether Amazon SQS uses short polling (0 seconds wait) or long polling (more than 0 seconds) while waiting to read messages from a queue. Though these capabilities are helpful in many use cases, they don’t provide full control over outflow rates.

Amazon SQS Event source mapping for Lambda is a built-in mechanism that uses a poller within the Lambda service. The poller polls for visible messages in the queue. Once messages are read, they immediately invoke the configured Lambda function. In order to prevent downstream throttling, this solution implements a custom poller to regulate the rate of messages polled instead of the Amazon SQS Event source mechanism.

Custom poller Lambda

Let’s look at the process of implementing a custom poller Lambda function. Your function should actively regulate the outflow rate without throttling or losing any messages.

First, you have to consider how to invoke the poller Lambda function once every second. Using Amazon EventBridge rules you can schedule Lambda invocations at a rate of once per minute. You also have to consider how to complete processing of Amazon SES invocations as soon as possible. And finally, you have to consider how to send requests to Amazon SES at a rate as close as possible to your per-second quota, without exceeding it.

You can use long polling to meet all of these requirements. Using long polling (by setting the WaitTimeSeconds value to a number greater than zero) means the request queries all of the Amazon SQS servers, or waits until the maximum number of messages you can handle per second (the MaxNumberOfMessages value) are read. By setting the MaxNumberOfMessages equal to your Amazon SES request per-second quota, you prevent your requests from exceeding that limit.

By splitting the looping logic from the poll logic (by using two Lambda functions) the code loops every second (60 times per minute) and asynchronously runs the polling logic.

Fig 3 — Custom poller diagram

You can use the following Python code to create the scheduler loop function:

import os
from time import sleep, time_ns

import boto3

SENDER_FUNCTION_NAME = os.getenv("SENDER_FUNCTION_NAME")
lambda_client = boto3.client("lambda")

def lambda_handler(event, context):
    print(event)

    for _ in range(60):
        prev_ns = time_ns()

        response = lambda_client.invoke_async( 
            FunctionName=SENDER_FUNCTION_NAME, InvokeArgs="{}" 
        ) 
        print(response)

        delta_ns = time_ns() - prev_ns

        if delta_ns < 1_000_000_000: 
            secs = (1_000_000_000.0 - delta_ns) / 1_000_000_000 
            sleep(secs)

This Python code creates a poller function:

import json 
import os

import boto3

UNREGULATED_QUEUE_URL = os.getenv("UNREGULATED_QUEUE_URL") 
MAX_NUMBER_OF_MESSAGES = 3 
WAIT_TIME_SECONDS = 1 
CHARSET = "UTF-8"

ses_client = boto3.client("ses") 
sqs_client = boto3.client("sqs")

def lambda_handler(event, context): 
    response = sqs_client.receive_message( 
        QueueUrl=UNREGULATED_QUEUE_URL, 
        MaxNumberOfMessages=MAX_NUMBER_OF_MESSAGES, 
        WaitTimeSeconds=WAIT_TIME_SECONDS, 
    )

    try: 
        messages = response["Messages"] 
    except KeyError: 
        print("No messages in queue") 
        return

    for message in messages: 
        message_body = json.loads(message["Body"]) 
        to_address = message_body["to_address"] 
        from_address = message_body["from_address"] 
        subject = message_body["subject"] 
        body = message_body["body"]

        print(f"Sending email to {to_address}")

        ses_client.send_email( 
            Destination={ 
                "ToAddresses": [ 
                    to_address, 
                ], 
            }, 
            Message={ 
                "Body": { 
                    "Text": { 
                        "Charset": CHARSET, 
                        "Data": body, 
                    } 
                }, 
                "Subject": { 
                    "Charset": CHARSET, 
                    "Data": subject, 
                }, 
            }, 
            Source=from_address, 
        )

        sqs_client.delete_message( 
            QueueUrl=UNREGULATED_QUEUE_URL, ReceiptHandle=message["ReceiptHandle"] 
        )

Regulating flow of prioritized messages from Amazon SQS

In the use case above, you may be serving a very large marketing campaign (“campaign1”) that takes hours to process. At the same time, you may want to process another, much smaller campaign (“campaign2″), which won’t be able to run until campaign1 is complete.

Obvious solution is to prioritize the campaigns by processing both campaigns in parallel. For example, allocate 90% of the Amazon SES per-second capacity limit to process the larger campaign1, while allowing the smaller campaign2 to take 10% of the available capacity under the limit. Amazon SQS does not provide message priority functionalities out-of-the-box. Instead, create two separate queues and poll each queue according to your desired frequency.

Fig 4 — Prioritize campaigns by queue diagram

This solution works fine if you have consistent flow of incoming messages to both queues. Unfortunately, once you finish processing campaign2 you will keep processing campaign1, using only 90% of the limit capacity per second.

Handling unbalanced flow

For handling unbalanced flow of messages merge both of your poller Lambdas. Implement one Lambda that polls both queues for MaxNumberOfMessages (that equals 100% of the limits of both). In this implementation send from your poller Lambda 90% of campaign1 messages and 10% of campaign2 messages. When campaign2 no longer has messages to process, keep processing 100% of the capacity from campaign1’s queue.

Do not delete unsent messages from the queues. These messages will become visible after their queue’s visibility timeout is reached.

To further improve on the previous implementations, introduce a third FIFO Queue to aggregate all messages from both queues and regulate dequeuing from that third FIFO queue. This will allow you to use all available capacity under your SES limit, while interweaving messages from both campaigns at a 1:10 ratio.

Fig 5 — Adding FIFO merge queue diagram

Processing 100% of the available capacity limit of the large campaign1 and 10% of the capacity limit of the small campaign2 allows you to make sure campign2 messages will not wait until campaign1 messages were all processed. Once campain2 messages are all processed, campign1 messages will continue to be processed using 100% of the capacity limit.

You can find here instructions for Configuring Amazon SQS queues.

Conclusion

In this blog post, we have shown you how to regulate the dequeue of Amazon SQS queue messages. This will prevent you from exceeding your Amazon SES per second limit. This will also remove the need to deal with throttled requests. We explained how to combine Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda, Amazon EventBridge to create a custom serverless regulating queue poller. Finally, we described how to regulate the flow of Amazon SES requests when using multiple priority queues. These technics can reduce implementation time for reprocessing throttled requests, optimize utilization of SES request limit, and reduce costs.

About the Authors

This blog post was written by Guy Loewy and Mark Richman, AWS Senior Solutions Architects for SMB.

Building highly resilient applications with on-premises interdependencies using AWS Local Zones

Post Syndicated from Sheila Busser original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-highly-resilient-applications-with-on-premises-interdependencies-using-aws-local-zones/

This blog post is written by Rachel Rui Liu, Senior Solutions Architect.

AWS Local Zones are a type of infrastructure deployment that places compute, storage, database, and other select AWS services close to large population and industry centers.

Following the successful launch of the AWS Local Zones in 16 US cities since 2019, in Feb 2022, AWS announced plans to launch new AWS Local Zones in 32 metropolitan areas in 26 countries worldwide.

With Local Zones, we’ve seen use cases in two common categories.

The first category of use cases is for workloads that require extremely low latency between end-user devices and workload servers. For example, let’s consider media content creation and real-time multiplayer gaming. For these use cases, deploying the workload to a Local Zone can help achieve down to single-digit milliseconds latency between end-user devices and the AWS infrastructure, which is ideal for a good end-user experience.

This post will focus on addressing the second category of use cases, which is commonly seen in an enterprise hybrid architecture, where customers must achieve low latency between AWS infrastructure and existing on-premises data centers.  Compared to the first category of use cases, these use cases can tolerate slightly higher latency between the end-user devices and the AWS infrastructure. However, these workloads have dependencies to these on-premises systems, so the lowest possible latency between AWS infrastructure and on-premises data centers is required for better application performance. Here are a few examples of these systems:

  • Financial services sector mainframe workloads hosted on premises serving regional customers.
  • Enterprise Active Directory hosted on premise serving cloud and on-premises workloads.
  • Enterprise applications hosted on premises processing a high volume of locally generated data.

For workloads deployed in AWS, the time taken for each interaction with components still hosted in the on-premises data center is increased by the latency. In turn, this delays responses received by the end-user. The total latency accumulates and results in suboptimal user experiences.

By deploying modernized workloads in Local Zones, you can reduce latency while continuing to access systems hosted in on-premises data centers, thereby reducing the total latency for the end-user. At the same time, you can enjoy the benefits of agility, elasticity, and security offered by AWS, and can apply the same automation, compliance, and security best practices that you’ve been familiar with in the AWS Regions.

Enterprise workload resiliency with Local Zones

While designing hybrid architectures with Local Zones, resiliency is an important consideration. You want to route traffic to the nearest Local Zone for low latency. However, when disasters happen, it’s critical to fail over to the parent Region automatically.

Let’s look at the details of hybrid architecture design based on real world deployments from different angles to understand how the architecture achieves all of the design goals.

Hybrid architecture with resilient network connectivity

The following diagram shows a high-level overview of a resilient enterprise hybrid architecture with Local Zones, where you have redundant connections between the AWS Region, the Local Zone, and the corporate data center.

resillient network connectivity

Here are a few key points with this network connectivity design:

  1. Use AWS Direct Connect or Site-to-Site VPN to connect the corporate data center and AWS Region.
  2. Use Direct Connect or self-hosted VPN to connect the corporate data center and the Local Zone. This connection will provide dedicated low-latency connectivity between the Local Zone and corporate data center.
  3. Transit Gateway is a regional service. When attaching the VPC to AWS Transit Gateway, you can only add subnets provisioned in the Region. Instances on subnets in the Local Zone can still use Transit Gateway to reach resources in the Region.
  4. For subnets provisioned in the Region, the VPC route table should be configured to route the traffic to the corporate data center via Transit Gateway.
  5. For subnets provisioned in Local Zone, the VPC route table should be configured to route the traffic to the corporate data center via the self-hosted VPN instance or Direct Connect.

Hybrid architecture with resilient workload deployment

The next examples show a public and a private facing workload.

To simplify the diagram and focus on application layer architecture, the following diagrams assume that you are using Direct Connect to connect between AWS and the on-premises data center.

Example 1: Resilient public facing workload

With a public facing workload, end-user traffic will be routed to the Local Zone. If the Local Zone is unavailable, then the traffic will be routed to the Region automatically using an Amazon Route 53 failover policy.

public facing workload resilliency
Here are the key design considerations for this architecture:

  1. Deploy the workload in the Local Zone and put the compute layer in an AWS AutoScaling Group, so that the application can scale up and down depending on volume of requests.
  2. Deploy the workload in both the Local Zone and an AWS Region, and put the compute layer into an autoscaling group. The regional deployment will act as pilot light or warm standby with minimal footprint. But it can scale out when the Local Zone is unavailable.
  3. Two Application Load Balancers (ALBs) are required: one in the Region and one in the Local Zone. Each ALB will dispatch the traffic to each workload cluster inside the autoscaling group local to it.
  4. An internet gateway is required for public facing workloads. When using a Local Zone, there’s no extra configuration needed: define a single internet gateway and attach it to the VPC.

If you want to specify an Elastic IP address to be the workload’s public endpoint, the Local Zone will have a different address pool than the Region. Noting that BYOIP is unsupported for Local Zones.

  1. Create a Route 53 DNS record with “Failover” as the routing policy.
  • For the primary record, point it to the alias of the ALB in the Local Zone. This will set Local Zone as the preferred destination for the application traffic which minimizes latency for end-users.
  • For the secondary record, point it to the alias of the ALB in the AWS Region.
  • Enable health check for the primary record. If health check against the primary record fails, which indicates that the workload deployed in the Local Zone has failed to respond, then Route 53 will automatically point to the secondary record, which is the workload deployed in the AWS Region.

Example 2: Resilient private workload

For a private workload that’s only accessible by internal users, a few extra considerations must be made to keep the traffic inside of the trusted private network.

private workload resilliency

The architecture for resilient private facing workload has the same steps as public facing workload, but with some key differences. These include:

  1. Instead of using a public hosted zone, create private hosted zones in Route 53 to respond to DNS queries for the workload.
  2. Create the primary and secondary records in Route 53 just like the public workload but referencing the private ALBs.
  3. To allow end-users onto the corporate network (within offices or connected via VPN) to resolve the workload, use the Route 53 Resolver with an inbound endpoint. This allows end-users located on-premises to resolve the records in the private hosted zone. Route 53 Resolver is designed to be integrated with an on-premises DNS server.
  4. No internet gateway is required for hosting the private workload. You might need an internet gateway in the Local Zone for other purposes: for example, to host a self-managed VPN solution to connect the Local Zone with the corporate data center.

Hosting multiple workloads

Customers who host multiple workloads in a single VPC generally must consider how to segregate those workloads. As with workloads in the AWS Region, segregation can be implemented at a subnet or VPC level.

If you want to segregate workloads at the subnet level, you can extend your existing VPC architecture by provisioning extra sets of subnets to the Local Zone.

segregate workloads at subnet level

Although not shown in the diagram, for those of you using a self-hosted VPN to connect the Local Zone with an on-premises data center, the VPN solution can be deployed in a centralized subnet.

You can continue to use security groups, network access control lists (NACLs) , and VPC route tables – just as you would in the Region to segregate the workloads.

If you want to segregate workloads at the VPC level, like many of our customers do, within the Region, inter-VPC routing is generally handled by Transit Gateway. However, in this case, it may be undesirable to send traffic to the Region to reach a subnet in another VPC that is also extended to the Local Zone.

segregate workloads at VPC level

Key considerations for this design are as follows:

  1. Direct Connect is deployed to connect the Local Zone with the corporate data center. Therefore, each VPC will have a dedicated Virtual Private Gateway provisioned to allow association with the Direct Connect Gateway.
  2. To enable inter-VPC traffic within the Local Zone, peer the two VPCs together.
  3. Create a VPC route table in VPC A. Add a route for Subnet Y where the destination is the peering link. Assign this route table to Subnet X.
  4. Create a VPC route table in VPC B. Add a route for Subnet X where the destination is the peering link. Assign this route table to Subnet Y.
  5. If necessary, add routes for on-premises networks and the transit gateway to both route tables.

This design allows traffic between subnets X and Y to stay within the Local Zone, thereby avoiding any latency from the Local Zone to the AWS Region while still permitting full connectivity to all other networks.

Conclusion

In this post, we summarized the use cases for enterprise hybrid architecture with Local Zones, and showed you:

  • Reference architectures to host workloads in Local Zones with low-latency connectivity to corporate data centers and resiliency to enable fail over to the AWS Region automatically.
  • Different design considerations for public and private facing workloads utilizing this hybrid architecture.
  • Segregation and connectivity considerations when extending this hybrid architecture to host multiple workloads.

Hopefully you will be able to follow along with these reference architectures to build and run highly resilient applications with local system interdependencies using Local Zones.

Adding approval notifications to EC2 Image Builder before sharing AMIs

Post Syndicated from Sheila Busser original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/adding-approval-notifications-to-ec2-image-builder-before-sharing-amis-2/

­­­­­This blog post is written by, Glenn Chia Jin Wee, Associate Cloud Architect, and Randall Han, Professional Services.

You may be required to manually validate the Amazon Machine Image (AMI) built from an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) Image Builder pipeline before sharing this AMI to other AWS accounts or to an AWS organization. Currently, Image Builder provides an end-to-end pipeline that automatically shares AMIs after they’ve been built.

In this post, we will walk through the steps to enable approval notifications before AMIs are shared with other AWS accounts. Image Builder supports automated image testing using test components. The recommended best practice is to automate test steps, however situations can arise where test steps become either challenging to automate or internal compliance policies mandate manual checks be conducted prior to distributing images. In such situations, having a manual approval step is useful if you would like to verify the AMI configuration before it is shared to other AWS accounts or an AWS Organization. A manual approval step reduces the potential for sharing an incorrectly configured AMI with other teams which can lead to downstream issues. This solution sends an email with a link to approve or reject the AMI. Users approve the AMI after they’ve verified that it is built according to specifications. Upon approving the AMI, the solution automatically shares it with the specified AWS accounts.

OverviewArchitecture Diagram

  1. In this solution, an Image Builder Pipeline is run that builds a Golden AMI in Account A. After the AMI is built, Image Builder publishes data about the AMI to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS)
  2. The SNS Topic passes the data to an AWS Lambda function that subscribes to it.
  3. The Lambda function that subscribes to this topic retrieves the data, formats it, and then starts an SSM Automation, passing it the AMI Name and ID.
  4. The first step of the SSM Automation is a manual approval step. The SSM Automation first publishes to an SNS Topic that has an email subscription with the Approver’s email. The approver will receive the email with a URL that they can click to approve the step.
  5. The approval step defines a specific AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) Role as an approver. This role has the minimum required permissions to approve the manual approval step. After performing manual tests on the Golden AMI, the Approver principal will assume this role.
  6. After assuming this role, the approver will click on the approval link that was sent via email. After approving the step, an AWS Lambda Function is triggered.
  7. This Lambda Function shares the Golden AMI with Account B and sends an email notifying the Target Account Recipients that the AMI has been shared.

Prerequisites

For this walkthrough, you will need the following:

  • Two AWS accounts – one to host the solution resources, and the second which receives the shared Golden AMI.
    • In the account that hosts the solution, prepare an AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) principal with the sts:AssumeRole permission. This principal must assume the IAM Role that is listed as an approver in the Systems Manager approval step. The ARN of this IAM principal is used in the AWS CloudFormation Approver parameter, This ARN is added to the trust policy of approval IAM Role.
    • In addition, in the account hosting the solution, ensure that the IAM principal deploying the CloudFormation template has the required permissions to create the resources in the stack.
  • A new Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC) will be created from the stack. Make sure that you have fewer than five VPCs in the selected Region.

Walkthrough

In this section, we will guide you through the steps required to deploy the Image Builder solution. The solution is deployed with CloudFormation.

In this scenario, we deploy the solution within the approver’s account. The approval email will be sent to a predefined email address for manual approval, before the newly created AMI is shared to target accounts.

The approver first assumes the approval IAM Role and then selects the approval link. This leads to the Systems Manager approval page. Upon approval, an email notification will be sent to the predefined target account email address, notifying the relevant stakeholders that the AMI has been successfully shared.

The high-level steps we will follow are:

  1. In Account A, deploy the provided AWS CloudFormation template. This includes an example Image Builder Pipeline, Amazon SNS topics, Lambda functions, and an SSM Automation Document.
  2. Approve the SNS subscription from your supplied email address.
  3. Run the pipeline from the Amazon EC2 Image Builder Console.
  4. [Optional] To conduct manual tests, launch an Amazon EC2 instance from the built AMI after the pipeline runs.
  5. An email will be sent to you with options to approve or reject the step. Ensure that you have assumed the IAM Role that is the approver before clicking the approval link that leads to the SSM console approval page.
  6. Upon approving the step, an AWS Lambda function shares the AMI to the Account B and also sends an email to the target account email recipients notifying them that the AMI has been shared.
  7. Log in to Account B and verify that the AMI has been shared.

Step 1: Deploy the AWS CloudFormation template

1. The CloudFormation template, template.yaml that deploys the solution can also found at this GitHub repository. Follow the instructions at the repository to deploy the stack.

Step 2: Verify your email address

  1. After running the deployment, you will receive an email prompting you to confirm the Subscription at the approver email address. Choose Confirm subscription.

SNS Topic Subscription confirmation email

  1. This leads to the following screen, which shows that your subscription is confirmed.

subscription-confirmation

  1. Repeat the previous 2 steps for the target email address.

Step 3: Run the pipeline from the Image Builder console

  1. In the Image Builder console, under Image pipelines, select the checkbox next to the Pipeline created, choose Actions, and select Run pipeline.

run-image-builder-pipeline

Note: The pipeline takes approximately 20 – 30 minutes to complete.

Step 4: [Optional] Launch an Amazon EC2 instance from the built AMI

If you have a requirement to manually validate the AMI before sharing it with other accounts or to the AWS organization an approver will launch an Amazon EC2 instance from the built AMI and conduct manual tests on the EC2 instance to make sure it is functional.

  1. In the Amazon EC2 console, under Images, choose AMIs. Validate that the AMI is created.

ami-in-account-a

  1. Follow AWS docs: Launching an EC2 instances from a custom AMI for steps on how to launch an Amazon EC2 instance from the AMI.

Step 5: Select the approval URL in the email sent

  1. When the pipeline is run successfully, you will receive another email with a URL to approve the AMI.

approval-email

  1. Before clicking on the Approve link, you must assume the IAM Role that is set as an approver for the Systems Manager step.
  2. In the CloudFormation console, choose the stack that was deployed.

cloudformation-stack

4. Choose Outputs and copy the IAM Role name.

ssm-approval-role-output

5. While logged in as the IAM Principal that has permissions to assume the approval IAM Role, follow the instructions at AWS IAM documentation for switching a role using the console to assume the approval role.
In the Switch Role page, in Role paste the name of the IAM Role that you copied in the previous step.

Note: This IAM Role was deployed with minimum permissions. Hence, seeing warning messages in the console is expected after assuming this role.

switch-role

6. Now in the approval email, select the Approve URL. This leads to the Systems Manager console. Choose Submit.

approve-console

7. After approving the manual step, the second step is executed, which shares the AMI to the target account.

automation-step-success

Step 6: Verify that the AMI is shared to Account B

  1. Log in to Account B.
  2. In the Amazon EC2 console, under Images, choose AMIs. Then, in the dropdown, choose Private images. Validate that the AMI is shared.

verify-ami-in-account-b

  1. Verify that a success email notification was sent to the target account email address provided.

target-email

Clean up

This section provides the necessary information for deleting various resources created as part of this post.

  1. Deregister the AMIs that were created and shared.
    1. Log in to Account A and follow the steps at AWS documentation: Deregister your Linux AMI.
  2. Delete the CloudFormation stack. For instructions, refer to Deleting a stack on the AWS CloudFormation console.

Conclusion

In this post, we explained how to enable approval notifications for an Image Builder pipeline before AMIs are shared to other accounts. This solution can be extended to share to more than one AWS account or even to an AWS organization. With this solution, you will be notified when new golden images are created, allowing you to verify the accuracy of their configuration before sharing them to for wider use. This reduces the possibility of sharing AMIs with misconfigurations that the written tests may not have identified.

We invite you to experiment with different AMIs created using Image Builder, and with different Image Builder components. Check out this GitHub repository for various examples that use Image Builder. Also check out this blog on Image builder integrations with EC2 Auto Scaling Instance Refresh. Let us know your questions and findings in the comments, and have fun!

Fine-tuning Operations at Slice using AWS DevOps Guru

Post Syndicated from Adnan Bilwani original https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/fine-tuning-operations-at-slice-using-aws-devops-guru/

This guest post was authored by Sapan Jain, DevOps Engineer at Slice, and edited by Sobhan Archakam and Adnan Bilwani, at AWS.

Slice empowers over 18,000 independent pizzerias with the modern tools that have grown the major restaurant chains. By uniting these small businesses with specialized technology, marketing, data insights, and shared services, Slice enables them to serve their digitally-minded customers and move away from third-party apps. Using Amazon DevOps Guru, Slice is able to fine-tune their operations to better support these customers.

Serial tech entrepreneur Ilir Sela started Slice to modernize and support his family’s New York City pizzerias. Today, the company partners with restaurants in 3,000 cities and all 50 states, forming the nation’s largest pizza network. For more information, visit slicelife.com.

Slice’s challenge

At Slice, we manage a wide variety of systems, services, and platforms, all with varying levels of complexity. Observability, monitoring, and log aggregation are things we excel at, and they’re always critical for our platform engineering team. However, deriving insights from this data still requires some manual investigation, particularly when dealing with operational anomalies and/or misconfigurations.

To gain automated insights into our services and resources, Slice conducted a proof-of-concept utilizing Amazon DevOps Guru to analyze a small selection of AWS resources. Amazon DevOps Guru identified potential issues in our environment, resulting in actionable insights (ultimately leading to remediation). As a result of this analysis, we enabled Amazon DevOps Guru account-wide, thereby leading to numerous insights into our production environment.

Insights with Amazon DevOps Guru

After we configured Amazon DevOps Guru to begin its account-wide analysis, we left the tool alone to begin the process of collecting and analyzing data. We immediately began seeing some actionable insights for various production AWS resources, some of which are highlighted in the following section:

Amazon DynamoDB Point-in-time recovery

Amazon DynamoDB offers a point-in-time recovery (PITR) feature that provides continuous backups of your DynamoDB data for 35 days to help you protect against accidental write or deletes. If enabled, this lets you restore your respective table to a previous state. Amazon DevOps Guru identified several tables in our environment that had PITR disabled, along with a corresponding Recommendation.

The graphic shows proactive insights for the last 1 month. The one insight shown is 'Dynamo Table Point in Time Recovery not enabled' with a status of OnGoing and a severity of low.

The graphic shows proactive insights for the last 1 month. The one insight shown is 'Dynamo Table Point in Time Recovery not enabled' with a status of OnGoing and a severity of low.

Figure 1. The graphic shows proactive insights for the last 1 month. The one insight shown is ‘Dynamo Table Point in Time Recovery not enabled’ with a status of OnGoing and a severity of low.

Elasticache anomalous evictions

Amazon Elasticache for Redis is used by a handful of our services to cache any relevant application data. Amazon DevOps Guru identified that one of our instances was exhibiting anomalous behavior regarding its cache eviction rate. Essentially, due to the memory pressure of the instance, the eviction rate of cache entries began to increase. DevOps Guru recommended revisiting the sizing of this instance and scaling it vertically or horizontally, where appropriate.

The graph shows the metric: count of ElastiCache evictions plotted for the time period Jul 3, 20:35 to Jul 3, 21:35 UTC. A highlighted section shows that the evictions increased to a peak of 2500 between 21:00 and 21:08. Outside of this interval the evictions are below 500.

The graph shows the metric: count of ElastiCache evictions plotted for the time period Jul 3, 20:35 to Jul 3, 21:35 UTC. A highlighted section shows that the evictions increased to a peak of 2500 between 21:00 and 21:08. Outside of this interval the evictions are below 500.

Figure 2. The graph shows the metric: count of ElastiCache evictions plotted for the time period Jul 3, 20:35 to Jul 3, 21:35 UTC. A highlighted section shows that the evictions increased to a peak of 2500 between 21:00 and 21:08. Outside of this interval the evictions are below 500

AWS Lambda anomalous errors

We manage a few AWS Lambda functions that all serve different purposes. During the beginning of normal work day, we began to see increased error rates for a particular function resulting in an exception being thrown. DevOps Guru was able to detect the increase in error rates and flag them as anomalous. Although retries in this case wouldn’t have solved the problem, it did increase our visibility into the issue (which was also corroborated by our APM platform).

The graph shows the metric: count of AWS/Lambda errors plotted between 11:00 and 13:30 on Jul 6. The sections between the times 11:23 and 12:15 and at 12:37 and 13:13 UTC are highlighted to show the anomalies.

Figure 3. The graph shows the metric: count of AWS/Lambda errors plotted between 11:00 and 13:30 on Jul 6. The sections between the times 11:23 and 12:15 and at 12:37 and 13:13 UTC are highlighted to show the anomalies

Figure 3. The graph shows the metric: count of AWS/Lambda errors plotted between 11:00 and 13:30 on Jul 6. The sections between the times 11:23 and 12:15 UTC are highlighted to show the anomalies

Conclusion

Amazon DevOps Guru integrated into our environment quickly, with no more additional configuration or setup aside from a few button clicks to enable the service. After reviewing several of the proactive insights that DevOps Guru provided, we could formulate plans of action regarding remediation. One specific case example of this is where DevOps Guru flagged several of our Lambda functions for not containing enough subnets. After triaging the finding, we discovered that we were lacking multi-AZ redundancy for several of those functions. As a result, we could implement a change that maximized our availability of those resources.

With the continuous analysis that DevOps Guru performs, we continue to gain new insights into the resources that we utilize and deploy in our environment. This lets us improve operationally while simultaneously maintaining production stability.

About the author:

Adnan Bilwani

Adnan Bilwani is a Sr. Specialist Builders Experience at AWS and part of the AI for DevOps portfolio of services providing fully managed ML-based solutions to enhance your DevOps workflows.

Sobhan Archakam

Sobhan Archakam is a Senior Technical Account Manager at Amazon Web Services. He provides advocacy and guidance to Enterprise Customers to plan, build, deploy and operate solutions at scale using best practices.

Sapan Jain

Sapan Jain is a DevOps Engineer at Slice. He provides support in all facets of DevOps, and has an interest in performance, observability, automation, and troubleshooting.