You can use AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM) to securely, simply, and consistently share supported resource types within your organization or organizational units (OUs) and across AWS accounts. This means you can provision your resources once and use AWS RAM to share them with accounts. With AWS RAM, the accounts that receive the shared resources can list those resources alongside the resources they own.
When you share your resources by using AWS RAM, you can specify the actions that an account can perform and the access conditions on the shared resource. AWS RAM provides AWS managed permissions, which are created and maintained by AWS and which grant permissions for common customer scenarios. Now, you can further tailor resource access by authoring and applying fine-grained customer managed permissions in AWS RAM. A customer managed permission is a managed permission that you create to precisely specify who can do what under which conditions for the resource types included in your resource share.
This blog post walks you through how to use customer managed permissions to tailor your resource access to meet your business and security needs. Customer managed permissions help you follow the best practice of least privilege for your resources that are shared using AWS RAM.
Many AWS customers share infrastructure services to accounts in an organization from a centralized infrastructure OU. The networking account in the infrastructure OU follows the best practice of least privilege and grants only the permissions that accounts receiving these resources, such as development accounts, require to perform a specific task. The solution in this post demonstrates how you can share an Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC) IP Address Manager (IPAM) pool with the accounts in a Development OU. IPAM makes it simpler for you to plan, track, and monitor IP addresses for your AWS workloads.
You’ll use a networking account that owns an IPAM pool to share the pool with the accounts in a Development OU. You’ll do this by creating a resource share and a customer managed permission through AWS RAM. In this example, shown in Figure 1, both the networking account and the Development OU are in the same organization. The accounts in the Development OU only need the permissions that are required to allocate a classless inter-domain routing (CIDR) range and not to view the IPAM pool details. You’ll further refine access to the shared IPAM pool so that only AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) users or roles tagged with team = networking can perform actions on the IPAM pool that’s shared using AWS RAM.
Figure 1: Multi-account diagram for sharing your IPAM pool from a networking account in the Infrastructure OU to accounts in the Development OU
Prerequisites
For this walkthrough, you must have the following prerequisites:
An AWS account (the networking account) with an IPAM pool already provisioned. For this example, create an IPAM pool in a networking account named ipam-vpc-pool-use1-dev. Because you share resources across accounts in the same AWS Region using AWS RAM, provision the IPAM pool in the same Region where your development accounts will access the pool.
An AWS OU with the associated development accounts to share the IPAM pool with. In this example, these accounts are in your Development OU.
An IAM role or user with permissions to perform IPAM and AWS RAM operations in the networking account and the development accounts.
Share your IPAM pool with your Development OU with least privilege permissions
In this section, you share an IPAM pool from your networking account to the accounts in your Development OU and grant least-privilege permissions. To do that, you create a resource share that contains your IPAM pool, your customer managed permission for the IPAM pool, and the OU principal you want to share the IPAM pool with. A resource share contains resources you want to share, the principals you want to share the resources with, and the managed permissions that grant resource access to the account receiving the resources. You can add the IPAM pool to an existing resource share, or you can create a new resource share. Depending on your workflow, you can start creating a resource share either in the Amazon VPC IPAM or in the AWS RAM console.
To initiate a new resource share from the Amazon VPC IPAM console
Next, specify the resource share details, including the name, the resource type, and the specific resource you want to share. Note that the steps of the resource share creation process are located on the left side of the AWS RAM console.
To specify the resource share details
For Name, enter ipam-shared-dev-pool.
For Select resource type, choose IPAM pools.
For Resources, select the Amazon Resource Name (ARN) of the IPAM pool you want to share from a list of the IPAM pool ARNs you own.
Choose Next.
Figure 3: Specify the resources to share in your resource share
Configure customer managed permissions
In this example, the accounts in the Development OU need the permissions required to allocate a CIDR range, but not the permissions to view the IPAM pool details. The existing AWS managed permission grants both read and write permissions. Therefore, you need to create a customer managed permission to refine the resource access permissions for your accounts in the Development OU. With a customer managed permission, you can select and tailor the actions that the development accounts can perform on the IPAM pool, such as write-only actions.
In this section, you create a customer managed permission, configure the managed permission name, select the resource type, and choose the actions that are allowed with the shared resource.
To create and author a customer managed permission
On the Associate managed permissions page, choose Create customer managed permission. This will bring up a new browser tab with a Create a customer managed permission page.
On the Create a customer managed permission page, enter my-ipam-cmp for the Customer managed permission name.
Confirm the Resource type as ec2:IpamPool.
On the Visual editor tab of the Policy template section, select the Write checkbox only. This will automatically check all the available write actions.
Choose Create customer managed permission.
Figure 4: Create a customer managed permission with only write actions
Now that you’ve created your customer managed permission, you must associate it to your resource share.
To associate your customer managed permission
Go back to the previous Associate managed permissions page. This is most likely located in a separate browser tab.
Choose the refresh icon .
Select my-ipam-cmp from the dropdown menu.
Review the policy template, and then choose Next.
Next, select the IAM roles, IAM users, AWS accounts, AWS OUs, or organization you want to share your IPAM pool with. In this example, you share the IPAM pool with an OU in your account.
To grant access to principals
On the Grant access to principals page, select Allow sharing only with your organization.
For Select principal type, choose Organizational unit (OU).
Enter the Development OU’s ID.
Select Add, and then choose Next.
Choose Create resource share to complete creation of your resource share.
Figure 5: Grant access to principals in your resource share
Verify the customer managed permissions
Now let’s verify that the customer managed permission is working as expected. In this section, you verify that the development account cannot view the details of the IPAM pool and that you can use that same account to create a VPC with the IPAM pool.
To verify that an account in your Development OU can’t view the IPAM pool details
Select ipam-shared-dev-pool. You won’t be able to view the IPAM pool details.
To verify that an account in your Development OU can create a new VPC with the IPAM pool
Sign in to the AWS Management Console as an account in your Development OU. For Services, select VPC console.
On the VPC dashboard, choose Create VPC.
On the Create VPC page, select VPC only.
For name, enter my-dev-vpc.
Select IPAM-allocated IPv4 CIDR block.
Choose the ARN of the IPAM pool that’s shared with your development account.
For Netmask, select /24 256 IPs.
Choose Create VPC. You’ve successfully created a VPC with the IPAM pool shared with your account in your Development OU.
Figure 6: Create a VPC
Update customer managed permissions
You can create a new version of your customer managed permission to rescope and update the access granularity of your resources that are shared using AWS RAM. For example, you can add a condition in your customer managed permissions so that only IAM users or roles tagged with a particular principal tag can access and perform the actions allowed on resources shared using AWS RAM. If you need to update your customer managed permission — for example, after testing or as your business and security needs evolve — you can create and save a new version of the same customer managed permission rather than creating an entirely new customer management permission. For example, you might want to adjust your access configurations to read-only actions for your development accounts and to rescope to read-write actions for your testing accounts. The new version of the permission won’t apply automatically to your existing resource shares, and you must explicitly apply it to those shares for it to take effect.
To create a version of your customer managed permission
In the left navigation pane, choose Managed permissions library.
For Filter by text, enter my-ipam-cmp andselect my-ipam-cmp. You can also select the Any type dropdown menu and then select Customer managed to narrow the list of managed permissions to only your customer managed permissions.
On the my-ipam-cmp page, choose Create version.
You can make the customer managed permission more fine-grained by adding a condition. On the Create a customer managed permission for my-ipam-cmp page, under the Policy template section, choose JSON editor.
Add a condition with aws:PrincipalTag that allows only the users or roles tagged with team = networking to access the shared IPAM pool.
Choose Create version. This new version will be automatically set as the default version of your customer managed permission. As a result, new resource shares that use the customer managed permission will use the new version.
Figure 7: Update your customer managed permissions and add a condition statement with aws:PrincipalTag
Note: Now that you have the new version of your customer managed permission, you must explicitly apply it to your existing resource shares for it to take effect.
To apply the new version of the customer managed permission to existing resource shares
On the my-ipam-cmp page, under the Managed permission versions, select Version 1.
Choose the Associated resource shares tab.
Find ipam-shared-dev-pool and next to the current version number, select Update to default version. This will update your ipam-shared-dev-pool resource share with the new version of your my-ipam-cmp customer managed permission.
To verify your updated customer managed permission, see the Verify the customer managed permissions section earlier in this post. Make sure that you sign in with an IAM role or user tagged with team = networking, and then repeat the steps of that section to verify your updated customer managed permission. If you use an IAM role or user that is not tagged with team = networking, you won’t be able to allocate a CIDR from the IPAM pool and you won’t be able to create the VPC.
Cleanup
To remove the resources created by the preceding example:
Delete the resource share from the AWS RAM console.
Deprovision the CIDR from the IPAM pool.
Delete the IPAM pool you created.
Summary
This blog post presented an example of using customer managed permissions in AWS RAM. AWS RAM brings simplicity, consistency, and confidence when sharing your resources across accounts. In the example, you used AWS RAM to share an IPAM pool to accounts in a Development OU, configured fine-grained resource access controls, and followed the best practice of least privilege by granting only the permissions required for the accounts in the Development OU to perform a specific task with the shared IPAM pool. In the example, you also created a new version of your customer managed permission to rescope the access granularity of your resources that are shared using AWS RAM.
The threat detection and incident response track showcased how AWS customers can get the visibility they need to help improve their security posture, identify issues before they impact business, and investigate and respond quickly to security incidents across their environment.
With dozens of service and feature announcements—and innumerable best practices shared by AWS experts, customers, and partners—distilling highlights is a challenge. From an incident response perspective, three key themes emerged.
Proactively detect, contextualize, and visualize security events
When it comes to effectively responding to security events, rapid detection is key. Among the launches announced during the keynote was the expansion of Amazon Detective finding groups to include Amazon Inspector findings in addition to Amazon GuardDuty findings.
Detective, GuardDuty, and Inspector are part of a broad set of fully managed AWS security services that help you identify potential security risks, so that you can respond quickly and confidently.
Using machine learning, Detective finding groups can help you conduct faster investigations, identify the root cause of events, and map to the MITRE ATT&CK framework to quickly run security issues to ground. The finding group visualization panel shown in the following figure displays findings and entities involved in a finding group. This interactive visualization can help you analyze, understand, and triage the impact of finding groups.
Figure 1: Detective finding groups visualization panel
With the expanded threat and vulnerability findings announced at re:Inforce, you can prioritize where to focus your time by answering questions such as “was this EC2 instance compromised because of a software vulnerability?” or “did this GuardDuty finding occur because of unintended network exposure?”
In the session Streamline security analysis with Amazon Detective, AWS Principal Product Manager Rich Vorwaller, AWS Senior Security Engineer Rima Tanash, and AWS Program Manager Jordan Kramer demonstrated how to use graph analysis techniques and machine learning in Detective to identify related findings and resources, and investigate them together to accelerate incident analysis.
In addition to Detective, you can also use Amazon Security Lake to contextualize and visualize security events. Security Lake became generally available on May 30, 2023, and several re:Inforce sessions focused on how you can use this new service to assist with investigations and incident response.
As detailed in the following figure, Security Lake automatically centralizes security data from AWS environments, SaaS providers, on-premises environments, and cloud sources into a purpose-built data lake stored in your account. Security Lake makes it simpler to analyze security data, gain a more comprehensive understanding of security across an entire organization, and improve the protection of workloads, applications, and data. Security Lake automates the collection and management of security data from multiple accounts and AWS Regions, so you can use your preferred analytics tools while retaining complete control and ownership over your security data. Security Lake has adopted the Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework (OCSF), an open standard. With OCSF support, the service normalizes and combines security data from AWS and a broad range of enterprise security data sources.
Figure 2: How Security Lake works
To date, 57 AWS security partners have announced integrations with Security Lake, and we now have more than 70 third-party sources, 16 analytics subscribers, and 13 service partners.
In Gaining insights from Amazon Security Lake, AWS Principal Solutions Architect Mark Keating and AWS Security Engineering Manager Keith Gilbert detailed how to get the most out of Security Lake. Addressing questions such as, “How do I get access to the data?” and “What tools can I use?,” they demonstrated how analytics services and security information and event management (SIEM) solutions can connect to and use data stored within Security Lake to investigate security events and identify trends across an organization. They emphasized how bringing together logs in multiple formats and normalizing them into a single format empowers security teams to gain valuable context from security data, and more effectively respond to events. Data can be queried with Amazon Athena, or pulled by Amazon OpenSearch Service or your SIEM system directly from Security Lake.
Build your security data lake with Amazon Security Lake featured AWS Product Manager Jonathan Garzon, AWS Product Solutions Architect Ross Warren, and Global CISO of Interpublic Group (IPG) Troy Wilkinson demonstrating how Security Lake helps address common challenges associated with analyzing enterprise security data, and detailing how IPG is using the service. Wilkinson noted that IPG’s objective is to bring security data together in one place, improve searches, and gain insights from their data that they haven’t been able to before.
“With Security Lake, we found that it was super simple to bring data in. Not just the third-party data and Amazon data, but also our on-premises data from custom apps that we built.” — Troy Wilkinson, global CISO, Interpublic Group
Use automation and machine learning to reduce mean time to response
Incident response automation can help free security analysts from repetitive tasks, so they can spend their time identifying and addressing high-priority security issues.
LLA operates in over 20 countries across Latin America and the Caribbean. After completing multiple acquisitions, LLA needed a centralized security operations team to handle incidents and notify the teams responsible for each AWS account. They used GuardDuty, Security Hub, and Systems Manager Incident Manager to automate and streamline detection and response, and they configured the services to initiate alerts whenever there was an issue requiring attention.
Speaking alongside AWS Principal Solutions Architect Jesus Federico and AWS Principal Product Manager Sarah Holberg, LLA Senior Manager of Cloud Services Joaquin Cameselle noted that when GuardDuty identifies a critical issue, it generates a new finding in Security Hub. This finding is then forwarded to Systems Manager Incident Manager through an Amazon EventBridge rule. This configuration helps ensure the involvement of the appropriate individuals associated with each account.
“We have deployed a security framework in Liberty Latin America to identify security issues and streamline incident response across over 180 AWS accounts. The framework that leverages AWS Systems Manager Incident Manager, Amazon GuardDuty, and AWS Security Hub enabled us to detect and respond to incidents with greater efficiency. As a result, we have reduced our reaction time by 90%, ensuring prompt engagement of the appropriate teams for each AWS account and facilitating visibility of issues for the central security team.” — Joaquin Cameselle, senior manager, cloud services, Liberty Latin America
After describing the four phases of the incident response process — preparation and prevention; detection and analysis; containment, eradication, and recovery; and post-incident activity—AWS ProServe Global Financial Services Senior Engagement Manager Harikumar Subramonion noted that, to fully benefit from the cloud, you need to embrace automation. Automation benefits the third phase of the incident response process by speeding up containment, and reducing mean time to response.
Citibank Head of Cloud Security Operations Elvis Velez and Vice President of Cloud Security Damien Burks described how Citi built the Cloud Containment Automation Framework (CCAF) from the ground up by using AWS Step Functions and AWS Lambda, enabling them to respond to events 24/7 without human error, and reduce the time it takes to contain resources from 4 hours to 15 minutes. Velez described how Citi uses adversary emulation exercises that use the MITRE ATT&CK Cloud Matrix to simulate realistic attacks on AWS environments, and continuously validate their ability to effectively contain incidents.
Innovate and do more with less
Security operations teams are often understaffed, making it difficult to keep up with alerts. According to data from CyberSeek, there are currently 69 workers available for every 100 cybersecurity job openings.
Effectively evaluating security and compliance posture is critical, despite resource constraints. In Centralizing security at scale with Security Hub and Intuit’s experience, AWS Senior Solutions Architect Craig Simon, AWS Senior Security Hub Product Manager Dora Karali, and Intuit Principal Software Engineer Matt Gravlin discussed how to ease security management with Security Hub. Fortune 500 financial software provider Intuit has approximately 2,000 AWS accounts, 10 million AWS resources, and receives 20 million findings a day from AWS services through Security Hub. Gravlin detailed Intuit’s Automated Compliance Platform (ACP), which combines Security Hub and AWS Config with an internal compliance solution to help Intuit reduce audit timelines, effectively manage remediation, and make compliance more consistent.
“By using Security Hub, we leveraged AWS expertise with their regulatory controls and best practice controls. It helped us keep up to date as new controls are released on a regular basis. We like Security Hub’s aggregation features that consolidate findings from other AWS services and third-party providers. I personally call it the super aggregator. A key component is the Security Hub to Amazon EventBridge integration. This allowed us to stream millions of findings on a daily basis to be inserted into our ACP database.” — Matt Gravlin, principal software engineer, Intuit
At AWS re:Inforce, we launched a new Security Hub capability for automating actions to update findings. You can now use rules to automatically update various fields in findings that match defined criteria. This allows you to automatically suppress findings, update the severity of findings according to organizational policies, change the workflow status of findings, and add notes. With automation rules, Security Hub provides you a simplified way to build automations directly from the Security Hub console and API. This reduces repetitive work for cloud security and DevOps engineers and can reduce mean time to response.
In Continuous innovation in AWS detection and response services, AWS Worldwide Security Specialist Senior Manager Himanshu Verma and GuardDuty Senior Manager Ryan Holland highlighted new features that can help you gain actionable insights that you can use to enhance your overall security posture. After mapping AWS security capabilities to the core functions of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, Verma and Holland provided an overview of AWS threat detection and response services that included a technical demonstration.
Bolstering incident response with AWS Wickr enterprise integrations highlighted how incident responders can collaborate securely during a security event, even on a compromised network. AWS Senior Security Specialist Solutions Architect Wes Wood demonstrated an innovative approach to incident response communications by detailing how you can integrate the end-to-end encrypted collaboration service AWS Wickr Enterprise with GuardDuty and AWS WAF. Using Wickr Bots, you can build integrated workflows that incorporate GuardDuty and third-party findings into a more secure, out-of-band communication channel for dedicated teams.
This blog post is written by Abeer Naffa’, Sr. Solutions Architect, Solutions Builder AWS, David Filiatrault, Principal Security Consultant, and Jared Thompson Hybrid Edge SA Specialist.
In this post, we discuss how you can leverage AWS Control Tower landing zone and AWS Organizations custom policies – guardrails – at the root level, known as Service Control Policies (SCPS) to enable certain data residency requirements on AWS Local Zones. Using the suggested controls lets you limit the ability to store data, process data outside a geographic location, and keep your data within specific Local Zone(s).
Data residency is a critical consideration for organizations that collect and store sensitive information, such as Personal Identifiable Information (PII), financial data, and healthcare data. With the rise of cloud computing and the global nature of the Internet, it can be challenging for organizations to make sure that their data is being stored and processed in compliance with local laws and regulations.
One potential solution for addressing data residency challenges with AWS is utilizing Local Zones, which places AWS infrastructure in large metro areas. This enables organizations to store and process data in specific geographic locations. By using Local Zones, organizations can architect their environment to meet data residency requirements when an AWS Region is unavailable within the same legal jurisdiction. Local Zones can be configured to utilize landing zone to further adhere to data residency requirements.
A landing zone is a well-architected, multi-account AWS environment that is scalable and secure. This is a starting point from which your organization can quickly launch and deploy workloads and applications with confidence in your security and infrastructure environment.
When leveraging a Local Zone to meet data residency requirements, you must have control over the in-scope data movement from the Local Zones to the AWS Region. This can be accomplished by implementing landing zone best practices and the suggested guardrails. The main focus of this post is the custom policies that restrict data snapshots, prohibit data creation within the Region, and limit data transfer to the Region. Furthermore, this post covers which prerequisites organizations should consider before implementing these guardrails.
Prerequisites
Landing zones best practices and custom guardrails can help when data must remain in a specific locality where the Local Zone is also located. This can be completed by defining and enforcing policies for data storage and usage within the landing zone organization that you set up. The following prerequisites should be considered before implementing the suggested guardrails:
You can start using available AWS services on the designated Local Zone directly from the console. Moreover, you can manage the Local Zone using the same tools and interfaces that you use in AWS Region.
2. AWS Control Tower landing zone
AWS Control Tower is a managed service that provides a pre-packaged set of best-practice blueprints for setting up and governing multi-account AWS environments. You must have Control Tower fully implemented in your environment before you can deploy custom guardrails.
Control Tower launches a key resource associated with your account, called a landing zone, which serves as a home for your organizations and their accounts.
Note that Control Tower relies on Organizations to create and manage multi-account structures.
Set up the data residency guardrails
Using Organizations, you must make sure that the Local Zone is enabled within a workload account in the landing zones.
Figure 1: Landing Zones Accelerator – Local Zones workload on AWS high level Architecture
Utilizing Local Zones for regulated components
The availability of Local Zones provides an excellent opportunity to meet data residency requirements and comply with local regulations that restrict the use of the Region outside of your required geo-political boundary. By leveraging Local Zones, organizations can maintain compliance while utilizing AWS services to support their business needs. AWS owns and manages the infrastructure, including hardware, software, and networking for Local Zones. However, as part of the shared responsibility model, customers are responsible for the security of their applications and data, including access control, data encryption, etc.
You must also comply with all applicable regulations and security standards, such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR. You should conduct regular security assessments and implement appropriate security controls to protect their applications and data.
In this post, we consider a scenario where there is a single Local Zones location in a metro. However, you must analyze the specific requirements of your workloads and the relevant regulations that apply to determine the most appropriate high availability configurations for your case.
Local Zones workload data residency guardrails
Organizations provides central governance and management for multiple accounts. Central security administrators use SCPs with Organizations to establish controls to which all AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) principals (users and roles) adhere.
Now you can use SCPs to set permission guardrails. The suggested preventative controls that leverage the implementation of SCPs for data residency on Local Zones are shown in the next paragraph. SCPs let you set permission guardrails by defining the maximum available permissions for IAM entities in an account and all accounts within the Organization root or Organizational Unit (OU). If an SCP denies an action for an account, then none of the entities in any member account, including the member account’s root user, can take that action, even if their IAM permissions let them. The guardrails set in SCPs apply to all IAM entities in the account, which include all users, roles, and the account root user.
Upon finalizing these prerequisites, you can create the guardrails for the chosen OU.
Note that although the following guidelines serve as helpful guardrails – SCPs – for data residency, you should consult internally with legal and security teams for specific organizational requirements.
To exercise better control over the workload in Local Zones and prevent data transfer from Local Zones or data storage outside of the Local Zones, consider implementing the following guardrails:
When your data residency requirements require restricting data transfer/saving to the Region, consider the following guardrails:
As the available services in Local Zones can vary based on location, you must review the services available in the chosen Local Zone and Adjust the SCPs accordingly.
If your data residency requirements mandate restrictions on data storage in the Region, then consider implementing this guardrail to prevent the use of Amazon S3 in the Region.
c. If your data residency requirements mandate restrictions on data storage in the Region, then consider implementing “DenyDirectTransferToRegion”
If your data residency requirements require limitations on data storage in the Region, then consider implementing this guardrail “DenyAllSnapshots” to restrict the use of snapshots in the Region.
Note that the following guardrail restricts the creation of snapshots on AWS Outposts as well. If you’re using Outposts in the same AWS account, then you may need to customize this guardrail to make sure that it aligns with your organization’s specific needs and requirements. For more information on data residency considerations for Outposts, please refer to Architecting for data residency with AWS Outposts rack and landing zone guardrails.
This guardrail helps prevent the launch of EC2 instances or the creation of network interfaces by subnet as opposed to Local Zones You should keep data residency workloads within the Local Zones rather than the Region to make sure of better control over regulated workloads. This approach can help your organization achieve better control over data residency workloads and improve governance over your Organization.
Make sure to update the Local Zones subnets < localzones_subnet_arns>.
When implementing data residency guardrails on Local Zones, consider backup and disaster recovery strategies to make sure that your data is protected in the event of an outage or other unexpected events. This may include creating regular backups of your data, implementing disaster recovery plans and procedures, and using redundancy and failover systems to minimize the impact of any potential disruptions. Additionally, you should make sure that your backup and disaster recovery systems are compliant with any relevant data residency regulations and requirements. You should also test your backup and disaster recovery systems regularly to make sure that they are functioning as intended.
Additionally, the provided SCPs for Local Zones in the above example do not block the “logs:PutLogEvents”. Therefore, even if you implemented data residency guardrails on Local Zones, the application may log data to Amazon CloudWatch Logs in the Region.
Highlights
By default, application-level logs on Local Zones are not automatically sent to CloudWatch Logs in the Region. You can configure CloudWatch Logs agent on Local Zones to collect and send your application-level logs to CloudWatch Logs.
logs:PutLogEvents does transmit data to the Region, but it is not blocked by the provided SCPs, as it’s expected that most use cases still want to be able to use this logging API. However, if blocking is desired, then add the action to the first recommended guardrail. If you want specific roles to be allowed, then combine with the ArnNotLike condition example referenced in the Customization Guide.
Conclusion
The combined use of Local Zones and the suggested guardrails via Organizations policies enables you to exercise better control over the movement of the data. By creating a landing zone for your organization, you can apply SCPs to your Local Zones that will help make sure that your data remains within a specific geographic location, as required by the data residency regulations.
Note that, although custom guardrails can help you manage data residency on Local Zones, it’s critical to thoroughly review your policies, procedures, and configurations. This lets you make sure that they are compliant with all relevant data residency regulations and requirements. Regularly testing and monitoring your systems can help make sure that your data is protected and your organization stays compliant.
This blog post was written by Abeer Naffa’, Sr. Solutions Architect, Solutions Builder AWS, David Filiatrault, Principal Security Consultant, AWS and Jared Thompson, Hybrid Edge SA Specialist, AWS.
In this post, we will explore how organizations can use AWS Control Tower landing zone and AWS Organizations custom guardrails to enable compliance with data residency requirements on AWS Outposts rack. We will discuss how custom guardrails can be leveraged to limit the ability to store, process, and access data and remain isolated in specific geographic locations, how they can be used to enforce security and compliance controls, as well as, which prerequisites organizations should consider before implementing these guardrails.
Data residency is a critical consideration for organizations that collect and store sensitive information, such as Personal Identifiable Information (PII), financial, and healthcare data. With the rise of cloud computing and the global nature of the internet, it can be challenging for organizations to make sure that their data is being stored and processed in compliance with local laws and regulations.
One potential solution for addressing data residency challenges with AWS is to use Outposts rack, which allows organizations to run AWS infrastructure on premises and in their own data centers. This lets organizations store and process data in a location of their choosing. An Outpost is seamlessly connected to an AWS Region where it has access to the full suite of AWS services managed from a single plane of glass, the AWS Management Console or the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI). Outposts rack can be configured to utilize landing zone to further adhere to data residency requirements.
The landing zones are a set of tools and best practices that help organizations establish a secure and compliant multi-account structure within a cloud provider. A landing zone can also include Organizations to set policies – guardrails – at the root level, known as Service Control Policies (SCPs) across all member accounts. This can be configured to enforce certain data residency requirements.
When leveraging Outposts rack to meet data residency requirements, it is crucial to have control over the in-scope data movement from the Outposts. This can be accomplished by implementing landing zone best practices and the suggested guardrails. The main focus of this blog post is on the custom policies that restrict data snapshots, prohibit data creation within the Region, and limit data transfer to the Region.
Prerequisites
Landing zone best practices and custom guardrails can help when data needs to remain in a specific locality where the Outposts rack is also located. This can be completed by defining and enforcing policies for data storage and usage within the landing zone organization that you set up. The following prerequisites should be considered before implementing the suggested guardrails:
1. AWS Outposts rack
AWS has installed your Outpost and handed off to you. An Outpost may comprise of one or more racks connected together at the site. This means that you can start using AWS services on the Outpost, and you can manage the Outposts rack using the same tools and interfaces that you use in AWS Regions.
2. Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS
We recommend using Landing Zone Accelerator on AWS (LZA) to deploy a landing zone for your organization. Make sure that the accelerator is configured for the appropriate Region and industry. To do this, you must meet the following prerequisites:
A clear understanding of your organization’s compliance requirements, including the specific Region and industry rules in which you operate.
Knowledge of the different LZAs available and their capabilities, such as the compliance frameworks with which you align.
Have the necessary permissions to deploy the LZAs and configure it for your organization’s specific requirements.
Note that LZAs are designed to help organizations quickly set up a secure, compliant multi-account environment. However, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution, and you must align it with your organization’s specific requirements.
3. Set up the data residency guardrails
Using Organizations, you must make sure that the Outpost is ordered within a workload account in the landing zone.
Figure 1: Landing Zone Accelerator – Outposts workload on AWS high level Architecture
Utilizing Outposts rack for regulated components
When local regulations require regulated workloads to stay within a specific boundary, or when an AWS Region or AWS Local Zone isn’t available in your jurisdiction, you can still choose to host your regulated workloads on Outposts rack for a consistent cloud experience. When opting for Outposts rack, note that, as part of the shared responsibility model, customers are responsible for attesting to physical security, access controls, and compliance validation regarding the Outposts, as well as, environmental requirements for the facility, networking, and power. Utilizing Outposts rack requires that you procure and manage the data center within the city, state, province, or country boundary for your applications’ regulated components, as required by local regulations.
Procuring two or more racks in the diverse data centers can help with the high availability for your workloads. This is because it provides redundancy in case of a single rack or server failure. Additionally, having redundant network paths between Outposts rack and the parent Region can help make sure that your application remains connected and continue to operate even if one network path fails.
However, for regulated workloads with strict service level agreements (SLA), you may choose to spread Outposts racks across two or more isolated data centers within regulated boundaries. This helps make sure that your data remains within the designated geographical location and meets local data residency requirements.
In this post, we consider a scenario with one data center, but consider the specific requirements of your workloads and the regulations that apply to determine the most appropriate high availability configurations for your case.
Outposts rack workload data residency guardrails
Organizations provide central governance and management for multiple accounts. Central security administrators use SCPs with Organizations to establish controls to which all AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) principals (users and roles) adhere.
Now, you can use SCPs to set permission guardrails. A suggested preventative controls for data residency on Outposts rack that leverage the implementation of SCPs are shown as follows. SCPs enable you to set permission guardrails by defining the maximum available permissions for IAM entities in an account. If an SCP denies an action for an account, then none of the entities in the account can take that action, even if their IAM permissions let them. The guardrails set in SCPs apply to all IAM entities in the account, which include all users, roles, and the account root user.
Upon finalizing these prerequisites, you can create the guardrails for the Outposts Organization Unit (OU).
Note that while the following guidelines serve as helpful guardrails – SCPs – for data residency, you should consult internally with legal and security teams for specific organizational requirements.
To exercise better control over workloads in the Outposts rack and prevent data transfer from Outposts to the Region or data storage outside the Outposts, consider implementing the following guardrails. Additionally, local regulations may dictate that you set up these additional guardrails.
When your data residency requirements require restricting data transfer/saving to the Region, consider the following guardrails:
If your data residency requirements mandate restrictions on data storage in the Region, consider implementing this guardrail to prevent the use of S3 in the Region.
c. If your data residency requirements mandate restrictions on data storage in the Region, consider implementing “DenyDirectTransferToRegion” guardrail.
Out of Scope is metadata such as tags, or operational data such as KMS keys.
If your data residency requirements require limitations on data storage in the Region, consider implementing this guardrail “DenySnapshotsToRegion” and “DenySnapshotsNotOutposts” to restrict the use of snapshots in the Region.
a. Deny creating snapshots of your Outpost data in the Region “DenySnapshotsToRegion”
Make sure to update the Outposts “<outpost_arn_pattern>”.
b. Deny copying or modifying Outposts Snapshots “DenySnapshotsNotOutposts”
Make sure to update the Outposts “<outpost_arn_pattern>”.
Note: “<outpost_arn_pattern>” default is arn:aws:outposts:*:*:outpost/*
This guardrail helps to prevent the launch of Amazon EC2 instances or creation of network interfaces in non-Outposts subnets. It is advisable to keep data residency workloads within the Outposts rather than the Region to ensure better control over regulated workloads. This approach can help your organization achieve better control over data residency workloads and improve governance over your AWS Organization.
Make sure to update the Outposts subnets “<outpost_subnet_arns>”.
When implementing data residency guardrails on Outposts rack, consider backup and disaster recovery strategies to make sure that your data is protected in the event of an outage or other unexpected events. This may include creating regular backups of your data, implementing disaster recovery plans and procedures, and using redundancy and failover systems to minimize the impact of any potential disruptions. Additionally, you should make sure that your backup and disaster recovery systems are compliant with any relevant data residency regulations and requirements. You should also test your backup and disaster recovery systems regularly to make sure that they are functioning as intended.
Additionally, the provided SCPs for Outposts rack in the above example do not block the “logs:PutLogEvents”. Therefore, even if you implemented data residency guardrails on Outpost, the application may log data to CloudWatch logs in the Region.
Highlights
By default, application-level logs on Outposts rack are not automatically sent to Amazon CloudWatch Logs in the Region. You can configure CloudWatch logs agent on Outposts rack to collect and send your application-level logs to CloudWatch logs.
logs: PutLogEvents does transmit data to the Region, but it is not blocked by the provided SCPs, as it’s expected that most use cases will still want to be able to use this logging API. However, if blocking is desired, then add the action to the first recommended guardrail. If you want specific roles to be allowed, then combine with the ArnNotLike condition example referenced in the previous highlight.
Conclusion
The combined use of Outposts rack and the suggested guardrails via AWS Organizations policies enables you to exercise better control over the movement of the data. By creating a landing zone for your organization, you can apply SCPs to your Outposts racks that will help make sure that your data remains within a specific geographic location, as required by the data residency regulations.
Note that, while custom guardrails can help you manage data residency on Outposts rack, it’s critical to thoroughly review your policies, procedures, and configurations to make sure that they are compliant with all relevant data residency regulations and requirements. Regularly testing and monitoring your systems can help make sure that your data is protected and your organization stays compliant.
As we kick off 2023, I wanted to take a moment to highlight the top posts from 2022. Without further ado, here are the top 10 AWS DevOps Blog posts of 2022.
Sylvia Qi, Senior DevOps Architect, and Sebastian Carreras, Senior Cloud Application Architect, guide us through utilizing infrastructure as code (IaC) to automate GitLab Runner deployment on Amazon EC2.
Lerna Ekmekcioglu, Senior Solutions Architect, and Jack Iu, Global Solutions Architect, demonstrate best practices for multi-Region deployments using HashiCorp Terraform, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodePipeline.
Praveen Kumar Jeyarajan, Senior DevOps Consultant, and Vaidyanathan Ganesa Sankaran, Sr Modernization Architect, discuss unit testing Python-based AWS Glue Jobs in AWS CodePipeline.
James Bland, APN Global Tech Lead for DevOps, and Welly Siauw, Sr. Partner solutions architect, discuss the challenges of architecting Jenkins for scale and high availability (HA).
Harish Vaswani, Senior Cloud Application Architect, and Rafael Ramos, Solutions Architect, explain how you can configure and use tfdevops to easily enable Amazon DevOps Guru for your existing AWS resources created by Terraform.
Arun Donti, Senior Software Engineer with Twitch, demonstrates how to integrate cdk-nag into an AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) application to provide continual feedback and help align your applications with best practices.
Adam Thomas, Senior Software Development Engineer, demonstrate how you can use Smithy to define services and SDKs and deploy them to AWS Lambda using a generated client.
A big thank you to all our readers! Your feedback and collaboration are appreciated and help us produce better content.
AWS recently announced that AWS Organizations now supports AWS CloudFormation. This feature allows you to create and update AWS accounts, organizational units (OUs), and policies within your organization by using CloudFormation templates. With this latest integration, you can efficiently codify and automate the deployment of your resources in AWS Organizations.
You can now manage your AWS organization resources using infrastructure as code (iaC) and make changes in a central place. This can help reduce the time required to build a new organization, expand or modify the existing organization, replicate your organization infrastructure, or apply and update policies across multiple accounts and OUs. You can also delete organization resources by deleting the stacks.
In this blog post, we will show you how to create various AWS Organizations resources for a multi-account organization by using a CloudFormation template.
How does it work?
A CloudFormation template describes your desired resources and their dependencies so that you can launch and configure them together as a stack. You can use a template to create, update, and delete an entire stack as a single unit instead of managing resources individually.
With CloudFormation support for AWS Organizations, you can now do the following:
Create, delete, or update an organizational unit (OU). An OU is a container for accounts that allows you to organize your accounts to apply policies according to your needs.
Create accounts in your organization, add tags, and attach them to OUs.
Add or remove a tag on an OU.
Create, delete, or update a service control policy (SCP), backup policy, tag policy and artificial intelligence (AI) services opt-out policy.
Add or remove a tag on an SCP, backup policy, tag policy, and AI services opt-out policy.
Attach or detach an SCP, backup policy, tag policy, and AI services opt-out policy to a target (root, OU, or account).
To create AWS Organizations resources using CloudFormation, you will need to use your organization’s management account. As of this writing, the new resource types may only be deployed from the organization’s management account or delegated administration account.
Overview of the new resource types
The following are the three new resource types available for the implementation and management of an account, OU, and organizations policy in CloudFormation:
AWS::Organizations::Account – Creates an account that is automatically a member of the organization whose credentials made the request.
AWS::Organizations::Policy – Creates a policy of a specified type that you can attach to a root, OU, or individual account.
Prerequisites
This blog post assumes that you have AWS Organizations enabled in your management account. You also need the tag policy and service control policy types enabled in your management account. For instructions on how to create an organization, see Create your organization.
You should also review the following important points for creating resources in AWS Organizations:
AWS Organizations supports the creation of a single account at a time. If you include multiple accounts in a single CloudFormation template, you should use the DependsOn attribute so that your accounts are created sequentially.
Before you can create a policy of a given type, you must first enable that policy type in your organization.
The number of levels deep that you can nest OUs depends on the policy types that you have enabled for the root. For SCPs, the limit is five.
To modify the AccountName, Email, and RoleName for the account resource parameters, you must sign in to the AWS Management Console as the AWS account root user.
Since the CloudFormation template in this blog deploys Account and Organization Unit resources, you must deploy it in your organization’s management account.
Use a CloudFormation template with the new AWS Organizations resources
In this section, we will walk you through a sample CloudFormation template that incorporates the newly supported AWS Organizations resources. CloudFormation provisions and configures the resources for you, so that you don’t have to individually create and configure them and determine resource dependencies.
The template will create the following resources and structure.
Three organizational units
Infrastructure – Within the organizational root
Production – Within the Infrastructure OU
Security – Within the organizational root
One account
AccountA – Within the Production child OU
Two service control policies
PreventLeavingOrganization – Attached to the organizational root
PreventCloudTrailDisablement – Attached to the Security OU
Note: The above OU and account layout is only an example for the purpose of this blog post. Please refer to Organizing Your AWS Environment Using Multiple Accounts whitepaper for more information on multi-account strategy best practices & recommendations.
In this section, you will create a stack by using the CloudFormation template that you downloaded.
To create the stack
Create the AWS Organizations resources outlined in the template by creating an IAM role for CloudFormation using the following IAM permissions policy and trust policy.
Sign in to the management account for your organization, navigate to the CloudFormation console, and choose Create stack.
Choose With new resources (standard), upload the template file, and choose Next.
Figure 1: CloudFormation console showing creation of stack
Enter a name for the stack (for example, CloudFormationForAWSOrganizations). For OrganizationRoot, enter your organizations root ID. You can find the root ID in the AWS Organizations console.
Choose Create stack.
On the Configure stack options page, in the Permissions section, choose the IAM role that you granted permissions to previously, as shown in Figure 2. Then choose Next.
Figure 2: Set IAM role permissions for CloudFormation
You will see a screen showing stack creation in progress.
Figure 3: CloudFormation console showing stack creation in progress
When the stack has been created, choose the Resources tab to see the resources created.
Figure 4: CloudFormation console showing stack resources created
Confirm and visualize the resources created by using the console
In this section, you will use the console to confirm and visualize the resources created.
In the left navigation pane, choose AWS accounts to see the OUs and account that were created.
Figure 5: AWS Organizations console showing the organization structure
Confirm the service control policy created and attached to the organization’s root
In this section, you will confirm that the SCP was created and attached to the organization’s root.
Note: When you enable SCPs on an organization, an AWS full access policy is attached by default at each level (root, OU, and account) of your organization. Because you can attach policies to multiple levels of the organization, accounts can inherit multiple policies with an effect of deny. For more details, see inheritance for service control policies.
To confirm the SCP was created and attached to the root
To view the service control policy, choose Root, and then in the section Applied policies, review the list of policies. The PreventLeavingOrganization SCP prevents the use of the LeaveOrganization API so that member accounts can’t remove their accounts from the organization.
Figure 6: AWS Organizations console showing the organization’s root
To confirm that the DoNotDelete tag was attached to the PreventLeavingOrganization SCP, choose the policy name and then choose the Tags tab.
Figure 7: SCP with tags attached to it in Organizations
Confirm the service control policy created and attached to the Security OU
In this section, you will confirm that the PreventCloudTrailDisablement SCP was created and attached to the Security OU, thus preventing users or roles in the accounts in the security OU from disabling an AWS CloudTrail log.
To confirm that the SCP was created and attached to the Security OU
From the left navigation pane, choose AWS accounts, and then choose Security.
On the Security page, choose the Policies tab to see a list of policies.
To review and confirm the contents of the policy, choose PreventCloudTrailDisablement.
Figure 8: SCP attached to the Security OU in Organizations
Confirm the account and tag policy created and attached to the Production OU
In this step, you will confirm that the account and tag policy were created and attached to the Production OU.
To confirm creation of the account and tag policy in the Production OU
On the Production page, choose the Children tab to confirm that the account named AccountA was created.
Figure 9: The Production OU and account A in Organizations
To confirm that the DefineTagKeyCase tag policy was attached to the Production OU, do the following:
From the left navigation pane, choose AWS accounts, and then choose Production.
Choose the Policies tab to see the list of policies.
In the Tag policies section, under Applied policies, choose DefineTagKeyCase to confirm the contents of the policy. This policy defines the tag key and the capitalization that you want accounts in the production OU to standardize on.
Figure 10: SCP and tag policy attached to the Production OU in Organizations
Conclusion
In this blog post, you learned how to create AWS Organizations resources, including organizational units, accounts, service control policies, and tag policies by using CloudFormation. You can use this new feature to model the state of your infrastructure as code and to help deploy your AWS resources in a safe, repeatable manner at scale.
A new week starts, and the News Blog team is getting ready for AWS re:Invent! Many of us will be there next week and it would be great to meet in person. If you’re coming, do you know about PeerTalk? It’s an onsite networking program for re:Invent attendees available through the AWS Events mobile app (which you can get on Google Play or Apple App Store) to help facilitate connections among the re:Invent community.
Amazon EventBridge – With these additional filtering capabilities, you can now filter events by suffix, ignore case, and match if at least one condition is true. This makes it easier to write complex rules when building event-driven applications.
AWS Controllers for Kubernetes (ACK) – The ACK for Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is now generally available and lets you provision and manage EC2 networking resources, such as VPCs, security groups and internet gateways using the Kubernetes API. Also, the ACK for Amazon EMR on EKS is now generally available to allow you to declaratively define and manage EMR on EKS resources such as virtual clusters and job runs as Kubernetes custom resources. Learn more about ACK for Amazon EMR on EKS in this blog post.
Amazon HealthLake – New analytics capabilities make it easier to query, visualize, and build machine learning (ML) models. Now HealthLake transforms customer data into an analytics-ready format in near real-time so that you can query, and use the resulting data to build visualizations or ML models. Also new is Amazon HealthLake Imaging (preview), a new HIPAA-eligible capability that enables you to easily store, access, and analyze medical images at any scale. More on HealthLake Imaging can be found in this blog post.
Amazon RDS – You can now transfer files betweenAmazon Relational Database Service (RDS) for Oracle and an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system. You can use this integration to stage files like Oracle Data Pump export files when you import them. You can also use EFS to share a file system between an application and one or more RDS Oracle DB instances to address specific application needs.
AWS Fargate – Adds the ability to monitor the utilization of the ephemeral storage attached to an Amazon ECS task. You can track the storage utilization with Amazon CloudWatch Container Insights and ECS Task Metadata endpoint.
Amazon ElastiCache – You can now use IAM authentication to access Redis clusters. With this new capability, IAM users and roles can be associated with ElastiCache for Redis users to manage their cluster access.
Amazon CloudWatch RUM – You can now send custom events (in addition to predefined events) for better troubleshooting and application specific monitoring. In this way, you can monitor specific functions of your application and troubleshoot end user impacting issues unique to the application components.
AWS AppSync – You can now define GraphQL API resolvers using JavaScript. You can also mix functions written in JavaScript and Velocity Template Language (VTL) inside a single pipeline resolver. To simplify local development of resolvers, AppSync released two new NPM libraries and a new API command. More info can be found in this blog post.
AWS Console – With the new Applications widget on the Console home, you have one-click access to applications in AWS Systems Manager Application Manager and their resources, code, and related data. From Application Manager, you can view the resources that power your application and your costs using AWS Cost Explorer.
Other AWS News A few more stuff you might have missed:
Introducing our final AWS Heroes of the year – As the end of 2022 approaches, we are recognizing individuals whose enthusiasm for knowledge-sharing has a real impact with the AWS community. Please meet them here!
The Distributed Computing Manifesto – Werner Vogles, VP & CTO at Amazon.com, shared the Distributed Computing Manifesto, a canonical document from the early days of Amazon that transformed the way we built architectures and highlights the challenges faced at the end of the 20th century.
AWS re:Post – To make this community more accessible globally, we expanded the user experience to support five additional languages. You can now interact with AWS re:Post also using Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese, French, Japanese, and Korean.
For AWS open-source news and updates, here’s the latest newsletter curated by Ricardo to bring you the most recent updates on open-source projects, posts, events, and more.
Upcoming AWS Events As usual, there are many opportunities to meet:
That’s all from me for this week. Next week we’ll focus on re:Invent, and then we’ll take a short break. We’ll be back with the next Week in Review on December 12!
When building serverless applications using AWS Lambda, there are a number of considerations regarding security, governance, and compliance. This post highlights how Lambda, as a serverless service, simplifies cloud security and compliance so you can concentrate on your business logic. It covers controls that you can implement for your Lambda workloads to ensure that your applications conform to your organizational requirements.
The Shared Responsibility Model
The AWS Shared Responsibility Model distinguishes between what AWS is responsible for and what customers are responsible for with cloud workloads. AWS is responsible for “Security of the Cloud” where AWS protects the infrastructure that runs all the services offered in the AWS Cloud. Customers are responsible for “Security in the Cloud”, managing and securing their workloads. When building traditional applications, you take on responsibility for many infrastructure services, including operating systems and network configuration.
Traditional application shared responsibility
One major benefit when building serverless applications is shifting more responsibility to AWS so you can concentrate on your business applications. AWS handles managing and patching the underlying servers, operating systems, and networking as part of running the services.
Serverless application shared responsibility
For Lambda, AWS manages the application platform where your code runs, which includes patching and updating the managed language runtimes. This reduces the attack surface while making cloud security simpler. You are responsible for the security of your code and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to the Lambda service and within your function.
Lambda functions run in separate isolated AWS accounts that are dedicated to the Lambda service. Lambda invokes your code in a secure and isolated runtime environment within the Lambda service account. A runtime environment is a collection of resources running in a dedicated hardware-virtualized Micro Virtual Machines (MVM) on a Lambda worker node.
Lambda workers are bare metalEC2 Nitro instances, which are managed and patched by the Lambda service team. They have a maximum lease lifetime of 14 hours to keep the underlying infrastructure secure and fresh. MVMs are created by Firecracker, an open source virtual machine monitor (VMM) that uses Linux’s Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) to create and manage MVMs securely at scale.
MVMs maintain a strong separation between runtime environments at the virtual machine hardware level, which increases security. Runtime environments are never reused across functions, function versions, or AWS accounts.
Isolation model for AWS Lambda workers
Network security
Lambda functions always run inside secure Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPCs) owned by the Lambda service. This gives the Lambda function access to AWS services and the public internet. There is no direct network inbound access to Lambda workers, runtime environments, or Lambda functions. All inbound access to a Lambda function only comes via the Lambda Invoke API, which sends the event object to the function handler.
You can configure a Lambda function to connect to private subnets in a VPC in your account if necessary, which you can control with IAM condition keys . The Lambda function still runs inside the Lambda service VPC but sends all network traffic through your VPC. Function outbound traffic comes from your own network address space.
AWS Lambda service VPC with VPC-to-VPC NAT to customer VPC
To give your VPC-connected function access to the internet, route outbound traffic to a NAT gateway in a public subnet. Connecting a function to a public subnet doesn’t give it internet access or a public IP address, as the function is still running in the Lambda service VPC and then routing network traffic into your VPC.
All internal AWS traffic uses the AWS Global Backbone rather than traversing the internet. You do not need to connect your functions to a VPC to avoid connectivity to AWS services over the internet. VPC connected functions allow you to control and audit outbound network access.
You can use security groups to control outbound traffic for VPC-connected functions and network ACLs to block access to CIDR IP ranges or ports. VPC endpoints allow you to enable private communications with supported AWS services without internet access.
You can use VPC Flow Logs to audit traffic going to and from network interfaces in your VPC.
Runtime environment re-use
Each runtime environment processes a single request at a time. After Lambda finishes processing the request, the runtime environment is ready to process an additional request for the same function version. For more information on how Lambda manages runtime environments, see Understanding AWS Lambda scaling and throughput.
Data can persist in the local temporary filesystem path, in globally scoped variables, and in environment variables across subsequent invocations of the same function version. Ensure that you only handle sensitive information within individual invocations of the function by processing it in the function handler, or using local variables. Do not re-use files in the local temporary filesystem to process unencrypted sensitive data. Do not put sensitive or confidential information into Lambda environment variables, tags, or other freeform fields such as Name fields.
AWS recommends using multiple accounts to isolate your resources because they provide natural boundaries for security, access, and billing. Use AWS Organizations to manage and govern individual member accounts centrally. You can use AWS Control Tower to automate many of the account build steps and apply managed guardrails to govern your environment. These include preventative guardrails to limit actions and detective guardrails to detect and alert on non-compliance resources for remediation.
Lambda access controls
Lambda permissions define what a Lambda function can do, and who or what can invoke the function. Consider the following areas when applying access controls to your Lambda functions to ensure least privilege:
Execution role
Lambda functions have permission to access other AWS resources using execution roles. This is an AWS principal that the Lambda service assumes which grants permissions using identity policy statements assigned to the role. The Lambda service uses this role to fetch and cache temporary security credentials, which are then available as environment variables during a function’s invocation. It may re-use them across different runtime environments that use the same execution role.
Ensure that each function has its own unique role with the minimum set of permissions..
Identity/user policies
IAM identity policies are attached to IAM users, groups, or roles. These policies allow users or callers to perform operations on Lambda functions. You can restrict who can create functions, or control what functions particular users can manage.
Resource policies
Resource policies define what identities have fine-grained inbound access to managed services. For example, you can restrict which Lambda function versions can add events to a specific Amazon EventBridge event bus. You can use resource-based policies on Lambda resources to control what AWS IAM identities and event sources can invoke a specific version or alias of your function. You also use a resource-based policy to allow an AWS service to invoke your function on your behalf. To see which services support resource-based policies, see “AWS services that work with IAM”.
Attribute-based access control (ABAC)
With attribute-based access control (ABAC), you can use tags to control access to your Lambda functions. With ABAC, you can scale an access control strategy by setting granular permissions with tags without requiring permissions updates for every new user or resource as your organization scales. You can also use tag policies with AWS Organizations to standardize tags across resources.
Permissions boundaries
Permissions boundaries are a way to delegate permission management safely. The boundary places a limit on the maximum permissions that a policy can grant. For example, you can use boundary permissions to limit the scope of the execution role to allow only read access to databases. A builder with permission to manage a function or with write access to the applications code repository cannot escalate the permissions beyond the boundary to allow write access.
Service control policies
When using AWS Organizations, you can use Service control policies (SCPs) to manage permissions in your organization. These provide guardrails for what actions IAM users and roles within the organization root or OUs can do. For more information, see the AWS Organizations documentation, which includes example service control policies.
Code signing
As you are responsible for the code that runs in your Lambda functions, you can ensure that only trusted code runs by using code signing with the AWS Signer service. AWS Signer digitally signs your code packages and Lambda validates the code package before accepting the deployment, which can be part of your automated software deployment process.
Auditing Lambda configuration, permissions and access
You should audit access and permissions regularly to ensure that your workloads are secure. Use the IAM console to view when an IAM role was last used.
IAM last used
IAM access advisor
Use IAM access advisor on the Access Advisor tab in the IAM console to review when was the last time an AWS service was used from a specific IAM user or role. You can use this to remove IAM policies and access from your IAM roles.
You can validate policies using IAM Access Analyzer, which provides over 100 policy checks with security warnings for overly permissive policies. To learn more about policy checks provided by IAM Access Analyzer, see “IAM Access Analyzer policy validation”.
You can also generate IAM policies based on access activity from CloudTrail logs, which contain the permissions that the role used in your specified date range.
IAM Access Analyzer
AWS Config
AWS Config provides you with a record of the configuration history of your AWS resources. AWS Config monitors the resource configuration and includes rules to alert when they fall into a non-compliant state.
For Lambda, you can track and alert on changes to your function configuration, along with the IAM execution role. This allows you to gather Lambda function lifecycle data for potential audit and compliance requirements. For more information, see the Lambda Operators Guide.
Lambda makes cloud security simpler by taking on more responsibility using the AWS Shared Responsibility Model. Lambda implements strict workload security at scale to isolate your code and prevent network intrusion to your functions. This post provides guidance on assessing and implementing best practices and tools for Lambda to improve your security, governance, and compliance controls. These include permissions, access controls, multiple accounts, and code security. Learn how to audit your function permissions, configuration, and access to ensure that your applications conform to your organizational requirements.
For more serverless learning resources, visit Serverless Land.
United States Automobile Association (USAA) is a San Antonio-based insurance, financial services, banking, and FinTech company supporting millions of military members and their families. USAA has partnered with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to digitally transform and build multiple USAA solutions that help keep members safe and save members’ money and time.
Why build an AWS account metadata solution?
The USAA Cloud Program developed a centralized solution for collecting all AWS account metadata to facilitate core enterprise functions, such as financial management, remediation of vulnerable and insecure configurations, and change release processes for critical application and infrastructure changes.
Companies without centralized metadata solutions may have distributed documents and wikis that contain account metadata, which has to be updated manually. Manually inputting/updating information generally leads to outdated or incorrect metadata and, in addition, requires individuals to reach out to multiple resources and teams to collect specific information.
Solution overview
USAA utilizes AWS Organizations and a series of GitLab projects to create, manage, and baseline all AWS accounts and infrastructure within the organization, including identity and access management, security, and networking components. Within their GitLab projects, each deployment uses a GitLab baseline version that determines what version of the project was provisioned within the AWS account.
During the creation and onboarding of new AWS accounts, which are created for each application team and use-case, there is specific data that is used for tracking and governance purposes, and applied across the enterprise. USAA’s Public Cloud Security team took an opportunity within a hackathon event to develop the solution depicted in Figure 1.
AWS account is created conforming to a naming convention and added to AWS Organizations.
Step Functions invoke an AWS Lambda function to pull AWS account metadata and load into a centralized Amazon DynamoDB table with Streams enabled to support automation.
A private Amazon API Gateway is exposed to USAA’s internal network, which queries the DynamoDB table and provides AWS account metadata.
Figure 1. Overview of USAA architecture automation workflow to manage AWS account metadata
After the solution was deployed, USAA teams leveraged the data in multiple ways:
User interface: a front-end user-interface querying the API Gateway to allow internal users on the USAA network to filter and view metadata for any AWS accounts within AWS Organizations.
Event-driven automation: DynamoDB streams for any changes in the table that would invoke a Lambda function, which would check the most recent version from GitLab and the GitLab baseline version in the AWS account. For any outdated deployments, the Lambda function invokes the CI/CD pipeline for that AWS account to deploy a standardized set of IAM, infrastructure, and security resources and configurations.
Incident response: the Cyber Threat Response team reduces mean-time-to-respond by developing automation to query the API Gateway to append points-of-contact, environment, and AWS account name for custom detections as well as Security Hub and Amazon GuardDuty findings.
Financial management: Internal teams have integrated workflows to their applications to query the API Gateway to return cost center, LOB, and application ID to assist with financial reporting and tracking purposes. This replaces manually reviewing the AWS account metadata from an internal and manually updated wiki page.
Compliance and vulnerability management: automated notification systems were developed to send consolidated reports to points-of-contact listed in the AWS account from the API Gateway to remediate non-compliant resources and configurations.
Conclusion
In this post, we reviewed how USAA enabled core enterprise functions and teams to collect, store, and distribute AWS account metadata by developing a secure and highly scalable serverless application natively in AWS. The solution has been leveraged for multiple use-cases, including internal application teams in USAA’s production AWS environment.
In this blog post, we present a lifecycle that helps you build, validate, and improve your own AWS Well-Architected Custom Lens, in order to roll it out across your whole organization. The AWS Well-Architected Custom Lens is a new feature of the AWS Well-Architected Tool that lets you bring your own best practices to complement the existing Well-Architected Framework.
The Custom Lens lifecycle: how a Custom Lens can benefit your organization
Figure 1. The AWS Well-Architected Custom Lens lifecycle
Each organization has its own requirements, processes, best practices, and tools, but the information can be spread over many systems and knowledge bases. A Custom Lens can capture the specifics of a working environment and let coworkers access this information in a single place—from the AWS console—without the need to go to a separate tool. A Custom Lens can be created in a central management account and securely shared with other accounts.
A Custom Lens can be updated periodically as either a major or minor version. If it is a minor version, the change is automatically applied to all accounts that the lens has been shared with. If it is a major version, the user has to accept the updated Custom Lens and a summary of the changes is displayed to the user. Accepting the changes then applies the update for existing workload reviews, and prompts the user to review the workload. Thus, updating a Custom Lens is an effective mechanism to continuously inform teams about new best practices.
In addition, maintaining and improving a Custom Lens continuously helps to identify gaps in organization-wide tooling, guidance, or documentation. You can aggregate feedback and metrics from reviews that have been performed and use it to drive the improvement process of the content. More importantly, the gathered metrics help measure the overall adherence to best practices and requirements in your organization. If you focus on creating clear, concise, and actionable content for your Custom Lens, the time needed to identify and implement improvements is reduced. As teams realize the value of the Custom Lens, more reviews will be performed, and you will receive more data to construct a comprehensive view.
1. Plan
The Plan phase identifies the benefits that a Custom Lens can provide your organization by identifying current gaps. You also define the scope of your Custom Lens, which is the type of content that supports your desired business outcomes. Depending on the scope, you need to identify the appropriate stakeholders and gain support for the initiative.
2. Implement
In the Implement phase, content is created for the Custom Lens with a working group. While doing this, you can identify missing supplementary artefacts, like documentation or tooling. If that is the case, you can create these artefacts and link to them from the Custom Lens Improvement Plan.
As part of the implementation, the Custom Lens is created by uploading a JSON file in the appropriate format to a central management account, then, sharing the lens with the organization’s AWS accounts. You can share the Custom Lens with IAM Principals, such as users, roles, and AWS accounts. For broader and more efficient sharing, you now have the ability to scale by sharing your Custom Lens with individual organizational units or the entire AWS Organizations. This feature reduces management overhead and removes the need for a custom automation.
3. Measure
The Measure phase aggregates feedback and metrics from reviews that have been performed with your Custom Lens; this information is used to drive the improvement process.
The Well-Architected Tool offers a way to share workload reviews, and you can use this to share all reviews with a central AWS account. You can then analyze the reviews in the central account by extracting the data and analyzing it, for example, by building a dashboard. The Well-Architected Lab for building custom reports provides a solution that can be implemented.
4. Improve
In the Improve phase, the gathered metrics and feedback are used to identify areas for future improvement. For example, you might find common gaps among the performed workload reviews, where the same best practices are not fulfilled. When you investigate the root cause, you can learn that the existing content lacks clarity or that the suggested tools are difficult to use.
In addition, improvements, such as content gaps that were not addressed during the first iteration of the Custom Lens, can be added to the backlog before you repeat the cycle.
To roll out changes of your Custom Lens in an automated and repeatable fashion, you can implement the architecture depicted in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Combining AWS CodeCommit with AWS Lambda to update your Custom Lens whenever a file change is pushed to the code repository
This architecture enables automated releases of new versions of your Custom Lens whenever you commit an updated JSON file to the code repository. In detail, the steps are:
The JSON file of your Custom Lens is stored in an AWS CodeCommit repository. An author pushes an updated version of the file to the repository.
The CodeCommit repository is configured with a trigger action that invokes an AWS Lambda function on each commit.
The Lambda function downloads the updated file by using the GetFile API of CodeCommit. Then, the Lambda function imports the updated Custom Lens and publishes it as a new version by using ImportLens and CreateLensVersion APIs of the AWS Well-Architected Tool, then shares the Custom Lens using CreateLensShare.
The updated Custom Lens is available in all accounts that the lens has been shared with.
Reviewers can create new workload reviews with the Custom Lens or upgrade to the newest version for existing workload reviews.
Conclusion
In this blog post, we walked you through the Custom Lens lifecycle, a process to create and continuously improve a Custom Lens for your organization. If you have a special software development lifecycle, a customized security and compliance framework, or other highly specific requirements or best practices that you want disseminated and measurable, learn more about how to create a Custom Lens in the Well-Architected Tool.
AWS Well-Architected is a set of guiding design principles developed by AWS to help organizations build secure, high-performing, resilient, and efficient infrastructure for a variety of applications and workloads. Use the AWS Well-Architected Tool to review your workloads periodically to address important design considerations and ensure that they follow the best practices and guidance of the AWS Well-Architected Framework. For follow up questions or comments, join our growing community on AWS re:Post.
In Part 1 of this two-part series, we shared an overview of some of the most important 2021 Amazon Web Services (AWS) Security service and feature launches. In this follow-up, we’ll dive deep into additional launches that are important for security professionals to be aware of and understand across all AWS services. There have already been plenty in the first half of 2022, so we’ll highlight those soon, as well.
AWS Identity
You can use AWS Identity Services to build Zero Trust architectures, help secure your environments with a robust data perimeter, and work toward the security best practice of granting least privilege. In 2021, AWS expanded the identity source options, AWS Region availability, and support for AWS services. There is also added visibility and power in the permission management system. New features offer new integrations, additional policy checks, and secure resource sharing across AWS accounts.
AWS Single Sign-On
For identity management, AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO) is where you create, or connect, your workforce identities in AWS once and manage access centrally across your AWS accounts in AWS Organizations. In 2021, AWS SSO announced new integrations for JumpCloud and CyberArk users. This adds to the list of providers that you can use to connect your users and groups, which also includes Microsoft Active Directory Domain Services, Okta Universal Directory, Azure AD, OneLogin, and Ping Identity.
For access management, there have been a range of feature launches with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) that have added up to more power and visibility in the permissions management system. Here are some key examples.
IAM made it simpler to relate a user’s IAM role activity to their corporate identity. By setting the new source identity attribute, which persists through role assumption chains and gets logged in AWS CloudTrail, you can find out who is responsible for actions that IAM roles performed.
IAM added support for policy conditions, to help manage permissions for AWS services that access your resources. This important feature launch of service principal conditions helps you to distinguish between API calls being made on your behalf by a service principal, and those being made by a principal inside your account. You can choose to allow or deny the calls depending on your needs. As a security professional, you might find this especially useful in conjunction with the aws:CalledVia condition key, which allows you to scope permissions down to specify that this account principal can only call this API if they are calling it using a particular AWS service that’s acting on their behalf. For example, your account principal can’t generally access a particular Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket, but if they are accessing it by using Amazon Athena, they can do so. These conditions can also be used in service control policies (SCPs) to give account principals broader scope across an account, organizational unit, or organization; they need not be added to individual principal policies or resource policies.
Another very handy new IAM feature launch is additional information about the reason for an access denied error message. With this additional information, you can now see which of the relevant access control policies (for example, IAM, resource, SCP, or VPC endpoint) was the cause of the denial. As of now, this new IAM feature is supported by more than 50% of all AWS services in the AWS SDK and AWS Command Line Interface, and a fast-growing number in the AWS Management Console. We will continue to add support for this capability across services, as well as add more features that are designed to make the journey to least privilege simpler.
IAM Access Analyzer also launched the ability to generate fine-grained policies based on analyzing past AWS CloudTrail activity. This feature provides a great new capability for DevOps teams or central security teams to scope down policies to just the permissions needed, making it simpler to implement least privilege permissions. IAM Access Analyzer launched further enhancements to expand policy checks, and the ability to generate a sample least-privilege policy from past activity was expanded beyond the account level to include an analysis of principal behavior within the entire organization by analyzing log activity stored in AWS CloudTrail.
AWS Resource Access Manager
AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM) helps you securely share your resources across unrelated AWS accounts within your organization or organizational units (OUs) in AWS Organizations. Now you can also share your resources with IAM roles and IAM users for supported resource types. This update enables more granular access using managed permissions that you can use to define access to shared resources. In addition to the default managed permission defined for each shareable resource type, you now have more flexibility to choose which permissions to grant to whom for resource types that support additional managed permissions. Additionally, AWS RAM added support for global resource types, enabling you to provision a global resource once, and share that resource across your accounts. A global resource is one that can be used in multiple AWS Regions; the first example of a global resource is found in AWS Cloud WAN, currently in preview as of this publication. AWS RAM helps you more securely share an AWS Cloud WAN core network, which is a managed network containing AWS and on-premises networks. With AWS RAM global resource sharing, you can use the Cloud WAN core network to centrally operate a unified global network across Regions and accounts.
AWS Directory Service
AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory, also known as AWS Managed Microsoft Active Directory (AD), was updated to automatically provide domain controller and directory utilization metrics in Amazon CloudWatch for new and existing directories. Analyzing these utilization metrics helps you quantify your average and peak load times to identify the need for additional domain controllers. With this, you can define the number of domain controllers to meet your performance, resilience, and cost requirements.
Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognitoidentity pools (federated identities) was updated to enable you to use attributes from social and corporate identity providers to make access control decisions and simplify permissions management in AWS resources. In Amazon Cognito, you can choose predefined attribute-tag mappings, or you can create custom mappings using the attributes from social and corporate providers’ access and ID tokens, or SAML assertions. You can then reference the tags in an IAM permissions policy to implement attribute-based access control (ABAC) and manage access to your AWS resources. Amazon Cognito also launched a new console experience for user pools and now supports targeted sign out through refresh token revocation.
Governance, control, and logging services
There were a number of important releases in 2021 in the areas of governance, control, and logging services.
This approach provides a powerful new middle ground between the older security models of prevention (which provide developers only an access denied message, and often can’t distinguish between an acceptable and an unacceptable use of the same API) and a detect and react model (when undesired states have already gone live). The Cfn-Guard 2.0 model gives builders the freedom to build with IaC, while allowing central teams to have the ability to reject infrastructure configurations or changes that don’t conform to central policies—and to do so with completely custom error messages that invite dialog between the builder team and the central team, in case the rule is unnuanced and needs to be refined, or if a specific exception needs to be created.
For example, a builder team might be allowed to provision and attach an internet gateway to a VPC, but the team can do this only if the routes to the internet gateway are limited to a certain pre-defined set of CIDR ranges, such as the public addresses of the organization’s branch offices. It’s not possible to write an IAM policy that takes into account the CIDR values of a VPC route table update, but you can write a Cfn-Guard 2.0 rule that allows the creation and use of an internet gateway, but only with a defined and limited set of IP addresses.
AWS Systems Manager Incident Manager
An important launch that security professionals should know about is AWS Systems Manager Incident Manager. Incident Manager provides a number of powerful capabilities for managing incidents of any kind, including operational and availability issues but also security issues. With Incident Manager, you can automatically take action when a critical issue is detected by an Amazon CloudWatch alarm or Amazon EventBridge event. Incident Manager runs pre-configured response plans to engage responders by using SMS and phone calls, can enable chat commands and notifications using AWS Chatbot, and runs automation workflows with AWS Systems Manager Automation runbooks. The Incident Manager console integrates with AWS Systems Manager OpsCenter to help you track incidents and post-incident action items from a central place that also synchronizes with third-party management tools such as Jira Service Desk and ServiceNow. Incident Manager enables cross-account sharing of incidents using AWS RAM, and provides cross-Region replication of incidents to achieve higher availability.
Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) is one of the most important services at AWS, and its steady addition of security-related enhancements is always big news. Here are the 2021 highlights.
Access Points aliases
Amazon S3 introduced a new feature, Amazon S3 Access Points aliases. With Amazon S3 Access Points aliases, you can make the access points backwards-compatible with a large amount of existing code that is programmed to interact with S3 buckets rather than access points.
To understand the importance of this launch, we have to go back to 2019 to the launch of Amazon S3 Access Points. Access points are a powerful mechanism for managing S3 bucket access. They provide a great simplification for managing and controlling access to shared datasets in S3 buckets. You can create up to 1,000 access points per Region within each of your AWS accounts. Although bucket access policies remain fully enforced, you can delegate access control from the bucket to its access points, allowing for distributed and granular control. Each access point enforces a customizable policy that can be managed by a particular workgroup, while also avoiding the problem of bucket policies needing to grow beyond their maximum size. Finally, you can also bind an access point to a particular VPC for its lifetime, to prevent access directly from the internet.
With the 2021 launch of Access Points aliases, Amazon S3 now generates a unique DNS name, or alias, for each access point. The Access Points aliases look and acts just like an S3 bucket to existing code. This means that you don’t need to make changes to older code to use Amazon S3 Access Points; just substitute an Access Points aliases wherever you previously used a bucket name. As a security team, it’s important to know that this flexible and powerful administrative feature is backwards-compatible and can be treated as a drop-in replacement in your various code bases that use Amazon S3 but haven’t been updated to use access point APIs. In addition, using Access Points aliases adds a number of powerful security-related controls, such as permanent binding of S3 access to a particular VPC.
S3 Bucket Keys were launched at the end of 2020, another great launch that security professionals should know about, so here is an overview in case you missed it. S3 Bucket Keys are data keys generated by AWS KMS to provide another layer of envelope encryption in which the outer layer (the S3 Bucket Key) is cached by S3 for a short period of time. This extra key layer increases performance and reduces the cost of requests to AWS KMS. It achieves this by decreasing the request traffic from Amazon S3 to AWS KMS from a one-to-one model—one request to AWS KMS for each object written to or read from Amazon S3—to a one-to-many model using the cached S3 Bucket Key. The S3 Bucket Key is never stored persistently in an unencrypted state outside AWS KMS, and so Amazon S3 ultimately must always return to AWS KMS to encrypt and decrypt the S3 Bucket Key, and thus, the data. As a result, you still retain control of the key hierarchy and resulting encrypted data through AWS KMS, and are still able to audit Amazon S3 returning periodically to AWS KMS to refresh the S3 Bucket Keys, as logged in CloudTrail.
Returning to our review of 2021, S3 Bucket Keys gained the ability to use Amazon S3 Inventory and Amazon S3 Batch Operations automatically to migrate objects from the higher cost, slightly lower-performance SSE-KMS model to the lower-cost, higher-performance S3 Bucket Keys model.
To understand this launch, we need to go in time to the origins of Amazon S3, which is one of the oldest services in AWS, created even before IAM was launched in 2011. In those pre-IAM days, a storage system like Amazon S3 needed to have some kind of access control model, so Amazon S3 invented its own: Amazon S3 access control lists (ACLs). Using ACLs, you could add access permissions down to the object level, but only with regard to access by other AWS account principals (the only kind of identity that was available at the time), or public access (read-only or read-write) to an object. And in this model, objects were always owned by the creator of the object, not the bucket owner.
After IAM was introduced, Amazon S3 added the bucket policy feature, a type of resource policy that provides the rich features of IAM, including full support for all IAM principals (users and roles), time-of-day conditions, source IP conditions, ability to require encryption, and more. For many years, Amazon S3 access decisions have been made by combining IAM policy permissions and ACL permissions, which has served customers well. But the object-writer-is-owner issue has often caused friction. The good news for security professionals has been that a deny by either type of access control type overrides an allow by the other, so there were no security issues with this bi-modal approach. The challenge was that it could be administratively difficult to manage both resource policies—which exist at the bucket and access point level—and ownership and ACLs—which exist at the object level. Ownership and ACLs might potentially impact the behavior of only a handful of objects, in a bucket full of millions or billions of objects.
With the features released in 2021, Amazon S3 has removed these points of friction, and now provides the features needed to reduce ownership issues and to make IAM-based policies the only access control system for a specified bucket. The first step came in 2020 with the ability to make object ownership track bucket ownership, regardless of writer. But that feature applied only to newly-written objects. The final step is the 2021 launch we’re highlighting here: the ability to disable at the bucket level the evaluation of all existing ACLs—including ownership and permissions—effectively nullifying all object ACLs. From this point forward, you have the mechanisms you need to govern Amazon S3 access with a combination of S3 bucket policies, S3 access point policies, and (within the same account) IAM principal policies, without worrying about legacy models of ACLs and per-object ownership.
Additional database and storage service features
AWS Backup Vault Lock
AWS Backup added an important new additional layer for backup protection with the availability of AWS Backup Vault Lock. A vault lock feature in AWS is the ability to configure a storage policy such that even the most powerful AWS principals (such as an account or Org root principal) can only delete data if the deletion conforms to the preset data retention policy. Even if the credentials of a powerful administrator are compromised, the data stored in the vault remains safe. Vault lock features are extremely valuable in guarding against a wide range of security and resiliency risks (including accidental deletion), notably in an era when ransomware represents a rising threat to data.
ACM Private CA achieved FedRAMP authorization for six additional AWS Regions in the US.
Additional certificate customization now allows administrators to tailor the contents of certificates for new use cases, such as identity and smart card certificates; or to securely add information to certificates instead of relying only on the information present in the certificate request.
Additional capabilities were added for sharing CAs across accounts by using AWS RAM to help administrators issue fully-customized certificates, or revoke them, from a shared CA.
Integration with Kubernetes provides a more secure certificate authority solution for Kubernetes containers.
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) provides a fully-managed solution for notifying endpoints that certificates have been revoked, without the need for you to manage or operate infrastructure yourself.
Network and application protection
We saw a lot of enhancements in network and application protection in 2021 that will help you to enforce fine-grained security policies at important network control points across your organization. The services and new capabilities offer flexible solutions for inspecting and filtering traffic to help prevent unauthorized resource access.
AWS WAF
AWS WAF launched AWS WAF Bot Control, which gives you visibility and control over common and pervasive bots that consume excess resources, skew metrics, cause downtime, or perform other undesired activities. The Bot Control managed rule group helps you monitor, block, or rate-limit pervasive bots, such as scrapers, scanners, and crawlers. You can also allow common bots that you consider acceptable, such as status monitors and search engines. AWS WAF also added support for custom responses, managed rule group versioning, in-line regular expressions, and Captcha. The Captcha feature has been popular with customers, removing another small example of “undifferentiated work” for customers.
AWS Shield Advanced
AWS Shield Advanced now automatically protects web applications by blocking application layer (L7) DDoS events with no manual intervention needed by you or the AWS Shield Response Team (SRT). When you protect your resources with AWS Shield Advanced and enable automatic application layer DDoS mitigation, Shield Advanced identifies patterns associated with L7 DDoS events and isolates this anomalous traffic by automatically creating AWS WAF rules in your web access control lists (ACLs).
Amazon CloudFront
In other edge networking news, Amazon CloudFront added support for response headers policies. This means that you can now add cross-origin resource sharing (CORS), security, and custom headers to HTTP responses returned by your CloudFront distributions. You no longer need to configure your origins or use custom Lambda@Edge or CloudFront Functions to insert these headers.
Following Route 53 Resolver’s much-anticipated launch of DNS logging in 2020, the big news for 2021 was the launch of its DNS Firewall capability. Route 53 Resolver DNS Firewall lets you create “blocklists” for domains you don’t want your VPC resources to communicate with, or you can take a stricter, “walled-garden” approach by creating “allowlists” that permit outbound DNS queries only to domains that you specify. You can also create alerts for when outbound DNS queries match certain firewall rules, allowing you to test your rules before deploying for production traffic. Route 53 Resolver DNS Firewall launched with two managed domain lists—malware domains and botnet command and control domains—enabling you to get started quickly with managed protections against common threats. It also integrated with Firewall Manager (see the following section) for easier centralized administration.
AWS Network Firewall and Firewall Manager
Speaking of AWS Network Firewall and Firewall Manager, 2021 was a big year for both. Network Firewall added support for AWS Managed Rules, which are groups of rules based on threat intelligence data, to enable you to stay up to date on the latest security threats without writing and maintaining your own rules. AWS Network Firewall features a flexible rules engine enabling you to define firewall rules that give you fine-grained control over network traffic. As of the launch in late 2021, you can enable managed domain list rules to block HTTP and HTTPS traffic to domains identified as low-reputation, or that are known or suspected to be associated with malware or botnets. Prior to that, another important launch was new configuration options for rule ordering and default drop, making it simpler to write and process rules to monitor your VPC traffic. Also in 2021, Network Firewall announced a major regional expansion following its initial launch in 2020, and a range of compliance achievements and eligibility including HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC, and ISO.
Elastic Load Balancing now supports forwarding traffic directly from Network Load Balancer (NLB) to Application Load Balancer (ALB). With this important new integration, you can take advantage of many critical NLB features such as support for AWS PrivateLink and exposing static IP addresses for applications that still require ALB.
The AWS Networking team also made Amazon VPC private NAT gateways available in both AWS GovCloud (US) Regions. The expansion into the AWS GovCloud (US) Regions enables US government agencies and contractors to move more sensitive workloads into the cloud by helping them to address certain regulatory and compliance requirements.
Compute
Security professionals should also be aware of some interesting enhancements in AWS compute services that can help improve their organization’s experience in building and operating a secure environment.
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) launched the Global View on the console to provide visibility to all your resources across Regions. Global View helps you monitor resource counts, notice abnormalities sooner, and find stray resources. A few days into 2022, another simple but extremely useful EC2 launch was the new ability to obtain instance tags from the Instance Metadata Service (IMDS). Many customers run code on Amazon EC2 that needs to introspect about the EC2 tags associated with the instance and then change its behavior depending on the content of the tags. Prior to this launch, you had to associate an EC2 role and call the EC2 API to get this information. That required access to API endpoints, either through a NAT gateway or a VPC endpoint for Amazon EC2. Now, that information can be obtained directly from the IMDS, greatly simplifying a common use case.
Amazon EC2 launched sharing of Amazon Machine Images (AMIs) with AWS Organizations and Organizational Units (OUs). Previously, you could share AMIs only with specific AWS account IDs. To share AMIs within AWS Organizations, you had to explicitly manage sharing of AMIs on an account-by-account basis, as they were added to or removed from AWS Organizations. With this new feature, you no longer have to update your AMI permissions because of organizational changes. AMI sharing is automatically synchronized when organizational changes occur. This feature greatly helps both security professionals and governance teams to centrally manage and govern AMIs as you grow and scale your AWS accounts. As previously noted, this feature was also added to EC2 Image Builder. Finally, Amazon Data Lifecycle Manager, the tool that manages all your EBS volumes and AMIs in a policy-driven way, now supports automatic deprecation of AMIs. As a security professional, you will find this helpful as you can set a timeline on your AMIs so that, if the AMIs haven’t been updated for a specified period of time, they will no longer be considered valid or usable by development teams.
Looking ahead
In 2022, AWS continues to deliver experiences that meet administrators where they govern, developers where they code, and applications where they run. We will continue to summarize important launches in future blog posts. If you’re interested in learning more about AWS services, join us for AWS re:Inforce, the AWS conference focused on cloud security, identity, privacy, and compliance. AWS re:Inforce 2022 will take place July 26–27 in Boston, MA. Registration is now open. Register now with discount code SALxUsxEFCw to get $150 off your full conference pass to AWS re:Inforce. For a limited time only and while supplies last. We look forward to seeing you there!
To stay up to date on the latest product and feature launches and security use cases, be sure to read the What’s New with AWS announcements (or subscribe to the RSS feed) and the AWS Security Blog.
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.
Many of our customers use AWS Organizations to manage multiple Amazon Web Services (AWS) accounts. There are many benefits to using multiple accounts in your organization, such as grouping workloads with a common business purpose, complying with regulatory frameworks, and establishing strong isolation barriers between applications based on ownership. Customers are even using distinct accounts for development, testing, and production. As these accounts proliferate, customers need a way to centrally set guardrails and controls.
In this blog post, we will walk you through different techniques that you can use to get more out of AWS Organizations service control policies (SCPs) in a multi-account environment. We focus on policy evaluation logic and how SCPs fit into it, show an overview of SCP inheritance, and describe methods for writing compact SCPs. We cover the following five techniques:
Consider the number of policies per entity
Use policy inheritance
Segment by workload type
Combine policies together
Compact your policies
AWS Organizations provides a mechanism to set distinct logical boundaries by using organizational units (OUs). This is useful when you have similar workloads across different AWS accounts that require common guardrails. SCPs are a type of organization policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization. SCPs help you make sure that your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines. A key distinction of SCPs is that they are useful to set broad guardrails across your environment. You can think of guardrails as a way to enforce specific governance policies at varying levels of your environment, which we will discuss in this post.
Policy evaluation logic and how SCPs fit in
Before we dig into the details, let’s first look at how SCPs work from an overall policy perspective, along with the evaluation logic. An explicit Deny statement in any policy trumps an Allow statement. Organization SCPs that apply to any AWS account that is part of an organization in AWS Organizations require an Allow statement before proceeding in the policy evaluation flow.
For an in-depth look at how policies are evaluated, see Policy evaluation logic in the documentation.
Now, let’s walk through five recommended techniques that can help you get more out of SCPs.
1. Consider the number of policies per entity
An organization is a collection of AWS accounts that you manage together. You can use OUs to group accounts within an organization and administer them as a single unit. This greatly simplifies the management of your accounts. It’s possible to create multiple OUs within a single organization, and you can create OUs within other OUs, otherwise known as nested OUs. You have the flexibility to attach multiple policies to the root of the organization, to an OU, or to an account. For example, in an organization that has the root, one OU, and one account, attaching five SCPs to each of them would produce a total of 15 SCPs (five SCPs at the root, five SCPs at the OU, and five SCPs on the one account).
The number of SCPs that you can apply is limited, and being close to or at the quota could restrict your ability to add more policies in the future. The current published quotas are as follows:
Maximum number of SCPs attached to the root: 5
Maximum number of SCPs attached to each OU: 5
OU maximum nesting in a root: 5 levels of OUs under a root
Maximum number of SCPs attached to each account: 5
Consider the following sample organization structure to understand how you can apply multiple SCPs at different levels in an organization.
Figure 1: A sample organization showing the maximum number of SCPs applicable at each level (root, OU, account)
2. Use policy inheritance
Policy inheritance refers to the inheritance of policies that are attached to the organization’s root or to an OU. All accounts that are members of the organization root or OU where a policy is attached are affected by that policy, but inheritance works differently for Allow and Deny statements. For a permission to be allowed for a specified account, every SCP from the root through each OU in the direct path to the account, and even attached to the account itself, must allow that permission. In other words, a statement that allows access needs to exist at every level of a hierarchy; it’s not inherited. However, a Deny statement is inherited and evaluated at each level.
At this point, you should start thinking about the policies from a broader controls perspective: Controls that you want to implement on the whole organization should go into your organization’s root-level SCP. Controls should be more granular as you move down the hierarchy in AWS Organizations.
For example, when a Deny policy is attached to the organization’s root, all accounts in the organization are affected by that policy. When you attach a Deny policy to a specific OU, accounts that are directly under that OU or nested OUs under it are affected by that policy. Because you can attach policies to multiple levels in the organization, accounts might have multiple applicable policy documents, as shown in Figure 2.
By default, AWS Organizations attaches an AWS managed SCP named FullAWSAccess to every root and OU when it’s created. This policy allows all services and actions.
Note: Adding an SCP with full AWS access doesn’t give all the principals in an account access to everything. SCPs don’t grant permissions; they are used to filter permissions. Principals still need a policy within the account that grants them access.
Additionally, the policies that are applied to an OU only affect the accounts or the child OUs under it and don’t affect other OUs created under the root. For example, a policy applied to the Sandbox OU doesn’t affect the Workloads OU.
The two tables that follow show examples of the policies that result from inheritance. As discussed previously, if an Allow isn’t present at all levels (root, OU, and account) the account won’t have access to any service. Consider the last example in the Sandbox OU table with a “Deny S3 access” SCP at the root, which limits access to Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3). Although there is “Allow S3 access” applied to the Sandbox OU and “Full AWS access” at the account level, the resultant policy on account A is “No service access” because there is no policy with an effect of “Allow” in the SCP at the root level.
The following table shows the inheritance of policies in the Sandbox OU.
A key feature of AWS Organizations is the ability to create distinct workload boundaries by using organizational units (OUs). You can think of OUs as a logical boundary where you can directly apply SCPs. You can also nest OUs up to five levels deep and apply different policies at each level. By using OUs, you can segment your workload types and create purpose-driven guardrails to match your security and compliance requirements.
To illustrate this, let’s take an example where there are three distinct workload types divided into three separate OUs: Infrastructure, Sandbox, and Workload, as shown in Figure 3. A best practice would be to tailor your SCPs to each specific OU type. Your security organization wouldn’t want to allow private workloads to be reachable from the internet. However, workloads that serve your external customers would require external network connectivity. To support innovation and experimentation, you can establish a Sandbox OU that has fewer policy restrictions but might limit connectivity back to your corporate data center.
For additional information on how to organize your OUs, see Recommended OUs.
Figure 3: Example organization showing different workloads
4. Combine policies together
Similar to AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies, you can have multiple statements within a service control policy. You can combine statements in a single policy to avoid hitting the quota limit of five policies per account, OU, or root. An AWS full access policy is attached by default when you enable SCPs on an organization. You can combine the full access policy with additional controls and combine statements, as shown in the following example policy. Each SCP that you apply can have a policy size of 5,120 bytes. When combining statements, make sure that the resultant statement doesn’t alter your original intent. You can combine the Action elements in an SCP if the policy has the same values for Effect, Resource, and Condition.
One difference between IAM policies and SCPs is that whitespace counts against the size quota in SCPs. Compacting related actions in a policy can help you shorten the policy. Following are four methods to compact your policy:
Remove whitespace. If you use the AWS Management Console, whitespace is automatically removed. However, if you don’t want to manually update policies by using the console every time, you can incorporate a script that removes the whitespace. (Method four later in this list provides an example of this type of script.)
Use wildcards and prefixes to combine multiple actions. For example, the following policy denies access to disable configuration in AWS Security Hub.
Important: When you combine actions together as in this example, be aware that there could be a potential impact if new actions are released in the future that start with the Disable keyword, because these actions will be covered by the wildcard and denied.
SCPs can be configured to work as either deny lists or allow lists. For additional details on allow lists and deny lists, see Strategies for using SCPs. We recommend that you use deny lists where possible, because they are more flexible and can help simplify your policies, which will result in less maintenance. To expand on this strategy, deny statements support conditions (as shown in the following example), and for specific resources to be specified. For example, when AWS adds a new service, you don’t have to go back and update your policy if you’ve used a deny statement. To support this, AWS Organizations attaches an AWS managed SCP named FullAWSAccess to every root and OU when it’s created. This policy allows all services and actions. Additionally, deny statements coupled with NotAction statements can help you write shorter policies.
Consider the following scenario: Your security organization requires that application teams use specific AWS Regions. The recommended approach is to create a deny list that blocks everything except what is in the NotAction block. Following is an example where the SCP denies any operation outside of specified Regions that your organization has authorized for use.
Note: The list includes AWS global services that cannot be allowlisted based on a Region.
Shorten the Sid value in your policy: The Sid (statement ID) is an optional identifier that you provide for the policy statement. Remove it completely from your policy if it serves no purpose for you. We also have customers who find it effective to maintain a list of SID values and details on corresponding policies in an index file locally.
The following sample Python code can compress a provided policy by removing whitespace and Sid values.
You can export the compressed policy in the file named Compressed_Policy.json or show the output on the terminal by removing # from the following code.
import json
def compress_json(policy):
statement = policy["Statement"]
if not isinstance(statement, list):
statement = [statement]
for s in statement:
s.pop("Sid", None)
# json.dumps removes whitespace around separators in a JSON and converts it to a JSON formatted string.
# To get the most compact representation, specify separators=(item_separator, key_separator)
policy_without_whitespace = json.dumps(policy, separators=(',', ':'))
return policy_without_whitespace
if __name__ == '__main__':
path = input("Enter the path to policy file like: \n /Users/swara/Desktop/policy.json or ./policy.json \n > ")
with open(path) as f:
policy = json.load(f)
original_len = len(str(policy))
mini_policy = compress_json(policy)
#To print the output on the screen
print(mini_policy)
compressed_len = len(str(mini_policy))
print("\n \t original length: {} -> compressed length: {} \n".format(original_len, compressed_len))
#To write output to a file named Compressed_Policy.json
with open("Compressed_Policy.json", "w") as Output_file:
print(mini_policy, file=Output_file)
Example output on screen:
{"Version":"2012-10-17","Statement":[{"Action":["iam:AttachRolePolicy","iam:DeleteRole","iam:DeleteRolePermissionsBoundary","iam:DeleteRolePolicy","iam:DetachRolePolicy","iam:PutRolePermissionsBoundary","iam:PutRolePolicy","iam:UpdateAssumeRolePolicy","iam:UpdateRole","iam:UpdateRoleDescription"],"Resource":["arn:aws:iam::*:role/role-to-deny"],"Effect":"Deny"}]}
original length: 433 -> compressed length: 364
To download the sample python code and the example policy shown above, download the files compress-policy.py and policy.json.
Conclusion
In this post, we walked you through different techniques that you can use to get more out of service control policies in a multi-account environment. By using these techniques, you can establish a well-considered strategy for how your organization can adopt SCPs in a multi-account environment. You also learned about how SCPs fit into the overall policy landscape for AWS. SCPs are a powerful tool to help customers establish guardrails. As you evaluate your IAM strategy, consider what you’re trying to achieve. If you’re trying to establish broad guardrails for multiple accounts, then we suggest looking at SCPs first.
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, contact AWS Support.
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.
Organizations building enterprise-scale systems require the setup of a secure and governed landing zone to deploy and operate their systems. A landing zone is a starting point from which your organization can quickly launch and deploy workloads and applications with confidence in your security and infrastructure environment as described in What is a landing zone?. Nationwide Building Society (Nationwide) is the world’s largest building society. It is owned by its 16 million members and exists to serve their needs. The Society is one of the UK’s largest providers for mortgages, savings and current accounts, as well as being a major provider of ISAs, credit cards, personal loans, insurance, and investments.
For one of its business initiatives, Nationwide utilizes AWS Control Tower to build and operate their landing zone which provides a well-established pattern to set up and govern a secure, multi-account AWS environment. Nationwide operates in a highly regulated industry and our governance assurance requires adequate control of any privileged access to production line-of-business data or to resources which have access to them. We chose for this specific business initiative to deploy our landing zone using AWS Organizations, to benefit from ongoing account management and governance as aligned with AWS implementation best practices. We also utilized AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO) to create our workforce identities in AWS once and manage access centrally across our AWS Organization. In this blog, we describe the integrations required across AWS Control Tower and AWS SSO to implement a break-glass mechanism that makes access reporting publishable to system operators as well as to internal audit systems and processes. We will outline how we used AWS SSO for our setup as well as the three architecture options we considered, and why we went with the chosen solution.
Sourcing AWS SSO access data for near real-time monitoring
In our setup, we have multiple AWS Accounts and multiple trails on each of these accounts. Users will regularly navigate across multiple accounts as they operate our infrastructure, and their journeys are marked across these multiple trails. Typically, AWS CloudTrail would be our chosen resource to clearly and unambiguously identify account or data access. The key challenge in this scenario was to design an efficient and cost-effective solution to scan these trails to help identify and report on break-glass user access to account and production data. To address this challenge, we developed the following two architecture design options.
Option 1: A decentralized approach that uses AWS CloudFormation StackSets, Amazon EventBridge and AWS Lambda
Our solution entailed a decentralized approach by deploying a CloudFormation StackSet to create, update, or delete stacks across multiple accounts and AWS Regions with a single operation. The Stackset created Amazon EventBridge rules and target AWS Lambda functions. These functions post to EventBridge in our audit account. Our audit account has a set of Lambda functions running off EventBridge to initiate specific events, format the event message and post to Slack, our centralized communication platform for this implementation. Figure 1 depicts the overall architecture for this option.
Figure 1. De-centralized logging using Amazon EventBridge and AWS Lambda
Option 2: Use an organization trail in the Organization Management account
This option uses the centralized organization trail in the Organization Management account to source audit data. Details of how to create an organization trail can be found in the AWS CloudTrail User Guide. CloudTrail was configured to send log events to CloudWatch Logs. These events are then sent via Lambda functions to Slack using webhooks. We used a public terraform module in this GitHub repository to build this Lambda Slack integration. Figure 2 depicts the overall architecture for this option.
Figure 2. Centralized logging pattern using Amazon CloudWatch
This was our preferred option and is the one we finally implemented.
We also evaluated a third option which was to use centralized logging and auditing feature enabled by Control Tower. Users authenticate and federate to target accounts from a central location so it seemed possible to source this info from the centralized logs. These log events arrive as .gz compressed json objects, which meant having to expand these archives repeatedly for inspection. We therefore decided against this option.
A centralized, economic, extensible solution to alert of SSO break-glass
Our requirement was to identify break-glass access across any of the access mechanisms supported by AWS, including CLI and User Portal access. To ensure we have comprehensive coverage across all access mechanisms, we identified all the events initiated for each access mechanism:
User Portal/AWS Console access events
Authenticate
ListApplications
ListApplicationProfiles
Federate – this event contains the role that the user is federating into
CLI access events
CreateToken
ListAccounts
ListAccountRoles
GetRoleCredentials – this event contains the role that the user is federating into
EventBridge is able to initiate actions after events only when the event is trying to perform changes (when the “readOnly” attribute on the event record body equals “false”).
The AWS support team was aware of this attribute and recommended that we, change the data flow we were using to one able to initiate actions after any kind of event, regardless of the value on its readOnly attribute. The solution in our case was to send the CloudTrail logs to CloudWatch Logs. This then and initiates the Lambda function through a filter subscription that detects the desired event names on the log content.
Due to the query size in the CloudWatch Log queries we had to remove the subscription filters and do the parsing of the content of the log lines inside the lambda function. In order to determine what accounts would initiate the notifications, we sent the list of accounts and roles to it as an environment variable at runtime.
Considerations with cross-account SSO access
With direct federation users get an access token. This is most obvious in AWS single sign on at the chiclet page as “Command line or programmatic access”. SSO tokens have a limited lifetime (we use the default 1-hour). A user does not have to get a new token to access a target resource until the one they are using is expired. This means that a user may repeatedly access a target account using the same token during its lifetime. Although the token is made available at the chiclet page, the GetRoleCredentials event does not occur until it is used to authenticate an API call to the target AWS account.
Conclusion
In this blog, we discussed how AWS Control Tower and AWS Single Sign-on enabled Nationwide to build and govern a secure, multi-account AWS environment for one of their business initiatives and centralize access management across our implementation. The integration was important for us to accurately and comprehensively identify and audit break-glass access for our implementation. As a result, we were able to satisfy our security and compliance audit requirements for privileged access to our AWS accounts.
Recently, AWS launched the ability to delegate administration of AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO) in your AWS Organizations organization to a member account (an account other than the management account). This post will show you a practical approach to using this new feature. For the documentation for this feature, see Delegated administration in the AWS Single Sign-On User Guide.
With AWS Organizations, your enterprise organization can manage your accounts more securely and at scale. One of the benefits of Organizations is that it integrates with many other AWS services, so you can centrally manage accounts and how the services in those accounts can be used.
AWS SSO is where you can create, or connect, your workforce identities in AWS just once, and then manage access centrally across your AWS organization. You can create user identities directly in AWS SSO, or you can bring them from your Microsoft Active Directory or a standards-based identity provider, such as Okta Universal Directory or Azure AD. With AWS SSO, you get a unified administration experience to define, customize, and assign fine-grained access.
By default, the management account in an AWS organization has the power and authority to manage member accounts in the organization. Because of these additional permissions, it is important to exercise least privilege and tightly control access to the management account. AWS recommends that enterprises create one or more accounts specifically designated for security of the organization, with proper controls and access management policies in place. AWS provides a method in which many services can be administered for the organization from a member account; this is usually referred to as a delegated administrator account. These accounts can reside in a security organizational unit (OU), where administrators can enforce organizational policies. Figure 1 is an example of a recommended set of OUs in Organizations.
Figure 1: Recommended AWS Organizations OUs
Many AWS services support this delegated administrator model, including Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Security Hub, and Amazon Macie. For an up-to-date complete list, see AWS services that you can use with AWS Organizations. AWS SSO is now the most recent addition to the list of services in which you can delegate administration of your users, groups, and permissions, including third-party applications, to a member account of your organization.
How to configure a delegated administrator account
In this scenario, your enterprise AnyCompany has an organization consisting of a management account, an account for managing security, as well as a few member accounts. You have enabled AWS SSO in the organization, but you want to enable the security team to manage permissions for accounts and roles in the organization. AnyCompany doesn’t want you to give the security team access to the management account, and they also want to make sure the security team can’t delete the AWS SSO configuration or manage access to that account, so you decide to delegate the administration of AWS SSO to the security account.
Note: There are a few things to consider when making this change, which you should review before you enable delegated administration. These items are covered in the console during the process, and are described in the section Considerations when delegating AWS SSO administration in this post.
To delegate AWS SSO administration to a security account
In the AWS SSO console, navigate to the Region in which AWS SSO is enabled.
Choose Settings on the left navigation pane, and then choose the Management tab on the right side.
Under Delegated administrator, choose Register account, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: The Register account button in AWS SSO
Consider the implications of designating a delegated administrator account (as described in the section Considerations when delegating AWS SSO administration). Select the account you want to be able to manage AWS SSO, and then choose Register account, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Choosing a delegated administrator account in AWS SSO
You should see a success message to indicate that the AWS SSO delegated administrator account is now setup.
To remove delegated AWS SSO administration from an account
In the AWS SSO console, navigate to the Region in which AWS SSO is enabled.
Choose Settings on the left navigation pane, and then choose the Management tab on the right side.
Under Delegated administrator, select Deregister account, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: The Deregister account button in AWS SSO
Consider the implications of removing a delegated administrator account (as described in the section Considerations when delegating AWS SSO administration), then enter the account name that is currently administering AWS SSO, and choose Deregister account, as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Considerations of deregistering a delegated administrator in AWS SSO
There are a few considerations you should keep in mind when you delegate AWS SSO administration. The first consideration is that the delegated administrator account will not be able to perform the following actions:
Delete the AWS SSO configuration.
Delegate (to other accounts) administration of AWS SSO.
Manage user or group access to the management account.
Manage permission sets that are provisioned (have a user or group assigned) in the organization management account.
For examples of those last two actions, consider the following scenarios:
In the first scenario, you are managing AWS SSO from the delegated administrator account. You would like to give your colleague Saanvi access to all the accounts in the organization, including the management account. This action would not be allowed, since the delegated administrator account cannot manage access to the management account. You would need to log in to the management account (with a user or role that has proper permissions) to provision that access.
In a second scenario, you would like to change the permissions Paulo has in the management account by modifying the policy attached to a ManagementAccountAdmin permission set, which Paulo currently has access to. In this scenario, you would also have to do this from inside the management account, since the delegated administrator account does not have permissions to modify the permission set, because it is provisioned to a user in the management account.
With those caveats in mind, users with proper access in the delegated administrator account will be able to control permissions and assignments for users and groups throughout the AWS organization. For more information about limiting that control, see Allow a user to administer AWS SSO for specific accounts in the AWS Single Sign-On User Guide.
Deregistering an AWS SSO delegated administrator account will not affect any permissions or assignments in AWS SSO, but it will remove the ability for users in the delegated account to manage AWS SSO from that account.
Additional considerations if you use Microsoft Active Directory
There are additional considerations for you to keep in mind if you use Microsoft Active Directory (AD) as an identity provider, specifically if you use AWS SSO configurable AD sync, and which AWS account the directory resides in. In order to use AWS SSO delegated administration when the identity source is set to Active Directory, AWS SSO configurable AD sync must be enabled for the directory. Your organization’s administrators must synchronize Active Directory users and groups you want to grant access to into an AWS SSO identity store. When you enable AWS SSO configurable AD sync, a new feature that launched in April, Active Directory administrators can choose which users and groups get synced into AWS SSO, similar to how other external identity providers work today when using the System for Cross-domain Identity Management (SCIM) v2.0 protocol. This way, AWS SSO knows about users and groups even before they are granted access to specific accounts or roles, and AWS SSO administrators don’t have to manually search for them.
Another thing to consider when delegating AWS SSO administration when using AD as an identity source is where your directory resides, that is which AWS account owns the directory. If you decide to change the AWS SSO identity source from any other source to Active Directory, or change it from Active Directory to any other source, then the directory must reside in (be owned by) the account that the change is being performed in. For example, if you are currently signed in to the management account, you can only change the identity source to or from directories that reside in (are owned by) the management account. For more information, see Manage your identity source in the AWS Single Sign-On User Guide.
Best practices for managing AWS SSO with delegated administration
AWS recommends the following best practices when using delegated administration for AWS SSO:
Maintain separate permission sets for use in the organization management account (versus the rest of the accounts). This way, permissions can be kept separate and managed from within the management account without causing confusion among the delegated administrators.
When granting access to the organization management account, grant the access to groups (and permission sets) specifically for access in that account. This helps enable the principal of least privilege for this important account, and helps ensure that AWS SSO delegated administrators are able to manage the rest of the organization as efficiently as possible (by reducing the number of users, groups, and permission sets that are off limits to them).
If you plan on using one of the AWS Directory Services for Microsoft Active Directory (AWS Managed Microsoft AD or AD Connector) as your AWS SSO identity source, locate the directory and the AWS SSO delegated administrator account in the same AWS account.
Conclusion
In this post, you learned about a helpful new feature of AWS SSO, the ability to delegate administration of your users and permissions to a member account of your organization. AWS recommends as a best practice that the management account of an AWS organization be secured by a least privilege access model, in which as few people as possible have access to the account. You can enable delegated administration for supported AWS services, including AWS SSO, as a useful tool to help your organization minimize access to the management account by moving that control into an AWS account designated specifically for security or identity services. We encourage you to consider AWS SSO delegated administration for administrating access in AWS. To learn more about the new feature, see Delegated administration in the AWS Single Sign-On User Guide.
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have questions about this post, start a new thread on the AWS IAM forum or contact AWS Support.
Want more AWS Security how-to content, news, and feature announcements? Follow us on Twitter.
AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) recently launched new condition keys to make it simpler to control access to your resources along your Amazon Web Services (AWS) organizational boundaries. AWS recommends that you set up multiple accounts as your workloads grow, and you can use multiple AWS accounts to isolate workloads or applications that have specific security requirements. By using the new conditions, aws:ResourceOrgID, aws:ResourceOrgPaths, and aws:ResourceAccount, you can define access controls based on an AWS resource’s organization, organizational unit (OU), or account. These conditions make it simpler to require that your principals (users and roles) can only access resources inside a specific boundary within your organization. You can combine the new conditions with other IAM capabilities to restrict access to and from AWS accounts that are not part of your organization.
This post will help you get started using the new condition keys. We’ll show the details of the new condition keys and walk through a detailed example based on the following scenario. We’ll also provide references and links to help you learn more about how to establish access control perimeters around your AWS accounts.
Consider a common scenario where you would like to prevent principals in your AWS organization from adding objects to Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) buckets that don’t belong to your organization. To accomplish this, you can configure an IAM policy to deny access to S3 actions unless aws:ResourceOrgID matches your unique AWS organization ID. Because the policy references your entire organization, rather than individual S3 resources, you have a convenient way to maintain this security posture across any number of resources you control. The new conditions give you the tools to create a security baseline for your IAM principals and help you prevent unintended access to resources in accounts that you don’t control. You can attach this policy to an IAM principal to apply this rule to a single user or role, or use service control policies (SCPs) in AWS Organizations to apply the rule broadly across your AWS accounts. IAM principals that are subject to this policy will only be able to perform S3 actions on buckets and objects within your organization, regardless of their other permissions granted through IAM policies or S3 bucket policies.
New condition key details
You can use the aws:ResourceOrgID, aws:ResourceOrgPaths, and aws:ResourceAccount condition keys in IAM policies to place controls on the resources that your principals can access. The following table explains the new condition keys and what values these keys can take.
Condition key
Description
Operator
Single/multi value
Value
aws:ResourceOrgID
AWS organization ID of the resource being accessed
Note: Of the three keys, only aws:ResourceOrgPaths is a multi-value condition key, while aws:ResourceAccount and aws:ResourceOrgID are single-value keys. For information on how to use multi-value keys, see Creating a condition with multiple keys or values in the IAM documentation.
Resource owner keys compared to principal owner keys
The new IAM condition keys complement the existing principal condition keys aws:PrincipalAccount, aws:PrincipalOrgPaths, and aws:PrincipalOrgID. The principal condition keys help you define which AWS accounts, organizational units (OUs), and organizations are allowed to access your resources. For more information on the principal conditions, see Use IAM to share your AWS resources with groups of AWS accounts in AWS Organizations on the AWS Security Blog.
Using the principal and resource keys together helps you establish permission guardrails around your AWS principals and resources, and makes it simpler to keep your data inside the organization boundaries you define as you continue to scale. For example, you can define identity-based policies that prevent your IAM principals from accessing resources outside your organization (by using the aws:ResourceOrgID condition). Next, you can define resource-based policies that prevent IAM principals outside your organization from accessing resources that are inside your organization boundary (by using the aws:PrincipalOrgID condition). The combination of both policies prevents any access to and from AWS accounts that are not part of your organization. In the next sections, we’ll walk through an example of how to configure the identity-based policy in your organization. For the resource-based policy, you can follow along with the example in An easier way to control access to AWS resources by using the AWS organization of IAM principals on the AWS Security blog.
Setup for the examples
In the following sections, we’ll show an example IAM policy for each of the new conditions. To follow along with Example 1, which uses aws:ResourceAccount, you’ll just need an AWS account.
To follow along with Examples 2 and 3 that use aws:ResourceOrgPaths and aws:ResourceOrgID respectively, you’ll need to have an organization in AWS Organizations and at least one OU created. This blog post assumes that you have some familiarity with the basic concepts in IAM and AWS Organizations. If you need help creating an organization or want to learn more about AWS Organizations, visit Getting Started with AWS Organizations in the AWS documentation.
Which IAM policy type should I use?
You can implement the following examples as identity-based policies, or in SCPs that are managed in AWS Organizations. If you want to establish a boundary for some of your IAM principals, we recommend that you use identity-based policies. If you want to establish a boundary for an entire AWS account or for your organization, we recommend that you use SCPs. Because SCPs apply to an entire AWS account, you should take care when you apply the following policies to your organization, and account for any exceptions to these rules that might be necessary for some AWS services to function properly.
Example 1: Restrict access to AWS resources within a specific AWS account
Let’s look at an example IAM policy that restricts access along the boundary of a single AWS account. For this example, say that you have an IAM principal in account 222222222222, and you want to prevent the principal from accessing S3 objects outside of this account. To create this effect, you could attach the following IAM policy.
Note: This policy is not meant to replace your existing IAM access controls, because it does not grant any access. Instead, this policy can act as an additional guardrail for your other IAM permissions. You can use a policy like this to prevent your principals from access to any AWS accounts that you don’t know or control, regardless of the permissions granted through other IAM policies.
This policy uses a Deny effect to block access to S3 actions unless the S3 resource being accessed is in account 222222222222. This policy prevents S3 access to accounts outside of the boundary of a single AWS account. You can use a policy like this one to limit your IAM principals to access only the resources that are inside your trusted AWS accounts. To implement a policy like this example yourself, replace account ID 222222222222 in the policy with your own AWS account ID. For a policy you can apply to multiple accounts while still maintaining this restriction, you could alternatively replace the account ID with the aws:PrincipalAccount condition key, to require that the principal and resource must be in the same account (see example #3 in this post for more details how to accomplish this).
Organization setup: Welcome to AnyCompany
For the next two examples, we’ll use an example organization called AnyCompany that we created in AWS Organizations. You can create a similar organization to follow along directly with these examples, or adapt the sample policies to fit your own organization. Figure 1 shows the organization structure for AnyCompany.
Figure 1: Organization structure for AnyCompany
Like all organizations, AnyCompany has an organization root. Under the root are three OUs: Media, Sports, and Governance. Under the Sports OU, there are three more OUs: Baseball, Basketball, and Football. AWS accounts in this organization are spread across all the OUs based on their business purpose. In total, there are six OUs in this organization.
Example 2: Restrict access to AWS resources within my organizational unit
Now that you’ve seen what the AnyCompany organization looks like, let’s walk through another example IAM policy that you can use to restrict access to a specific part of your organization. For this example, let’s say you want to restrict S3 object access within the following OUs in the AnyCompany organization:
Media
Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Football
To define a boundary around these OUs, you don’t need to list all of them in your IAM policy. Instead, you can use the organization structure to your advantage. The Baseball, Basketball, and Football OUs share a parent, the Sports OU. You can use the new aws:ResourceOrgPaths key to prevent access outside of the Media OU, the Sports OU, and any OUs under it. Here’s the IAM policy that achieves this effect.
Note: Like the earlier example, this policy does not grant any access. Instead, this policy provides a backstop for your other IAM permissions, preventing your principals from accessing S3 objects outside an OU-defined boundary. If you want to require that your IAM principals consistently follow this rule, we recommend that you apply this policy as an SCP. In this example, we attached this policy to the root of our organization, applying it to all principals across all accounts in the AnyCompany organization.
The policy denies access to S3 actions unless the S3 resource being accessed is in a specific set of OUs in the AnyCompany organization. This policy is identical to Example 1, except for the condition block: The condition requires that aws:ResourceOrgPaths contains any of the listed OU paths. Because aws:ResourceOrgPaths is a multi-value condition, the policy uses the ForAllValues:StringNotLike operator to compare the values of aws:ResourceOrgPaths to the list of OUs in the policy.
The first OU path in the list is for the Media OU. The second OU path is the Sports OU, but it also adds the wildcard character * to the end of the path. The wildcard * matches any combination of characters, and so this condition matches both the Sports OU and any other OU further down its path. Using wildcards in the OU path allows you to implicitly reference other OUs inside the Sports OU, without having to list them explicitly in the policy. For more information about wildcards, refer to Using wildcards in resource ARNs in the IAM documentation.
Example 3: Restrict access to AWS resources within my organization
Finally, we’ll look at a very simple example of a boundary that is defined at the level of an entire organization. This is the same use case as the preceding two examples (restrict access to S3 object access), but scoped to an organization instead of an account or collection of OUs.
Note: Like the earlier examples, this policy does not grant any access. Instead, this policy provides a backstop for your other IAM permissions, preventing your principals from accessing S3 objects outside your organization regardless of their other access permissions. If you want to require that your IAM principals consistently follow this rule, we recommend that you apply this policy as an SCP. As in the previous example, we attached this policy to the root of our organization, applying it to all accounts in the AnyCompany organization.
The policy denies access to S3 actions unless the S3 resource being accessed is in the same organization as the IAM principal that is accessing it. This policy is identical to Example 1, except for the condition block: The condition requires that aws:ResourceOrgID and aws:PrincipalOrgID must be equal to each other. With this requirement, the principal making the request and the resource being accessed must be in the same organization. This policy also applies to S3 resources that are created after the policy is put into effect, so it is simple to maintain the same security posture across all your resources.
In this post, we explored the new conditions, and walked through a few examples to show you how to restrict access to S3 objects across the boundary of an account, OU, or organization. These tools work for more than just S3, though: You can use the new conditions to help you protect a wide variety of AWS services and actions. Here are a few links that you may want to look at:
Whitepaper: Building an AWS Perimeter provides an in-depth overview of how to use these keys as part of a broader strategy to secure your AWS resources.
If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, contact AWS Support or start a new thread on the AWS Identity and Access Management forum. Thanks for reading about this new feature. If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.
The Availability and Beyond whitepaper discusses the concept of static stability for improving resilience. What does static stability mean with regard to a multi-Region disaster recovery (DR) plan? What if the very tools that we rely on for failover are themselves impacted by a DR event?
In this post, you’ll learn how to reduce dependencies in your DR plan and manually control failover even if critical AWS services are disrupted. As a bonus, you’ll see how to use service control policies (SCPs) to help simulate a Regional outage, so that you can test failover scenarios more realistically.
Failover plan dependencies and considerations
Let’s dig into the DR scenario in more detail. Using Amazon Route 53 for Regional failover routing is a common pattern for DR events. In the simplest case, we’ve deployed an application in a primary Region and a backup Region. We have a Route 53 DNS record set with records for both Regions, and all traffic goes to the primary Region. In an event that triggers our DR plan, we manually or automatically switch the DNS records to direct all traffic to the backup Region.
Relying on an automated health check to control Regional failover can be tricky. A health check might not be perfectly reliable if a Region is experiencing some type of degradation. Often, we prefer to initiate our DR plan manually, which then initiates with automation.
What are the dependencies that we’ve baked into this failover plan? First, Route 53, our DNS service, has to be available. It must continue to serve DNS queries, and we have to be able to change DNS records manually. Second, if we do not have a full set of resources already deployed in the backup Region, we must be able to deploy resources into it.
Both dependencies might violate static stability, because we are relying on resources in our DR plan that might be affected by the outage we’re seeing. Ideally, we don’t want to depend on other services running so we can failover and continue to serve our own traffic. How do we reduce additional dependencies?
Static stability
Let’s look at our first dependency on Route 53 – control planes and data planes. Briefly, a control plane is used to configure resources, and the data plane delivers services (see Understanding Availability Needs for a more complete definition.)
The Route 53 data plane, which responds to DNS queries, is highly resilient across Regions. We can safely rely on it during the failure of any single Region. But let’s assume that for some reason we are not able to call on the Route 53 control plane.
Amazon Route 53 Application Recovery Controller (Route 53 ARC) was built to handle this scenario. It provisions a Route 53 health check that we can manually control with a Route 53 ARC routing control, and is a data plane operation. The Route 53 ARC data plane is highly resilient, using a cluster of five Regional endpoints. You can revise the health check if three of the five Regions are available.
The second dependency, being able to deploy resources into the second Region, is not a concern if we run a fully scaled-out set of resources. We must make sure that our deployment mechanism doesn’t rely only on the primary Region. Most AWS services have Regional control planes, so this isn’t an issue.
The AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) data plane is highly available in each Region, so you can authorize the creation of new resources as long as you’ve already defined the roles. Note: If you use federated authentication through an identity provider, you should test that the IdP does not itself have a dependency on another Region.
Testing your disaster recovery plan
Once we’ve identified our dependencies, we need to decide how to simulate a disaster scenario. Two mechanisms you can use for this are network access control lists (NACLs) and SCPs. The first one enables us to restrict network traffic to our service endpoints. However, the second allows defining policies that specify the maximum permissions for the target accounts. It also allows us to simulate a Route 53 or IAM control plane outage by restricting access to the service.
For the end-to-end DR simulation, we’ve published an AWS samples repository on GitHub that you can use to deploy. This evaluates Route 53 ARC capabilities if both Route 53 and IAM control planes aren’t accessible.
By deploying test applications across us-east-1 and us-west-1 AWS Regions, we can simulate a real-world scenario that determines the business continuity impact, failover timing, and procedures required for successful failover with unavailable control planes.
Figure 2. Simulating Regional failover using service control policies
Before you conduct the test outlined in our scenario, we strongly recommend that you create a dedicated AWS testing environment with an AWS Organizations setup. Make sure that you don’t attach SCPs to your organization’s root but instead create a dedicated organization unit (OU). You can use this pattern to test SCPs and ensure that you don’t inadvertently lock out users from key services.
Chaos engineering
Chaos engineering is the discipline of experimenting on a system to build confidence in its capability to withstand turbulent production conditions. Chaos engineering and its principles are important tools when you plan for disaster recovery. Even a simple distributed system may be too complex to operate reliably. It can be hard or impossible to plan for every failure scenario in non-trivial distributed systems, because of the number of failure permutations. Chaos experiments test these unknowns by injecting failures (for example, shutting down EC2 instances) or transient anomalies (for example, unusually high network latency.)
In the context of multi-Region DR, these techniques can help challenge assumptions and expose vulnerabilities. For example, what happens if a health check passes but the system itself is unhealthy, or vice versa? What will you do if your entire monitoring system is offline in your primary Region, or too slow to be useful? Are there control plane operations that you rely on that themselves depend on a single AWS Region’s health, such as Amazon Route 53? How does your workload respond when 25% of network packets are lost? Does your application set reasonable timeouts or does it hang indefinitely when it experiences large network latencies?
Questions like these can feel overwhelming, so start with a few, then test and iterate. You might learn that your system can run acceptably in a degraded mode. Alternatively, you might find out that you need to be able to failover quickly. Regardless of the results, the exercise of performing chaos experiments and challenging assumptions is critical when developing a robust multi-Region DR plan.
Conclusion
In this blog, you learned about reducing dependencies in your DR plan. We showed how you can use Amazon Route 53 Application Recovery Controller to reduce a dependency on the Route 53 control plane, and how to simulate a Regional failure using SCPs. As you evaluate your own DR plan, be sure to take advantage of chaos engineering practices. Formulate questions and test your static stability assumptions. And of course, you can incorporate these questions into a custom lens when you run a Well-Architected review using the AWS Well-Architected Tool.
AWS Control Tower offers a straightforward way to set up and govern an Amazon Web Services (AWS) multi-account environment, following prescriptive best practices. AWS Control Tower orchestrates the capabilities of several other AWS services, including AWS Organizations, AWS Service Catalog, and AWS Single Sign-On (AWS SSO), to build a landing zone very quickly. AWS SSO is a cloud-based service that simplifies how you manage SSO access to AWS accounts and business applications using Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) 2.0. You can use AWS Control Tower to create and provision new AWS accounts and use AWS SSO to assign user access to those newly-created accounts.
Some customers need to provision tens, if not hundreds, of new AWS accounts at one time and assign access to many users. If you are using AWS Control Tower, doing this requires that you provision an AWS account in AWS Control Tower, and then assign the user access to the AWS account in AWS SSO before moving to the next AWS account. This process adds complexity and time for administrators who manage the AWS environment while delaying users’ access to their AWS accounts.
In this blog post, we’ll show you how to automate creating multiple AWS accounts in AWS Control Tower, and how to automate assigning user access to the AWS accounts in AWS SSO, with the ability to repeat the process easily for subsequent batches of accounts. This solution simplifies the provisioning and assignment processes, while enabling automation for your AWS environment, and allows your builders to start using and experimenting on AWS more quickly.
Figure 1 shows the architecture and workflow of the batch AWS account creation and SSO assignment processes.
Figure 1: Batch AWS account creation and SSO assignment automation architecture and workflow
Before starting
This solution is configured to be deployed in the North Virginia Region (us-east-1). But you can change the CloudFormation template to run in any Region that supports all the services required in the solution.
AWS Control Tower Account Factory can take up to 25 minutes to create and provision a new account. During this time, you will be unable to use AWS Control Tower to perform actions such as creating an organizational unit (OU) or enabling a guardrail on an OU. As a recommendation, running this solution during a time period when you do not anticipate using AWS Control Tower’s features is best practice.
Collect needed information
Note: You must have already configured AWS Control Tower, AWS Organizations, and AWS SSO to use this solution.
Before deploying the solution, you need to first collect some information for AWS CloudFormation.
The required information you’ll need to gather in these steps is:
AWS SSO instance ARN
AWS SSO Identity Store ID
Admin email address
Amazon S3 bucket
AWS SSO user group ARN
Prerequisite information: AWS SSO instance ARN
From the web console
You can find this information under Settings in the AWS SSO web console as shown in Figure 2.
Make a note of the InstanceArn value from the output, as this will be used in the AWS SSO instance ARN.
Prerequisite information: AWS SSO Identity Store ID
This is available from either the web console or the CLI.
From the web console
You can find this information in the same screen as the AWS SSO Instance ARN, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: AWS SSO identity store ID
From the CLI
To find this from the AWS CLI command aws sso-admin list-instances, use the IdentityStoreId from the second key-value pair returned.
Prerequisite information: Admin email address
The admin email address notified when a new AWS account is created.
This email address is used to receive notifications when a new AWS account is created.
Prerequisite information: S3 bucket
The name of the Amazon S3 bucket where the AWS account list CSV files will be uploaded to automate AWS account creation.
This globally unique bucket name will be used to create a new Amazon S3 Bucket, and the automation script will receive events from new objects uploaded to this bucket.
Prerequisite information: AWS SSO user group ARN
Go to AWS SSO > Groups and select the user group whose permission set you would like to assign to the new AWS account. Copy the Group ID from the selected user group. This can be a local AWS SSO user group, or a third-party identity provider-synced user group.
Note: For the AWS SSO user group, there is no AWS CLI equivalent; you need to use the AWS web console to collect this information.
Figure 4: AWS SSO user group ARN
Prerequisite information: AWS SSO permission set
The ARN of the AWS SSO permission set to be assigned to the user group.
From the web console
To view existing permission sets using the AWS SSO web console, go to AWS accounts > Permission sets. From there, you can see a list of permission sets and their respective ARNs.
Figure 5: AWS SSO permission sets list
You can also select the permission set name and from the detailed permission set window, copy the ARN of the chosen permission set. Alternatively, create your own unique permission set to be assigned to the intended user group.
Figure 6: AWS SSO permission set ARN
From the CLI
To get permission set information from the CLI, run the following AWS CLI command:
If you can’t determine the details for your permission set from the output of the CLI shown above, you can get the details of each permission set by running the following AWS CLI command:
{
"PermissionSet": {
"Name": "AWSPowerUserAccess",
"PermissionSetArn": "arn:aws:sso:::permissionSet/ssoins-abc1234567/ps-abc123def4567890",
"Description": "Provides full access to AWS services and resources, but does not allow management of Users and groups",
"CreatedDate": "2020-08-28T11:20:34.242000-04:00",
"SessionDuration": "PT1H"
}
}
The output above lists the name and description of each permission set, which can help you identify which permission set ARN you will use.
Solution initiation
The solution steps are in two parts: the initiation, and the batch account creation and SSO assignment processes.
To initiate the solution
Log in to the management account as the AWS Control Tower administrator, and deploy the provided AWS CloudFormation stack with the required parameters filled out.
When the stack is successfully deployed, it performs the following actions to set up the batch process. It creates:
The S3 bucket where you will upload the AWS account list CSV file.
A DynamoDB table. This table tracks the AWS account creation status.
A Lambda function, NewAccountHandler.
A Lambda function, CreateManagedAccount. This function is triggered by the entries in the Amazon DynamoDB table and initiates the batch account creation process.
An Amazon CloudWatch Events rule to detect the AWS Control Tower CreateManagedAccount lifecycle event.
Another Lambda function, CreateAccountAssignment. This function is triggered by AWS Control Tower Lifecycle Events via Amazon CloudWatch Events to assign the AWS SSO Permission Set to the specified User Group and AWS account
To create the AWS Account list CSV file
After you deploy the solution stack, you need to create a CSV file based on this sample.csv and upload it to the Amazon S3 bucket created in this solution. This CSV file will be used to automate the new account creation process.
Where the first line is the column names, and each subsequent line contains the new AWS accounts that you want to create and automatically assign that SSO user group to the permission set.
CSV fields
AccountName:
String between 1 and 50 characters [a-zA-Z0-9_-]
SSOUserEmail:
String with more than seven characters and be a valid email address for the primary AWS Administrator of the new AWS account
AccountEmail:
String with more than seven characters and be a valid email address not used by other AWS accounts
SSOUserFirstName:
String with the first name of the primary AWS Administrator of the new AWS account
SSOUserLastName:
String with the last name of the primary AWS Administrator of the new AWS account
OrgUnit:
String and must be an existing AWS Organizations OrgUnit
Status:
String, for future use
AccountId:
String, for future use
ErrorMsg:
String, for future use
Figure 7 shows the details that are included in our example for the two new AWS accounts that will be created.
Figure 7: Sample AWS account list CSV
The NewAccountHandler function is triggered from an object upload into the Amazon S3 bucket, validates the input file entries, and uploads the validated input file entries to the Amazon DynamoDB table.
The CreateManagedAccount function queries the DynamoDB table to get the details of the next account to be created. If there is another account to be created, then the batch account creation process moves on to Step 4, otherwise it completes.
The CreateManagedAccount function launches the AWS Control Tower Account Factory product in AWS Service Catalog to create and provision a new account.
After Account Factory has completed the account creation workflow, it generates the CreateManagedAccount lifecycle event, and the event log states if the workflow SUCCEEDED or FAILED.
The CloudWatch Events rule detects the CreateManagedAccount AWS Control Tower Lifecycle Event, and triggers the CreateManagedAccount and CreateAccountAssignment functions, and sends email notification to the administrator via AWS SNS.
The CreateManagedAccount function updates the Amazon DynamoDB table with the results of the AWS account creation workflow. If the account was successfully created, it updates the input file entry in the Amazon DynamoDB table with the account ID; otherwise, it updates the entry in the table with the appropriate failure or error reason.
The CreateAccountAssignment function assigns the AWS SSO Permission Set with the appropriate AWS IAM policies to the User Group specified in the Parameters when launching the AWS CloudFormation stack.
When the Amazon DynamoDB table is updated, the Amazon DynamoDB stream triggers the CreateManagedAccount function for subsequent AWS accounts or when new AWS account list CSV files are updated, then steps 1-9 are repeated.
Upload the CSV file
Once the AWS account list CSV file has been created, upload it into the Amazon S3 bucket created by the stack.
Deploying the solution
To launch the AWS CloudFormation stack
Now that all the requirements and the specifications to run the solution are ready, you can launch the AWS CloudFormation stack:
On the Specify stack details page, update the default parameters to use the information you captured in the prerequisites as shown in Figure 9, and choose Next.
Figure 9: Input parameters into AWS CloudFormation
On the Configurestack option page, choose Next.
On the Review page, check the box “I acknowledge that AWS CloudFormation might create IAM resources.” and choose Create Stack.
Once the AWS CloudFormation stack has completed, go to the Amazon S3 web console and select the Amazon S3 bucket that you defined in the AWS CloudFormation stack.
Upload the AWS account list CSV file with the information to create new AWS accounts. See To create the AWS Account list CSV file above for details on creating the CSV file.
Workflow and solution details
When a new file is uploaded to the Amazon S3 bucket, the following actions occur:
When you upload the AWS account list CSV file to the Amazon S3 bucket, the Amazon S3 service triggers an event for newly uploaded objects that invokes the Lambda function NewAccountHandler.
This Lambda function executes the following steps:
Checks whether the Lambda function was invoked by an Amazon S3 event, or the CloudFormation CREATE event.
If the event is a new object uploaded from Amazon S3, read the object.
Validate the content of the CSV file for the required columns and values.
If the data has a valid format, insert a new item with the data into the Amazon DynamoDB table, as shown in Figure 10 below.
Figure 10: DynamoDB table items with AWS accounts details
Amazon DynamoDB is configured to initiate the Lambda function CreateManagedAccount when insert, update, or delete items are initiated.
The Lambda function CreateManagedAccount checks for update event type. When an item is updated in the table, this item is checked by the Lambda function, and if the AWS account is not created, the Lambda function invokes the AWS Control Tower Account Factory from the AWS Service Catalog to create a new AWS account with the details stored in the Amazon DynamoDB item.
AWS Control Tower Account Factory starts the AWS account creation process. When the account creation process completes, the status of Account Factory will show as Available in Provisioned products, as shown in Figure 11.
Figure 11: AWS Service Catalog provisioned products for AWS account creation
Based on the Control Tower lifecycle events, the CreateAccountAssignment Lambda function will be invoked when the CreateManagedAccount event is sent to CloudWatch Events. An AWS SNS topic is also triggered to send an email notification to the administrator email address as shown in Figure 12 below.
Figure 12: AWS email notification when account creation completes
When invoked, the Lambda function CreateAccountAssignment assigns the AWS SSO user group to the new AWS account with the permission set defined in the AWS CloudFormation stack.
Figure 13: New AWS account showing user groups with permission sets assigned
Figure 13 above shows the new AWS account with the user groups and the assigned permission sets. This completes the automation process. The AWS SSO users that are part of the user group will automatically be allowed to access the new AWS account with the defined permission set.
Handling common sources of error
This solution connects multiple components to facilitate the new AWS account creation and AWS SSO permission set assignment. The correctness of the parameters in the AWS CloudFormation stack is important to make sure that when AWS Control Tower creates a new AWS account, it is accessible.
To verify that this solution works, make sure that the email address is a valid email address, you have access to that email, and it is not being used for any existing AWS account. After a new account is created, it is not possible to change its root account email address, so if you input an invalid or inaccessible email, you will need to create a new AWS account and remove the invalid account.
You can view common errors by going to AWS Service Catalog web console. Under Provisioned products, you can see all of your AWS Control Tower Account Factory-launched AWS accounts.
Figure 14: AWS Service Catalog provisioned product with error
Selecting Error under the Status column shows you the source of the error. Figure 15 below is an example of the source of the error:
Figure 15: AWS account creation error explanation
Conclusion
In this post, we’ve shown you how to automate batch creation of AWS accounts in AWS Control Tower and batch assignment of user access to AWS accounts in AWS SSO. When the batch AWS accounts creation and AWS SSO user access assignment processes are complete, the administrator will be notified by emails from AWS SNS. We’ve also explained how to handle some common sources of errors and how to avoid them.
As you automate the batch AWS account creation and user access assignment, you can reduce the time you spend on the undifferentiated heavy lifting work, and onboard your users in your organization much more quickly, so they can start using and experimenting on AWS right away.
To learn more about the best practices of setting up an AWS multi-account environment, check out this documentation for more information.
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.
In this blog post, we’ll walk you through how to deploy a solution to enrich AWS Security Hub findings with additional account-related metadata, such as the account name, the Organization Unit (OU) associated with the account, security contact information, and account tags. Account metadata can help you search findings, create insights, and better respond to and remediate findings.
AWS Security Hub ingests findings from multiple AWS services, including Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon Inspector, Amazon Macie, AWS Firewall Manager, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)Access Analyzer, and AWS Systems ManagerPatch Manager. Findings from each service are normalized into the AWS Security Finding Format (ASFF), so you can review findings in a standardized format and take action quickly. You can use AWS Security Hub to provide a single view of all security-related findings, and to set up alerts, automate remediation, and export specific findings to third‑party incident management systems.
The Security or DevOps teams responsible for investigating, responding to, and remediating Security Hub findings may need additional account metadata beyond the account ID, to determine what to do about the finding or where to route it. For example, determining whether the finding originated from a development or production account can be key to determining the priority of the finding and the type of remediation action needed. Having this metadata information in the finding allows customers to create custom insights in Security Hub to track which OUs or applications (based on account tags) have the most open security issues. This blog post demonstrates a solution to enrich your findings with account metadata to help your Security and DevOps teams better understand and improve their security posture.
Solution Overview
In this solution, you will use a combination of AWS Security Hub, Amazon EventBridge and AWS Lambda to ingest the findings and automatically enrich them with account related metadata by querying AWS Organizations and Account management service APIs. The solution architecture is shown in Figure 1 below:
Figure 1: Solution Architecture and workflow for metadata enrichment
The solution workflow includes the following steps:
New findings and updates to existing Security Hub findings from all the member accounts flow into the Security Hub administrator account. Security Hub generates Amazon EventBridge events for the findings.
An EventBridge rule created as part of the solution in the Security Hub administrator account will trigger a Lambda function configured as a target every time an EventBridge notification for a new or updated finding imported into Security Hub matches the EventBridge rule shown below:
The Lambda function uses the account ID from the event payload to retrieve both the account information and the alternate contact information from the AWS Organizations and Account management service API. The following code within the helper.py constructs the account_details object representing the account information to enrich the finding:
def get_account_details(account_id, role_name):
account_details ={}
organizations_client = AwsHelper().get_client('organizations')
response = organizations_client.describe_account(AccountId=account_id)
account_details["Name"] = response["Account"]["Name"]
response = organizations_client.list_parents(ChildId=account_id)
ou_id = response["Parents"][0]["Id"]
if ou_id and response["Parents"][0]["Type"] == "ORGANIZATIONAL_UNIT":
response = organizations_client.describe_organizational_unit(OrganizationalUnitId=ou_id)
account_details["OUName"] = response["OrganizationalUnit"]["Name"]
elif ou_id:
account_details["OUName"] = "ROOT"
if role_name:
account_client = AwsHelper().get_session_for_role(role_name).client("account")
else:
account_client = AwsHelper().get_client('account')
try:
response = account_client.get_alternate_contact(
AccountId=account_id,
AlternateContactType='SECURITY'
)
if response['AlternateContact']:
print("contact :{}".format(str(response["AlternateContact"])))
account_details["AlternateContact"] = response["AlternateContact"]
except account_client.exceptions.AccessDeniedException as error:
#Potentially due to calling alternate contact on Org Management account
print(error.response['Error']['Message'])
response = organizations_client.list_tags_for_resource(ResourceId=account_id)
results = response["Tags"]
while "NextToken" in response:
response = organizations_client.list_tags_for_resource(ResourceId=account_id, NextToken=response["NextToken"])
results.extend(response["Tags"])
account_details["tags"] = results
AccountHelper.logger.info("account_details: %s" , str(account_details))
return account_details
The Lambda function updates the finding using the Security Hub BatchUpdateFindings API to add the account related data into the Note and UserDefinedFields attributes of the SecurityHub finding:
#lookup and build the finding note and user defined fields based on account Id
enrichment_text, tags_dict = enrich_finding(account_id, assume_role_name)
logger.debug("Text to post: %s" , enrichment_text)
logger.debug("User defined Fields %s" , json.dumps(tags_dict))
#add the Note to the finding and add a userDefinedField to use in the event bridge rule and prevent repeat lookups
response = secHubClient.batch_update_findings(
FindingIdentifiers=[
{
'Id': enrichment_finding_id,
'ProductArn': enrichment_finding_arn
}
],
Note={
'Text': enrichment_text,
'UpdatedBy': enrichment_author
},
UserDefinedFields=tags_dict
)
Note: All state change events published by AWS services through Amazon Event Bridge are free of cost. The AWS Lambda free tier includes 1M free requests per month, and 400,000 GB-seconds of compute time per month at the time of publication of this post. If you process 2M requests per month, the estimated cost for this solution would be approximately $7.20 USD per month.
This solution requires that you have AWS Security Hub enabled in an AWS multi-account environment which is integrated with AWS Organizations. The AWS Organizations management account must designate a Security Hub administrator account, which can view data from and manage configuration for its member accounts. Follow these steps to designate a Security Hub administrator account for your AWS organization.
All the members accounts are tagged per your organization’s tagging strategy and their security alternate contact is filled. If the tags or alternate contacts are not available, the enrichment will be limited to the Account Name and the Organizational Unit name.
Trusted access must be enabled with AWS Organizations for AWS Account Management service. This will enable the AWS Organizations management account to call the AWS Account Management API operations (such as GetAlternateContact) for other member accounts in the organization. Trusted access can be enabled either by using AWS Management Console or by using AWS CLI and SDKs.
The following AWS CLI example enables trusted access for AWS Account Management in the calling account’s organization.
An IAM role with a read only access to lookup the GetAlternateContact details must be created in the Organizations management account, with a trust policy that allows the Security Hub administrator account to assume the role.
Solution Deployment
This solution consists of two parts:
Create an IAM role in your Organizations management account, giving it necessary permissions as described in the Create the IAM role procedure below.
Deploy the Lambda function and the other associated resources to your Security Hub administrator account
Create the IAM role
Using console, AWS CLI or AWS API
Follow the Creating a role to delegate permissions to an IAM user instructions to create a IAM role using the console, AWS CLI or AWS API in the AWS Organization management account with role name as account-contact-readonly, based on the trust and permission policy template provided below. You will need the account ID of your Security Hub administrator account.
The IAM trust policy allows the Security Hub administrator account to assume the role in your Organization management account.
Note: Replace the <SH Delegated Account ID> with the account ID of your Security Hub administrator account. Once the solution is deployed, you should update the principal in the trust policy shown above to use the new IAM role created for the solution.
You will need this while the deploying the solution in the next procedure.
Using AWS CloudFormation
Alternatively, you can use the provided CloudFormation template to create the role in the management account. The IAM role ARN is available in the Outputs section of the created CloudFormation stack.
Deploy the Solution to your Security Hub administrator account
You can deploy the solution using either the AWS Management Console, or from the GitHub repository using the AWS SAM CLI.
Note: if you have designated an aggregation Region within the Security Hub administrator account, you can deploy this solution only in the aggregation Region, otherwise you need to deploy this solution separately in each Region of the Security Hub administrator account where Security Hub is enabled.
To deploy the solution using the AWS Management Console
In your Security Hub administrator account, launch the template by choosing the Launch Stack button below, which creates the stack the in us-east-1 Region.
Note: if your Security Hub aggregation region is different than us-east-1 or want to deploy the solution in a different AWS Region, you can deploy the solution from the GitHub repository described in the next section.
On the Quick create stack page, for Stack name, enter a unique stack name for this account; for example, aws-security-hub–findings-enrichment-stack, as shown in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2: Quick Create CloudFormation stack for the Solution
For ManagementAccount, enter the AWS Organizations management account ID.
For OrgManagementAccountContactRole, enter the role ARN of the role you created previously in the Create IAM role procedure.
Choose Create stack.
Once the stack is created, go to the Resources tab and take note of the name of the IAM Role which was created.
Download or clone the github repository using the following commands
$ git clone https://github.com/aws-samples/aws-security-hub-findings-account-data-enrichment.git
$ cd aws-security-hub-findings-account-data-enrichment
Update the content of the profile.txt file with the profile name you want to use for the deployment
To create a new bucket for deployment artifacts, run create-bucket.sh by specifying the region as argument as below.
$ ./create-bucket.sh us-east-1
Deploy the solution to the account by running the deploy.sh script by specifying the region as argument
$ ./deploy.sh us-east-1
Once the stack is created, go to the Resources tab and take note of the name of the IAM Role which was created.
Update the principal element of the IAM role trust policy which you previously createdin the Organization management account inthe Create the IAM role procedure above, replacing it with the role name you noted down, as shown below.
To test that the solution is working as expected, you can create a standalone security group with an ingress rule that allows traffic from the internet. This will trigger a finding in Security Hub, which will be populated with the enriched attributes. You can then use these enriched attributes to filter and create custom insights, or take specific response or remediation actions.
To generate a sample Security Hub finding using AWS CLI
Create a Security Group using following AWS CLI command:
Within few minutes, a new finding will be generated in Security Hub, warning about the unrestricted ingress rule in the TestSecHubEnrichmentSG security group. For any new or updated findings which do not have the UserDefinedFields attribute findingEnriched set to true, the solution will enrich the finding with account related fields in both the Note and UserDefinedFields sections in the Security Hub finding.
To see and filter the enriched finding
Go to Security Hub and click on Findings on the left-hand navigation.
Click in the filter field at the top to add additional filters. Choose a filter field of AWS Account ID, a filter match type of is, and a value of the AWS Account ID where you created the TestSecHubEnrichmentSG security group.
Add one more filter. Choose a filter field of Resource type, a filter match type of is, and the value of AwsEc2SecurityGroup.
Identify the finding for security group TestSecHubEnrichmentSG with updates to Note and UserDefinedFields, as shown in Figures 4 and 5 below:
Figure 4: Account metadata enrichment in Security Hub finding’s Note field
Figure 5: Account metadata enrichment in Security Hub finding’s UserDefinedFields field
Note: The actual attributes you will see as part of the UserDefinedFields may be different from the above screenshot. Attributes shown will depend on your tagging configuration and the alternate contact configuration. At a minimum, you will see the AccountName and OU fields.
Once you confirm that the solution is working as expected, delete the stand-alone security group TestSecHubEnrichmentSG, which was created for testing purposes.
Create custom insights using the enriched attributes
You can use the attributes available in the UserDefinedFields in the Security Hub finding to filter the findings. This lets you generate custom Security Hub Insight and reports tailored to suit your organization’s needs. The example shown in Figure 6 below creates a custom Security Hub Insight for findings grouped by severity for a specific owner, using the Owner attribute within the UserDefinedFields object of the Security Hub finding.
Figure 6: Custom Insight with Account metadata filters
Event Bridge rule for response or remediation action using enriched attributes
You can also use the attributes in the UserDefinedFields object of the Security Hub finding within the EventBridge rule to take specific response or remediation actions based on values in the attributes. In the example below, you can see how the Environment attribute can be used within the EventBridge rule configuration to trigger specific actions only when value matches PROD.
This blog post walks you through a solution to enrich AWS Security Hub findings with AWS account related metadata using Amazon EventBridge notifications and AWS Lambda. By enriching the Security Hub findings with account related information, your security teams have better visibility, additional insights and improved ability to create targeted reports for specific account or business teams, helping them prioritize and improve overall security response. To learn more, see:
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below. If you have any questions about this post, start a thread on the AWS Security Hub forum.
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.
Systems vulnerability management is a key component of your enterprise security program. Its goal is to remediate OS, software, and applications vulnerabilities. Scanning tools can help identify and classify these vulnerabilities to keep the environment secure and compliant.
Typically, vulnerability scanning tools operate from internal or external networks to discover and report vulnerabilities. For internal scanning, the tools use private IPs of target systems in scope. For external scans, the public target system’s IP addresses are used. It is important that security teams always maintain an accurate inventory of all deployed resource’s IP addresses. This ensures a comprehensive, consistent, and effective vulnerability assessment.
This blog discusses a scalable, serverless, and automated approach to discover public IP addresses assigned to resources in a single or multi-account environment in AWS, using AWS Config.
Single account is when you have all your resources in a single AWS account. A multi-account environment refers to many accounts under the same AWS Organization.
An elastic network interface is a logical networking component in a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) that represents a virtual network card. The elastic network interface routes traffic to other destinations/resources. Usually, you have to make Describe* API calls for the specific resource with an elastic network interface to get information about its configuration and IP address. This may throttle the resource-specific API calls, and result in higher costs. Additionally, if there are tens or hundreds of accounts, it becomes exponentially more difficult to get the information into a single inventory.
AWS Config enables you to assess, audit, and evaluate the configurations of your AWS resources. The advanced query feature provides a single query endpoint and language to get current resource state metadata for a single account and Region, or multiple accounts and Regions. You can use configuration aggregators to run the same queries from a central account across multiple accounts and AWS Regions.
AWS Config supports a subset of structured query language (SQL) SELECT syntax, which enables you to perform property-based queries and aggregations on the current configuration item (CI) data. Advanced query is available at no additional cost to AWS Config customers in all AWS Regions (except China Regions) and AWS GovCloud (US).
AWS Organizations helps you centrally govern your environment. Its integration with other AWS services lets you define central configurations, security mechanisms, audit requirements, and resource sharing across accounts in your organization.
Choosing scope of advanced queries in AWS Config
When running advanced queries in AWS Config, you must choose the scope of the query. The scope defines the accounts you want to run the query against and is configured when you create an aggregator.
Following are the three possible scopes when running advanced queries:
Single account and single Region
Multiple accounts and multiple Regions
AWS Organization accounts
Single account and single Region
Figure 1. AWS Config workflow for single account and single Region
The use case shown in Figure 1 addresses the need of customers operating within a single account and single Region. With AWS Config enabled for the individual account, you will use AWS Config advanced query feature to run SQL queries. These will give you resource metadata about associated public IPs. You do not require an aggregator for single-account and single Region.
In Figure 1.1, the advanced query returned results from a single account and all Availability Zones within the Region in which the query was run.
Figure 1.1 Advanced query returning results for a single account and single Region
Query for reference
SELECT
resouceId,
resourceName,
resourceType,
configuration.association.publicIp,
availabilityZone,
awsRegion
WHERE
resourceType='AWS::EC2::NetworkInterface'
AND configuration.association.publicIp>'0.0.0.0'
This query is fetching the properties of all elastic network interfaces. The WHERE condition is used to list the elastic network interfaces using the resourceType property and find all public IPs greater than 0.0.0.0. This is because elastic network interfaces can exist with a private IP, in which case there will be no public IP assigned to it. For a list of supported resourceType, refer to supported resource types for AWS Config.
Multiple accounts and multiple Regions
Figure 2. AWS Config monitoring workflow for multiple account and multiple Regions. The figure shows EC2, EKS, and Amazon ECS, but it can be any AWS resource having a public elastic network interface.
AWS Config enables you to monitor configuration changes against multiple accounts and multiple Regions via an aggregator, see Figure 2. An aggregator is an AWS Config resource type that collects AWS Config data from multiple accounts and Regions. You can choose the aggregator scope when running advanced queries in AWS Config. Remember to authorize the aggregator accounts to collect AWS Config configuration and compliance data.
Figure 2.1 Advanced query returning results from multiple Regions (awsRegion column) as highlighted in the diagram
This use case applies when you have AWS resources in multiple accounts (or span multiple organizations) and multiple Regions. Figure 2.1 shows the query results being returned from multiple AWS Regions.
Accounts in AWS Organization
Figure 3. The workflow of accounts in an AWS Organization being monitored by AWS Config. This figure shows EC2, EKS, and Amazon ECS but it can be any AWS resource having a public elastic network interface.
An aggregator also enables you to monitor all the accounts in your AWS Organization, see Figure 3. When this option is chosen, AWS Config enables you to run advanced queries against the configuration history in all the accounts in your AWS Organization. Remember that an aggregator will only aggregate data from the accounts and Regions that are specified when the aggregator is created.
Figure 3.1 Advanced query returning results from all accounts (accountId column) under an AWS Organization
In Figure 3.1, the query is run against all accounts in an AWS Organization. This scope of AWS Organization is accomplished by the aggregator and it automatically accumulates data from all accounts under a specific AWS Organization.
Common architecture workflow for discovering public IPs
Figure 4. High-level architecture pattern for discovering public IPs
The workflow shown in Figure 4 starts with Amazon EventBridge triggering an AWS Lambda function. You can configure an Amazon EventBridge schedule via rate or cron expressions, which define the frequency. This AWS Lambda function will host the code to make an API call to AWS Config that will run an advanced query. The advanced query will check for all elastic network interfaces in your account(s). This is because any public resource launched in your account will be assigned an elastic network interface.
When the results are returned, they can be stored on Amazon S3. These result files can be timestamped (via naming or S3 versioning) in order to keep a history of public IPs used in your account. The result set can then be fed into or accessed by the vulnerability scanning tool of your choice.
Note: AWS Config advanced queries can also be used to query IPv6 addresses. You can use the “configuration.ipv6Addresses” AWS Config property to get IPv6 addresses. When querying IPv6 addresses, remove “configuration.association.publicIp > ‘0.0.0.0’” condition from the preceding sample queries. For more information on available AWS Config properties and data types, refer to GitHub.
Conclusion
In this blog, we demonstrated how to extract public IP information from resources deployed in your account(s) using AWS Config and AWS Config advanced query. We discussed how you can support your vulnerability scanning process by identifying public IPs in your account(s) that can be fed into your scanning tool. This solution is serverless, automated, and scalable, which removes the undifferentiated heavy lifting required to manage your resources.
Amazon Detective makes it easy to analyze, investigate, and quickly identify the root cause of potential security issues or suspicious activities by collecting log data from your AWS resources. Amazon Detective simplifies the process of a deep dive into a security finding from other AWS security services, such as Amazon GuardDuty and AWS SecurityHub. Detective uses machine learning, statistical analysis, and graph theory to build a linked set of data that enables customers to easily conduct faster and more efficient security investigations.
In this post you will learn about the new AWS Organizations integration with Amazon Detective, where new and existing Detective customers can delegate any account in their organization to be the delegated Detective administrator account, and can centrally manage the Detective behavior graph database for an organization with up to 1,200 accounts.
Customers tell us that they want to manage security findings and investigations across multiple AWS Accounts. Depending on the customer this can be 100s or 1000s of accounts. AWS Organizations integration with security services, including GuardDuty, Security Hub and AWS IAM Access Analyzer comes in handy by helping customers centralize management and governance of their environments as they scale and grow their AWS accounts and resources. Adding to the list, Detective is now integrated with AWS Organizations to simplify security posture management across all existing and future AWS accounts across an organization. Organizations integration is available in all AWS Regions that Detective supports.
Detective is aware of your existing delegated administrator accounts for other AWS Security services such as GuardDuty or Security Hub. Using this awareness, Detective recommends that you choose the same account as the administrator account for Detective, as shown in Figure 1. For a more complete walk though of how to enable your accounts, visit the AWS Detective Documentation.
Figure 1. Setting delegated administrator
You can then use the same account to manage all of your security services. AWS recommends you align your Detective administrator account with your GuardDuty and SecurityHub administrator accounts, to enable seamless integration between Detective and those services.
In GuardDuty or Security Hub, when viewing details for a GuardDuty finding, you can pivot from the finding details to the Detective finding profile.
In Detective, when investigating a GuardDuty finding, you can choose the option to archive that finding.
Once designated, the chosen account becomes the administrator account for the organization behavior graph. They can enable any organization account as a member account in the organization behavior graph, and can configure Detective to automatically enable organization accounts when they join the organization.
Figure 2. Auto-enabling Organization accounts
The Detective administrator account can also manually invite other accounts to join the organization behavior graph.
Figure 3. Inviting accounts to join the Organization behavior graph
From Detective, the administrator account can centrally conduct security investigations across the organization
Considerations for AWS Organizations support
Some considerations and recommendations around Organizations support for Detective:
Detective allows up to 1,200 member accounts in each behavior graph.
The Detective administrator account becomes the administrator account for the organization’s behavior graph.
An account can be a member account of multiple behavior graphs in the same Region. An account can accept multiple invitations. An organization account can be enabled as a member account in the organization behavior graph, and can then also accept invitations to other behavior graphs.
An account can only be the administrator account of one behavior graph per Region, but can be an administrator account in different Regions.
Changes to an organization are not immediately reflected in Detective. For most changes, such as new and removed organization accounts, it can take up to an hour for Detective to be notified.
Other recent updates from Amazon Detective
Additional support for all GuardDuty findings
With the recent expansion of security investigation support for Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) and DNS-related findings on Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon Detective now provides full coverage of all detections from GuardDuty. Security analysts can now easily investigate and analyze the root cause of all GuardDuty findings using Detective, using the Investigate in Detective option in GuardDuty and Security Hub for further investigation.
New resource focused view
In addition to these integrations with AWS Organization and GuardDuty, Detective now makes it even easier for a security analyst to investigate entities and behaviors using a revamped user experience as seen in Figure 4. Amazon Detective presents a unified view of user and resource interactions over time, with all the context and details in one place, to help you quickly analyze the root cause of a security finding.
Figure 4. New resource focused view
New finding overview
The new finding overview provides an expanded set of details for each finding, and provides links to the profiles for each involved entity as seen in the right panel in Figure 4. With this unified view, you can visualize all of the details and context in one place, while identifying the underlying reasons for the findings. This resource-focused view helps you understand the connections between resources affected by a security finding, and further helps you drill down into relevant historical activity to quickly determine the root cause.
Integration with Splunk
Amazon Detective, in coordination with the Splunk Trumpet project, has released the ability to pivot from an Amazon GuardDuty finding in Splunk directly to an Amazon Detective entity profile. Customers can now quickly identify the root cause of potential security issues or suspicious activities. This setting can be enabled on the Splunk Trumpet project installation page by selecting Detective GuardDuty URLs from the AWS CloudWatch Events dropdown.
Amazon Detective’s interactive visualizations make it easy to investigate and analyze issues more thoroughly and effectively, with minimal effort. Using these visualizations, customers can easily filter large sets of event data into specific timelines, with all the details, context, and guidance needed to help you to investigate quickly. For example; Amazon Detective enables you to view login attempts on a geolocation map, drill down into relevant historical activity, quickly determine a root cause, and if necessary, take action to resolve the issue.
Amazon Detective makes it easy to analyze, investigate, and quickly identify the root cause of potential security issues. To get started, enable a 30-day free trial of Amazon Detective with just a few clicks in the AWS Management console. See the AWS Regions page for a list of all Regions where Detective is available. To learn more, visit the Amazon Detective product page.
If you have feedback about this post, submit comments in the Comments section below.
Want more AWS Security news? Follow us on Twitter.
The collective thoughts of the interwebz
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
.
.
